Overloads SOLUTIONS

Hi Guys,
I've had like most of you, soooo many Overload messages "Disk Too Slow" etc... OK, Now listen well and do the following:
1- NEVER record Audio on you Main Drive (the one that contains the System) NEVER!!!!
2- Disable Journaling On your Drives as Journaling SLOWS down disk Read/Write.
3- Try Increasing Buffer Size when Mixing, and Decreasing Buffer Size when recording.
4- DEFRAG your Drives guys, we All forget to do maintenance to our Drives.
5- Use Only Good Firewire Drives, Firewire 800 Recommended, don't expect Performance out of USB or USB 2 Drives.
*These are the Basic steps that all of you should follow to avoid these annoying OVERLOADs
I worked on a session thats 40 minutes long, with 122 Audio tracksplus many audio instruments and Loads of plugins on each track, 16 Reverbs open, VSS3,Spacedesigner,TC etc...... and I had no problems mixing down this project, I moved from drive to drive till I found out the Journaling problem, it also didnt work well on my internal second ATA drive,so....you got it??

I should just shut up about this as it's been done to death and not really that huge a deal for me but i went through something similar in Sonar a couple of versions or so ago and and deeply sympathetic to those experiencing the problem. My guess is there's something deep broken and it will take them a while to fix it. i just don't want it papered over and brushed aside. As to bloat ware, well, yes and no. Logic is the only major that doesn't have a quality audio warp tool. PT's is pretty darn nice, especially if you need to keep phase relations intact over several tracks. Sonar's AudioSnap is incredibly powerful set of tools but makes the user work a bit a bit more. it comes with Izotope's logs included - the one's we pay, what, $300 bucks for? Live is incredible and Steiny's got theirs. Even Reaper, for $50; sheeesh. In this day and age it's a tool that should have been in 8, no two ways about it. While we're at it, audio comping, even even if swiping worked correctly is still pretty weak compared to the others. I use it because it's easy to write on. Let's just hope they fix it. I should be able to run 32 tracks with plenty of plugs at 64 sample latency without breaking a sweat on this machine. As it is I have to go to 256 to record 2 at a time with that track count.
Anyway, you're way ahead on all this and now i will shut up.

Similar Messages

Possible overloads solution...

Again I can only speak based on the hardware I have, but I know the overloads problem is affecting A LOT of LP8 users.
I went thru the tedious process of trying to get a more permanent solution to the constant Overloads problems I had even on very small projects (1 Audio track and 4 Virtual Instrument tracks). I had tried just about every suggestion and because I wanted to be sure I had a solution I had to exit LP8 and restart LP8 after each change I made.
To make a long story short, the ONLY combination I had not tried under Preferences | Audio | Devices | Core Audio was setting the I/O buffer size to 256 and checking I/O safety (I had tried every other combination from 32 - 1024 with and without I/O safety checked). And viola suddenly my project was no longer getting any overloads and my CPU utilization was pretty good/low.
Of course, I need to do a lot more testing and considerably more complex projects, but at least I'm moving in a more positive direction rather than a hopeless direction. I still feel such a simple project should NEVER reach any overloads regardless of my buffer settings and I've got plenty of System.logs with hard samples of real problems with LP8. So don't take this a LP8 is all good now, this is just a possible solution that is working for now and has at least made LP8 useful rather than useless to me.
My Hardware:
2 Dual Core processors (aka a Quad MacPro) @ 3GHz
8GB RAM
ATI 1900XT 512MB Video
Motu Ultralite
4 internal drives (1 500GB HD, 2 500GB RAID, 1 300GB Bootcamp Vista)
Mackie Control
Mackie C4 Pro
MAudio Axiom 25
So my suggestion is take the time to go thru EVERY single possible combination of I/O Buffer Size and I/O Safety enable/disable setting and be sure you exit LP8 after each setting change BEFORE you test.
Hope this helps, Rob.
Message was edited by: Rob A.

