Page formatting looks ok in iweb put looks different when published

Hi
I just got a new MAC Book Pro, and am still using the iweb o8. Today I made a web page that looked very much like a resume...indents , bullets, alignment. it looks great on the screen in iweb...but when I publish it and access through safari...all of the indents etc are gone or changed. Any clue what I am doing wrong? Thanks for any suggestions

No I haven't tried that but I will try it later tonight. Should I do it in word and then convert that doc to a pdf and then use that. The reason I ask is that I did turn the iweb page into a pdf because I wanted to proof it in paper form (old fashioned, I guess)...and when I printed the pdf document is was huge..
or maybe it looks small on iweb and in the actual web page and the pdf is normal size I was using 14pt type so it was readable on iweb...but when I printed the pdf it didn't fit on a page width wise, and the printed copy looked like 14 pt type....but the iweb page looked about 10 pt.
anyway I will try your suggestion and let you know
I tried to take screen shot...to show the misalignment of the text....but I couldn't get the screen shot into this screen.

Similar Messages

  • Graphics look different after publishing

    I am creating a new site and after publishing, the TIF images I use change color. I change the background color of the image which looks fine on iweb but different when published.
    Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
    Thanks for your advice in advance.

    Phil:
    I see all red links and only one has a mouse over action which is a green underline. Actually there are two that are just white text and not linked. You might try using the Publish all to .Mac menu option to force a rebuild of all the pages. That might do it.
    OT

  • In FF4, why does my website looks different when www is omitted

    ''locking as a duplicate - https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715''
    My site looks different when I use www in the address and when I omit www. Look at http://www.dynapipe.co.uk and http://dynapipe.co.uk.
    This doesn't happen with FF3 or IE7, 8 or 9 or Google Chrome, only FF4

    Oops, responded to a duplicate of your post over here: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/814715

  • IWeb site looks completely different when published compared to on iWeb...

    For whatever reason, whenever I publish my website (I published it to a "local folder"), it looks completely different and VERY ugly.
    This is what it looks like in iWeb right now:
    http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y53/WWEFreak69/Screenshot2011-03-22at34527PM.pn g
    This is what it looks like when it's published:
    http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y53/WWEFreak69/Screenshot2011-03-22at33817PM.jp g
    There's an obvious difference.
    So what am I doing wrong?

    For one thing there are many files that did not get uploaded to the server.  You can see which by viewing your site in Safari and bringing up the Activity window (Command+Option+A). 
    The pages where the navbar is down the site appear to have much of the site's objects in the navbar section rather than the body of the page.  Go to the iWeb preferences and check the checkbox to show guides and image indicator.
    Click to view full size
    The design link on the home page is inoperable.  Did you intend to have just the text be the link for the hyperlinks on that page or also the image that each text box is on?  Makes for a very small link to find.

  • Photos in Develop module look different when switching to library module

    Hello everyone this is my first post on adobe.  I ran into a problem today for the first time using lightroom 5.  I recently purchased lightroom 5 about 2 weeks ago and have been in love using it.  I have ran into 0 problems until today.  I uploaded some new photos and was going through them under the develop module editing the photos and what not.  When I am done editing I usually go to the library module and export them.
    Today I tried to do that exact thing and ran into this issue:  the colors in the photo are changing ever so slightly when I switch to the library module and are not exporting exactly as I edited them in the develop module. 
    I have tried changing the contrast/clarity to see if it would remain when switching and it does.  But for some reason the yellow on the flower in the picture becomes less vibrant when seen/exported from library module.  It is very frustrating because I spend alot of time editing the photo in a develop module and every transfers but the colors it seems.  It becomes more dull and less vibrant.
    It is not the photo itself.  I think it is something wrong with my lightroom?  I uninstalled and reinstalled and the same issue keeps happening.

    Just to clarify. When you compare the exported image to the original inside LR do they look the same when viewed together in the Library module, and how about when both are viewed in the Develop module? Are you using a wide gamut monitor and do you also use a hardware monitor calibrator? All of these things affect how images looks in LR and some are fixable, but others are not as Web Weaver posted.
    There is also another issue that can cause the Library module view and exported images to look different than they do in the Develop module:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/afm8rbh6tnc31
    The solution is to view the image at 1:1 (100%) view size. You can also use more conservative Sharpening settings (i.e. lower) and more aggressive Luminance Noise Reduction settings (i.e. higher), which will significantly decrease the view difference.

