Outline Agreement (Contract) data does not match with EKPO table.

Hi,
I have created a outline agreement(Contract) with net price as 100 / 1 Kg. But when I go to EKPO table in front of Net Price it is reflecting net price as 1 / 1 Kg. So it shows that it is dividing the net price by 100 in Table EKPO. This is happening with the currencies which are maintained in T Code OY04 (Currencies like JPY, CLP, ESP, ITL) with decimals as 0.
Rest all curriencies which have not maintained in OY04, there is no problem in EKPO as the data matches with Outline Agreement Net Price.
Request you to please provide the input to resolve the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Neeraj Singh

Hi Neeraj Singh,
The value of data stored in EKPO depends on the decimal places defined
for the currency. In standard the decimal places is taken as 2 . Therefore the value will be
the same as order price if the currency is defined for two decimal
places ( default is 2 ).
However, if the decimal places for JPY is defined as zero the table
will show a value of price /100. If you choose a currency with
3 decimal places the value in the table will be price * 10 and so on.
Example:
Currency                          Decimal places      Order price      Value in EKPO
SGD                                               2               2000               2000
NLG                                               2               2000               2000
JPY                                               0               2000               20
KWD (Kuwati Dinar)                     3               2000               20000
ITL                                                 0               2000               20
All currencies that do not have any decimal places at all
(TCURX-CURRDEC = 0) must have EKPO-NETPR multiplied by 100.
Please check SAP notes which may be of help to understand this issue 53206 and 137626
The issue you reported in not an error but standard. I hope this information is of help.
Regards,
Lorraine
Edited by: Lorraine Donnelly on Jul 12, 2010 6:57 PM

Similar Messages

GR/IR account G/L balance does not match with BSIS table

Hi,
I am preparing a report which uses table BSIS.But the total in the table does not match with the GR/IR G/L balance account.When I click on balance item display in FS10N the entries match with that of BSIS but the total is different.Also how to factor the year opening balance entries in the report.
Thanks
Arun

But that will slow down the system considerabley, because BSEG contains a huge data

Query data does not match with Multiprovider

hello,
I am as confused as my subject.
I executed the query from Multiprovider, which getting the data from sales and inventory cube.
Everything works fine until I try to validate some of the data.
I can validate some early records but I cannot see later ones in any of the cubes or multiprovider.
I deleted the data and loaded all over again but didnt work.
I am trying to display the record from Plant, material and calday ... i do see the date and plant # but not material #.
I hope I am making sense to you guys.
Any input would be appreciated.
Khalid

Hello Kalyan,
Material is part of both cubes (inventory and sales) and I did flag it in multiprovider when selecting "display data" > dimensions.
I am not sure if it makes difference ... there is another cube (store planning) attached to same multiprovider ... which not feed data but as you know does not report on material level.
Do you think it could create the problem. Again (store planning) cube is not feeding data to multiprovider at the moment.
Thank You ... any other suggestion.
Khalid

Job Cancelled with an error "Data does not match the job def: Job terminat"

Dear Friends,
The following job is with respect to an inbound interface that transfers data into SAP.
The file mist.txt is picked from the /FI/in directory of the application server and is moved to the /FI/work directory of application server for processing. Once the program ends up without any error, the file is moved to /FI/archive directory.
The below are the steps listed in job log, no spool is generated for this job and it ended up with an error "Data does not match the job definition; job terminated".Please see below for more info.
1.Job   Started
2.Step 001 started (program Y_SAP_FI_POST, variant MIST, user ID K364646)
3.File mist.txt copied from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/ to /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
4.File mist.txt deleted from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/.
5.File mist.txt read from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
6.PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: This job was started periodically or directly from SM36/SM37 (Message Class: BD, Message Number : 076)
7.Job PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: Data does not match the job definition; job terminated (Message Class : BD, Message No. 078)
8.Job cancelled after system exception
ERROR_MESSAGE
Could you please analyse and come up about under what circumstance the above error is reported.
As well I heard that because of the customization issues in T.Code BMV0, the above error has raised.
Also please note that we can define as well schedule jobs from the above transaction and the corresponding data is stored in the table TBICU
My Trials
1. Tested uplaoding an empty file
2. Tested uploading with wrong data
3. Tested uploading with improper data that has false file structue
But failed to simulate the above scenario.
Clarification Required
Assume that I have defined a job using BMV0. Is that mandatory to use the same job in SM37/SM36 for scheduling?
Is the above question valid?
Edited by: dharmendra gali on Jan 28, 2008 6:06 AM

