OSS Note 386896 (Substitution for call-up point 3) implementation in ECC 6

Hello Everyone,
We had implemented OSS Note 386896 (Substitution for call-up point 3 ('Complete document')) in our SAP system (Release 470).
Now weu2019ve upgraded to ECC 6 and are looking for an alternate solution as OSS 386896 is not valid in ECC 6.
Suggestions on any solution would be highly appreciated.
Warm Regards,
Sushil.

Hi,
Please do the below.
Check the SAP Service market website and search for the OSS note, check the validity for the OSS note, if it is being already applied as a support pack or not,
Check if the release of the OSS note is valid for your ECC 6. If not then Raise a message with SAP and ask if there is any alternative note for this in the new release. SAP will respond to the query or can extend the validity  of the note.
Regards
Shiva

Similar Messages

  • 1.call information such as call waiting,call forwarding, call holding is not working when caller the call me or im wait for my call i cant see any title by iphon , and also holding is the same.2. there is not any option for call baring.

    Hi. please solve my problem.
    .call information such as call waiting,call forwarding, call holding is not working when caller the call me or im wait for my call i cant see any title by iphon , and also holding is the same.2. there is not any option for call baring.3.playback music is not hearing by second partner during the call.4.i cant select ringing ton from saving tons.
    thank you in advance.

    Hi Ersin,
    Exception 1 would seem to be FORMATTING_ERROR, which suggests something in the design of the Smartform.  However, that doesn't fit with the form being generated from a report, but only erroring when called from a function module.  I can think of no reason why the different calling method would be a factor.
    When FORMATTING_ERROR is raise it should also set a message ID and number, are you able to determine what they are?
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Fault policies not getting executed for called BPEL process

    Hi,
    I am facing one issue in execution of fault policy for a called BPEL Process.
    I have two BPEL Processes - BPELProcess1 and BPELProcess2.
    We have fault-policies and fault-bindings file.
    Case1 - BPELProcess2 is synchronous :-
    BPELProcess2 throws a fault of selectionFailure.
    Now this fault is defined in fault-policies and fault policy is bound to BPELProcess2 component in fault-bindings.xml file.
    But this fault policy is NOT getting executed.
    This selectionFailure fault from BPELProcess2 goes unhandled and in BPELProcess1, invoke activity gets this unhandled fault and raises a fault "remoteFault".
    This remotefault is also defined in fault-bindings and bound to BPELProcess1 component. Here fault policy bound to BPELProcess1 is working fine.
    So problem is that for called process, fault policies are not getting executed while for calling process, they are getting executed.
    Case1 - BPELProcess2 is Asynchronous
    BPELProcess2 is asynchronous. So same situation happening here. Fault policy for BPELProcess2 is not getting executed on throwing selectionFailure.
    But now here, since BPELProcess2 is async in nature, BPELProcess1 is not getting response and it is always waiting for response which is wrong.
    So how can we use fault policies in this case?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Parshant

    So that means - only fault originating from invoke activity in BPEL can be associated with a fault policy. No other fault can be associated. Even if I throw a selectionFault from throw activity, that will not be captured. Only fault from invoke activity can be associated with a fault policy.
    Please confirm.
    Thanks,
    Edited by: 833944 on Feb 24, 2011 9:36 PM

  • OSS note 550071 - price for catalog product

    Hello All,
    the sub OSS note says
    If a valid source is assigned to the shopping basket item (for example, an info record or a contract), the price is transferred to the purchase order from the source of supply<b> - unless, the item is created via a catalog and it contains the catalog price.</b>
    we require that the ECC cotract price should be picked up while classic PO creation , even though the product is picked up from catalog (which has contract no in the product characteristics).
    Now only in one test case we observed that system behaved in our desired way and contradictory to the note.
    Does anyone know about any control on this behaviour?
    we could not find any.
    (we have not implemented BBP_APPEND_ITEM)
    BR
    Dinesh

    Hi
    Which SRM version are you using ? What you observed in your test-case ?
    <b>Anyways, You can do this easily using any of the BADIs</b>
    - BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI
    - BBP_SOS_BADI
    P.S. : Read the relevant standard SAP documenatation in SE18 Transaction.
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • OSS note containing fixes for ITS 6.20 patch 19

    What is the OSS note that tells of the fixes for patch 19?
    Thanks,
    Jin Bae

    Hello John,
    Note 491781 is currently being translated from German to English and should be available in English shortly.  If you have a specific note you are looking for then you could also check that note to see if it has been updated with the corrected patch number for ITS.
    Edgar

