Pacman-key wiki: Incorrect information

Good Morning all
The new pacman-key wiki has some misleading information within it, that should be corrected/clarified.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … e_checking
specifically
Edit /etc/pacman.conf and uncomment the following line under [options]:
SigLevel = Never
try it. The repositories are below this line and therefore the parser takes the last invocation of the SigLevel (global) option at a local level and doesn't honour the setting. You also need to comment any 'SigLevel'  lines within the [core], [community] or [extra] repositories.
It should be clarified because it causes confusion.
Thanks
GregW
Last edited by GregW (2012-01-25 10:52:44)

It is a wiki...  edit it.
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your e-mail address before editing pages. Please set and validate your e-mail address through your user preferences.
You can view and copy the source of this page:
Oh well, nevermind, i've mentioned it.

Similar Messages

  • Pacman-key isn't working

    pacman-key --init
    gpg: Generating pacman keyring master key...
    gpg: agent_genkey failed: End of file
    gpg: key generation failed: End of file
    gpg: Done
    ==> Updating trust database...
    gpg: no need for a trustdb check
    Whoa... I was googling around and no one seems to have encountered this problem before. I had JUST chrooted into the environment to install:
    I was following this pretty carefully as far as I can tell:
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/In … ting_Linux
    Any guesses? I tried following the tips on dbus etc. None of these tips seemed helpful cuz none of those files exist. This is just the bootstrap installer.
    Thanks, Oh MySQL !!

    Did you try generating more entropy?
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pa … he_keyring

  • Pacman-key

    The tone and remarks concerning pacman-key in the wiki indicate PGP signing is upcoming(although not yet default).
    Not really needing such a system if I utilize pacman for upgrades regularly, I find it not a welcome change.
    I wonder, for example, if a custom raid boot is utilized not utilizing user but only root will not accept the pacman-key system.
    This seems to violate the KISS principle as well making the system more complex and subject to interface whammies not yet envisioned.
    Attempting to upgrade this date resulted in no package upgrade w/o pacman-key.
    If I try to upgrade w/o pacman-key included...... what then?
    Can I disregard pacman-key and run ---Syuf....to upgrade?  Am I shut off from upgrades w/o pacman-key?

    man pacman wrote:
    The SigLevel directive is valid in both the [options] and repository sections. If used in [options], it sets a default value for any repository that does not provide the setting.
        * If set to Never, no signature checking will take place.

  • Private Key is incorrect or Hash not Set

    SAP B1 2007A latest patch and WebTools just downloaded:-
    I am very new to WebTools and am having a problem with sync i.e. I get the following message "Private Key is incorrect or Hash not Set" and nothing synchronsies.
    I also have "NO INTERNAL ACCOUNT 630" in the Web Tools section of Server Configuration screen - I do not know if this problem is related to the problem above.
    What services need to run in the SAP Business One Service Manager for Web CRM and\or Web Shop to work?
    Thanks
    Ian

    Hi Ian,
    as you are new to Webtools, you might not be aware of our Webtools landing page that has links to very useful documentation to help you setup a Webtools installation correctly. Please see:
    https://service.sap.com/smb/sbo/webtools
    The following guide should help you:
    SAP Business One E-Commerce and Web CRM 6 - Administrator's Guide
    Kind Regards,
    Lilian Lynch
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • HT5429 How do I get Apple to fix incorrect information in Apple Maps?

    Has anyone had any success with getting incorrect information in Apple Maps fixed by submitting feeback through the application?

    That is the only method at this time. It will probably take some time to get it done. Unsure what, if any, window there is for repair.

  • ISE incorrect information on the Dashboard after root patch

    Hi all,
    my customer had an issue related to AD login, after Cisco dev got involved customer was given a root patch  "rpssh_12.tar.gz" after applying this during the weekend now the Active guest (dashboard) displays incorrect information. meaning : it tells the customer that from  the Weekend on till right now they have 613 active Guest Accounts. But this isn't true.
    just wondering whether someone experienced the same problem, if not I guess i will have to escalate this to Cisco too :(.
    thanks in advanace
    Lance

    I think there is some issue in you root patch installation. Try to remove and reinstall it.

