P2V Solaris 10 flar to zone

Hi,
Ive taken a flash archive of a physical Solaris 10 server which ive copied over to a new Sun T3. For testiing purposes I want to create a new zone using the Flar I created on the physical server but am running in problems.
I followed the procedure on http://dbaspot.com/solaris/394244-solaris-10-zone-flar.html but when I verify the zone I keep receiving a message saying the branded zone cannot be found. Ive checked (and double checked) everything and things seem fine.
My question is has anyone else had any issues with this process and if so what was the resolution and is there a better way of creating a Solaris 10 zone from a Flar of a physical Solaris 10 server?? If things don't work as planned usiing the dbaspot method Ive also taken a ufsdump of / and /var which I plan to restore to the zone when it's installed so if anyone has any experience of doing that???
Thanks...

There might be ( and probably are ) a few 'backdoor' tricks which will get it to work, but from what I understand there is no supported way to build a Solaris 10 zone, from a flar, ... onto a Solaris 10 host.
Now "Solaris 11" ... that is another matter.
From the Solaris 11 web site -
" Oracle Solaris 11 Express 2010.11 introduces the ability to run Oracle Solaris 10 environments
inside a Solaris 10 Container running on top of Oracle Solaris 11 Express 2010.11. For users already
running their applications either in zones or on bare metal on Oracle Solaris 10 systems, virtual-tovirtual
(v2v) and physical-to-virtual (p2v) tools are provided to help this transition over to an Oracle
Solaris 10 Container. An Oracle Solaris 10 Container can have a shared IP stack with the global
zone, or an exclusive IP stack. Oracle Solaris 10 Zones provide a proven, tested and fully supported
option for quick adoption of Oracle Solaris 11 Express 2010.11 allowing administrators to benefit
immediately from all the new features available while providing an easy application migration path. "

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 10-Branded Zone

    Hi,
    I am trying to establish whether the following configuration is officially supported (and documented):
    "Non-Global zone running a release of Solaris 10 which is older than the release of Solaris 10 running in the Global Zone".
    I'm familiar with the idea of Branded Zones to support Solaris 8, 9 & some Linux kernels, and have seen some forum posts where people have created Solaris 10-branded zones, but haven't really seen anything that puts the official seal of approval on that configuration. Also I'm familiar with LDOMs and appreciate that I could get to where I want to be that way too.
    Any help welcome.
    Thanks,
    Paul.

    This will be supported in Solaris 10 Upate 9 to a degree, using p2v. Below is a reply I had to a request I'd put in. You might also want to read this
    http://blogs.sun.com/jerrysblog/entry/zones_p2v
    Hi Sean,
    I got information that p2v project is being backported for S10u9
    This means, that you will be able to install a native zone from a flar.
    I don't have detailed information at the moment, how this will work in terms of
    patching in combination with Global Zone and other sibling NGZ's.
    +According to Jerry Jelinek, Solaris10-branded zones will not being backported to Solaris 10,+
    Got this info yesterday evening from Jerry.
    I'll provide some more info about the p2v project for native zones in coming Solaris 10_U9,
    once I got more details.
    So, I'd suggest to check, whether the mentioned p2v project with flar on native zones might fit your requirements.
    Thanks,
    Alfred
    Edited by: ftoomsh on Sep 2, 2010 3:02 AM

  • Solaris 8 branded zone core dump on cssd

    Hi,
    Just migrated my first Sol8 machine to a solaris 8 branded zone. but on the console I get error messages:
    Nov 8 12:45:42 gent320b cssd: The process "ccv.sh" has been killed by sig#139, core dumped
    Nov 8 12:45:47 gent320b cssd: The process "kkcv.sh" has been killed by sig#139, core dumped
    the netstat -f unix
    Active UNIX domain sockets
    Address Type Vnode Conn Local Addr Remote Addr
    stream-ord 6000ebffad8 00000000 /tmp/jd_sockV6
    output doesn't list any /dev/ccv or /dev/kkcv sockets like to 'real' machine.
    Any ideas?

