Pallet putaway strategy question

Dear all,
I am new in the pallet putaway strategy and need your experience advise if you have done this.
Question.
1 - To use the pallet putaway strategy (i.e. P), do I need to configure the Storage Bin Type search (i.e. spro > logistics execution > wm > strategies > activate storage bin type search)?? Is it compulsory?
2 - To use the pallet putaway strategy, the storage type MUST BE a SUT-managed and that the "SUT check activate" checkbox MUST Checked, am I correct?
thanks
Tuff

Hi,
the storage bin type search and the storage unit type check more or less is the same. You have to define storage unit types, storage bin types, assign which SUT goes into which SBT. Well, and then you activate the check.
You need to do this for the pallet strategy. You do NOT need to activate the storage unit management in a storage type with the pallet strategy.
Best regards
Juergen

Similar Messages

  • Pallet Putaway Strategy

    Hello All,
    I think the main advantage of having Pallet Putaway is that we  can
    manage several quants in one storage bin without having mixed storage.
    i.e., through bin sectioning.
    But when I have pallet strategy and have my storage type without
    Mixed storage active, system is not allowing that. If this is not happening
    then whats the purpose of sectioning bin when already we have the
    segregation at Quant level. Please guide on this.
    Thanks and regards,
    Milton Isaac

    Hi
    I am not sure I understand the issue
    If you want pallet storage I would expect this to be because you want to have one pallet in one bin
    If this is not the case then maybe you could try 'C' which is open storage
    Also if you want to have multiple items in one bin then surely you would select Mixed storage allowed
    I hope that this helps
    Frenchy

  • Putaway strategy for mixed pallets

    Hi guys,
    I need your suggestion to determine the correct putaway strategy. This is the scenario: We have a rack which will stock mixed pallets (more than one material) in the same bin. We want the same behavior of the putaway strategy I u201CAddition to existing stocku201D. In order to control the capacity of the bins Iu2019ve configure the Capacity check method 4 u201CUsage check based on materialu201D and try to control the capacity by volume, however, this measure is not realistic because in a pallet exist a lot of space that will not be consume by the material (in this case, books).
    Example:
    1 Pallet = 1.000 CM3
    1 Book = 1 CM3
    Consume of material = 1
    Bin capacity = 1000
    In this case, de capacity check will let stock 1.000 UN of material in the bin, but the true is that one pallet could only contain 700 UN.
    I try to get the consume materialu2019s amount dividing the bin capacity by the total quantity of a pallet (Consume of material = 1000 / 700) but this could only works for NOT mixed palletsu2026
    A possible solution is the Pallet strategy, but I have the same error. You define the pallet quantity at material level, so I have the same problem for the mixed pallets. Can I indicate the system which materials will go together before the TO creation?
    Any suggestion will be really appreciated!
    Sebas

    Hi Hein
    yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
    but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
    what you think about   putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy.   if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT  permitted .  And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
    your opnion please.
    thanks & best regards
    Thomas

  • Putaway strategy for rack storage and floor

    HI
    we have define one warehouse room as One Storage Type. its rack storage . Storage unit
    managed . in each storage bin one Su (pallet) can be placed. Some times we keep stocks (on pallets) on the floor
    (Pallets in one layer). No of Pallets(SU) is defined at that floor, say 100 pallets can be placed on the floor.
    we need Capacity check method = 2 (Check based on palletization accord. to SUT 1).
    Which Putaway strategy should be applied for this storage type.? considering 1 bin = 1 pallet and Pallets on the floor.
    thanks & regards
    thomas

    Hi Hein
    yes, creating seperate storage type for racking and floor is a solution.
    but if we want to keep it as whole room as One Storage type.
    what you think about   putaway strategy "P" Pallet putaway strategy.   if we consider floor as speerate BIN TYPE and define BIN TYPE and SUT  permitted .  And Allowed SU in that BIN TYPE.
    your opnion please.
    thanks & best regards
    Thomas

  • SAP WM: Mixed pallet with putaway strategy "P"

    Dear Experts,
    I am using putaway strategy P for a storage type and I have given X for Mixed storage field.
    I am not able to put multiple batches of same material in one bin, is it possible with putaway strategy P
    I am not using SU management.
    Thanks in advance,
    Amit Kumar

    This is from a WM colleague:
    First it will always look at same bin as a material is stored
    with put away strategy “I”. 
    This scenario is completely wrong, if I understand it right.
    He/she needs to look at the bin strategy for the SU types
    defined in the LE qty. / SUT types for bin type.
    Strategy “I” is for addition to stock like they said.
    Capacity check 2 only works if it is SUT active, which they say it is
    not.  Not the check flag, but the SUT.
    The strategy for SUT type allowed to bin type only works if it
    is SUT managed, which they say it is not.
    The strategy just doesn’t seem right.  If they do not use
    SU’s, the only capacity check that works is max from the material master (WM-1
    view) weight “1”.
    The bin type / SUT strategy will not work unless they are using
    SUT’s for storage.  Not just the LE qty. in the SUT defined.
    If they aren’t using SUTs for storage, it is only a quant.
    Noting is configurable for strategy of quant to storage bin type.