  • [SOLVED] Pacman Key Signing Strange Activity

    Hi,
    I was just setting up the package verification system with pacman when I noticed it was doing something unusual.  When I ran:
    pacman-key --init
    instead of waiting for entropy, it just returned the prompt.  Next, when I ran:
    pacman-key --populate archlinux
    it seemed to go through the entire signing process itself, stating that they didn't need to be signed again (sorry for the vagueness as I can't fetch exactly what it said by redirecting it into a file or something).  The point is, usually I have to confirm each signature.
    Is this normal?
    Last edited by Mindstormscreator (2012-08-26 15:42:40)

    Does the contents of /etc/pacman.d/gnupg look normal? You could compare that directory with the one on the live media (diff -rq) to test that theory.
    When I set up package signing, I think I signed five master keys manually which I'd compared from two somewhat independent sources. After that, I don't remember having to *sign* any more signatures but only to confirm it was OK to import them. And now pacman seems to handle much of that automatically... But it is hard to imagine it would be meant to sign the master keys automatically since that would seem to undermine the point of having them in the first place.
    On a fresh install, too, the init should take longer because so little is going on. (Hence all the threads here about it hanging because people haven't read the instructions for creating entropy .)

  • Circular: can't install libusb-compat for `pacman-key --init` [SOLVED]

    So like a lot of people on here have upgraded to pacman 4.
    I can't run `pacman-key --init` to update the keyring:
    [stuart@myhost ~]$ sudo pacman-key --init
    Password:
    gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    chmod: cannot access `/etc/pacman.d/gnupg/trustdb.gpg': No such file or directory
    gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    ==> Updating trust database...
    gpg: error while loading shared libraries: libusb-0.1.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    And because of signature issues can't install libusb-compat:
    [stuart@myhost ~]$ sudo pacman -S libusb-compat
    Password:
    resolving dependencies...
    looking for inter-conflicts...
    Targets (1): libusb-compat-0.1.3-2
    Total Installed Size: 0.06 MiB
    Net Upgrade Size: -0.02 MiB
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    (1/1) checking package integrity [######################] 100%
    warning: Public keyring not found; have you run 'pacman-key --init'?
    error: GPGME error: Invalid crypto engine
    error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    Last edited by Skipper_the_eye_child (2012-01-26 19:24:00)

    That worked - thanks. It'd have helped had I remembered to write over pacman.conf of course! I've not done any mainentance for while, got a little rusty i'm afraid.
    Last edited by Skipper_the_eye_child (2012-04-11 14:02:52)

  • [SOLVED] Can't sign key with pacman-key

    I've been reading and digging all over the place but I can't seem to find anything on this.
    1. I have created my own keys for signing packages that I want to put in a local repo so I don't have to compile the same package over and over on all my machines.
    2. I have imported said key using sudo pacman-key --add rdjack21.pgp
    3. Used sudo pacman-key --lsign rdjack21 I get this output:
      -> Locally signing key rdjack21...
    ==> ERROR: rdjack21 could not be locally signed.
    4. Ok so lets sudo pacman-key --edit rdjack21  output:
    gpg> sign
    pub  rsa2048/3D1B5544
         created: 2014-11-30  expires: never       usage: SC 
         trust: ultimate      validity: ultimate
    Primary key fingerprint: B0D7 C728 31FA B2B0 6A3C  7086 DC7F DE0C 3D1B 5544
         Richard Jackson <[email protected]>
    Are you sure that you want to sign this key with your
    key "Pacman Keyring Master Key <pacman@localhost>" (645ECB0E)
    Really sign? (y/N) y
    gpg: signing failed: No pinentry
    gpg: signing failed: No pinentry
    gpg>
    5. To hack this and make pacman work with my local repo signed by the rdjack21 key I had to change the trust to ultimate but I do not like that solution. I would prefer to sign the key and move the trust back down to full which is where it should be.
    This is happening on all of my boxes not just one of them. I did find something on the web about "No pinentry" message above and the sugestion was to change the owner of the tty I'm using to be root for the signing to work but that did not work for me (su'ed to root first instead of running everything with sudo).
    While changeing the trust works that just feels wrong to me. I really should beable to sign the key.
    Last edited by rdjack21 (2014-12-01 01:50:05)

    Taking a clue post gnupg 2.1.0-4 upgrade breaks passphrase via STDIN I was able to solve the problem and I can now sign keys.
    The solution is add "pinentry-mode loopback" to /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg.conf
    And create the file /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg-agent.conf and put "allow-loopback-pinentry" in the file.
    Once that is done everythings works as expected!
    Marking this as solved.