    This error messages are output by
    cssd which is a input method of Japanese.
    If you don't use Japanese input method cs00, you can stop it by following method.
    # /etc/init.d/loc.ja.cssd stop
    # mv /etc/rc2.d/S90loc.ja.cssd /etc/rc2.d/_S90loc.ja.cssd

  • Solaris 8 branded zone and privileges

    Hello,
    I've just installed a Solaris 8 Branded zone to migrate an old server. The migration worked like a charm, and everything seems ok excepted one thing. The zone must run a Lotus Domino server, so the process needs to bind ports 80, 443 and 389, but it can't.
    I've found things about the limitpriv directive for the zone configuration, and the net_privaddr privilege to allow a process to bind ports under 1024.
    So now, if I run the process in the non global zone as root, it can bind, but if it is launched as the user notes, it can't.
    If I use the ppriv command to see what are the privileges of the process, I see :
    1945:   /opt/lotus/notes/latest/sunspa/server
    flags = <none>
            E: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
            I: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
            P: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
            L: contract_event,contract_observer,file_chown,file_chown_self,file_dac_execute,file_dac_read,file_dac_search,
            file_dac_write,file_link_any,file_owner,file_setid,ipc_dac_read,ipc_dac_write,ipc_owner,net_bindmlp,net_icmpaccess,
            net_mac_aware,net_privaddr,net_rawaccess,proc_audit,proc_chroot,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_lock_memory,
            proc_owner,proc_session,proc_setid,proc_taskid,sys_acct,sys_admin,sys_audit,sys_mount,sys_nfs,sys_resourceSo, the net_privaddr appears in the limit, but it is not enabled. How can I make it enabled for that process?
    Thanks

    Thanks for the link, good explanations about privileges but they seem unusable in Solaris 8 branded zone. It suggests to create a role with the privileges my process needs, using the "rolemod -K" command, but this option does not exist for the rolemod command in my Solaris 8 zone, it just supports "classic" RBAC.
    Maybe the solution would be to create the good profile for the user running the process, but I'm a little bit lost with RBAC and I can't find an existing profile corresponding to what I want.
    Actually, the limitpriv for my zone is "default,net_rawaccess,net_privaddr,file_dac_read" and that's all. I added net_privaddr and file_dac_read because I saw that a "ppriv -D" on the Lotus server complained about the lack of these privileges, but in fact they are already included in default privileges.

  • Multithreading issue on Solaris 8 branded zone

    Hi,
    We are facing a multithreading problem in Solaris 8 container (branded zone) on Solaris 10.
    The core file shows 2 LWPs for a single thread.
    First LWP
    (dbx) lwp
    current LWP ($lwp) is l@1403
    (dbx) print this->m_ThreadId->m_IdImpl.m_PosixId
    this->m_ThreadId.m_IdImpl.m_PosixId = 1404U
    Second LWP
    (dbx) lwp
    current LWP ($lwp) is l@1404
    (dbx) print this->m_ThreadId->m_IdImpl.m_PosixId
    this->m_ThreadId.m_IdImpl.m_PosixId = 1404U
    Another point to note is that dbx returns 'MT support is disabled' for this program even though it has been built using the -mt option. The dbx version is Sun Dbx Debugger 7.5 2005/10/13.
    As far as I have read, the Solaris 8 branded zone uses the alternate T2 thread library. Note also that this program is linked with the alternate thread library @ /usr/lib/lwp.
    This alternate thread library is supposed to use the 1:1 thread model.
    Can someone explain why are we then seeing 2 LWPs for a single thread ?
    Thanks,
    Best regards,
    Raj Iyer

    This error messages are output by
    cssd which is a input method of Japanese.
    If you don't use Japanese input method cs00, you can stop it by following method.
    # /etc/init.d/loc.ja.cssd stop
    # mv /etc/rc2.d/S90loc.ja.cssd /etc/rc2.d/_S90loc.ja.cssd

  • How to unlock Root Account in non-global zone on Solaris 10 Branded Zone

    Hello All,
    I have a phsical x86 server running Solaris 11. On top of that, I have 3 Solaris 10 branded zones configured. Due to security policy the root account has been locked by 5 failed login attempts.
    Is there a way by which I can unlock root account in non-global zone.
    I have the root access of global zone.
    Pls help as these are production servers.
    Regards

    Hey,
    It worked. Actually i forgot to save the file.
    I changed the /<zonepath>/root/etc/shadow
    Removed *LK* & then from global zone did zlogin -l root zonename
    Thanks  lot.

