OSB Service Response times

Hi,
How do we monitor the response time measurement of each service invocation? I am aware that OSB provides Service Health by which Avg Response times can be monitored.
However I am looking for any OSB native capability that will provide start time, end time, response time for each instance of service invocation. Is there a way to do this in OSB in a native way without custom logging start time, end time in the service message flow itself?
Thanks

I think that what you need is a sort of access logging functionality. This feature is provided out of the box by WebLogic Server:
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs103/config_wls/web_server.html#wp1059425
Above all, look at extended log format. I guess you will find it useful.
If you won't be happy with this feature, you can still think about using a web server (or anything else that can log for you) as a proxy in front of OSB. That's what I prefer personally. For example using Apache HTTP Server (with WebLogic plugin) will provide you with capabilities to log anything you want.

Similar Messages

OSB Service Processing time

Dear all,
we have requirement to find out OSB Service Processing time. can you please suggest how we can get this information using OSB Console or if ther are any JMX Api available to get this data.
requirement is: to know the actual execution time in OSB Request processing time.(should not include target system processing time)
thanks in advance.
pr

PR,
You can use inbuilt service monitoring (Oracle Service Bus Monitoring Framework) functionality to find out the same...
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/doc.1111/e15867/monitoring_ops.htm#i1086439
Service Health tab shows Service level metrics in the Oracle Service Bus Dashboard...
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/doc.1111/e15867/monitoring_ops.htm#i1107760
Hope it helps !!
Regards,
Abhinav Gupta

Management Services Response Time; per Role or per Deployment? Broken?

Management Services, Alert on Response Time, appears to be incorrect.
Can you help me understand why the Response Time charts for each Role in a deployment are identical? is this a bug?
My Testing
I have 3 Roles in my Cloud Service Deployment. A Web Role, a worker Role, and an extra Worker Role for this test.
Web Role: Light load 0 to 10 requests per hour.
Worker Role: Generates massive net work traffic. Constantly making web service calls to 3rd party data services & running a Distributed Azure Data Cache.
Extra Worker Role: No load. I added it to test this problem. It does nothing other than respond to Management Services Alert pings.
I created 3 Alerts to Track response time. One to each of the 3 roles, testing from within the same data center; San Jose to San Jose. Then added 3 more to test from Singapore to San Jose.
The Result (over several Months)
A. The San Jose charts are identical for each role.
B. The Singapore charts are identical for each role.
C. The set of Singapore charts are very similar to the San Jose set of charts. With slight variations likely due to internet latency & extra load at Singapore.
D. (most Important). The latency is directly correlated to the network load created by the Worker Role. When I turn it off or throttle it, Response Time on all boxes drops. When working at "full speed" network response time rises
to 10 - 30 secs. (very bad)
Conclusion
The Network Monitoring Response Time Alert is not working as designed. It does not show the Response Time for that Role. But seems to be displaying the Response Time for the whole deployment.
My Request
Can you assist me to understand if this is "By Design". If my testing is flawed? or what is going on.
My Goal
Alert the Azure dev team to this so that maybe they can fix it to function as I expected it to. (or for them to explain why my expectations are unreasonable.)
Why is this important?
Poor Network Perf is a showstopper bug that is preventing us from moving into production. I may be able to solve this with multiple instances. But as I lack the granularity to track even at the Role level. I'm stuck.

Thank you for your reply.
I forgot to update this with the answer.
It turned out that Azure Portal's Create Alert/monitoring UI has a bug.
The monitoring service is only capable of pining your public endpoints. ie: your Web Roles. Yet it lets you think you can create an Alert to monitor any of the roles within your solution. To make things worse, it shows a chart that suggests it actually is
pinging your worker roles, when it is actually only pinging the public Web Role.
That is why all the Roles in your solution display identical metrics regardless of their load. Even stopping your worker roles will not affect their ping response times.
If your worker role fails, Azure Alerts don't tell you about it.
NB: Using Application Insights to create alerting does not have this issue. But only because it doesn't attempt to monitor your web roles, not because it can alert you to any issues.

Poor service response times

My entire system has crashed, no tv, no telephone and no internet! The power supply for the fios equipment has failed, and I have to wait two days for a service call that will only take 5 minutes to fix! **bleep**! Thank God my commitment is over and my Direct Tv dish is still up! Thanks for nothing! !!