  • Security questions have incorrect information how do I edit the information?

    Security questions have incorrect information how do I edit the information?

    How to reset your Apple ID security questions.
    Go to appleid.apple.com, click on the blue button that says 'Manage Your Apple ID'.
    Log in with your Apple ID and password. (If you have forgotten your Apple ID password, go to iforgot.apple.com first to reset your password with a password recovery email)
    Go to the Password & Security section on the left side, and click on the link underneath the security questions that says 'Forgot your answers? Send reset security info email to [email]'.
    This will generate an automated e-mail that will allow you to reset your security questions.
    If that doesn't work, or  there is no rescue email link available, then click on 'Temporary Support PIN' that is in the bottom left side, and generate a 4-digit PIN for the Apple Account Security Advisor you will be contacting later.
    Next, go to https://getsupport.apple.com
    (If you see a message that says 'There are no products registered to this Apple ID, simply click on 'See all products and services')
    Choose 'More Products & Services', then 'Apple ID'.
    A new page will open.
    Choose 'Other Apple ID Topics', then 'Forgotten Apple ID Security Questions'.
    Click the blue 'Continue' button.
    Select the contact option that suits your needs best.

  • [SOLVED] [pacman] My 'pacman-key --init' issue

    pacman-key --init
    gpg: Generating pacman keychain master key...
    Not enough random bytes available. Please do some other work to give
    the OS a chance to collect more entropy! (Need 211 more bytes)
    Well, I thought that I could resolve it using random bytes from RANDOM.ORG (http://www.random.org/, in particularly http://www.random.org/bytes/), a really useful website.
    Is it a good solution, or is it mandatory to generate random bytes using my PC? And in that case, how can I use random bytes generated from that site?
    Last edited by metre (2011-10-14 09:48:31)

    teratomata wrote:
    hussam wrote:
    I installed pacman 4.0 from testing. I did pacman-key --init
    but now I can't install anything again
    trying to install hplip
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    (1/1) checking package integrity [####################################] 100%
    error: hplip: key &quot;FCF2CB179205AC90&quot; is unknown
    :: Import PGP key 9205AC90, &quot;Eric Belanger &lt;[email protected]&gt;&quot;, created 2011-04-20? [Y/n] y
    (1/1) checking package integrity [####################################] 100%
    error: hplip: signature from &quot;Eric Belanger &lt;[email protected]&gt;&quot; is unknown trust
    error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature))
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    I found that my pacman.conf didn't get updated, but once I moved /etc/pacman.conf.pacnew to /etc/pacman.conf, everything worked.
    I just wanted to say thanks teratomata. I did everything that was mentioned and was continually being asked if I wanted to import keys.  Moved pacman.conf.pacnew to pacman.conf and everything works great!

  • Problems with PPTP VPN server authentication - Could not retrieve key agent account information

    Errr so far switching to a mac based server has been a mess. I have had it with permission issues!!
    Here is my latest problem. After rebuilding the server several times my VPN clients can't connect. Every other time it has been fine but for some reason its just not working. I did recreate the vpn from a back up. I am not sure if that has anything to do with it. Anyway below is the error I am getting. Anyone have any idea what is causing it? You have all already been so helpful. Thank you very much!
    DSAuth plugin: Could not retrieve key agent account information.
    DSAuth plugin: MPPE key required, but its retrieval failed.
    CHAP peer authentication failed for joel

    Thank you for your help John. Before I could even employ your suggestion the server crashed. I don't understand why I am constantly dealing with these issues. I cloned the install to a new HDD and then did a reinstall. That fixed VPN, so far so good. But talk to me next week, something else will happen I'm sure.

