Panorama function in Lightroom 6 delivers horrible results.

When I'm creating a panorama with lightroom 6 out of three .nef-Files (RAW with 36 Mio Pixles) I get horrible results. The generated .DNG is with a very low resolution and not usable. What can I do?

Never seen anything like that before. I export with resizing all the time. As long as the quality is somewhat up from 80% (100% is complete overkill) and I do appropriate output sharpening, the quality is always superb. Of course there is only so much you can do with a 1000 pixels so don't expect to zoom endlessly in on that. The ppi does not matter at all when you specify a size in pixels. Can you post an example?

Similar Messages

  • Using the photomerge panorama function in Elements 10

    I have just installed Elements 10 and when trying to use the Photomerge Panorama function the whole programme shuts down. I have tried re-installing the programme and the problem is still there. I have tried using the instructions fron The Dummies handbook but the problem persists.

    I've moved your question to the Photoshop Elements forum to get the best results.

  • Why does my iPod touch has, despite iOS 6, no panorama function in the camera?

    Why does my iPod touch has, despite iOS 6, no panorama function in the camera?

    Because it is not available for the 4G.
    iOS 6: Which software features does my iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch support?

  • "edit in" function in lightroom copies raw file to same location. is there a way to change location?

    As far as I can tell, the "edit in" photoshop function in LightRoom copies a RAW file in the same location, I end up with two of the same image in my library, is there a way to specify where lightroom saves the file?

    You should ask in Photoshop Lightroom
    The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
    The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
    If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
    You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
    Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

  • Considering Purchase of Wacom Cintiq 27 HD Touch - Questions about Touch Functionality in Lightroom 5 & Photoshop CS6

    I am considering purchase of a Wacom Cintiq 27 HD Touch monitor. I have a few questions relative to two Adobe programs and their use of "touch" functionality - Lightroom 5.7 and Photoshop CS6 running on Windows 7.
    1. Have the problems related to touch functionality in Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 5 been resolved that you see on this and Wacom's forums from a year ago?
    2. If so, is there enough value gained via touch functionality in Lightroom 5 and Photoshop CS6 to warrant the $500 difference in price between the Cintiq 27 HD vs HD Touch? (I realize that this is a subjective question based on the abundance of one's cash.)
    3. I plan to stay with CS6 as long as humanly possible to avoid a monthly software subscription, BUT I do wonder if purchasing the HD Touch now may provide additional touch functionality in future versions of these software products that are not currently available. (So this is a pie in the sky sort of question.)
    Thanks,
    Kent

    Photoshop Touch support is added in CC 2014.2.2.  However Wacom tablets like the Intuos Pro with touch can be use with prior versions of Photoshop and the Wacom Tablets Configurator can customized the tablets touch features to be used with Photoshop.  I do not use LR but I'm sure the same would be true for it. You can configure setting for many applications. The device driver knows which application its interfacing with and uses the setting set for each..
    I disable most of touch when using Photoshop.  The Main reason I have a tablet is Photoshop Brush type tools. Like eraser, clone stamp, etc nothing is better then a pen when it come to creating layer mask.  For most programs I still use a mouse and I use the Keyboard, Mouse and Pen with Photoshop....
    I never wanted a Cintig I like not having my hand  between my eyes and work. I not an artist though.

  • I have been using Photoshop Elements 11 photo merge function.  However, the Photomerge panorama function is no longer accessible - it is visible but greyed out on the "enhance" menu.  I have tried to reinstall software, but no change.

    I have been using Photoshop Elements 11 photo merge function.  However, the Photomerge panorama function is no longer accessible - it is visible but greyed out on the "enhance" menu.  I have tried to reinstall software, but no change.

    Click on Expert and the Enhance>Photomerge>Photomerge Panorama should be available

  • How is Panorama function accessed in Photoshop Elem 11?

    The documentation and help information shows a panorama function available from the drop-down menu, but there is no option in the software.  Has that feature been dropped from the software?

    Try this:
    1) File >> New >> PhotoMerge Panorama
    2) Select the option for the type
    3) Click Browse button to select the image for this exercise (or simply Add the open files by using the button for all open filoes)
    4) If you are browsing then select your images from your folders
    6) Click OK
    Hope these basic steps can help you (PSE 10; I don't have 11).  I haven't dealt with correction of final output that is sometimes required.
    Good luck.

  • Is there any way to invert the movement of the arrow on the Panorama function?

    Does anyone know if it's possible to invert the movement of the Arrow on the Panorama function so that when you move the device UP it moves DOWN??
    I feel like I want to move the line to the arrow and not the other way round.

