PA30 Header Missing

Hi Gurus,
I created new Personal area for Hungary.
and I Hired one employee for test, In Pa30 I am not getting Header Detailes for this employee like his name below his personal number, his status etc....
Even I am not getting these details in header ,if i am going in change or display mode for Infotypes in Pa30.
I am getting this info. for other employees hired for other country.
Did i missed here some thing.
Pls help.
Thanks,
Abd
Thanks,
Abdul

Depending on the transaction class (A = Personnel Administration, B = Recruitment) and the country grouping, a header modifier is assigned to this infotype header in the Header Modification view (V_T588I).
Regards
Lincoln

Similar Messages

Header missing in SOAP message header (SAP XI Extension)

Hi Experts,
We are implementing interface MasterDataUpdateConfirmation_Out between 2 SAP ERP systems. The middleware is SAP PI.
SAP PI team requested a change in this interface Stack - Replace Stack ABAP by Stack Java. The changes were made.
However, now we get an error in the interface in the SAP ERP sender system, but the message arrives to SAP PI where is processed without errors and also arrives to SAP ERP receive system and the message is also processes without errors.
The error we have in XML message in SAP ERP sender system is:
XML element {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Header missing in
SOAP message header (SAP XI Extension)
Exception of class CX_XMS_SYSERR_PARSER
Can anyone please help us? We have no ideia what to do.
Thanks in advance,
RS

Hi again,
I don't know if it is important, but the communication is asynchronous and the sender system is SAP ECC 6.0.
Thanks!

MSPT/MACM status at network header - Missing Parts

I have a query with regards to how the MSPT(missing parts) status is set/unset at the network header level.
My question is why is the Missing Part status set to INACTIVE at the Network Header level when several components have the Missing Part indicator set.
The MACM status is set as ACTIVE instead at the network header level.

Dear Chandra shekar,
check for the production order type and plant combination in OPJK for business function 1 - material availability check during order
creation for the check box - check material availability during order creation and likewise for business function 2 - material
availability during order release and the setting for release material .
Kindly make the required setting after discussing with your PP consultant and go ahead.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

MIME header missing "filename=" results in BAD messages

I've been trying to track down several issues involving what appear to
be MIME handling issues. We are running GroupWise v7.01 (we have not
installed the "interim release" yet), and all components on the server
are at that release level (MTA, POA, GWIA, WebAccess).
One of the issues I am currently working on involves problems receiving
attachments from an outside sender. Their attachments are readable if
sent to an outside test account (i.e. - we've tested it with Yahoo
web-based mail, and a RoadRunner POP3 account using Outlook as the client).
The problem is that these e-mails either get dumped by the GWIA to the
GWPROB directory, or the e-mails go through, but the attachments are
corrupted (they do show up as attachments to the e-mail, but are
unreadable).
I haven't looked at why some e-mails go through and some don't, but I
did find out why the attachments are unreadable on the delivered
e-mails, and why the rest are just undeliverable. For whatever reason,
the sender's mail server (or AV gateway or whatever else had a chance to
touch the e-mail) is either not inserting, or is stripping out the
"filename=" from the MIME header just before the encoded attachment.
Adding this back into the message (by editing the original e-mail
w/header, and dropping the modified message into the GWIA "RECEIVE"
directory) fixes the attachment AND makes the e-mail deliverable.
Below I have an example of a bad e-mail which was originally sent to our
GWPROB directory, but was successfully delivered with a readable
attachment through a separate POP3 account (RoadRunner). Following this
"bad" e-mail example is the "fixed" version of that same e-mail, which
was delivered successfully to our user, with the attachment also being
readable.
*************** This is the original "BAD" e-mail ***************
MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=73686
RCPT To:<[email protected]>
Received: from test.rr.com ([65.xx.xx.xx])
by smtp.ourhost.com with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from local.com (rrcs-24-xx-xx-xx.central.biz.rr.com [24.xx.xx.xx])
by test.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1LKSFTm009106
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:25:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Telexis Gateway
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx"
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
This is a test
-Test Sender
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel;
name="1st Q 2007 Income to Budget.xls"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
"1st Q 2007 Income to Budget.xls"
0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAZgAAAAAAAAAA
EAAA/v///wAAAAD+////AAAAAGUAAAD/////////////////////////////////////////////
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx--
************** END OF BAD E-MAIL **************
*************** This is the "fixed" e-mail ***************
MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=73686
RCPT To:<[email protected]>
Received: from test.rr.com ([65.xx.xx.xx])
by smtp.ourhost.com with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from local.com (rrcs-24-xx-xx-xx.central.biz.rr.com [24.xx.xx.xx])
by test.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1LKSFTm009106
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:25:54 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Telexis Gateway
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx"
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
This is a test
-Test Sender
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel;
name="1st Q 2007 Income to Budget.xls"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="1st Q 2007 Income to Budget.xls"
0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAAAZgAAAAAAAAAA
EAAA/v///wAAAAD+////AAAAAGUAAAD/////////////////////////////////////////////
--Mark=Num1_Lev1_2007221202554265_Tlx--
************** END OF "FIXED" E-MAIL **************
The only change I made, which both allowed the above e-mail to be
delivered and made the attachment readable, was the addition of the
"filename=" just before the file name on the line after the
"Content-Disposition: attachment;".
I did the same test with an e-mail that had the same "filename="
missing, but somehow was successfully delivered to our user (again, the
attachment was unreadable). Adding the "filename=" into the resent
message did make the attachment readable.
I haven't looked to see if the sender's system is actually non-compliant
for excluding the "filename=" (I will be doing that later this evening),
or whether this is a GWIA problem for not being able to handle this. I
just wanted to throw this out there to see if anyone else has seen this.
Does the "interim release" update by chance fix this?
Thanks,
Greg Niese