  • Addn to stock flag for putaway strategy not working

    Hi
    It seems that the flag “Addn to stock” for putaway strategy “ “  in the storage type 103 configuration is not working fine as the quantities of the same material with the same batch sent to the same stype 103, and destination bin are not being added. So by running stock report in WM we see several lines with partial quantities instead of only one line with the total quantity in place. Do anybody know how can that be solved? Or what can be the route cause of the issue? Is there any OSS known applicable to fix the problem?
    Thx for your help
    Alba

    Hi Guys
    Unfortunately I do not think that you will get an answer now. Either your question is not simple or we do not know.
    So in the interest of keeping the Forum tidy and easier to surf through could you please close your thread and wither try one of the other forums or try another post. I do not think that mosy people will bother to look this far back anymore.
    Sorry I cannot help as I would if I could.
    Regards
    Frenchy.

  • Putaway Strategy P - Managing different SU types

    Hi gurus,
    I'm experiencing the following problem.
    Using the putaway strategy Pallet, the system processes different storage unit types and allocates them to the appropriate section, but only the same storage unit types can be placed into a storage bin at one time.
    My need is to place at the same time different SU types into a storage bin. Is it possible?
    Thank for your help!
    Francesca

    Hi
    The storage unit is compatible with the current block when the 'maximum
    storage units' which can be stored in the bin are the same. The
    'maximum storage units' depends on the storage unit type of the first
    storage unit you put it the bin. If the values of T337B-MAXLE are
    different then the system will not allow the placement. This is the
    is the standard behaviour.
    Field LAGP-MAXLE indicates the maximum number of Storage Units that are
    allowed to be placed into a bin and this is set during the first
    placement into an empty bin in accordance with the block stucture
    definition in transaction OMM4.
    This does not mean that it is not possible to place different Storage
    Unit Types in to the bin. This is possible but only when the block
    structure definition in OMM4 has an identical value for the maximum
    number of storage units in the block (T337B-MAXLE). If one has a value
    of 20 and the other has a value of 10 then the system correctly issues
    error L3 425.
    regards,
    Ramana

  • Putaway strategy 'Q' Dynamic quant

    Hi,
    We have an issue with the internal movement of stock from a storage type that does not allow partial quantity picking.
    Scenario: The Putaway strategy for the St type has been configured as 'Q' and picking strategy as 'F'. The available stock in the bin/quant is say 1000 Boxes. I have created a transfer order to pick only 600 boxes. when i confirm the transfer order system is confirming the full 1000 boxes rather than picking only partial qty. Full stock removal has not been activated for this St type in config.
    We would like to know if this is something to do with the st type with Q config(like does Q allows picking of complete quant only?).
    if anyone has faced this issue earlier would be great to get some hints.
    Thanks,
    Harish

    For our movement type over deliveries are allowed. Below is my observation:
    1. when we transfer stock from bulk storage type system allowing us to confirm part pallet using mvt type say 9**.
    2. when we transfer stock from dynamic quant number then system does not allow us to confirm part pallet but confirms full pallet only and this is using the same mvt type 9**.
    we are using same movement type for transfer of stock from both these storage type onto a staging area which is a interim location but system is behaving differently for these two scenarios.
    I am not sure if standard SAP has made dynamic quant storage type to allow withdrawal of full pallet only and needs help if someone has faced similar issue.
    Best Regards,
    Harish

  • Putaway strategy problem

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a requirement  relevant to putaway:,
    My client is using all pallets  just joining them together in the warehouse and material placed on mixed basis. when ever the
    material comes they find the empty space through out the warehouse and it will be placed. there is no pallet capacity and
    no markings, many pallets has joined together from one place to another place and they consider it as one bin. I have to define
    a putaway strategy for the same.
    If I use SUT strategy, there is no material specificity per bin and the qtty as per them, in bin many material will come with different shipping dimensions.
    Please give a suggestion for the same. your help will greatly appreciated.
    Thx in advance.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi
    You can try put away strategy B or C
    B is block storage and you can specify how many pallets can fit in and even how high you can stack them
    C is ope storage for which you can place as many pallets as you want
    I hope that this helps
    Frenchy

