Packets not getting through bm server w/nat

I have bm3.8sp1a on nw6.5sp1 doing both static & dynamic nat. No packets appear to be making it through to the private side.
The static nat mapping is to a private ip 10.0.3.21, even with filters disabled, nothing comes through.
I looked through the tids and found 10065766 which told me about the _dumpnattcp command. The file generated by this command is empty.
Nat is working for some of the static mappings I have set up. Nat implicit filtering is turned off. there are a total of 10 secondary ip addresses and 10 nat translations.
I dl'd the most recent tcp stack and it did not affect the problem. any suggestions on how to proceed are most welcome.

ok here's some more info, it looks like it's working, i.e. I can see the citrix client udp 1604 packet exchange, however only one packet is sent and one received. When I do a trace from a citrix client on the local lan, the packet exchange is send/rx/send/rx i.e. 4 packets are exchanged.
>>> Alberto de_la_Torre<[email protected]> 5/3/2004 3:11:37 PM >>>
I have bm3.8sp1a on nw6.5sp1 doing both static & dynamic nat. No packets appear to be making it through to the private side.
The static nat mapping is to a private ip 10.0.3.21, even with filters disabled, nothing comes through.
I looked through the tids and found 10065766 which told me about the _dumpnattcp command. The file generated by this command is empty.
Nat is working for some of the static mappings I have set up. Nat implicit filtering is turned off. there are a total of 10 secondary ip addresses and 10 nat translations.
I dl'd the most recent tcp stack and it did not affect the problem. any suggestions on how to proceed are most welcome.

Similar Messages

  • I use more than one computer to access my four business email accounts. When one computer is on (and mail is open) emails do not get through to the other computers. This is fine, but how do I make one of the other computers the dominant one?

    I use more than one computer to access my four business email accounts. When one computer is on (and mail is open) emails do not get through to the other computers. This is fine, but how do I make one of the other computers the dominant one?

    I assume these are POP accounts and all computers are set to remove from Server after downloading.
    So on the non dominant ones... Mail Preferences>Accounts, highlight an account, Advanced tab, uncheck remove from Server, just have the main dominant one remove from server.
    Or get/setup IMAP accounts.

  • Email does not go through because server did not reply

    Very recently, I get an error message "email did not go through because server did not reply" when trying to share a photo from iPhoto to email...regular Mail works very well.  What's going on here?

    Have you changed anything with your email recently like to two step validation or your password or???
    in the iPhoto preferences ==> accounts delete your e-mail account and reenter it
    OR
    IMHO the better solution is to set Apple mail as the email client in the iPhoto preferences
    LN

  • SMS messages not getting through

    using iOS 5.0.1 on a 3GS.  If I have iMessaging turned on and I text someone who has a phone other than an iPhone, they don't get the text.  I DO have the "Send as SMS when iMessage is unavailable" button checked.  I also DO select the person's mobile phone number, NOT their email, when I'm texting them.  I have experimented several times just now with a friend and they are NOT getting texts from me.  This seems like an awfully basic, awfully serious, awfully annoying bug. 
    I am now in the middle of experimenting to see if I can text at all if it's not iMessaging.  I have turned iMessaging off, and as far as I can tell my texts are STILL not getting through.  So, as far as I can tell, there is no way for me to text now.  What's the problem?
    Rich R.

    @Rich,
    I'm on Fido/Rogers (Canada) not AT&T, so my experience may not be applicable. But I have found in the past that older versions of SIM cards would not work properly in newer phones, and vice versa. Not just iPhones, but in general. SIM cards have different capabilities, varying amounts of internal memory, and different interface specs.  It's plausible that the vintage of SIM that shipped with your 3G (or whatever you had before) might be slightly incompatible with the 3GS.
    Another gotcha that I've encountered is the phone number (server address) of the SMSC that is programmed into the SIM. Large wireless carriers often (usually) have a number of different SMSCs distributed around their network. It's possible that they changed your designated SMSC. If your SIM still points at the old SMSC (and AT&T has moved you to a different one), that might explain your SMS problems. On the other hand, if the SIM you are using is the one that shipped from AT&T with your 3GS, then this is probably a red herring. Still, I think it would be useful to put the SIM into a non-iPhone and see if you can send/receive texts, just to verify that it's not a network problem.
    Programming of the proper SMSC into one's SIM card can be done over the air -- the carrier sends a specially-formatted SMS message to the phone, and the phone then updates the data in the SIM card. You might call AT&T and ask them to do so.
    I'm grasping at straws here. SIM vintage and/or SMSC configuration might have nothing to do with your problem.
    DRC

  • HT4623 My texts have stopped getting through to one of my contacts. I can phone him and I can receive his calls and messages. I am the only one of his contacts whose  texts are not getting through. We have both restarted our iphones but the problem contin

    My texts have stoipped getting through to one of my contacts. I can phone him and I can receive his calls and messages. I am the only one of his contacts whose  texts are not getting through. We have both restarted our iphones but the problem continues.

