Parallel Currecy for derived depreication area

I found many threads related to this but not a clear solution. Here is my issue, we have depreciation area 01 which represents IFRS and area 05 represents Local books. Derived deprecation area 55 posts the difference of area 05 and area 01. Area 01 and area 55 post to GL accounts and the combination of GLs provide local reporting values.
Area 01 has parallel area 32 which represents group currency. So while posting the GL amounts in group currency match to area 32.
But since area 55 is a derived area there is no parallel currency for 55 and hence while posting entries system converts local to group currency using current exchange rate.
Reporting in local currency works fine as area 01 and 55 posts in local currency.
But reporting in group currency doesnu2019t work as group currency in area 55 is converted based on current exchange rate and not historic.
How can I solve this issue? so that both local and group currency report balances match.

Hi,
Go to t.code OB22 - Ex rate type - M fpr Parallel currencies T.code: OAW3 - Ex rate type - M (Capitalization date as base)
T.code: OABT - Area 30 - 30 USD, Area 31 - 60 CNY
Go to bellow link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_dimp50/helpdata/en/2d/aa1f417849ef23e10000000a155106/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/4f/71dc07448011d189f00000e81ddfac/content.htm
Thanks,
Raviteja

Similar Messages

LSMW derived depreciation area

Is there a setting to populate automatically the values for the derived depreciation area and not including the values in the load.
I know identical dependant values need not be loaded. Just trying to know if the same is possible for derived depreciation areas by customizing.
Is anyone aware of the customizing for getting the fabove functionality.

The system is already setup and there are assets existing. I am planning to do a load for a few assets using LSMW and the standard prog limits to 8 depreciaotion areas and we have 12 depreciation areas to be loaded.
I can eliminate the identical ones and I am looking at options to eliminate the derived ones.

Derived depreciation area

Hello Gurus,
I am trying to create derived depreciation area with t-code OADB.
This t-code is disabled and not allowing me to define the derived areas. Is this the right t-code to define Derived areas? or Is there any other way?
Please help me. Your time will be greately appreciated..
Thank you..
Regards
Geeta

Hello
Postings to derived area is simultaneous.
check this
The "Derived Depreciation Areas" component makes it possible to determine new asset values based on asset values that have already been determined. The derived depreciation area uses mathematical formulas to determine values based on values in real areas, such as the difference between depreciation in two depreciation areas. The system then manages these new values in the derived depreciation area.
You define the formula for the derived depreciation area in FI-AA Customizing (Define depreciation areas). In the formula for a derived area, you can use up to four real areas. The arithmetic operations allowed are addition and subtraction. It is possible to mix the calculation rules. This includes using proportional values from real areas in the calculation.
When defining the formula, it is up to you to make sure it is reasonable. Make sure that the key of the derived area is larger than the keys of the real areas it is based on. A derived area "03" can be derived from the real areas "01" and "02" but not from areas "04" and "05."
You can also specify that the derived depreciation area is only for reporting. The system then does not subject the area to value checks (such as the check for positive/negative net book value).
When defining a derived depreciation area, keep in mind that the rules for remaining book value rule in the derived depreciation area can affect the depreciation in the real areas from which it is derived (see Characteristics of a Depreciation Area). Enter a modification area in order to specify which of the real areas this should be.
Be careful when using derived depreciation areas for group assets. In the formula for derived depreciation areas that are for group assets, you can only use depreciation areas that are also intended for group assets (see Group Assets).
Reg
*assign points if useful

Prcessing KEU5 transaction for multilple controlling areas in parallel

Hi,
I have executed KUE5 transaction with an assessment cycle for a controlling area and when i try to execute the same transaction with an assessment cycle for another controlling area in parallel, there is an error message 'Cycle YOCETEST2 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Please provide me a solution to execute the assessment cycles for multiple controlling areas in parallel.
Regards,
Satish.

Hello,
Are you able to solve this? I am getting this error sometimes when the transaction KSV5 fails.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Rushi

Parallel currency for deprciation areas

Company code currency is npr and group currency is INR. When creating the asset it is giving the error as Derived deprciation error.
Asset INTERN-00001 0 group asset CoCd. 2400
E028 The constituent areas of derived area 31 1 have differen.

Hi,
While defining the derived depreciation area, you have used depreciation areas which are managed in different currencies. This is not possible since the system cannot calculated the difference between depreciation/APC amount in two different currencies.
You need to correct the configuration of the derived depreciation area in such a way that the depreciation areas used in the equation are having the same currency.
Regards,
~Vishal

Can a derived depreciation area be a real area for depreciation postings?