Dear Friends,
_Urgent : Please work on this ASAP _
The following job is with respect to an inbound interface that transfers data into SAP.
The file mist.txt is picked from the /FI/in directory of the application server and is moved to the /FI/work directory of application server for processing. Once the program ends up without any error, the file is moved to /FI/archive directory.
The below are the steps listed in job log, no spool is generated for this job and it ended up with an error "Data does not match the job definition; job terminated".Please see below for more info.
1.Job Started
2.Step 001 started (program Y_SAP_FI_POST, variant MIST, user ID K364646)
3.File mist.txt copied from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/ to /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
4.File mist.txt deleted from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/.
5.File mist.txt read from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
6.PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: This job was started periodically or directly from SM36/SM37 (Message Class: BD, Message Number : 076)
7.Job PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: Data does not match the job definition; job terminated (Message Class : BD, Message No. 078)
8.Job cancelled after system exception
ERROR_MESSAGE
Could you please analyse and come up about under what circumstance the above error is reported.
As well I heard that because of the customization issues in T.Code BMV0, the above error has raised.
Also please note that we can define as well schedule jobs from the above transaction and the corresponding data is stored in the table TBICU
My Trials
1. Tested uplaoding an empty file
2. Tested uploading with wrong data
3. Tested uploading with improper data that has false file structue
But failed to simulate the above scenario.
Clarification Required
Assume that I have defined a job using BMV0. Is that mandatory to use the same job in SM37/SM36 for scheduling?
Is the above question valid?

Background Job cancelling with error Data does not match the job definition

Dear Team,
Background Job is getting cancelled when I run a Job on periodically but the same Job is executing perfectly when I run it manually(repeat scheduling) .
Let me describe the problem clearly.
We have a program which picks up files from an FTP server and posts the documents into SAP. We are scheduling this program as a background Job daily. This Job is running perfectly if the files contain no data. But if the file contains data the JOb is getting cancelled with the following messages.
And also the same Job is getting executed perfectly when repeat scheduling is done ( even for files with data).
Time     Message text                                                                       Message class Message no. Message type
03:46:08 Job PREPAID_OCT_APPS2_11: Data does not match the job definition; job terminated        BD           078          E
03:46:08 Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE                                      00           564          A
Please help me in resolving this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Sai.

hi,
If you have any GUI function modules used in the program of job
you cannot run it in background mode.

The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

Hi ,
We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
"The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
Please let us know reason behind this error message.
Thanks,
Mruduala

You are kidding? It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
Habe you read the error message?
Quote:
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
Check the trigger and it should work again.
Timo

Getting error when view - Requested data type does not match with existing

I have the siebel web service
In the BI publisher as mentioned in the 'Siebel_BI_Publisher_Integration_Concepts.pdf', I have imported the siebel web service
BI can recognize the 'Web service' and methods.
I have created the paramters. The data type is 'String'
When I try to view the report using the BI publisher, I am getting teh following error in th UI
"Requested data type does not match with existing data type"
This is the first time I am using BI publisher to call the Siebel web service. I don't know what this error means
I don't know whether any log file generated wit the details of this erro message
Any help is much appriciated
Thanks,
Kavitha

Hi all,
have you find a fix for this issue? Im facing the same situation, using Complex type, and String data type both in the service and Bi publisher. We are consuming CC&B services, and we have noticed this error appears when BIPublisher is running on WebLogic (10.3) but it does not appear when BIPublisher is running on OC4J , of course running the same report on both application servers.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot, regards
Nestor

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

Stock transport order requiremnet date does not match in tranRRP3) &MD04

STO delivery date does not match in transaction MD04 (ECC 6.0) and RRP3 (SCM5.1). This situation occurs when delivery date in STO is past due. During Shipment Scheduling & avaibilty check, materail staging/availability date(EKET-MBDAT) get updated with current date. This EKET -MBDAT date is reflecting in the stock requirement list as a requirement date which is correct. Still APO product view screen dispalys the past due date as a requiremnet date instead of date in MBDAT.
Please let me know in case of any more clarification on this.