  • [WM] Putaway strategy for bulk storage type SU-managed

    Hi Gurus,
    I need your help
    I have a Bulk storage type with SU-managed. I would undestand the real behaviour of putaway strategy B.
    1)  Case 1: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
    - in bin XX1 there is material AAA
    - Bin XX2 is empty
    In this situation if i receive material AAA, putaway strategy B chooses the bin XX1 by background processing - correct!
    2) Case 2: assume that in bulk storage type there are the followed bins (rows):
    - In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
    - in Bin XX2 there is material AAA
    - in Bin XX3 there is material AAA
    In this situation if i receive material AAA, i don't undestand the behaviour of putaway strategy B. Seems that the system chooses in random way the bin (XX1, XX2 and XX3).
    P.S: the storage unit type is one of default - E1.
    Can you help me?
    Thank very much

    You told
    Addn to Stock: X
    Block upon placement: empty
    Then How can you have Case 2?
    In Bin XX1 there is material AAA
    Next time also stock goes to XX1 only not XX2 unless you overwrite manually.
    What does your block strage structure looks like? i'm sorry but i don't undestand your question.
    Go to OMM4 "Define-Block struct." and look No. SUs for your St. bin type, SUT & Bulk stor Ind.

  • Using ID Point for Repacking - no putaway strategy allowed

    Hi All,
    I have a business requirement to have an ID Point servicing inventory that is putaway to one specific storage type. HUM is active and when the goods are received at 902 they are potentially packed on a pallet. The pallet is moved to the ID point where it is unpacked and then put away.
    The systems allows configuration of only one repacking area per warehouse number where you can assign a fixed bin.
    Unfortunately the business do not want this activity happening at the normal repacking area (923) which is also used for other things so must remain configured.
    In order to perform repacking at the ID Point I must have no putaway strategy assigned to the storage type. Without the putaway strategy. how can I get the system to select a bin - any bin will do, either a fixed bin, a dynamic coordinate, it doesn't matter.
    I have a backup solution which to create a special movement indicator, new mvt type and enter the destination bin in the movement type, however I'm looking for something a little "nicer".
    Regards,
    Busaboy.

    Dear Karthik
    You are right, I did activated Indicator: Activate Storage Unit Type Check for Stock Placement in SPRO->LE->WM->Master Data->Define Storage Type
    The Indicator: Storage type with storage unit management was also ticked automatically by system when I selected Indicator: Activate Storaget Unit Type Check for Stock Placement.
    Are you trying to say the ID Port defined in Storage Type will have higher priority over the Storage Type value I maintained in the Storage Type Search Table?
    I have already maintained the Storage Bin and I still do not understand why system still go for ID port. As far as I know, system will suggest the Storage Type from ID Port ONLY if storage bin in this storage type as their destination are not maintained in first in the other setting.
    Quoted from SAP HELP
    Identification point for storage type
    Identification point (storage type) of the current storage type.
    All goods movements that do not have a specific storage bin in this storage type as their destination are first directed to the identification point.
    Here the goods are identified and a transfer order is generated for the actual transfer of the goods into the storage type concerned.
    Please help.
    Edited by: Daimos on Nov 4, 2011 3:25 AM

  • WM and Open storage putaway strategy

    Hi,
    the following link gives an explanation about Open storage putaway strategy
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/c6/f844694afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Strategy C: Open Storage
    Use
    The system uses this putaway strategy to find the storage bin in an open storage section. Open storage is a type of warehouse organization in which you define a single storage bin for a storage section. The quants in the storage bin can also be in the form of mixed storage.
    I think that in this strategy is also possible to define more than a single storage bin for a storage section.....or not?
    So why the statement: you define a single storage bin for a storage section.
    Best regards

    I cannot tell you why it is explained in this way, even the German explanation does not give any hint.
    Open storage putaway strategy is the most used in my implementations and I can confirm that you can have hundreds of bins in one storage section.

  • SAP WM Putaway strategy - Next empty bin

    Hello,
    I am testing putaway strategy - L - Next empty bin.
    I' ve created 902 - Storage type:
    Also i've been activated storage type search and storage section search:
    Then i've added this data to material master:
    And i also defined movement type- 101 for purchase orders:
    Also, special for this, i've created the empty bin:
    But when i am trying to post goods receipt in MIGO, i am getting the following error:
    Storage bin Z02   does not exist (check your entry)
    Message no. L9009
    Could you please advise - what is wrong - why i can't post the goods receipt in MIGO?
    Thank you in advance.

