Page group approval process

Is there any way that one can set Approvals and Notifications on a page group as 'enabled' through APIs?
Added to this, is there anyway to set the Approval Routing List through APIs?
Thanks,
Nax

Hi Naxtazzmataur,
I don't believe you can do that programmatically, this is how you modify a page
- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/portal.1014/b14135/pdg_cm_simple.htm#CIADFIFB
However if you use the CMEF you could instead use BPEL for your content approvals, that way you have total control over the approval chain.
- http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/portal/pdf/portal_cmef_bpel_integration_technote.pdf
Cheers,
Mick.

Similar Messages

Are page creators / owners affected by approval process

I have a user who has created a page. The approval process for a page is setup so a content administrator approves content. However when the page creater adds an item to the page, it does not seem to go through the approval process. Is this a bug?
Orlando Kelly
Cayman Islands Government

Well, the user has to be hiding in there somewhere. How did the user have the access rights to create the page in the first place? They either have to be in a top level portal administration group or have manage rights on the page group level. Both of these will have to be removed
1) Check what groups the user is in by editing the user and scrolling down to the Exisiting Group membership section towards the bottom. Check for membership in DBA, PORTAL_ADMINISTRATION, etc. If any of those are listed, edit the corresponding group and remove that user from the group
2) Edit the page group properties and check what access rights the user has on the page group level. If listed with anything higher than view, remove the user
3) Check the page properties on the specific page in question and verify what access the user has on the page. It should be MANAGE ITEMS WITH APPROVAL
Rgds/Mark M.

How to use a pwa group in CREATE A TASK PROCESS in SPD 2013 for project server workflow approval process

I am working on a Project Server 2013 workflow. I am creating this using Sharepoint Designer 2013. In this workflow I am using approval process at one stage. I have created a security group SalesManagers in PWA. I want to use this group for workflow approval
process. I want all users of this group get approval tasks.
For this I used START A TASK PROCESS activity in the SP Designer. I clicked on
this user and created task process. But here I could not find SalesManager group which I created in PWA. I was only able to find the users. I can also see
Administrators for PWA . But couldnot find SalesManager or any other security group created in pwa.
Can anyone suggest how I can get the security group created in pwa.

NBDevelopment,
I believe SPD only recognizes the SharePoint Groups and not the project server security groups.
The Administrators for PWA, and few other groups like Project Managers for PWA etc., are synced SharePoint Groups with the security groups, which is why they show up in SPD.
You could create a SharePoint Group for the Sales Managers group and use that in SPD.
Cheers,
Prasanna Adavi, Project MVP
Blog:
Podcast:
Twitter:
LinkedIn:

How to send a group notification in approval process?

I'd like to send a group notification in approval process, so as to tell them that they hava pending tasks in OIM.
As if the out of the box does not support sending an email to a group of users. I have written the custom code
to implement it, but I don't know where should I attach the adapter/event handler in the approval process.
Any suggestions will be helpful! Thanks!

Hi,
I you can attach the adapter to to approval task as you attach adapter to other process task.If you are writing task assignment adapter then you can also attach this adapter in assignment tab.
Regards
Nitesh

Req approval process with Purchasing groups

Hi Gurus,
Can anybody please help me with this. I need to setup the req approval process with purchaisng groups. how do i do that? The scenario is this: 1) A computer is requested and it is worth 1200 USD and the requestor puts the pur grp in the PR. since this is level 1 the email should only go to one person. ( The levels are 1000 -4999 - level1, 5000 - 9999 level2, 10000 and above level3). Can anybody please help me with this. Quick response is greatly appreciated
thanks
Anusa
Edited by: anusha vemulapati on Mar 10, 2009 9:44 PM

Hi,
The steps are as follows:
Create Characteristics & link to comm. structre (CEBAN for PR)
Create Class & link to characteristic
Create Release Groups & link to class
Create Release Codes
Release Indicator
Set up strategies
- Strategies & Codes
- Prerequeirements
- Status
- Assign values for strategies
Set overall / item for doc type (PR only)
Create and allocate autorisation profiles
You can see the same in SAP123.com with screen shots.
REgards
Ram