Your sig shows you're still on Tiger. I only started having these problems when I moved to 10.5.1.
Another solution for me was to select every track before the first play. BTW, the overloads would go away for the most part after every track had done a first play. Once every track had been "initialized", overloads were pretty rare (prior to the 256 buffer setting). But this was of course a very painful process to keep doing everytime I opened a project. The 256 buffer + safety I/O solutions seems to work so far. It's still very much a big coding problem for LP8, but at least I'm finding liveable work arounds til Apple fix it.
Rob

SYSTEM OVERLOAD SOLUTION! MAYBE...

Hi guys!
For everybody who are fighting against this annoying problem!
I read about somewhere here, somebody wote about there is a folder:
Macintosh HD/Library/Audio/Midi Drivers
Somebody has drivers there, and somebody dont have.
In this folder i had two drivers: EmagicUSBMIDIDriver.plugin and EMUMIDIDriver.plugin
I dont know these two drivers are necessary or not, - i have EMU USB 0202 soundcard - but i tried, what will happen, if i take out this two drivers, just like that.
I put these files in a safe folder, in case if something problem would come.
This happened: NO MORE SYSTEM OVERLOAD ANYMORE to me!
All the Logic softwers and plugins works fine, no stopping all the time, no system overloads in every 5 seconds.
Also, often the iTunes running, because i always compare my music with another pro music, and no system overload at all!
=)
Only, when i tried to open Firefox with 12 tabs during playback.
=)
Try this too, and wrote to here, what is the result!
I hope it will stay, and it will help many other users too!

Have you seen these?
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24535?viewlocale=en_US
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3161
Two more tips from me: Be sure to NOT have a Software Instrument track selected when playing back. The instrument then is 'ready to be played' and therefore needs more CPU. If you select an audio track, aux track or a frozen SI track, it is easier on the CPU.
Secondly, set all audio tracks to *No Input*. That has ben reliably reported to make a difference too.
Thirdly (bonus) set the *Process Buffer Range* (in the Audio prefs) to Large.
Also, keep in mind that just muting a in the track header doesn't disable anything, the content is still streamed. Only when you mute the regions, the content is left out of the process.
regards, Erik.

AEM CQ5.6 - page properties editing functionality depending on templates

Hello everyone,
I want to provide a view (UI touched) to the editor/user different page properties depending on the template within CQ 5.6. Let's say I have three templates which have a bunch of common page properties. Additionally they have some different properties. In the end the user should see (with UI touched overlay) different page properties depending on different templates. This is regarding to the page which already exist and also when the user want to create a page based on a special template.
What I have done so far:
1) For existing pages.
For exsiting pages I have overloaded and addapted /libs/cq/gui/components/siteadmin/admin/childpage/childpage.jsp
Additionally I have overloaded /libs/wcm/core/content/sites/bulkproperties/items/content/items/tabs/items depending on my template.
2) No solution found for creating of new pages
Is there a way to solve this issue in easy way? I guess the overloading "solution" on the UI touch is a way to excessive.
If there is a way to solve it, please provide how to do it.
Thanks in advance
Vladimir
To make it more clear I made a screenshot of what I want to do. Please note there is no need to touch the /libs.

For the template to have a custom page properties in addition to the fields that belong to template that it inherits, a dialog has to be defined in template implementation and the required (new) fields should be defined in there. By doing so, the page properties will show the fields that are in parent template + that in the current custom template in question.

