Owner information from Device ID when creating provisioning profile

Hi,
Is it possible to get information about the owner of the iPhone whose Device ID is added while creating provisioning profile for ad-hoc distribution?
All the best,
Saad

I don't think so... if it's possible I doubt it's easy.... but you can give each device any name you want in your profile (rather than the name of their iPhone or iPod, which can be pretty random)
So when I enter them here, I use the person's name as my identifier in the provisioning profile (post-its can do wonders if you have a whole pile of phones to enter)... that way you can easily tell whose phones you've already set up and whose you have not....

Similar Messages

HT5787 My apple id has been hacked. hacker has changed all information in the apple id so I can not change the password. Account information from the apple id created is still in my mail. How do I regain apple id. Thanks

My apple id has been hacked. hacker has changed all information in the apple id so I can not change the password. Account information from the apple id created is still in my mail. How do I regain apple id. Thanks

Contact Apple support: Apple ID: Contacting Apple for help with Apple ID account security

Fault information from bpel process when exception happens

How to extract all the fault information from bpel process when exception happens?
Are there any other methods other than "ora:getFaultName(), ora:getFaultAsString()"
When I use "ora:getFaultName(), ora:getFaultAsString()", I get the below message,so I am wondering whether
I can get any more information about the exception as mentioned below - "detailed root cause described in the exception message" -> how do I get it?
Check the detailed root cause described in the exception message text and verify that the XPath query is correct.

Hi,
As far as I know, it's not possible to get the exception message with a catch all. You need to catch each exception separately, and the you will be able to get each message.
Regards
Gustavo

Hi we have apple credentials for downloading OS and creating Provisioning profiles. Now we are trying to upgrade the Mac OS 10.7.3 version. do we need should buy this version from appStore. or can it be download from the apple site for free? Many thanks

Hi we have apple credentials for downloading OS and creating Provisioning profiles. Now we are trying to upgrade the Mac OS 10.7.3 version. do we need should buy this version from appStore. or can it be download from the apple site for free? Many thanks in advance!

Whether you need to buy Mac OS X 10.7.3 depends on what version of OS X you have now.
If you have OS X 10.6.x or lower it is a paid upgrade from the Mac AppStore.
If you have OS X 10.7.x it is a free upgrade you get using Software Update on your Mac.

When getting information from SLD, should SMSY create a system for EP?

I've connected my EP NW2004s system ES3 to the SLD. I connected Solution Manager 4.0 to SLD so that SMSY can get information from the SLD. When I run the import, I see:
1. ES3's server sapeps03 created under SMSY Landscape Component ->Server.
2. ES3 's database ES3 created under SMSY Landscape Component-> Database.
3. ES3 Java component entry created under SMSY Landscape Component->System Components->Java System.
BUT, I don't see an ES3 entry under SMSY Landscape Component->Systems->SAP Netweaver. Shouldn't there be? Do I have to create this manually?
The ECC 5.0 system RS3 got created under SMSY Landscape Component->Systems->SAP ECC. Why not the EP system?
Thanks.
Regards,
Mel Calucin

Hello Mel,
the SMSY transaction had a lot of issues resolving the appropriate Java product with older versions of Solution Manager. For instance, you can take a look at the SAP Note 1392992.
Newer versions of Solution Manager (currently on SP24) resolve most of the issues. The portal is certainly detected successfully.
My recommendation would be having Solution Manager updated always with the latest Support Package stack available.
All the best,
Andreu

Assign account from Service Request when creating a New Task

When creating a new task from within a Service Request the SR # is defaulted we would also like to default the account associated with the SR on to the Task. How can you do this?

This is not working in WF.
Refer this thread
Re: Contact record not pupulated when Task created using Workflow.

How do I 'remove' a dimension from a cube when creating a crosstab?

I have a CUBE with 9 dimensions and one measure, This is based of a fact table that has a Materialized View with just 4 dimensions.
In JDeveloper I used the wizard to create a new crosstab using just the four dimensions that exist in the MV (removing the others).
....eventually the page was generated but it takes minutes....
Q. Is there a way to 'DROP' a dimension from JDeveloper crosstab when you query a CUBE?
[It looks like Oracle is internally using all 9 dimensions when some are "Hidden" or not required!]
The only solution I have found is to create an extra CUBE using just the 4 dimensions (this works within couple of seconds)! But I will end up with 6 CUBES holding different dimensions combination, this feels wrong?
Q2. Is it bad practice to have multiple CUBES all based on one fact table, just to improve performace?
I hope you can help.
Steve

i think this question is more for the technical teams at the olap forum ;)
nevertheless: if you have a cube defined with 9 dimensions,all of them are necessary for retrieving the data, "hiding" some of them is possible by the means of "hidden dimensions"
nevertheless you have to specify which dimension, value gets substitued for those dimensions: usually it is a TOTAL level.
otherwise your results may be misleading or wrong, so specifying a dimension value for those hidden dimensions is the only choice to be consistent with the OLAP data model
btw: you can easily use a materialized view in this environment as well, when using the concept of a TOTAL dimension value
regards,
thomas

