Panning multiple images simultaneously under 100% zoom

What is the magic key to hold down? I see it in all the demos but I can't find it in the manual(s) anywhere

perfect
Thank you!

Similar Messages

Can I search for multiple images simultaneously in Aperture?

Can I search for multiple images simultaneously in Aperture? For example, search for 'Image2.jpg, Image3.jpg, Image5.jpg' by image name, out of different folders?

dusan -- your best procedure is likely to be to type the first file name (without extension) in the search field of the Photos View, and then mark that file either with a Flag or a color label. (You might clear all Flags prior.) If you have a lot of images or a slow computer (or both ) you may have to wait a few seconds. Aperture will show "Loading ... " on the left side of the tool strip while it churns through your images.
Then hit backspace twice, and type "60". Mark the file found.
Repeat with variations.
Then go to Flagged view, or filter the whole Photos view for the color-label you used.

Show file size in Cell Extras? (Either Compact or Expanded, or anywhere in Grid for multiple images simultaneously)

I've searched and seen several suggestions saying to change Metadata to Exif & IPTC to see the file size, but that's for only one image at a time. Under Cell Extras (both Compact and Expanded) I see options for Megapixeps, Cropped Dimensions, File Name, Extention, and a bunch of other options, but no file size. I suspect this is because file size isn't a metadata field and simply a file attribute (that may be incorrect, but regardless...) is there really no way to have file size visible in the thumbnail cells in Grid view in the Library? I'm trying to reduce redundancy and viewing file size of multiple images at a glance based on my Library Filter criteria would be a huge help. Thanks to anyone who can help sort me out!

Sure. I have a catalog with 22,000 images indiscriminately imported from hundreds of folders and multiple drives from this year alone (partially lost a RAID array to a corrupt index and recovered a dump of the files so I'm terribly disorganized juggling emergency redundancy backups wherever I had 50 gigs here, 100 gigs there, and working to clean up and organize my photos one year at a time ), including raw, jpg, websized jpg, png, tiff and psd (flattened and with layers/adjustments) and am now trying to identify my keepers and delete unnecessary files. I have 22 terabytes of personal files and photography spread chaotically and while I now have proper discipline when saving variants, I didn't always and want to remove unneeded, rejected, and duplicate images. I don't expect to be caught up for months or longer depending on my free time and sanity. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as keep the raw delete the rest. Sometimes I have multiple PSD documents with different version names and edits, sometimes with multiple layers, and I have to use a variety of information to identify which one is indeed the correct one to keep...or open them all/both.
Often, file size can be an indicator for me and aids in making the decision more quickly. For instance between 2 psd files with the same Megapixles I'm often able to identify the flattened version vs the layers intact version by file size if it wasn't properly noted in the filename, which unfortunately due to a combination of bad or evolving practices and being tired or rushed happens more often than I'd like to admit. One I just came across that brought me here searching was 3 similarly named and appearing PSD files of a panorama, all with the same MP/dimensions. One was flattened, one was the original stitch, and one was flattened with a few masks, adjustments, and an extra layer, and being the one I'd want to keep. Filesize helped me quickly identify which was which. Also sometimes dimensions are misleading, like when a panorama is first created and uncropped, its dimensions are larger, but a tighter cropped image with multiple layers and a larger file size indicates to me that it is newer and more finished, even though smaller dimensions typically indicates a crop and may not be a 'master' copy. Additionally, 2 images with different names but the exact same file size are very likely duplicates (at least in my workflow) but 2 similarly looking images with the same dimensions could be retouched/not, sharpened/not, have noise reduction/not, and I'd have to view them in detail to determine if they were in fact identical. For my purposes (since these are my personal fine art images & I have the raw files incase I occasionally mess up) I'm often willing to trade an educated guess for my time. Seeing identical file sizes on 2 apparently similar images is good enough for me to delete one.
I can select them individually and check...it's not a horrific problem. But it would save me time so I was hoping I had simply missed how to view that. My reasoning is 'why not' have the option available with all the others? Me personally, I don't care about megapixels when I already have the dimensions, that's just redundant and honestly much less helpful than LxW. File size would be an additional tool I would use, though. There are other examples but the main thing is that I do spend time checking filesize, and specifically when comparing multiple images, so having it displayed in the cell would be a time saver for me.

