Pages displayed in wrong order when in two-up

Hello,
Lately I have run into a curious problem with certain PDF-files (papers from Systems Engineering Journal). When displayed in two-up layout the first page is displayed on the right hand, and the second page on the left, like this:
2 1
4 3
6 5
If displayed two-up (continuous) with cover page the first page (cover) is displayed on the left hand, but after that it is the same pattern as above. When shown as single pages the pages are in the right order.
System: Same behaviour in Acrobat Reader X (v.10.1.1), and Acrobat 9.4.4 Pro. Win 7 Enterprise, SP1.
I realize this could be due to some error in the files themself since they are form the same souce, but is there any way around this?
Best regards,
J

Thank you, it worked! It took some time to find though. I kept trying to change the "Reading order" under the Reading-tab. Didn't realize there were both a Reading order, and a Reading direction-option.
Thank you!

Similar Messages

Mail app displays the wrong Inbox when you open it.

This problem can be easily reproduced if you have more than one email account configured in iOS 4.x
It should be extremely simple to fix with the next update. I see that this same problem has been mentioned before, but I couldn't update that thread because it's "archived." If you want Apple to fix this, please report the issue to Apple using one or more of the links below:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipodtouch.html
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html
http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html (not sure if iPad Mail app is affected)
Here's what I submitted...
Subject:
Simple software design issue in Mail app.
Feedback Type:
Design/Ease of Use
Comments:
Thanks for your work on making iOS better and better with each update! There is no option to provide general iOS feedback, so I'll submit this under "iPhone" and "iPod." I'm currently using the latest iOS (4.3.1).
The native Mail app in iOS has had the Unified Inbox feature since iOS 4.0, which is very useful. However, there is a minor design flaw that could be easily resolved with a software update.
My setup:
I have 3 Exchange accounts on my device (Hotmail, Gmail[Default], Work). The Hotmail Inbox is empty at least 98% of the time because my Gmail account periodically downloads the messages. The only reason I have the Hotmail account entered on my device is to make sure I can see a message in "All Inboxes" even before my Google account retrieves it. On my device, the Gmail account is set as default for Mail and Contacts.
The problem:
I never intentionally select the Inbox for the Hotmail account because it should almost always be empty. I would simply view "All Inboxes." Still, half the time I open the Mail app, it shows the empty Hotmail Inbox. This is very annoying!
I finally figured out how to reproduce it consistently:
(must have more than one account configured)
1) Launch the Mail app and back-up to the screen that shows the list of accounts / Inboxes (I usually try to leave it here when I'm done, hoping to see that screen the next time I open Mail).
2) Without selecting a specific account or Inbox, push the Home button to exit the Mail app.
3) Kill the Mail process from the multi-tasking menu.
4) Open Mail again
Mail will show whichever Inbox comes immediately after "All Inboxes", even if it's not your default account. In my case, it starts in the empty Hotmail Inbox every time...a folder that I never intentionally select. Each time, I have to go back to the list and tap "All Inboxes."
So, if I leave Mail on the root screen before killing the process, it consistently displays the wrong Inbox the next time I open it. If I select an Inbox or "All Inboxes," it will remember that selection and show me that screen the next time I open Mail.
What it should do:
When Mail doesn't know which Inbox to display, it should...
A. Start on the root screen with the list of accounts and Inboxes (preferred option).
or B. Start in "All Inboxes" (secondary preference).
or C. Start in the Inbox of the default account (not preferred, but better than showing an empty/unused Inbox).
Thank you!
Message was edited by: Ichinisan
(not sure if iPad Mail app is affected)
Message was edited by: Ichinisan
Message was edited by: Ichinisan

Try this...
Launch the Mail app.
Navigate to the "Mailboxes" page (the page that lists all of your accounts).
Tap "Edit" in the top right corner.
Scroll down to the bottom section of the page, titled "ACCOUNTS".
Drag the triple-bars on the right to reorder the accounts listed. The first account listed will be the one that the app launches to.
Hope this helps, I went crazy trying to figure that out and it worked for me.

