OSB support database write operation

Hi,
I am using OSB 10.3 in weblogic 10.3. I have a scenario like below.
Using a proxy service to read messages from a JMS queue. After reading the message I want to write the message content to the database table. Is it possible in OSB 10.3. If yes, could you please guide me how to do it.
Thanks

Hi,
Please refer -
http://biemond.blogspot.com/2009/06/osb-1031-with-database-adapter.html
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/jcatransport/transport.html
Regards,
Anuj

Similar Messages

SP1 to R2 Upgrade - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database

Hello,
Am trying to upgrade a SCOM SP1 environment to SCOM R2( 3 MGT servers, 1 GW and 2 Web console boxes )
The prerequisites are failing and it is stating the following ;
Operational Database SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the operational database
Data Warehouse SQL Version Check - The installed Version of SQL Server is not supported for the data warehouse
The SQL servers are running SQL 2012 SP1 64 Enterprise, which is compatible.
All other pre-upgrade tasks have been done.
Help appreciated!

I'm having the exact same issue, I believe. I think that Tubble has problem with SCOM 2012. Not 2007.
I've checked the compatibility list for both SCOM 2012 SP1 and R2. All newer Windows Server and SQL versions are supported. We're running the SQL 2012 SP1 x64 Standard edition on a Windows Server 2012 Standard.
I even tried to move the database from SQL 2012 to an older SQL 2008 R2, but that's not supported either. Only upgrading. Not downgrading.
So, I started checking the opsMgrSetupWizard.log file for clues. And the error message was there as well. But the reason why it says not supported is that it can't get the info about the OS version, so I guess it assumes the OS version is to low. The RPC
service can not be reached.
[10:29:11]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:11]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:11]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:11]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:11]: Error: :<![CDATA[CheckPrerequisites: Logic Type:and IsValidOMDBSQLVersionCheck: 2]]>
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Error: :CheckPrerequisites: OMDBSqlVersionCheckTitle: Failed
[10:29:11]: Error: :
[10:29:11]: Debug: :**************************************************
[10:29:33]: Error: :GetRemoteOSVersion(): Threw Exception.Type: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException, Exception Error Code: 0x800706BA, Exception.Message: The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
[10:29:33]: Error: :StackTrace: at System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ThrowExceptionForHRInternal(Int32 errorCode, IntPtr errorInfo)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.InitializeGuts(Object o)
at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Initialize()
at System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher.Get()
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.OperationsManager.Setup.Common.SetupValidationHelpers.GetRemoteOSVersion(String remoteComputer)
[10:29:33]: Debug: :IsSQLOnAValidComputer: remote OS version string was null or empty.
[10:29:33]: Error: :Error:IsValidSQLVersionCheck: SqlServer OS version is too low.
[10:29:33]: Debug: :**************************************************
So, in our case this was just a FW that was blocking some high ports between management server and SQL. I believe TCP port 135 also needs to be open.
Let's hope this fixes your issue as well, Tubble.
Have a great day!

Oracle coherence first read/write operation take more time

I'm currently testing with oracle coherence Java and C++ version and from both versions for writing to any local or distributed or near cache first read/write operation take more time compared to next consecutive read/write operation. Is this because of boost operations happening inside actual HashMap or serialization or memory mapped implementation. What are the techniques which we can use to improve the performance with this first read/write operation?
Currently I'm doing a single read/write operation after fetching the NamedCache Instance. Please let me know whether there's any other boosting coherence cache techniques available.

In which case, why bother using Coherence? You're not really gaining anything, are you?
What I'm trying to explain is that you're probably not going to get that "micro-second" level performance on a fully configured Coherence cluster, running across multiple machines, going via proxies for c++ clients. Coherence is designed to be a scalable, fault-tolerant, distributed caching/processing system. It's not really designed for real-time, guaranteed, nano-second/micro-second level processing. There are much better product stacks out there for that type of processing if that is your ultimate goal, IMHO.
As you say, just writing to a small, local Map (or array, List, Set, etc.) in a local JVM is always going to be very fast - literally as fast as the processor running in the machine. But that's not really the focus of a product like Coherence. It isn't trying to "out gun" what you can achieve on one machine doing simple processing; Coherence is designed for scalability rather than outright performance. Of course, the use of local caches (including Coherence's near caching or replicated caching), can get you back some of the performance you've "lost" in a distributed system, but it's all relative.
If you wander over to a few of the CUG presentations and attend a few CUG meetings, one of the first things the support guys will tell you is "benchmark on a proper cluster" and not "on a localised development machine". Why? Because the difference in scalability and performance will be huge. I'm not really trying to deter you from Coherence, but I don't think it's going to meet you requirements when fully configured in a cluster of "1 Micro seconds for 100000 data collection" on a continuous basis.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Steve
NB. I don't work for Oracle, so maybe they have a different opinion. :)