Web Page Composer (WPC) – Web page - Approval process

We have requirement with our web publishing environment where we want to stage the web pages for review before they are published for public. Currently, if you develop a web page in Web Page Composer ( WPC ) and click publish to review the content/layout. The page is published for public and included in TRex and can be searchable.
We thought KM Approval process will help resolve this issue. The approval process work very well with the u2018Site Contentu2019 where once author develop the content (article, paragraph etc.) and submit for approval in this case Editor (role). The content under site content folder is not published (not available for public) until approved by Editor.
This same approval process does not work on the Web Page folder. We have exactly same permission/ Service permission setup on the Web Page folder. Even though the u2018Approvalu2019 is turned on the Web Page folder it does not inherit the same to new web pages created or existing web pages in that folder. If we go and turn on the u2018Approvalu2019 on a page then we see a u2018Approvalu2019 button in WPC but when you submit the page for approval it pops up another screen with below message.
Confirm that you want to publish the page. A new version of the homepage will be created and, if appropriate, submitted for approval. Changes to pages not subject to approval are active immediately.
When you confirm this message nothing happens (no workflow kicks off).
I would like to hear if any one has tried the approval process on WPC web pages. If you are not using this process how you are staging the web page for review before publishing to public.
Thanks.

Hi Bertina,
We encountered the same problem couple days back in our environment. There is a SAP note (# 1294833) which details the issue but affected version indicated in this note is different then what we are on so we decided to create a note for SAP.
Below is SAP response for this issues
13.09.2010 - 08:52:12 CET - Reply by SAP
Dear customer,
I can confirm that the issue described in SAP Note 1294833 is indeed
present in EP 7.01 SP4 and is the reason you are currently experiencing
this problem.
Unfortunately, as outlined in the note, there is no workaround
available but our developers have advised me that the fix will be
included in the next patch for KMC WEB PAGE COMPOSER 7.01 SP04.
Hope this helps.

Approval process in Web page composer

Hi there,
We are building static pages using web page composer and trying to implement the KM approval process for those static pages. Now my questions are:
1. What should be the value I need to give for the folders for service permissions (Layout, collaboration,Full control etc...) for anonymous users
2. What should be the value I need to give for the folders for service permissions (Layout, collaboration,Full control etc...) for users with approval authorities
Your help is highly appreciated
Regards,
Ponraj M

Hi,
The approval process has nothing to do with the service permissions. It's regular permissions you should be concerned about, for example: If a user is a permissions owner of a folder then he will be able to skip the approval process or If a user has only read permissions then he will be able to view only approved documents.
Best regards,
Avishai Zamir

Question about set approval process on a page.

Dear all,
Here is my scenario:
I created a page for HR department. There are 3 regions (HR Documents, News and Events) on the page for uploading files.
3 workers in HR department are responsible for uploading their files into the 3 regions respectively.
The question is that since each worker is responsible for each region only, is there a way to limit the ADD/UPDATE priviliage for a region to a particular worker so that other workers cannot access them.
Also, can more than 1 approval process be defined on a page such that the ADD/UPDATE actions by the 3 workers can be approved by another 3 supervisors?
thanks
George (HK)

Hey George:
There is no way to do what you seek directly, however, if you make each region a page portlet of a stand alone page, then you can achieve exactly what you seek.
Setup identical blank pages with regions configured however you need (you may want to use a template so changing a region layout or attribute display will automatically apply to each page). Give each user appropriate permissions and setup the desired approval path for each page. In page properties, make sure show as portlet is checked on the optional tab. Move the files form each region to the new pages and add these page portlets to the page where the files are currently located. If you turn on the edit bar for each portlet, the users can add files without having to drill down to the actual storage page
Rgds/Mark M.

