Parallel Valuation Issue

Hi Experts,
In TRM, I have configured three valuation area. 001 for Operative Valuation and 002 and 003 are for parallel valuation. After some time, I was not requiring Parallel valuation 003. therefore I have deleted the same. while doing my TBB1 posting,  The deletion resulted in Error message like a short dump and it was getting logged out from TBB1
To fix that, I have went to Initialize Parallel valuation step, Executed Fast Entry for both Parallel Valuation 003, then i was able to post my transaction in TBB1, But i am finding the entries are coming only for Valuation Area 001 which is Operative Valuation and not coming for Valuation Area 002 Parallel Valuation.
I appreciate any kind of guidance or direction from you on my issue
Ganesh

Hi Ganesh,
I am currently having similar trouble with TBB1 where I receive error message below:
TRL intialization for MM, FX, Derivatives, co. code WTRD, valn area 003 is not yet complete
Message no. TPM_TRL052
Are you familiar with this issue? any help would be greatly appreciated! i hope that you can help..

Similar Messages

  • Material price changes in parallel valuation

    Hi experts,
    i have an issue with Material Ledger. in our client organisation, ML is active and there are materials with price determination indicator set to 3 and with  price control indicator 'S' in the material masters.
    However over a period of time, the parallel valuation for most materials display different values. it is essentially due to lack of knowledge on the part of users and indiscrete use of CKMM for change of price control indicator from 3 to 2 and vice versa.
    Now the business is serious to correct this situation. My questions in this regard are;
            a. what is the best source (table name) from down loading the material prices in different valuation views for a given period
            b. what precautions should we need to take to make changes (manual changes or mark and release of standard cost estimates) for these materials for all the valuation views to the prices ( i have gone through the SAP note 190707.
            c. what will be implications of making such changes on the financial balances of the organisation.
    Please give me a comprehensive picture of these aspects as monetary value at stake is quite significant for the client.
    Regards,
    Rao

    a. Use CKMLHD & CKMLCR
    b. Make Price Determination Binding in OMX1, once you are done with your changes in CKMM
    c. CKMM program tells you whats the financial impact...still you want to play safe...get a copy of production and try it out to see the impact

  • Valuated issued value Stock

    Valuated issued value Stock
    I want to check the values of BW & r/3 are matching for KF  Valuated issued value Stock in which t-c0de can i check it
    I am checking valuated stock value in mc.5
    & valuated stock received value in  table s031
    these values are matching but when I check  Valuated issued value Stock in mc.6 some of the values ar ematching & some are not matching

    Hello Maya,
      Use transaction MB5B  where you can select stock by date.Also select Valuated stock. This should match the  your KFs in BW,
    Um is needed to get correct value of the stock
    If the material cost is adjusted in R/3 then revaluation entries are posted in R/3. The UM datasource picks up these revaluation entries.
    Jaya

  • Parallel Caching Issue

    We have found issues with the parallel loading of the OLAP cache using reporting agent jobs where entries are not populated correctly.We rely on the OLAP cache for delivering the very high levels of concurrency during the peak times.
    Once the main batch data loading has been completed we run some background reporting agent jobs to pre-populate the OLAP cach.Each job contains a web application template that holds 1 or more queries and will process 1500+ stores for each run.
    We have different reporting agent jobs for the different web application templates, but we have discovered that if we run these jobs in parallel we do not get the full benefit of the OLAP cache compared to if we run them sequentially.
    If we run the jobs in parallel, when we look in RSRCACHE for these queries it would appear to have populated correctly, but when we check RSDDSTATS for the query performance the following day, we can see that a large number of the
    stores still hit the database and did not benefit from the cache entries. Sometime this can be as much as 60% failure to hit the cache.
    If we run the same job sequentially, then check RSDDSTATS the following
    day, we can see 100% success rate with every store hitting the OLAP cache.
    Is anyone able to advise how we can resolve this parallel caching issue?

    Hi Ganesh,
    I am currently having similar trouble with TBB1 where I receive error message below:
    TRL intialization for MM, FX, Derivatives, co. code WTRD, valn area 003 is not yet complete
    Message no. TPM_TRL052
    Are you familiar with this issue? any help would be greatly appreciated! i hope that you can help..