Solution for "Error while trying to synchronize Audio and MIDI" and "System Overload" messages

Article for those who hate Logic error windows
Seen in Logic Pro 9.1.7 on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4
and Logic Pro 9.0.0 on Mac OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.5
Logic Pro:
System Overload.
The audio engine was not able to process all required data in time.
(-10011)
Error while trying to synchronize Audio and MIDI.
Sample Rate xxxxx recognized.
Check conflict between Logic Pro and external device.
The search in the help given as follows: overload occurs when you use a lot of tracks and a lot of effects on them, and the synchronization is lost when the selected MIDI track for recording or playback. Yes, this is all that is written in the resources. And here are useful tips that have been found:
The Bounce function allows the entire instrument track to be recorded as an audio file. This bounced audio file can then be used (as an audio region) on a standard audio track, allowing you to reassign the available processing power for further software instrument tracks. For more details, see "Bouncing Your Project."
You can also make use of the Freeze function to capture the output of a software instrument track, again saving processing power. For details, see "Freezing Tracks in the Arrange Area."
These tips - about the timing. About overload - there are no tips, except as "reducing the number of plug-ins" and "increasing latency". Zero useful tips - I got two errors in the test project with a blank audio track with no effects, MIDI drums and standard synthesizer, it was no aux buses, and the entire project was only a single plugin in the master track.
Here is the configuration of my computer:
iMac12, 2
CPU: Intel Core i5 3,1 GHz
Memory: 4 GB
And here's a project that almost immediately stops Logic, all instruments and plug-ins with the init-patch, ie not the most demanding settings:
It's sad.
When this happened the first time, I could start the project only if the empty audio track has been selected, a track specially designed so that you can at least start the project. Then, this problem has evaporated along with the changing conditions of work and I forgot about it until the last case.
I was looking for the cause of the problem in the console and the system monitor for two days, and finally I found that Logic ping to the network frequently. I remembered the exact time of occurrence of the problem, and system logs revealed that the problems began immediately, as soon as I deactivate the service of the Internet.
Solution: enable the Internet, or add a new network service on a computer with no Internet. I just created the Ethernet connection to the ip address 1.0.0.0
Logic immediately began to sing.

Hi gabaghoul
Yes, it worked for me on four different OS and Logic versions (10.6 - 10.8 and 9.0 - 9.1.6)
It does not work in some cases, hard enough to tell in which one, but you can try, it very easy: go to the net settings and create new Ethernet connection to the ip address 1.0.0.0 and connect LAN cable to the port.
Also you can try to figure out what happens in your system while Logic error occured - fot that you just start Console and search "logicpro"
Pay attention to repetitive events in a console and events with suitable timing, not so far from error
The problem may be related to the GUI or system memory, sometimes turning off Safari (or Chrome, others browsers) might help.
Message was edited by: spred

Disk is too slow or System Overload. (-10010) The #SuddenMotionSensor - CAN I TURN THIS OFF sick of it popping up! any solutions? #logic9

Disk is too slow or System Overload. (-10010) The #SuddenMotionSensor - CAN I TURN THIS OFF sick of it popping up! any solutions? #logic9
i have an external firwire harddrive just for the audio projects which is 7200rpm etc and it has 500gb of free space on it!
i've already tried the pmset -a sms 0 thing, but that is only for laptops, their seems to be no solition for Mac Pro Desktops!
this is annoying.
hope someone can help.
Dan

and in laptops it is just working for the original builtin HD.
It shouldn't be there at all.
you set it off by (copy/paste):
sudo pmset -a sms 0

Need solution for "HEAVY" overload.

This is not the classic case of most of the system overload problems that I've been reading about, where a few settings might do the tricks, although if that's the case, then great! But I doubted...
Here's my gear:
-QUAD 6.5 GB 2 drives, 250GB + 500GB
-RAID 2 X 500 GB
-Logic
-Redmatic
-VSL
The problem I'm having is a system overload regularly, and buffer is at largest. I work with very dense orchestration, Richard Strauss type and I never use less than 70 instruments, mostly performance, lots of scales and runs, articulations... I cannot afford to work with this problem of "system overload", and freezing tracks don't help, it actually works better in RAM. I need a SURE way to resolve this, what can I do?
Thanks
Guy
Mac OS X (10.4.3) Quad 2 drives 250GB and 500GB, Raid 2 X 500GB, Logic, VSL