That the hallmark of Verizon.
A Verizon service tech came out to my neighborhood on a Saturday afternoon and was working on the main fiber distro box and UNPLUGED my line when he was doing what ever it was he was supposed to be doing (he should have messed with me at all). I know this because I was walking my dogs and walked past him as he was opening the box and playing with the mess of yellow fiber lines, unpluging and pluging back in (which he shouldn't have been doing at all).
He left at about 4pm and I discovered the loss of service about 15-30 minutes later. NO PHONE, NO TV, NO INTERNET!
I was on my cell phone on hold for 30 minutes before getting a tech wasted about an hour going through their "standard troubleshooting checklist" having me unplug the battery to reset the box etc... finally he realized what I was saying that the service tech effected my fiber connection/service, but couldn't get the tech back out since he had gone home!!!!!
The earliest they could schedule a tech to come out and fix it was late Monday evening to reconnect my service at the distro box. The tech asked where my ONT box was at and I gave him detailed information about where it was at and how to get to it, since he said he had no idea when the tech would be out and they they wouldn't need to enter the house. I wasn't happy spending the weekend with no TV, no Phone, no Internet, but really didn't have a choice.
Monday comes and I get a text message saying the tech came and left because no one was at home (my roommate was at home but the tech didn't ring the doorbell to get his attention upstairs). He didn't even check the connection at the distro box (which was the only problem) and was clearly written up in the tech order. I call VZ from my cell phone and was on hold for almost an hour before I finally got to talk to a human who proceeded to tell me I should have been home and it was my fault. and that I'd have to wait until Thursday before they could get a tech out.
I lost it and demanded to speak to his supervisor and waited another 45 minutes before the supervisor finally got on the phone with me and after 15 minute discussion he was able to get a tech scheduled to come out the next day (Tuesday).
The tech came out and spent a whole 10 minutes on site and all he did was plug the fiber for my house back into the distro panel.
Oh and VZ made me call separately to customer service to get a billing adjustment for the days I didn't have FIOS service and it was like pulling teeth and all they offered was an adjustment for the 3 days of service that was interrupted. When I got the bill I saw they only it applied it to the bare basic services and charged me full price for all the premium movie services even though they weren't available.
VZ still hasn't a clue about customer service. They had the chance to fix it by sendng the tech back out to fix his error that night, and ending it with no issue. But no, they dragged it out and got all typical VZ "we can't attitude" and inconvienced me for 4 days and I had to burn up several hours of my cell minutes to be on hold and fight with VZ to get them to fix their problem, and they talk to me like they are doing me a BIG favor by crediting me the prorated charge for the days they interrupted my FIOS service...
I was bragging about my FIOS service to my friends and co-workers, but after the HORRIBLE experience, I recommend everyone to stick with cable and pass on FIOS, since you can't trust the service. If you can get Dish or DirecTV then go for it.

Webservice response times --How can we improve ?

Hi All,
I am making two different calls to a Function module from java
1. web service 2. Jco
When I go to STAD transaction i can see webservice response timings are more compared to Jco.
What intresting here for is CPU timings and DB timings.
Some case The DB timings for webservice 3 to 4 times more than Jco .
Ideally DB timings should be similar in both the cases..right ??
CPU timngs also more in webservice ? Why ? How we optimze this for good performance of web service ??
My webservice is simple one conatins 4 input parmaters (simple type) retuening a simple structure.
Jco response time is around 500-2000 (ms)
web service response time is 2000-5000 (ms)
Looking for expert suggestions from our community
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,Anilkumar

hi,
JCo is an native binary RFC oder FastRFC, walks through the Gateway,
Webservice are textoriented, more Overhead and in summary with still less performance,
walks through the ICM
e.g. RFC-Connections are ca. 10 times faster than Webservices!

