Page load time differences between IE and Firefox

Hello all,
I have a problem with page loading time in IE 8. My page contains tabular form, classic report and some other items. I use some javascript code(placed in HTLM Header section) and also dynamic actions. When I try to display the page in IE I have to wait for 40 seconds (100 rows in tabular form). I realized that the performance is dependent on the number of displayed rows in the tabular form. But decrease the number of visible rows, using pagination, is not an option, because all needed rows should be visible for the users. During the tests I have tried to remove all the JS code and disable all the dynamic action, but the loading time was more or less the same.
When I try to run the same page in FireFox then it is displayed in 4 seconds!
I have already try to search some tips or advices how to speed up the page loading, but only what I have found out is, that every web browser is different. The javascript is handled differently, page rendering is done differently and so on.
Maybe there is something what I have missed, and you experts can help me. Is there anything general what I should check or change to speed up the loading time in IE?
Thanks in advance!
Jiri
APEX v. 4.2.1.00.08
IE 8.0.7600.16358
FF 19.0.2

Thanks Denes for your reply.
I use HttpWatch tool to measure the loading times. Reports are mostly the same for IE and FF. I can see from the report, there is three times shown error 404 Not Found for the items below.
http://......./images/sRegion-Body.png
http://......./images/sRegion-Bottom.png
http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png
The last action which caused 404 error started 2 seconds after the page was asked to refresh. The next action http://......../i/libraries/jquery-ui/1.8.22/ui/i18n/oracle/jquery.ui.datepicker-cs.js started after 38 seconds (hanging in the same place for 36 seconds). Does it mean that the problem is caused by http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png action which returns 404 error?
How can I add the missing images?
-Jiri

Similar Messages

What's the difference between Mozilla and Firefox

what's the difference between MOZILLA and FIREFOX?

Firefox doesn't include the SeaMonkey suite.<br />
SeaMonkey is a separate program (not just a browser, but a suite) maintained outside the Mozilla Corporation.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey
<blockquote>SeaMonkey is a free and open source[3] cross-platform Internet suite.<br />
It is the continuation of the former Mozilla Application Suite, based on the same source code.<br />
<br />
The development of SeaMonkey is community-driven, in contrast to the Mozilla Application Suite, which until its last released version (1.7.13) was governed by the Mozilla Foundation. The new project-leading group is the SeaMonkey Council.
</blockquote>

Is there an ON LOAD difference between IE and Firefox?

I am experiencing a problem where a page does one thing in IE and something different in Firefox. Just wondering if anyone knows if this is normal behaviour or not.
I have an ApEx page which is building a dynamic AJAX hierarchy tree based on the example outlined in Carl Backstrom's MacDaddy Example apex.oracle.com site (http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=11933:49). As I click down the tree, each node is a hyperlink which takes me to a detail page about that node. I have an onload process on the Hierarchy Tree page which attempts to traverse down the tree to the node which I was "last at" when I was last on the page. This is so that when I am on the detail page of a node, I can click the "Back" button on the browser to navigate back to the Hierarchy Tree page and be presented with the "view" of the tree as when I left.
When I click the "Back" button to navigate back to the Hierarchy Tree page, the ONLOAD javascript code runs in IE, but not in Firefox. This has been verified by adding a simple "alert" function to the ONLOAD. The "alert" does not appear in Firefox when navigating back, but does in IE. By the way... when I initially navigate to the Hierarchy Tree page, the "alert" shows up in both IE and Firefox. It's the navigation BACK to the page where it doesn't show up in Firefox.
First of all, is this normal functionality? Meaning, when you use the Back button on the browser, is the ONLOAD code suppose to be run or does it only run when you navigate TO a page (not BACK TO a page)?
Secondly, is this normal functionality within ApEx? Is the ApEx environment doing anything in the background to screw up IE or Firefox from doing or not doing the ONLOAD code when navigating back to my Hierarchy Tree page?

Please stop posting with your off-topic link.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"seomax" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:g7es1a$hhi$[email protected]..
> wht is different between IE and firefox browser, and how
to implement css
> option(if related option exists) in firefox to see
appropriate
> output(which is
> not showing in firefox), wil not it mend ever? or is
there any solution
> for it?
> lots of people asked this question suggestion
appreciated.
>

Web Gallery-Surprising Differences between Safari and Firefox

I discovered some surprising differences using Web Gallery in Safari vs. Firefox:
1. When you first view an album the gallery, the thumbnail photos take quite a bit longer to be visible in Safari than in Firefox.
2. When rolling the mouse over the Subscribe icon in Safari, a message states, "Add this album to iPhoto." In Firefox, the message states, "Subscribe to an RSS feed of this album."
3. When a movie is selected in Safari, you can download it immediately, though the movie is not playable from the Safari page until it fully loads. In Firefox, if you click the download icon before the movie has fully loaded, a message appears that states, "QuickTime is unable to play this movie. Please try again. Then, a window opens asking what to do with the file you are trying to download -- Save it, or Launch QuickTime. If you wait until the movie is fully loaded, it plays within the Firefox page. If, after it's loaded, you leave the page and then go back to that page, the movie won't load again and play within Firefox, but it can be downloaded.
I'm wondering whether these differences in functionality are typical or just occurring on my Mac, so please document your experience here.