  • Parallel valuation deactiviation problem

    I define in spro for parallel valuation posting rule and document type ZX , after that I run askbn, and post some document.
    now I find I can't  deactiviate parallel val. in asset accounting, i have multiple depreciation area.
    error below when I try to remove document type ZX for company code I001,
    (1)Number range  has not been created for document type .
    Message no. AA738
    Diagnosis
    No valid number range interval has been created for document type .
    Procedure
    Specify an interval for number range  in the year 999 for company code .
    (2) error 2:
    Create document number range  with external number assignment
    Message no. APERB007
    Diagnosis
    Processing was terminated since the document number range  for year 23.09.2011 is set up for internal number assignment.
    System Response
    You have to enter a document number range with external number assignment for periodic posting of asset values, since the document numbers are not assigned by Financial Accounting, but by the posting program of Asset Accounting. External number assignment should therefore not be equated with manual number assignment. In this case, it means instead that number assignment is external from the point of view of Financial Accounting.
    Procedure
    Change number range  from internal to external number assignment in Customizing for Asset Accounting. Or check the document type entered.
    but I already assign number range 31 (external number range) for document type ZX. so how to remove?

    Hi,
    I already mentioned below:
    but I already assign number range 31 (external number range) for document type ZX.
    I already flag external number range

  • Material Ledger Conversion in a Parallel Valuation Scenario

    Hi All,
    I'm working in a scenario where the Material Ledger is already active (without multiple currencies - in other words, with the local currency).
    We would like to activate parallel valuation introducing a new currency type (group currency).
    We have already read SAP Note 120380 - "Subsequent activation of multiple valuation approaches" where the preservation of ML historical data would involve a SAP intervention.
    It is not clear which kind of activities SAP should do in order to preserve ML historical data, i.e. which kind of data should be involved in a potential ML conversion data process.
    Any help will be GREATLY appreciated.
    Regards, ALDO26X1

    Hi Udo,
    first of all thanks very much for your answer.
    As described in the note 120380 we are in the following scenario:
    The ML is already active (without multiple currencies - in other words, with the local currency)
    B) You now require historical data: In this scenario, you must set a new currency key in the ML tables. The fields are filled as start
    values with the posted transaction data in local currency (depending on the currency, either transferred or translated). This procedure is
    very complicated and can be carried out on a project basis only. Contact SAP if you want to do this.
    Unfortunately it is not clear which kind of impacts this procedure would have on the actual data and which are the new values introduced (only stock values in the new group currency for MM periods?).
    Thanks for you cooperation.
    Kind regards, ALDO26X1

  • How to activate parallel valuation for SAPBanking Loan ?

    Hi, I'd like to know how to activate parallel valuation for SAPBanking Loan.
    When I deal general loan contract with bank, I have to customize FS-CML,
    however any other treasury deals are handled in FSCM (e.g. secrities, money-market, foreign exchange and delivatives).
    FS-CML doesn't have parallel valuation functions in its own.
    So, I think I must customize both FS-CML and FSCM.
    I'll wait for your kind answer. Thank you.
    Yugo

    Hi
    It is not possible to activate in such case, u should not have any stock.
    With regards
    Pavan

  • Operative and Parallel Valuation

    Hi All:
    I cannot get my head around this and I am sure someone can explain it -- what are the differences between Operative and Parallel Valuation?
    I am a technical guy, who is not involved into Finance, especially GL areas. But what see so far is both these areas are used to revaluate deals and only difference I see is that parallel valuation creates entries during re-valuation for each individual line item; while operative does one per transaction.
    If that is not critical, technically I should be able to create only one valuation area, and that should be operative area (001)
    Little bit of background info: we are moving from R3 to ECC6. in ECC6, operative valuation is a mandatory and it has to be setup. While on R3, my client had only parallel area (004). so I don't see a point of mapping both valuation areas in ECC. I should be able to get away with 001. Am I correct?
    Thanks,
    JS