OSB - Service Invocation instance response times

Hi,
In my research and discussion with OSB vendor team, I found there is no product feature to gather statistics on per invocation response times for a OSB service.
My requirement is to gather per invocation response time of service. I am contemplating few ways of doing this
1. Java call outs before the start and end of service.
Downside of this approach is in my composite service (composing 10 biz services) with challenging response time requirements, it might be a over head to wrap each biz service with java call outs for measurements. Any thots?
2. There is a report feature in OSB. How about using SNMP traps for reporting the start and ends. I am wondering if this is any better than java call outs which might be synchronous I/O operation.
Do you folks see alternate approaches?
TIA

I think that generally it's not a good idea to modify production logic (code or configuration) to gather any statistics. It may look simple, but there is still possibility of unexpected failure that would cause failure of your service. Not to mention complexity of such a step.*
I totally agree.
This kind of data should be gathered from your infrastructure components. I know that OSB doesn't provide such a feature, but if you have your services published on HTTP protocol, than you can always use some kind of proxy server. In our company, we use feature-rich Apache HTTP server for many reasons. Response time logging is one of such reasons.*
Interesting. Thanks. This approach might help gather stats on the Proxy services. However the biz services composed inside proxy may not get the stats.
Another possibility is to use a specialized component. I think that OWSM can be useful. However, I don't have any experience with it and it could be overkill considering your needs. http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/webservices_manager/index.html*
We are looking into OWSM, as you rightly said, wanted to keep it simple without OWSM.
Thanks

OSB - Response timer when business service call external webservice slowly.

I am a new bie about OSB, i am developing and testing business service OSB call external webservice. When i test by business service on osb console then time response is 10s, but when i program by C# call external webservice then time response is 0,000026s.
pls help me.

I am a new bie about OSB, i am developing and testing business service OSB call external webservice. When i test by business service on osb console then time response is 10s, but when i program by C# call external webservice then time response is 0,000026s.
pls help me.

Difference between max response time of operation and service.

Hi All,
I am using ALSB to implement SOA.While monitoring the statistics for a proxy service based on WSDL (web service) ,noticed one thing that max response time of a service operation is different than max response time for that particular service.E.g max response time for one of the operation is 3462 (ms) where as max response time for that service was 4467 (ms).
Can any one help me to identify why there is difference between these two?

I have also noticed this inconsistence. There is probably no explanation in OSB (ALSB) documentation, so I can only guess. Maybe OSB starts to measure response time for service earlier then for an operation. The reason for that could be that OSB can identify service (based on endpoint) earlier then operation (based on request data which have to be parsed first). This could cause a difference in response times. However, this difference should be much smaller than a second (your case). In my case it is usually a matter of few milliseconds.
Please remember that all of above is just my imagination. :-)

Service Profile Response time values from CRM

Hi experts,
I want to capture RESPONSE TIME from SERVICE PROFILE values defined in CRM system.If you refer CRMD_SERV_SLA transaction then you can find the defined values. In 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H Catalog, Code group, Code these values are appearing but I unable to find RESPONSE TIME value.
Has anybody tried capturing response time value in BW? or is there any other field shows this value in Data Source?
Regards,
Priyanka Joshi

Hi experts,
to get these values RESPONSE PROFILE value must be maintained in the Transaction but in our system its not available so I used SAP Exit to get the value and solved the problem.
Regards,
Priyanka Joshi

Getting "OSB Service Callout action received SOAP Fault response" on trying to invoke a service using service callout

I'm trying to invoke a search service using service callout . However on trying to test it , I'm getting this response
<con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context">
<con:errorCode>BEA-382500</con:errorCode>
<con:reason>
OSB Service Callout action received SOAP Fault response
</con:reason>
<con:details>
<con1:ReceivedFaultDetail xmlns:con1="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config">
<con1:faultcode xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">soapenv:Client</con1:faultcode>
<con1:faultstring>Cannot find dispatch method for {}</con1:faultstring>
<con1:http-response-code>500</con1:http-response-code>
</con1:ReceivedFaultDetail>
Please help in resolving this error.
Thanks,
Rohit

you are calling wrong the Service.
¿what kind of service do you have? RPC? Document?
ir your target service its document, I recommend this:
1. Test target service with OSB
2. copy XML request and XML response from the test.
3. use XML request format that you got at Step 2 in your source service and using it at your "Service Callout".

