[OSB] File transfer

Hi,
I'm analyzing a problem of transferring files (flat text or zipped flat text) from our file brokering server using OSB SFTP transport. Files are 200MB tops.
My idea was to invoke a proxy service with a remote URI instead of transferring the whole file. However, due to some security issues there is an idea to use the OSB SFTP transport.
I am aware that parsing of such amount of data using OSB is madness, but how about transferring without touching it?
As PS is still a WS to me, it feels somewhat strange. Is there any reason (apart from "security issues") why we should use it this?
What is thought of as acceptable amount of data to be transferred efficiently via OSB?
Thanks,
P.

the process which generates the file should use an extension NOT polled by OSB while writing the file, and once completed it should rename the file to the extension polled by OSB
otherwise you can use a file trigger pattern, which is supported by the JCA File Adapter
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/integration.1111/e10231/adptr_file.htm#CIAJCBGI

Similar Messages

OSB File Transfer check file status

Hi,
I have to read a file from a directory using a proxy service (file protocol).
Sometimes the proxy takes the file before it is finalized. It can be very big and take a long time to complete its writing.
Is there any way to check the status of the file?

the process which generates the file should use an extension NOT polled by OSB while writing the file, and once completed it should rename the file to the extension polled by OSB
otherwise you can use a file trigger pattern, which is supported by the JCA File Adapter
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/integration.1111/e10231/adptr_file.htm#CIAJCBGI

Facing problem in SFTP File Transfer in OSB 11gR1

Hi,
We are facing issue in SFTP File transfer from a very long time now.
We have created around 10 SFTP Services which are configured to transfer files from One server to another in the entire application setup.
Each SFTP Service consists of a Proxy service of SFTP type, which calls Biz Service and transfers files in default pattern.
These services were running successfully from a long time, but from past 2-3 months, files are not getting transferred to target folder everytime.
i.e. After restarting managed server, they get transfered for few days, but start giving problem after some time.
I have checked full configuration settings, file paths, also i have checked file names to trace duplicacies if any, but there is no such possibility of passing duplicate files as file names consists of timestamps.
We have a clustered domain setup with 2 managed servers configured running in 2 instances.
The observations in case of error while passing file are as follows :
1. A file named abc.xyz is kept in Source Directory.
2. abc.xyz gets converted to abc.xyz%.stage file in some time.
3. It does not move to archive directory nor to target directory.
All servers are up as it is PROD Environment and hence no server issue.
While testing same services in SIT Servers, we never face any issue.
Proxy Service configuration is as below :
Authentication Mode      Username Password
Service Account      *****NOT TO BE DISCLOSED*****
Timeout      60
File Mask      [*.*]
Scan SubDirectories      false
Pass By Reference      false
Remote Streaming      true
Post Read Action      archive
Archive Directory      *****NOT TO BE DISCLOSED*****
Error Directory      *****NOT TO BE DISCLOSED*****
Retry Count      5
Managed Server      *****ONE OF THE MANAGED SERVERS*****
Polling Interval      900
Read Limit      0
Sort By Arrival      false
Request encoding      utf-8
We have mentioned different polling intervals for different services. Values used are : 450, 900, 1800, etc.
Please guide for solution of this problem ASAP.
Thanks
Cheena Malhotra
Edited by: cmalhotra on Jan 20, 2013 12:36 PM

(a) This doesn't appear to have anything to do with the topic of this forum.
(b) If this fails:
getFtpClient().changeWorkingDirectory(getRemoteDirectory()); //This line first returning false then of course nothing else will work. That's what you need to investigate.

"Windows - No Disk" error message on file transfer

Hello!
I updated our ZDM7 server from plain old ZDM7 with no updates to ZDM7 SP1
IR1. Now, when initiating File Transfer operation with any workstation, up
comes this error message:
"Windows - No Disk"
"Exception Processing Message c0000013 Parameters 75b6bf9c 4 75b6bf9c 75b6bf9c"
[Cancel] [Try Again] [Continue]
If I click "Continue" 4 times, file transfer starts up successfully.
Any ideas about how to get rid of this annoying message?
Toomas Aas

Toomas,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Specify filename in OSB File Trasport Business Service

Hi All,
Is it possible to specify the complete filename in OSB File Transport Business Service?
the default behavior allows me to specify the prefix and suffix only, is it possible to override and specify the complete filename?
Thanks,
Tal