Does this email come in directly to GWIA (or do you have a relay host in
between)? I must say I've never experienced this problem on any of the GW
systems I administer. Could you tell us what domain this is coming from?
Ted Kumsher
>>> On 2/23/2007 at 8:21 AM, in message
<[email protected]>, Greg
Niese<[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that this shouldn't be accepted as a valid "filename parameter"
> line. There are two ways to "not accept" this invalid parameter: "stop
> processing" the e-mail because of the problem (discard the e-mail), or
> discard the bad parameter and continue processing the rest of the e-mail
> (this could only work when the parameter is optional, as in this case).
> The GWIA seems to take the route of "stop processing", and then moving
>
> the resultant "bad" e-mail to the GWPROB directory.
>
> I say "seems" because in many cases where this occurs the e-mail doesn't
> get sent to the GWPROB directory, but instead still gets through the
> GWIA to the user. The attachments are corrupted, but still show up
> correctly in the attachment window, so everything seems OK with the
> e-mail & attachment - until you try to open the attachment.
>
> If there is a semi-colon after the "Content-disposition" type, the GWIA
> should see a valid disposition parameter following. But if it sees an
> invalid parameter, as in this case, what is the GWIA doing? It must
> either be discarding the invalid parameter, or "uses" it by either
> incorrectly parsing it as part of the header, or lumping it in as part
> of the attachment. If it "uses" in any way the invalid line of data -
> that sounds like the definition of "accepting" it, isn't it?
>
> To test whether the GWIA is actually using, and therefore "accepting",
> this bad parameter, I simply removed the malformed parameter (having the
>
> line in or out shouldn't matter if the GWIA's not using it), and I tried
>
> this both with the semi-colon removed from the end of the
> "content-disposition" type, and with that semi-colon left in place. In
> both cases the GWIA properly processed the e-mail and the attachment was
> readable! What does that mean? If the GWIA was truely NOT
> using/accepting that invalid header parameter (i.e. - the GWIA discards
> it), then the e-mail and attachment should go through OK. Since this
> isn't what happens when the bad line is left in place (the attachments
> DO NOT come through OK, but the e-mail often does get to the user's
> mailbox), then the GWIA must be accepting that bad parameter as either a
>
> part of the header, or a part of the attachment.
>
> I suspect that in those cases that these e-mails are sent to the problem
> directory, instead of being delivered with a corrupt attachment, the
> GWIA isn't really recognizing that the optional disposition parameter is
>
> "bad". The reason for the e-mail going to the problem directory is
> probably due to an error while trying to decode the attachment if the
> bad parameter is treated as part of the attachment, or if part of the
> attachment is being lumped in with the malformed parameter as it is
> parsed.
>
> I agree that how the GWIA should go about "not accepting" bad header
> parameters may be debatable (assuming that the GWIA were actually
> halting processing of the e-mail when this type of problem is found, and
> then sending the e-mail to the problem directory every time). But in
> cases such as this, since the parameter itself is optional, it would
> seem that the better route would be for the GWIA to discard the
> parameter and continue processing, instead of "discarding" the whole
> e-mail (to the problem directory). "Discarding the bad parameter" seems
> to be what is being done by at least a few other competing SMTP agents,
> since the other mail systems I tested with did get the e-mail through
> without corrupting the attachment.
>
> I may suggest that the sender's company fix whatever is going on at
> their server, but it probably won't do any good (I've already been told
> that they don't experience this problem with anyone else). In the
> meantime, my user (yes...he is the CEO), will have to continue to have
> some important e-mails sent to one of his personal accounts, because
> those e-mail systems receive these e-mails fine, but our GroupWise
> system can't.
>
> :-(
>
> -Greg
>
>
>
> Michael Bell wrote:
>> No it shouldn't, IMO.
>>
>> It's a matter of interpretation, of course. But GWIA is 100% right in
> not
>> accepting this as vaid (that part is beyond any debate - it's in the
> RFC).
>>
>> The only part that can be debated is "should GWIA then pass the buck"?.
> In
>> olden days, many would have said yes.
>>
>> But In general, no. Moving away from Postel's law, which was formulated
> in a
>> pre-malware age, is pretty much needed. Tight specifications and
> pickiness
>> is good. Collateral damage is unfortunate, and of course one needs to be
>
>> flexible if this is a widespread issue (which frankly, it is not in this
>
>> case), but otherwise it is up to to sender to fix their issue.
>>
>> 90% of viruses and malware in the last 6 years (and I'm well aware of
> them,
>> working in the email security field) are from MALFORMED e-mail, that the
>> gateway and client misinterpreted. Many of these were MS issues, but
> that's
>> another point. Point is you have to be STRICT.
>>
>> In this case this violates the generic MIME RFCs which state that if you
> do
>> have parameters, they all gotta be separated with semicolons (PASS), and
>
>> have to be name=value pairs (FAIL).
>>
>>
>> "Greg Niese" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Well, according to RFC 2183, the "filename=" string has to be present if
>
>>> the Filename parameter is going to be used. So the sending host seems
> to
>>> be "broken" in that regard.
>>>
>>> My next question then is: Should the GWIA ignore the "stray" file name
> in
>>> these e-mail headers, instead of allowing it to be lumped in with the
>>> attachment (I'm assuming that's why the attachment is trashed)? It
>>> appears that other systems are able to do this.
>>>
>>> -Greg
>>>
>>> Greg Niese wrote:
>>>> I haven't looked to see if the sender's system is actually
non-compliant
>>>> for excluding the "filename=" (I will be doing that later this
evening),
>
>>>> or whether this is a GWIA problem for not being able to handle this. I
>>>> just wanted to throw this out there to see if anyone else has seen
this.
>>>>
>>>> Does the "interim release" update by chance fix this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Greg Niese
>>>>
>>
>>