NFC tags read/write operations on low level

Hi,
I know this is little bit offtopic question - but since you are experts in the area I will try to ask you probably a pretty simple question:
1/ I would like to know which protocol is used for the read/write operations to the NFC tags are used. According to my understanding after the tag is placed on the NFC reader (NFC phone, USB reader), it is powered and set to the ready state. Then the application protocol for read/write operation is used. As I think the exact format and the content of commands used for read/write is not specified in ISO 14443 and it is dependent on a tag hardware/manufacturer and will be different for FeliCa/Mifare/Innovision/etc. tags, so there is no way how to handle NFC tags read/write operations with the single implementation. Is that assumption correct?
2/ Are there any tags, which supports the APDU 7816-4 commands for read/write operations?
Thank you for reply
Kind regards,
STeN

hello,
you have to read the NFC forum specs. all of this will be better explained than by me.
more than one protocol are used according the the contactless front end configuration and abilities. It includes ISO14443-A, ISO14443-B and Felica. Sometimes other protocols are also available, for example Innovatron (not Innovision lol)
Mifare is not a protocol, it is a line of NXP products. These products use the lower layers of the ISO14443-A protocol specification.
There are 4 types of tags
1) using the lower layers of ISO14443-A
2) using the lower layers of ISO14443-B
3) something related to felica?
not sure exactly about these 3, you have to read the specs. Everything is clearly understandable, not like ETSI.
4) something using ISO7816-4 commands on top of ISO14443 A or B or others. You have SELECT, READ BINARY, UPDATE BINARY. You can implement that using javacard, I did it and it works. You need two binary files, that can be hardcoded.
Regards
Sebastien

BPEL registry integration cache capability?ESB or OSB support WS-Addressing

Hi ,
I have few questions related to Oracle SOA Suite.
Please suugest me
1) How to handle BPEL dehydration in high volume operations?
2) Memory overload of ESB in high volume operations?
3) BPEL registry integration - cache capability?
4) How Oracle ESB or OSB support WS-Addressing?
Suggestions or docs reference will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Sachin

Hi,
There's a lot of performance info in the SOA Suite Best Practices Guide. More specifically see chapter 2.17 and 10 of http://download.oracle.com/technology/tech/soa/soa_best_practices_1013x_drop3.pdf.
For correlation between OSB and BPEL using WS-Addressing see http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/bpelpmtransport/transport.html.
Regards, Ronald

LabVIEW VI For CANopen SDO Segmented and BLOCK Transfer Write operation needed

Currently , i have VI which supports for upto 4 bytes write operation for CANopen SDO.
I need VI which supports for beyond 4 bytes ie. Segmented AND bLOCK trasnfer.
Please provide me.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Nilya,
Did you create a service request about this? The Industrial Communications for Canopen should support segmented SDO
Jesse Dennis
Design Engineer
Erdos Miller

The write operation is too slow, why?

Hi,all
I have two DS, the version is 5.2_patch_6, and I have enabled the MMR. I find one of the two DS is response slow when I do write operations, as follows:
[05/Mar/2009:11:38:57 +0800] conn=38445 op=24167 msgId=707927 - MOD dn="uid=shzadmin,ou=People,o=xxxxx" authzid="dn:uid=amAdm
in,ou=People,o=xxxxx"
[05/Mar/2009:11:39:35 +0800] conn=38445 op=24167 msgId=707927 - RESULT err=0 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=38 csn=49af4f38000000010000
[05/Mar/2009:14:01:59 +0800] conn=38445 op=24393 msgId=710798 - ADD dn="uid=lhttestadmin,ou=People,o=xxxxx" authzid="dn:uid=amAdmin,ou=People,o=xxxxx"
[05/Mar/2009:14:02:37 +0800] conn=38445 op=24393 msgId=710798 - RESULT err=0 tag=105 nentries=0 etime=38 csn=49af70be000000010000
[05/Mar/2009:14:09:24 +0800] conn=38445 op=24471 msgId=711018 - DEL dn="uid=lhttestadmin,ou=People,o=xxxxx" authzid="dn:uid=amAdmin,ou=People,o=xxxxx"
[05/Mar/2009:14:09:36 +0800] conn=38445 op=24471 msgId=711018 - RESULT err=0 tag=107 nentries=0 etime=12 csn=49af727b000000010000
I don't know why. And more, I find the slow DS's error log have warning log as follows:
[26/Feb/2009:18:08:35 +0800] - WARNING<10307> - Replication - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Configuration warning Tombstone purging int
ernal search is unindexed in replica o=xxxxx
Does the warning result the slow? Anybody can help?
Thanks in advance!
Shen
Edited by: shenhongzhou on Mar 5, 2009 12:09 AM