    Hi,
    I assume the valuation area you are asking about is in transaction manager component only.  Technically all valuation areas are same in the sense that they have the same functionality.  But from a functional stand point, every valuation area is determined based on either different accounting principles or different valuation needs.  For e.g. one valuation area can be for your local GAAP while one can be for IFRS.  It all depends on the business requirements whether you need multiple valuation areas at all or you can use one itself.
    By default 1 valuation area is required and hence 001 will be active and this will be your operative valuation area.  Any other valuation are you define will be parallel valuation area.  Now if you dont want other valuation areas, then you need not create them.  In your system, if you have been using 004 as for lets say IFRS and after upgrading you can configure 001 according to IFRS itself if you dont want VA according to any other GAAP.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Initialization of Parallel Valuation Area

    Hi All,
    what is initialization of parallel valuation area setting and what is the key date needs to be used here.
    Regards,
    Andy

    Hi Ravi,
    I have maintained Valution area 099 for co code XYZ, It already had valuation area 001.
    step by step..gng to TRM- Tr Mgr-Gen Settngs- Acc- Org
    1) define val area : 099 defined
    2)assgmt of valuation areas to co code -defined new val rea for xyz ( it already had for 001)
    3) *** of gen valuation class to specific class - defined here 099
    4) assign position mgt proceedures- assignd the valuation class 099 for the product used
    when i create the transaction it gives me following error
    TRL initialization for Securities, co. code XYZ, valn area 099 is not yet
    complete
    in  Initialization of Parallel Valuation area : it is giving Country key not defined
    pls help

  • [FSCM] add parallel valuation area and new valuation classes

    Hi, everyone
    I have a plan to add parallel valuation area and new (general) valuation class for International Financial Reporting Standards. But I have no experience adding another valuation area. Basically, SAP says new valuation area could be added any time. The concept of parallel valuation area also support that. But I am concerning that there could be a problem technically. Even though there would be a problem when I try to transfer valuation class of new valuation area.
    If someone has an experience with these problems, please let me know and prepare that.
    Thanks.
    Best regards.
    Minsun Joo

    OX14 - Define Valuation Area (Tick one only- Once your system go live, no more changes)
                 Most company take the SAP recommended choice - Value Material Stock at Plant level
                 Value Material Stock at Plant or Company Level
              o If you valuate material stocks at plant level, the plant is the  valuation area.
              o If you valuate material stocks at company code level, the company code is the valuation area.
              o The decision you make applies to the whole client.
    Kesh

  • Parallel valuation area in CFM

    HI FSCM Gurus,
    Can anyone tell me what all settings are required activate the Parallel Valuation area in CFM.
    Thanx in advance...
    Useful answers would be definitely rewarded.
    Cheers
    Megha

    Dear Megha,
    In Corporate Finance Management, you depict parallel valuation methods using the valuation (depreciation) area. This means that you have to define a valuation area for each of your accounting principles.
    The results of the valuations are posted separately by valuation area. For each valuation area, you can decide whether you want the postings to be made to the general ledger or to an additional ledger.
    Features:Each valuation area provides you with various classifications that you can use to depict the various valuation rules in the individual accounting principles.
    Financial assets: You can divide your financial assets into various valuation classes.
    Structure of stocks: You can set the structure of your stocks using characteristics (terms used for differentiation purposes).
    Financial products: For certain financial products, you can activate single position management (lot accounting) with various consumption sequence procedures.
    You control valuation of your stock using position management procedures that you can assign to stocks depending on the valuation area, valuation class and other characteristics. In the position management procedure, the legally binding valuation approach is defined for valuating a stock (such as lowest value principle or key date valuation).
    Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points and let me know if you need anything specific.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Parallel Valuation Area Initialization Question

    Our Treasury configuration was originally not set to post to our parallel valuation area.  For the past few months we have been doing Journal Entries to true-up the parallel ledger to the operative ledger.  I have completed the configuration to post to the parallel area, however, when executing TPM_Initialize the system want to post old flows to the parallel ledger.  Is there a way to not post these flows to the parallel ledger since we've already taken care of these postings with JE's?  Thanks!

