Pa allocation structure for pm orders

hi fico experts,
can any one tell us how to configure the pa allocation structure for pm orders for revenues billing thru dip profile use for service orders.
pl help
thanx in advance
regards
srihari

hi
I need to  post to COPA at the time of settlement of PM order thru KO88 with multiple order line items in PM order.
to clarify further,
Currently I am able to do  settlement to cost center as per settlement rule in pm order with one order line item, when i have 2nd line item in same order, we are not able to do settlement thru ko88 because this has been linked to dip profile.
pl revert if u need more info
thanks in advance
regards
srihari

Similar Messages

  • Allocation Structure in Inetrnal Order

    Hi Friends,
    Can any one explain me what is the function of Allocation Structue, which is assigned ( A1, P1 etc)to Settlement profile in Internal Orders.

    Hi,
    Basically there are 3 basis types of structures that are defined in settlement parameters.
    1. Allocation structure
    2. PA transfer str
    3. Source structure
    Allocation structure is basically a tool that allocates the costs incurred on a sender by cost element or cost element group.
    The allocation structure is used for settlement and for assessment.
    An assignment assigns a cost element or cost element group to a settlement or assessment cost element. Each allocation structure contains a number of such assignments.
    The allocation structure must meet the following criteria:
    Completeness -
    For a settlement or assessment to be executed correctly, the allocation structure must represent all cost elements under which costs are incurred.
    Unambiguity -
    There must be only one cost element in an allocation structure.
    Hope this helps.
    Reward suitable points if helps.
    Regards
    Tushar A.Vhora

  • Evaluation Structure for Production Order and Repetitive Manufacturing

    Dear PP friends,
    I am trying to create a Evaluation Structure with reference to an Evaluation Structure (t-code MCR7). I need to join the Standard Evaluation Structures S021 (Production Order) and S026 (Material Usage), but S021 is not appearing to choose characteristics and key figures.
    Does anyone have suggestions?
    My requirement is to create a report where I can see goods receipt x goods issues per order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Marcos

    Hi,
             As we know that In Repetitive Manufacturing, components are often staged at the production line without reference to a particular order.
    To create the demand program again for your production order, you must define the planning strategy for a product. Planning strategies represent the methods of production for planning and manufacturing or procuring a product. and run the scenario accordingly.
    Regards
    Chandra

  • Allocation table for Purchase Order

    Hi there,
    Could you please advise me what should I do with my issue?
    When trying to create allocation table: Purchase Order Reference, got message 'No data corresponding to selection exists'
    Please tell me detail the step that I need to do.
    Greatly thank you for your help.
    Kind Regards,
    2tea
    Edited by: 2tea on Aug 12, 2008 9:50 PM
    Please ignore this posting, problem solved. Thanks.

    u cn acess po history from info record for a vendor material
    in tc me12
    and there by using f1 help and technical info u can get the table name and   the field
    as po history is stored in the inforecord

  • Append Structure for Service Orders

    Dear Expert
    I would like to add the "changed by" field in the General Data Tab of Service Order.
    For that, I appended the following structures: CRMT_BSP_SRV_OIC_SRCHRES and CRMT_BSP_SRV_SEARCH with the cahnged_by field as defined in  CRMD_ORDERADM_H.
    After that, I was able to add this field in the field group and generate the layout successfully. Now this field is displayed within PCUI but not populated.
    What is missing?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Best regards
    Stephanie

    Hi Stephanie,
    You have to populate the field in the Model access class associated with the screen.
    Reward if helpful.
    Regards,
    Naveen

  • Table/Structure for process order's auto batch determined component.

    Hi PP Gurus,
    We're struggling to get the Structure/Table name where data pertaining to process order component which is batch managed and automatically batch determined goes. We know RESB is the table where it gets updated after saving Process order. But we want the structure/table name before saving the Released Process order. Can anybody please help to get it?
    Thanks,
    Abu Arbab

    Abuarab,
    I think it will in structure CAUFVD. Following are the enchancements available as of ECC 6.0,
    PPCO0001  Application development: PP orders
    PPCO0002  Check exit for setting delete mark / deletion indicator
    PPCO0003  Check exit for order changes from sales order
    PPCO0004  Sort and processing exit: Mass processing orders
    PPCO0005  Storage location/backflushing when order is created
    PPCO0006  Enhancement to specify defaults for fields in order hea
    PPCO0007  Exit when saving production order
    PPCO0008  Enhancement in the adding and changing of components
    PPCO0009  Enhancement in goods movements for prod. process order
    PPCO0010  Enhancement in make-to-order production - Unit of measu
    PPCO0012  Production Order: Display/Change Order Header Data
    PPCO0013  Change priorities of selection crit. for batch determin
    PPCO0014  Select process orders for external relationships
    PPCO0015  Additional check for document links from BOMs
    PPCO0016  Additional check for document links from master data
    PPCO0017  Additional check for online processing of document link
    PPCO0018  Check for changes to production order header
    PPCO0019  Checks for changes to order operations
    PPCO0020  Process order: Display/change order header data
    PPCO0021  Release Control for Automatic Batch Determination
    PPCO0022  Determination of Production Memo
    PPCO0023  Checks Changes to Order Components
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