ODI Web Service Soap Header Missing Error

I am trying to invoke oracle crm ondemand web service using ODIInvokeWebService tool by providing the below parameters
Url
Port Type
Operation
XML Request
HTTP User
HTTP Password
I am getting the below error during the execution of the step.
javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Invalid Soap Request : Soap Header is missing
 at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAP11Fault.getProtocolException(SOAP11Fault.java:189)
 at com.sun.xml.ws.fault.SOAPFaultBuilder.createException(SOAPFaultBuilder.java:122)
 at com.sun.xml.ws.client.dispatch.DispatchImpl.doInvoke(DispatchImpl.java:187)
The code which is getting executed is
OdiInvokeWebService "-URL=http://slc402454.us.oracle.com:30090/Services/cte/FieldManagementService?wsdl" "-PORT_TYPE=FieldManagementService" "-OPERATION=FieldManagementRead" "-HTTP_USER=Upgrade_all/sales" "-HTTP_PASS=aYyHL7THHZYEdPNTd.1ugy"
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF8'?>
<WL5G3N1:FieldManagementRead_Input xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:WL5G3N1="urn:crmondemand/ws/odesabs/fieldmanagement/">
<apQuery:FieldSet xmlns:apQuery="urn:/crmondemand/xml/fieldmanagement/query">
<apQuery:ObjectName>Account</apQuery:ObjectName>
<apQuery:IncludeAll>true</apQuery:IncludeAll>
</apQuery:FieldSet>
</WL5G3N1:FieldManagementRead_Input>
With SOAPUI , I am able to get the response.

After mentioning the SOAP header and response file as XML with other properties , I am able to successfully retrieve the SOAP response.

OSB - Content length http header missing from business service out message

Hi all,
I am having some diffuclty with a business service in OSB. I created the business service from the wsdl and created a regular proxy service that just routes to the business service. When i run the test console i get the below fault.
<faultcode>soapenv:Server</faultcode>
<faultstring>BEA-380000: Length Required</faultstring>
<detail>
After some debugging i find that the content length http header is missing from the outbound message the business process creates and sends to the acutal web service which sends back the http 411 fault.
Does anyone know how to configure the message flow of my proxy service to ensure that the outbound message sent from the business service contains that content length http header or any suggestions on how to fix this issue will be appreciated.
Thanks

Disable the "Use Chunked Streaming Mode" property in HTTP Transport Configuration of your business service. By default it remains enabled.
Regards,
Anuj

CAT2 Header missing Personnel Number and CC since EHP4 upgrade

Before upgrade, We had Personnel Number, Name and CC as part of the header, along with Entry Period and Week.
Since EHP4 upgrade the Personnel Number and Employee Default CC are missing in the header.
How do I get them to display again?
Edited by: Shelli Ralls on Aug 30, 2011 12:03 AM

Hi,
You can do field maintenance in CAC2.
Regards
Sreekanth

Copyright Header missing in mxml?