Table of Contents displays in wrong order

I created and generated a Table of Contents, and am having a weird issue.   It's a 19-page document, and Table of Contents is set to display Headings 1 and 2. Everything went fine, except that on one page the Heading 1 on top of the page displays in the Table of Contents below the Heading 1 level below it - i.e., they're in the wrong order!
So, on the page its -
9       Text
10     Text
But on the Table of Contents it returns -
10     Text
9       Text
Any ideas about why it might be doing this?

It can't be! If "9. Text" and "10. Text" use the same list for auto-numbering and "10" is below "9" on the same page, Indesign can't generate such, unless you don't copy the numbering to the TOC and instead add numbering via TOC style. Check your TOC style settings.

My home page displays the wrong day in my sport section.

My home page is Yahoo. I have a section on the homepage that is set up for my sport teams. The days displayed for date of play are wrong. The category displays the college teams day as Friday, but the date of play is Saturday. This day is displayed next to the teams name correctly. I have tried to get help from yahoo, but I get no answer and I do not get a support help e-mail address. Thank You, Norman Crawford ([email protected])

Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
* Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Offline Storage (Cache): "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
* Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"

CD's play in wrong order when loaded to iPhone

Hi everyone
I have a number of personal development audio cd's that I am loading into iTunes and then transferring to my iPhone. These CD sets need to be listened to in a specific order.
Each CD loads fine and when I click on Get Info, each has the correct disc number allocated to it. They have the same artist and specific album names.
So, when I load CD's 1 through 4 onto iTunes, all is good, when I transfer them to my iPhone and Get Info, the same info has come across, but instead of playing 1, 2, 3, 4, they are playing 1, 4, 2, 3. This is also the order they are listed in, when I search in Music via Artist on my phone.
What am I doing wrong here, as I want them to play in the correct order?
Thanks for reading

http://indesignsecrets.com/stacking-order-bug-exporting-interactive-pdf.php

One page displays as negative image when saving PDF to reduced size in Preview

Imac Intel Mid 2007
OS X 10.5.8
Preview v4.2
I have a multi-page PDF I'm trying to save to a reduced size.
The document was constructed of separate pages, some of which were created as Photoshop PDFs in Photoshop CS4 and others were saved as PDF's from Word. After moving over the individual PDF's to the side bar, the document saves fine in Preview at full size. When I use the quartz filter to "Save As" "Reduced File Size" one page saves as a negative image and the others are all fine.
One suggestion I saw in a similar thread was that the mode in PS might be CMYK, however it is not and it is RGB.
Any help as to solving this would be greatly appreciated.

n.gilbert wrote:
If I select all pages 'save as' will only save out one page and not all.
JPEG is single-page.
If I print and choose 'pdf to jpeg'
Elaborate, please.
Is there a way to save to pages out in one go to jpeg where I can adjust the dpi setting?
Yes. Build an Automator workflow using the PDFs > Render PDF Pages as Images action.
Once I have the reduced jpegs it's easy enough to reimport into preview and save as a pdf.
If the desired final output is multi-page PDF, no need to go through all that. You can do the task in Acrobat Pro (PDF Optimizer), or in Preview (Save as > PDF > Quartz Filter). If the current Reduce File Size filter doesn't provide satisfactory quality, use ColorSync Utility to duplicate it (or make a new filter from scratch) and adjust it to fit your needs.