    None that I know of no

  • I updated my lightroom and as a result had to update creative cloud.  now my previously imported pics are not available as a file

    i updated my Lightroom and as a result also creative cloud
    now i cannot access my pics

    No, I don't think that will be necessary. You didn't answer my question about what version you have been using. But I assume that it must be some version of Lightroom 5. Going on that assumption, here is the link you should go to in order to download the proper installer for Lightroom 5.7. You will need to delete the Lightroom program that you installed. Then, download from this website and install:
    Adobe - Lightroom : For Macintosh : Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7

  • FR: Stitching/Panorama functionality

    I think it would be very useful to have the ability to stitch images together a la the various panorama packages out there. Of course, I realise that this won't happen until the 10000x10000 pixel limitation on the picture size is dealt with first in the imaging engine. This is probably one of the few functions that is not currently provided by Lr that I would certainly find useful. So, for the time being I still use the Canon stitching software that came with the camera.

    Don't get me wrong. I would have no trouble with the Photoshop CS3
    photomerge in to Lightroom (more manual control also would be most welcome).
    But, until the raise the image size there is no point. The problem is that
    some people are complaining now about the 9,999 limit. I was complaining
    during the beta and was told by all that I was an idiot and that the limit
    wasn't even close to being an issue. Now back to the problem. The problem is
    that I don't think this limit will be raised any time soon. For one thing
    Adobe would also have to do this to ACR since LR uses ACR technology.
    Second, Adobe would have to do more in LR when it came to handling virtual
    memory, what little it has now isn't all that great and as far as I know ACR
    doesn't have anything.
    So I wouldn't go holding my breath. It is my opinion that since Adobe did
    Lightroom from the ground up, they should have done it right right from the
    start and the didn't. So already we are looking at some major overhauling.
    Poor very poor design decisions, but that Adobe seems to do a lot of that.
    Robert

  • Help with scroll function in Lightroom

    I have two laptop on which I installed lightroom this afternoon.
    Thinkpad T420, Windows 7 pro 64bit, all drivers up-to-date
    Thinkpad X201, Windows 7 pro 64bit, all drivers up-to-date
    The mouse scroll function is not working in Lightroom.   It is functioning in all other software on the machines, including Nikon ViewNX.  I have tried to solve the issue by uninstalling and reinstalling the Ultranav drivers from synaptic.  No luck.   I have also tried using just the trackpad, or just the trackpoint.  I have tried changing the mouse focus to be whatever is below the pointer. No different.  Please advise me on what I can do to solve this as without the scroll working, LR only slows down my workflow.
    Thanks

    I'm having the exact same problem. My scroll wheel always controlled the sliders in the develop area. It mysteriously stopped doing so about 3-5 months ago. Not sure if some Windows update or what might have changed it. There are no settings in the mouse software other than how many lines the wheel scrolls at a time. I couldn't find anything in LR preferences, either. I've just been getting along w/o it but I miss the feature. I'm using the same Microsoft wireless mouse I've had for a couple of years so no idea what might have impacted this.
    UPDATE: I'm embarrassed to say that I just got around to simply trying a different mouse. Hooked up a Logitech mouse and the scrolling functions all work just fine. I suspect my Microsoft mouse rec'd a driver update in the past 3-6 months and somehow disabled the scroll wheel function as it pertains to the sliders. The wheel is working in all other regards so I kept thinking it must be a setting in Lightroom that I had screwed up. I'm going to rollback the driver just out of curiousity but at least I have functionality back via the very simple fix of plugging in a different mouse.

  • [SQL Question] to_char function not eliminating time from query results

    Have a query that returns a time/date field, and I want to eliminate the time, because its not necessary
    select distinct c.short_name as client, c.client_id, p.list_id, p.entity_id, e.aid, a.first_name, a.last_name,
    p.sf_completed_date, p.email_sent, p.consent_given as dw1_consent, e.share_info_approved as rb_consent
         from profiles p, entities@ROADBED_ASPHALT_READ e,           clients@ROADBED_ASPHALT_READ c,
         lists@ROADBED_ASPHALT_READ l, associates@ROADBED_ASPHALT_READ   a
              where e.share_info_approved = 'Y'
              and sf_completed_date > trunc(to_date('09/11/2006', 'mm/dd/yyyy'))
              and e.list_id in  (715,/*959,*/993,/*995,*/1001,/*1106,*//*1252,*//*1292,*/1321,/*1354,*/1882,/*2061,*/2173,2273,2306,/*2334,*//*2464,*/2693,
    2716,2754,2779,2805,2863,/*2864,*//*2939,*/2966,/*3411,*/3412,3602,3679,/*3886,*//*4011,*//*4026,*//*4295,*/4777,4837,5418,7640)
              and p.entity_id = e.entity_id
              and p.list_id = l.list_id
              and l.client_id = c.client_id
              and e.aid = a.aid
              order by c.short_name, a.first_name, a.last_name, sf_completed_date;This query will run by the column of sf_completed_date, it still isn't getting ride of the time, and I have no idea why.
    thanks

    Use the function substr(p.sf_completed_date, (instr(p.sf_completed_date,'/',1) + 1), length(p.sf_completed_date))
    example :
    SQL> select instr('1234/5678', '/',1) from dual;
    INSTR('1234/5678','/',1)
    5
    Result gives the position of character '/'.
    SQL> select length('1234/5678') from dual;
    LENGTH('1234/5678')
    9
    SQL>
    Result gives length of the string - the last character.
    Now ----
    SQL> select substr('1234/5678',(instr('1234/5678', '/',1) + 1), length('1234/5678')) from dual;
    SUBS
    5678
    SQL>
    The result gives you the desired result after / here in your case the date
    Hope the example will help you to solve the problem
    Surej.
    Message was edited by:
    Surej

