Overall Evaluation is Zero

Hi all,
After the Vendor Re-evaluation, the Overall Evaluation of a Vendor is Showing zero.
For Example....Suppose three Main Criterion Price ,Quality, Delivery and Subcriterion for these Main Criterion are maintained. After Evaluation,the Scores for Quality and Delivery is showing but for the criterion Price does not have any Scores and Total Overall evaluation score showing Zero. How the Overall Evaluation becomes Zero even the score is there for Delivery and Quality.
Kindly Help.
regards
Gibi Philip

Hi,
goto the following link , u can find relevant information.
www.help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
goto www.help.sap.com , select MM configuration guide, u can get vendor evaluation cofiguration settings.
bye

Similar Messages

GL Clearing

Hello,
We are in process of finalization of our books of accounts.
We have different profit center in our company and we are doing inter profit clearing.
Now for some gl overall balance is Zero. But If we see Profit center wise then there it shows balance.
e.g
My issue is i want to clear above entry so that even Profit center wise Balance should be zero.
I have tried as under
Created entry with F-02 like,
PC 1001 57859.30000 DR AND   PC 1009 CR
PC 1002 83856.00000 CR AND   PC 1009 DR
PC 1006 25996.70000 DR AND   PC 1009 DR
after above entry it created document with Open item
Now when i clear this entry, system created original entry.
So how to clear above pasted entry profit center wise.
FYI, earlier My GL was not maintain as 'Open Item management". After some time we have made it as "open item management"
Regards

Hello,
OK make your repostings
Then make GL reconcilitation.
br erwin

We have to restrict the visibility of Questions based upon technical and co

We have to restrict the visibility of Questions based upon technical and commercial. For example if there are two section commercial and technical, technical team should not be able to see commercial questions and vice-versa

Hi
I could suggest an alternative approach. You take a call whether it suits your business process
Create a project for the event. Within project you can create two seperate Rfx one with technical team as collaborator and the other with Commercial team. Two Rfx would be evaluated and awarded seperately by respective team. You can take help of your technical expert to create custom report for overall evaluation
Regards
Mudit Saini

Use for Original iPhone

I bought an iPhone 4 and now have an original iPhone gathering dust.
A friend is thinking of getting an iPod Touch and using Skype or some other VOIP system and giving up her cell phone. She has a fear of cellular radiation and she's looking to cut her phone bill.
I offered her my original iPhone to give it a try. Personally I don't think skype alone on an iPod Touch will satisfy her phone needs, and trying it out on my old iPhone would prove/disprove my theory.
What if anything do I need to do to make the old iPhone useable for her? Do I pull the chip out or leave it in?
What's the latest iOS the original iPhone can use?

Group 2B, in which the WHO categorizes EMF as "possibly carcinogenic", also includes things such as orange oil, pickled vegetables, talc-based body powder, titanium dioxide (recommended by many medical organiations as a safer sun block), nickel (the metal), and coffee. Rather a "catch-all" of possibilities, and while not to be dismissed, not exactly a damming statement. If you read the full monograph, it says:
"The evidence was reviewed critically, and overall evaluated as being limited among users of wireless telephones for glioma and acoustic neuroma, and inadequate to draw conclusions for other types of cancers. "
The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk."
This WHO statement is therefore only a statement of concern and a call for additional study, not a definite statement that cellphone use causes cancer.
It's certainly her choice what risks she wishes to avoid. We all make such choices regularly, about all sorts of risks. But an iPod touch is not likely to be much less of a risk, if any, that a cellphone,
Regards.