Dear Sanjay,
STO Delivery Date is receipt date at destination location. This minus Transportation Lead time is STO requirement date at source.
When you conduct ATP check for this PO/STO, your committed date is updated at source and delivery date will be updated as committed date plus TL lead time.
Do check your GR/GI times in Product Master as primary date mismatch issue.
If you are using any Customized program for updating EKET-MBDAT, it wont automatically trigger the change date in APO.
In such cases you need to run CCR in APO and reconcile.
The better way is to periodically schedule IM initialization (RIMODINI). This maps all R3/ECC data in your IM for PO/STOs and you would see the consistency in APO and ECC.
Regards,
Bipin

Regarding "Data does not match the job definition; job terminated"

Dear Friends,
The following job is with respect to an inbound interface that transfers data into SAP.
The file mist.txt is picked from the /FI/in directory of the application server and is moved to the /FI/work directory of application server for processing. Once the program ends up without any error, the file is moved to /FI/archive directory.
The below are the steps listed in job log, no spool is generated for this job and it ended up with an error "Data does not match the job definition; job terminated".Please see below for more info.
1.Job Started
2.Step 001 started (program Y_SAP_FI_POST, variant MIST, user ID K364646)
3.File mist.txt copied from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/ to /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
4.File mist.txt deleted from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/in/.
5.File mist.txt read from /data/sap/ARD/interface/FI/work/.
6.PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: This job was started periodically or directly from SM36/SM37 (Message Class: BD, Message Number : 076)
7.Job PD-DKLY-Y_SAP_FI_POST: Data does not match the job definition; job terminated (Message Class : BD, Message No. 078)
8.Job cancelled after system exception
ERROR_MESSAGE
Could you please analyse and come up about under what circumstance the above error is reported.
As well I heard that because of the customization issues in T.Code BMV0, the above error has raised.
Also please note that we can define as well schedule jobs from the above transaction and the corresponding data is stored in the table TBICU
My Trials
1. Tested uplaoding an empty file
2. Tested uploading with wrong data
3. Tested uploading with improper data that has false file structue
But failed to simulate the above scenario.
Clarification Required
Assume that I have defined a job using BMV0. Is that mandatory to use the same job in SM37/SM36 for scheduling?
Is the above question valid?

Hi dharmendra
Good Day
How are you
I am facing the same problem which you have posted
By any chance have you got the soultion for this
If so please let me know the solution for this.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers
Vallabhaneni

Recovery scenario - Voting disk does not match with the cluster guid

Hi all,
Think of you can not start your guest VMs just because it has a corrupted system.img root image. And assume it contains 5 physical disk( which are all created by the RAC template) hence ASM on them.
What is the simplest recovery scneario of the guest vms (RAC)?
Can it be a feasible scenario for recover of the availablity? (Assume both of the RAC system images are corrupted and we prefer not a system level recovery rather than backup / restore)
1. Create 2 RAC instances using the same networking and hostname details as the ones that are corrupted. - Use 5 different new disks.
2 Shutdown the newly created instances. Drop the disks from the newly created instances using VM manager.
3. Add the old disks whose system image is failing to be recoverd but ASM disks are still in use (from the newly created instances using VM manager.) to the newly created instances.
4. Open the newly created instances
Can we expect the ASM and CRS could be initialized and be opened without a problem?
When I try this scenario I get the folllowing error from the cssd/crsd .
- Cluster guid 9112ddc0824fefd5ff2b7f9f7be8f048 found in voting disk does not match with the cluster guid a3eec66a2854ff0bffe784260856f92a obtained from the GPnP profile.
- Found 0 configured voting files but 1 voting files are required, terminating to ensure data integrity.
What could be the simplest way of recovery of a virtual machine that has healthy ASM disks but corrupted system image?
Thank you

Hi,
you have a similar problem, when trying to clone databases with 11.2.
The problem is that a cluster is uniquely identified, and this information is hold in the OCR and the Voting disks. So exactly these 2 are not to be cloned.
To achieve what you want, simply setup your system in that way, that you have a separate diskgroup for OCR and Voting (and ASM spfile), which is not to be restored in this case of szeanrio.
Only all database files in ASM will then be exchanged later.
Then what you want can be achieved.
However I am not sure that the RAC templates have the option to install OCR and Voting into a separated diskgroup.
Regards
Sebastian