    Hi,
    During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
    Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
    Diagnosis :
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups  (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a  settlement cost element.
    Procedure :
        Possible solutions are as follows:
        o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
        o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a)  You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
        "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.  If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted  in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement  rule.
    -   You can update allocation structure K1
    The same configuration in  Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation  through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88.  During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
    During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
    81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
    99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
    During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
    NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
    Thanks & regards,
    Samrat
    Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

    Hi Samrat,
    The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500  is posted in your IO...
    While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
    2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
    But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
    Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Regarding bapis for sales order creation and modification

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a syncbo for sales order creation, modification and display. The bapis that I am using are
    1.BAPI_SALESORDER_GETLIST
    2.BAPISDORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST
    3.BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDATA1
    4. BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE
    Am I using the correct bapis. When I tried to create a syncbo it gave the following errors
    BAPISDORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST does not have RETURN parameter in export or tables parameter
    RETURN parameter in Create BAPI Wrapper should refer to structure BAPIRET2
    RETURN parameter in GetList BAPI Wrapper should refer to structure BAPIRET2
    GetDetail BAPI Wrapper does not have RETURN parameter in export or tables parameter
    No Export parameter referring to header structure exists in GetDetail BAPI Wrapper
    No Import parameter referring to header structure exists in Create BAPI Wrapper
    No Import parameter referring to header structure exists in Modify BAPI Wrapper
    No Import parameter referring to a field of header structure exists in GetDetail BAPI Wrapper
    No Export parameter referring to a field of header structure exists in Create BAPI Wrapper
    No Tables parameter referring to item structure exists in Create BAPI Wrapper
    No Tables parameter referring to item structure exists in Modify BAPI Wrapper
    I am informed that the above bapis are standard bapis.
    I am not sure as to why I am getting the errors.
    Does the syncbo require the  bapi's to be in a specific format.
    What would be the header and item structures for sales order bapis
    Regards
    Raja Sekhar

    Hi Raja,
      ya , for creating Sync BOs ,our BAPI wrappers must satisfy certain conditions..
    just go through this link.
    u can use the standard BAPIs of SALES Order in ur Custom BAPI Wrapper
      http://media.sdn.sap.com/public/html/submitted_docs/MI/MDK_2.5/content/appdev/smartsync/what_is_a_bapi_wrapper.html
    the RETURN must be of type BAPIRET2..
                    Regards
                    Kishor Gopinathan

  • How to create a info structure for product allocation functionality

    Hi Experts,
    how to create a info structure for product allocation functionality
    For allocating fixed quantities to the specified customers at sales order
    Especially i need help in selecting the key figures and key charecterstics for at mc21 and mc24 t.codes(source feilds)
    plase provide product allocation functionality with screenhots
    thanks in advance
    rp
    Edited by: rajendraprasad vasam on May 21, 2008 2:19 PM
    Edited by: rajendraprasad vasam on May 21, 2008 2:19 PM
    Edited by: rajendraprasad vasam on May 21, 2008 2:20 PM

    Hello,
    please have a look at the infostructure S140 in transaction MC23 and MC26.
    this is the standard infostructure for product allocation.
    I hope that the information are helpful.
    Regards
    Claudia

  • While Doing Production Order Settlement "Complete Allocation structure" :

    Dear Experts
    I am Getting This Problem ,
    please give me A suitable Solution.
    I am created Another Allocation Structure And Assigned to Settllement Profile . But it is not trigering. Not Capturing That allocation
    Complete allocation structure Z1
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 40512006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    u2022     If the posting under cost element 40512006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    Edited by: rajamallu on Jul 2, 2010 10:41 AM

    Hi,
    within allocation structure customizing you create assignments for allocation structure Z1.
    Each assignment has a source (cost element, cost element range, cost element group).
    The cost element 40512006 is not included in the source definition of allocation structure Z1 but there are values to be settled available on your sender.
    Thus they cannot be settled and thats why the message occurs. So maintain alloc. structure Z1 completely.
    Best regards, Christian

  • What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

    What command would you use to check for allocation, structural, or logical integrity problems?