  • Why do my raws look different when I view them in Adobe Bridge/Adobe Camera Raw and Canons Digital P

    Hello all,
    I am sorta new to taking Raw photographs and I have been been using Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw to edit. When I take my photos (I am using a Canon t2i) I have it set to save a raw and a jpg. When I view these images in Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw I notice a clear difference in the jpg and raw (I understand the whole concept behind raw vs. jpg. so im not questioning why one looks different) It is obvious all the adjustments that were applied to my jpg. vs the natural raw.  My question is: When I view the same two images in the software that came with my camera, canon digital photo professionals, the canon and raw look almost identical.... My assumption is that canon is applying the same "adjustments" to my raw as it did to the jpgs?  Has anyone used these two programs and noticed this?
    Thank you in advance for your assistance.
    Michelle

    Can't say I'm an expert on DPP myself either.  I've only run it a few times myself.
    If you're seeing Photoshop freeze just by looking at the File Info tab, that's certainly not expected and you should start a tread specifically to discuss that.  The forum may be able to help you get that working.
    I happen to like the color my camera delivers in its embedded JPEGs (which I use to quickly review shots via IrfanView).  Starting with that color in Camera Raw by default just feels very natural and integrated.
    Without a specific custom profile to help you with the task, here's my suggestions for the next best thing:
    1.  Take an image with a range of different colors in it.
    2.  Open the embedded JPEG also using whatever means you have to do so.
    3.  Open it also in Camera Raw and make sure you're using the Camera Raw default parameters.
    4.  Go into the Camera Calibration tab (little camera icon), and choose the Camera Standard profile as provided by Adobe.
    5.  Tweak the various sliders so as to match the color between what you're seeing in the JPEG and Camera Raw.
    6.  Save new Camera Raw defaults.
    Some notes:
    Make sure you leave the White Balance on As Shot, since storing a specific white balance is probably not going to be helpful.
    Test your settings and repeat the above to tweak them as needed using other images.
    Keep in mind that not every application does proper color-management.  IrfanView can be set up to do so, and I don't recall whether you have to tweak a default setting to make it do that or not (it's been a while).
    Hope this helps!
    -Noel

  • SCREENS LOOK DIFFERENT WHEN Accesing GUI through IE

    Hi Gurus,
    I am new to ITS MOBILE, and i have a situation now.
    When i am trying to acess the GUI based applications, one screen looks different from the other, i mean when i go LM01 and go to INBOUND process, the screen there looks WEB based,but when i go to a different screen from the dynamic menu, the screen looks different there GUI based.
    I am wondering is it something to do with the STYLE???,/am i missing something???, can anyone please explain how do you make the screens lokk alike???, imean either WEB based/GUI based??
    Your inputs are highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Srik

    with the full hostname on url it works ok.

  • Exported pictures look different when uploaded to websites.

    I noticed that exported pictures from Lightroom  uploaded to Facebook or Shutterfly look different that when viewing the same exported pictures on my pc. Why is that?  The exported pictures were not adjusted, maybe only cropped and red eyes were removed. Yet the colors appear different when viewing the same pictures on Facebook or in Shutterfly.  If I upload exact the same picture directly from my picture folder, the colors look different. I wonder why this is happening.

    Export as sRGB will always help; however most browsers are not colour managed so the colour reproduction can vary anyway even when using sRGB. Only Safari is fully managed, Firefox works up to a point (it only uses icc v2 profiles, not v4 it will be OK with LR as LR presently exports to the v2 version of sRGB) or browsers don't honour profiles at all. Calibrating your monitor is also an important factor here and a hardwear device is required to do this correctly.
    How an image looks in non colour managed applications cannot be a basis for jusdging an image so only fully colour managed applications (such as LR or PS) should ever be used for processing.

  • How do I remove old web site when publishing new site with same URL in iweb? Hit replace when publishing new iweb site (so we could have control over changes) but new site name is attached to old via a / after our www address we want to keep.