  • Add zfs volume to Solaris 8 branded zone

    Hi,
    I need to add a zfs volume to a Solaris 8 branded zone.
    Basically ive created the zvol and added the following to the zone configuration.
    # zonecfg -z test
    zonecfg:test> add device
    zonecfg:test:device> set match=/dev/zvol/dsk/sol8/vol
    zonecfg:test:device> end
    When I boot the zone it comes up ok but I am unable to see the device, nothing in format, /dev/dsk etc etc
    Ive also tried to setmatch to the raw device as well to no avail.
    Basically I have numerous zvols to add and dont really want a load of mount points from the global zone then lofs back to the local zone
    Any ideas please??
    Thanks...

    Thanks but that's why I created zfs volumes and newfs'ed them to create UFS and presented those to the zone.
    In the end I just create a script in /etc/rc2.d and mounted the filesystems in there.

  • Creating a Solaris 8 branded zone

    I am in the process of configuring a Solaris 8 branded zone using the SUNWsolaris8 package and the instructions in the Solaris8 Container Guide. Solaris 10 08/07 is installed in the global zone. I have the following kernel patches installed as required: 127111-08 and 128548-08. I get the following error after configuring the zone when I try to verify the zone:
    -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z gfxc-qazone
    gfxc-qazone: No such zone configured
    Use 'create' to begin configuring a new zone.
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> create -t SUNWsolaris8
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> set autoboot=true
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> set zonepath=/export/zones/gfxc-qazone
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> add attr
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set name=machine
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set type=string
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set value=sun4u
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> end
    zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> verify
    gfxc-qazone: unknown brand.
    gfxc-qazone: Invalid document
    I cannot find any other information anywhere on this error. I am hoping those that have successfully installed a Solaris 8 branded zone can help me out. Thanks.

    I have installed the SUNWs8brand packages before I started the configuration and I also installed the patch. I am not sure what you mean if the package installed in the correct order. I cannot find what I am missing. The original installation for the global zone was using the SUNCreq with other packages added during the installation. I realized after the O/S installation that I needed the zone packages as well as the live upgrade packages. After installing those packages I installed the SUNWs8brand packages. Let me know if there is something else that I am missing. I am thinking of re-installing the O/S with the End User software group.

  • Solaris 8 branded zone not booting after server reboot hangs at ready state

    Hi,
    For ipchange/hostname change we rebooted the physical server...once rebooting the Solaris brand 8 zone stucks at ready state.
    I have run the truss with zoneadm in the log process sleep and wait
    Will post the log soon..any help to troubleshoot the issue
    Both global zone and Ng zone having same hostid..
    dmesg::
    Apr 30 13:08:50 xyz zoneadmd[992]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] [zone 'abc'] WARNING: console /devices//pseudo/zconsnex@1/zcons@0 found, but it could not be removed.: I/O error
    bash-3.00# ps -ef|grep -i abc
    root 1441 1429 0 13:10:56 ? 0:00 /bin/ksh -p /usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_boot abc /abc
    root 1429 1 0 13:10:55 ? 0:00 zoneadmd -z abc
    root 1427 1397 0 13:10:54 pts/3 0:00 zoneadm -z abc boot -f -s
    root 1542 1441 0 13:10:56 ? 0:00 /bin/ksh -p /usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_boot abc /abc
    zoneadm list -cv
    2 abc ready /abc solaris8 shared
    Thanks
    Edited by: muvvas on Apr 30, 2012 2:25 PM

    moved the solaris 8 branded zone to other server.their its working fine.sorry for late reply.