I am not saying don't use logic, just offload some of the work to another application or system. For your work, I don't think kontakt would be a good idea. I am not totally in the VSL loop but I have heard that they are moving into software as well, as in working on a host. Otherwise another sampler as standalone and/or another system used as a EXS player, because you probably want integration for your libraries. Kontakt would not be a good idea because it is more aimed at sound design from a sampler than max poly, and there are some really big issues for most users. I realize you have a great computer for this, but Logic just wasn't built this way-that's the cold fact. Perhaps they'll update this sometime but in the meantime you have work to do. Also, the VSL forum is a better place to ask, IMO. Not saying this is a bad place but everyone there is loading up a VSL lib and this is a huge library. You could try loading 2 instances of Logic...

Best solution to avoid System overloads

Hi
I just bought a MBP 2.4 17" and want to find out which is the best way for recording without
system overloads.
1) Audio (for recording) and Samples on 2 external(separate) FW drives
2) Samples on external FW drive and recording on Mac Book Pro
thanks in advance
criote

i actually learned yesterday, that locking tracks is a great way to free up CPU. what it does, is it writes to the hard drive. you can still pan and raise and lower volume, but to further edit you must unlock the track. so if you are building many tracks, lock the ones you're not working with at the moment, and play with the rest. then lock those, unlock the others to keep working. working this way is a wee bit slow, because you have to render the track to the hard drive. but it allows you to keep building.
Another great way is to use the bus. for example if some of your tracks have the same insert/plug-in, then use it on a bus instead of doing the same thing to each track individually. putting it on the bus, frees up CPU as well.
I hope this helps... I was so happy yesterday to find out that putting effects on a bus to many tracks not only helped my sound, but also freed up CPU.
just make sure that if you lock your tracks, you've set the song locators to where the song begins and ends... otherwise you might end up rendering a whole lot of nothing after your song is done.
all the best.

I've paid for my Mountain Lion and can see the transaction in my itunes account, but it fails to download for the past 36 hours. Any solutions, or is the system heavily overloaded?

Can anyone help with this issue? It's hard to beleive that Apple is having such a protracted problem...

Sorry to hear that, it does seem to be stateside where the problems are (been to Vancouver, great City by the way ) Here I downloaded ML at 8pm last night with no issues. I didn't click the main banner I clicked Mountain Lion under I think it was productivity, not sure if that made any difference though tbh. Its worth the wait, runs beautifully so far on my Mid 2011 i7 iMac. If you can maybe try taking your Mac to an Apple store and see if they have better bandwidth for the download.

What is solution of nat failover with 2 ISPs?

Now I have lease line link to 2 ISPs for internet connection. I separate packets of users by accesslist such as www go to ISP1 and mail or other protocol go to ISP2 . Let's say link go to ISP1 down I need www traffics failover to ISP2 and vice versa.
Problem is acl on nat statement?
If you config about this.
access-l 101 permit tcp any any www -->www traffic to ISP1
access-l 101 permit tcp any any mail --> back up for mail packet to ISP2 down
access-l 102 permit tcp any any mail -->mail packet to ISP2
access-l 102 permit tcp any any www --> back up for www traffic go to ISP2
ip nat inside source list 101 interface s0 overload
ip nat inside source list 102 interface s1 overload
In this case is links of ISP1 and ISP2 are UP.
when you apply this acl on nat statement then nat will process each statement in order( if I incorrect please correct me) so mail traffics will match in this acl and then nat with ip of ISP1 only.
please advice solution about this
TIA

Hi,
If you have two serial links connecting to two diff service provider , then you can try this .
access-l 101 permit tcp any any www
access-l 102 permit tcp any any mail
route-map isp1 permit 10
match ip address 101
set interface s0
route-map isp2 permit 10
match ip address 102
set interface s1
ip nat inside route-map isp1 interface s0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map isp2 interface s1 overload
ip nat inside source list 103 interface s0 overload
ip nat inside source list 104 interface s1 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s1 100
In case if any of the link fails , automatically the other traffic would prefer the other serial.
I have not tried the config , just worked out the config on logic .pls go through and try if possible
pls see the note2 column
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093fca.shtml#related
Hope it helps
regards
vanesh k