BEA-382501- OSB Service Callout action received an unrecognized response

Hi,
I am getting the above response while executing the proxy service which is based on http protocol.
I am able to get the proper response through the business service, but the same i am not able to get in proxy service.
For this I have configured one business service based on below parameters.
Service Type Any XML Service
Transport Configuration
Protocol http
Load Balancing Algorithm round-robin
Endpoint URI http://01hw146484:8080/SpringFileUpload/testservlet?name=pratik
Retry Count 0
Retry Iteration Interval 30
Retry Application Errors Yes
HTTP Transport Configuration
Read Timeout 0
Connection Timeout 0
HTTP Request Method GET
Authentication None
Proxy Server
Follow HTTP redirects Disabled
Use Chunked Streaming Mode Enabled
Proxy service on below parameters:
Service Type Any XML Service
Transport Configuration
Protocol http
Endpoint URI /SMSProxy/PS_SMS_BasedOnBS
Get All Headers No
Headers
HTTP Transport Configuration
HTTPS required No
Authentication None
Message Handling Configuration
Transaction Required Disabled
Same Transaction For Response Disabled
Content Streaming Disabled
XOP/MTOM Support Disabled
Page Attachments to Disk No
I am using service call out to call the business service, but not able to get the any response using the proxy. my business service is working properly.
Please let me know where i am doing mistake.
Edited by: truptipatil on Jan 12, 2012 3:07 PM

Hi,
even if I am adding a service error handler, I am getting the same error, I don't why proxy is not able to get the proper response.
I am getting the below error.
<BEA-000000> < [PipelinePairNode1, PipelinePairNode1_request, stage1, ERROR] <con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context">
<con:errorCode>BEA-382501</con:errorCode>
<con:reason>OSB Service Callout action received an unrecognized response</con:reason>
<con:details>
<con1:UnrecognizedResponseDetail xmlns:con1="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config">
<con1:http-response-code>200</con1:http-response-code>
</con1:UnrecognizedResponseDetail>
</con:details>
<con:location>
<con:node>PipelinePairNode1</con:node>
<con:pipeline>PipelinePairNode1_request</con:pipeline>
<con:stage>stage1</con:stage>
<con:path>request-pipeline</con:path>
</con:location>
</con:fault>>
Any help in this regards, is highly appreciated.

Date&time Calculation with respect to Service&Response Profile

Hi all,
The scenario is - we are creating service request which is having service profile and response profile , according to these the First response time and to do by time are getting calculated. In this calculation system is considering the week ends,working hours per day and holidays ( which are defined in customizing).
Now i want to do the same kind of calculation for some other purpose. like i have two timestamps i want to find exact time difference between those two by considering service profile and response profile.
Example:
Let's consider my service profile is 5X8 ( Mon - Friday and 8 hours per Day 09:00:00 to 17:00:00)
and the response profile is 10X15 ( response should be in 10 hours and to be completed by 15 Hours )
Suppose I'm creating the Service request by 23.03.2010 09:00:00 then system will give the response time like
24.03.2010 11:00:00 ( on or before )
( it took 8 hours from 23.03.2010 and 2 hours from 24.03.2010 )
Please give idea to get this logic how system calculates by considering service profile and response profile.
Regards
Chand

Hi chand,
Whateever logic you have told is 80 % correct. But you also need to consider the following thing.
1. You need to define the factoy calender cosidering the holiday in the t code SCAL. and that need to be attched to your service profile
2. Suppose your first respose time is 10 hours and 1st resolution time is 15 hours, it also needs to consider the holidays.
Eg. if the Service call come on friday at 3.00PM , then the resopnse should go by Monday 5.00PM. Response will be by 2.00 PM on Tuesday (Provided these days are not the hoildays).
Hope this clears your doubts.
Regards,
Uday Borse

