P1505 "Status: Manual Feed Required."

I installed a P1505 on a Vista laptop via USB last week, and it worked fine. Today, the user called me and said that after she'd turned her printer on (which she claimed she hadn't turned off?) this morning, she printed one document, and it began saying "Manual Feed Required" and refuses to print anything else. I am at a loss, there don't seem to be any troubleshooting docs which refer to this error, googling brings up references to using the printer on a print server which is no help to me, and reinstalling the printer software drivers etc seems to have not done anything.
Message Edited by coyo7e on 07-13-2009 11:01 AM

Test reply by James Ugrin - never used the forum before and want to see if I get an email.

Similar Messages

Alert 7055 - Manual Approval Required, XML messages to ECC not Triggered.

Hi All,
I have a behavior in our Client Production System.
We have setup a process in which if a PO confirmation Dates are -5 / + 5 days appart then that line item should result in Manual Approval Required.
Even though a PO line item is in Status "Manual Approval Required" a XML message is triggered and a AB confirmation gets created in ECC.
Issue we faced:- even if the Confirmation Dates are within range still the PO was ending up in Manual Approval specially if vendor enters multiple Schedule lines for the same PO line item with Dates with in +/- 5 days.
In our Test system , we implemented notes given by SAP to fix the above issue the issue looks fixed but,
Now the behavior is if the line item is having Status "Manual Approval Required", NO XML messages are getting triggered for a PO with Confirmation date beyond +/- 5 days. Once the the approval is given and Schedule line is Adopted the XML is getting triggered correctly.
I want to know from all the Experts on to understand which behavior is correct is Production correct(excluding the Bug) or the Test systems not triggering XML unless the Manual Approval is given.
I did read SAP help but i am not understanding since SAP mentions both behavior not Clear when such behavior should occur.
Please help to understand thsi behavior.
Please advise.
Thx
MJ

Hi MJ,
The behaviour in your Test system is correct.
When there is Manual approval is required which means deviation from requested which first needs to be accepted by customer in SNC.
If Purchase order item status is Manual approval required and XML's are getting trigger which updates ECC with AB-confirmation then customer will assume PO is confirmed without deviation until he/she compares requested schedule line and confirmed schedule line.
SAP standard behaviour is also same as your Test system behaviour see the help link(In process point#6)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_snc70/helpdata/EN/48/1010953b2b3558e10000000a42189d/content.htm
Regards,
Nikhil

CP 2025 Duplex Printing Requires Manual Feed

Just got this printer and when I print double sided, it flashes yellow and requires me to feed a sheet of paper into the manual feed, which ends up being a cover page. Page 2 of the document is placed on a second sheet of paper and the remaining pages print fine. Very irritating to have to feed a sheet for each print job.
Please help,

ToniE wrote:
HP again, may-be this time with their great Buddy in war Mircosoft.... Installed windows 7 prof (32bit) and then installed the c7280 as a network printer (like one does that in Microsoft).... BIGGG SURPRISE... printer found, workx. EXCEPT: to make sure that as of Windows 7 and further nobody can complain about pop-ups which say that you can't duplex and if you say print anyway it works, this driver has just taken "automatic" out of the selections of duplexing!!!
A simple solution: go to the printers folder, right click on the C7280, Printer Properties, Device Settings and set the duplex unit to "installed", OK.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

M375nw manual feed

My M375nw printer got jolted while moving it. Not hard, but enough to shake it. The only problem is it won't manually feed from tray 1. It reports a jam in tray 2, clear and press OK. There is no jam, and the message keeps repeating. If I take paper out of tray 1, it immediately prints from tray 2. I'm guessing something got shaken loose or out of alignment. I've tried reseating the green guide a few times. Anyone have any ideas? Only listed HP repair anywhere near me won't work with me, they only work under contract with large companies.

The paper output selector can be puzzling, and some of these printers have the actuating lever broken off. If you stare at the back (opposite of the paper cassette end) you will see two page-shaped Icons embossed into the right end of the Outside of the flip-down back panel. One has a page with no writing (indicating face-down delivery into the tray on top) the other has a page with writing (indicating face up delivery onto the table behind the printer).
The beige select lever, if still present, protrudes about an inch into space next to those Icons. The slot across most of the back panel has a slight notch at the right end where the lever should be. If the lever is present, the solution is obvious -- flip it to the position corresponding to the delivery Icon you prefer.
If the lever is broken off, more work is required. Flip down the door and you will see that a black plastic piece, attached to the flip-down door, extends the full length of the slot. This is the part that actually deflects the page into the top or out the back. It is very easy to re-position with slight finger pressure, and snaps into one of two positions. Lever Up = deflector down and in = face down delivery on top. Lever down = deflector up and out = face up delivery on the table behind.