  • Substitution call up point 3 - add fields

    HI Experts
    I have a requirement that SAP should propose BKPF-XBLNR filed automatically when user clicks on save. I am planning to use substitution call u point 3 to get this requirement done. I have done the configuration but then I came to that for call up point 3 this field is not avilable for substituion. Is there a way to add this field to to the substituion field list . (this field is available for call up point 2)
    Thanks
    Kiran

    Hi, it's not unusual that you donu2019t have all the information in a substitution u2013 at the time of the call-up point!
    By that I mean you could have the information of the screen of the posting u2013 but itu2019s not passed on as information to be used in substitutions u2026
    If that is the case do you have to write a few ABAP lines in order to read the content of the screen and pass in on in to the substitution.
    You can find out by using transaction GGB0 u2013 look here for the debugging instruction 
    regards
    René
    Edited by: René Vestergaard Nielsen on Aug 26, 2008 3:09 PM - wrong link

  • OSS notes for MB1B in checking Amount and Quantity depending on the mat. #

    Dear All:
    Where can i download OSS notes in MB1B for  checking the amount and quantity depending on the material number?
    Thanks,
    CHOCO

    Hi ,
    We are not getting what you mean to say.
    But as far my understanding of your query I am giving the reply.
    OSS notes can be download at the tcode SNOTE.
    Pls go to the tcode SNOTE-> GOTO ->DOWNLOAD SAP NOTE.
    here you need to give the sap note number.
    To get this number you first need to search in service.sap.com and find the relevant note that is useful for ur scenario.
    And after finding that note and we need to give this number in SNOTE tcode and we need to download.
    Pls tell me your requirement clearly so that i will try to find a oss note for you.
    Pls get back to us for further assistance . Happy to help you.
    Regards,
    Viveks

  • OSS note for FM ADDRESS_INTO_PRINTFORM

    Hi All,
    Can anyone please provide me OSS note numbers available for FM ADDRESS_INTO_PRINTFORM.
    I want to see OSS notes applicable for printing Countries in address.
    Regards,
    Imran Kundan.

    Better perform (yourself or basis) the search yourself at http://service.sap.com/notes, as the list depends on your exact version/sp level and list of application/add-ons, use keyword BAS_PRINT. And there are MANY notes, already 2 exist for July 2014. You could also start with collective note  35931 - Collective note: Formatting/printing addresses .
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • OSS note  for FD33 T-CODE in ECC 6.0

    Hi All,
      In FD33 T-CODE we have maintained multiple customers.
    Put in customer number, credit control area  and mark Status - enter - environment - reporting -credit master sheet.
    In the output we are getting Payment history for the last customer . But we require the output of all Payment history of all customers.
    Any OSS NOTE is available for the above issue.
    Any help will appreciated.

    Hi All,
      In FD33 T-CODE we have maintained multiple customers.
    Put in customer number, credit control area  and mark Status - enter - environment - reporting -credit master sheet.
    In the output we are getting Payment history for the last customer . But we require the output of all Payment history of all customers.
    Any OSS NOTE is available for the above issue.
    Any help will appreciated.

  • Hi all,   OSS notes for luxembourg

    hi all,
    By using snote i am unable to implement oss note for luxembourg.  oss note i want to implement is 578514.
    i have changed FM (convert_bank_account_2_iban_lu and convert_iban_2_bank_account_lu) and also done parameter settings for managment of IBAN. after making changes i am still getting gray rhombus,which cannot be implemented.
    In service.sap there is no code correction instructions are available.
    can onebody send me correction code instructions for implementation of oss note (578514)Luxembourg for management of IBAN.
    thanking u in advance.

    Hello,
    what is your release / support package stand? The given note only contains corrections instructions till:
    SAP_ABA   
       SAPKA46B49 - 46B
       SAPKA46C40 - 46C
       SAPKA50A28 - 50
       SAPKA62016 - 620
    Regards,
    Dezso

  • Unable to create the validation at Call up point 3

    Dear Friends,
    I am trying to create the validation rule for call up point 3..
    while doing the prerequisite is system is not througing any error message, But while doing Check step I am getting the message like " Formula composed upto first systax error"
    This is the full length message i am getting the error..
    The formula was composed up to the first syntax error.
    Message no. GB 506
    Diagnosis
    You tried to exit insert mode, which is only possible if the formula has no syntax errors from beginning to end. If it is not, a new insertion session is opened ahead of the first syntax error. You can then correct the syntax error at the new position through making new entries or by deleting the formula symbols that follow.
    You can then try exiting the insertion session again.
    Validation is
    BKPF-TCODE = 'MIRO' and BKPF-BUKRS = '2005'
    check
    BSEG-BVTYP not equal to null
    in this point i am getting the above mentioned message
    Please let me know in this regard.
    Regards,
    Anand