Response time increase in OSB

Dear all,
While performing the Load test, during initial 2 - 3 hrs performance is very good. after 2 -3 hrs response time increasing and there by throughput going down 4 times.
when i check in GC Log, i found all OC's. generally i used to find many YC's and very less OC's. but this time its deferent. not sure why this behaviour.
Below is snap shot of my gc.log.
Following are my startManagedweblogic java options.
JAVA_OPTIONS="${JAVA_OPTIONS} -Xverbose:memory -Xmx:6144m -Xms:6144m -Xns:3072m -Xverbosetimestamp -Xgcprio:pausetime -Xverboselog:/usr/home/WEBADM/blq2gsbl/BLQRYSBDM/bin/gc.log -Xverbose:gcreport -XlargePages -XXgcThreads:8 -XXtlasize:min=2k,preferred=16k -XXnoSystemGC"
please note that i have enough memory to increase till 12 gb also. i found better performance with 6g so i kept it as 6.
[WARN ] Use of -Djrockit.optfile is deprecated and discouraged.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:11 2013][16261] Running with 32 bit heap and compressed references supporting 32GB heap.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:11 2013][16261] Using 256MB pages for Java heap.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] GC mode: Garbage collection optimized for short pausetimes, strategy: Generational Concurrent Mark & Sweep.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] Heap size: 6291456KB, maximal heap size: 6291456KB, nursery size: 3145728KB.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <start>-<end>: <type> <before>KB-><after>KB (<heap>KB), <time> ms, sum of pauses <pause> ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <start> - start time of collection (seconds since jvm start).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <type>   - OC (old collection) or YC (young collection).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <end>    - end time of collection (seconds since jvm start).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <before> - memory used by objects before collection (KB).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <after> - memory used by objects after collection (KB).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <heap>   - size of heap after collection (KB).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <time>   - total time of collection (milliseconds).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261] <pause> - total sum of pauses during collection (milliseconds).
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:34:12 2013][16261]            Run with -Xverbose:gcpause to see individual phases.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:49:59 2013][16261] [YC#1] 947.689-948.011: YC 3426740KB->1274833KB (6291456KB), 0.323 s, sum of pauses 322.080 ms, longest pause 322.080 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:50:18 2013][16261] [YC#2] 966.433-966.521: YC 3700241KB->1381022KB (6291456KB), 0.088 s, sum of pauses 87.355 ms, longest pause 87.355 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:50:33 2013][16261] [YC#3] 981.691-981.734: YC 3806640KB->1448962KB (6291456KB), 0.043 s, sum of pauses 42.316 ms, longest pause 42.316 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:50:48 2013][16261] [YC#4] 996.195-996.232: YC 3876151KB->1518729KB (6291456KB), 0.037 s, sum of pauses 36.360 ms, longest pause 36.360 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:51:03 2013][16261] [YC#5] 1011.797-1011.833: YC 3950327KB->1592393KB (6291456KB), 0.036 s, sum of pauses 35.004 ms, longest pause 35.004 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:51:19 2013][16261] [YC#6] 1027.447-1027.489: YC 4022805KB->1665479KB (6291456KB), 0.041 s, sum of pauses 40.711 ms, longest pause 40.711 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:51:34 2013][16261] [YC#7] 1043.090-1043.127: YC 4097355KB->1739629KB (6291456KB), 0.037 s, sum of pauses 35.984 ms, longest pause 35.984 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:51:50 2013][16261] [YC#8] 1058.656-1058.704: YC 4171396KB->1814054KB (6291456KB), 0.047 s, sum of pauses 46.695 ms, longest pause 46.695 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:52:00 2013][16261] [YC#9] 1068.490-1068.533: YC 4245475KB->1887941KB (6291456KB), 0.043 s, sum of pauses 42.002 ms, longest pause 42.002 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:52:09 2013][16261] [YC#10] 1077.381-1077.421: YC 4318167KB->1961481KB (6291456KB), 0.041 s, sum of pauses 39.592 ms, longest pause 39.592 ms.
[memory ][Mon Aug 12 12:52:19 2013][16261] [YC#11] 1087.366-1087.406: YC 4394185KB->2036571KB (6291456KB), 0.039 s, sum of pauses 38.757 ms
87.597 ms, longest pause 50.632 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:28 2013][16261] [OC#9822] 107234.509-107237.018: OC 893216KB->845338KB (6291456KB), 2.509 s, sum of pauses 536.399 ms, longest pause 504.274 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:31 2013][16261] [OC#9823] 107237.419-107239.864: OC 1116022KB->860547KB (6291456KB), 2.445 s, sum of pauses 414.935 ms, longest pause 354.974 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:34 2013][16261] [OC#9824] 107239.864-107242.447: OC 949080KB->878533KB (6291456KB), 2.583 s, sum of pauses 541.277 ms, longest pause 504.113 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:37 2013][16261] [OC#9825] 107242.447-107245.494: OC 953535KB->860560KB (6291456KB), 3.047 s, sum of pauses 633.955 ms, longest pause 504.806 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:39 2013][16261] [OC#9826] 107245.494-107247.971: OC 1054631KB->869654KB (6291456KB), 2.478 s, sum of pauses 541.422 ms, longest pause 504.193 