Why is 100% scanned image not = to 100% zoom in CS5??

Using OS X 10.6.7 and CS5 Extended: I am having full size patterns scanned by a reprographics company as tif files. On average the full size patterns will be from 40" to 60" (100%). Yet when I open them with CS5 and zoom to 100 % in order to 'clean up' the designs on the pattern, the image is way larger than the hard copy pattern - more like 500%. I've noticed in one instance that zooming to 33% is closer to actual size. The image file from the full size scan opens as 2% .tif(Bitmap). How is it that 33% zoom gives me closer to actual (scanned image) than the 100% that I would expect? Thanks to anyone who can help clear this up for me.

100% means actual pixels, not actual size of the item being scanned. If your monitor displays 100 pixels per inch an image scanned at 300 ppi will look three times larger than actual at 100%.
thanks to MBlackburn.

How to make "adjustments" to multiple images simultaneously?

Hi,
I have several images from a shoot with the incorrect while balance setting. Since these images were all taken under similar lighting conditions, I would like to adjust the white balance for all the shots simultaneously....how do i do this?

The Lift & Stamp tool will let you do this. Make the adjustments to one, then lift the adjustments from there and stamp the rest. Check out pages 13 & 14 in the "Performing Adjustments" PDF (found in the help menu) for details on how to do this.

Resize Multiple Images Simultaneously?

Someone told me that in an Adobe product (not sure if its PS) there is a way to resize several image files simultaneously to the same size. I cannot find a way to do this. Has anyone done this before or does anyone know how to?
Thanks

chavite wrote:
Im Sorry! I have CS4.
OK
Do any of the following
Choose File > Scripts > Image Processor (Photoshop)
Choose Tools > Photoshop > Image Processor (Bridge)
Its use is is fairly self-explanatory but help tells all!
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/11.0/WSfd1234e1c4b69f30ea53e41001031ab64-7426a.html

Apply Auto Enhance filter to Multiple images Simultaneously?

Greetings Apple Discussions:
Is it possible to apply the (Preset: Quick Fixes: "Auto Enhance") filter to 89 images at the same time or in a batch?
If Aperture cant do it what software would you suggest?
Thanks.

Select all the versions that you want to auto enhance. Then on the Photos menu: Add Adjustment Preset>Quick Fixes>Auto Enhance.

Can't display multiple images simultaneously in PSE 9

In PSE 8 I could drag two images from the tray onto the main display for side by side comparison. And when I went into "Quick" edit mode, I'd see before and after images of the same photo side by side. Now in PSE 9 I can't do either of those things. Is there a way?

In Full Edit go to the preferences>General and turn on Allow Floating windows, then you can use it as you did in PSE 8.
In Quick Fix there's a pulldown menu below the preview area where you can set it to display Before/after.

Trouble with the image quality when viewing under 100%. First time posting on the forum.

Hello everyone. I am sorry we have the get acquainted this way but I am having some issues and this is one of my last options of getting help.   Allow me to explain the problem.    When viewing a file under 100% zoom, everything looks jagged like the anti aliasing is missing. Once I zoom in to 100%, everything looks the way it should. The saved file ( jpeg format for instance) is okay. I can zoom out and it still looks true to the image. The problem is related to photoshop. I installed my latest GPU drivers twice just to be sure and it was not from that.   This problem started last night and I don`t quite know how to solve it. If I work on small resolution images, it isn`t such a bad problem because I will be working on 100% zoom, but I am working on high resolution images/ paintings. Somewhere around 8000x5000 pixels thus, working at 100% is not that doable. I attached an image that shows this issue. The one on the right is the zoomed out version and the one on the left is the zoomed in version. Yes, the noise is affected by this, badly, but this started last night. up until then everything looked good even with noise or an out of this world sharpness. I can`t imagine what I could have done to trigger this.
   This being said, I am at the mercy of the more knowledgeable folks from around here. I do hope I posted this question in the right section. This is my first post here so sorry if I messed something up.   Looking forward to your replies.