How to derive the notification id from APEXP WF when creating Expanse report in 11i

Hi,
I am new to WF, I need to derive the notification id when creating AP Expanse report, I can achieve this by creating trigger on WF_NOTIFICATIONS table, but I need to derive this by creating custom procedure and that procedure need to be called from WF node. Here I am not getting when this notification id getting creating into WF_NOTIFICATION table.
I have created custom procedure as below and calling this procedure from WF node.
PROCEDURE insert_notif_details( p_item_type    IN VARCHAR2,
                                p_item_key    IN VARCHAR2,
                                p_actid        IN NUMBER,
                                p_funmode    IN VARCHAR2,
                                p_result     OUT NOCOPY VARCHAR2) IS
BEGIN
        lv_report_header_id := p_item_key;
        l_notificationID    := wf_engine.context_nid;
        BEGIN
                 WHILE (l_notificationID IS NULL)
                 LOOP
                    DBMS_LOCK.sleep(1);
                    BEGIN
                     SELECT notification_id
                       INTO l_notificationID
                       FROM apps.wf_notifications
                      WHERE item_key = TO_CHAR(lv_report_header_id)
                        AND notification_id =(SELECT MAX(notification_id)
                                                FROM apps.wf_notifications
                                               WHERE item_key = TO_CHAR(lv_report_header_id));
                    EXCEPTION
                      WHEN no_data_found THEN
                           l_notificationID := NULL;
                           l_error_message := SQLERRM;
                      WHEN others THEN
                           l_notificationID := NULL;
                           l_error_message := SQLERRM;
                   END;
                 END LOOP;
        END;

Hi,
I'm not sure I'm reading your requirements correctly - do you want the process to move on as soon as anyone responds to it, or move on once everyone has responded to it?
In the first case, it sounds like what you really need is a notification activity, which requires a response, sent to the role (or create an adhoc role which is assigned to everyone assigned to role 1 and role 2). As soon as one person responds to it, the notification is closed and the process moves on.
In the second case, you should do the same but expand the roles. You will then need to write a post notification function to tally the votes and determine when to move on - have a look at the standard voting activity for an example of how to do it.
HTH,
Matt
WorkflowFAQ.com - the ONLY independent resource for Oracle Workflow development
Alpha review chapters from my book "Developing With Oracle Workflow" are available via my website http://www.workflowfaq.com
Have you read the blog at http://thoughts.workflowfaq.com ?
WorkflowFAQ support forum: http://forum.workflowfaq.com

Strange messages from SAP GTS when creating purchase orders (POs)

Hello gurus,
we use SAP GTS to check against sanctioned party lists (SPLs) only. We already transferred all our master data to GTS and our partners were checked okay. Now we just activated the document check in our test system. The system produces two different messages we do not quite understand:
1. When creating a purchase order with an item without material master, the system gives the message:
Legal Control: Custs Prod. Mast. Required
Material
Obviously GTS tries to find a matching material master, which naturally fails. My question is: Can I disable this check somewhere? In our case it is not important what the material is, we just want to check if our vendor is on some SPL.
2. In some POs there is the message
Legal Control: Partn. Function Mapping not Maintained
Partner Function: DA
I think I understand what the system is trying to say, but fact is, only one partner function is used in that order (VN). We do not even have a partner function u201CDAu201D in our ERPu2026
At least in the first case, the PO is not checked against the SPL by SAP GTS, which means we would not detect if we ordered from someone on the SPL. This is not acceptable.
Any ideas on any of those messages?
Thanks
Alicia

Hello again,
I found the solution myself:
1. see Re: Goods receipts into GTS are blocked
2. was a known problem solved by a patch (check OSS).
Thanks anyway
Alicia

Photo loss from a project when creating a smart album

Running Aperture 3.4.3 on iMac with OS X 10.7.5. Photos stored on internal drive. After creating two smart albums based on a date range, one with keywords and one with ratings, some, but not all, of the photos that appeared in the smart albums disappeared from the original projects (each project contains photos from a single day). One of the original projects still notes 454 photos under its thumbnail, but when opened only displays 308 photos. The project path of the photos in the smart album still references the correct project. I tried deleting the smart album but the photos did not immediately reappear in the correct project so I undid the delete. I tried closing and reopening Aperture. I tried system restart. No luck. Reading the Aperture help/manual suggests that the photos should remain in the original project.