Wrong time when adding two dates

Hi
I'm trying to add two Date-objects by adding milliseconds they represent, and convert back to a Date-object. More specific, I have a Date representing midnight on a given day, and another Date representing a time offset on this day, and I want to get a Date representing the time and date on one.
I have made the following example code:
        Calendar c1 = Calendar.getInstance();
        Calendar c2 = Calendar.getInstance();
        c1.set(2009, Calendar.MARCH, 24, 0, 0, 0);
        c1.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        c2.set(1970, 0, 1, 11, 38, 0);
        c2.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        long m1 = c1.getTimeInMillis();
        long m2 = c2.getTimeInMillis();
        Date test = new Date(m1);
        Date test2 = new Date(m2);
        Date test3 = new Date(m1 + m2);
        System.out.println(test);
        System.out.println(test2);
        System.out.println(test3);Which outputs
Tue Mar 24 00:00:00 CET 2009
Thu Jan 01 11:38:00 CET 1970
Tue Mar 24 10:38:00 CET 2009The result is an hour wrong!? What am I doing wrong? I suspect it's a timezone issue of some kind, but I don't understand why timezone is an issue in this case?
Ulrik

usden wrote:
Yawmark, that is not correct in my opinion.Maybe this will help shed some light on it for you, then: import java.util.*;
public class Foo {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        Calendar c1 = Calendar.getInstance();
        Calendar c2 = Calendar.getInstance();
        Calendar c3 = new GregorianCalendar(2009, Calendar.MARCH, 24, 11, 38, 0);
        c1.set(2009, Calendar.MARCH, 24, 0, 0, 0);
        c1.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        c2.set(1970, 0, 1, 11, 38, 0);
        c2.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        long m1 = c1.getTimeInMillis();
        long m2 = c2.getTimeInMillis();
        long m3 = c3.getTimeInMillis();
        System.out.println(m1);
        System.out.println(m2);
        System.out.println(m3);       // what you expect.
        System.out.println(m1 + m2); // what you get.
I still don't understand, why this is not working.Time zones. Example:import java.util.*;
public class Foo {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        Calendar c1 = Calendar.getInstance();
        Calendar c2 = Calendar.getInstance();
        Calendar c3 = new GregorianCalendar(2009, Calendar.MARCH, 24, 11, 38, 0);
        TimeZone tz = TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT");
        c1.setTimeZone(tz);
        c2.setTimeZone(tz);
        c3.setTimeZone(tz);
        c1.set(2009, Calendar.MARCH, 24, 0, 0, 0);
        c1.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        c2.set(1970, 0, 1, 11, 38, 0);
        c2.set(Calendar.MILLISECOND, 0);
        long m1 = c1.getTimeInMillis();
        long m2 = c2.getTimeInMillis();
        long m3 = c3.getTimeInMillis();
        System.out.println(m1);
        System.out.println(m2);
        System.out.println(m3 + " expected");       // what you expect.
        System.out.println(m1 + m2 + " actual"); // what you get.
        System.out.println(new Date(m1 + m2));
        System.out.println(new Date(m3));
}~

FCP export EDL with wrong TC when got two M2 (exp. dissolve) from same Reel

I got the problem when export EDL from FCP6. In the event that got 2 clips from same Reel dissolve together. The EDL generate wrong TC for M2. for example
039 R005 V C 05:12:57:15 05:12:59:02 01:01:48:20 01:01:50:07
039 R005 V D 008 05:19:03:17 05:19:05:07 01:01:50:07 01:01:51:21
* EFFECT NAME: PUSH
* FROM CLIP NAME: BUDDYR5-2.MOV
* TO CLIP NAME: BUDDYR5-2.MOV
M2 R005 024.0 05:12:57:15
M2 R005 048.0 05:12:57:15
064 R019 V C 19:12:36:22 19:12:38:20 01:02:33:14 01:02:35:12
064 R019 V D 052 19:12:39:08 19:12:42:03 01:02:35:12 01:02:38:07
* EFFECT NAME: CROSS DISSOLVE
* FROM CLIP NAME: BUDDYR19-1.MOV
* TO CLIP NAME: BUDDYR19-1.MOV
* CLIP FILTER: SEPIA
M2 R019 024.0 19:12:36:22
M2 R019 012.0 19:12:36:22
066 R019 V C 19:10:45:10 19:10:45:10 01:02:40:00 01:02:40:00
066 R018 V D 030 18:06:08:12 18:06:10:01 01:02:40:00 01:02:41:13
* EFFECT NAME: CROSS DISSOLVE
* FROM CLIP NAME: BUDDYR19-1.MOV
* CLIP FILTER: SEPIA
* TO CLIP NAME: BUDDYR18-1.MOV
M2 R019 012.0 19:10:45:10
M2 R018 012.0 18:06:08:12
The correct one should like event 066.
If someone know the solution for this problem, please help. Thank you.