[26/Feb/2009:18:08:35 +0800] - WARNING<10307> - Replication - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Configuration warning Tombstone purging internal search is unindexed in replica o=xxxxx
This is a known problem (bug 6175472) and the fix is already available in 5.2p6. Look for the script called <serverroot>/bin/slapd/admin/bin/ActivateFix6175472. Run it as:
# <server root>/bin/slapd/admin/bin/ActivateFix6175472 <server-root>/slapd-whatever
This will shutdown the instance, modify dse.ldif, define and create a vlv index (for the tombstone entries) and start the instance back up. Beware that if any of your entries have the objectclass definition in mixed case (objectClass etc), the script might not work as expected.
Easiest way to check is:
# cd <server-root>/slapd-whatever/config
# grep -i objectclass dse.ldif | grep -v objectclass
If nothing is returned, then you're all set to run the script. If not, you'll have to contact Sun Support (quoting bug 6692944) for a fix to the script that handles entries in a case insensitive manner.

Requeue Failed cachestore write operation.

I am trying to requeue failed cachestore write operation , for this I add <write-requeue-threshold> property in coherence-config file,but I am not sure about its behaviour
1) what will happen if number of cachestore failed operation are greater than threshold specified, means will the extra objects also be requeued of simply dropped off?
2) is the sequence of write operation maintained, let say
i) DB is down at time T1
ii)Object A is requeued at time T2
iii)DB is up again at time T3 and at the same time another object B is also placed in queue
then will object A be written first or Object B.
Gaurav

user8157603 wrote:
I am trying to requeue failed cachestore write operation , for this I add <write-requeue-threshold> property in coherence-config file,but I am not sure about its behaviour
1) what will happen if number of cachestore failed operation are greater than threshold specified, means will the extra objects also be requeued of simply dropped off?
AFAIK, if the number of entries which failed to be written grows above the write-requeue-threshold, then the surplus entries will just not be queued for retries. Coherence would just not have the information that it should write it out that entry because it is still dirty.
2) is the sequence of write operation maintained, let say
i) DB is down at time T1
ii)Object A is requeued at time T2
iii)DB is up again at time T3 and at the same time another object B is also placed in queue
then will object A be written first or Object B.
If you mean object A and B are put in the cache for the same key, then, one of the following two scenarios can happen:
As there is no such thing as two events happening at the same time when race conditions are guarded against, let's say that the cache processes the placement of Object B into the cache at time T4 which is very close to T3. The question is how does T4 compare to the time when the write-behind thread starts collecting entries to write and pass it to the cache-store (T5) .
If T5 < T3 and T5 < T4 then the database is still down and the write does not succeed, and afterwards Object B will be enqueued for its first write, so the entry is not retried yet. Object A will not be written to the DB at all.
If T3 < T5 < T4 then Object A will be written and Object B will be enqueued for writing in the next batch write.
If T5 > T4 then Object A will not be found by the write-behind thread at all, and Object B will be written out.
Best regards,
Robert

Yours sincerely! I just bought a Sony DCR-SD1000 camera only when installing the cd drivers not supported by the operating system Machintosh. I've contacted the seller said the store did not provide for the apple os. How can I move all the files on the ca

Yours sincerely! I just bought a Sony DCR-SD1000 camera only when installing the cd drivers not supported by the operating system Machintosh. I've contacted the seller said the store did not provide for the apple os. How can I move all the files on the camera the port out is to use a USB data cable to a laptop for my macbookpro can not read the contents of the file and the camera. I also want to use the lens on the camera as a substitute for the embedded camera on my macbookpro, what should I do to replace the embedded camera on macbookpro with sony camera so that the camera could be more variety and can I record when I turned macbookpro . Please help for this so that I can quickly capture the results from sony camera to my macbookpro. Thank you.

See this page http://macosx.com/forums/networking-compatibility/296947-sony-camcorder-my-mac.h tml - might be some helpful tips there.
Clinton

The first binary file write operation for a new file takes progressively longer.