    I hit the replace when publishing the new iweb site (so we could have control over changes - last one was not an apple based site) but new site name is attached to old via a forward slash and underscore after our www address. Makes it very messy with a very long web address.  Original address now followed by iweb site name followed by name of first page? Went for iweb as not that computer literate - all going so well?! Cheers for help in anticipation. Have to get off to work now but be great end to week if we could be sorted tonight. Rupes

    Well yes of course, if you try and publish through iWeb there won't be an option to publish without your site folder which is exactly why I told you to download Cyberduck and use Cyberduck to upload your site to your server having published your site from iWeb to a local folder.  That is what you need to do if you don't want your site name to be included in yoru url.
    It would have been easier also if you had used Cyberduck initially to connect to your server and delete your old site yourself - at least that way you would have deleted the correct files rather than relying on your hosting service to do it and doing it incorrectly.
    Download Cyberduck and then select the publish to a local folder option from iWeb and then use Cyberduck to upload your site to your server, but rather than uploading the whole site folder and separate index file, upload ONLY the contents of your site folder and then your url will be http://www.domain.com/page_name.html.
    It really isn't rocket science!

  • IWeb not saving changes when published to folder

    Hello,
    I'm very new to iWeb and to the whole web-design in general. My problem is when working in iWeb, and I save (or publish, if it isn't the same) to a folder, it goes fine the first time. But when I republish (I use republish in order to save my project) the changes I've just made i'snt there. When I go to the folder to check my website from the, I can't se changes there. That's very anoying (or how it's spelled )
    Here's what I find odd:
    ONLY when I restart my computer, the changes are there, and I can see them.
    Why is that, and what do I do?
    Kind regrds
    Palle
    Denmark

    This may be too late to help you, I've just started to work with iWeb myself and discovered that if you go to the File Menu, you should see the option "Publish Site Changes", Click that and it will save the changes.
    I've also noticed that the pages in the list on the left are 'red' if you've made changes to them and haven't published the changes, and blue when you have published.
    (I'm also publishing to a folder for now)
    Elizabeth

  • My page design looks different in browser

    My website is table based using css styles for the text
    designed in dreamweaver mx 2004.
    On one page I have very simple a table with 2 columns, there
    is text in one and my logo in the other. Both cols are set for
    content to be vertically aligned to the top of the table and are
    perfectly aligned.
    When I look at my page online my logo is not where it should
    be at the top of the table, it drops down slightly. I am living
    with this as it does not hamper the usability of my page but I need
    to know why it's happening for future pages. I only preview in
    Safari at the moment, so I am also wondering if it's my browser, IE
    on another pc shows the logo in the wrong position. I have tried
    putting the logo in a layer with x and y co-ordinates set thinking
    this might be more definate but it's even worse, way out of line
    with the content in my table.
    ALSO
    My table is 600px deep. On my ibook and within dreamweaver,
    the whole table is visible on screen without scrolling down to see
    the last line.
    When I preview in browser, I have to scroll down to see the
    last line of content it's as though the online version has been
    vertically stretched. The last line of content also has a logo
    image in it a .png file, it didn't stretch out like this when there
    was no image in the last line.
    Any help much appreciated x

    > Any help much appreciated x
    Without seeing your page and its code, we can only guess.
    1. I'd guess that your logo is within a <p> tag, and
    the space that is
    appearing above it is due to the default top margin on the
    <p> tag.
    > I have tried
    > putting the logo in a layer with x and y co-ordinates
    set thinking this
    > might
    > be more definate but it's even worse, way out of line
    with the content in
    > my
    > table.
    That's never going to be a good solution for you.
    > When I preview in browser, I have to scroll down to see
    the last line of
    > content it's as though the online version has been
    vertically stretched.
    > The
    > last line of content also has a logo image in it a .png
    file, it didn't
    > stretch
    > out like this when there was no image in the last line.
    You cannot control table heights in any way. Don't waste your
    time trying.
    Watch what happens when you preview and then make your
    browser's text
    display larger or smaller.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "Lauraghc" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    > My website is table based using css styles for the text
    designed in
    > dreamweaver
    > mx 2004.
    >
    > On one page I have very simple a table with 2 columns,
    there is text in
    > one
    > and my logo in the other. Both cols are set for content
    to be vertically
    > aligned to the top of the table and are perfectly
    aligned.
    >
    > When I look at my page online my logo is not where it
    should be at the top
    > of
    > the table, it drops down slightly. I am living with this
    as it does not
    > hamper
    > the usability of my page but I need to know why it's
    happening for future
    > pages. I only preview in Safari at the moment, so I am
    also wondering if
    > it's
    > my browser, IE on another pc shows the logo in the wrong
    position. I have
    > tried
    > putting the logo in a layer with x and y co-ordinates
    set thinking this
    > might
    > be more definate but it's even worse, way out of line
    with the content in
    > my
    > table.
    >
    > ALSO
    >
    > My table is 600px deep. On my ibook and within
    dreamweaver, the whole
    > table is
    > visible on screen without scrolling down to see the last
    line.
    >
    > When I preview in browser, I have to scroll down to see
    the last line of
    > content it's as though the online version has been
    vertically stretched.
    > The
    > last line of content also has a logo image in it a .png
    file, it didn't
    > stretch
    > out like this when there was no image in the last line.
    >
    > Any help much appreciated x
    >

  • How Can I Change One Page to Look Different From The Rest of My Pages?

