Parallel valuation deactiviation problem

I define in spro for parallel valuation posting rule and document type ZX , after that I run askbn, and post some document.
now I find I can't  deactiviate parallel val. in asset accounting, i have multiple depreciation area.
error below when I try to remove document type ZX for company code I001,
(1)Number range  has not been created for document type .
Message no. AA738
Diagnosis
No valid number range interval has been created for document type .
Procedure
Specify an interval for number range  in the year 999 for company code .
(2) error 2:
Create document number range  with external number assignment
Message no. APERB007
Diagnosis
Processing was terminated since the document number range  for year 23.09.2011 is set up for internal number assignment.
System Response
You have to enter a document number range with external number assignment for periodic posting of asset values, since the document numbers are not assigned by Financial Accounting, but by the posting program of Asset Accounting. External number assignment should therefore not be equated with manual number assignment. In this case, it means instead that number assignment is external from the point of view of Financial Accounting.
Procedure
Change number range  from internal to external number assignment in Customizing for Asset Accounting. Or check the document type entered.
but I already assign number range 31 (external number range) for document type ZX. so how to remove?

Hi,
I already mentioned below:
but I already assign number range 31 (external number range) for document type ZX.
I already flag external number range

Similar Messages

  • [FSCM] add parallel valuation area and new valuation classes

    Hi, everyone
    I have a plan to add parallel valuation area and new (general) valuation class for International Financial Reporting Standards. But I have no experience adding another valuation area. Basically, SAP says new valuation area could be added any time. The concept of parallel valuation area also support that. But I am concerning that there could be a problem technically. Even though there would be a problem when I try to transfer valuation class of new valuation area.
    If someone has an experience with these problems, please let me know and prepare that.
    Thanks.
    Best regards.
    Minsun Joo

    OX14 - Define Valuation Area (Tick one only- Once your system go live, no more changes)
                 Most company take the SAP recommended choice - Value Material Stock at Plant level
                 Value Material Stock at Plant or Company Level
              o If you valuate material stocks at plant level, the plant is the  valuation area.
              o If you valuate material stocks at company code level, the company code is the valuation area.
              o The decision you make applies to the whole client.
    Kesh

  • Treasury Money Markets- Operative Valuation Area and Parallel Valuation Are

    Hello Folks
    I have a problem I am trying to fix in Treasury Money Markets. The guys that created the fixed term deposits in Money markets did not create them in the Operative Valuation area. They created them in the Parallel Valuation area and went ahead to initialize it, they deleted the operative valuation area. Now the problem came in when new transactions were created. In the process of creation they asked for the operative Valuation area i.e. the new transactions being created. This was then created, but now the problem comes in settling and posting of the old transactions that have matured. These do not exist in the Operative Valuation area.
    I can’t post anything using TBB1 for the old transactions that were created without the operative valuation area, the system dumps and from the analysis I can see that it’s the lack of the operative valuation area. For the new transactions being created, a payment request cannot be generated for transactions requiring one.
    How can I make sure that the Transactions in the Parallel valuation area also exist in the operative valuation area? Has anyone ever had this problem? Any suggestions on how I can go about solving this problem?
    Regards
    Valentine

    Hi,
    I assume the valuation area you are asking about is in transaction manager component only.  Technically all valuation areas are same in the sense that they have the same functionality.  But from a functional stand point, every valuation area is determined based on either different accounting principles or different valuation needs.  For e.g. one valuation area can be for your local GAAP while one can be for IFRS.  It all depends on the business requirements whether you need multiple valuation areas at all or you can use one itself.
    By default 1 valuation area is required and hence 001 will be active and this will be your operative valuation area.  Any other valuation are you define will be parallel valuation area.  Now if you dont want other valuation areas, then you need not create them.  In your system, if you have been using 004 as for lets say IFRS and after upgrading you can configure 001 according to IFRS itself if you dont want VA according to any other GAAP.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Material Ledger Conversion in a Parallel Valuation Scenario

