OWA isue when using proxy

Hi all,
First kindly informed that i used Exchange 2010 sp3 ( i did,'t find my version in the list )
when the internal users try to access owa by using proxy , thet succeed to login but after about 1 min they probt again to enter credential
if they disabled proxy everything is working fine
we use isa 2006 as proxy for internal users
owa is hosted on 2 cas servers ( DNS round Robin used )

Hi,
According to your description, credential is prompted after internal users login OWA with proxy enabled. And as far as I know, the credential issue is most likely caused by the improper authentication method.
Could you please check your authentication method for OWA? Based on my research, Integrated Authentication is not suitable for people who are connecting via proxy servers:
http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2010-outlook-web-app-authentication-settings/
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Popup for credentials when connecting to OWA/ECP when using HLB DNS name

Hi,
We're experiencing a strange problem when connecting to OWA/ECP.
Since a week or two, we get a popup for credentials when logging onto
https://mail.customer.com/owa.
When the credentials are filled in the first time, we keep receiving the popup, and can't get through.
We're using integrated authentication internally.
When connecting externally, we get a popup from a non domain-joined pc, but get passed correctly to owa and ECP.
We're using a load balancer that uses mail.customer.com, and distributes it over the 3 exchange servers.
When connecting directly to each exchange server, we get a certificate warning (which is logic), but after confirming we get passed to ecp or owa correctly.
Works :
https://exchangeserver1.customer.com/owa (after receiving certificate warning)
https://exchangeserver2.customer.com/owa (after receiving certificate warning)
https://exchangeserver3.customer.com/owa (after receiving certificate warning)
https://10.10.10.30/owa (after receiving certificate warning) > 10.10.10.30 is the VIP ip address used for loadbalancing
Doesn't work :
https://mail.customer.com/owa
When changing the hosts file, and set mail.customer.com to point directly to one of the exchange servers, it doesn't work either.
PS :
So mail.customer.com gets forwarded to the VIP ip address.
We don't experience any problems with outlook.

Hi
Chek if VIP FQDN is added to DNS
Check if RpcClientAccessServer parameter using Set-MailboxDatabase for each mailbox database in the appropriate site
Set-MailboxDatabase -RPCClientAccessServer "CASArrayFQDN"
Change AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUrl on each CAS using Set-ClientAccessServer
Change InternalUrl parameter on each CAS using Set-WebServicesVirtualDirectory Identity EWS*in the appropriate site
Change the InternalURI in the Exchange Control Panel, offline address book, and Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync (through management console under server management for each appropriate CAS)
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.
Regards,
Sathish

Performance degradation when using proxy.pac file with FF ESR 31

With Bug 923458 many people complained about a performance issue compared to other browsers when a proxy.pac file is used.
The issue initially reported with the bug was resolved for ESR25 according to the statistics, but the general performance issue remained.
I had the same issue with ESR24 and ESR31.3 .
I was testing with www.bild.de.
It took about 40 seconds to load the content completely. Without the proxy.pac file it took about 10 seconds.
I added a few alerts to the pac-File in order to get logs within the console for some analyses.
I found the following:
1. the pac.file is executed for every request, no matter if the host changed or not.
With us the pac-File checks for IP-Adresses and host-names only.
It is not necessary to execute the pac file for each and every request to the same remote host.
So the question is, if we are able to disable this behaviour via about:config?
2. the content referenced by www.bild.de seems to be loaded sequentially and with a delay
The overall time consumed by the proxy.pac file executions was about 4 Seconds compared to the 40 seconds of overall load time.
So I checked the delay between executions of the pac-file and found an overall delay of 40 seconds. I expect that the delay between the calls to the pac-file is caused by the retrieval of contents from the remote host.
So why are the requests executed sequentially?
Hint: Due to the times necessary for executing the pac-file and downloading the contents from the remote host, I would expect the logs generated by my alerts to be mixed (especially if myIpAddress took 1 Second). But the log is cleanly ordered by URL. (see attachment)