  • Inetd services (telnet, rlogin ,rsh) in Solaris 9 Branded Zone

    Hi,
    I've got two Solaris 9 Branded Zones running on an M3000. They both use exclusive IP.
    When I try and telnet, rlogin or rsh to either of my Solaris 9 zones from the other I get an error. With the r* commands I get a "Protocol error" message, and telnet just reports a terminated connection. I've tried Mr. Google, the results I get make sense for a physical host - i.e Protocol Error would occur if the server executable (in.rlogind, etc) was somehow messed up.
    Just to complicate things slightly the exclusive IP NICs are on a physically separate switch from the other NICs.
    I'd forgotten that with the Branded Zones some native features are actually handled by the underlying global zone (i.e. Solaris 10).
    Anyway, has anybody else had this same problem and how did you resolve it?
    Thanks
    Tim Shaw.

    I found out that the services in the Global Zone had been disabled. Simply enabling them fixed the problem :)

  • How do I maintain a Solaris 10 branded zone?

    I'm not sure whether I should be putting this on the Solaris 10 or the Solaris 11 discussion since Solaris 10 branded zones run on top of Solaris 11 but I decided to put it here. I also apologize is this is clearly documented somewhere but if it is I've not found it.
    Once I've moved a Solaris 10 system or zone to a "Solaris 10 branded zone" how do I maintain it. As far as I can determine, I cannot apply maintenance updates to it (ie. go from Solaris 10 9/10 to Solaris 10 8/11). Attempts to apply the associated patch bundles seem to fail in the checking out the system code. So it appears that I'm stuck with simple patching. It also appears that you can't use Live Upgrade which means that you might destabilize the zone during patching which makes it awkward if you need to maintain uptime. Furthermore, if appears that backing out the kernel patch in the zone (on Intel at least) can clobber libc.so.1 which clobbers the zone (thank heaven for ZFS snapshots - rollback!).
    What is the safest way to patch these zones? Yes, I could recreate the zone from a Solaris 10 system but I'm thinking down the road where we're running Solaris 11 and Solaris 10 exists only in zones.

    I've not received an answer to this so I've started rolling my own procedure which I hope will work well; however, it seems that there should be some information available from Oracle about this.

  • Solaris 10 local zone setup requirement/steps for am/ps 7.0 installation

    Hi,
    Is there any document available on solaris 10 local zone creation/requirement for am server/ portal server 7.0 install? Any help/pointer is appreciated.
    Thanks,

    I don't believe there is any specific documentation am/portal in a zone. And as far as I know there are no specific requirements either. I have successfully installed portal in a solaris zone.
    A good starter tutorial on zones is here: http://partneradvantage.sun.com/protected/solaris10/adoptionkit/tech/zones/tutorial.html
    Hi,
    Is there any document available on solaris 10 local
    zone creation/requirement for am server/ portal
    server 7.0 install? Any help/pointer is
    appreciated.
    Thanks,

  • Possible to upgrade Solaris 9 branded zone to 10?

    We have an application running in a Solaris 9 branded zone. The application version is not compatible with Solaris 10, however, the next version of the application is compatible with Solaris 10.
    So the plan is to upgrade the application in the branded zone, then upgrade the branded zone to Solaris 10.
    All the reading I have found so far indicates that it is not possible to upgrade a Solaris 9 branded zone to !0.
    Can it be done, and if so, pointers to a documented process would be helpful.

    fog-on-the-tyne wrote:
    We have an application running in a Solaris 9 branded zone. The application version is not compatible with Solaris 10, however, the next version of the application is compatible with Solaris 10.
    So the plan is to upgrade the application in the branded zone, then upgrade the branded zone to Solaris 10.If the next version is compatible with Solaris 10 then backup the data,
    create a new Solaris 10 zone
    install the new version into the zone
    migrate the data
    test
    destroy the now unnecessary Solaris 9 branded zone.
    For something like this play in a dev environment first.
    alan

  • Cloning Solaris 10 with zones

    What is the best method to use when cloning a Solaris machine with zones, to ensure all software is included and can be easily installed
    on new hardware?
    Thank you!

    If you use UFS, then ufsdump/ufsrestore
    If you use ZFS, then zfs send/zfs receive
    But, if you are using hardware or software RAID, you can also try to move one disk to an another machine.
    You can see with these simple examples, that you have several methods and it depends how you configured your machine, Solaris and the zones. And finally, it depends too what is the source machine and what is the target machine, and how they are configured.