I have an application in which I am acquiring analog data from multiple
PXI-6031E DAQ boards and then writing that data to FireWire hard disks
over an extended time period (14 days). I am using a PXI-8145RT
controller, a PXI-8252 FireWire interface board and compatible FireWire
hard drive enclosures. When I start acquiring data to an empty
hard disk, creating files on the fly as well as the actual file I/O
operations are both very quick. As the number of files on the
hard drive increases, it begins to take considerably longer to complete
the first write to a new binary file. After the first write,
subsequent writes of the same data size to that same file are very
fast. It is only the first write operation to a new file that
takes progressively longer. To clarify, it currently takes 1 to 2
milliseconds to complete the first binary write of a new file when the
hard drive is almost empty. After writing 32, 150 MByte files,
the first binary write to file 33 takes about 5 seconds! This
behavior is repeatable and continues to get worse as the number of
files increases. I am using the FAT32 file system, required for
the Real-Time controller, and 80GB laptop hard drives. The
system works flawlessly until asked to create a new file and write the
first set of binary data to that file. I am forced to buffer lots
of data from the DAQ boards while the system hangs at this point.
The requirements for this data acquisition system do not allow for a
single data file so I can not simply write to one large file.
Any help or suggestions as to why I am seeing this behavior would be
greatly appreciated.

I am experiencing the same problem. Our program periodically monitors data and eventually save it for post-processing. While it's searching for suitable data, it creates one file for every channel (32 in total) and starts streaming data to these files. If it finds data is not suitable, it deletes the files and creates new ones.
On our lab, we tested the program on windows and then on RT and we did not find any problems.
Unfortunately when it was time to install the PXI on field (an electromechanic shovel on a copper mine) and test it, we've come to find that saving was taking to long and the program screwed up. Specifically when creating files (I.E. "New File" function). It could take 5 or more seconds to create a single file.
As you can see, field startup failed and we will have to modify our programs to workaround this problem and return next week to try again, with the additional time and cost involved. Not to talk about the bad image we are giving to our costumer.
I really like labview, but I am particularly upset beacuse of this problem. LV RT is supposed to run as if it was LV win32, with the obvious and expected differences, but a developer can not expect things like this to happen. I remember a few months ago I had another problem: on RT Time/Date function gives a wrong value as your program runs, when using timed loops. Can you expect something like that when evaluating your development platform? Fortunately, we found the problem before giving the system to our costumer and there was a relatively easy workaround. Unfortunately, now we had to hit the wall to find the problem.
On this particular problem I also found that it gets worse when there are more files on the directory. Create a new dir every N hours? I really think that's not a solution. I would not expect this answer from NI.
I would really appreciate someone from NI to give us a technical explanation about why this problem happens and not just "trial and error" "solutions".
By the way, we are using a PXI RT controller with the solid-state drive option.
Thank you.
Daniel R.
Message Edited by Daniel_Chile on 06-29-2006 03:05 PM

Cannot find the Satellite L650-10H in support database

Hi,
I bought Toshiba L650-10H (PSK1JE-00400MSK) two years ago and now i have problem find this model in support database.
This is my laptop: http://notebooky.heureka.sk/toshiba-satellite-l650-10h-psk1je-00400msk/

Hi
This notebook Satellite L650-10G is DISCONTINUED MODEL
You can find the specification sheet here:
[Satellite L650-10G|http://uk.computers.toshiba-europe.com/innovation/jsp/SUPPORTSECTION/discontinuedProductPage.do?service=UK&toshibaShop= true&com.broadvision.session.new=Yes&PRODUCT_ID=10 85933]
If you need drivers, you can download this from driver page

File Adapter Write Operation inserts a new line at the end

Hi,
I am using the write operation in the File Adapter from BPEL Process. The data is written successfully to the file and file is also created in the location specified in the adapter wsdl. But in the file created, it creates a new line at the end of the file. This new line has to be avoided when writing data to a file.
Has anyone faced this and solved this ?
I am SOA 10.1.3.4.
Cheers,
- AR

It is a bug in 10g and will be resolved in one of the versions of 11g.
Cheers,
-AR

Does Form 10g support database 8.1.7..? what version it support? Thanks.

Does Form 10g support database 8.1.7..? what version it support? Thanks.

I've never heard, that forms 10g not runs on 8.1.7.
The list of certified combinations can be found on metalink.oracle.com

Will my 2009 macbook pro support a higher operating system than OS 10.5

Will my 2009 macbook pro support a higher operating system than OS 10.5.8?

For any upgrades, you will need to purchase this Snow Leopard disk from the Apple online store:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573Z/A/mac-os-x-106-snow-leopard
After installing Snow Leopard (10.6.3) you should perform a software update and install 10,6.8. That will permit the installation of either Lion, Mt. Lion or Mavericks, depending upon your needs and/or preferences.
Ciao.

I have an older MAC running OSX 10.4.11. Can I get a free download of Firefox supported by my operating system? (Apple no longer supports my computer and does not have an update available for my operating system)

would like to download Firefox but new version is not supported by my operating system

Firefox 3.6.x is the last available from Mozilla for 10.4.11 PPC Macs. <br />
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

OSB support database write operation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for