EDLS's are designed for linear online suites. Linear online suites cannot do a dissolve from the same source reel without laying off one of the shots to another tape or using something called preread. I imagine this is the source of the problem.
Message was edited by: Michael Grenadier

How to Display values in order when Multiple values are selected in the Parameter List

HiI have a report which runs on the parameter(SalesPersonName) selected. Report has a group section where for each SalesPersonName we have different actions(Lead,Prospect,Active and so on) he had performed which is the basis for the group.Now if i need multiple Value selection in the parameter,which i am able to acheive but the order in which it gets printed is not the right one.I want intially all the actions performed by one sales person printed and then the second one should start.Can any one help me in this aspect.Thanks in advance

If I understand your report structure correctly - you have one Grouping on Actions. So could you not add another grouping on SalesPersonName above the Actions grouping that you currently have?So the new structure would be:G1 - SalesPersonNameG2 - Actions (current grouping you have) Whether or not you suppress or don't suppress the new grouping is your choice, but it will then force the ordering that you are asking about (assuming I understood)

Tables of View Joined in Wrong Order When View Joined to Other Tables

I have the following view:
select
     distinct
     'PKG' item_type_code,
     msibk.organization_id,
     msibk.inventory_item_id
from
     mtl_system_items_b_kfv msibk,
     mtl_item_categories mic,
     mtl_default_category_sets mdcs,
     mtl_categories_b_kfv mcbk
where
     msibk.organization_id = mic.organization_id
     and msibk.inventory_item_id = mic.inventory_item_id
     and mic.category_set_id = mdcs.category_set_id
     --1 Inventory (Lookup = MTL_FUNCTIONAL_AREAS)
     and mdcs.functional_area_id = 1
     and mic.category_id = mcbk.category_id
     and mcbk.segment1 = 'EXP'
     and mcbk.segment2 in ( 'PACKAGING' )When I access the columns like this:
select
from
     xxcus_mtl_sys_item_types_v
where
     organization_id = :1
     and inventory_item_id = :2
     and item_type_code = :3It correctly accesses MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B second in the explain plan and everything is good.
But when it is part of a join, it accesses MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B last in the explain plan and has performance issues.
select
     msi.segment1
from
     xxcus_mtl_sys_item_types_v x,
     mtl_system_items msi
where
     msi.organization_id = x.organization_id
     and msi.inventory_item_id = x.inventory_item_id
     and x.item_type_code = 'PAK'Any ideas why the view tables are getting joined incorrectly when the view is joined with another table?
Thanks,
Kurz