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:42 2013][16261] [OC#9827] 107247.972-107250.441: OC 921210KB->857407KB (6291456KB), 2.469 s, sum of pauses 483.940 ms, longest pause 440.031 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:45 2013][16261] [OC#9828] 107250.792-107253.213: OC 1132559KB->875285KB (6291456KB), 2.422 s, sum of pauses 524.526 ms, longest pause 487.132 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:47 2013][16261] [OC#9829] 107253.213-107255.610: OC 899114KB->855957KB (6291456KB), 2.397 s, sum of pauses 481.233 ms, longest pause 451.024 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:50 2013][16261] [OC#9830] 107256.011-107258.297: OC 1127479KB->868126KB (6291456KB), 2.286 s, sum of pauses 373.648 ms, longest pause 336.646 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:52 2013][16261] [OC#9831] 107258.298-107260.847: OC 912365KB->856462KB (6291456KB), 2.550 s, sum of pauses 526.103 ms, longest pause 492.768 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:55 2013][16261] [OC#9832] 107261.098-107263.611: OC 1044068KB->863005KB (6291456KB), 2.513 s, sum of pauses 541.427 ms, longest pause 504.196 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:21:57 2013][16261] [OC#9833] 107263.611-107265.846: OC 902510KB->847460KB (6291456KB), 2.235 s, sum of pauses 213.535 ms, longest pause 179.799 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:00 2013][16261] [OC#9834] 107265.946-107268.356: OC 974573KB->863254KB (6291456KB), 2.409 s, sum of pauses 441.951 ms, longest pause 405.552 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:02 2013][16261] [OC#9835] 107268.556-107271.134: OC 1013772KB->856892KB (6291456KB), 2.578 s, sum of pauses 542.932 ms, longest pause 503.782 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:05 2013][16261] [OC#9836] 107271.134-107273.302: OC 946088KB->860358KB (6291456KB), 2.168 s, sum of pauses 220.883 ms, longest pause 182.948 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:07 2013][16261] [OC#9837] 107273.552-107275.500: OC 1010670KB->854399KB (6291456KB), 1.948 s, sum of pauses 120.783 ms, longest pause 56.691 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:09 2013][16261] [OC#9838] 107275.501-107277.801: OC 906839KB->850508KB (6291456KB), 2.301 s, sum of pauses 399.919 ms, longest pause 367.834 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:11 2013][16261] [OC#9839] 107278.052-107280.071: OC 1045319KB->862319KB (6291456KB), 2.019 s, sum of pauses 144.317 ms, longest pause 75.239 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:14 2013][16261] [OC#9840] 107280.071-107282.578: OC 887997KB->849438KB (6291456KB), 2.507 s, sum of pauses 537.495 ms, longest pause 504.761 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:16 2013][16261] [OC#9841] 107282.879-107284.888: OC 1061809KB->860007KB (6291456KB), 2.009 s, sum of pauses 137.893 ms, longest pause 63.667 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:19 2013][16261] [OC#9842] 107284.888-107287.367: OC 908775KB->852632KB (6291456KB), 2.479 s, sum of pauses 541.465 ms, longest pause 504.889 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:21 2013][16261] [OC#9843] 107287.517-107289.881: OC 1005267KB->849986KB (6291456KB), 2.364 s, sum of pauses 160.999 ms, longest pause 86.633 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:24 2013][16261] [OC#9844] 107289.881-107292.353: OC 907985KB->848410KB (6291456KB), 2.472 s, sum of pauses 540.357 ms, longest pause 504.985 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:26 2013][16261] [OC#9845] 107292.353-107294.314: OC 916160KB->850798KB (6291456KB), 1.961 s, sum of pauses 104.840 ms, longest pause 66.068 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:28 2013][16261] [OC#9846] 107294.364-107296.780: OC 923551KB->849834KB (6291456KB), 2.416 s, sum of pauses 440.677 ms, longest pause 403.477 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:30 2013][16261] [OC#9847] 107296.931-107299.111: OC 997464KB->858904KB (6291456KB), 2.180 s, sum of pauses 246.058 ms, longest pause 206.937 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:33 2013][16261] [OC#9848] 107299.111-107301.563: OC 903415KB->851026KB (6291456KB), 2.452 s, sum of pauses 540.845 ms, longest pause 504.318 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:35 2013][16261] [OC#9849] 107301.814-107303.861: OC 1013878KB->857614KB (6291456KB), 2.048 s, sum of pauses 94.386 ms, longest pause 53.197 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:38 2013][16261] [OC#9850] 107303.861-107306.212: OC 887706KB->860005KB (6291456KB), 2.350 s, sum of pauses 346.029 ms, longest pause 311.092 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:40 2013][16261] [OC#9851] 107306.262-107308.853: OC 937699KB->860853KB (6291456KB), 2.591 s, sum of pauses 557.007 ms, longest pause 501.625 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:43 2013][16261] [OC#9852] 107308.853-107311.426: OC 951313KB->870294KB (6291456KB), 2.573 s, sum of pauses 541.352 ms, longest pause 504.381 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:45 2013][16261] [OC#9853] 107311.426-107314.144: OC 909609KB->852710KB (6291456KB), 2.718 s, sum of pauses 583.129 ms, longest pause 504.576 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:48 2013][16261] [OC#9854] 107314.144-107316.628: OC 969124KB->858298KB (6291456KB), 2.484 s, sum of pauses 542.151 ms, longest pause 504.257 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:50 2013][16261] [OC#9855] 107316.628-107319.114: OC 915682KB->849121KB (6291456KB), 2.486 s, sum of pauses 495.272 ms, longest pause 