Hi guigs2,
thanks for your response. As we only use myIpAddress once within our pac-File and only rely on dnsDomainIs(), ==-Comparisons and shExpMatch() and the sum of all pac-Executions was about 4 seconds compared to 40 seconds overall load time, I do not think that dns resolving is our issue.
I checked the seetings of the configuration you mentioned above. It is set to "false", so the client would try the resolve the dns names. Our admin told, that we do not use socks-Proxies, only http-Proxies.
Regarding sequential load of the contents included on www.bild.de from other web sites, I attached a screenthot.
Please note the red highlights. These show the start time in milliseconds of the pac-execution. I added this as a kind of id which represents a unique identifier together with the URL if the log items are mixed. But they are not, instead they are cleanly ordered by URL (for all 360 pac-file calls).
Moreover in the picture you can see the delay between the end of the last pac-file execution and the next one (blue timestamp in millisonds compared to the red timestamp of the next row saying "entered proxy.pac"). The delay sum up exactly to the 40 seconds the FF took to load the page completely.
Alone the fragment shown represents a delay of 630ms between the pac-file executions. If the contents would be loaded in parallel, there should be no such delay.

Specific changes are left undetected when using proxy indirection

Hello!
Recently, the following issue have been identified:
ObjectReferenceMapping together with ProxyIndirectionPolicy and *UnitOfWorkValueHolder fails to identify specific changes - setting a reference to 'null' when the attribute's value was not instantiated previously.
Detailed description:
Consider we have 2 objects: A and B, and A has OneToOneMapping to B and uses ProxyIndirection.
In initial moment we have A1 that references B1 in DB.
Then we register A1 for modification. What we have in memory in UnitOfWork? Something like the following:
A1(Clone) with attribute for B reference uninstantiated;
A1(Backup) with <null> reference for B, as the attribute is expected to be retrieved when we access B from A1(Clone).
Then we set reference in A1(Clone) for B to <null>.
This change then will not be identified during commit phase, because of the result of getAttributeValueFromObject both for B reference in A1(Clone) and A1(Backup) is <null>. This part is clearly visible from the ObjectReferenceMapping.compareForChange method code:
if ( !owner.isNew() ) {
backUpAttribute = getAttributeValueFromObject(backUp);
if ( (backUpAttribute == null) && (cloneAttribute == null) ) {
return null;
Accessing the B field in A1(Clone) fixes the problem, because in this case backUpAttribute value is initialized through *UnitOfWorkValueHolder.
So it seems the part should be reworked to handle such cases, it seems reasonable that fields in backup clones that are using proxy indirection should be initialized even if not accessed to contain all required information to allow correct comparision in such cases.
Can somebody from TopLink team comment this?
Thanks,
Sergey

This does appear to be an issue. I will log this problem internally, you may want to follow it up with support.
A work around is to instantiate the proxy in your set methods.
i.e.
public void setAddress(Address newAddress) {
if (this.address != null) {
this.address.hashCode();
this.address = newAddress;
}

Java applet error when using proxy

I'm new with my project. I came in towards the end of R2.0 development and inherited an ongoing issue wherein the java applet throws a login exception error when proxy is used to connect. There's no issue when we do not use a proxy.
Per my knowledge, R2.0 involves an upgrade from an older weblogic v(8.1?) to 10.3. We did not have this problem with the old version.
Based on the java logs, the error below appears after the "set-cookie" step, which i noticed creates a new JSESSIONID
java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 400 for URL: .....
+....+
+....+
+....+
Login Exception. Please see your System Administrator.
I have already checked our proxy configurations and they do not have anything whitelisted (which would somehow explain why the old version worked, although nothing in the IP changed which should prevent the new app from working today) nor blacklisted (which would prevent the application from working today).
I am suspecting it's from the cookie, or from the upgrade. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the code because it's being developed by a third-party vendor.
Can someone suggest what to check to resolve this issue?
In case the information I've provided is insufficient, please let me know what else is needed that will help shed some light on this matter.

wrong forum. your question has nothing to do with WebLogic JDBC

Passivation/activation trouble when using proxy DB authentication

Hello,
I have an application module which uses database proxy authentication. A user authenticates with his own login/password and AppModuleImpl.java implements following methods: https://blogs.oracle.com/imc/entry/how_to_use_database_proxy .
It works fine, but there's a trouble with passivation/activation.
When passivation/activation happens, a user recieves another application module instance from server pool, which was authenticated by another user - and so an application shows another user data.
Could someone please advise me how to cope with this trouble?
Thanks.
ADF 11.1.2.1

Yes see the second comment in the blog.
"(jbo.doconnectionpooling=false and release mode=Stateful)" is not the default setting for a fusion web application... so override the prepareSession-method and set the proxyuser in this method.
Martin

Bad audio when using proxy media

I'm using FCPX on my MBP 15" late 2008. To get some reasonable speed I transcode all the clips to proxy media.
Doing this degrades audio quality to a point where the audio makes a clicking noise all the time.
Also when I add a sound effect and edit it in surround with keyframe animation the sound makes clicking noise all the time.
This noise is present when I export the movie.
What to do?