Specifying the filename for outbound FTP transport in OSB the thread discusses with FTP BS and same would apply for File BS
Manoj

UCMA 4 and back to backing a file transfer request

OK, I know that file transfer isn't technically supported on UCMA 4.0, but I wanted to take another look at it and see whether there was a way to b2b a file transfer request. After all, there's no reason that it shouldn't work if the messaging is correct,
right? The scenario I have is A <-b2b-> app <-b2b->B. I have an IM conversation going on between A and B, so now I'm trying to set it up so that A can send a file to B.
So far I've extended the platform to accept file transfer requests by creating my own call and factory classes, and then registering them using RegisterPlatformExtension. This means that when A sends a file, the INVITE gets delivered to my application.
Now I'm taking that INVITE and creating a new b2b call. A file transfer request looks something like this:
TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [0]16A8.4B28::02/10/2015-19:53:05.007.001d492f (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::ProtocolRecord::Flush:ProtocolRecord.cpp(265))[3939761282] $$begin_record
Trace-Correlation-Id: 3939761282
Instance-Id: FDB3
Direction: incoming
Peer: 10.0.154.20:49282
Message-Type: request
Start-Line: INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=eafd3e699d;epid=ccd5657cac
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Call-ID: 0acf0330423241258576d7c5cc42aa01
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:[email protected];opaque=user:epid:d2lIs-103l2YSpDwCSajtAAA;gruu>
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.0.154.20:49282
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Length: 1920
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0"
Message-Body:
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Dis; handling=optional; ms-proxy-2007fallback
v=0
o=- 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.200.71
s=session
c=IN IP4 192.168.200.71
b=CT:99980
t=0 0
m=data 21300 TCP/RTP/SAVP 127
a=ice-ufrag:lYAu
a=ice-pwd:y0gkW4r9zGSW6E2VdtMprlEh
a=candidate:1 1 TCP-PASS 2120613887 192.168.200.71 10856 typ host
a=candidate:1 2 TCP-PASS 2120613374 192.168.200.71 10856 typ host
a=candidate:2 1 TCP-ACT 2121006591 192.168.200.71 21300 typ host
a=candidate:2 2 TCP-ACT 2121006078 192.168.200.71 21300 typ host
a=candidate:3 1 TCP-PASS 2120612863 10.0.154.20 31624 typ host
a=candidate:3 2 TCP-PASS 2120612350 10.0.154.20 31624 typ host
a=candidate:4 1 TCP-ACT 2121005567 10.0.154.20 3921 typ host
a=candidate:4 2 TCP-ACT 2121005054 10.0.154.20 3921 typ host
a=cryptoscale:1 client AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:4CZbzYM/GYDbygj8JwMTodKo85C4Xx7TMzeMIuBU|2^31|1:1
a=crypto:2 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:Ohlo65gDsUvxCF39A382Rl4vGL+SG9R/lUEYU/br|2^31|1:1
a=crypto:3 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:EZ7Zm3K0H/WW5K49LAk9/C0T8x8nhkumJOycSek7|2^31
a=setup:active
a=connection:new
a=rtcp:21300
a=mid:1
a=sendonly
a=rtpmap:127 x-data/90000
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0
Content-Type: application/ms-filetransfer+xml
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Dis; handling=optional
<request xmlns=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/rtc/2009/05/filetransfer" =
requestId=3D"13">
<publishFile>
<fileInfo embedded=3D"true">
<id>{67190A30-C59F-480D-96DD-5F3941C39C49}</id>
<name>dbchange.log</name>
<size>3609</size>
</fileInfo>
</publishFile>
</request>
------=_NextPart_000_0026_01D04541.4641C2D0--
$$end_record
I've got my b2bed invite looking almost identical to the original invite by creating a custom MIME type on the CallEstablishOptions for the back to back call using something like this:
Regex r = new Regex(@"^((.|\n)*)(\<request)((.|\n)*)(request\>)((.|\n)*)$");
Match m=r.Match(args.RequestData.GetMessageBodyString());
content=string.Format("Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r\n{0}{1}{2}",m.Groups[3],m.Groups[4],m.Groups[6]);
opt.CustomMimeParts.Add(new MimePartContentDescription(new ContentType("application/ms-filetransfer+xml"),System.Text.ASCIIEncoding.UTF8.GetBytes(content)));
opt.CustomMimeParts[0].ContentDispositionHeader = new SignalingHeader("Content-Disposition", "render; handling=optional");
So far the only differences I can see in my outbound message vs the original SDP are that the Content-Transfer-Encoding might not be seen as a header (since the SignalingHeaders property on the MimePartContentDescription is read only), and the Content-Transfer-Encoding
on the first MIME part (created by the BackToBackCall) is missing (even though I specified it on the PassThroughHeaders). Even with all of this though, I still get a 488 on client B when I attempt the transfer (even though the invite goes through).
What I'm wondering though, is whether there's any way at all to get this working the way I'd expect, where a file gets transferred directly between A and B, without my bot having to receive it first. The other approach I've looked at is binding my
own media provider class to customize the SDP, but if this MIME part approach isn't going to work, then I have a feeling the media provider won't work either.
Any suggestions on where to look next?
Thanks!
Chris

