P.Req and PO

Dear All,
I have created a p.req using me51n but When I am trying to create PO from P.Req using ME59N its showing no suitable docs found.
Why?
thanks
Shuva

Hi,
During creation of PR , did you select check box of Source Determination in the 1st screen of ME51/ ME51N , please check.
For automatic PO creation from PR, follow the steps or check.
1) Material Master purchasing view tick automatic PO check box
2) Vendor Master purchasing view tick automatic PO check box.
3) Maintain Source list for Vendor & Material.(ME01)
4) Maintain Purchase Info Record.(ME11)
5) Create a Purchase Requisition.(ME51)
6) Use T.Code: ME59 & execute for PR for vendor, you will be able to create automatic PO.
Note:
For Service auto- PO, you need to activate Automatic Purchase order creation for Service requisitions in ML91. Create info record based on Material Group,For Automatic PO , info record is mandatory.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Trigger CIF during custom field change on Purchase Req. and PO

Hi,
We added a custom date field in Purchase Req. and Purchase Order transactions (ME52N/ME22N) in ECC. When this custom field gets changed along with any other standard field, outbound CIF process happens. However, when we change this custom field only, then outbound CIF doesn't happen. I believe we need change pointers and may be custom code to trigger outbound CIF. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to achieve this functionality.
Thanks.
Naveen

Hello Naveen,
Use user exit EXIT_SAPLMEAP_001 here, the structure CIFPUORCUS must be enhanced with custom fields so that the document date can be included (IT_OUTPUT_CUS).transferred to CT_MM_DOC. You need to fill EBAN and EKPO for change transfer. Also you can have the background job for RIMODINI to transfer the changes.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

How to avoid purchase req and stock transport order to take part in MRP.

Please suggest how to avoid purchase req and stock transport order to take part in MRP.

hi,
check the settings for the MRP type...there you need to show which doc will be taken into considerations...
SPRO >> MM >> CBP...
Under CBP check for the MRP settings where it is placed(check under master data settings)...and check for the indicator for PR's and STO's release orders under tab "Additional external req. in the reorder point planning"..
Regards
Priyanka.P

WS to RFC Scenario:: One RFC As Req and Other as Response

Hi Experts,
I am dealing with a scenario, WS to RFC, where I have to Use the request of one RFC as the resonse of the other RFC.
WS--> Req Of RFC1
RFC2 as Resp of RFC1-->WS
Please suggest how it can be accomplished?
T & R
Sushama

Hi Sushama,
Hope u r doing well!!!
As the scenario is SOAP to RFC, When you are dealing with this scenario you have RFC (Bapi) req and responce as well
In the IR part
we need to configure two message mappings
1) Soap sender to bapi request
2) Bapi response to soap receiver
In the interface mapping we need to assign two mapping one is req mapping and res mapping in mapping program we can get a tab after assigning a bapi
In the ID part
Soap adapter as sender (with mandatory parameter of MI and namespace)
RFC adapter as receiver (If RFC is a receiver, no need of configration from SAP side)
Receiver determination
Interface determination
Sender agreement
Receiver agreement
Hope this might help you... Dear Experts. pls correct me if i'm wrong
Thanks
Rajshekar

WSDL arrayType req and response

Hello Friends,
I have got a wsdl, which I need to consume for inbout syn interface.
The problem is wsdl req and response str contains elements with type arrayType.
I have imported and activated the wsdl, though wsdl is activated without error but fields are shown with red.
What I can do to fix this issue `?
Thanks and regards,

Hi Ali, could you test with this mapping:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:ProductsResponse xmlns:ns0="XXXXX">
 <ns0:Consolidado_De_ProductosResult> -
>*Estruct RFC**
 <ns0:PRODUCTS> // this type is Array -
> Map constant [] to---> PRODUCTS
 <ns0:PRODUCT> //this data type is 0..unbounded----
> Map to -
> PRODUCT
</ns0:ProductsResponse>
Regards!
Edited by: ecruz2010 on Nov 17, 2011 3:11 PM
Edited by: ecruz2010 on Nov 17, 2011 3:12 PM
Edited by: ecruz2010 on Nov 17, 2011 3:13 PM

PS report: wbs element relation with PO, Pur Req. and vendor

Hello,
I need to build a report on WBS element which also shows PO number, Pur. Requisition, vendor details along with budget, actual, committements.
I found datasources that can provide informations except PO, Pur Req.
Can anyone help in providing a soln to build a relation between wbs and vendor to bring the correct PO and pur req related to wbs.
Thanks
Anima

Hi Sushil,
Which version of BW are you using?
If its BW 7, then look at the datasource 2LIS_02_ACC
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/ed/62073c44564d59e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this help you
Anima