Thanks Denes for your reply.
I use HttpWatch tool to measure the loading times. Reports are mostly the same for IE and FF. I can see from the report, there is three times shown error 404 Not Found for the items below.
http://......./images/sRegion-Body.png
http://......./images/sRegion-Bottom.png
http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png
The last action which caused 404 error started 2 seconds after the page was asked to refresh. The next action http://......../i/libraries/jquery-ui/1.8.22/ui/i18n/oracle/jquery.ui.datepicker-cs.js started after 38 seconds (hanging in the same place for 36 seconds). Does it mean that the problem is caused by http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png action which returns 404 error?
How can I add the missing images?
-Jiri

What is the difference between aurora and firefox browsers?

What is the difference between Firefox 9 and Aurora? Which one performs better?

The Aurora builds are for testing code for future Firefox version. The Nightly builds (currently Firefox 12) always get the latest changes and patches first and such changes bubble down to other Firefox versions with a delay of about six weeks, first to the Aurora channel (currently Firefox 11) and then another 6 weeks later to the Beta channel (currently Firefox 10) that then gets the next release (Beta goes to release at the end of January). Normal users should always stay on the release channel.
*http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_pre-release_versions

Time differences between camera and iMovie

Hi,
When I import footage from my Mini-DV camera into iMovie I am seeing a difference between the time displayed on the tape and time displayed in iMovie. The camera says 48 seconds while iMovie says 44 seconds. I thought that it might be related to the framerate of the video in iMovie, but I have changed this to 25 fps which matches the video camera and am still seeing a different time. The framerate needs to be perfect as the footage is going to be shown side-by-side with a animated graph which builds with time.
Does anyone have any idea what could cause this time difference?
Thanks

< scratching head > we had something about a NTSC/PAL issue.. hmm.. ?
if possible, open an existing PAL project (window titles says DV-PAL), save it under a diff. name, import into that project, delete the not wanted parts..
another option is, quit iMovie, delete ~/Library/Preferences any com.apple.iMovie.plist file.. relaunch iM.. that 'resets' iM... sometimes, it starts to stumble..

Execution time difference between Statspack and DBM_Monitor trace

Hi Everyone,
We noticed that output of query execution time is quite differ between statspack and session tracing (DBMS_MONITOR) report. The query execution time in Statspack was 1402 sec and in session trace file was 312.25 Sec. FYI database version is 11.2.0.3 which is installed on platform OL 5.8
Both of the following reports (Staspack/tracing) was executed on same system and at the same time. Could you suggest why execution time is differ in staspack and session tracing?
Staspack execution time :-
Elapsed Elap per CPU Old
Time (s) Executions Exec (s) %Total Time (s) Physical Reads Hash Value
1402.50 1 1402.50 9.1 53.92 256,142 3247794574
select * from ( select * from ( select resourcecontentslocati
on,isprotocolname,ismimecontenttype,indexedmetatext,objectid,met
atext,valueaddxml,resourcetype,resourceviewedtime,iscmaresultid,
resourcelastviewedbyuser,issequencenumber,nvl(length(contents),0
Session tracing time:-
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 10.58 256.44 43364 153091 0 0
Execute 1 0.01 0.08 0 0 0 0
Fetch 143 2.09 55.72 25440 32978 0 1000
total 145 12.69 312.25 68804 186069 0 1000
Thanks
Rajdeep

Hi,
First of all, please read the [url https://wikis.oracle.com/display/Forums/Forums+FAQ]FAQ page and find out how to use the code tags to format your output properly so that it's readable.
I don't want to work out the stats formatting but I'd guess that if you ran the query first time and the data was not cached, it would be slower than the 2nd query when it was cached. The stats should confirm this so please format them so we can see it properly.
Rob

Configuration Fails - Time Difference Between SA and SSO

I know this is going to be a light-bulb moment for me but I haven't been able to figure it out yet. I'm configuring SA and at the vCenter SSO credentials page. I put in the credentials and get the following error:
Installation aborted - could not authenticate to vCenter Single Sign On due to time difference. Please synchronize the clocks of Support Assistant Virtual Appliance and vCenter Single Sign-On server and retry the operation.
I changed the timezone for the SA appliance to match that of our vCenter server and I'm still getting that error. I noticed that the time is off by 7 hours on the appliance so I tried to trick it by setting the timezone to somewhere in Europe (which then showed the same time as vCenter), but it still failed. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Here is what I have found to critical touch point when it comes to time and VAs
-: If you have AD.... ensure that the PDC\DC is pointing to a NTP source
w32tm /config /manualpeerlist:<fqdn or IP ntp server> /reliable:yes /update
-: ALL your ESXi server MUST have a NTP...make sure its the same at the AD PDC\DC. The ESXi server may take 10mins to 15mins
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2012069
-: Configure NTP on the VA

Time difference between iPhone and iMac

I have both iPhone and iMac set to the same time zone and time. However, whatever iCal entries I make, there is a 9 hour difference between the two (iPhone being 9 hours behinf iMac).. Obviously, I am missing some setup somewhere but I truly cannot figure it out.