Customize approval process

Hi
i am running approval process on a list
1)and how i customize default email messages for
i have these users Requesters,Approver sharepoint group
Requester : when new item created
Approvers: when new item created
Requeser: when approver or rejected
2)
when approver receive email how i display a task list link in approvers email
3) when approver do action approver/reject he will add comments , so i want to display this comment and his name in new item form (there is a fild in list Approvername, approver field)
adil

Hi adil ,
Firstly , for your 1 and 2 question, here is a great guide blog you can refer to:
5 Steps to Enhance SharePoint 2010 Approval Workflow
Secondly, for your 3 question, here is the detailed steps you can refer to:
1. In the SharePoint Designer workflow, click approval for going to the approval setting page.
2. Click Change the behavior of a single task under Customization. Find When a Task Completes, create two Set Workflow Variable actions as below:
3. Go to the approval setting page , click Change the behavior of the overall task process. Find When the Task Process Completes, create two Set Field in Current Item
actions as below:
Hope this helps!
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Approved invoices can not be edited - Approval process

Hi Experts -
I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it.
please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
10.07.2009 10:32 Description (English) by SRS Manian
     We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The
'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user.
When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information
(lines as well as Sales person) and approve it.
The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at
all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out.
The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full
authorization to the system.
10.07.2009 10:35 Info to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Partner/Customer,
We have received your inquiry and are currently processing it.
You will be contacted with a solution or an update as soon as possible.
For further details regarding the phase your message is in at the
moment please refer to:
http://service.sap.com/%7Esapidb/011000358700000575782007E
Kind regards,
SAP Business One Product Support
10.07.2009 10:59 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us.
When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status.
When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document.
To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval.
I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator?
The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 11:59 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Thanks for the reply. The scenario is when the Manager receives the
document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and
documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is
available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who
orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the
Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document.
When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert
window to open the document - it is still greyed out !!
How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ?
regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:11 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'?
If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it.
Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document.
I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 12:28 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi:
The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status
below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:42 Call to Customer / Partner by SAP
     Performed on: 10.07.2009 10:41:59 (UK)
Contact person: SRS Manian
Status of discussion: Customer not reached
Subject:
Called the partner but currently engaged on another line.
Would like to hold a webex.
10.07.2009 12:42 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile.
When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d.
The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 18:11 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi:
Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following:
1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals
required as '1'.
2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users
Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system
expects both of them to approve or reject -
Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the
way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it
is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 05:52 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision b ecause a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration
forum. You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is beingmoderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum. Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
SAP Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
11.07.2009 09:02 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given doesnot address the
problem we are beingfaced with our client
Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is
addressed in future
I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 10:04 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken] This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately,we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874.
I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
SAP Notes
Number     Short text
0001035200
Issue can be solved via existing documentation
0001111431
Deleting rejected draft documents.
0001167635
Maintenance Policy (L)
0001321234
Status of a document rejected within the Approval Process.

Hi Gordon - thanks for the reply - i am sorry i never realized that the message i raised could be messed up like this - the following is a clear message with some paragraphs:
Hi Experts - I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it. please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
SRS Manian We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The 'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user. When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information (lines as well as Sales person) and approve it. The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out. The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full authorization to the system.
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us. When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status. When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document. To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval. I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator? The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference. Best regards, Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland 10.07.2009 11:59
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Thanks for the reply.
The scenario is when the Manager receives the document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document. When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert window to open the document - it is still greyed out !! How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ? regards Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian, If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'? If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it. Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document. I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian 10.07.2009 12:42
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile. When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d. The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following: 1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals required as '1'. 2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system expects both of them to approve or reject - Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision because a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration forum.
You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is being moderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum.
Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed. Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant SAP Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given does not address the problem we are being faced with our client Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is addressed in future I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately, we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874. I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland

Moving Pages from one Page Group to Another Group

Hello,
How do you move pages, styles, or items from one page group to another page group?
On the same machine, I have three page groups called Production, Acceptance, and Test. Once I set up a page that I like on the page group Test, what is the best way to move the page(and its items, portlets,etc) to the page group Acceptance, and then move it into Production?
Also, how does security and approvals affect this? There is only limited amount of people that are able to get into the Test Page Group, or Acceptance Page Group. Would any copying process make sure the page approvers be copied across correctly? Or will manual intervention be needed.
I'm using Oracle Portal Release 2 (9.0.2) running on a solaris machine.
Much thanks for your assistance.
Anson

hi There,
As far as i know, the pages can only be moved within the page group but not from one page group to another page group.
Regards,
Deepak

"Bad page state in process swapper" with Oracle Linux 5.9

Dear All,
We got "localhost kernel: BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:5e13c2e" when booting Oracle Linux 5.9.
The system is installed with -
1. CPU: 2 x Xeon E5-2690
2. Mem: 384 GB
3. QLE 2562 FC
4. Oracle Linux 5.9 (64-bit) (2.6.39-300.26.1.el5uek)
5. mutlipath enabled
6. kernel created with (mkinitrd -v -f --with=sd-mod with=dm-multipath /boot/initrd-2.6.39-300.06.1.el5uek.img $(uname -r))
Below is part of the log file.
Did you have the idea what cause the issue?
Regards,
CL
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: Linux version 2.6.39-300.26.1.el5uek ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)) #1 SMP Thu Jan 3 18:31:38 PST 2013
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: Command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/lun_osp3 rhgb quiet numa=off
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009a400 (usable)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000000009a400 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000007df4c000 (usable)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000007df4c000 - 000000007df89000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000007df89000 - 000000007e01c000 (ACPI data)
Nov 1 11:03:04 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000007e01c000 - 000000007e240000 (ACPI NVS)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000007e240000 - 000000007f34c000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost cpuspeed: Enabling ondemand cpu frequency scaling governor
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 000000007f34c000 - 000000007f800000 (ACPI NVS)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000080000000 - 0000000090000000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000fed1c000 - 00000000fed40000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
Nov 1 11:03:05 localhost kernel: BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000006080000000 (usable)
Nov 1 11:03:06 localhost kernel: NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
Nov 1 11:03:06 localhost kernel: SMBIOS 2.7 present.
Nov 1 11:03:06 localhost rpc.statd[5742]: Version 1.0.9 Starting
Nov 1 11:03:06 localhost kernel: No AGP bridge found
Nov 1 11:03:06 localhost kernel: last_pfn = 0x6080000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost hcid[5810]: Bluetooth HCI daemon
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost hcid[5810]: Register path:/org/bluez fallback:1
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost sdpd[5814]: Bluetooth SDP daemon
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: total RAM covered: 393216M
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 9   lose cover RAM: 0G
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: last_pfn = 0x7df4c max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost pcscd: pcscdaemon.c:507:main() pcsc-lite 1.4.4 daemon ready.
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: found SMP MP-table at [ffff8800000fdb60] fdb60
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: Using GB pages for direct mapping
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-000000007df4c000
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-0000006080000000
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost pcscd: hotplug_libusb.c:402:HPEstablishUSBNotifications() Driver ifd-egate.bundle does not support IFD_GENERATE_HOTPLUG. Using active polling instead.
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost pcscd: hotplug_libusb.c:411:HPEstablishUSBNotifications() Polling forced every 1 second(s)
Nov 1 11:03:07 localhost kernel: RAMDISK: 3795a000 - 37ff0000
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: RSDP 00000000000f0490 00024 (v02 ACRSYS)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: XSDT 000000007dfa6090 0009C (v01 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 AMI 00010013)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: FACP 000000007dfafb10 000F4 (v04 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 AMI 00010013)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: DSDT 000000007dfa61b8 09956 (v02 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000000 INTL 20091112)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: FACS 000000007e23df80 00040