Chris,
I am trying to do something similar to this and from what I have read and in talking to MS is that you need to extend the Call and Flow class which it looks like you have been able to do. Could I bother you to share what you have written? Maybe we can help
each other out on this. I am basically trying to create an application that will be able to capture a file transfer and save it, then send the original request on to the intended recipient.
Thanks in advance,
Anthony

I have an old ipod i just got the new iphone 4s but the songs that are on my ipod are not on my itunes how can i transfer them from my old ipod to my itunes. reason they are not on my itunes becasue i've change computer also and didn't a file transfer bef

i just purchase the new iphone 4s. I also have an old ipod with a lot on songs which are not on my itunes becasue i didn't do a file transfer when i got my new computer a ew months ago. How can i add my songs from the old ipod to my itunes.

See this older post from another forum member Zevoneer covering the different methods and software available to assist you with the task of copying content from your iPod back to your PC and into iTunes.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2452022?start=0&tstart=0
B-rock

MBP (mid-2009) freezing, slow installations and file transfer

I bought the latest MacBook Pro model and installed Snow Leopard on a cleanly formatted hard drive. I have tried migrating via ethernet and FireWire from my iMac, but the migrations failed either due to freezing (via FireWire after roughly 24 hours of file transfer) or by an error message (ethernet with Migration Assistant).
Only through a Time Machine backup was I able to transfer my account files to the MBP, which again totaled at over 20 hours of transferring. The system was a mess, clogged constantly by freezing and spinning beach balls of death for durations lasting around 10-20 seconds during which music would clip after 5-10 seconds of everything not responding, this being accentuated especially during installations. I decided to format and try anew.
Now I've formatted the hard drive, installed Snow Leopard and will transfer my files manually onto a clean account. Installations take a long time although SL installation is within 30 minutes, iLife took 1.5 hours to install 5 GB. During the installation Safari stopped responding, as did the entire system, and the spinning beach ball would keep spinning. Watching a 480p trailer in Quicktime made the entire computer freeze up (no video/audio) for 10 seconds halfway. Transferring 136 GB (my Music folder) will take around 15 hours according to the estimate after 10 minutes of transferring.
I've sold my iMac now and all I have are the files on my external hard drive. I want to get them onto my MBP ASAP but the slowness is preventing me from doing what needs to be done and it's very frustrating. When I try to boot into Hardware Testing by holding D down the computer doesn't do it no matter what (Application DVD in or not, plugged into power or not). I've tried resetting PRAM but I get the same inaction.
Any ideas?
Edit: I've done Disk Utility to no avail, it finds nothing wrong.

Installed, still getting freezes with spinning beach balls. Transfer says it would take 1 hour opposed to that 15 hours, but it stops transferring after X amount of gigabytes (from 0.5 to 5), not do anything for a while and then continue, stretching the estimate to over 2 hours after some time. I don't know if this is just with the hard drive.
The freeze-ups are frustrating as **** and make for a very poor experience. Any ideas to get to the bottom of this? I still haven't been able to boot into the Hardware Test no matter how much I try.

File transfer: AFP vs FTP

Setup:
Cable modem to Linksys WRT54g broadcasting only in G only mode for PBG4.
AEBSn#1 in bridge mode via Ethernet from Linksys, N only mode, broadcasting wirelessly.
AEBSn#2 is wirelessly extending N-only from AEBSn#1, and is connected to a mini with external hard drive.
Using PBG4, if I mount a volume from the mini and transfer a file, transfer time is very slow: approx. 20 minutes for a 200MB file. If I FTP from PBG4 into the mini, transfer time is 2 minutes.
(I think the same happens if I use a Macbook Pro connected to the N-only network, but it's in for repairs right now, so I can't be sure.)
Any idea why the transfer times are so different b/w AFP and FTP and, more importantly, what I can do to remedy this? Thanks.