    Wondering if you are looking for DBCC CHECKDB command? For more information, on that command, try to look at this:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms176064.aspx

  • Plan Assessment and Allocation for Service Orders (CS)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to run plan assessment (KSUB) and plan allocation (KO9E) for a service order (created via IW31), but I'm not able to do it.
    I can do assessments (KSU5) and allocations (KO8G) with real values, but since I'm not able to do it in plan mode, I can't have comparative values between real and planned values (no value is flowing to allocation secondary cost elements).
    Can anyone let me know if this is some sort of limitation for Service Orders? Because I checked SPRO in transaction code KOAI and for this type of orders there is no Indicator for Integrated Planning, nor it's possible to assign a planning profile.
    Many thanks for any help you can provide!
    Regards,
    Cátia

    I created a SAP message and they confirmed that this is not possible.

  • Template allocation enviornment 12 for production order not working

    Dear experts,
    i have more than 6 activity type in routing and the base will be machin hour qty means all my activity Fiance, HR,IT and quality ase will be machin hr qty defined in routing and rate will be different in kp26 for hr,IT<QC and finance.
    so i am planning for templete allocation and i m using production order.
    In templete allocation there are different enviornment for plan and actual for production order.
    For planning i have created environment 0
    Based on cost center and activity tpe ( all my activity-HR,IT,QC,Finance and one common cost center)-seperate line for each activity and plan qty is machin.I wrote the logic and same is working also.
    but for actaual .i have chosen enviornment 12 becoz i m using production order and logic will be actual machin hour qty.
    request you to guide me on actual environment based on machin hour actual qty
    regards
    RR

    dear friend,
    for the first issue please run OPU3 for your plant/prod.order type and
    set MORE days in 'Start in the Past' field
    or
    go back to your prod.order (run CO02 ) and REDUCE days in past
    for the second issue please run CR02 and fix the time (Scheduling tab)
    good luck!

  • Stock allocation for sales orders with batch job

    Hi Friends
    We have  a batch job to allocate stock for sales orders which runs every week , currently this batch job is meant for plant 1000 with availability check procedure Z1 .
    I need to incorporate for same batch job plant 1000 with availability check procedure Z2
    Just I need to know that there is any  potential impact and it  causes any problem ?
    Thanks In Advance
    Rusheek

    Hi,
    Check what difference is between procedure Z1 and procedure Z2.  As we cant see this, you will  have to analyze what Z1 was doing and what Z2 is expected to do.  Broadly speaking this is preety subjective to your project.
    You analyze and try to find out the impacts.  If needed take help of abaper.
    Rgds,
    SB

  • Automatic creation of service notification for maintenance order

    hi,
    I created one new document type (SR) as service requestion in material management.
    Then i create maintenance order for service and attached service master. System generated PR. Where document type to be given to get SR instead of PR.
    Kindly explain
    Regards
    sathish. R

    Hi,
    Please check the indicatorsin Actual cost/cost sales  and Valid recevivers in settlement profile.
    If for cost center : 1 settlement optional is maintained in valid recevivers and also for order
    and in actual cost/ cost sales: indicator to be settled in full is selected.
    Also check Allocation structure too if you have assigned the valid allocation structure.
    **check if you have assigned the valid settlement profile to order types.
    *****Most important after doing all these settings you need to create new order. for same order you will not get the automatic settlement rule
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    PMAddi

Maybe you are looking for

  • Third party steps in SD?

    Third party steps in SD?

  • Using PDF Printer in XP Mode within Windows 7 64-bit (need x86 driver)

    This question was asked before and there was no response. (See   http://forums.adobe.com/thread/782430 ) I have practically the same question. My desktop has as Windows 7 64-bit on it, and Adobe Acrobat X installed on it  I have an application that I

  • Problems with embedded font with medium or heavy weight

    Hey guys, I'm switching a current Project from Flashbuilder Beta2 to the Flashbuilder final release. I have a big problem concerning embedded fonts. The fonts I have to use are Futura Com Medium & Futura Com Heavy. Here's some of my code: @font-face

  • Itunes library will not share

    Hi, I am having trouble sharing the music library on my local network. It works from one user account, but from another it doesn't work. The settings, file sharing in preferences, itunes music sharing in preferences, etc, are all the same. Anyone kno

  • SELECT 'x' FROM DUAL

    Hi I work with Oracle JDev 10g with database as Oracle 10g.The query: SELECT ''x'' FROM DUAL is executed automatically whenever I forward my application control from one java file to another through structs. I have not coded this query anywhere in my