Manual feed - Pers. LW 320

Can someone tell me how to use the manual feed on the Personal LaserWriter 320?
I want to print on some small size (10x7") card stock.
Thank you.

The paper output selector can be puzzling, and some of these printers have the actuating lever broken off. If you stare at the back (opposite of the paper cassette end) you will see two page-shaped Icons embossed into the right end of the Outside of the flip-down back panel. One has a page with no writing (indicating face-down delivery into the tray on top) the other has a page with writing (indicating face up delivery onto the table behind the printer).
The beige select lever, if still present, protrudes about an inch into space next to those Icons. The slot across most of the back panel has a slight notch at the right end where the lever should be. If the lever is present, the solution is obvious -- flip it to the position corresponding to the delivery Icon you prefer.
If the lever is broken off, more work is required. Flip down the door and you will see that a black plastic piece, attached to the flip-down door, extends the full length of the slot. This is the part that actually deflects the page into the top or out the back. It is very easy to re-position with slight finger pressure, and snaps into one of two positions. Lever Up = deflector down and in = face down delivery on top. Lever down = deflector up and out = face up delivery on the table behind.

Phaser 3320 Manual Feed

I have a problem with the phaser 3320, the users have plain white in the tray but they also require to print on special paper using the manual feed. I have enabled bypass mode on the web page but when they put paper into the manual feed it still only uses the tray, the only way around this at the moment is to remove the tray or empty it. I thought it should detect any paper in the manual feed then use that first??

The webpage and driver are not linked in any way. The webpage is for jobs submitted on the webpage.The driver will always print to the regular tray and the bypass is used when the job is programmed for what is in it, which typically is something abnormal to plain white Letter. So if you were to set the driver to print on "labels" and the printer bypass tray is loaded with Labels (Programmed as such) then the Auto select would work in the driver as long as Labels was set.

Print a document with mixed Legal/Letter paper with 1 tray and manual feed

I have an HP Laserjet Pro MFP M521 with one paper tray. I need to print a document that has a mix of legal and letter size pages. Is there a way to set it up using the one tray and the manual feed so that it will print correctly?

hello, please don't open new questions for the same topic, but keep all your answers in your original thread at [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/985876]! this will make it easier for contributors to provide effective help.
thank you!

How to turn off Manual Feed envelope prompt on printer scrn LaserJet Pro 200 Color MFP M276?

Somehow, in trying to figure out how to get an envelope to print from the feeder tray (which I found out isn't possible), I turned on something that produces a printer screen prompt that says something like 'Manual Feed" then says the size of envelope and waits for response. This is every time I print an envelope & it's really a pain and I'm not finding where/how to turn this off. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance.

Hello miebs, and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
I see you are having envelope issues. I would love to try and help you, but I do need a little information first. I am linking a few HP Support documents below that will show you how to find which operating system you are using. Also, if you're using Windows, please include whether your operating system is 32-bit or 64-bit. With this information we can provide you with accurate information.
Mac OS X: How Do I Find Which Mac OS X Version Is on My Computer?
Which Windows operating system am I running?
Is the Windows Version on My Computer 32-bit or 64-bit?
Also, What programs are you printing from? Does it occur from multiple programs?
Please let me know what you find. Thanks for posting on the HP Forums!
Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
Jamieson
I work on behalf of HP
"Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

HP LaserJet 4200 -- manual feed tray not working after 10.6 install

Hi all...
One of my users pointed this out to me. I'm looking for confirmation (or a solution)?
We have an HP LaserJet 4200 printer added to our mac clients as an IP printer. Under 10.5.8, printing to "Tray 1 (Manual)" goes where you think it would -- to the manual feed tray.
Upgrading to 10.6.1? Manual print jobs are going to the internal "Tray 3".
It's the same behavior if I use the 10.6.1 "5.3.0" printer driver or the HP Printer Update 2.1 updated "5.4.0" version.
Can anybody else confirm/deny the problem with their 4200 printer under 10.6? If you can confirm it, do you know of a fix (short of rolling back to 10.5.8).
A remove and readd of the printer did not help here. Unfortunately.
Thanks!
- Steve

Resolved this two ways:
1) the "gutenprint" driver worked.
2) The larger problem was the manual tray had been set to "A4" size.
I used the web admin interface to set this to "any size" and "any" type and that fixed the problem with the 5.4.0 "LaserJet 4200 Series" default printer driver...
Luckily, somebody else on campus had one of these printers and we were able to compare the printer setting differences to figure this out.
I hope this helps somebody!
- Steve