Here is a simplistic view that I feel may help you understand reality.
The only time you're looking at your image pixels in Photoshop is when you're zoomed in to 100%,   There your look at the actual image pixels Photoshop has for your image at your displays resolution.
At any other zoom level you are looking a scaled image that has more or less pixels than your actual image these too are displayed at your display resolution.
The scaling done by Photoshop is done for displaying your image is done for good performance not for the best image quality a quick interpolation.   Therefore at some zoom levels image quality looks poorer than at other zoom levels.
High resolution Display have now add a new wrinkle.   User interfaces were designed for displays with resolutions around 100 PPI elements like text, icon, and other things like checkboxes, buttons etc. were created so there size would be useable are this more or less fixed 100 PPI resolution.   While Photoshop was designed to scale your images so you can work well on it is was not designed with a scalable UI. Photoshop can not scale its user interface independently from its image display display window for you displays high resolution. Photoshop's Image display area has the same resolution as the rest of Photoshop User Interface. Just like there is only one resolution in all layers in a document. CC 2014 2xUI changes that. PS UI is scaled to 1/2 resolution the image Area is at the displays actual resolution.
Photoshop CC 2014 2x UI scales all of Photoshop User Interface including the image display to 200% which is 1/2 your display resolution effectively cutting you display pixel count to 1/4 its actual pixel count.   Your once again running on a low resolution display.     If your display has a native resolution 200 PPI you're running it at 100 ppi if your display has a 300 PPI resolution you're running it at 150ppi.    Which defeats the reason of having high resolution. Which is you would like to be able to edit your images at print resolution. Adobe cc2x UI scales the UI but not the image window soa inage is 216ppi on the Surface Pro 3 the UI is large and dpoes not fit. screen
To be able to edit your images at print resolution you need a display the has a print resolution and you need and application the can scale its image display and its UI independently.
Current there is no OS interface for having multiple resolutions areas on a display and applications like Photoshop can not scale UI and Image independently. OS and Photoshop can scale what is displayed. Adobe Photoshop executable is coded in a way that it tell Microsoft Windows OS that it will handle display scaling so it can using your displays native resolution. Currently Only Photoshop CC 2014 Provides you with the option of running you display at half resolution.
Windows can scale you display to many resolution and as several presets. like 100%, 125%, 150% and like Adobe 200% half resolution.    You can make a Windows Registry and add an External Photoshop Manifest file the tell's Microsoft Windows to handle display scaling. I have a Microsoft Surface Pro 3 m windows machine. Its LCD has a 216PPI resolution. Windows 8.1 had 4 preset for scaling its LCD.
Surface Pro 3 LCD Display 12" IPS display 3:2 aspect ratio 9.984603532054124" Wide, 6.656402354702749" High 216.3330765278394 PPI
Microsoft Preset Display scaling
100% 2160x1440   216 PPI
125% 1728x1152   173 PPI
150% 1440x960    144 PPI SP3 Default setting
200% 1080x720    108 PPI
Most user these days has 1024x768 or better displays and Web pages are often authored for 800x600 pixels pages. So the give you a better handle on Resolution and scaling I have edit a 800x600 document with 25x25 px grid one my Surface pro 3
using Windows 4 scaling presets and captured the 2160x1140 scaled screens Only at the 100% preset does the image window have a 216ppi Also note @ 2x UI Photoshop UI doe not fit on screen
Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 2xUI Scales the UI to a display 1/2 resolution but does not scale the Image area uses actual screen resolution. Photoshop Help system info show the screen i 1/2 resilution 1080x720 but scalet the imase to the real resolution 2160x1440. however the image window is the 216ppi the ui 108ppi via scaling

Resize multiple imported images simultaneously

Is there anyway to resize multiple images simultaneously? Currently, I select 8 - 12 jpegs and drag them into fireworks, then resize each one individually. Is there anyway to streamline this process? I tried selecting all of the jpegs at once and fireworks seems to be trying to resize the images in relation to the canvas which doesn't result in identical image sizes.

Read the Fireworks help files section on batch processing.

Zoom on multiple images don´t work, please help!