    Hi, my website uses a CSS page with a dark background and white type. But I have one page I need to have a white background and light grey type on. I am not sure how to do this without it changing all of my site's look which I don't want to do. I only want to change one page to have a different look. How can I do this? I am new to CSS so please try to explain how I can do this in simple terms if you can. Thanks.

    There are 3 ways to use CSS.
    External style sheet: a separate physical file that contains all your site wide rules & to which your html documents are linked.
    http://alt-web.com/DEMOS/DW-Link-Stylesheet.shtml
    Embedded styles: page specific rules in the <head> section of code view.
    <head>
         <style type="text/css">
              page specific styles go here...
         </style>
    </head>
    Inline styles: CSS styles in the markup (mostly used for HTML emails and not on web sites).
         <p style="color:red">This paragraph has a red style.</p>
    In order of importance, inline styles override embedded styles.  Embedded styles override external styles. 
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists 
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb

  • A page ie6 looks different than in other browsers

    The site is www.GigHarborWashington.com
    When viewed in most browsers it renders correctly.  When viewed in ie6 a white border on the right is added with approx 180 pixels.  Additionally, a portion of the image behind the nav bar is repeated and the text on the 3rd image is cut off. I tried adding no-repeat to the areas of question and it created problems in ie7
    I have attached my css file.  Any suggestions on how to repair these problems in ie6 without affecting other browsers?
    Thank you,
    Mike

    Thank you Nancy,
    I am off to a meeting but will work on this later and respond if that was the solution or not.
    Regards,
    Mike

  • Looks different when previewing in browser. Help?