NAT overload is not working when i configure Double NAT for VPN

I have Cisco 2921 router with OS version 15.1(4)M1.
the router is configured for NAT overload and working fine, i have site to site VPN tunnel with peer with normal NAT translation. now we need to configure Double NAT on the VPN tunnel as we need to free the subnet on peer network. for double nat i use 3.2.21.x - 3.2.23.x / 24 network and apply following command
Double NAT translation
ip nat inside source static network 192.168.10.0 3.2.21.0 /24 no-alias
ip nat inside source static network 192.168.20.0 3.2.22.0/24 no-alias
ip nat inside source static network 192.168.30.0 3.2.23.0 /24 no-alias
Nonat
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.21.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.22.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.23.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
VPN encrypted traffic over the tunnel
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.21.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.22.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.23.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
Problem:
as soon as i apply Double NAT translation command the NAT overload stop working and client cannot reach to the internet
the router partial configuration is as below
REACH-R01(config)#do sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 19233 bytes
! Last configuration change at 09:56:45 MST Tue Jan 29 2013 by admin
! NVRAM config last updated at 13:57:54 MST Wed Jan 30 2013
! NVRAM config last updated at 13:57:54 MST Wed Jan 30 2013
version 15.1
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname REACH-R01
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
card type t1 0 0
logging buffered 51200 warnings
no aaa new-model
clock timezone MST -7 0
clock summer-time MST recurring
network-clock-participate wic 0
network-clock-select 1 T1 0/0/0
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.20.1 192.168.20.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.20.250 192.168.20.255
ip dhcp pool CISCO_PHONES
network 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.20.254
option 150 ip 192.168.20.254
no ip domain lookup
ip domain name reach.local
ip inspect name ethernetin ftp timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin h323 timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin http timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin rcmd timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin realaudio timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin smtp timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin sqlnet timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin streamworks timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin tcp timeout 3600
ip inspect name ethernetin tftp timeout 30
ip inspect name ethernetin udp timeout 15
ip inspect name ethernetin vdolive timeout 3600
multilink bundle-name authenticated
isdn switch-type primary-ni
trunk group PRI
crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3180627716
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-3180627716
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3180627716
voice-card 0
dsp services dspfarm
voice service voip
allow-connections sip to sip
fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none
sip
voice translation-rule 1
rule 5 /^7804981231/ /401/
voice translation-rule 2
rule 5 // /7804981231/
voice translation-profile DID_INBOUND
translate called 1
voice translation-profile DID_OUTBOUND
translate calling 2
license udi pid CISCO2911/K9 sn FGL1540114P
license accept end user agreement
license boot module c2900 technology-package securityk9
hw-module ism 0
hw-module pvdm 0/0
username test test
redundancy
controller T1 0/0/0
cablelength long 0db
pri-group timeslots 1-6,24
no ip ftp passive
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes 256
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key P@ssw0rd address 33.33.33.33 no-xauth
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA esp-aes 256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto map VPN-TUNNEL 1 ipsec-isakmp
description COMPUGEN
set peer 33.33.33.33
set transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA
match address 115
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description Outside Interface To the Internet
ip address dhcp
ip access-group outside_access_in in
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map VPN-TUNNEL
interface ISM0/0
ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/1.20
service-module ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.255.0
!Application: CUE Running on ISM
service-module ip default-gateway 192.168.20.254
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.10
description VLAN 10 DATA VLAN
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip inspect ethernetin in
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20
description VLAN 20 VOICE VLAN
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 192.168.20.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.30
description VLAN 30 WIRELESS VLAN
encapsulation dot1Q 30
ip address 192.168.30.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip inspect ethernetin in
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface ISM0/1
description Internal switch interface connected to Internal Service Module
no ip address
interface Serial0/0/0:23
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-ni
isdn incoming-voice voice
trunk-group PRI
no cdp enable
interface Vlan1
no ip address
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http access-class 23
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip http path flash:CME8.6/GUI
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 443 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 443
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 25 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 25
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 1723 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 1723
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 3389 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 3389
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 123 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 123
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.10.10 987 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 987
ip nat inside source list 101 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/0 75.152.248.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 75.152.248.1 254
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 205.206.0.1 254
ip route 192.168.20.2 255.255.255.255 ISM0/0
ip access-list extended outside_access_in
permit udp any any eq bootps
permit udp any any eq bootpc
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 1723
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 3389
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq smtp
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 443
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq domain
permit udp any host 22.22.22.22 eq domain
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 123
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 unreachable
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 echo-reply
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 packet-too-big
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 time-exceeded
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 traceroute
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 administratively-prohibited
permit icmp any host 22.22.22.22 echo
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 987
permit tcp any host 22.22.22.22 eq 47
permit gre any host 22.22.22.22
permit udp any host 22.22.22.22 eq isakmp
permit esp any host 22.22.22.22
access-list 23 permit any
access-list 101 deny   ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.21.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.22.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 deny   ip 3.2.23.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 110 permit ip 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.21.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.22.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 115 permit ip 3.2.23.0 0.0.0.255 3.2.1.0 0.0.0.255
Solution: Support forums team