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: APIC 000000007dfafc08 00224 (v03 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 AMI 00010013)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: FPDT 000000007dfafe30 00044 (v01 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 AMI 00010013)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: SRAT 000000007dfafe78 004B0 (v01 A M I AMI SRAT 00000001 AMI. 00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: SLIT 000000007dfb0328 00030 (v01 A M I AMI SLIT 00000000 AMI. 00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: HPET 000000007dfb0358 00038 (v01 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 AMI. 00000005)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: PRAD 000000007dfb0390 000BE (v02 PRADID PRADTID 00000001 MSFT 04000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: SPMI 000000007dfb0450 00040 (v05 A M I   OEMSPMI 00000000 AMI. 00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: SSDT 000000007dfb0490 6B344 (v02 INTEL    CpuPm 00004000 INTL 20091112)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: EINJ 000000007e01b7d8 00130 (v01    AMI AMI EINJ 00000000      00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: ERST 000000007e01b908 00230 (v01 AMIER AMI ERST 00000000      00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: HEST 000000007e01bb38 000A8 (v01    AMI AMI HEST 00000000      00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: BERT 000000007e01bbe0 00030 (v01    AMI AMI BERT 00000000      00000000)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: DMAR 000000007e01bc10 00178 (v01 A M I   OEMDMAR 00000001 INTL 00000001)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: ACPI: MCFG 000000007e01bd88 0003C (v01 ACRSYS ACRPRDCT 00000001 MSFT 00000097)
Nov 1 11:03:08 localhost kernel: NUMA turned off
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel: Faking a node at 0000000000000000-0000006080000000
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel: Initmem setup node 0 0000000000000000-0000006080000000
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:   NODE_DATA [000000607ffd9000 - 000000607fffffff]
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel: Zone PFN ranges:
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:   DMA      0x00000010 -> 0x00001000
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:   DMA32    0x00001000 -> 0x00100000
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:   Normal   0x00100000 -> 0x06080000
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel: Movable zone start PFN for each node
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel: early_node_map[3] active PFN ranges
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:     0: 0x00000010 -> 0x0000009a
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:     0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0007df4c
Nov 1 11:03:09 localhost kernel:     0: 0x00100000 -> 0x06080000
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x408
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x04] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x06] lapic_id[0x06] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x08] lapic_id[0x08] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0a] lapic_id[0x0a] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0c] lapic_id[0x0c] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0e] lapic_id[0x0e] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x10] lapic_id[0x20] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x12] lapic_id[0x22] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x14] lapic_id[0x24] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x16] lapic_id[0x26] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:10 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x18] lapic_id[0x28] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1a] lapic_id[0x2a] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1c] lapic_id[0x2c] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1e] lapic_id[0x2e] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x03] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:11 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x05] lapic_id[0x05] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x07] lapic_id[0x07] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x09] lapic_id[0x09] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0b] lapic_id[0x0b] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0d] lapic_id[0x0d] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0f] lapic_id[0x0f] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:12 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x11] lapic_id[0x21] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x13] lapic_id[0x23] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x15] lapic_id[0x25] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x17] lapic_id[0x27] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x19] lapic_id[0x29] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1b] lapic_id[0x2b] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1d] lapic_id[0x2d] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x1f] lapic_id[0x2f] enabled)
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x04] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x06] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x08] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0a] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0c] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0e] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x10] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:13 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x12] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x14] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x16] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x18] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1a] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1c] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1e] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x05] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x07] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x09] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0b] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0d] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x0f] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x11] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x13] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x15] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x17] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:14 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x19] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1b] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1d] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x1f] high edge lint[0x1])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost hidd[5960]: Bluetooth HID daemon