LaserJet 4700dn Always prints from Tray 1 (Manual Feed)

I have a networked LaserJet 4700dn in a lab environment that recently has starting trying to print all jobs on the manual feed Tray 1. I cannot find a way to reset this to use Tray 2 as the default tray. I have checked all the OSD settings and used the web interface to attempt to rectify this. I have installed the latest firmware and driver package on my test computer with no luck. I have read threads here for different printer models with the same issue but the solutions given are not available for the 4700 printer.
TIA

The problem for me was that the paper tray setting slipped back from LTR to A4. Take out the paper tray and make sure the arrow is aligned with LTR.

Error: SNAP_ADT does not exist in the database - manual check required

Hello Friends,
We are performing an upgrade+migration to HDB using the DMO option(Oracle to HANA).
We are getting below error in the phase MAIN_SHDCRE/SUBMOD_SHDDBCLONE/DBCLONE!
Also find the output of SE11 & SE14 attached.
SE14->
Please help us with the manual check.
Regards
Sury

Hi Sury,
In regards to the error below:
1EETGCLN Error: SNAP_ADT does not exist in the database -> manual check
required
1EETGCLN SNAP_ADT
1EETGCLN Table does not exist
Could you please try to activate the following tables via SE11?
- SNAP_ADT
Once they are activated, Could you please repeat the phase and update the result?
Thanks and Regards,
James Wong
Follow us:
SAP System Upgrade & Update Troubleshooting Wiki Space.
SAP Product Support Twitter ( Hashtag: #NWUPGRADE)

Custom size manual feed?

Why do envelopes default to a manual feed, but custom sizes pull from the main paper tray? Can you change which feed type the custom size defaults to?
I have a Lexmark E234n mono laser printer which works just fine. I like to print odd sized stuff, though, like bank deposit slips, envelopes and index cards. Usually, I call up a #10 envelope in Page Setup, and format my page to stay within the actual paper. When I print, the printer defaults to the manual feed slot, and patiently waits for me to insert the envelope.
Today, I got the bright idea to create a custom paper size for 4x6 index cards. Pages formats the page fine, of course. But, when I print, it pulls from the main tray instead of waiting for a manual feed.
Logically, wouldn't most people who make a custom size use the manual feed slot? That is the input method for irregularly shaped items after all, and the main tray is usually filled with normal sized paper.
Any printer-fooling workarounds would be much appreciated!
rcarbaugh

Peter:
The "where to print" dialog takes place in the print menu, not the page setup. So, even in a template, the print dialog follows the last file printed, rather than any data in the template.
There are a couple of ways to make it happen, but they are "workarounds" for the issue. I can do that, of course; I have been using workarounds since my Mac Plus. The answer I am looking for is why does the printer know when you select an envelope page setup, but not when you select a 4x6 card setup. There is a difference in the page setup, and I would like access to it, if possible.
You may be right, though, about it being in the driver from the printer mfr. If that is the case, there is probably not much hope for a complete solution. It used to do it in my GCC laser, too, if I recall correctly.
Thanks.
rcarbaugh

Printer Driver Problem? Page margins shift when using paper tray vs. manual feed

I am printing to an Apple LaserWriter 12/640 PS. The printed page and page margins are PERFECT (WYSIWYG; "What you see is what you get") when printing either to: (a) the MANUAL FEED TRAY of the Apple LaserWriter 12/640 PS; or (b) PDF to view on screen.
HOWEVER, when printing to the LaserWriter using the (ordinary/usual) paper cassette (you know, the thing that holds the 200+ sheeets of blank paper), two margin problems occur: (1) the uppermost portion of page content is shifted down 3/4" (maybe closer to 11/16") vs. its position on the manually fed paper. This, in turn, causes the botttom portion of the page content to run off below the printed page. (2) The "unprintable region" on the right edge of the paper expands from 1/8" with the manually fed paper to 7/16" when using the paper cassette. This shows up as an extra 5/16" (7/16" - 1/8" = 5/16") of white space/missing page content on the right edge.
The problem is consistent and reproduceable. It happens with cassette fed output from Safari, Word 2011, Acrobat X, TurboTax, Quicken Essentials for Mac, and TextEdit.
BIG problem when printing long documents whose content and margin settings I cannot control (e.g., third-party documents from Acrobat, anything from Quicken Essentials or TurboTax, pages from Safari, etc.). The only workaround is to feed everything manually (UGGH!).
I suspect the printer driver is faulty since the problem detailed above happens with so many applications. Is there a way to edit a plist (using the application/utility "Pref Setter" or similar) to overide the driver's margin settings?
I believe the print driver is "Apple LaserWriter 12/640 PS v2015.105" (from Sytem Prefences->Print&Scan->Options and Supplies->Driver).
Any help greatly appreceated.