Free space of mdf and ldf does not match with database free space

In SSMS i saw file size related properties and found below details for one database.Here values does not match with other properties. Here size of the mdf, ldf and total size matches with other values under each window. But Available free space of mdf and ldf
if added then it does not equal to Available free space shown in shrink database window and free space shown in database properties. This is true for any database. Why is it so? Please can anyone explain the logic behind this?
Under database properties:
Size: 91.31 MB
Space available:13.40 MB
Under database file properites:
mdf size:17 MB
ldf size:75 MB
under shrink database:
currently allocated size:91.31 MB
Available free space:13.40 MB
under shrink file-for data file:
currently allocated size:16.38 MB
Available free space:12.63 MB
under shrink file-for log file:
currently allocated size:74.94 MB
Available free space:55.62 MB

Hi,
Database properties and database shrink show the total (log+data) values. Others show the individual sizes, log and data separately.
I hope it helps.
Janos
There are 10 type of people. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
My Blog |
Hire Me
This does not answer my question. If you add allocated space of mdf and ldf it equals to database allocated size.But i am asking why this ldf and mdf free space together(when added 55.62+12.63 ) does not equal to database free space?

I'm trying to make a purchase and I get a message that the information does not match with the bank. What can I do?

I'm trying to make a purchase and I get a message that the information does not match with the bank. What can I do?

Go to the APP store or Itunes. On the bottom of the mainpage, tap your apple id, view account. Then you can edit the payment information. Or you can do it(if you encounter a problem there) on Itunes on computer. Just go to the store, select your name and edit information. Make sure everything matches...exp date, name as appears on card etc..

ORA-23327: imported deferred rpc data does not match GLOBAL NAME of ..

Hi,
We took an export of a production database in Oracle 9i (9.2.0.7) and created a new database on a test server with Oracle 10g (10.1.0.5)
The original production database was called DC20 and our new test database is called SD20.
Looking at the logs after the import we're seeing this error:
"ORA-23327: imported deferred rpc data does not match GLOBAL NAME of importing db"
We've looked into it a little and it seems to make sense because the names of the databases are different, and from what we've read, we really didn't need to do a full import including SYSTEM anyway. We also came across a solution telling us:
"If you are not using Replication on the target database, these errors can be ignored. However, you should subsequently remove all the replication objects by running:
$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/catrepr.sql, then catproc.sql"
What I was wondering was if someone could validate that running these scripts and ignoring the errors will be ok, or if they'll cause us issues further down the line.
In case its needed, heres my Export parameter file
"FULL=Y
DIRECT=Y
LOG=E:\Exports\DC20\Log\expDC20.LOG
FILE=E:\Exports\DC20\Data\DC20.DMP"
and heres my Import parameter file
"FULL=Y
COMMIT=Y
GRANTS=N
IGNORE=Y
BUFFER=500000
FILE=E:\Imports\SD20\data\SD20.dmp
LOG=E:\imports\SD20\log\impSD20.LOG"
Thanks for your help!

Thanks Neil, we did already see this note and added it to our list of possible solutions. After we found this one, we also found the one I quoted, which would seem to be the path of least resistance (it would save a good 10 hours in import time if nothing else).
However, if we can't do what I'm asking about in my original post however, the note you mentioned will be our next route..

The report MC+E does not match with F.01

Dear Friends,
The report MC+E does not match with F.01 and moreover it does not indicate the domestic sales.It only captures export sales.
Will you please tell me why it is happenning?
Thank you.
Sadanand.

Mohammed, are you able to create a brand new report using this same database source.
If that works then you know you have the proper drivers for the ODBC connection. Another
way to test this is to use Excel, create a database connection in Excel, to the ODBC table,
and see if you can pull data. You may need to update your ODBC drivers. If you are able
to pull data in your new report, try adding the other database to it, and see if the error returns.
I am on CR XI, so, I can't be much more help.

Outline Agreement (Contract) data does not match with EKPO table.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for