  • 11gR2 scan and scan listeners are not starting in Solaris non globa zones

    Hi,
    my configuration is a 2 node RAC. each node is a solaris container/ zones on two phyiscally different machines.
    (SunOS 5.10 Generic_147440-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise).
    after installation of GI, root.sh was successful but failed when trying to start the following resources
    ora.scan1.vip
    ora.scan2.vip
    ora.scan3.vip
    the scans are not in the host file but on DNS, the GI home has been patched with January 2012 GI PSU.
    Has any one successfully installed 11gR2 RAC on Solaris non global zones? if you have tell me how you got past the scan issue.
    ***** rootcrs_db01.log ******
    PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan1.vip
    CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
    CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan2.vip
    CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
    CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan3.vip
    CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'db01' failed
    CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.497 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1536] About to doQueryResources: eType resource, nodeName null, filter (TYPE == ora.scan_vip.type)
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1544] found 3 resources
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan1.vip
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan2.vip
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan3.vip
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.564 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.565 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 1
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.587 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.609 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.610 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 2
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.631 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.653 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.654 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 3
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.674 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.675 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.702 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:39.079 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.730 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.731 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.743 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.746 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.750 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan1.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan1.vip' has placement error.
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.752 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
    CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.754 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.778 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:43.132 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.805 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.806 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.820 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.822 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.826 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan2.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan2.vip' has placement error.
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.827 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
    CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.828 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.855 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:47.212 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.881 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.883 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.895 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.898 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan3.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan3.vip' has placement error.
    [main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
    Action for VIP aborted
    thanks in advance
    Samuel K

    Hi,
    Put here
    $ srvctl config scan
    $ nslookup <scan_name>
    $ ping <all  scan vip>Regards,
    Levi Pereira

  • How to create a separate /var partition on solaris non-global zone

    Hi
    I found no simple way to create a separate /var partition in solaris non-global zone.
    I am using solaris 10 u9 and my root pool is zfs. My zone's zonepath is also separate zfs fs.
    But, I do not know how to make the /var as a mountpoint of another zfs dataset since /var is not empty.
    I also do not know if there is a way to install a zone with /var as a separate (outside '/') partition.
    That will be really useful.
    Any suggestion?
    Thanks
    Edited by: vadud3 on Sep 20, 2010 12:16 PM

    I meant a separate zfs fs with mountpoint '/var' in a non-global zone.
    I am insisting, because I do not want /var to fill up the '/' on non-global zone.
    With default non-global zone installation, you cannot avoid that.
    My zonepath itself is a zfs fs. I also have a zfs dataset provisioned to the non-global zone.
    I cannot create a zfs fs out of that dataset and mount it as '/var' becasue by then non-global zone
    already installed content on '/var'
    I want the '/var' as a separate dir or mountpoint, the same reason global zone gives you that option during install.
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Clock icon disappeared / lost

    Hi, I still have clock funtionality (alarms go off, etc.) but the only way to access the clock is by searching on the word "clock" using the new search feature. The icon has disappeared or is lost, leaving a blank spot on the home screen. This did no

  • Massive drop in speed

    Just got upgraded the other day and was getting some great speeds upwards of 17meg, however today im lucky if i go above 2.4meg. Whats happend there, is it because its still in the ten day settling period. Router read out below thanks. Uptime: 0 days

  • Fragmentation In transactional replication

    Fragmentation is happening In transnational replication. some time fragmentation is happening even without DML operations Please let me know does transnational replication cause fragmentation 

  • How do I fix this SUID file error?

    After upgrading to Snow Leopard, I had a bunch of problems but seem to have solved most of them by upgrading my RAM to 4GB. But I keep getting this error when I verify permissions. I have no idea how it happened. Warning: SUID File "System/Library/Co

  • Model A1088 Express with Airport Exteme

    Hi all, I've got an Airport Express Model A1088, which I want to use in conjunction with an Aiprport Extreme router to extend my wirelss signal to another part of the residence. I d/l the manual for the device, but as is always the case in all things