Panel not resizing for high-resolution monitors

Received this in an email from a person using an HTML5 panel: "What I'm seeing on a high resolution monitor (3840x2160) is that the panel doesn't resize to fit its container."
The container for the panel is appears to have scaled up, but the panel itself is tiny within this container.
The pixel dimensions on which the panel was built (and what's coded into the HTML for the panel) makes the panel the correct size on "normal" monitors, but it doesn't appear to up rez for high-resolution monitors. The user can scale the rest of Photoshop's menus and panels using some interface in the OS, but the panel doesn't scale.
Anyone have any thoughts on this weather or not it's possible to get panels to up-rez for high-resolution monitors?
Thanks.

qsea wrote:
Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types. The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

Similar Messages

Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?

Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling for high resolution monitors in their preferences panel but Bridge CC does not, when will this feature be added to Bridge CC Adobe???

qsea wrote:
Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types. The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

Increase After Effects System text for high resolution monitor

I just purchased a high resolution monitor. The panels and system text (rendering queue, project panel, etc.) in After Effects is now just about microscopic.
Is there anyway to adjust the default text size on all the panels?

No, unfortunately not. This stuff is part of Adobe's specific UI libraries and cannot be changed. The main application menu should respect your settings though, as should file dialogs and a few text input fields, if that's any consolation. If possible, simply define a user preset in your graphics card settings that switches screeen resolution and system dpi when launching AE or any other Adobe app. Good monitors have good scaling chips, so it should not look all too shabby and you can always go back full res for pixel precision when needed...
Mylenium

Portege R930 - BSOD when connecting high resolution monitor to HDMI port

Hello.
I have the Portege R930 (pt331a-01w001) running window 7. Everything on the laptop works as expected, however when I plug the laptop into a high resolution monitor (2560x1440) via the HDMI port I get blue screen of death.
I can use the HDMI port to connect to my 1080p LCD TV and my work monitor which is a lower resolution and it works ok.
I have tried multiple cables and different monitors of the same resolution.
Can anyone assist?

Hello,
Yes that is correct. When my laptop is connected to a monitor with a lower resolution that 2560x1440 (such as my work monitor (1680x1050) or my TV (1080p)) everything works as expected.
Once I plug it into the 2560x1440 monitor I get BSOD.
The monitor only has a DVI-D Dual link port, so I am using a HDMI to DVI-D Dual link cable to connect the laptop HDMI port to the monitor.
I was getting this fault with the original display driver (not sure of the version), I then updated to the Toshiba driver (v8.15.10.2712) and also tried the Intel Driver (9.17.10.2932) and still get the same problem.

Can not get the high resolution photo from iCloud on the iPhone5s, unless re-share the photo to the iCloud.

after restoring the iPhone, the iPhone can not get the high resolution photo from album of iCloud, unless re-share all the photo to the iCloud.

If you plug up both to computer, open itunes, click "back up to computer" on both (not necessary for the one that's being transferred to) then on the one that's sending data click "back up" in the iTunes menu. It will then back up (if not already done in sync). Now plug up the second one (being transferred to) and on the iTunes menu, click "restore from backup" then choose the device you just backed up, and click "ok" or what it says.
Hope this helped
P.S. I am referencing to using iTunes <11. Some features I show here might not be available in iTunes 10

Got High resolution Monitor but everytnings too big

I just got a bigger monitor with higher resolution. For some reason, the block diagrams are screwed up. It seems like everything got bigger! What's the deal, and how do I fix it?
Thanks
LV 8.6 on Windoze XP

Go to the windows control for Display properties and select font size=normal.
You can also change the default diagram font for new VIs in LabVIEW, but it won't affect existing VIs. You would need to e.g. select all objects on the diagram and press "ctrl-" (control+minus) a few times to make the current fonts all smaller manually. I don't recommend this though.
Message Edited by altenbach on 02-08-2008 10:27 AM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
Attachments:
normalFont.png ‏34 KB

Make Skype work properly with Windows DPI scaling for high resolution displays

Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!

pokegwa wrote:
Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!It's been two years actually. As you can see Skype is really broken on HDPI displays and the issue is still being ignored/unacknowledged by Skype devs.

Resizing very high-resolution photos?

downsizing photos
i want to make a blurb book using photos professionally scanned at high resolution, 7351×4947 pixels at 5250ppi.
for the book i want to make they should print at 11.25" and not more than 300ppi.
when i downsize them (using image > image size) to that, they are still 21.9M, but are not supposed to be more than 10M.
what’s the best way to downsize them further without messing them up?