Purchase Req and PO questions in 11i

Hi,
I have few questions on Purchasing module, can any one plase provide your inputs, any help is highly apporeciated. i am using 11i
1. When we Auto create PO from a Req, The “Ship To” field does not automatically populate from the REQ. How can we Auto populate Shipt to of a REQ line shipt to PO? Is it Possible?
2. Oracle allows Requestors to submit a REQ for a supplier that is on Hold. Can We make tohave it not allow the REQ to be submitted and provide an error message?.
3. Oracle allows REQ’s to be submitted when missing required information such as “Ship To” and “Supplier Site” as these are not mandatory fields. How can we make these feilds mandatory under REQ screen?can we achieve through Form personalization?.
4. Inorder to Place a supplier on Payment Hold requires checking boxes on the main supplier setup and then on each site setup. Is there any way to we can do one step actions in the main supplier setup affect all existing and subsequent sites.
Thanks
Edited by: 890852 on Mar 6, 2012 7:18 AM

Thanks Sandeep for your inputs. I want to clarify further, please let me know if you could. I appreciate your help.
1. The shipto on the PO shipment defaults from the Requisition. However, the shipto on the PO header remains blank. The buyer has to fill it in manually.
This is correct, can we display what ever displayed under "shipto on the PO shipment" to "shipto on the PO header" , is it achieved only through Form personalization.
4. The payment hold box on supplier screen is used to default the same box when CREATING a new supplier site. Unless you write a customization, I don't know of any way to set the box on all sites when it is checked on the supplier screen.
If we check the "Hold all Payments" under Supplier form, it is not automatically defaulting under sites, but is it required to go manually each site and check the "Hold all Payments"?, I think once we check the "Hold all Payments" under Supplier form it would logically apply for all of its sites as well right, though we dont check under sites?
Thanks

Passing Custom fields to Req and PO

Hi,
We are on SRM 5.0 and ECC 5.0.We are using the classic scenario .I am trying to transfer the catalog ID from SRM shopping cart to R3 Req .There are number of threads in this forum that describe the procedure, which i understand.
But now if the Req is converted to PO in R3 either manually or auto, does the custom fields also get transferred automatically ,if i maintain the same custom fields in CI_EKPODB & CI_EKPODBX? or is there anything else i need to do.
Thanks
Raghu

Hi
Besides BBP_CUFMAP, you have to of course :
- create the same Zdata element datain ECC as you have done it in SRM.
- maintain CI_EKPODB with append of your Zdata element
- create CI_EKPODBX and activate it !
Then you will be able to sea your Zdata element (or CUF) in the EKPO table.
You don't need to use BBP_PO_INBOUND !
Re: Update Custom Fields in PO - BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI
Re: Mapping fields in SRM with R/3
Also, Please refer to SAP OSS Notes 672960 and 485891.
The BADIs in SRM which can used in this case, using transaction SE18 are 
BBP_TARGET_OBJECTS
BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE
In SRM Customization
In the following step : " Go to SRM --> SRM Server --> Cross Application Settings --> Define Objects in Backend System --> go to external procurement and select the function from the drop down box", it says "purchase order if item data is complete, otherwise Purchase Requsition.
Related links for source code and other configuration ->
R3 field is not populated????
implementation of BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM. and BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI
Custom field values are not being transfered to the backend system
Re: custom field values not passed to R/3
Do let me know, incase you face any issues.
Regards
- Atul

How do u segrigate cross client req. and client specific req.?

How can I find out which one is Cross client transport and client specific transport req.?

Hi tjk
In SPRO, do the following:
Menu: Additional Information->Technical Data->Client Dependence
Then all IMG nodes will have the client specific/client independent information visible.
Also:
Normally, when you try to open an IMG node of cross-client, then system gives a warning message.
Best regards
Ramki

Scheduling problem with delivery date in purch.req and requirement date

Dear all,
I have the problem, that the calculated delivery date in the purchase requisition does not correspond with the requiement date of the production or planned order.
I would like to use planned delivery times in the material master.
Example:
Planned delivery time: 20 days
Todays date 01.10
Case 1)
Requiement date of planned order 10.10
Case 2)
Requiement date of planned order 20.09
This situation can happen in our envirnoment, as the engineering process still continues after start of production. In this case I would like to have the following result:
Case 1)
Delivery date is 10.10 minus the goods receipt time
Case 2)
Delivery date is day of MRP or one or two days more
I made the setting that dates in the past are not allowed. This solves my first smal problem. I tried to set the scheduling margin key but these settings do not help me, as they are relevant for all materials. I need of course individual planned delivery dates per material.
So, I want to change the standart MRP procedure that in the case of the "wished requirement date" not the calculated date is beeing taken, but the "wished date". Usually you receive an exeption for this case and you would need t solve this manually. But this we dont want to do.
Can s.o. please help me? Thank you all very much, I really dont know what to do in this case.
With best regards,
Bjoern

The question cannot be answerd by SAP standart as I see. We will go through a workaround.