Same problem here. I have two AEBS Gigabit in bridge mode. Transfering a file via FTP or with Apple Remote Access (ARD) brings up to 3 MB/sec. Same file and same configuration connected via AFP only brings 60 kB/sec.
I hope somebody has an idea how to fix this.
Thanks in advance

How to achieve the maximum file transfer rate from PXI to local host?

I will have to copy a huge amount of data (as big as 50 GB) from a PXI-8106 unit on site to a laptop. Currently it would take several hours. It is critical to max out the data transfer rate.
The standard method we've been using is just drag and drop using Windows Explorer via FTP. I tried to use FTP VIs with Filezilla Server as well but the transfer rate is only like 1.5 MB/s. Is this normal? Once I saw it was 3.0 MB/s but for some reason, that isn't happening now.
For another option, I tried to transfer data to a USB flash drive but it's even slower. As far as I know, USB 2.0 transfer rate is supposed to be around 60 MB/s but why would it be slower than 1.5 MB/s? What could be the speed limiting factor in my file transfer setup?
Any tips on improving file transfer rate would be appreciated!

Sustained 40 MB/s? That is my dream speed! The maximum speed I've ever seen here was about 25 MB/s, which is still very good, and that happened only after copying back and forth, which I explained above. Let me go through what I did with screencaps first.
These are the test tdms files to transfer in the PXI: an original file witten in the PXI and its copy file. I copied the original file from PXI to laptop and renamed it (added '_copy') and then copied it back to PXI.
FTP module is transferring the original file to the Filezilla server on laptop. Note the low speed.
FTP module is transferring the copy file to the Filezilla server on laptop. Note the higher speed.
This is the FTP sub VI I'm using. It transfers files in sub-folders (one level lower), too. The data connection is set to 'passive' on the FTP Put Multiple Files VI but it doesn't seem to make any difference. I attach the sub VI.
You tried the file transfer with a 500 MB text file. Would there be any difference if the file type was tdms? Would the RAM size matter? It is 2GB here.
And the LED is orange, which means Gigabit.
Another question: Is there any way to programmatically stop file transfer in progress? Currently, I just have to restart the PXI.
Thank you!
Attachments:
FTP.vi ‏40 KB

How do you install CS5 onto a new computer without Time Machine/file transfer

I'm not getting a new computer, but my current one is getting a little old (Macbook Pro V. 10.6.8) and I'm afraid it might crash if I download the newest Maverick system, which is why I want to make absolutely sure I'm able to save and transfer all my old files and CS5 Creative Suite programs if this indeed happens. I don't trust Time Machine to do it; my boss had this happen and Time Machine did not transfer the Adobe programs. I also don't want to rely on Time Machine and any other file transfer (which all new Macs offer) because I've had brand new computers crash because of old corrupt files from my old computer converting over, and the Apple people said it's a bad idea (which would have been nice to know BEFORE the computer crashed and everything. . .) I've been told you can only use the CD to install CS5 onto your computer twice, which I've already done (thanks to my brand new computer crashing once already). So I would like to know how it's possible to install the program onto a new computer should this one crash, without the use of file transfer or Time Machine. I have no interest in upgrading to CC.
Thanks!

Avoid using Time Machine for re-installing Adobe software. It rarely works and usually breaks the activation mechanism.
I've been told you can only use the CD to install CS5 onto your computer twice,
Not quite.
You can install the software as many times as you like but you can only activate the software for use on a maximum of two computers at the same time.
To re-install you will need your CS5 serial number.
Download the installer from Download CS5 products
Install then enter your serial number when prompted.

When upgrading to OSX Yosemite do all my programs and files transfer over such as Office for mac, saved documents from word,excel,pics,pdf files,etc.etc...

Will all my files transfer over (or stay) automatically right after upgrading to Yosemite or do I have to backup every single desired program or document? Question is do I HAVE to please if you can answer if its mandatory or not. Not looking for recommendations that I SHOULD back up or anything like that just want to know if it is mandatory to perform a backup to be able to keep or transfer all my current programs and apps and documents currently on my MB Pro Retina.