As Lundberg02 suggested, you might want to try resampling your image. You can do this by going to "Image > Image Size," and changing the Resolution option.

14" high-resolution monitor?

I am looking for a small monitor with a similar-size screen and resolution for my T60p but I'm unable to find a 14" monitor with a resolution any higher than 1024x768 (woefully inadequate anymore). It's difficult doing much at that resolution nowadays and the 15" I have takes up too much desk space (the 14" I found are twice as expensive).
Has anyone seen 14" monitors higher than that resolution ever? I've discovered SXGA (1280x1024) would be perfectly adequate (my T60p's 14" monitor is 1400x1050) but I don't understand why monitors at that size and resolution either don't exist are are so hard to find while millions of laptop monitors at that size and resolution were manufactured. Why wouldn't they make a same-size 2nd monitor for them? It's odd looking at a small screen and a supplemental large screen, and kind of unnecessary.

Hello,
It has been my observation that 8-10 years ago, laptops tended to come with higher resolution screens than comparable, standalone LCD monitors. I am guessing this was likely due to the high cost of the LCD screens.
Perhaps you could purchase a larger LCD monitor, with a stand that allows you to rotate the screen 90°. While the aspect ratio might seem a little odd (9:16, etc.) at first, this actually works quite well for some applications, such as web browsing, email and writing, where the screen more accurately mimics the geometry of a page in portrait mode.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
I am a volunteer and neither a Lenovo nor a Microsoft employee. • Dexter is a good dog • Dexter je dobrý pes
S230u (3347-4HU) • X220 (4286-CTO) • W510 (4318-CTO) • W530 (2441-4R3) • X100e (3508-CTO) • X120e (0596-CTO) • T61p (6459-CTO) • T43p (2678-H7U) • T42 (2378-R4U) • T23 (2648-LU7)
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Covers not resizing for thumbnail view

Hi,
How/when/where does the thumbnail png file for ADE get created? I have some epubs ebooks that are not displaying correctly. Instead of the cover being resized for the thumbnail, it is being cropped. On other books, however, it works fine. I can't see the difference in the actual html of the ebook. I did verify that it is the actual png file in the ADE thumbnails folder that is incorrect.
Help?

Not a problem with it sounding snippy. The key bit for you situation is was that it was rendering it at the thumbnail size (90x130, iirc), and as you found out it if your HTML was making some bad assumptions (usually in the size attributes for the image element) that it would be rendering in a larger viewport, that would be causing the cropping.
What I didn't know is if it was your authored content or not, because if it wasn't then the easier fix is to just replace the thumbnail image in the DE Thumbnails Directory.

Support for higher resolution on iPad?

I realise the latest 1.2 release increased the maximum resolution supported to 2048x2048 at the expense of the number of layers supported.
Are there any plans to extend this further, even if it only means supported say 4 layers? Most of my image editing apps (iPhoto, FilterStorm, Photogene etc.) can support my Nikon 12.2MP images without reduction and output at the full size so it seems this is still a limitation with Photoshop Touch which can only support a 3rd of this resolution.

AndyWhiteford wrote:
I'm fine with how Adobe hace approached this. My point is I have managed to edit full 12MP images on the iPad in these other apps and output at full size without any issues at all. I appreciate the image size will have a direct impact on the layers supported due to the limitations of available RAM but even if they limited it to 2 layers, you would at least have the choice of being able to edit these images in Photoshop Touch. Even if they disabled layers entirely for large images, it would still be a benefit being able to use this application to edit images as opposed to switching to different apps depending on the task at hand.
The point I'm trying to hammer home to anyone reading this is to realize the limitations tablets currently have. Sure, you might be OK with being only to edit a few layers when using a higher resolution but are others? Do they even know their tablets' specs? (I bet most don't even know the memory capacity their tablets have.)

Windows 7 will not allow a high resolution for my apple 30" monitor?