    Have you talked to your carrier (or your friend to his)?  Could be an issue at their end.

  • Hello, I have a Macbook pro retina-2013.  About Mavericks I could set my 4K monitor via HDMI on 2560x1440.  This I can not get through at Yosemite. Can someone help me there?

    Hello, I have a macbook pro retina-2013.
    About Mavericks I could set my 4K monitor via HDMI on 2560x1440.
    This I can not get through at Yosemite. Can someone help me there?

    They really pushed that it would all work great! Has anyone had the same struggle? Are there any step-by-step instructions to get linked up?
    Call Verizon's wireless tech support & explain your problem to them.  They will provide "step-by-step" instructions over the phone. 
    Take notes too!
    TIP:  If you do call & don't want to go through all those darn promps, when you initially call, just don't say anything.  The automatic voice will then say,  "will connect you to a service rep."

  • HT1338 I have macbook without a firewire port, I have usb 2.0 port, now my os is not working I can not get through apple logo loading , I can not enter safe mode, I can only enter one user mode, how can I backup my data, I have very important data in my h

    I have macbook without a firewire port, I have usb 2.0 port, now my os is not working I can not get through apple logo loading , I can not enter safe mode, I can only enter one user mode, how can I backup my data, I have very important data in my hdd

    Here is what worked for me:
      My usb hub, being usb2, was too fast. I moved the wire to a usb port directory on my pc. That is a usb1 port which is slow enough to run your snyc.

  • 3ds can not get through my wpa2

    Not sure if anyone can offer any suggestions but my daughters 3ds can not get through the wpa2 security to access the Nintendo wifi network.  Anybody have any suggestions as to how we can get by this?

    loper wrote:
    Not sure if anyone can offer any suggestions but my daughters 3ds can not get through the wpa2 security to access the Nintendo wifi network.  Anybody have any suggestions as to how we can get by this?
    The following links may help.
    http://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/499/p/48/session/L3RpbWUvMTM3NjMzMTc...
    http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/wfc/en_na/ds/firewall.jsp
    If neither of these resolve the problem you should contact Nintendo customer support.

  • How can i recover my admin name and password from my i mac. i could not get through to it.

    how can i recover my admin name and password from my i mac. i could not get through to it.

    What do you mean "I could not get through to it" Are you trying to login remotely?

  • Packets not hitting the route-map's NAT access-list

    Hi Everyone,
    I've been struggling with this issue for two days, I have couple of VPN tunnels on a router and all are working fine with NAT because I created route-maps for nat to deny the packets that are going to the tunnel from getting NATed, I have the same config for all the tunnels but the issue is with xxx_NAT access-list that is not even being hit by the packets so my xxx tunnel wont come up. I am positive that the problem is NAT because when I remove NAT from the 0/1.102 interface it starts to work. here is my config :
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1.102
    description "xxx"
    encapsulation dot1Q 102
    ip address 10.300.301.1 255.255.255.0
    ip access-group xxx_ACL in
    ip nat inside
    ip virtual-reassembly
    ip forward-protocol nd
    no ip http server
    no ip http secure-server
    ip nat pool ???_POOL ??
    ip nat pool ???_POOL ??
    ip nat pool ???_POOL ??
    ip nat pool xxx_POOL ??
    ip nat inside source route-map ??? pool ???_POOL overload
    ip nat inside source route-map ??? pool ???_POOL overload
    ip nat inside source route-map xxx pool xxx_POOL overload
    ip nat inside source route-map ??? pool ???_POOL overload
    ip access-list extended xxx-VPN
    remark VPN to xxx
    permit ip 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.45.0 0.0.0.255
    permit ip 192.168.45.0 0.0.0.255 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255
    ip access-list extended xxx_ACL
    deny   ip 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.56.0 0.0.0.255
    permit ip any any
    ip access-list extended xxx_NAT
    deny   ip 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255 110.110.2.0 0.0.0.255
    deny   ip 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.45.0 0.0.0.255
    permit ip 10.300.301.0 0.0.0.255 any
    route-map ??? permit 10
    match ip address ???_NAT
    route-map xxx permit 10
    match ip address xxx_NAT
    route-map ??? permit 10
    match ip address NAT_???
    route-map ??? permit 10
    match ip address ???_NAT
    control-plane
    banner motd ^C