Strange event.x in onMouseDragged

Hi,
Can somebody please expain following behaviour of the drag listener:
* Main.fx
* Created on 05.01.2009, 14:04:14
package javafxapplication4;
import java.lang.System;
import javafx.ext.swing.SwingComponent;
import javafx.scene.input.MouseEvent;
import javafx.scene.layout.HBox;
import javafx.scene.paint.Color;
import javafx.scene.Scene;
import javafx.scene.shape.Line;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import javax.swing.JTable;
import javax.swing.table.DefaultTableModel;
import javafx.scene.shape.Rectangle;
Stage {
    title: "Application title"
    var modelA:DefaultTableModel = new DefaultTableModel()on replace oldValue {
        modelA.addColumn("aaa");
        modelA.addRow(["aaa1"]);
        modelA.addRow(["aaa2"]);
        modelA.addRow(["aaa3"]);
    var leftTable = SwingComponent.wrap(new JTable(modelA));
    var scene:Scene
    scene: scene = Scene {
            content: HBox {
                content: [
                leftTable,
                Line {
                        startX: 0,
                        startY: 0
                        endX: 0,
                        endY: leftTable.height
                        strokeWidth: 10
                        stroke: Color.BLACK;
                        onMouseDragged: function( e: MouseEvent ):Void {
                            System.out.println("e.x: {e.x}");
}when staring dragging from the rightmost area of the line to the left into the table it gives following output:
e.x: 2.0
e.x: 2.0
e.x: 1.0
e.x: 0.0
e.x: 0.0
e.x: -1.0
e.x: 2.147483568E9
e.x: -2.0
e.x: 2.147483568E9
e.x: -3.0
e.x: 2.147483568E9
e.x: -4.0
e.x: 2.147483568E9
e.x: -5.0
e.x: 2.147483568E9So, the question is where that e.x: 2.147483568E9 comes from? And how a coordinate (number of pixels?) can be floating?
Thanx!

The value 2.147483568E9 means 2.14... times 10 to 9th. Basically there's something evaluating to zero or being divided by zero to give you this value. It must be a bug in the event handling code. Could you file a bug report on it at javafx-jira.kenai.com?
thanks,
Josh

Absence quota zero after Time Evaluation

Dear friends,
We are generating Absence quota automatically after Time evaluation. But CL/PL/SL leave quota generated is zero after TE.
Even I am not able to edit Absence quota(IT2006) manually or through IT2013.
Please guide me, what needs to be done.
Regards,
Nayak

Hi Dracula,
Thanks for your response. No am not able to simulate the situation, it happen just once in PRD server.
I do agree that some one might have chaned the value. But if the quota is generated by time evaluation then you cannot changed the record directly in infotype (2006). Time evaluation generated quota can be changed on through infotype 2013.
I do request all the expert please share your thoughts. Please do let me know what could be the problem here.
Regards
Sandeep

Why main criteria getting zero after auto.new evaluation in ven.evaluation?

Dear experts,
while maintaining vendor evaluation in me61,after selecting auto.new evaluation the weighting of price and quality got zero.Only the delivery is getting calculated.It differs from each vendor(i.e not constant to all). why all the three main criterias are not getting calculated? Pls tel me why it is?.
Thanks in advance.

as far as I know, the Scanner uses the DecimalFormat defined for your Location - so try to insert the decimal in the localized form.
I tested your Applicaion using the german format with a ',': 10,78 on my machine (a German Windows XP) and it worked.
To avoid the endless loop, you need to clear the Scanner in the catch clause:
catch (InputMismatchException e)
System.out.println("Please enter a number!");
// get rid of old stuff
if(console.hasNext()) console.next();
...else the Scanner tries to convert its entry into a Decimal over and over again -> your endless loop.
Lars.

Vendor Evaluation:Reason for ZERO SCORE CALCULATION for SOME CRITERIA

In performing Vendor evaluation few vendors get ZERO as the SCORE for some of the criteria.
At our location,
        1. WEIGHING KEYS
                    EP - Equal weighting
                    UP - Unequal weighting
        2. EVALUATION CRITERIA
                   11 - Price
                   22 - Quality
                   33 - Delivery
                   44 - Service
I would like to know the internal procedure of data collection of any vendor for calculating the SCORE for any CRITERIA.
Thus would be able to understand the reason for ZERO SCORE calculation in any CRITERIA for any vendor.
Edited by: Joy Ghosh on Feb 20, 2009 10:04 AM

Hi,
In vendor evaluation system gives zero score if no transaction has been run with respect to this vendor in the spcified criterias.
1. If no purchase Order is generated with respect to this vendor for a material system will give zero score for price criteria and delivery criteria.
2. If QM module is not active in the system it will show the quality score as zero.
3. If services are not maintained for the vendor then it will give zero price for services.
regrds,
Bharat.