  • INCORRECT INFORMATION ON 6230i

    Hi all 6230i users.
    I would like to point out to anyone who thinks they know what they are talking about concerning the nokia 6230i handset to please have thier facts CORRECT before posting any comments on this forum.
    Updating handsets using NSU is not dependant on the dct version regardless of what or who has stated to them.
    Updates for 6230i and most other handsets are at the moment being developed and tested for release and will not require anything other than the required data cable or plenty of credit if the handset is to be updated over the air (ota).
    I too wait for a firmware/software for the 6230i and refuse to pay for it at any service centre as I have paid more than enough for this handset and see that I shouldnt need to pay for nokias problems..
    SO PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE EVERYONE GET IT RIGHT READ AS MANY POSTS ON YOUR SUBJECTS AS POSSIBLE BEFORE TOUCHING THE KEYBOARD AS INCORRECT INFORMATION TYPED BY YOU WILL LOOK STUPID .
    This forum has been aimed at the general public of this world to be seen as helpfull and sometimes informative with as little negatives as possible.
    Mis-information is not only unfair but dangerous ..
    Madmick

    Along with Tom's books I think I will consider recommending another in future ......

  • Usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe

    I've got some instances of same error from pacman which I think is abnormal when I tried to upgrade pacman-keyring via "pacman -Syu".
    usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    What action should I take for the errors to maintain my system?
    Searching the web and this forum won't answer my question...
    The quotation of pacman.log of the upgrade sesson which evoked pacman-keyring upgrading is below:
    [2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -Syu'
    [2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] synchronizing package lists
    [2013-04-20 22:04] [PACMAN] starting full system upgrade
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Appending keys from archlinux.gpg...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 5 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 1 valid: 5 signed: 64 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 5m, 0f, 0u
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: depth: 2 valid: 64 signed: 1 trust: 64-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: next trustdb check due at 2014-01-22
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Locally signing trusted keys in keyring...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 0E8B644079F599DFC1DDC3973348882F6AC6A4C2...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 684148BB25B49E986A4944C55184252D824B18E8...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 44D4A033AC140143927397D47EFD567D4C7EA887...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key 27FFC4769E19F096D41D9265A04F9397CDFD6BB0...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Locally signing key AB19265E5D7D20687D303246BA1DFB64FFF979E7...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Importing owner trust values...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Updating trust database...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] gpg: next trustdb check due at 2014-01-22
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded archlinux-keyring (20130224-1 -> 20130406-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded bash-completion (2.0-3 -> 2.1-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] Generating locales...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] en_US.UTF-8... done
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ja_JP.UTF-8... done
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] Generation complete.
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded glibc (2.17-4 -> 2.17-5)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded binutils (2.23.2-1 -> 2.23.2-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded m4 (1.4.16-2 -> 1.4.16-3)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded bison (2.7-1 -> 2.7.1-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded curl (7.29.0-2 -> 7.30.0-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded expat (2.1.0-1 -> 2.1.0-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded freeglut (2.8.0-2 -> 2.8.1-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gcc-libs (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gcc (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded gpm (1.20.7-1 -> 1.20.7-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded harfbuzz (0.9.14-1 -> 0.9.16-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded isl (0.11.1-1 -> 0.11.2-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded kmod (12-1 -> 13-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libldap (2.4.34-1 -> 2.4.35-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded krb5 (1.11.1-1 -> 1.11.2-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded lib32-glibc (2.17-4 -> 2.17-5)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded lib32-gcc-libs (4.8.0-1 -> 4.8.0-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libcap (2.22-3 -> 2.22-4)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libpng (1.5.14-1 -> 1.5.15-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded libtasn1 (3.2-1 -> 3.3-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] >>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] >>> Generating initial ramdisk, using mkinitcpio. Please wait...
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Building image from preset: 'default'
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux.img
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Starting build: 3.8.7-1-ARCH
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [base]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [udev]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [autodetect]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [block]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keymap]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [fsck]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Generating module dependencies
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux.img
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Image generation successful
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Building image from preset: 'fallback'
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img -S autodetect
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Starting build: 3.8.7-1-ARCH
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [base]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [udev]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [block]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keymap]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] -> Running build hook: [fsck]
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Generating module dependencies
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Creating cat initcpio image: /boot/initramfs-linux-fallback.img
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [ALPM-SCRIPTLET] ==> Image generation successful
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded linux (3.8.5-1 -> 3.8.7-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded orc (0.4.16-1 -> 0.4.17-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded perl (5.16.3-1 -> 5.16.3-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded psmisc (22.19-1 -> 22.20-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded sqlite (3.7.16.1-1 -> 3.7.16.2-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded sudo (1.8.6.p7-2 -> 1.8.6.p8-1)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded systemd (198-2 -> 201-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded systemd-sysvcompat (198-2 -> 201-2)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded tar (1.26-2 -> 1.26-3)
    [2013-04-20 22:05] [PACMAN] upgraded wayland (1.0.6-1 -> 1.1.0-1)
    Thanks in advance!

