Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO
Hello Experts
I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ankit
Hello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1. Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
(ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2. Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3. Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4. Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5. Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6. Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7. Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8. Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit
Similar Messages
-
Exchange rate type P not getting picked up while executing KSUB-Plan Assess
Hi,
We have Exchange rate type "P" maintained in SPRO in Maintain versions for the Fiscal Year 2010, but even then when I execute KSUB, it posts with Exchange rate type M.
Has anyone faced this issue? We want it to pick up P and not M.
Regards,
SAPFICOHi, set it here IMG-Controlling-Cost Center Accounting-Planning-Basic Settings for Planning-Define versions-Maintain Settings of Version in Controlling Area then Setting for each f. year , double click on current f.year
-
WT not getting picked up under 3PR
Hi All
We are facing an issue wherein the wage type is not getting picked up in 3PR even though it is coming under remuneration statement.
Can you please advise what could be the reason ?
Regards
NehaAs far i understand system will always considers the retro values when ever any changes are there pertaining to wage type accordingly system will do the posting.
Either it is a positive arrear or negative arrear system will bring it to the current period you do not want retro calculation delimit the record maintain 78 with effective date on wards.
Regards
Venkatesh -
Output message type not triggered for few POs
---PRs got created manually. then PRs converted into POs through background job (me59n).
( 25 PRs got created manually with same vendor and pur.org combination then all PRs converted into POs through ME59N. In that 20 PRs had message type automatically but remaining POs haven't got the message type )
Condition record exists with vendor/pur.org combination.
and all IMG settings are correct.
medium is 8 (special function).
and not able to replicate the issue in quality systems.
Please Advise.
Thanks in advance.PRs will not get any message type, POs will get a message record.
How is the situation now?
Did you get 20 POs only, or do you have 25 POs where just 20 have a message record?
In the first case convert the PR manually to a PO manually and see if you get a message record. You should not enter anything manually, it is supposed to work without entering anything manually because it was meant for auto PO. In case you have to enter anything manually, then this might be an indicator why auto PO could not work.
if the latter case, then compare a PO with and without message record on the fields that should match with your condition record.
Do you expect the same message type for all POs, are they all in the same purchasing organisation?
Read and check what is mentioned in KBA 1829682 - Output type is not determined in Purchase order -
Condition type is not get in the PO output
Hi,
I have defined a new condition type ZRA0- Discount as discount charges .
The condition type is not getting print out in PO copy.
The vendor wants to see in the PO copy.
Pls suggest how to configure
Regards
SpHi,
If i understood your problem, you would like to print the discount in PO print copy along with price.ok.
then check with your Abaper,he can fetch the Discount value for that perticular condition type(ZRA0) & print in the PO copy.Its depends on the print programme to get the data from the document to the print out.
Regds -
Output message type determination through MIGO
hello experts,
I am doing MIGO for goods reciept, it is creating material document and triggering output type attached to it (ZLCO).
Same thing when i am doing through an excel sheet (this excel application is calling a Z function module thats one looks is calling Standard BAPI BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE), this is creating material document but not trigger output type.
Output ZLCO is not created upon VGR thru Excel Upload.
What part of code should i provide to my Z function module so that it also trigger the Output type.
Thanks,
SumitPRs will not get any message type, POs will get a message record.
How is the situation now?
Did you get 20 POs only, or do you have 25 POs where just 20 have a message record?
In the first case convert the PR manually to a PO manually and see if you get a message record. You should not enter anything manually, it is supposed to work without entering anything manually because it was meant for auto PO. In case you have to enter anything manually, then this might be an indicator why auto PO could not work.
if the latter case, then compare a PO with and without message record on the fields that should match with your condition record.
Do you expect the same message type for all POs, are they all in the same purchasing organisation?
Read and check what is mentioned in KBA 1829682 - Output type is not determined in Purchase order -
Message log is not getting deleted in WEBUI (BADI ORDER_SAVE)
Hi,
I am displaying an error message based on certain conditions in BADI: ORDER_SAVE (CHECK_BEFORE_SAVE). On getting error, I am correcting that error.
Using CRM_MESSAGE_DELETE, I am deleting error message before displaying new error message. However, my error log is not going away. It is still displaying in the log in WEBUI.
Could you please help me out, how can I delete error message, and error log from WEBUI.
Thanks,
SandeepI have the same question as you .
I have use folleing code to display message in web ui:
if (conditions).
CV_OWN_MESSAGE = 'X'.
MESSAGE '商机描述已经存在，请修改后再保存！' type 'E' RAISING DO_NOT_SAVE .
endif.
but when i have edit the description , the Message log is not getting deleted in WEBUI .
who can tell me , thanks for all your help ! -
Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO
Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
SatishS0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you -
Index is not getting picked even after providing hint
Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
t.site_id as SITE_ID,
tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME ,
t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
mv_sku s
where t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and t.client_id=s.client_id
and ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and t.code= 'Adjustment'
and (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME TYPE VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME TYPE VALUE
cursor_sharing string EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 984 | 29686 (1)| 00:05:57 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26870 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26866 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24327 (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2539 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 26568 | 315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 24 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 25 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19258 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 28 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 6142 | 2816 (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 32 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 335K| 10M| 2535 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | MV_SKU | 37839 | 1699K| 280 (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 56 | 29736 | 340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 848 | 26900 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 5 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 26898 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 25 | 7600 | 26894 (1)| 00:05:23 |
| 8 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 9 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 10 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 1 | 67 | 24352 (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690 | 79681 | | 518 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 13 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION | 24 | 2328 | 2542 (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CODE_646 | 9269 | | 46 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 17 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54 | 22896 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 326 | 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIMEZONE | 4 | 88 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | VIEW | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 576 | 171K| 313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 | UNION-ALL | | | | | |
| 26 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 27 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 1 | 72 | 19269 (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 36016 | | 287 (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 30 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH | 575 | 55200 | 293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1 | 367K| | 3466 (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 | VIEW | MV_SKU | 37 | 3626 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 | UNION-ALL PARTITION | | | | | |
| 34 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU | 1 | 46 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_SKU | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GVriedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 50000 | 47M| 1574 (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 1004 | 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1004 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 50000 | 47M| 7244 (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | T_IX | 50000 | | 98 (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected. -
GL Account is not getting picked by billing document
Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
AshiHello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$ -
File not getting picked with Sender Adapter
Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
RajeevHello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev -
Items not getting picked up in Return sales order
Dear all,
I am creating a return sales order with reference to a sales order.