  • Increasing Bitrate for Encode resulting in horrible results

    I've been migrating from Final Cut Studio to all the various Adobe alternatives and having an issue with Encore right now. 
    I've been successfully making DVDs and letting Encore automatically encode for me (As I often times end up making a BluRay as well of a project, this gives me the option of swapping out the footage and keeping the chapter markers intact).  So far it's been working great and calculates things to within 20mb of utilizing all available disc space.
    I'm having problems with my most recent project, however.
    Initially it was going to be the standard warning video intro and a 1:45 video. Had everything encoded and it looked great (and the show video was 3.9GB).  Then the client decided to add another 10 minute slideshow to things and everything...went downhill.  Original encode still worked and fit on the disc, but in a moment of stupidity I thought it would be good to re-encode so I had everything fresh. And for some odd reason the show's size shrank from 3.9GB to 3.2GB, leaving over 500mb of unused space. It looked OK but I thought it would be good to reclaim the underutilized bitrate. And every effort to do so has resulted in really horrible lacing issue/jagged piano strings and lines footage on the DVD.
    Not sure why given that all I've done is increase the Target Bitrate of the standard Transcode setting (NTSC DV 23.97 High Qulality 2 pass 4mb) from 4 to 5 mbps and the Pixel Aspect Ratio from Standard 4:3 to Widescreen 16:9 (thus increasing the Estimated File Size from 3212 to 3900)
    The source clip is 720X480 (1.2121) 29.97fps, progressive
    I've kept Field Order at "Automatic" (so think I'll try changing it to None (Progressive) in case it wasn't really doing it automatically).
    Is there anything else? It's a pretty static concert one camera shot
    Thanks for any help
    Jonathan

    That's what I'm afraid of   I was hoping I was going to hear something like "the algorithn for bitrate doesn't like 5, try 4.8" or something like that..
    I re-encoded as I noticed the default for Encore was 23.97 and as my footage is 29.97 (and output usually is 29.97 for DVD isn't it?) I wanted to see if it made a difference. And the answer is no...
    Here is the preset I used:
    Here is what came out (screen shot from playing via VLC):
    And as a frame of reference, here's how it looks when I just let Encore do it's thing automatically:
    I will try creating a new project and importing all the footage as fresh timelines, plus the main menu to access things, to see how an automatic encode changes via that workaround. Seems like an odd...bug? Lack of feature? not to be able to add things after one reaches a certain point in a project and having to start over from scratch (especially since I do a lot of tweaking of the menus by sending things back to Photoshop to get layout, highlights, etc just right and it's one of the features I love about Encore vs DVD Studio Pro or any other option I've looked at)

  • Export functions of Lightroom 3

    I have lost the setting for "burn full size Jpegs" in the lightroom 3 export option. Can I redownload the program to get it back? I don't want to lose all the collections and other personal things I have built. I am planning to upgrade to the current LR version? Should I just do this and assume I will have everthing stay in place and add the proper functions I am missing???    

    Post this in the Lightroom Forum - there is help there, this is the feature request forum - not much help here.
    Hint: New -> Discussion -> Photoshop Lightroom.
    Rob

  • Import Function problem Lightroom 5

    I'm testing Lightroom 5 and it seems to be great, but the import function seems to be stupid! Even when I make a new folder in lightroom it doesn't import there, it makes a new folder in Lightroom using where the photos used to be! I've lost some now because of that! That's really annoying! Or is there something I don't understand?

    Hi,
    here are the screen captures:

Maybe you are looking for

  • Discoverer Plus - How to include variable text in the Title

    Hi, I need to include a variable text in the report like the user information or another information i woul like to obtain from a query that is not the standars date,time,... oracle discoverer plus improves us. I tried with calculations associates to

  • Evolution has stoped associating doc files with open office

    I've recently upgraded to open office 2.3 and since doing it evolution no longer gives me the option to open doc attachments, I only get the save option. I'm running fluxbox and no gnome apps such as nautilus, how can I put the association back?

  • Mac OS X Tiger Server - SLOW BOOT

    Our XServe runs Mac OS X Tiger Server with an external 800 GB RAID 5 setup. The internal Tiger Server OS resides on the XServe's internal 80 GB hard drive. The server runs fine after the boot up process. However, when restarting the server for mainte

  • Problems w/ Project Manager

    Hello everyone, I'm working with adobe project manager and I'm running into a few issues. The purpose of using this at the local TV station where I work is to manage media and archive after a project's completion while still being able to go back in

  • MAJOR CC PROBLEMS!

    Ok...I'm at a complete loss. I don't know what the heck is happening. I re-exported my entire main show from FCP and gave it the proper timecode from the first voice spoken...00.00.14.16. I then brought that mpeg2 file into DVSP and attached the SCC