Example :
Book area 1 (real)        : $100,000
Area 2 (not real)          : $120,000
Derived area                : Area 2 minus Area 1 = $20,000 (depreciation calculation based on this)
Is above possible?

Hi,
the F1 Help of the field "real depreciation area" says:
Set this indicator if you want the system to store the values of this depreciation area in the database (meaning that the area is not a derived depreciation area). The values in this area are then updated each time a posting is made, and can be immediately evaluated.
regards
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Oct 25, 2010 10:02 AM

Derived depr. area to post into GL (past values)

Hello, here I describe my situation:
I have created 2 new asset depreciation areas: one of them is to store paralell values for fixed assets (12) and the other (13) is a derived area which will be used to post differences between area 12 and area 01, is a derived area but it is configured to post into GL .
New values are going to be set up for area 12 using transaction AS92 but the transfer date for these values is in the past (date 12.31.2007). After uploading the values I need to post also in the new area the retirement and transfer movements that were posted in area 01 during years 2008-2010 and also the depreciation posted in area 01 during these years. The thing is that we don´t want these transactions from a fiscal year in the past to be posted in an already closed fiscal year, but manually in fiscal year 2010.
Is it possible to configure area 13 not to post into GL and then once the retirements and depreciations of year 2008, 2009 and 2010 (up to present period) are posted change the configuration of depr. Area into u201CPost assets periodically in General Ledgeru201D and the system starts posting depreciations and other transactions into GL for the new area from June 2010 forward? If so, Can I obtain depreciations posted in area 13 from 01.01.2008 to 30.06.2010.
Thanks in advance for your help

Hello
Please go to customizing:
-Asset Accounting
-Integration with the General Ledger
-Post APC Values Periodically to the General Ledger
-Maintain Posting Rules for Parallel Accounting Principles
and maintain area 11 for the company code.
please also ensure that the flag "area for reporting purposes only" in OADB,
depr area 11.
regards
Ray

How do i use parallel compression for 4 drum tracks in Logic pro 7.2.3 Please

how do i use parallel compression for 4 drum tracks in Logic pro 7.2.3 Please. my version is 7.2.3 and my son did his drums on 4 tracks. 2 OH's 1 Kick and 1 Snare. Were confused because we cant figure out how to do parallel compression on the older logic version 7.2.3?

I can't remember when the Aux tracks became the new buss tracks, so I'll spell this out using busses.
The way I do it, is I assign all my drum tracks to a buss, say buss 1.
Then, on buss 2, I assign it's INPUT to buss 1.
So buss 1 (all the drums) are feeding into buss 2 simultaneously.
Put a compressor on buss 2, turn the fader down all the way, then as the track is playing, bring buss 2's fader up slowly, until you hear the effect you're after.
You could also do this using sends on the 4 drum tracks, set to feed the buss with the compressor on it.
I hope I haven't forgotten anything particular to that version of Logic. See if this helps...

COPA Assessment Cycle using KEU5 for multiple controlling areas

Hello All,
There is an organization with operations in several countries. There is a separate controlling area for each country. There is one controlling area, for instance, for Germany and another for Netherlands.
A problem is encountered while executing transaction KEU5 for multiple controlling areas in parallel. For instance, when one user from Germany executes KEU5 for an assessment cycle for Germany controlling area and at the same time another user from Netherlands tries to execute KEU5 for a cycle for NL controlling area, the user from Netherlands encounters an error message u201C'Cycle XXXX 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Apparently SAP allows assessment cycles for exactly one controlling area to be executed together. This poses a problem since the organization plans to implement SAP in several other countries (There will be one separate controlling area for each country as per the organization structure adopted by the company).
Any ideas, views or suggestions on the aforesaid issue would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Soumya

Hi Soumya,
Did you find any text in SAP Documentation saying that "SAP does not allow cycles belonging to different controlling areas to be executed at the same time"...?
Pls find the following text from SAP Help...
Parallel Processing of Cycles of an Allocation Type
Use
Parallel processing of cycles results in considerable time savings. To process cycles of one allocation type in parallel, they must be assigned to different cycle run groups.
You define the cycle run groups in the cycle header data. You also assign cycles to the cycle run groups in the header data.
To process the cycles of a cycle run group in parallel, start the cycles one after the other, if required, in different sessions.
You are carrying out a cross-company code cost accounting and want to perform the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel. Create a cycle run group for each company code and assign the appropriate cycles to these groups. You can then carry out the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel.
When you execute a cycle, you can start a consistency check. The system checks whether you are allowed to execute the selected cycles in parallel.
Though I didn't come across such requirement, I feel, my earlier suggestion will work out...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Mail.app: non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers