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x00] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 0, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[24])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec01000, GSI 24-47
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x03] address[0xfec40000] gsi_base[48])
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 3, version 32, address 0xfec40000, GSI 48-71
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a701 base: 0xfed00000
Nov 1 11:03:15 localhost kernel: SMP: Allowing 32 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009a000 - 000000000009b000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000000009b000 - 00000000000a0000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000a0000 - 00000000000e0000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007df4c000 - 000000007df89000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007df89000 - 000000007e01c000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007e01c000 - 000000007e240000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007e240000 - 000000007f34c000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007f34c000 - 000000007f800000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 000000007f800000 - 0000000080000000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 0000000080000000 - 0000000090000000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 0000000090000000 - 00000000fed1c000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000fed1c000 - 00000000fed40000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000fed40000 - 00000000ff000000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: PM: Registered nosave memory: 00000000ff000000 - 0000000100000000
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost automount[5994]: lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locate nis+ table auto.master
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: Allocating PCI resources starting at 90000000 (gap: 90000000:6ed1c000)
Nov 1 11:03:16 localhost kernel: Booting paravirtualized kernel on bare hardware
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:4096 nr_cpumask_bits:32 nr_cpu_ids:32 nr_node_ids:1
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: PERCPU: Embedded 26 pages/cpu @ffff88607f200000 s77440 r8192 d20864 u131072
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 99271377
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: Policy zone: Normal
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/lun_osp3 rhgb quiet numa=off
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: xsave/xrstor: enabled xstate_bv 0x7, cntxt size 0x340
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: Checking aperture...
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: No AGP bridge found
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: Queued invalidation will be enabled to support x2apic and Intr-remapping.
Nov 1 11:03:17 localhost kernel: BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:5e13c2e
Nov 1 11:03:18 localhost kernel: page:ffffea0149452a10 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:          (null) index:0x0
Nov 1 11:03:18 localhost kernel: page flags: 0x20000000000080(slab)
Nov 1 11:03:18 localhost kernel: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-300.26.1.el5uek #1
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff811147dd>] bad_page+0x9d/0x120
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost gpm[6080]: *** info [startup.c(95)]:
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff81114923>] free_pages_prepare+0xc3/0x100
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost gpm[6080]: Started gpm successfully. Entered daemon mode.
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff81118a82>] __free_pages_ok+0x32/0xf0
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff81118b60>] __free_pages+0x20/0x30
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff815045b6>] __free_pages_bootmem+0x66/0x90
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819f13c1>] __free_pages_memory+0x101/0x170
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819f1487>] free_all_memory_core_early+0x57/0x70
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff81514605>] ? bad_to_user+0x76f/0x76f
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost avahi-daemon[6171]: Found user 'avahi' (UID 70) and group 'avahi' (GID 70).
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819e41a7>] numa_free_all_bootmem+0x87/0xa0
Nov 1 11:03:19 localhost avahi-daemon[6171]: Successfully dropped root privileges.
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819e227b>] mem_init+0x3b/0x110
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost avahi-daemon[6171]: avahi-daemon 0.6.16 starting up.
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819c4140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost avahi-daemon[6171]: WARNING: No NSS support for mDNS detected, consider installing nss-mdns!
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819c4140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819c4779>] mm_init+0x9/0x20
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost avahi-daemon[6171]: Successfully called chroot().
Nov 1 11:03:20 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff819c4ec5>] start_kernel+0x145/0x390