General Evaluation report T-code;ME80FN showing Net order value Zero only

Hi Gurus ,
I am Executing the T-code ;ME80FN in that report i am getting the Net order value as Zero for all report entities Kindly advise for this soon .
Many Thanks
Kiran

Hi,
If PO price ZERO in ME80FN report, then cross check PO item status( is item set for deletion flag or item available with price) in t.code:ME23N and if price very much available in ME23N, then check your user ID authorized for ME80FN report
Also you can cross check PO price in ME2N report or ME80RN report.
Regards,
Biju K

AUTOMATIC VENDOR EVALUATION

Dear SDN Experts & MM Gurus,
I had run automatic vendor evaluation in back groung . I need your experities in the following queries .
1. system is giving messsage weighing Key doesnot exists for the purchase organization & in overall score in Me62 or Me63 transaction showing Zero for all vendors .what is the difference between Me63 & me62 display.
2. After running the report for all vendors i want to view the comparision list or Rank for all vendors .
3. i would like to view the report by vendor code main crtieria scores & overall score ,but system is not showing report in this format ,is there any report where i can get the automatic vendor evaluated list in this form.
Thanks in Advance .
regards,
Injeti.

please advice /comment on the above query .
regds,
injeti

Best practice for Logical OR pre-condition evaluation

Greetings,
I'm finding TS doesn't have basic features for decision making (imp) for execution. Any recommendations are welcomed and appreciated. Please see below scenario.
I'd like to execute setup steps (custom step types) for a signal generator based upon the user selected "Test".
To keep it simple for the signal generator let's say we have the following steps:
Set Freq | Set PWR lvl | Set Modulation Type | Set Modulation ON/OFF | Set RF Power ON/OFF
For User Selected Tests let's say we have Test A(0) | Test B(1) | Test C(2) (Test A & C requires Modulation, B does not)
Here's my issue:
I can't get SET Freq | SET PWR lvl | Set RF Power ON/OFF to execute a pre-condition setup for evaluating Logical OR's. (i.e. locals.TestSelected ==0||1||2)
Same for Set Modulation Type | Set Modulation ON/OFF (i.e locals.TestSelected ==0||2)
Thanks in advance for any guidance provided.
Chazzzmd78
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Just want to clarify, there seems to be a misunderstanding about the difference between bitwise OR (i.e. the | operator) and logical OR (i.e. the || operator). Bitwise OR results in the combination of all of the bits which represent an integer stored as binary, while logical OR (i.e. what you really want in this case) results in a True, non-zero, value (usually 1) if either operand is non-zero.
Also, the == operator has a higher precedence than either the bitwise OR or logical OR operators.
So what this means:
locals.TestSelected ==0||1||2
is to give a result of True (i.e. 1) if either locals.TestSelected ==0, 1 is non-zero, or 2 is non-zero. Since 1 and 2 are always non-zero that expression will actually always result in a True value.
Similarly, although the following will likely give you the behavior you want:
(locals.TestSelected == 0) | (locals.TestSelected == 1) | (locals.TestSelected == 3)
That's not really doing what you are probably thinking it does. It's actually getting the value True (i.e. 1) for each of the sub-expressions in parethesis and then bitwise OR'ing them together. Since the result for the == operand is always either 0 or 1, this ends up giving the same result as logical OR (i.e. the || operator), but what you really want in this case is logical OR and for other expressions using bitwise OR when you mean logical OR might give you incorrect results. So, you should really be using something like the following:
Locals.TestSelected == 0 || locals.TestSelected == 1 || locals.TestSelected == 3
The parenthesis don't really matter in this case (so can be left out, but also doesn't hurt anything so you can leave them in if you prefer) because the == operator has a higher precedence than the || operator so all of the == operations will be done first.
Hope this helps clarify things,
-Doug

Zeros in reports causing a problem

Hello All,
Scenario
We have been getting Asterisks in the "results" row in some of the reports. The obvious cause was presence of transactions with different units. On investigation i found the key figures (columns showing the asterisks in results) had a value '0' in some rows. This value had no unit assigned either. When i looked into that particular cube in the multi-provider that was resulting in these '0' s i found that these transactions had no entries for that key figure in the cube. They were blank. There were other characteristics and key figures for the same transaction that were populated.
Cause:
When the query is run this key figure along with others is populated for transactions which are pulled from Cube A. Transactions are also pulled from cube B for the same keys figures and characteristics but cube B has no values for this one particular key figure and all those rows in the report are replaced by a 0 without unit.
I tried changing the query properties to "Suppress Zeros" and "Do not display Zeros" but this only results in not showing the zeros. The result still has an asterisks.
I also tried changing the "Calculate result as - from 'summation' to 'not defined'" but this is effecting the query because the query has two conditions defined and using "not defined" causes the query to ignore the conditions and give the 'overall result'. SO it is necessary that we use Summation
My Question: Is this the case with all queries - blank transactions in the cube showing up as '0' without units and giving an '*' for the results? If not is there any way we can change the settings or define the key figures to avoid getting these zeros and leave the blank transactions as blanks in the report too and get a proper result in the result rows?
I would really appreciate if someone could please get back to me with solutions/suggestions as soon as possible. Helpful replies will be awarded points.
Thank You.
Message was edited by:
MM