For some reason I cannot change the resolution on my 30" monitor as high as I can on my 23 inch monitor. This results in super big windows and font 4 times the size of the 23 inch monitor. My IT searched for a driver but could not find one. I used to use windows XP and he did find a driver for that. Anyone know where we can find the right driver to solve this problem. The video card is a Radion. My computer is a 3 year old Mac Pro..
Thanks in advance!
Mark

Recently I purchased an alienware M18 laptop installed with Windows 7 . I wanted to downlode the latest Itunes to this system as I have on other comptures I own. Itunes dowloaded and is accessible to a limited degree . What it will not do is provide access to the Itunes store. Something is blocking my access to the Itunes store and I have benn unable to determine what the obstruction might be.
If it's an alienware PC, plausibly you might be getting the Bigfoot networks variation of the problem described in the following document:
iTunes 10.5 for Windows: May see performance issues and blank iTunes Store
If it is the Bigfoot networks variation, stopping Xeno NIC from running at startup is worth a try, as per John's post here:
Re: Safari Not working at all! (Windows 7)

Resolution 1920x1080 not available for an external monitor

Hi,
I've just bought a Tv Lcd + Monitor 24 Samsung P2470hn, I have a DisplayPort to DVI adapter and a DVI to HDMI cable to the monitor. But when a I go to System Preferences -> Displays, I only have resolutions up to 1600x900. The monitor supports 1920x1080 but it isn't available. What I'm doing wrong? Could it be the DVI to HDMI cable? The monitor has a DVI input.
One weird thing is that when I go to System Profiler -> Graphics/Displays I see that the external monitor has this
SyncMaster:
Resolution: 1600 x 900 @ 60 Hz
Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
Main Display: Yes
Mirror: Off
Online: Yes
Rotation: Supported
Television: Yes
Note the last item "Television: Yes" could be that the problem? if so how can I change it?
Thanks
Gabriel

I find it very annoying that I have to use MiniDisplay Port to VGA to get 1366x768 or 1920x1080 resolution options in the Display Control Pane. If I use MiniDisplay Port to HDMI, I get some old common resolutions, (some weird ones too like 1344x1024) as well as 720p, 1080i, and 1080p. 1080p would be great, except this is more of a "TV" video input rather than a "PC" monitor input, I either get overscan or underscan (depending on the "Overscan" check box).
Why, especially since it's all digital with HDMI, doesn't Apple include nice 1:1 Pixel mapping using HDMI? It's very frustrating! I've noticed some, (generally more expensive HDTVs, like my 63" Samsung Plasma), HDTVs will do "Just Scan" (as opposed to "OverScan" or "UnderScan") then the 1080p with HDMI works beautifully.
All of my VIZIO TVs, I have to use the VGA to get 1:1 Pixel mapping. At least, with a high quality VGA cable (even my 25 foot one from MonoPrice.com that would cost 10 times more at a local store) does convert back to digital (for LCD panel) without noticeable noise and pixel shifting (or ghosting, which I've seen with cheap VGA cables, weird, seeing analog distortions on a digital LCD display, but hey, bad analog in -bad analog looking image out). Plus, unless you have the newest Macs with audio supported through the MiniDisplay Port, you can only get the TV speakers to work with the "PC" VGA input and the "PC" audio input (3.5mm stereo phono jack) next to it. With an HDMI input, the TV will look for audio in the HDMI source and not from the "PC" audio input.

Performance Lag for higher resolution

I have developed a touch based flash application with a resolution of 5120x1440.
There is performance lag in two areas.
1) FPS is low (below 33) and Graphic lag is high (sometimes hitting > 80 ms)
2) Touch response is slow (using touchlib)
I'm using a PC of the following specs.
CPU: Intel i7-4770 3.4GHz
RAM: Kingston 8GB
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z87X-OC
GPU: 4x Gigabyte Geforce GT630 2GB
PSU: 1000W
Currently, the GPU Load is hitting at most 20% and the CPU usage is most of time below 50%. If I keep invoking the touch events, the app will ocassionally freeze and GPU Load drops to 0% for a while before coming back to normal and app becomes responsive again.
Is there a hardware compatilbility issue? Is there any way to improve on the touch responsiveness?
Thanks...

If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
(the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
be able to sync things up.
This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
not work.
You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
another (expensive) pieces of software.

Flash for higher resolution displays

Newbie here (using CS3 Professional...just completed first
basic tutorial). I've been searching Adobe documents and this
forum, but haven't found an answer to my question. I'm wanting to
use flash for a tradeshow digital signage application and I need my
PC to output a flash movie at a resolution of 4080x768. An external
Matrox card will divide that resolution over three LCD flat-panel
displays. I learned that Flash's max stage size is 2880 pixels
either horizontal or vertical. Any workarounds? or is this even
do-able?
Thanks!

If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
(the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
be able to sync things up.
This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
not work.
You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
another (expensive) pieces of software.

Panel not resizing for high-resolution monitors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for