    Hi All,
    I'm working in a scenario where the Material Ledger is already active (without multiple currencies - in other words, with the local currency).
    We would like to activate parallel valuation introducing a new currency type (group currency).
    We have already read SAP Note 120380 - "Subsequent activation of multiple valuation approaches" where the preservation of ML historical data would involve a SAP intervention.
    It is not clear which kind of activities SAP should do in order to preserve ML historical data, i.e. which kind of data should be involved in a potential ML conversion data process.
    Any help will be GREATLY appreciated.
    Regards, ALDO26X1

    Hi Udo,
    first of all thanks very much for your answer.
    As described in the note 120380 we are in the following scenario:
    The ML is already active (without multiple currencies - in other words, with the local currency)
    B) You now require historical data: In this scenario, you must set a new currency key in the ML tables. The fields are filled as start
    values with the posted transaction data in local currency (depending on the currency, either transferred or translated). This procedure is
    very complicated and can be carried out on a project basis only. Contact SAP if you want to do this.
    Unfortunately it is not clear which kind of impacts this procedure would have on the actual data and which are the new values introduced (only stock values in the new group currency for MM periods?).
    Thanks for you cooperation.
    Kind regards, ALDO26X1

  • Material price changes in parallel valuation

    Hi experts,
    i have an issue with Material Ledger. in our client organisation, ML is active and there are materials with price determination indicator set to 3 and with  price control indicator 'S' in the material masters.
    However over a period of time, the parallel valuation for most materials display different values. it is essentially due to lack of knowledge on the part of users and indiscrete use of CKMM for change of price control indicator from 3 to 2 and vice versa.
    Now the business is serious to correct this situation. My questions in this regard are;
            a. what is the best source (table name) from down loading the material prices in different valuation views for a given period
            b. what precautions should we need to take to make changes (manual changes or mark and release of standard cost estimates) for these materials for all the valuation views to the prices ( i have gone through the SAP note 190707.
            c. what will be implications of making such changes on the financial balances of the organisation.
    Please give me a comprehensive picture of these aspects as monetary value at stake is quite significant for the client.
    Regards,
    Rao

    a. Use CKMLHD & CKMLCR
    b. Make Price Determination Binding in OMX1, once you are done with your changes in CKMM
    c. CKMM program tells you whats the financial impact...still you want to play safe...get a copy of production and try it out to see the impact

  • How to activate parallel valuation for SAPBanking Loan ?

    Hi, I'd like to know how to activate parallel valuation for SAPBanking Loan.
    When I deal general loan contract with bank, I have to customize FS-CML,
    however any other treasury deals are handled in FSCM (e.g. secrities, money-market, foreign exchange and delivatives).
    FS-CML doesn't have parallel valuation functions in its own.
    So, I think I must customize both FS-CML and FSCM.
    I'll wait for your kind answer. Thank you.
    Yugo

    Hi
    It is not possible to activate in such case, u should not have any stock.
    With regards
    Pavan

  • Operative and Parallel Valuation

    Hi All:
    I cannot get my head around this and I am sure someone can explain it -- what are the differences between Operative and Parallel Valuation?
    I am a technical guy, who is not involved into Finance, especially GL areas. But what see so far is both these areas are used to revaluate deals and only difference I see is that parallel valuation creates entries during re-valuation for each individual line item; while operative does one per transaction.
    If that is not critical, technically I should be able to create only one valuation area, and that should be operative area (001)
    Little bit of background info: we are moving from R3 to ECC6. in ECC6, operative valuation is a mandatory and it has to be setup. While on R3, my client had only parallel area (004). so I don't see a point of mapping both valuation areas in ECC. I should be able to get away with 001. Am I correct?
    Thanks,
    JS