Manual setup of POP accounts has a non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers.
To review: for each account you must enter setup data for a single POP (incoming) server, but you are offered multiple choices for SMTP (outgoing) servers, and Mail.app supports sharing a single SMTP server setup among multiple accounts.
Why?
Why not just offer distinct setups for each account in each direction?   There must be a good reason for all this extra structure…. yes?
More specifically: What are implications for multiple accounts, e.g.
      [email protected]
      [email protected]
using the same outgoing server?   It seems to me that Mail.app encourages you use a single SMTP server setup for both, am I correct?    But this seems to undermine proper security. I think each account should uses its own credentials for both incoming and outgoing, yes?
In Mail.app V8.2, shipped with MacOS 10.10.2, Mail.app offers an opportunity to set up a second distinct SMTP server (in the above example, for [email protected]) but the text boxes for username and password refuse to accept text. Is this just my experience, a local problem? Or is it observed by others? If so… a new way of enforcing sharing of SMTP setups, or a bug?
I'm very curious about the long-term Mail.app design philosophy in this regard, but this is not just curiosity: I'm having trouble with multiple email accounts after upgrading to 10.10.2 In each case, when I try to set up multiple accounts on a single mail server.
I've done quite a bit of searching for explanations of mail.app's design, without success. It is very possible I've missed some relevant explanations. If so, please provide links and accept my apologies.
TIA

Manual setup of POP accounts has a non-parallel structure for incoming versus outgoing servers.
To review: for each account you must enter setup data for a single POP (incoming) server, but you are offered multiple choices for SMTP (outgoing) servers, and Mail.app supports sharing a single SMTP server setup among multiple accounts.
Why?
Why not just offer distinct setups for each account in each direction?   There must be a good reason for all this extra structure…. yes?
More specifically: What are implications for multiple accounts, e.g.
      [email protected]
      [email protected]
using the same outgoing server?   It seems to me that Mail.app encourages you use a single SMTP server setup for both, am I correct?    But this seems to undermine proper security. I think each account should uses its own credentials for both incoming and outgoing, yes?
In Mail.app V8.2, shipped with MacOS 10.10.2, Mail.app offers an opportunity to set up a second distinct SMTP server (in the above example, for [email protected]) but the text boxes for username and password refuse to accept text. Is this just my experience, a local problem? Or is it observed by others? If so… a new way of enforcing sharing of SMTP setups, or a bug?
I'm very curious about the long-term Mail.app design philosophy in this regard, but this is not just curiosity: I'm having trouble with multiple email accounts after upgrading to 10.10.2 In each case, when I try to set up multiple accounts on a single mail server.
I've done quite a bit of searching for explanations of mail.app's design, without success. It is very possible I've missed some relevant explanations. If so, please provide links and accept my apologies.
TIA

Duplicate IR through parallel processing for automated ERS

Hi,
We got duplicate IR issue in production when running the parallel processing for automated ERS job. This issue is not happening in every time. Once in a while the issue happeing. That means the issue has happened in June month as twice. What could be the reasons to got this issue. On those days the job took more time comaredt o general. We are unable to replicate the same scenareo. When i am testing the job is creating IRs successfully. Provide me the reasons for this.

Wow - long post to say "can I use hardware boxes as inserts?" and the answer is yes, and you have been able to for a long time.
I don't know why you're doing some odd "duplicated track" thing... weird...
So, for inserts of regular channels, just stick Logic's I/O plug on the channel. Tell it which audio output you want it to send to, and which audio input to receive from. Patch up the appropriate ins and outs on your interface to your hardware box/patchbay/mixer/whatever and bob's your uncle.
You can also do this on aux channels, so if you want to send a bunch of tracks to a hardware reverb, you'd put the I/O plug on the aux channel you're using in the same way as described above. Now simply use the sends on each channel you want to send to that aux (and therefore hardware reverb).
Note you'll need to have software monitoring turned on.
Another way is to just set the output of a channel or aux to the extra audio outputs on your interface, and bring the outputs of your processing hardware back into spare inputs and feed them into the Logic mix using input objects.
Lots of ways to do it in Logic.
And no duplicate recordings needed...
I still don't understand why the Apple-developers didn't think of including such a plug-in, because it could allow amazing routing possibilities, like in this case, you could send the audio track to the main output(1-2 or whatever) BUT also to alternate hardware outputs, so you can use a hardware reverb unit, + a hardware delay unit etc...to which the audio track is being sent , and then you could blend the results back in Logic more easily.
You can just do this already with mixer routing alone, no plugins necessary.