Yes, upgrading to Yosemite will not touch your 3rd party apps or files in the Home folder.
Although not mandatory you should have a a backup of your hard drive regardless if you upgrade to Yosemite or not. To not have a backup is just playing Russian roulette as there are only two types of hard drives; those that have failed and those that will.

Remote Execute and File Transfer Error

Whenever we try to do a Remote Execute of File Transfer, we get an 1899
error. Here's the strange thing, we can RE and FT to desktops that are
still running the ZfD 4.x client. Seems to be only happening on the latest
(ZfD 6.5sp2). Any ideas? Also, remote control and remote view still work
w/o problem.

Blewis,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at
http://support.novell.com.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Creative Zen USB and File transfer probl

Am the unhappy owner of a brand new Creative Zen touch 20gb mp3 player which apparently works with usb 2.0. After installing the software which came on the cd (file transfer software and nomad explorer) the Zen appears to get recognised by the pc with no problems when i connect via the usb cable. The Zen also displays 'docked' which is all very well. However if i select say 0 tracks to download to the player the xp progress bar seems to halt at around 60-70% and eventually the program (nomad) complains that the operation cannot be completed. I noticed that the small hard dri've in the player feels as though it is 'spinning down' around a similar time to the message being displayed. If at this stage i refresh the players view in nomad explorer it can be found with no problem....its just i cant write to it until i unplug the usb from the zen and reconnect. I spoke to creative who told me that because my pc (in system devices) reports that my usb is an 'open host' adapter...this means it cannot supply adequate power to the player....but surely USB2.0 is USB2.0 and if something claims to be USB2.0 compliant that would be the end of the story? The usb card im using is a usb 2.0 pci card and is also pretty new. Any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated.
I have tried various usb ports, usb and2 conections ( I have both), various cables and combinations and the same happens. I have also tried win xp and win98, and other disks I have with the same result. I have managed to transfer 20 os so mp3s (a small proportion of those I have been trying to transfer)after 3-4 hours hard labour but never the contents of a full folder. After a proportion of the files are transferred then Zen touch becomes 'busy' or 'not connected'. Obviously there is no way I can continue like this and it will have to go back.
I have tried the slightly newer driver but this did not work at all and I had to roll back to the one that came on the CD. I feel that I have given it a fair shot trying all the workarounds.
Is is a USB power problem? Should a powered usb hub cure it's If so why?
But is this surely is Creative's problem. It is obviously a known issue but what are they doing about it's Putting out Zens which are prone to this problem is not good practice. Any solutions out there?

Hey,
If you tried it on a friend's computer and you're still having problems then it may be a problem with the Zen. Before you call or e-mail tech support, here is what they will tell you do to first before they really get in depth with helping you. Go into Rescue Mode (there is an explanation on how to do this at the top of the forum) and do a disk clean up. After that, try it. If that doesn't work then click the reload OS option which will take the firmware (like windows to your PC) off the Zen. Don't worry you can easily put it back on. Go to Support>Downloads>select Zen Touch, etc, etc. and download the latest firmware and run it. Hopefully that will fix it....
I had some connection problems myself with my ZT as soon as I got it as well. and simply reflashing the firmware fixed and now I love my Zen. I hope everything works out for you.
Wilco

Error no. 4 in SAPGUI during graphic call or file transfer.

Hi,
In the landscape there are still 46b sap version, i have some functional queries that when i executes go to the sap graphic screen and it throws with no output. I understand that that it works in ECC version but not for 46b.
This issue is related to SAPGUI, as i have the latest sapgui installed 710 that works well for ECC.
But if i input the parameter in sap 46b system , and execute to get the graphic chart i get this:
The Generation of Graphs for Stock Movements in the MC49 Transaction.
When you call a hierarchy graphic, the following error messages are displayed
1. 'Too much data in a table or too many tables defined
2. E4: error writing to XC pipe: child #1 ( id: STAT ); reclen12
3. Error no. 4 in SAPGUI during graphic call or file transfer.
I have also look in to note 316232, 361222, 96885. for this but this says to upgrade the sapgui,which is already in.
What is the solution for this.
Regards,
Chetan.

Take a look at this thread. This may provide you some guidance as it appears that Error has been encountered before.
[Link Here|Error no. 4 in SAPGUI with Graphics call or file transfer;
Regards,
Zecher

[OSB] File transfer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for