    Hi,
    I assume the valuation area you are asking about is in transaction manager component only.  Technically all valuation areas are same in the sense that they have the same functionality.  But from a functional stand point, every valuation area is determined based on either different accounting principles or different valuation needs.  For e.g. one valuation area can be for your local GAAP while one can be for IFRS.  It all depends on the business requirements whether you need multiple valuation areas at all or you can use one itself.
    By default 1 valuation area is required and hence 001 will be active and this will be your operative valuation area.  Any other valuation are you define will be parallel valuation area.  Now if you dont want other valuation areas, then you need not create them.  In your system, if you have been using 004 as for lets say IFRS and after upgrading you can configure 001 according to IFRS itself if you dont want VA according to any other GAAP.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Initialization of Parallel Valuation Area

    Hi All,
    what is initialization of parallel valuation area setting and what is the key date needs to be used here.
    Regards,
    Andy

    Hi Ravi,
    I have maintained Valution area 099 for co code XYZ, It already had valuation area 001.
    step by step..gng to TRM- Tr Mgr-Gen Settngs- Acc- Org
    1) define val area : 099 defined
    2)assgmt of valuation areas to co code -defined new val rea for xyz ( it already had for 001)
    3) *** of gen valuation class to specific class - defined here 099
    4) assign position mgt proceedures- assignd the valuation class 099 for the product used
    when i create the transaction it gives me following error
    TRL initialization for Securities, co. code XYZ, valn area 099 is not yet
    complete
    in  Initialization of Parallel Valuation area : it is giving Country key not defined
    pls help

  • Parallel Valuation Issue

    Hi Experts,
    In TRM, I have configured three valuation area. 001 for Operative Valuation and 002 and 003 are for parallel valuation. After some time, I was not requiring Parallel valuation 003. therefore I have deleted the same. while doing my TBB1 posting,  The deletion resulted in Error message like a short dump and it was getting logged out from TBB1
    To fix that, I have went to Initialize Parallel valuation step, Executed Fast Entry for both Parallel Valuation 003, then i was able to post my transaction in TBB1, But i am finding the entries are coming only for Valuation Area 001 which is Operative Valuation and not coming for Valuation Area 002 Parallel Valuation.
    I appreciate any kind of guidance or direction from you on my issue
    Ganesh

    Hi Ganesh,
    I am currently having similar trouble with TBB1 where I receive error message below:
    TRL intialization for MM, FX, Derivatives, co. code WTRD, valn area 003 is not yet complete
    Message no. TPM_TRL052
    Are you familiar with this issue? any help would be greatly appreciated! i hope that you can help..

  • Parallel valuation area in CFM

    HI FSCM Gurus,
    Can anyone tell me what all settings are required activate the Parallel Valuation area in CFM.
    Thanx in advance...
    Useful answers would be definitely rewarded.
    Cheers
    Megha

    Dear Megha,
    In Corporate Finance Management, you depict parallel valuation methods using the valuation (depreciation) area. This means that you have to define a valuation area for each of your accounting principles.
    The results of the valuations are posted separately by valuation area. For each valuation area, you can decide whether you want the postings to be made to the general ledger or to an additional ledger.
    Features:Each valuation area provides you with various classifications that you can use to depict the various valuation rules in the individual accounting principles.
    Financial assets: You can divide your financial assets into various valuation classes.
    Structure of stocks: You can set the structure of your stocks using characteristics (terms used for differentiation purposes).
    Financial products: For certain financial products, you can activate single position management (lot accounting) with various consumption sequence procedures.
    You control valuation of your stock using position management procedures that you can assign to stocks depending on the valuation area, valuation class and other characteristics. In the position management procedure, the legally binding valuation approach is defined for valuating a stock (such as lowest value principle or key date valuation).
    Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points and let me know if you need anything specific.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Parallel Valuation Area Initialization Question

    Our Treasury configuration was originally not set to post to our parallel valuation area.  For the past few months we have been doing Journal Entries to true-up the parallel ledger to the operative ledger.  I have completed the configuration to post to the parallel area, however, when executing TPM_Initialize the system want to post old flows to the parallel ledger.  Is there a way to not post these flows to the parallel ledger since we've already taken care of these postings with JE's?  Thanks!