    As that is probably *not* the config you are having problems with (or are your route-maps really named ???, xxx etc. ?) it is hard to help.
    So just a guess:
    The "ip nat inside source route-map-"staements are processed in a lexical order. The naming of your route-maps has to reflect the order you want to achieve. If you have the wrong order your traffic will end in the wrong translation which you should see with "show ip nat translation".
    HTH, Karsten

  • Mail not getting through to my .mac address

    Everyone trying to send mail to my .mac address ([email protected]) is getting mail bounced back with this message:
    "You do not have permission to send to this recipient."
    What the heck is this all about? Sometimes mail gets through, but not often. Everyone is getting the same message.
    How can I fix this? Help, please.
    Paul Kirtley, [email protected]

    Chris,
    This topic did appear to be about sending, but yet the advice about Port number change would only relate to sending problems. If you are having a problem sending, while using the smtp.mac.com as the Outgoing Server, the change to Port 587 may help. This is covered in both Mail Help, and at the document at the link below:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Dotmac/Mail/en/mac31.html
    If this does not help, please provide more information about your individual problem.
    Ernie

  • Packets not getting encrypt and decrypt IPSEC

    Hi Everyone,
    I have 2691 Router conencted to Internet and it is doing Nat.
    This connects to 3550A  Switch which has connection to 1811W  Router.
    I setup VPN between 1811W and 3550A.
    3550A has connection to 2691 via ospf.
    OSPF is running between 1811w and 3550A.
    1811
    1811w# sh crypto isakmp sa
    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
    dst             src             state          conn-id status
    192.168.99.2    192.168.99.1    QM_IDLE           2005 ACTIVE
    IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP SA
    1811w# sh crypto ipsec sa
    interface: FastEthernet0
        Crypto map tag: VPN_MAP, local addr 192.168.99.1
       protected vrf: (none)
       local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.99.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
       current_peer 192.168.99.2 port 500
         PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
        #pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest: 0
        #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts verify: 0
        #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
        #pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
        #pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
        #send errors 30, #recv errors 0
         local crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.1, remote crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.2
         path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb FastEthernet0
         current outbound spi: 0x0(0)
         PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none
         inbound esp sas:
         inbound ah sas:
         inbound pcp sas:
         outbound esp sas:
         outbound ah sas:
         outbound pcp sas:
    3550A
    3550SMIA#                                                                                           sh crypto isakmp sa
    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
    dst             src             state          conn-id slot status
    192.168.99.2    192.168.99.1    QM_IDLE           1001 ACTIVE
    IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP SA
    3550SMIA#sh cry
    3550SMIA#sh crypto ipsec sa
    interface: FastEthernet0/8
        Crypto map tag: VPN_MAP, local addr 192.168.99.2
       protected vrf: (none)
       local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.99.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
       current_peer 192.168.99.1 port 500
         PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
        #pkts encaps: 0, #pkts encrypt: 0, #pkts digest: 0
        #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts verify: 0
        #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
        #pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
        #pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
        #send errors 15, #recv errors 0
         local crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.2, remote crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.1
         path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500
         current outbound spi: 0x0(0)
         inbound esp sas:
         inbound ah sas:
         inbound pcp sas:
         outbound esp sas:
    As seen above the packets are not encrypted between 1811w and 3550A.
    I have used same ACL  on both 1811W and 3550A
    ip access-list extended INTERESTING_TRAFFIC
    permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 log
    Any reasons why packets are not getting encrypt and decrypt?
    Thanks
    MAhesh

    Hi Eugene,
    I did that here is info now
            sh crypto ipsec sa
    interface: FastEthernet0
        Crypto map tag: VPN_MAP, local addr 192.168.99.1
       protected vrf: (none)
       local  ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0)
       remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.99.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
       current_peer 192.168.99.2 port 500
         PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
        #pkts encaps: 43, #pkts encrypt: 43, #pkts digest: 43
        #pkts decaps: 43, #pkts decrypt: 43, #pkts verify: 43
        #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
        #pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0
        #pkts not decompressed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
        #send errors 1, #recv errors 0
         local crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.1, remote crypto endpt.: 192.168.99.2
         path mtu 1500, ip mtu 1500, ip mtu idb FastEthernet0
         current outbound spi: 0x8319FE5B(2199518811)
         PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none
         inbound esp sas:
          spi: 0xAE0A578B(2919913355)
            transform: esp-des esp-sha-hmac ,
            in use settings ={Tunnel, }
            conn id: 15, flow_id: Onboard VPN:15, sibling_flags 80000046, crypto map: VPN_MAP
            sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4454255/2388)
            IV size: 8 bytes
            replay detection support: Y
            Status: ACTIVE
         inbound ah sas:
         inbound pcp sas:
         outbound esp sas:
          spi: 0x8319FE5B(2199518811)
            transform: esp-des esp-sha-hmac ,
            in use settings ={Tunnel, }
            conn id: 16, flow_id: Onboard VPN:16, sibling_flags 80000046, crypto map: VPN_MAP
            sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4454255/2388)
            IV size: 8 bytes
            replay detection support: Y
            Status: ACTIVE
         outbound ah sas:
         outbound pcp sas:
    Seems it is encrypted now.
    Congig of ACL
    ip access-list extended INTERESTING_TRAFFIC
    permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 log
    even though i have log command config in thr ACL  still it shows only
    2 logs
    .Dec 15 14:23:55.723 MST: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INTERESTING_TRAFFIC permitted udp 192.168.99.1(123) -> 192.168.99.2(123), 1 packet
    .Dec 15 14:29:28.391 MST: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by mintoo on vty0 (192.168.98.6)
    .Dec 15 14:40:55.749 MST: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list INTERESTING_TRAFFIC permitted udp 192.168.99.1(123) -> 192.168.99.2(123), 1 packet
    1811w#
    Do you know why is this?
    Thanks
    MAhesh