The query I posted for the view is just an excerpt. It is several nearly identical queries with UNION ALL between them. I get the same results when I have only one query in the view.
Here is the explain plan for the first query:
| Id | Operation                          | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                   |                              |     5 |   160 |    25 (20)|
|   1 | VIEW                              | XXCUS_MTL_SYS_ITEM_TYPES_V   |     5 |   160 |    25 (20)|
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                        |                              |       |       |            |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE NOSORT              |                              |     1 |    71 |     5 (20)|
|* 4 |     FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |     1 |    71 |     4   (0)|
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |     1 |    36 |     3   (0)|
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)|
|   8 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 9 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 10 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
|* 11 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN            | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1       |     1 |    19 |     2   (0)|
|* 12 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     1   (0)|
|* 13 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1          |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
| 14 |    SORT UNIQUE NOSORT              |                              |     1 |    63 |     5 (20)|
|* 15 |     FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 16 |      NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |     1 |    63 |     4   (0)|
| 17 |       NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |     1 |    36 |     3   (0)|
| 18 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)|
| 19 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 20 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 21 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
|* 22 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN            | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1       |     1 |    19 |     2   (0)|
|* 23 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    27 |     1   (0)|
|* 24 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1          |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
| 25 |    SORT UNIQUE NOSORT              |                              |     1 |    71 |     5 (20)|
|* 26 |     FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 27 |      NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |     1 |    71 |     4   (0)|
| 28 |       NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |     1 |    36 |     3   (0)|
| 29 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)|
| 30 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 31 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 32 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
|* 33 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN            | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1       |     1 |    19 |     2   (0)|
|* 34 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     1   (0)|
|* 35 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1          |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
| 36 |    SORT UNIQUE NOSORT              |                              |     1 |    71 |     5 (20)|
|* 37 |     FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 38 |      NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |     1 |    71 |     4   (0)|
| 39 |       NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |     1 |    36 |     3   (0)|
| 40 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)|
| 41 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 42 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 43 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
|* 44 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN            | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1       |     1 |    19 |     2   (0)|
|* 45 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     1   (0)|
|* 46 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1          |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
| 47 |    SORT UNIQUE NOSORT              |                              |     1 |    71 |     5 (20)|
|* 48 |     FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 49 |      NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |     1 |    71 |     4   (0)|
| 50 |       NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |     1 |    36 |     3   (0)|
| 51 |        NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    17 |     1   (0)|
| 52 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 53 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 54 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN          | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
|* 55 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN            | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_U1       |     1 |    19 |     2   (0)|
|* 56 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     1   (0)|
|* 57 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_U1          |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Here is the explain plan for the second query:
| Id | Operation                           | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                    |                              |     5 |   240 |    10 (50)|
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     5 |   240 |    10 (50)|
|   2 |   VIEW                              | XXCUS_MTL_SYS_ITEM_TYPES_V   |     5 |   160 |     5 (100)|
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                        |                              |       |       |            |
|   4 |     HASH UNIQUE                     |                              |     1 |    71 |     1 (100)|