Trying that now
The odd thing is that the audio is fine when I play using optimized/original media. The audio gets crappy when I switch to proxy media.
I also get sort of the same problem when I'm using sound effects and choose "Create Space" or "Circle" under Audio inspector. These sound effects should be in the correct format since they came with FCPX.

No application registered for the message - when using Proxy !

I am using ABAP Proxy to sent my messages from legacy to SAP R3. All my settings seem to be okie. But I get this message and the error log says
'The application that implements the inbound interface could not be called. The error is not specific to the configuration.
The error ID DYNAMIC_CALL_FAILURE can refer to an error in the application. The error may be due to conversion errors that have not be caught in the application.'
Any clues on what could be wrong.
I have tried Debugging the Proxy but the breakpoint thta I set does not seem to get executed. I know how to Debugg the proxy and have done it before. But I have no clue on what is happening !

Hi Manish,
Check the inbound interface you have specified in Configuration.Is the same interface is specified in inbound proxy i.e have you genrated your proxy for the same interface.
Hope it helps
Thanx.
Rekha

How to set username and password when using Proxy class for SOCKS5?

Hi all,
I use the proxy class for SOCKS5, so need to set username and password, I don't find where can I set the value. whether the API support it.
Thanks in advance!

System.getProperties().put("proxySet", "true");That does nothing. Remove.
System.getProperties().put("proxyHost", getProxyHost());
System.getProperties().put("proxyPort", getProxyPort());You should be setting socks.proxyHost and socks.proxyPort here.
System.setProperty("java.net.socks.username", getSOCKSUsername());
System.setProperty("java.net.socks.password", getSOCKSPassword());
Authenticator.setDefault(new ProxyAuth(getSOCKSUsername(), getSOCKSPassword()));You either need the first two lines or the third, not both. See the last link posted above.
1. After I set the value, I connect internet by proxy, how the proxy server knows the values?Because Java tells it during the SOCKS handshake.
2. In my app, I just set the values in the system properties, then JVM does remaining work? Remaining work is not concerned?Should be OK unless you have to connect to a different SOCKS proxy from the same JVM, but that kind of thing is problematic anyway due to the curious Authenticator design which is set globally, not per connection as you might expect.

How to maintain messageId when using proxy services and mq??

Hi
I am a novice to oracle service bus and trying few transformations by configuring proxy services.
Let me explain the problem I'm facing:
I have created a business service and a proxy service and configured them in a synchronous way.
I'm using MQ as a transport protocol....and message I'm passing and transforming is in xml format.
these proxy and business services are functioning properly.....but at the another end i have created another pair of busines and proxy service which will be taking request message from earlier business service and putting it into another queue which is reference as a response queue by earlier proxy service.
my second pair is also working properly. now the problem is that it is not maintaining message Id during all the routing.
and that's why im not able to read the response message from the response queue because of message ID mismatch.
Please help!!
tell me if i have to do change any particular configuration settings to maintain the message id for my request message throughout the flow.
Thanks
Edited by: ChetakCs on Jun 14, 2010 7:19 AM

Post this in OSB forum:
SOA Suite

Strange behaviour when using connection pooling with proxy authentication

All
I have developed an ASP.NET 1.1 Web application that uses ODP.NET 9.2.0.4 accessing Oracle Database 8i (which is to be upgraded to 10g in the coming months). I have enabled connection pooling and implemented proxy authentication.
I am observing a strange behaviour in the live environment. If two users (User 1 and User 2) are executing SQL statements at the same time (concurrent threads in IIS), the following is occurring:
* User 1 opens a new connection, executes a SELECT statement, and closes this connection. The audit log, which uses the USER function, shows User 1 executed this statement.
* User 2 opens the same connection (before it is released to the connection pool?), excutes an INSERT statement, and closes this connection. The audit log shows User 1, not User 2, executed this statement.
Is this a known issue when using connection pooling with proxy authentication? I appreciate your help.
Regards,
Chris

Hi Chris,
I tried to reproduce your complaint, but was unable to. I didnt use auditting however, just a series of "select user from dual" with proxy authentication. You might want to see if you can put together a small complete testcase for this and open a sr with support.
Cheers
Greg

After Effects - Multiprocessing not allowed even when a Proxy is used?