I have the same problem also. Restarting isn't helping and the auto lock/unlock button is on. Plus a couple of time when I turn it on it is asking if I want to power off. That is when I push the button on the front to wake it up. Not the power button on top. I have an IPAd 2. Worked fine before the update.

System Overload & How to get the best G4 Performance

Okay all you Logic and OSX Gurus. I need your help. I've finally made the LOGIC leap from OS9 and have hit the SYSTEM OVERLOAD wall like many of you before me.
I've been pouring over this, and many other Forums and Blogs, for about two weeks now, and have tried many of the fixes / solutions to no avail. I estimate I'm now getting about 25% of my OS9 Logic performance from Logic in OSX.
One specific case in point is this. A four minute song sketch. No tempo changes. Four midi tracks, 6 Audio instruments and 2 EFX (1 Guitar Amp Pro, 1 Space Designer that's no even being used).
I have unsuccessfully tried to Bounce this to disc for two weeks now. The AUDIO and DISK I/O Meters barely register until the GUITAR AMP PRO track brings the AUDIO METER up to about 1/3rd usage. At various points in the Bounce the G4 will completely FREEZE, and I will have manually restart.
THINGS I HAVE TRIED, and continue to try are:
- Repairing Permissions
- Trashing Preferences
- Updating MOTU Drivers
- Changing Processor performance setting - which I cannot do BTW, because my system does not seem to support this option.
- Closing all Widgets
- Freeing up more Space on my Mac OSx startup disk (I now have 78.41 Gig available on a 114.49 Gig drive)
- Run Cocktail to clean up System logs and temporary files
- FREEZING TRACKS as a temporary 'fix'. This did nothing BTW but add more strain to the CPU and I still had about 1/3rd the usage with my GUITAR AMP Plugin (and it still crashed).
- Increased AUDIO BUFFER to 1024
So, (and I guess this is really two sides of the same question)...
1) How do I FIX this SYSTEM OVERLOAD problem, and
2) How do I "optimize" my Dual 1.25 G4 in order to get the best performance possible out of LOGIC PRO?
OTHER QUESTIONS I HAVE ARE:
- Does the G4 have the processing power needed to run LOGIC PRO?
- I'm confident adding RAM will "help" (can't hurt), but am I really dealing with a RAM Problem here or, again, can these processors really handle it?
BTW - I'm not looking for an excuse to go shopping for a Quad G5 (I mean who needs an excuse... . But, I'm really trying to determine if at the end of the day I will spend money on RAM, Hard Drives, whatever..., and then still be frustrated and end up shopping.
- Are SCSI drives a problem with Tiger / Logic? These Cheetah drives are fast (10,000 RPM), reliable, and have been great drives to record on. I'm trying to do this simple bounce to one of the Cheetahs and as I said it's just not happening.
- Does the startup volume size effect performance?
- Does the amount of free space on the start up drive effect performance?
- Firewire 400 vs 800? My sample library is on the Firewire drive, and I'm thinking this does not pull a lot on the CPU as these get loaded into memory before playing? Am I right about that? It is Firewire 400.
A long letter and a lot of questions. I thank you all in advance for any answers, guidance or direction you can give. Please also let me know if there is something I HAVEN'T asked, looked at or should be doing.
Best,
Kevin
Kevin Saunders Hayes
SYSTEM SPECS
Machine Name: Power Mac G4
Machine Model: PowerMac3,6
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (3.3)
Number Of CPUs: 2
CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
L3 Cache (per CPU): 2 MB
Memory: 1 GB
Bus Speed: 167 MHz
Boot ROM Version: 4.4.8f2
Logic 7.1.1 (885)
Pro Application Support 3.1
MOTU 896 - Latest drivers
2 - Seagate Cheetah 9 gig SCSI drives
1 - Oxford Firewire (Up to 400 Mb/sec) with EXS Library
G4 Duel 1.25 Mac OS X (10.4.3)