Unplanned depreciation negative in Derived depr area ECC 6.0

We are trying to post unplanned depreciation in Book1 using ttype 641 and the system is not allowing us to post, as we have a derived depreciation area for
Book vs Macrs..
The message is AA639
Unplanned depreciation is negative in area 25.....Where area 25 is the derived depreciation area.
Any suggestions to overcome this as we only want to post to book1.
Thank you

Dear members of this forum,
please have a look at rules of engagement:
Do not ask for points - This forum should be firstly about information exchange; points are an incentive and a way of saying thanks.
Asking for points is like asking someone to say "thank you": The only time we do this in real life is when teaching a child good manners.
Saying it to an adult is insulting, so why do it in the forums? If someone keeps asking questions without awarding points, simply stop answering them or use the abuse button to report it
Best regards
Horst

Creating Planned Independent Requirements for an MRP Area.

Hi All,
I am trying to enter Planned Independent Requirements for an MRP Area, with requirement type VSE and I get the following error;
"Only stock requirements are allowed when planning at MRP area level".
I can enter at the Plant level with no problems.
Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
Kevin.

The following is the excerpt from SAP [Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/81/470a58ddab11d1b55b0000e82de178/frameset.htm] I think you maintained a planning strategy in the MRP view (for the plant) which doesn't support VSE.
You can delete PIRs from an MRP area by deleting the MRP area number from the Creating Planned Independent Requirements screen and recompiling.
When you define the planning strategies and parameters in the material master, these parameters apply to the whole plant, including all the MRP areas within the plant: You cannot maintain the MRP areas separately.
The integration of the MRP area and the assignment of the MRP area in the sales order is supported only by a user exit in the sales and distribution user exit pool.
Sales orders with MRP areas are created irrespective of the availability check control group in the material master.
Customer order processing of production sales orders with the item category (account assignment Step E Single) is only maintained in the MRP area of the plant.
In Customizing and in the MRP area user exit, make sure that when transferring individual sales orders, only requirements types KE, KEK, KEKS, KET, KELV, KEV, KEVV, VSEF, and VSE are generated.
The following requirements types are valid for the MRP area: KE, KEK, KEKS, KET, KELV, KEV, KEVV, VSEF, and VSE.
You cannot plan with preliminary planning materials in the MRP area.
There is no planning strategy for the material segment of the MRP area.
The planning strategy for the material master segment of the plant is assigned to the material segment of the MRP area.
The consumption mode and the periods of adjustment are derived from the plant in the MRP area of the material master.
Only consumption customer requirements with planned independent requirements are allowed: VSF requirements with KSV and VSFB with KSV.

How can i write a vi in using parallel port for digital inputs

Dear all,
i am a beginner user of LabVIEW and i want to write a vi in using parallel port for digital I/O. After reading the article "Using the Parallel Port in LabVIEW
" and download the parallel.zip, i know how to write the vi for output, but i still don't know how to write the input one.i've try to use a Inport.vi to test, but nothing change when i set pin2-9 to high. (my computer:win2K & LabVIEW 6.1)
Can anybody teach me how to write it?
Can anyone write the vi for me too?
Thanks all!
p.s.i've already install the "accessHW.exe"

Are you using VISA or the accessHW VIs? You may need to goto the bios and set the parallel port to run in spp mode or standard mode. This is the simpliest configuration and where you should start.
As far as writing the VI goes, just copy the diagram out of the tutorial you mentioned.

Parallels Server For Mac configuration (or any VM product), best practices

What is the recommended practice for configuring Parallels Server For Mac on an XServe? The xserve has 3 hard drive bays. What do most people do to maximize uptime, failover, disaster recovery, etc. We do have 3 different physical xserves with PSfM also.
Is a software RAID recommended for the boot OS drive? for the drive storing the VMs if not the same drive?
How are your hard drives configured?
I'm concerned that mirroring two 1TB hard drives and using that for both the host OS and for the VMs will present problems:
When creating new VMs, copying large amounts of data, etc, I'd guess that moving 10-100 GB of data is tasking for the software raid and will noticeably affect performance for all VMs.
If one of the mirrored drives fails and the raid needs to be rebuilt, this probably would bring the entire system to a crawl, at best, and possibly be unusable while it works to repair the raid. Thus it would have to be done during off peak hours. This would prevent a complete outage though.
are these correct assumptions?

Hello there,
There is no upgrade path from Server 2012 Essentials to R2. R2 is not an upgrade, it is a new build. Essentials does not upgrade easily, you will want to perform a migration of the server. This will require additional hardware. You
can possibly backup the 2012 Essentials, build a temp server on workstation hardware just to do the migration from, restore the backup to the new server and then perform the migration to R2.

Parallel Currecy for derived depreication area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for