It could be a hardware issue. I suggest to run Memtest. You can download a free stand-alone disk image, which you can burn to CD from here:
http://www.memtest86.com/download.htm
Then burn the iso disk image and restart the computer from the appropriate media. Be sure to follow the instructions of your CD/DVD software to properly burn .ISO images. There is plenty of info on the web.

Change Status of archived document after approval process

hi how can we change the status of an archived document in KM after it has gone thru the approval process.
the reason once we archive we cannot resubmit the document for approval.
thanks

Hi Venu,
have a look under System Administration - System Configuration -- Knowledge Management -- Configuration --Content Management -- User Interface -- Commands -- UI Command Groups -- StatemanagementGroup.
See Java class: com.sapportals.wcm.rendering.uicommand.cm.UIStatemanagementGroupCommand. Take the class and decompile this and everything needed around to understand how this class works.
Then you can choose to extend this CommandGroup to also have a command "Resubmit for Approval" or you can implement your own UI Command only for resubmitting (you will also have to activate your command (group) by settings within the configuration).
On the other hand, if all this is completely new to you, I'm a bit sceptical if the task isn't a bit too big as a first task on KM implementation topics...?
Hope it helps
Detlev

Approval process in OIM 11g

Hi All,
I am newbie to OIM. I have a requirement with 2 levels of approvals in OIM 11g.
*1st level:* In the first level the Approver will be selected by the user(self service) from the drop down present in the custom UI.
*2nd level:* For the 2nd level Approval the 1st level appover should have the ability to select the next approver from a drop down list. The 2nd level approvers belong to a particular group.
All the approvers should be stored in a lookup table in OIM. When a user raises a request the custom application should get the values from the lookup table and populate the drop down for 1st level approvers. 2nd level approvers sholud be populated in the drop down during the 1st level approval process.
can any one suggest me the steps to achieve this.
Thanks

Task assignment in SOA are done via human task assignment i.e. the .task component in BPEL. Now this task assignment can use various features to compute whom to assign the task to.
1. Static: This is when you specify the group name or the user name directly into the task.
2. Dynamic : This is when you assign the approver to be a variable and in your SOA workflow before task assignment you assign value to this variable.
3. External Routing: This is when you assign a java code inside the .task to do all the assignment and escalations. When using this you can have complex implementations done.
What I meant by looping is that you will need to call this .task two times, first time of the first approver and second time (if the first approves it) for the second approver. Thus when you are inside the loop you need to get the appropriate value from the payload (payload is sent from OIM to SOA when you submit/approve the request) and set it into the appropriate variable so that .task reads that variable and assigns the task to that person.
I would recommend going through the BPEL developers guide for better understanding. Start with a simple process and see how it behaves when it runs and then pile on top of it.
-Bikash

"Ask to buy" and "Sign in to Approve" process is not working

Last weekend I setup Family Sharing for the first time, but the "Ask to buy" and "Sign in to Approve" process is not working. I am the Family Organizer and I created an account for my child under 13 with "Ask to buy" enabled. My child can go in to the App Store, click "Buy" for a desired app and I get a notification on my iPhone 5s... as expected. When I open the Notification I have the option to Decline or Approve. If I select Approve, a box pops up asking me to enter the password for my child's iCloud account to complete the request. (It seems odd to me that I'd have to enter his password instead of my own, but whatever.) So I enter his password and the box goes away for a second and then comes right back like I typed it wrong or something. I enter it again and again and always the same box comes back and the request is never completed. We've tried this several times over several days and always see the same behavior. I have also tried entering my password instead of his (since that makes more sense to me) but I encounter the same problem.
I have verified that I am signed in to my iCloud account and my iTunes account on my iPhone 5s. I have also verified that my son is logged in with his iCloud/iTunes account on his iPod touch, so why isn't this working? Additionally, if I disable "Ask to Buy" then I can successfully install apps on his iPod from the iPod itself.
Is it normal for the "Sign in to Approve" box to show his iCloud address instead of mine? And if so, why doesn't it complete when I enter his password? Am I missing something completely? This is driving me crazy.

Hi ,
When you click your link "Click here", the SharePoint web page with anchor will not work until refresh the page, if it's the case, you can add the javascript code to refresh the page automatically as workaround per the following similar post.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f7eab808-da8a-44fd-9933-f9b992f5affc/sharepoint-anchor-tags?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
http://yalla.itgroove.net/2012/05/anchor-links-tags-in-sharepoint-2010/
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout(Reload,2000);
function Reload()
window.location.hash=self.document.location.hash.substring(1);
</script>
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Page group approval process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for