    Dear,
    Callup point 3 will not be allowed in this validation because in CHECK you are just calling the BSEG (line item) so just select callup point 2 will be accurate one and it will be successful....
    Callup point 3 is used when you want system to perform check for both BSEG and BKPF table fields....
    To conclude use callup point 2 in this validation .
    REgards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • BSEG-VBUND Updation using Call up point 3 while posting from VF01

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to update BSEG-UPDATE during the Invoice posting VF01.
    I tried to use Substitution at CALL UP POINT 3. but it is not updating the value.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Leela Krishna

    Hi,
    Create the substitution at call up point 2 (Line Item) as below:-
    Pre-requisit:-
    BSEG-KOART = 'D'
    AND
    BSEG-TCODE = 'VF01'
    Substitution:-
    BSEG-VBUND = your trading partner
    Regards,
    SDNer

  • OSS Note-version

    hi,
    i am downloading OSS Note 852990.it is downloaded successfully.But while implementing it gives error-'SAP Note does not contain valid correction instruction'.
    But while going to error log,this shows the message-'SAP NOte 852990 in version 0004 downloaded'.
    any idea how to correct the error?

    Hi,
    Check what is the Highest support package applied.Since this is Valid to Support Package    500 - SAPKH50008 .
    Go to se37 and check for the code in  FUNCTION module BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CHANGE
      IF NOT GS_VBKOK-LIKP_DEL IS INITIAL.                       "v_n_852990
        PERFORM CSL_REORG TABLES TOKENREFERENCE.
      ENDIF.                                                                           "^_n_852990
      PERFORM ROLLBACK_CHECK.
    If this code is present then the Note is applied.
    Thanks,
    Ahsan
    Edited by: Mohammed Ahasanullah Mulla on Apr 11, 2008 8:25 AM

  • Emails not being recieved, tried removing all passwords, not being asked for one when I re-open thunderbird

    stopped receiving emails 3 days ago to both accounts I have. On line at verizion I see the new emails but Thunderbird is not opening them. Any suggestions? Thanks

    If you deleted all password in Thunderbrd and are not being asked for them that points straight at your anti virus program and it's "password vault" messing up. Try disabling email scanning in your internet security suite.

  • What changes are required for OSS note 456507

    Hi All,
    PLease advise me what changes are required for OSS note 456507 (Assign the function groups QOWK or ORFC in the authorization object S_RFC to tRFC/qRFC users).
    I’m thinking of just going with the following additions to Role
    AAAB – Cross Application Auth Objects
    S_RFC
    Activity – 16
    Name of RFC - *
    Type of RFC - *
    But wanted to check what the implications of doing such a thing were, are there any negative points that you can think of opening up the access as above, as opposed to what was suggested in the OSS note?
    Your advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Sandhya.

    Hello Sandhya,
    S_RFC is needed in case of making any RFC calls.
    Normally it is needed  for users that are mentioned in RFC destinations.
    As such mostly these users are system/communication users or super users.
    Without giving access to function groups through S_RFC successful RFC call can´not be done.
    Now the value of field name of RFC can be * but only for those users which are really global super users. In case you need this authorization for any selective functionality as in you case only for function groups QOWK or ORFC then you should try to  restrict the access. Negatiity is only that in case of * the authorization access increases but for system or super users you dont need to worry too much really because with system/communication users no one can login and the super users will have sap_all generally. Also their passwords will be a well kept secret so that a miususe can not be made.
    By global super users I mean users which are used for various types of activites.
    Please award points accordingly.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Remediation enquiry

    I am currently using Captivate 6 and am having issues with remediation and quiz movements.  Currently I would like to have the following set up: slide 1 slide 2 slide 3 question slide - if correct move on to next slide - if incorrect move to slide 2

  • Java XML Parser:Null Pointer exception in EntityReader

    I got NullPointer Exception when trying to parse a XML file which is pointed by a net URL, (say "http://www..."). The code causing problem is like: parser.parse(new URL("http://www.../demo.xml")); the exception I got is: java.lang.NullPointerExceptio

  • Data Guard Broker and Cold Failover clusters

    Hi, I wanted to use Data Guard Broker to control primary/standby systems on AIX clusters but found that without Oracle clusterware it is not supported on failover of a database to another node (unless you drop and recreate the configuration which in

  • Provide Final Cut Pro Feedback... points to an outdated site. It doesn't even list Final Cut Pro X!!!

    Provide Final Cut Pro Feedback... Points to an outdated site. It doesn't even list Final Cut Pro X!!! How do I suppose to report bugs?

  • TreeControl node selection

    I have ported my application from JDeveloper 3.0 to 3.1. I experienced much better refreshment in the TreeControl when I insert/delete/update a row of a rowset displayed via a form. Thanks. But when I select a node in the TreeControl the correspondin