  • Data packet not getting processed

    Hi SDN's
    I m loading data from one ODS to 4 regions , the source ODS is successfully loaded from der to the data targets the load is getting failed or taking loang time .
    upto transfer rules the data is successful, in update rules data packets are not getting processed
    kindly suggest solution, points will be assigned
    thx in advance

    Hi Katam,
    In the target ODSs go to the monitor screen for a particular request -> in the menu bar go to environment -> transactRFC-> in the datawarehouse -> give the ID and date -> execute.
    Check if there are entries in that. Usually this queue will be stuck and you need to execute the LUWs in the queue manually.
    if it says transaction recorded u need to execute it manually
    Please revert if any issues
    Edited by: Pramod Manjunath on Dec 19, 2007 4:48 PM

  • Socket Programming-Not getting response from server.

    Hi,
    I am trying to communicate with server using java socket programming, I am getting the response for first two times third time when I am trying to write some thing I am not getting any response from the server,
    I am writing to migrate the vb code to Java the vb is using a c++ dll to communicate with the server and we tried accessing the dll from java using JNI then it is working fine, this dll is dependent on windows so we want to avoid the dependency with windows that is why we are going for socket programming, Please help on this.

    Hi,
    I am writing the data in forms of string
    like
    Socket sockt = new Socket(ipAddress, portNo);     
    out= new DataOutputStream(sockt.getOutputStream());
    in = new DataInputStream(sockt.getInputStream());
    out.writeBytes("Serv");
    out.writeBytes("Serv,32");
    out.writeBytes("home,serv32,run.prg,sucess");
    these are the strings to communicate with server.
    I am trying to read the same
    StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer();
              byte b = '\0';
                        try {
                   while ((b = in.readByte()) != '\0')
                        char ch = (char) b;
                        buf.append(ch);
              } catch (Exception e) {
                   System.out.println(e.getStackTrace());
    we are getting the response for the first two strings, but for the third string it is getting stucked for some time and returing some junk values like '???' we are sending the same string using JNI and it is working.

  • Mails are not getting deleted from server

    Hi
    I am reading a mail from using java mail from my mail server.
    When i am setting the message.setFlag(Flag.DETELED,true);
    the mail is not getting deleted from the server.
    I am not able to trace the problem, please help me solving this problem. It's a bit urgent.
    store = session.getStore("pop3");
    store.connect(hName, portNo, uName, pWord);
    folder = store.getFolder("INBOX");
    folder.open(Folder.READ_WRITE);
    Message message[] = folder.getMessages();
    System.out.println("Unread Msg Count : " + folder.getUnreadMessageCount());
    int n = message.length;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    fromMsg = (message.getFrom()[0]).toString();
    subMsg = (message[i].getSubject()).toString();
    if (folder instanceof POP3Folder) {
    POP3Folder pf = (POP3Folder) folder;
    Part messagePart = message[i];
    content = messagePart.getContent();
    if (content instanceof Multipart)
    messagePart = ((Multipart) content).getBodyPart(0);
    String contentType = messagePart.getContentType();
    Part messagePart = message[i];
    content = messagePart.getContent();
    if (content instanceof Multipart){
    messagePart = ((Multipart) content).getBodyPart(0);
    String contentType = messagePart.getContentType();
    message[i].setFlag(Flag.DELETED, true);
    store.close();
    Thanks and Regards,
    Luv Amieee...
    xx                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

    yeah true...
    i did not close the folder.
    i got to know from sun faq only later on yesterday.
    but still.. thanks a lot...
    luv amieee..
    xx

Maybe you are looking for