    I just encountered the same issue with the latest update. I never had something similar to this:
    :: Retrieving packages ...
    archlinux-keyring-20130525-2-any 367,2 KiB 1023K/s 00:00 [################################################################] 100%
    linux-3.9.5-1-x86_64 45,5 MiB 1015K/s 00:46 [################################################################] 100%
    linux-headers-3.9.5-1-x86_64 5,6 MiB 1117K/s 00:05 [################################################################] 100%
    gnome-bluetooth-3.8.1-2-x86_64 835,0 KiB 955K/s 00:01 [################################################################] 100%
    gnome-documents-3.8.3-1-x86_64 305,0 KiB 1034K/s 00:00 [################################################################] 100%
    vlc-2.0.7-2-x86_64 7,6 MiB 1162K/s 00:07 [################################################################] 100%
    (6/6) checking keys in keyring [################################################################] 100%
    (6/6) checking package integrity [################################################################] 100%
    (6/6) loading package files [################################################################] 100%
    (6/6) checking for file conflicts [################################################################] 100%
    (6/6) checking available disk space [################################################################] 100%
    (1/6) upgrading archlinux-keyring [################################################################] 100%
    ==> Appending keys from archlinux.gpg...
    ==> Locally signing trusted keys in keyring...
    -> Locally signing key 0E8B644079F599DFC1DDC3973348882F6AC6A4C2...
    usr/bin/pacman-key: line 615: printf: write error: Broken pipe
    -> Locally signing key 684148BB25B49E986A4944C55184252D824B18E8...
    -> Locally signing key 44D4A033AC140143927397D47EFD567D4C7EA887...
    -> Locally signing key 27FFC4769E19F096D41D9265A04F9397CDFD6BB0...
    -> Locally signing key AB19265E5D7D20687D303246BA1DFB64FFF979E7...
    ==> Importing owner trust values...

  • Pacman-key problem

    A new install from September CD iso. I went through install process but dumped at package install with unsigned or corrupted package error.
    I burned another disc, same problem, restarted but installed Base only (I initially tried base & base-devel) to get a working box, and then updated this.
    Rebooted and attempted to install base-devel, but still unsigned package error. 
    Next I used pacman -Sc to remove uninstalled packages (in case a corrupt package was in cache) but the same result. I changed mirror, but this did not resolve problem.
    Next step was deleting gnupg & rebuilding (pacman-key --init, etc) but still unsigned package/corrupt error when I tried to install base-devel.
    I installed each package in group individually, and found the error came with cloog, followed further and found dependency isl-0.10.1-1 was unsigned/corrupt package. Looking through forums, news and don't see anything regarding this so (giving that this iso has been around a week or two) I assume the problem is at my end somewhere.
    Installed links & downloaded package, installed with pacman -U (this suggests that the package was not corrupt) and then installed cloog, followed by rest of base-devel.
    What I don't understand is isl, cloog, gcc all have the same maintainer and therefore (presumably) signed by the same person. Why should I get an unsigned error for just one of the maintainers' packages?

    Thanks for your thoughts, this was a fresh installation of the latest CD ISO. I downloaded/burned a second one with the same result.
    Base-devel would not install as isl-0-10.1-1 was not securely signed (according to my installation).
    I was able to download isl package and install, when 'pacman -S base-dev' worked, and system is now running fine. (just have to sort out this 'windows' printer now - thanks HP)

Maybe you are looking for