    <!DOCTYPE
    html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html
    xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><!--
    InstanceBegin template="/Templates/UA.dwt" codeOutsideHTMLIsLocked="false"
    -->
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
    charset=utf-8" />
    <title>Untitled
    Document</title>
    <style type="text/css">
    <!--
    body
    font: 100%/1.4 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    margin:
    0;
    padding: 0;
    color: #000;
    background-color:
    #000;
    background-image:
    url(Logos_for_Ultra_Aircare_central_vacuum/Ultraaircare%20background.jpg);
    /* ~~
    Element/tag selectors ~~ */
    ul, ol, dl { /* Due to variations between
    browsers, it's best practices to zero padding and margin on lists. For
    consistency, you can either specify the amounts you want here, or on the list
    items (LI, DT, DD) they contain. Remember that what you do here will cascade to
    the .nav list unless you write a more specific selector. */
    padding:
    0;
    margin: 0;
    h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p {
    margin-top: 0;  /*
    removing the top margin gets around an issue where margins can escape from their
    containing div. The remaining bottom margin will hold it away from any elements
    that follow. */
    padding-right: 15px;
    padding-left: 15px; /* adding the
    padding to the sides of the elements within the divs, instead of the divs
    themselves, gets rid of any box model math. A nested div with side padding can
    also be used as an alternate method. */
    a img { /* this selector removes
    the default blue border displayed in some browsers around an image when it is
    surrounded by a link */
    border: none;
    /* ~~
    Styling for your site's links must remain in this order - including the group of
    selectors that create the hover effect. ~~ */
    a:link
    color:#414958;
    text-decoration: underline; /* unless you style your
    links to look extremely unique, it's best to provide underlines for quick visual
    identification */
    a:visited {
    color: #4E5869;
    text-decoration:
    underline;
    a:hover, a:active, a:focus { /* this group of selectors will
    give a keyboard navigator the same hover experience as the person using a mouse.
    text-decoration: none;
    /* ~~
    this container surrounds all other divs giving them their percentage-based width
    ~~ */
    .container {
    width: 80%;
    max-width: 1260px;/* a max-width may be
    desirable to keep this layout from getting too wide on a large monitor. This
    keeps line length more readable. IE6 does not respect this declaration.
    min-width: 902px;/* a min-width may be desirable to keep this layout from
    getting too narrow. This keeps line length more readable in the side columns.
    IE6 does not respect this declaration. */
    background: #FFF;
    margin: 0
    auto; /* the auto value on the sides, coupled with the width, centers the
    layout. It is not needed if you set the .container's width to 100%. */
    /* ~~
    the header is not given a width. It will extend the full width of your layout.
    It contains an image placeholder that should be replaced with your own linked
    logo ~~ */
    .header {
    background-color: #051852;
    /* ~~
    These are the columns for the layout. ~~
    1)
    Padding is only placed on the top and/or bottom of the divs. The elements within
    these divs have padding on their sides. This saves you from any "box model
    math". Keep in mind, if you add any side padding or border to the div itself, it
    will be added to the width you define to create the *total* width. You may also
    choose to remove the padding on the element in the div and place a second div
    within it with no width and the padding necessary for your design.
    2) No
    margin has been given to the columns since they are all floated. If you must add
    margin, avoid placing it on the side you're floating toward (for example: a
    right margin on a div set to float right). Many times, padding can be used
    instead. For divs where this rule must be broken, you should add a
    "display:inline" declaration to the div's rule to tame a bug where some versions
    of Internet Explorer double the margin.
    3)
    Since classes can be used multiple times in a document (and an element can also
    have multiple classes applied), the columns have been assigned class names
    instead of IDs. For example, two sidebar divs could be stacked if necessary.
    These can very easily be changed to IDs if that's your preference, as long as
    you'll only be using them once per document.
    4) If
    you prefer your nav on the right instead of the left, simply float these columns
    the opposite direction (all right instead of all left) and they'll render in
    reverse order. There's no need to move the divs around in the HTML source.
    .sidebar1
    float: left;
    width: 20%;
    padding-bottom: 10px;
    background-color:
    #041237;
    .content {
    padding: 10px 0;
    width: 80%;
    float:
    left;
    font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
    font-size: 11px;
    /* ~~
    This grouped selector gives the lists in the .content area space ~~
    .content ul, .content ol {
    padding: 0 15px 15px 40px; /* this padding
    mirrors the right padding in the headings and paragraph rule above. Padding was
    placed on the bottom for space between other elements on the lists and on the
    left to create the indention. These may be adjusted as you wish. */
    /* ~~
    The navigation list styles (can be removed if you choose to use a premade flyout
    menu like Spry) ~~ */
    ul.nav {
    list-style: none; /* this removes the list
    marker */
    border-top: 1px solid #666; /* this creates the top border for the
    links - all others are placed using a bottom border on the LI
    margin-bottom: 15px; /* this creates the space between the navigation on
    the content below */
    ul.nav li {
    border-bottom: 1px solid #666; /*
    this creates the button separation */
    ul.nav a, ul.nav a:visited { /*
    grouping these selectors makes sure that your links retain their button look
    even after being visited */
    padding: 5px 5px 5px 15px;
    display: block; /*
    this gives the link block properties causing it to fill the whole LI containing
    it. This causes the entire area to react to a mouse click.
    text-decoration: none;
    background: #8090AB;
    color:
    #000;
    ul.nav a:hover, ul.nav a:active, ul.nav a:focus { /* this changes
    the background and text color for both mouse and keyboard navigators
    background: #6F7D94;
    color: #FFF;
    /* ~~
    The footer ~~ */
    .footer {
    position: relative;/* this gives IE6 hasLayout
    to properly clear */
    clear: both;
    background-color: #041237;
    color:
    #FFF;
    font-weight: 100;
    font-variant: normal;
    text-transform:
    none;
    font-style: normal;
    font-size: 10px;
    font-family: Arial,
    Helvetica, sans-serif;
    height: 30px;
    width: 902px;
    padding-top:
    10px;
    padding-right: 0;
    padding-bottom: 10px;
    padding-left: 0;
    /* ~~
    miscellaneous float/clear classes ~~ */
    .fltrt {  /* this class can be used
    to float an element right in your page. The floated element must precede the
    element it should be next to on the page. */
    float: right;
    margin-left:
    8px;
    .fltlft { /* this class can be used to float an element left in
    your page. The floated element must precede the element it should be next to on
    the page. */
    float: left;
    margin-right: 8px;
    .clearfloat { /* this
    class can be placed on a <br /> or empty div as the final element
    following the last floated div (within the #container) if the #footer is removed
    or taken out of the #container */
    clear:both;
    height:0;
    font-size:
    1px;
    line-height: 0px;
    -->
    </style><!--[if lte IE
    7]>
    <style>
    .content { margin-right: -1px; } /* this 1px negative
    margin can be placed on any of the columns in this layout with the same
    corrective effect. */
    ul.nav a { zoom: 1; }  /* the zoom property gives IE
    the hasLayout trigger it needs to correct extra whiltespace between the links
    </style>
    <![endif]--></head>
    <body>
    <div
    class="container">
      <div class="header"><!-- end .header
    --><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="header" --><img
    src="Templates/warranty_sticker_2004.jpg" width="902" height="302" /><!--
    InstanceEndEditable --></div>
      <!-- InstanceBeginEditable
    name="links" -->
      <div class="sidebar1">
        <ul
    class="nav">
          <li><img src="links/home.jpg" width="181"
    height="44" /></li>
          <li><img
    src="links/ultraaircare.jpg" width="181" height="44" /></li>
    <li><img src="links/pricing.jpg" width="181" height="44"
    /></li>
          <li><img src="links/allergiesandasthma.jpg"
    width="181" height="44" /></li>
          <li></li>
    <img src="links/contact us.jpg" width="181" height="44" />
    </ul>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <!-- end .sidebar1 -->
    </div>
      <!-- InstanceEndEditable --><!--
    InstanceBeginEditable name="content" -->
      <div
    class="content">
        <h1>Instructions</h1>
        <p>Be
    aware that the CSS frfjfyukuhjiklui9liol;ko;i90or these layouts is heavily
    commented. If you do most of your work in Design view, have a peek at the code
    to get tips on working with the CSS for the liquid layouts. You can remove these
    comments before you launch your site. To learn more about the techniques used in
    these CSS Layouts, read this article at Adobe's Developer Center - <a
    href="http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts">http://www.adobe.com/go/adc_css_layouts</a>.</p>
    <h2> </h2>
        <p> </p>
    <p> </p>
        <p> </p>
    <!-- end .content -->
      </div>
      <!-- InstanceEndEditable
    --><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="footer" -->
      <div
    class="footer">
        <p>Copyright UltraAircare
          <!-- end
    .footer -->
        </p>
      </div>
      <!--
    InstanceEndEditable --><!-- end .container
    --></div>
    </body>
    <!-- InstanceEnd
    --></html>
    So I just started a website for a project that I have to do. So far everything has been going well. Everything shows up perfect in liveview in Dreamweaver CS5, but now that I'm previewing it in internet explorer, this is how it shows up. Help anyone? Any ideas?