And after months of using Express, and a week of
using Logic, I hadn't had a system overload until
today. Now I'm having them all the time. It wasn't a
set up change, it wasn't running on the battery, it
wasn't running software monitoring, it's set up with
512 i/o buffer, medium processor buffer. And it
wasn't brought on by number of tracks - that's for
sure. After it started happenind and I took a break &
came back, I was sitting on my couch, Powerbook in
my lap, tapping a beat in with the onscreen
keyboard.... a SINGLE instrument, mind you. NO plugs,
no other tracks of ANY kind. And it happened.
There's a lot of great, relevant and very helpful info on this forum and it all helps and it all counts. But..... so many people are suffering this when moving up to Pro 7 from either Pro 6 or Express. One expects a change in system load when a major update comes along but more and more people are reporting that simply recording 1 or 2 tracks of audio, pure, no plug-ins or EQ is causing an overload whereas in the previous version(s) this was easily accomodated. This, you may have guessed, has happened to me as well. Are we to accept in 1 version increment (albeit a major one) there is such a massive increase in demand from hardware that you cannot record a pure no-plug-in stereo track? When going back to 6.4.3 it will happily record 8 at once, let you EQ and reverb and then do another 8 AND then another. With no troble at all.
It is pointing more and more towards fundamental flaws in the programming. Did L7 come out too soon? Are we just beta testing what is pro software? We are only on 7.1.1 and 6 went to 6.4.3 but at no stage was it this bad at the fundamentals of what the App is for. I love Logic, I really do, but I think, even with all the great help we are fighting what Apple should be addressing. Not that you can find/contact/talk to or get any sort of response from them.
I have tried but have gone back to 6.4.3 until 7.1.2 or even 7.2 appears, but I'm not paying for 7.2. My £200 upgrade from 6.4.3 is now sitting on a shelf desperately wanting to use it.