Sorry for hasty posting. Deep in the setup, under Mail, Contacts, Calendar, the Calendar was set to Cupertino and I am in Prague. That is why, stupid me ...

Time difference between physical and logical standby

Hi,
I have just been tasked on getting some info and setting up dataguard for some users for read-only/reporting purpose.
The 3 questions I am being asked are:
1. What is the time difference in applying changes from primary to physical standby compare to logical standby
2. What is the overhead maintenance of having a standby database?
3.What latency is involved?
I will be glad to have your input on this.
Thanks

Hi,
Physical Standy where its a read only DB.
Logs are applied.
Logical Standy where it can be Read / Write DB and the logs are applied in terms of SQL Statements.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan Kumar N

Time differences between ical and iphone

When syncing ical to iphone i have a time difference of 9 hours. (dates on the iphone are always 9 hours earlier) No matter on which device the entry was made.
Time zone is set to Berlin, Germany on my iphone as well as on my G5.
Same thing is happening when syncing the iphone with my google calendar.
Any suggestions?

A restore of my iphone solved my problem.

Response time difference between copy and original

I have make an export of my database like that :
EXP system/manager@mybase owner=myowner file=exp_mybase_myowner.dmp
and an import in new session (on same server):
IMP system/manager@mybase2 full=y file=exp_mybase_myowner.dmp
To increase performance of my two databases, i have drop all indexs and recreate them.
But, response time is significantly different between databases.
How can i solve this problem ?

1. Analyze all the tables that are used in your query by using command:
Analyze table <table_name> compute statistics;
You can alsp use package DBMS_STATS.GATHER_DATABASE_STATS to calculate the statistics for all object in DB.
2. Have you checked the DB_BLOCK_SIZE for both the DB? Is it same? Command "SHOW PARAMETER DB_BLOCK
4. Is the SGA size same for both the DB? Command "SHOW SGA"
3. Was there sufficient RAM to create the SGA? I hope you are not using SWAP space for the SGA

Loading time differences between Flex1 Flex2 ?

hi all,
we have upgraded our Portal system up to 7.01 SP5 . now all our Visual Composer Modells will be compiled with Flex2 and they are so painfull slow. first the initilizing phase took much more longer then Flex1 compiled modells. if this phase is finished, i see my layout but till i can use it, it tooks another 15-30 seconds.
we also use the "optimize for speed" option in VC but nothing happens. we also tried to enable and disable the Option "enable flex controls for portal theme". same result painfull slow.
the same Modell is 10 times faster in Flex1 then the Flex2 compiled one.
is there any workaround to get it faster ?
thx for your help
Tony Wienhold
UPDATE:
i made a small check on the iexplorer.exe in taskmanager when he is loading the modell.
the system makes crazy stuff with the iexplorer process. 50%CPU ussage, seems to me OK, but it takes 50 sec for the whole loading. IE is frozen at this time and he blows up the MEM Usage for the process from 150000 MB up to 1150000 MB .
what is he doing ? 1GB Mem usage more ? can someone confirm this behavior ?
after these 50 sec only the layout is fully loaded. not till then i can start to enter some variables or something like that.
Edited by: Tony W on Nov 20, 2009 5:02 PM

any idea's ?

I use firefox 3.6.1 on a mac os 10.5.8. What is the difference between this and firefox 6?

As I mentioned, I am running 3.6.1 and am when I go to the firefox website I get the message that I am using an old version and am asked to update to the latest which appears to be 6.0. Is this an update to 3.6.1? When researching on the web, I see that 6 is an update to version 5. So, is the update for me or is it a different version altogether?
Thanks

Yes, 6.0 is an update for 3.6.1. The 3.6.x versions were followed by 4.0 in March 2011, then 5.0 in June which was an update for 4.0, and 6.0 an update for 5.0 in August.
Mozilla moved Firefox to a fast release system this past spring, quicker releases with fewer changes per release. Instead of users having to wait for a new feature to be added in 10 to 14 months under the old release system, a new feature is added to a release like 12 weeks after the new feature is deemed to be complete and ready for release.

One hour time difference between Palm and Exchange calendar items

Calendar items on Exchange and Palm are off by one hour.
Exchange server, desktop PC and Palm are all set to PST with the same time. Versamail account on Palm has been deleted and rebuilt.
See screen shots at http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/kPKBDS28rhdVsextLM1PPQ?feat=directlink
What is interesting is the appointments entered in Outlook show up on the Palm one hour early however they show the correct time in (parenthises) so the Palm seems to be somewhat aware of the problem.
This same issue occurs on different Palm T/X 's with different Outlook accounts.
Any suggestions are welcome
Post relates to: Palm TX
This question was solved.
View Solution.

You need this update:
http://www.palm.com/cgi-bin/cso_kbURL.cgi?ID=9306
Download
DSTUpdater.zip (0.01MB)
Double-click the downloaded file to decompress it. Your computer will unzip the file to a folder containing several individual files.
Message Edited by IrreducibleM31 on 03-26-2009 05:12 PM

Page load time differences between IE and Firefox

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for