Hi,
How does one correct the violation "Copyright header info is missing" in an mxml file? We do have a copyright header in all our mxml files, but they are not being picked up by FlexPMD. Does it look for a specific copyright header?
Thanks

Hi,
If you still having the same issue, try removing the space in between
Not Good:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

Good
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

FAGLL03 Header missing

Hello Gurus,
With the upgrade to 6.0 FAGLL03 report header is not displaying in production, have gone through the SAP notes and found a note (Note: 1130680) but this note is applicable only to bring back the GL text if it is missing in header.
But my issue with whole of the header part of the report.If any one of you came accross with this kind of issue pls let me know the solution.
Your reply will be highly appriciated.
Regards,
Ravi.

Hi again,
I don't know if it is important, but the communication is asynchronous and the sender system is SAP ECC 6.0.
Thanks!

Header Missing

When I upload a word document the header and footer is missing from the document on iCloud Pages. Is there a way to resolve this issue?

Hi Chianc,
The way ePrint is designed, it omits the To, From, and Subject lines of emails. You can view the Subject and From information by clicking View Job History, located on the Recent Print Jobs line of ePrintCenter.com.
If I have solved your issue, please feel free to provide kudos and make sure you mark this thread as solution provided!
Although I work for HP, my posts and replies are my own opinion and not those of HP.

Security "header" missing on all my emails (Mountain Lion 10.8.3)

On all emails (sent and received) I am missing the "Security:" information in the header area.
see: http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11791
A colleague who also has Mountain Lion sees this header info just fine.
This is a real pain...I need to know at a glance if my email is signed and/or encrypted. It is especially important when debugging incoming messages that are blank due to some type of sender certificate error.
I can find no "hide/show" toggle for this in the Mail app, so I don't think it is a setting that I accidentally modified, but I'd be delighted to be wrong.
Anyone else see this?
Any fix?
Thanks,
MJ

I recently began experiencing this issue as well, but I have Mavericks. Not sure what would have happened to make this information disappear.

Errow message print head missing or not reconise

i am getting an errow message that theone print head is missing. i have seen orther folk on hp chat site having the same problem with their hp 6700 premium. i have had my printer only a year and a half.

Hi jblowery,
I would like to help you with the printhead issue you are experiencing. It looks like there are minimal troubleshooting steps that can be done, please take a look at the following document to see; A 'Missing or Failed Printhead' Error Message Displays on the Printer or on the Computer.
Please click the Thumbs up icon below to thank me for responding.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Sunshyn2005 - I work on behalf of HP

Top of head missing

Hello,
I am new to photoshop elements
have only one photo of my mam but the top of her head is missing how can I fix it
thankyou for any help.
robs sis

You can't.
Ken

PO header missing with copied PO type

Hi friends,
We copied the new RB from standard PO type NB .Everything looks fine except RB's output header title" Purchase Order" is missing, while it still exits for NB.
Should I maintain somewhere?
Thanks,
Linda

Hi Linda,
Yes you need to maintain output header title" Purchase Order" in configuration of Output determination.
It will not copy from your master document type NB.
SPRO->IMP->Materials management->Purchasing-> messages-> text for messages-> Define text for purchase order. click on Headings in dialog structure, copy any stander doc. type and maintain title (purchse order) for your doc type RB.
Regards
Hari
Edited by: hari mukku on Apr 7, 2010 1:01 PM

XML header Missing

Hi i am doing a File-XI-File scenario, using Content Conversion.
Sceanrio involves Multimapping.
The problem is The XML payload created by my Sender Communication Channel Does not match the XML-Strucure expected in MessageMapping, The header of the XML structure differs which results in a MAPPING RUNTIME EXCEPTION.
Below is the Strucure of the Source XML payload (Generated by my Sender Adapter)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:MT_Source_ItemMaster xmlns:ns="http://Itemmaster/demo">
- <Records>
- <Recordset>
<Fileno>0000005265</Fileno>
<Item>00000000000000001</Item>
<Aendtyp /> ......so on
Now when i Check my Interface mapping with no data under Test tab, and see the XML Structure at Source it is like this
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
<ns0:Message1>
<ns1:MT_Source_ItemMaster_1 xmlns:ns1="http://Itemmaster/demo">
Please notice the header part indicated in bold.I am unable to figure out how i can change my source payload to look like this

Hi Thanks for all ur responses,
However it is not creating the header automatically i have run the scenario and get an error
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_Source_to_Target_1_</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
Not sure how it is happen any more ideas...wud be grateful

PA30 Header Missing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for