In my delivery doc the items can be categorised into 3 types:
1- Picking done; Movement type determined
2- Picking done; Movement type not determined
3- Picking not-done; Movement type determined
In the return order, only the items of 1st type are coming. Why others not getting picked up? Can they be entered manually?
regards
SapshedDear Hrishikesh,
Thats Ok. Picking is done only for those items for which Relevant for Picking is ticked.
What I want to know is that, for items that have either their picking not done or Goods movement not determined, they are not getting automatically picked up while I create a Return order w/r to a sales order.
thanks
Sapshed -
Files not getting picked from the FTP site
Dear All,
We are having one File-XI-RFC scenario running in XI-PRD Server. Sometimes what happens is that files available in the FTP site are not getting picked by the File adapter. I have checked in the adapter monitoring and communication channel is active there. Also, there are no errors regarding this in SXMB_MONI. I have configured alerts also but for this case no alerts are getting trigerred. And also when I am reactivating that particular communication channel then that file is getting picked instantaneously.
Can anybody please guide me on what might be the real cause for this as this error is happening randomly.
regards,
N.Jain.HI,
Have you used per File transfer parameter in FTP Communication channel.
It makes the FTP adapter inactive in ideal time.
So add the poll interval may be for every 30 mins or something like it. It will forcefully activate the FTP port after every 30 mins. You may have the poll interval for every 1 min. Only the files to be picked up are getting logged in in XI monitoring.
So there will be no garbage collection of unwanted messages in Monitoring.
Thanks
Swarup -
EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination
HI .. all,
We have transferred Sales order from ECC to GTS. But during prreferrence determination, EXW price of the Sales order is not getting picked up.
Please suggest if any configuration is missing .
Thnks in Advance .Hi Sapcongts,
Of course you should not modify standard SAP code, and I will not help you to do that.
I don't agree with your idea of proposed and actual EXW values. The Sales Order is your way of recording the customer's Purchase Order, and the price should be fixed at that point. The billing process should not change the agreed price of the goods - only perhaps re-calculate taxes and any other charges that could not be confirmed at the time of order.
If your standard prices are offered as FOB, then I can understand your needing to subtract some components to reach the EXW price, but in that case you will have problems transferring the correct amount to GTS. As I mentioned earlier, you can manipulate the data in the BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0A_R3, but I had not looked closely enough at this specific requirement. Unfortunately the pricing table KONV is not provided in the BAdI and that data will not yet be available in the database. Provided the elements to be subtracted are to be read from Master Data, then you could make that same subtraction again in the BAdI. But if there are complex dependencies, it might not be easy.
Having looked in more detail at the code, I think you would be reasonably entitled to complain to SAP about missing functionality here. In the ERP system, the SD pricing provides a specific sub-total (KOMP-PREVA: subtotal 8) for Preference Value, and you can easily configure that to be filled after your subtractions. But that subtotal is not used in the GTS mapping, and I think that's a mistake. You might want to create an OSS message about it, requesting that the GTS Preference value be taken from the sub-total that was clearly designed exactly for that purpose.
In any case, good luck with the project.
Regards,
Dave -
CST is not getting picked up in sales order
Dear Experts,
We are following TAXINN procedure and we have maintained condition record for excise condition type - JEXP, JECS & JA1X and tax condition types - JIVC and JIVP. But in sales order, Excise condition types and Vat is getting picked automatically for local customer. But if I chose a CST customer CST is not getting picked automatically even though I have maintained condition record for the same. I have told my client to use alternative tax classification but my client doesnt want to follow this procedure.
Kindly let me know, how can I make the CST to be picked automatically in sales order.
Thanks & Regards,
Reji SDear Reji,
These may be the possible areas for the issue.
1.Check the ship to party Tax classification in the customer master>Sales area data>billing tab.
2.Check the Tax classification of the material master-->Sales org data view.
3.Check the region of the ship to party.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I upload a Pages document (resume) to a website?
How do I upload a Pages document, my resume, when it only gives the option to choose a file, no copy and paste option? And when I click choose file, pictures are the only thing that come up. Thank you for your help!
-
How to clear costum container editor
CREATE OBJECT: container EXPORTING container_name = 'EDIT', editor EXPORTING parent = container, handle. CALL METHOD editor->set_text_as_stream EXPORTING text = GT_LINE. When iam calling method with exporting GT
-
Nano 6th gen. will not keep accurate time.
Every time I turn it on the time is wrong and the second hand is stuck.
-
The "soft proof" check box is not available in the preview mode. Why is this? How do I get access to it?
-
Sent email and it's not in my sent folder
I wrote an email, clicked send and it sent, but it is not in my sent folder. My settings are to save in sent folder. Any ideas why