|* 5 |      FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |    17 | 1207 |    77   (0)|
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |    16 |   992 |    77   (0)|
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    43 |     7   (0)|
|   9 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 10 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 11 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     6   (0)|
|* 12 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN          | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_N1          |    44 |       |     2   (0)|
|* 13 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES          |    49 |   931 |    70   (0)|
|* 14 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN           | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3       |   441 |       |     4   (0)|
|* 15 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
| 16 |     HASH UNIQUE                     |                              |     1 |    63 |     1 (100)|
|* 17 |      FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 18 |       NESTED LOOPS                  |                              | 2158 |   132K|   250   (1)|
| 19 |        NESTED LOOPS                 |                              | 2134 |   112K|   249   (0)|
| 20 |         NESTED LOOPS                |                              |    44 | 1540 |     7   (0)|
| 21 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 22 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
| 23 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |    44 | 1188 |     6   (0)|
|* 24 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN          | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_N1          |    44 |       |     2   (0)|
|* 25 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES          |    49 |   931 |    70   (0)|
|* 26 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN           | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3       |   441 |       |     4   (0)|
|* 27 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
| 28 |     HASH UNIQUE                     |                              |     1 |    71 |     1 (100)|
|* 29 |      FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 30 |       NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |    33 | 2343 |    77   (0)|
| 31 |        NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |    33 | 2046 |    77   (0)|
| 32 |         NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    43 |     7   (0)|
| 33 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 34 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 35 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     6   (0)|
|* 36 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN          | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_N1          |    44 |       |     2   (0)|
|* 37 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES          |    49 |   931 |    70   (0)|
|* 38 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN           | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3       |   441 |       |     4   (0)|
|* 39 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
| 40 |     HASH UNIQUE                     |                              |     1 |    71 |     1 (100)|
|* 41 |      FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 42 |       NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |    17 | 1207 |    77   (0)|
| 43 |        NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |    16 |   992 |    77   (0)|
| 44 |         NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    43 |     7   (0)|
| 45 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 46 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 47 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     6   (0)|
|* 48 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN          | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_N1          |    44 |       |     2   (0)|
|* 49 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES          |    49 |   931 |    70   (0)|
|* 50 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN           | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3       |   441 |       |     4   (0)|
|* 51 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
| 52 |     HASH UNIQUE                     |                              |     1 |    71 |     1 (100)|
|* 53 |      FILTER                         |                              |       |       |            |
| 54 |       NESTED LOOPS                  |                              |    17 | 1207 |    77   (0)|
| 55 |        NESTED LOOPS                 |                              |    16 |   992 |    77   (0)|
| 56 |         NESTED LOOPS                |                              |     1 |    43 |     7   (0)|
| 57 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS    |     1 |     8 |     1   (0)|
|* 58 |           INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | MTL_DEFAULT_CATEGORY_SETS_U1 |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
|* 59 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MTL_CATEGORIES_B             |     1 |    35 |     6   (0)|
|* 60 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN          | MTL_CATEGORIES_B_N1          |    44 |       |     2   (0)|
|* 61 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES          |    49 |   931 |    70   (0)|
|* 62 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN           | MTL_ITEM_CATEGORIES_N3       |   441 |       |     4   (0)|
|* 63 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN            | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |     9 |     0   (0)|
| 64 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID       | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B           |     1 |    16 |     1   (0)|
|* 65 |    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                | MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B_U1        |     1 |       |     0   (0)|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indesign - Wrong order of pages when printing