Hi everybody!
 I have a composition (Comp1) that uses an effect which doesn't allow multiprocessing (e.g., Lens Blur) -- this I understand.
 Comp1 is used inside of Comp2. When I pre-render Comp1 and use that render as a proxy for Comp1 inside of Comp2, I still can't use multiprocessing. This is the confusing bit. I'd think since the Lens Blur effect isn't actually being rendered, it shouldn't give me any guff.
 Alas, it does. Anyone else run into this? Is there a workaround, or is it a bug/oversight by our friends at Adobe?
 Thanks in advance as always -- this forum is a great resource!

Hi Dave,
I appreciate your help, but I think I'm still missing something. When I set a proxy movie for my Comp1, come render time, it should never look inside Comp1 at all — it should just use the proxy movie. The LensBlur effect is not applied to Comp1 itself, it's used INSIDE Comp1.
To what end would AE look inside the real Comp1 when it's been assigned a proxy movie?
--Rob
Rob LaRose systems administrator
imaginary forces | 530 west 25th st | new york city | p 646.486.6868 | f 646.486.4700 | www.imaginaryforces.com
From: Dave LaRonde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:20:44 -0400
To: Rob LaRose <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: After Effects - Multiprocessing not allowed even when a Proxy is used?
Typically, a proxy is a low-resolution substitute for the real image to make AE work a little faster, right? When AE renders, it doesn't render the proxy, it uses the high-resolution real image, right? The same thing is happening in your project.
If it doesn't impact your work to use a lower-resolution substitute for your comp 1, I'd suggest not using the substitute as a proxy.
If full resolution matters, make a full-resolution prerender.

PI is slow when using Sender Proxy.

Hi,
We configured Proxy to PI to JDBC, interface is working fine when getiing around 10,000 records. We are facing problems when there are 40000 to 50000 records. Cant PI handle these many records.
PI is going very slow and and nearly taking 2-3 hrs for processing records to target system.
What was the reason and please let me know how to achieve this process.
Thnaking you,
Hari

Hi Hari,
First of all using proxy the performance will be good than using adapters. So basically the issue is not with the proxies. It may be the peoblem with the configuration and the process which you are following.
If you are getting data from multiple interface which means that multiple applications. If you are inserting all the inerfaces data into same table better you can use stored procedure instead of standard functionality . If you are using this stored procedure the execution will be happen at database side. In this case it will not take much time to process the records to database.
Regards,
Raju

CSA control of IE communication when using a proxy ?

Has anyone tried to do a network access control rule for IE communication when using a Proxy server in IE ? How would CSA know what sites are visited by ip if all comms are to the proxy server ?

I found that after Firefox v29, a LOT of my settings and 
add-ons were changed / reset. Try this;
'''''[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/troubleshoot-firefox-issues-using-safe-mode Start Firefox in Safe Mode]'''''
 While you are in safe mode; 
'''''Firefox Options > Advanced > General'''''. 
Look for and turn off '''Use Hardware Acceleration'''. 
Then check ALL of your settings. Browser and add-ons. Then restart.

Firefox leaking DNS queries when using a proxy

When configuring firefox to use a PAC file for proxy configuration, or when using the "system proxy settings" option, firefox queries the internal DNS server for every request, instead of using the proxy. I've see other "bugs" people have mentioned when using a socks proxy that sound similar, but this happens with just a regular proxy in my example (over port 8080)

Hi,
Which edition of windows server you are running?
You can point your clients to proxy server via GPO or GPP:
For previous version:
userconfig->policy->
windows
settings->
internet
explore
maintence
And the later version:
user
config->preference->control panel settings->internet settings->new
Appendix B: Replacements for Internet Explorer Maintenance
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj890998.aspx
Hope this helps.

OWA isue when using proxy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for