    Link please.
    Bob

  • Question - Y do my fonts look slightly different when publish site to .mac?

    I've created a website on iWeb but when i publish it and view it in safari the fonts look slightly different. It's hard to explain but they basically just look worse. Can anyone let me know why this might be and how i could fix this problem. Thanks in advance.

    Quit iWeb, go to Home Folder/Library/Preferences and delete the file com.apple.iWeb.plist.
    Restart your Mac, launch iWeb and republish.
    You should really convert any text done in "copperplate" to an image. Otherwise it will be converted to an (ugly) alternative on any computer that doesn't have this font installed.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Setting up my mackbook pro on an LG TV.

    Hello everyone - I am having a few problems hooking up my macbook pro to my LG TV. For some reasons every-time we set it up, it ignores the aspect ratio and resolution doesn't fit, the aspect ratio on the mac is 1280x800 but the tv can't match it, ei

  • Anybody experience with FCP X and Macbook pro 15inch 2.2?

    My old mid 2009 macbook harddrive died on me today, and I'm thinking to upgrade. Sell the old one and buy the new 2011 2.2. The old one was slow in rendering and had lots and lots and lots of spinning beachballs. Was I pushing it too hard? Don't know

  • How do I stop launchd from starting a daemon that doesn't exist?

    A while back I downloaded OpenDrive. I never used it and trashed it. However, every once in a while my iMac gets sluggish or otherwise acts up. I run Console to see what's going on and it appears that launchd is trying to start OpenDrive.I then do a

  • Can I use USB for Samsung LD190 monitor?

    Just curious... I need a second monitor and this monitor can use USB too, but not sure how to make it work with my mac mini, anyone??

  • Transferred old mac to new mac and now some applications not opening

    Just bought a new mac pro and transferred from my old mac pro via time machine back-up/migration assistant when setting new computer. Both old and new running snow leopard and had issues with opening imovie, etc. but has since been resolved. I am try