Hello
I'm using Adobe Indesign CS4. Recently i decided to make my first "booklet". There are 80 pages - mixed text and images. When I try to print it as booklet I have problem with the order of the pages. After the page 26 or so it starts to print the pages in wrong order.When I have smaller booklet about 15 pages long the order is correct and I have no problems.
What could cause this problem? I would be really greatful as I have spent almost 4 hours trying to figure this out without any results :/
Thank you in advance and regards

The thing is that in Preview everything seems to be correct , pages 1 and 80 etc are beside each other.
Right now I have turned all the settings concerning printing Blank Pages and problem still occurs.
To be exact, i have made document 80 pages long, containing only numbers of pages on the bottom right corner.
I have set to print booklet (I use HP Laserjet P2015).
Up to page 6 everything is correct, but then there is a blank page and the numeration is 8 , next page is number 7 , next number 10 and next numer 9. It is totally messed up.

XML Parsing attributes with encoded ampersand causes wrong order

Hi all,
I am writing in the forum first (because it could be that i am doing something wrong.... but i think it is a bug. Nonetheless, i thought i'd write my problem up here first.
I am using Java 6, and this has been reproduced on both windows and linux.
java version "1.6.0_03"
Problem:
read XML file into org.w3c.dom.Document.
XML File has some attributes which contain ampersand. These are escaped as (i think) is prescribed by the rule of XML. For example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <lang>
 <text dna="8233" ro="chisturi de plex coroid (>=1.5 mm)" it="Cisti del plesso corioideo(>=1.5mm)" tr="Koroıd pleksus kisti (>=1.5 mm)" pt_br="Cisto do plexo coróide (>=1,5 mm)" de="Choroidplexus Zyste (>=1,5 mm)" el="Κύστει&sigmaf; χοροειδού&sigmaf; πλέγματο&sigmaf; (>= 1.5 mm)" zh_cn="脉络膜囊肿（>= 1.5 mm）" pt="Quisto do plexo coroideu (>=1,5 mm)" bg="Киста на хориоидния плексус (>= 1.5 mm)" fr="Kystes du plexus choroide (>= 1,5 mm)" en="Choroid plexus cysts (>=1.5 mm)" ru="кисты сосудистых сплетений (>=1.5 mm)" es="Quiste del plexo coroideo (>=1.5 mm)" ja="脈絡膜嚢胞（>=1.5mm）" nl="Plexus choroidus cyste (>= 1,5 mm)" />
</lang>As you might understand, we need to have the fixed text '>' for later processing. (not the greater than symbol '>' but the escaped version of it).
Therefore, I escape the ampersand (encode?) and leave the rest of the text as is. And so my > becomes >
All ok?
Symptom:
in fetching attributes, for example by the getAttribute("en") type call, the wrong attribute values are fetched.
Not only that, if i only read to Document instance, and write back to file, the attributes are shown mixed up.
eg:
dna: 8233, ro=chisturi de plex coroid (>=1.5 mm), en=кисты сосудистых сплетений (>=1, de=Choroidplexus Zyste (>=1,5 mm)Here you can see that 'en' is shown holding what looks like greek, ... (what is ru as a country-code anyway?) where it should have obviously had the english text that originally was associated with the attribute 'en'
This seems very strange and unexpected to me. I would have thought that in escaping (encoding) the ampersand, i have fulfilled all requirements of me, and that should be that.
There is also no error that seems to occur.... we simply get the wrong order when fetching attributes.
Am I doing something wrong? Or is this a bug that should be submitted?
Kind Regards, and thanks to all responders/readers.
Sean
p.s. previously I had not been escaping the ampersand. This meant that I lost my ampersand in fetching attributes, AND the attribute order was ALSO WRONG!
In fact, the wrong order was what led me to read about how to correctly encode ampersand at all. I had been hoping that correctly encoding would fix the order problem, but it didn't.
Edited by: svaens on Mar 31, 2008 6:21 AM