SSS,
Excellent suggestion! Made a note to remember this.... however
Correct me if i am wrong - This setting would result in allowing mixed values in ALL the reports. I am not sure if the reporting team would allow that. Unfortunately being in the development team i am not authorized to set this and test if it works but i will definitely suggest this and see what the reporting team's response is.
Quick question: Would this setting also solve the '' in the result? I understand that 'mixed currencies' setting outputs numeric value. Would absence of a unit for this numeric value (which in this case is just a '0') still result in '' for the overall result. If it does then i am back to square one.

Deserve 10pts for the suggestion...unfortunately at this time can assign only 6pts!
Thank You!
Message was edited by:
MM

Time evaluation to generate future quotas

Hi Gurus,
We must generate absence quotas for the future(year 2015) cause personnel must request absences for next year.
We run time evaluation till 01/01/2015 to generate quotas: 2015 quotas were generated correctly.
If we run time evaluation till december 2014, all entitlements of year 2015 are reset to zero( IT2006-Absence quota).
Is this a standard sap behaviour? the only solution is to set time evaluation till the 1st of january of the next year?
Thanks a lot.
Marco.

Hi Marco,
I recommend you consider your schema and quota generation rules (V_T559L) in detail to see how system generates quota. As you know 1st of each year is a key date to generate and accrued quota to EEs.
I think the quota generation rules check the 1st day of year and gives the quota to EE. What will happen if you run time evaluation till 2015? Is there any problem in this case.
If you would you can make a small schema with separated PCRs just for qota generation in such a cases to run and generate just quota without any other effect. In this way you can develp new PCRs with new rules in V_T559L to generate quota at the end of 2014. You should take care the quota validation be the same as you would.
Regards,
Omid

TE chnages value maintained in the field of deduction to of IT2007 to zero

Hi Experts
At client site positive Time management is implemented without Quota . Client is using IT2007 to store approved OT.
Accordingly OT is updated with Hours in IT2007 on particular date. After the execution of Time evaluation it checks for clock in and Clock Out time in IT2011 and then updates the deduction to field in IT2007 with hours of OT(eg 6 hrs). For this approved OT (eg 6 hrs), payment is given to employee.
In the month of May payment is given correctly for all OT updated in IT2007. But during the June payroll retro was run by system itself with deduction of some OT paid in May.
This has affected only few employees. During analysis it has been found that before actual Payroll run normal TE was executed by user which has changed the value in IT2007 to 0(deduction to field). Due to zero value payroll ran retro and deducted amount. After payroll execution the TE was rerun which has changed the zero value to original one (eg 6 hrs). For this strange behaviour of TE we have checked if there is any master data change but we did not found any change in Master data.
We are surprised without master data change the value in IT2007 became zero after TE.When we rerun TE it became again original approved OT hours (eg 6 hrs).
What could be possible reason for strange behaviour of TE ?

Hi,
When i was trying to do the same, i was getting error.
"adapter exception, context binding of property value unresolved"..i tried many times but same.
Seems some problem with context mapping/binding.
i deleted the entire componenet and created a fresh one. Its working fine now.
I thought i am missing something for this data transfer. Many thanks for your inputs.
Regards,
Ajay

Stock transfer with zero stock

Hi all,
Stock tranfer is happening with zero stock.
Is there any way to avoid this ?
Thanks
Jeyakanthan

Hi Jeyakanthan,
If you have already selected 'Block below negative quantity', please check Item Master Data ->Stock Tab: checkbox for
'Manage Stock by Warehouse' is ticked or not.
With it ticked, the system considers the stock in each warehouse and none of the warehouses can go into negative stock for this item.
If this box is not ticked, the system calculates the overall stock availability and e.g. if you do a stock transfer for an item from warehouse A to warehouse B, you will never go into negative stock in an overall view for this particular item although it is negative in warehouse A.
To sum up, you need to check the box "Manage Inventory by Warehouse" in the "Item Master Data" and at the same time "Block below negative quantity" checkbox in the Document Settings in order to block negative quantity by warehouse.
I hope this answers your question.
Regards,
Ivy Zhang
SAP Business One Forums Team

Overall Evaluation is Zero

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for