447.599 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:53 2013][16261] [OC#9856] 107319.314-107321.936: OC 1006620KB->861443KB (6291456KB), 2.621 s, sum of pauses 544.915 ms, longest pause 504.410 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:56 2013][16261] [OC#9857] 107321.936-107324.410: OC 922270KB->852766KB (6291456KB), 2.474 s, sum of pauses 541.767 ms, longest pause 504.142 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:22:58 2013][16261] [OC#9858] 107324.610-107327.023: OC 1039488KB->861496KB (6291456KB), 2.413 s, sum of pauses 542.856 ms, longest pause 504.187 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:01 2013][16261] [OC#9859] 107327.023-107329.315: OC 918829KB->843657KB (6291456KB), 2.292 s, sum of pauses 321.525 ms, longest pause 286.826 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:03 2013][16261] [OC#9860] 107329.616-107332.141: OC 1069773KB->863389KB (6291456KB), 2.525 s, sum of pauses 548.231 ms, longest pause 504.177 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:06 2013][16261] [OC#9861] 107332.141-107334.343: OC 915522KB->853889KB (6291456KB), 2.202 s, sum of pauses 189.135 ms, longest pause 153.663 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:08 2013][16261] [OC#9862] 107334.644-107337.056: OC 1032066KB->868736KB (6291456KB), 2.412 s, sum of pauses 545.438 ms, longest pause 504.254 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:11 2013][16261] [OC#9863] 107337.056-107339.296: OC 915783KB->864080KB (6291456KB), 2.240 s, sum of pauses 298.272 ms, longest pause 263.347 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:13 2013][16261] [OC#9864] 107339.597-107341.923: OC 1011429KB->878520KB (6291456KB), 2.326 s, sum of pauses 456.568 ms, longest pause 419.025 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:15 2013][16261] [OC#9865] 107341.923-107343.934: OC 919359KB->840367KB (6291456KB), 2.011 s, sum of pauses 125.250 ms, longest pause 57.223 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:18 2013][16261] [OC#9866] 107344.185-107346.733: OC 1012840KB->874965KB (6291456KB), 2.548 s, sum of pauses 540.636 ms, longest pause 504.970 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:20 2013][16261] [OC#9867] 107346.750-107348.793: OC 933751KB->854858KB (6291456KB), 2.043 s, sum of pauses 156.099 ms, longest pause 82.344 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:23 2013][16261] [OC#9868] 107348.793-107351.335: OC 887450KB->867195KB (6291456KB), 2.542 s, sum of pauses 537.543 ms, longest pause 504.801 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:25 2013][16261] [OC#9869] 107351.486-107353.546: OC 996281KB->860628KB (6291456KB), 2.060 s, sum of pauses 160.157 ms, longest pause 73.442 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:27 2013][16261] [OC#9870] 107353.546-107356.073: OC 906961KB->872330KB (6291456KB), 2.527 s, sum of pauses 539.374 ms, longest pause 504.913 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:30 2013][16261] [OC#9871] 107356.273-107358.702: OC 996457KB->851473KB (6291456KB), 2.429 s, sum of pauses 166.761 ms, longest pause 86.493 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:33 2013][16261] [OC#9872] 107358.703-107361.265: OC 907359KB->863117KB (6291456KB), 2.562 s, sum of pauses 541.203 ms, longest pause 504.927 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:35 2013][16261] [OC#9873] 107361.265-107363.378: OC 912545KB->853583KB (6291456KB), 2.113 s, sum of pauses 112.867 ms, longest pause 69.906 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:37 2013][16261] [OC#9874] 107363.379-107365.933: OC 919557KB->864998KB (6291456KB), 2.554 s, sum of pauses 543.605 ms, longest pause 504.637 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:39 2013][16261] [OC#9875] 107365.983-107368.091: OC 958748KB->857127KB (6291456KB), 2.108 s, sum of pauses 252.535 ms, longest pause 215.897 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:42 2013][16261] [OC#9876] 107368.342-107370.827: OC 999403KB->865783KB (6291456KB), 2.485 s, sum of pauses 540.028 ms, longest pause 504.197 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:44 2013][16261] [OC#9877] 107370.827-107372.683: OC 923670KB->857704KB (6291456KB), 1.856 s, sum of pauses 87.595 ms, longest pause 52.619 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:47 2013][16261] [OC#9878] 107372.883-107375.283: OC 985737KB->859804KB (6291456KB), 2.399 s, sum of pauses 487.291 ms, longest pause 451.118 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:49 2013][16261] [OC#9879] 107375.283-107377.932: OC 915211KB->853184KB (6291456KB), 2.649 s, sum of pauses 555.557 ms, longest pause 504.480 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:52 2013][16261] [OC#9880] 107377.932-107380.212: OC 1009969KB->874361KB (6291456KB), 2.279 s, sum of pauses 375.384 ms, longest pause 335.326 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:54 2013][16261] [OC#9881] 107380.212-107382.461: OC 914805KB->855458KB (6291456KB), 2.249 s, sum of pauses 288.521 ms, longest pause 250.881 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:56 2013][16261] [OC#9882] 107382.562-107384.892: OC 966755KB->867614KB (6291456KB), 2.330 s, sum of pauses 500.018 ms, longest pause 463.414 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:23:59 2013][16261] [OC#9883] 107384.942-107387.565: OC 932206KB->853768KB (6291456KB), 2.622 s, sum of pauses 565.151 ms, longest pause 504.160 ms.
[memory ][Tue Aug 13 18:24:01 2013][16261] [OC#9884] 107387.565-107389.985: OC 958792KB->862315KB (6291456KB), 2.421 s, sum of pauses 461.570 ms, longest pause 420.545 ms.