    Hi,
    If you want to use parallel valuation areas, then initializing the flows has to be done.  Give a key date before you started posting JE for the parallel ledger.  It will post only before the key date.
    Or try excluding your product categories from initialization by specifying the product categories in the exclusion list.
    Instead specify the update types for initialization as not relevant for posting.  This will ensure that the treasury subledger will be correct while no G/L entries would be generated.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Processing payment in Parallel Valuation areas

    Hi gurus,
    from business point of view, you trigger payments only from Operative valuation area (001), which means in SAP, that:
    - (step 1) first you post respective flows (TBB1), which results in some open items on Open G/L account (one clearing accont) or Customer subledger;
    - (step 2) then you execute payemnt program (F111 or F110), which results in clearing of previous open item (in step 1) and creates new open item on respective bank subaccount (depends on Master data of Business partner - SI: payment details);
    - (step 3) and last you receive your bank statement, representing confirmation of executed payment. Then you of course post bank account vs bank subaccount and clear the last one.
    However, my question is  - do you need to follow the same 3 steps for Parallel Valuation areas? Or instead at the beggining you only post to Operative Valuation area (at TBB1), when execute payment run (F111), process bank statement and only after that update Parallel Valuation areas, without steps 2 and 3 (described above). How then it's possible to achieve such functionality, that posting (TBB1) would directly affect respective bank account (vs posting over clearing account and subaccount) - do you need another posting specifications, assigned to payment relevant update types in Parallel Valuation areas and another account symbol, representing Bank account direcly or some other solutions?
    Appreciate your advise.
    Rgds,
    Renatas

    Hi Prasad,
    thanks for your reply.
    I pretty understand the idea of Parallel Valuation areas.
    However, if you say that you don't post to GL with TTB1 (I mean those Update types are marked as not relevant for posting) in the Parallel Valuation areas, so my question is how you will get your update of GL accounts in those non-leading leadgers and create required Balance Sheet ? Let's say, you placed deposit of 1.000 EUR with some bank with start date 24/04/20XX, so TBB1 should produce such kind of posting in Leading ledger:
    Debit /// Position Money market (Asset side of Balance)    /// 1.000 EUR /// Posting date 24/04/20XX
    Credit /// Bank clearing accoount (Asset side of Balance) /// 1.000 EUR /// Posting date 24/04/20XX
    Rgds,
    Renatas

  • Parallel port printing problem

    I was printing quite fine on LaserJet 2100 (I was even surprised how easily I've set it all up, thought it woudl be more compliacted). I even tried different drivers, all worked fine so far. Now I acquired LaserJet 2200 which has USB in addition to LPT so I can print on my desktop via USB and on laptop via LPT.
    I'll have USB cable no sooner than tomorrow so I tried to print on LPT on the 2200 as for now. But only strange line of letters came out every time and the printing job never finished, it was still printing the same crappy line of some stuff again and again. I even deleted all the 2100 printers I have set up and added only the 2200 but it was still the same.
    So I wanted to try at least the refiled toner (I bought 5 these toners and the 2200 was extra bonus) on my 2100 so I added it. But what, the same problem. When I try test pages, there comes something like lines of settings for the printer and it still wants to print infinite. I noticed there is 5012 error in HPLIPS. I tried setting the printers up in CUPS and HPLIP also, under root and normal user, still the same for both. Reinstalling HPLIP didn't help, different drivers behave the same way. What's wrong? Printers should be fine, testing page directly on them cames out good.
    Even it worked before without being in lp group, I added myself to it, but I still get the same communication error. I'll also look for another parallel cable, but that would be strange, the cable was working before - I've printed several hundred pages in past few weeks.
    ADD// tried USB printer (2200), printed under Win 7 on desktop and Arch on laptop (not flawlessly, I did not succeed in printing with EconoMode under any of the systems), however using the parallel it behaved the same crappy way. I could not print now because I disassembled the 2200 little too much during process of changing some moving (rubber) parts between the two. Now 2100 works, 2200 blinks all the time…
    Last edited by Behemot (2011-03-18 10:24:04)

    Behemot wrote:Tried under XP, same problem, so I got another LPT cable somewhere -> print good under XP. Tried under Arch, some strange stuff, changed HP driver for HPCUPS, LJ 2100 prints fine.
    Have you considered the fact that there may be something wrong with the printer and/or connection?