Lion Clean Install - No Disc Required - Recovery Partition Solution

There is a way to run a Lion clean install without unpacking the installation onto a new disc or thumb drive. It can be accomplished via a slightly longer, two-step upgrade process, which requires wiping your hard drive after you've upgraded to Lion. You must be able to connect to the internet for this option to work, as it will require downloading the install package again.
As always, be sure to back up your data before performing any sort of wipe of your hard drive.
STEP 1 - Initial Upgrade
Perform a normal Lion upgrade through the App Store. This will install Lion on top of your current configuration. It will also create a Recovery Partition, which is a new feature of the Lion OS. It is this Recovery Partition that you will use to perform the clean install.
STEP 2 - Wipe and Clean Install
Restart your computer into Recovery mode. This can be done by either holding down CMD-r during boot up, or holding down the Option key during bootup and selecting to boot from the Recovery partition.
Select the Disk Utility option from the main menu. Here you can select the main partition, click on the Erase tab at the top, and completely erase the partition. Once you've done this, quit Disk Utility Option, and you will return to the main menu.
Select the Lion Installation option. It will ask you to connect to the internet if you have not done so already (if wireless, you can do this via the Wi-Fi icon in the top right corner). It will also ask you to input your Apple ID login and password in order to verify that you've already purchased the software. The installation will take as long as it requires to download the package again. Once downloaded and installed, Lion will walk you through initial set up.
This solution worked for me, but I make no guarantees that it will work for others.

I've created a boot disk (several actually) following the methods outlined in this guide.
http://www.eggfreckles.net/tech/burning-a-lion-boot-disc/
I've also saved the installer dmg in several backup locations so it can be burned again fresh or transfered to bootable USB thumb drives.
The Lion install disk boots up and operates just like the Recovery Partition (Disk Utiltiy and all) with one giant benefit, you don't have to log into the MacAppStore with all it's complications or require a lenghtly internet download to install Lion.
So you won't see this annoying screen and have to wait a few hours if the servers are overloaded.
The boot disk also installs considerably faster. Two giant benefits actually.
Also once Lion is installed, Bootcamp can be used to partition the drive, then the Recovery Partiton > Disk Utiltiy used to change the BOOTCAMP partition to HFS+ journaled and then 10.6 can be installed or cloned from a external drive onto the BOOTCAMP partition.
Dual boot Snow/Lion is possible with a large enough boot drive.

What setting should I use for Abbey Road drums? Getting a cpu overload issue

What setting should I use for Abbey Road drums (i.e. multi-output, stereo, etc)? Getting a cpu overload issue. I have a macbook pro, 4 gb ram, running Logic Pro 9. Just 3 tracks of drums and a few real instrument tracks. Can't find a guide in the manual for either Kontakt or Logic. Thanks in advance!

Hi
AR drums are complete resource (CPU) hogs. They work better if you turn off as many of the AR internal plugins as you can.
See section 4 (?) of the AR manual, which you can find within Kontakt (In the library area of Kontakt click hold the small "i" on the right of the "AR drummer" Library).
Alternatively, your only solution is to increase the I/O buffer in Preferences:Audio, with the associated increase in latency
CCT

Any solutions for URL based routing

Hi,
I have an ASA 5505 that has 2 route (1 route connecting to MPLS VPN to HK branch office and 1 route connecting to Internet service provider). As you know, ISP in China blocking many web sites (such as facebook, youtube or etc.). So , I would like to route the traffic when the user in China office would like to browse facebook.com or youtube.com to HK ASA and egress to the internet by NAT. However, all other traffic remain to route to ISP in China, so that the Internet traffic in HK office will not be overload and the user in China can browse facebook.com or youtube.com.
I have researched a topic of regular expression with Modular Policy Framework (MPF). I expected that if the ASA can match the traffic, I can set next hop to HK office's ASA. However, this feature does not support https so that my expectation failed. Because the login page and sometime these web site using https for encryption. I hope URL based routing work on both http and https can work.
Do anyone have any solutions to resolve this situation? Please kindly provide it to me. I would appreiciate it if you could also provide configuration example with commands. I look forward to hearing from anyone soon. Thank you.
Regards,
Lapson Wong

What you are trying to do is policy-based routing which is not supported on the ASA. MPF is used only for inspection and QoS type serverices.
If using a proxy is not an option, you would need to put in a router that would send the desired traffic over the WAN network. another option, though I would not recommend it, is to find all the IPs of facebook, youtube, etc. and add static routes on the ASA pointing out the WAN interface.

Overloads SOLUTIONS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for