First: Make sure the Browser Filter is set to "Showing All" (or "Unrated or Better") when the Project is selected.

Hide Excel from popping out when creating slide in PowerPoint

Hi, l have an application that will generate PowerPoint and create some chart within the PowerPoint.
i've been using Interop.Powerpoint.Slide.Shapes.AddChart() to create chart in PowerPoint. The momment this function is called, an Excel window will pop out for us to fill in the data. Is there any way to tell Excel window open
in minimize mode/behind other application instead of popping out and became the active window? Even if I doChart.ChartData.Workbook.Application.Visible = false, Excel window still shows up a little while. Some of the device the Excel
window will automatically open behind other application but some don't.

I guess open excel first in background won't work. When we call AddChart() method, an Excel will be pop out for us to fill in the data. By the way, the Excel will be close after a chart is created successfully and another new Excel Window will pop out again
if we call AddChart() method again.

Connection Pool Name Missing from Drop Down when Creating a New Datasource

Hi All,
I'm running Weblogic Server 8.1. I've successfully created a connection pool for DB2 using the Non-XA JDBC driver from IBM (Version 7.1). When I attempt to create a datasource for this pool and un-check the "Honor Global Transactions" checkbox, the connection pool is missing from the dropdown on the next page of the wizard. If I check the checkbox, the connection pool appears in the list.
I experience this behavior on one instance of Weblogic Server, but not on another (I can see the pool whether or not the check box is checked).
Is there some setting on the connection pool that could cause this behavior?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve

Steven Grant wrote:
Hi All,
I'm running Weblogic Server 8.1. I've successfully created a connection pool for DB2 using the Non-XA JDBC driver from IBM (Version 7.1). When I attempt to create a datasource for this pool and un-check the "Honor Global Transactions" checkbox, the connection pool is missing from the dropdown on the next page of the wizard. If I check the checkbox, the connection pool appears in the list.
I experience this behavior on one instance of Weblogic Server, but not on another (I can see the pool whether or not the check box is checked).
Is there some setting on the connection pool that could cause this behavior?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
SteveI can't reproduce this on 8.1sp5...
I would have you compare the JDBCConnectionPool entry
between the two instances.

Projects dropped from shared services when creating an essbase application

When we try to create an essbase application via EAS - there is an error message Unable to createExternalUser. then when we log in to shared services - there are no projects available.
This is for version 9.3.1.0

Hi Cameron,
many thanks for your answer.
Well let me explain a little bit further:
I created an own security module which manages the whole security in Essbase. I get the grants from a corporate system and then just apply them by some definitions natively in Essbase using filters etc.
To make sure the grants on the server are exactly the same as the grants that get delivered to me, I export the complete security in Essbase using MaxL and import it to a relational DB. I then check whether there are any grants which shouldn't be there and vice versa.
If now an admin user creates an application, he gets an additional application manager grant for this application. He does not loose his admin permissions.
Now in my check this application manager grant pops up as this grant is not in the corporate system but created Essbase internally when a application is created.
If I export the complete security this application manager grant is there.
I would like to get rid of these errors in my check. Also it makes no sense that an admin user gets an Application Manager grant because he already has that permission as an admin user.
I already searched the documentations but didn't find a setting to disable this behaviour of Essbase.
Btw. Essbase version is 11.1.1.3.
Maybe someone of you guys know if there is any chance to do this - if not, I have to find another solution.
Thanks and kind regards,
Thomas

Time Capsule disappears from device list when wireless is toggled

When I toggle wireless on and off, either via profile or Airport > Wireless, sometimes my base station disappears from the list of devices in Airport Utility:
Has anyone else seen this? My Time Capsule reappears after I close and reopen Airport Utility.

I may not be understanding what you mean but unless you have the TC connected via ethernet it will disappear when you turn airport off, it would come back up when you turn it on but it may take a few minutes.

Account Owner added to Opportunity Team when creating a new Opportunity

We´ve noticed that the Account Owner is added automatically to the Opportunity Team when we create a new Opportunity.
Is it possible to disable this behaviour ?
txs. for your help.
Antonio

Antonio, not at this time.

Owner information from Device ID when creating provisioning profile

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for