  • Parallel Port Listener problem

    hello everyone,
    I have downloaded the javax.comm package and installed it as given in the installation instructions. I can print my files using the javax.comm classes. But i do not get the Parallel Port Event even if i register a listener.
    Also for all the methods such as is PrinterError(), isPrinterTimedOut(), isPaperOut() etc i do not get anything else but flase. Even if the printer is online or not, or if the paper is out etc, in all cases only false is returned by these methods. Please tel me what could be the problem.
    All these methods return false even when the printer is online or not :
    parallelPort.isPrinterBusy()
    parallelPort.isPrinterError()
    parallelPort.isPrinterSelected()parallelPort.isPrinterTimedOut()
    parallelPort.isPaperOut()

    Well, i think you should be looking for specs about the printer(s) to find out how they communicate with windows. That might not be that easy because not all company's will be very open about that. You should realise that any message windows gives you about the printerstatus comes to you via the drivers for that printer. The drivers know how to communicate with the printer, and that's different per printer.
    The most used standard for printing is Postscript (I believe HP6L is a postscript printer) wich is supported by the 'bigger' printers. There will be info about Postscript on the web, but it is owned by Adobe and I son't know how free the specs are...
    An older dot matrix printer is more likely to be using the lines that are signal out busy, error etc. You will find the pin layout here: http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ih/doc/par/doc/regpins.html
    If all your after is printing your files you might want to use java.awt.PrintJob wich will let you print through the spooler of the operating system, thus letting the OS handle the printer with the right drivers.

  • Parallel port access problem

    Hi all!
    I'm trying to communicate with parallel port using the commapi version 2. Unfortunately, the api doesn't accept any other mode than SPP mode that is read-only. When I try to change the parallel port mode, I got an UnsupportedCommOperationException. I'm working with windows xp.
    Does anybody have an idea?
    Thanks!
    Thiago

    I have same problem...
    No one more have solve this?
    I alread have tried use RXTX library..
    but I have:
    java.io.IOException: The device is not connected.
    I think that pass-motor don't have correct response for pararell protocol (I need use it with direct write, no ack signal, no read, etc)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to print book - error with page info

    I'm trying to print a 50 page book. No problem assembling, uploading or purchasing but after a day or two I always get the following message from the Apple store. Due to an error when your order was submitted, the file we received contains incorrect

  • Does iTunes 11 supports 5.1 Speakers?

    Does iTunes 11 supports 5.1 Speakers? If yes which all speakers does it support and how to activate it on iTunes?I am able to play music in 5.1 surround mode using other players such as WMP 11, VLC, GOMP, WINAMP but when I play music using iTunes it

  • Hp pavilion all-in-one wanting to multi-moni​tor

    I have a HP Pavilion All-in-one and am wanting to multi(dual monitor), for webcasting purposes of a co-host show(co-host's in diff locations) was told i would need to dual monitor and "highjack" skype. i would like to have live video of co-host as we

  • Dash board report

    Hi Do we have any reports which will be having dash board kind of thing similar to what we have in Create Periodic Declarations in ENGR T-code. I need to have two panes the left one shows the countries in tree structure and the right with the corresp

  • Illustrator CS3 13.0.1 won't install

    Hey, Tried searching all over the internet for help with this. I can't get Adobe Illustrator CS 13.0.1 to install. It always fails and says it wants to install Rosetta (I don't want to install Rosetta). Any ideas over here? Thanks.