You need to find out the error code you get in fault due to response timeout. (run a test using test console and you would get that)
In error handler of stage from where you are calling this business service, check whether status code in $fault is equal to the error code due to response timeout. If it is equal then replace content of $body with required error xml and use reply with success.
See section "37.6 Fault Variable" to know more about $fault -
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e15867/context.htm#i1051956
Regards,
Anuj

Response time in web services

I have a simple calculator web service running on tomcat server. On the client side, I have a loop in which I randomly select 2 operators and an operand and invoke the calculator web service.
I was conducting tests by invoking the web service within a loop. I observed that as the number of requests increased the response time reduced. I am unable to figure out why this happens.
Any help would be appreciated.

For monitoring BPEL orchestrated services (process status, activity, variables, suspend/resume/terminate instances), we have open source bpel monitor API and command line tool. We are working on a graphic version of BPEL monitor, but you can find a simple one contributed by a member in the community:
http://wiki.open-esb.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=BPELMonitor
Regards,
Mei

Apple service request response time.

I recently requested a warranty service for my iPod in Singapore. Immediately after filling in all the details, etc. they said they would send me an e-mail with further instructions. That was several weeks ago, and I still have received no such e-mail.(hopefully i didn't enter the wrong email address). The status check merely states "Dispatch Sent".
My question is: what is the average response time for warranty service for an iPod shuffle and what do they mean by "Dispatch sent". I have after all, not received a replace ment.
Please give me your feedback, thanks.

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
You should get a box in a few business days and then have your iPod back in a week!
Call apple...
http://www.apple.com/contact/phone_contacts.html
btabz

OSB Service Response times

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for