Thanks! It works perfectly! I even saved my original "oversize" document by printing it to PDF with the scaling so the problem is permanently cured, at least for this document.

How to change designer workflow status manually?

Hi All,
I need to change designer workflow status manually. I tried to edit with datasheet view but couldn't. How to do this? thanks in advance!

Hi Sam,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to change the workflow status manully in SharePoint Designer.
There is no out of the box way to accomplish this with SharePoint, and we also can not achieve it with SharePoint Designer.
We can use the Visual Studio to custom the status.
In SharePoint object model the status of the workflow is modeled through the SPWorkflowStatus enumeration. Each status value is an integer that represents its place in a zero-based ordered list.
The status values can be extended through the StatusColumn element in the ExtendedStatusColumnValues section of the Workflow.xml file.
More information: http://blog.naikoo.com/?p=25
http://sharepoint.ginni.me/2010/01/setting-workflow-status-to-custom.html
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Why is manual intervention required anyway?

Hello,
recently there were 2 announcements about "manual intervention required" in the news,
filesystem upgrade
initscripts update
Questions:
1. Do I have to make these changes also, when I do a clean install with the actual image from 2011.08.19?
If so, they should be mentioned right in the download page, or in the cli when I upgrade, otherwise
I have to look through all the news back until the date where the image is from.
2. Why is manual intervention required anyway, just to delete a stupid file? If the problem is, that the package
does not own the file, then why do you not create a mother package that can do everything for such cases?
Sorry, but I have to add this one: "You should change KISS to KRTFM (keep RTFM)"
Thanks.

I'll add my 2 cents, I don't believe this point has been made abundantly clear yet:
Manual intervention is sometimes required because we don't want to wipe user configuration or possibly break the system. While this is usually solved by installing duplicate files as .pacnew files and informing the user that he / she needs to manually merge the original file with the .pacnew file (migrating possible user configuration along with it), this isn't always a possible solution.
We can't do that if a file holding possible user configuration needs to be changed, but is system critical. An example:
Let's say grub is updated to a new version. Due to a change in grub, the syntax in grub's configuration file menu.lst is changed. We can't make this update for the user because we can't be sure what the user has added to this file. We also can't install the new file as a .pacnew because the new version of grub is not compatible with the old style configuration file, the system may not start up at all! Hey, we could just delete the old file and put the new file in its place, but the user will have lost all his configuration. Nobody wants that. Imagine having to fix your configuration every time you update. No thanks!
The only decent way to solve this is to request manual intervention, there is no reliable way to do this automatically. This has nothing to do with the amount of effort this would take, some of these upgrades simply can't be resolved automagically. This also nicely explains allan's post:
yaffare wrote:
Allan wrote:Manual interventions is required because we are rolling release. That means we can not just save big changes for every six months.
Thats not an argument, what does it has to do with rolling release or not? Nothing.
There are arguments like Trilby said with security issues or that its too much effort for your team or you think its not worth the time.
Non-rolling releases can postpone updates that would cause system breakage like the grub update in my example, a rolling release like Arch Linux can't do that. We don't have a 6-monthly 'stable' base to work from, or the option to let updates that would require manual intervention wait till the next 'stable' release.
Distributions like Ubuntu and Fedora don't require manual intervention because the situations where these manual interventions are required are pushed to the new release of the distribution, or are simply allowed to wipe user configuration. The downside to this being that users of those distributions have to wait for a next release to be able to use the new version of some applications.
Now as for this:
yaffare wrote:
If I can delete a file manually, than a script can do the same, as its the same for file for every user and every user who has installed the package has to delete the file.
Basically my question is: Why do you not create a workaround, so that manual intervention is not required?
You, as a person, can tell what changes you have made to the first file. You can also tell if those changes need to be put into the new file, and where they should go. You can tell this because you're an intelligent person capable of reasoning, a computer can't do this. We can create workarounds for quite a few situations, but we can't ever be 100% sure what a user changed or wants to change. We need the user to tell us what he / she wants, thus we require manual intervention.
I hope this explains the need for manual intervention.
Last edited by stefanwilkens (2011-12-29 23:34:49)

P1505 "Status: Manual Feed Required."

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for