Hi kdgregory ,
Firstly, sorry if there has been a misunderstanding on my part. If i did not reply to the question you raised, I appologise.
In this 'reply' I hope not to risk further misunderstanding, and have simply given the most basic example which will cause the problem I am talking about, as well as short instructions on what XML to remove to make the problem disappear.
Secondly, as this page seems to be displayed in ISO 8859-1, this is the reason the xml I have posted looks garbled. The xml is UTF-8. I have provided a link to the example xml file for the sample below
[example xml file UTF-8|http://sean.freeshell.org/java/less2.xml]
As for your most recent questions:
Is it specified as an entity? To my knowledge (so far as my understanding of what an entity is) , yes, I am including entities in my xml. In my below example, the entities are the code for the greater than symbol. I am under the understanding that this is allowed in XML ??
Is it an actual literal character (0xA0)? No, I am specifying 'greater than' entity (code?) in order to include the actual symbol in the end result. I am encoding it in form 'ampersand', 'g character', 't character', 'colon' in order for it to work, according to information I have read on various web pages. A quick google search will show you where I got such information from, example website: https://studio.tellme.com/general/xmlprimer.html
Here is my sample program. It is longer than the one you kindly provided only because it prints out all attributes of the element it looks for. To use it, only change the name of the file it loads.
I have given the xml code seperately so it can be easily copied and saved to file.
Results you can expect from running this small test example?
1. a mixed up list of attributes where attribute node name no longer matches its assigned attribute values (not for all attributes, but some).
2. removing the attribute bg from the 'text' element will reduce most of these symptoms, but not all. Removing another attribute from the element will most likely make the end result look normal again.
3. No exception is thrown by the presence of non xml characters.
IMPORTANT!!! I have only just (unfortunately) noticed what this page does to my unicode characters... all the the international characters get turned into funny codes when previewed and viewed on this page.
Whereas the only codes I am explicitly including in this XML is the greater than symbol. The rest were international characters.
Perhaps that is the problem?
Perhaps there is an international characters problem?
I am quite sure that these characters are all UTF-8 because when I open up this xml file in firefox, It displays correctly, and in checking the character encoding, firefox reports UTF-8.
In order to provide an un-garbled xml file, I will provide it at this link:
link to xml file: [http://sean.freeshell.org/java/less2.xml]
Again, sorry for any hassle and/or delay with my reply, or poor reply. I did not mean to waste anyones time.
It will be appreciated however if an answer can be found for this problem. Chiefly,
1. Is this a bug?
2. Is the XML correct? (if not, then all those websites i've been reading are giving false information? )
Kindest Regards,
Sean
import javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory;
import org.w3c.dom.Document;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;
import org.w3c.dom.NamedNodeMap;
import org.w3c.dom.Node;
import org.w3c.dom.NodeList;
import org.xml.sax.InputSource;
public class Example
 public static void main(String[] argv)
 try
 FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream("/home/sean/Desktop/chris/less2.xml");
 Document doc = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance()
 .newDocumentBuilder()
 .parse(new InputSource(fis));
 Element root = doc.getDocumentElement();
 NodeList textnodes = root.getElementsByTagName("text");
 int len = textnodes.getLength();
 int index = 0;
 int attindex = 0;
 int attrlen = 0;
 NamedNodeMap attrs = null;
 while (index<len)
 Element te = (Element)textnodes.item(index);
 attrs = te.getAttributes();
 attrlen = attrs.getLength();
 attindex = 0;
 Node node = null;
 while (attindex<attrlen)
 node = attrs.item(attindex);
 System.out.println("attr: "+node.getNodeName()+ " is shown holding value: " + node.getNodeValue());
 attindex++;
 index++;
 System.out.println("-------------");
 fis.close();
 catch(Exception e)
 System.out.println("we've had an exception, type "+ e);
} [example xml file|http://sean.freeshell.org/java/less2.xml]
FOR THE XML, Please see link above, as it is UTF-8, and this page is not. Edited by: svaens on Apr 7, 2008 7:03 AM
Edited by: svaens on Apr 7, 2008 7:23 AM
Edited by: svaens on Apr 7, 2008 7:37 AM
Edited by: svaens on Apr 7, 2008 7:41 AM

Songs displaying out of order in new iTunes

Despite proper track numbers on all the songs, tracks still display out of order when viewing them. Here is an album where the proper track numbers are showing but each song is in a completely random order. Note that shuffle is not enabled.
I've attempted to fix this by adjusting settings in the View menu and clicking and dragging. Nothing helps.
Any tips would be very much appriciated.

Hey Kilima,
THANK YOU! The problem was that some of the songs were labeled as "Album 1 of 1" while other songs had this information completely missing. This didn't affect the track listings in the old iTunes, but got distorted when I upgraded.
Thanks again!
Dann

Goods issue document is not displaying in production order

Hi Gurus, I am having problem That when I am doing goods issue in MB1A t code the document is posting but it is not displaying in production order.but when I am doing same goods issue in MIGO the document is displaying in Production order.when I am doing same goods issue in another plant with MB1A the document is showing.so where is the problem??is there any setting with plant and T code combination??what exactly is the error??why it is not showing in particular t code in particular plant.Please guide me.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Check in transaction OPL8 for the combination of plant and order type..is the below indicator are activated or not...
Thanks
Kumar

On certain news web sites, the front page displays ok, but click on a story, it displays and then I get the popup file not found.

On the Boston Globe web page, for example, their home page displays just fine. When I click on any news title, the page displays for an instant and then this pops up:
File not found
Firefox can't find the file at jar:file:///C:/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/chrome/en-US.jar!/locale/browser-region/region.propertieswd.sharethis.com.
* Check the file name for capitalization or other typing errors.
* Check to see if the file was moved, renamed or deleted.
I click on the "Try Again" button and nothing happens.

Vuze installs ask.com's tool bar also. Check for a Vuze plug in. Thanks for the fix.

Pages displayed in wrong order when in two-up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for