When I have selected multiple images and click ”z” command in multi-view mode Aperture automatic deselects all images except the first and last ones and zooms in on just this two. This appear on RAW files from Canon EOS 1DmII and 10D.
Is there anyone else having this problem?
Is it a bug or a feature?
Best regards / Jerker

Interesting thread, as I never knew you could zoom in on multiple images, so I gave it a try...
I was able to select 6 RAW (Nikon D100 NEF's) images, and then hit "z" to zoom in on them with no problem. I then hit "f" for full screen mode, and that showed all images as well. It was great to be able to use my mighty mouse to then simply hover over each picture and pan (using the track ball) around each image in that mode.
So, at least for my system (quad 2.5 G5, 5G RAM, 7800GT) I was able to see all of the images.
-Tom
Powermac Quad Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Images are always magnified and not showing at 100% zoom level

http://s7.postimg.org/oy0gq3x8b/chrome_firefox.png
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
left side is Chrome rendering; right side is Firefox
Notice the 3 images, all rendered zoomed in by Firefox.
No matter what I set in Preferences, what plugin I tried, i can't reset to 100% zoom.

Hello,
Firefox on Windows is now following display scaling options which may render text larger on high resolution displays.
You can adjust your screen resolution.
To modify it do the following:
* Type '''about:config''' into the Firefox address bar and tap on the Enter key.
* If the warning '''This might void your warranty''' appears, click '''I'll be careful, I promise'''.
* Search for '''layout.css.devPixelsPerPx'''
[[Image:Fx22layout.css.devPixelsPerPx]]
* Double-click on layout.css.devPixelsPerPx to modify its value. The default is -1.0 in Firefox 22 and above. Change it to '''1.0''' to make it work like in previous Firefox versions.
If necessary, further adjust the value in 0.1 or 0.05 steps. Use values between 1.0 and about 0.5 to reduce elements in size. Use values greater than 1.0 to increase size. For example, a value of 1.25 will increase font size to 125% to accommodate the default DPI setting in Windows 8. '''Double check the value that you enter.''' Setting a too small value will make everything disappear and a too large value will blow things up.
If web pages still need to be adjusted then you can look at the [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/default-fullzoom-level/ Default FullZoom Level] or [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/nosquint/ NoSquint] extension.
To adjust the font size for the user interface, you can use the [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/ Theme Font & Size Changer] extension.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
Thank you.

Advancing and Zooming multiple images at the same time.

Hi All,
I have requested this feature since early Lightroom beta 1, so I'm trying again.
Example: I have multiple images opened up in 'Survey' mode, let's say 3 or 4 mages. Which on my Apple 23' Cinema Display makes for much nicer size reviewing, than the largest 'Thumbnail' setting.
The basic ability to hit a combo-keystroke, and advance all the frames at once in 'Survey' mode, to the next set of images of that same total. You know, same as 'page up' or 'page down' in the thumbnail view in the Grid. Also, to zoom all of them at the same time.
Now, I know IiView Media Pro could do this several years ago, before Microsoft turned it into 'Expressions Media', with 4 images at a time. And like I said, I've been requesting it since early LR beta 1. You know, just add a 'Shift' to the Page Up/Down function keys. Or 'Option' or "Control' key.
I love the Survey mode, but surely we can have up to four, or even a half-dozen images, advance at the same time, instead of adding or subtracting one image at a time. As it currently does.
Thanks,
-Sol

Based on the frequency with which this trips up users, the Aperture team is going to have to add a much stronger visual indication that "Primary Only" is active. Marching ants, anyone? Or a pink selection marquee?
At least in the Viewer when multiple Images are selected the thin white selection marquee is dropped when Primary Only is active. There is no such change in the Browser.

Needed simple script to reset multiple images to 100%

I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I cannot find such a script anywhere: what I want is to reset the size of multiple selected images back to 100%.
Looks like such a simple and needed function is not included in InDesign CS3...
(MacBook Pro, Indesign CS3).

"codevar" at the start oughta be just "var".
"idx[idx]." oughtta be "sel[idx]." -- twice.
Otherwise (untested) it seems it should work.
Harbs, was this sent by e-mail? I've been having flowers weird problems lately, trying to format something as quote or code with the flowers Jive web editor. Some flowers line of flowers java keeps popping up -- using IE 8, latest flowers update.

Zoom and Pan of image

My objective is to be able to zoom in on an image and be able
to pan the image around within my stage.
Is there any tutorials that anyone knows of.
Thanks for your time

You can use ActionScript to create a mouse event to your
image (convert it to a movie clip) and when the user clicks on the
image, he can make the image bigger or smaller. It's not a real
zooming in but if the image gets bigger you do see more.
Is that what you are trying to achieve?

Panning multiple images simultaneously under 100% zoom

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for