Price differece between purchase req and PO for free text purchase

Hi there
Has anyone found a good solution for the following problem.
A free text purchase requisition item is created with a value = x. The buyer goes out to quote (not using SAP RFQ - manual) and comes back with a price change. The buyer creates the purchase order referencing the purchase requisition, but they need to change the value to x+10.
The client wants to stop the purchase order been created if the value is above a certain percentage. The standard settings in the system are for material values. Does anyone know how to extend this to a short text item on a purchase requistion?
Thanks
Roz

Hi,
This is not possible to achieve in SAP standard functionality.
You can do one thing, keep Price field for the PO Document type of Text Purchases as display, which will not allow user to change the price for Text POs.
Use Release Strategy for Purchase Requisitions and keep changeability for the Release indicator as "4" and % Changeability as 10%. And ask user ro change the price in ME52N only instead of changing it in PO. If it will increase more than 10% the PR Value then system will reset the release and this PR needs to be released again.
If it is not acceptable then you can try it with user exit "MM06E007" - Change document for requisitions upon conversion into PO

Purchase Req and Goods Receipt (ESS) question

Hi,
My client has ECC 6 and EP 7 in the landscape. I am implementing Employee Self Service portal. It looks like standard Purchasing Requisition and Goods Receipts iviews (ESS package) are pointing to SRM. We are not implementing SRM here. Is there any way I can use these iviews pointing to ECC (probably ME51n, MIGO?)?
Do I have to have SRM in order to use these standard iviews? Is there any standard iviews available for ECC purchase requisition?
If you implement Purchase Requisition using ECC instead of SRM, what is the licensing impact? Client has purchased the license for Employee Procurement Self Service.
Another question is, Is there any standard iview for Travel & Expense approval? I dont find it in MSS.
Thanks,
Umesh Garg

HI Horny,
Can you use the Following Tables:
S039 - > LETZTABG - Date: last (i.e. most recent) goods issue
EKPO -> EBELN - Purchasing Document Number.
You can create View by using these two tables (Material Number is the Common) and uploade the data.
Hope this will be helpful for your question.
Thanks
Rajesh
Message was edited by:
rajesh

Purchase Req and Goods Receipt

My client has ECC 6 and EP 7 in the landscape. I am implementing Employee Self Service portal. It looks like standard Purchasing Requisition and Goods Receipts iviews (ESS package) are pointing to SRM. We are not implementing SRM here. Is there any way I can use these iviews pointing to ECC (probably ME51n, MIGO?)?
Do I have to have SRM in order to use these standard iviews? Is there any standard iviews available for ECC purchase requisition?
If you implement Purchase Requisition using ECC instead of SRM, what is the licensing impact? Client has purchased the license for Employee Procurement Self Service.
Another question is, Is there any standard iview for Travel & Expense approval? I dont find it in MSS.

ok

Downpayment req and downpayment made account

hi,
1) downpayment request is alternative recon account? its payable or receivable?
2) i notice when there is an entry in downpayment request and downpayment made account, there will be a same entry in vendor account. for example, when DR downpayment made account, there will be a DR 29A in vendor account. why?
what i know is
DR downpayment account
CR bank
why there is another entry DR 29A in vendor account? this entry will be offset when process downpayment clearing takes place by CR 39A vendor account.
but for downpayment request, 39F will be in cr side of vendor account. no clearing for this.
so MY QUESTION is why there is a same side entry in vendor account when there is an entry made to downpayment made account or downpayment request account.
thanks

> hi,
> 1) downpayment request is alternative recon account?
> its payable or receivable?
It is applicable to both.
As per the accounting standards u need to classify any advance payment received or paid has to be disclosed separately.
> 2) i notice when there is an entry in downpayment
> request and downpayment made account, there will be
> a same entry in vendor account. for example, when DR
> downpayment made account, there will be a DR 29A in
> vendor account. why?
> what i know is
> DR downpayment account
> CR bank
> why there is another entry DR 29A in vendor account?
> this entry will be offset when process downpayment
> clearing takes place by CR 39A vendor account.
> but for downpayment request, 39F will be in cr side
> of vendor account. no clearing for this.
> so MY QUESTION is why there is a same side entry in
> vendor account when there is an entry made to
> downpayment made account or downpayment request
> account.
No when u are choosing the special GL indicator for ur down payment it suffixes with the posting key. That is why u see 29A
To have better understanding go through the following IMG settings
OBXY
OBXT
OBXS> thanks
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/41/37b8e7455b11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm

Sub req and MD04 (very urgent)

Hi Experts,
I am new to MM.
I have created a PO for mat ABC with item category "L" i.e. subcontracting.The required delivery date in the PO is 03.07.2007 and the component for that material is XYZ.
The planned delivery time and the GR processing time for the main material is 30 and 1 respectively.
The planned delivery time and the GR processing time for the component is 7 and 1 respectively.
When I am going to the MD04 screen I could see an entry with MRP element "SUBREQ" on date 29.05.2007.
According to my client it should be 03.06.3007.Why the system is considering the the planned time and gr time for component as there is already stock available at vendor location.
Could you please help?
Regards
Karan

Problem solved

Req and PO Make Order Mandatory Based on Acct Assignement Catagory

Is there a way to make the field order on the account assignment tab mandatory based upon which account assignment catagory is selected? For account assignment catagory "F" we need order mandatory all others not mandatory.
Thanks

Hi,
Check following path:
SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account assignment>Maintain acct assignment catg>
Select F and go to details.
Change field label CO/PP order from optional to mandatory entry.
Regards,
Pratap

P.Req and PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for