    Hello, Jürgen
    That's the settings for standard 101 wm mvmt type:
    That's setting for my 101 wm mvmt type:
    Difference - that i don't want to use dynamic storage bins.
    And i still have this error:
    Storage bin Z02 902  does not exist (check your entry)
    Message no. L9009
    Now system defines also storage type, because of i wrote it in the mvmt type, but i still can't understand, why it doesn't find storage bin, according the strategy.
    I think, that i 've made all necessary customizing settings and i also have one empty storage bin on this storage type and storage section.

  • LT10 "Immediate confirmation" of TO with Putaway strategy "C" Doesn't Work

    Hi ,
    We have WM with HU implemented for a Plant/ Sloc Combination.In Warehouse we have multiple storage types.
    Putaway strategy "C' (Open storage) is implemented with SU in one of the storage type of warehouse.
    If we try to make internal movement within this storage type using LT10 with option "Immediate Confirmation" (of TO) , it doesn't work and we have to use LT12 to confirm transfer order seperately.
    This is happening only if we are opting QUANT VIEW in LT10.If we use STORAGE UNIT view in LT10 and transfer the material with IMMEDIATE confrimation , TO gets confirmed immediately.
    Further , functionality of "Immediate confrimation" works perfectly if we use storage type with other put-away strategy like "NEXT EMPTY BIN"
    Need your immediate help on this
    Regards
    Sandeep Marwha

    Hi Sandeep,
    In open storage , you have only one bin per storage section. You are also having SU. So quant view will not work, thats why Storage unit view is working. Moreover, please check if mixed storage is enabled. If not then it will not allow multiple SU to accomodate. Thats where the Next empty bin will work.
    Thanks,
    Mono
    Edited by: Monodeep Sarker on Dec 28, 2010 8:46 PM

  • Bulk Putaway Strategy

    Hi,
    I have a query relating to the determination of bins for my bulk putaway strategy.
    On my bulk storage type I am using putaway strategy B (Bulk Storage) and mixed storage indicator C (several batches per bin only SU bulk storage)
    Having generated a putaway the system successfully denotes next empty bin until capacity as per the block structure under OMM4 is full. So far so good however it does not then allocate the remainder of the putaway to a bin where the same product is house although a different batch. (ie the error message below appears)
    System message L3  009
      No destination storage bin to be found in storage type 004
    However i can manually denote a bin where there is already the same material but with a different batch. The system then allows this entry.
    Does anybody understd why the system would not automatically select this bin which should be ok?
    Any ideas appreciated.
    many thanks,
    Adam.

    Must be a slow start to the year...too many Xmas ales...
    Solution: Set Level of Total Quant Count to 1
    Level of Total Quant Count
    The Total field is used for internal calculation of the total quant count for SU-managed bulk storage. This parameter influences both stock placements and stock removals.
    Stock Placement
    For putaways this parameter controls whether the system will automatically mix batches or not. If the parameter is set to "1" (batch neutral), the system looks for a storage bin where the material already exists. The batch number is not taken into consideration in this case. If the parameter is set to "2" (batch specific), the system looks for a storage bin where the batch of the material already exists and attempts to add the new stock to the existing stock. If that isnu2019t possible, the system looks for an empty storage bin.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Delay in the Inbound Idoc Posting Process

    Dear Friends, We have an scenario in the Inbound Idoc Posting Process, when we process the Idocs through the standard Inbound Program - RBDAPP01, we face the delay of 3hrs to 12 hrs, approx. When we try to re-process the same through the manual proce

  • IMEI based IP Pool assignment GGSN

    HI Expert .. I have following Query , Can we assign different IP address to the same apn request based on IMEI number , In other word: if request for "internet" apn come from Iphone handset/IMEI I want to assign to it an IP address from following poo

  • SLDCHECK fails for XI server - SLD on separate system

    Dear All, I have SLD configured on my solution manager system. All systems including XI are updating data in SLD -> Technical Systems. My problem When I execute SXMB_IFR, SLD web page opens up fine. But in transaction log is see following: Calling fu

  • Bad appointments in subscribed group calendar

    I've successfully gotten Leopard server running, with the appropriate services for my organization. Currently I'm testing it and seem to have found a slight problem. Adding events to a group calendar works like a charm, but when I subscribed to the g

  • Flash and IE 7/8 Issues

    Are there any known issues on PC or Mac with IE 7 or 8 allowing Flash elements to play, like movies or websites, and if so, what are the work arounds? I have a site we've built that the Flash movie appears in FF but not in IE. The IE screen appears w