    Hi,
    If you want to use parallel valuation areas, then initializing the flows has to be done.  Give a key date before you started posting JE for the parallel ledger.  It will post only before the key date.
    Or try excluding your product categories from initialization by specifying the product categories in the exclusion list.
    Instead specify the update types for initialization as not relevant for posting.  This will ensure that the treasury subledger will be correct while no G/L entries would be generated.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Treasury Money Markets- Operative Valuation Area and Parallel Valuation Are

    Hello Folks
    I have a problem I am trying to fix in Treasury Money Markets. The guys that created the fixed term deposits in Money markets did not create them in the Operative Valuation area. They created them in the Parallel Valuation area and went ahead to initialize it, they deleted the operative valuation area. Now the problem came in when new transactions were created. In the process of creation they asked for the operative Valuation area i.e. the new transactions being created. This was then created, but now the problem comes in settling and posting of the old transactions that have matured. These do not exist in the Operative Valuation area.
    I can’t post anything using TBB1 for the old transactions that were created without the operative valuation area, the system dumps and from the analysis I can see that it’s the lack of the operative valuation area. For the new transactions being created, a payment request cannot be generated for transactions requiring one.
    How can I make sure that the Transactions in the Parallel valuation area also exist in the operative valuation area? Has anyone ever had this problem? Any suggestions on how I can go about solving this problem?
    Regards
    Valentine

    Hi,
    I assume the valuation area you are asking about is in transaction manager component only.  Technically all valuation areas are same in the sense that they have the same functionality.  But from a functional stand point, every valuation area is determined based on either different accounting principles or different valuation needs.  For e.g. one valuation area can be for your local GAAP while one can be for IFRS.  It all depends on the business requirements whether you need multiple valuation areas at all or you can use one itself.
    By default 1 valuation area is required and hence 001 will be active and this will be your operative valuation area.  Any other valuation are you define will be parallel valuation area.  Now if you dont want other valuation areas, then you need not create them.  In your system, if you have been using 004 as for lets say IFRS and after upgrading you can configure 001 according to IFRS itself if you dont want VA according to any other GAAP.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Processing payment in Parallel Valuation areas

    Hi gurus,
    from business point of view, you trigger payments only from Operative valuation area (001), which means in SAP, that:
    - (step 1) first you post respective flows (TBB1), which results in some open items on Open G/L account (one clearing accont) or Customer subledger;
    - (step 2) then you execute payemnt program (F111 or F110), which results in clearing of previous open item (in step 1) and creates new open item on respective bank subaccount (depends on Master data of Business partner - SI: payment details);
    - (step 3) and last you receive your bank statement, representing confirmation of executed payment. Then you of course post bank account vs bank subaccount and clear the last one.
    However, my question is  - do you need to follow the same 3 steps for Parallel Valuation areas? Or instead at the beggining you only post to Operative Valuation area (at TBB1), when execute payment run (F111), process bank statement and only after that update Parallel Valuation areas, without steps 2 and 3 (described above). How then it's possible to achieve such functionality, that posting (TBB1) would directly affect respective bank account (vs posting over clearing account and subaccount) - do you need another posting specifications, assigned to payment relevant update types in Parallel Valuation areas and another account symbol, representing Bank account direcly or some other solutions?
    Appreciate your advise.
    Rgds,
    Renatas

    Hi Prasad,
    thanks for your reply.
    I pretty understand the idea of Parallel Valuation areas.
    However, if you say that you don't post to GL with TTB1 (I mean those Update types are marked as not relevant for posting) in the Parallel Valuation areas, so my question is how you will get your update of GL accounts in those non-leading leadgers and create required Balance Sheet ? Let's say, you placed deposit of 1.000 EUR with some bank with start date 24/04/20XX, so TBB1 should produce such kind of posting in Leading ledger:
    Debit /// Position Money market (Asset side of Balance)    /// 1.000 EUR /// Posting date 24/04/20XX
    Credit /// Bank clearing accoount (Asset side of Balance) /// 1.000 EUR /// Posting date 24/04/20XX
    Rgds,
    Renatas

  • Split valuation Issues in PO

    Hi Consultant,
    I have one issue with Split valuation -configuration. I have maintained all the configuration setting related to split valuation but whenever I will create PO system does not pick-up the price (different price based on the valuation type in material ) .
    The following configuration have done in IMG:
    i) Activated split valuation
    II) Maintain valuation category under this group in to three valuation types.
    III) Activate Plant, (assign into valuation type)
    Maintain condition table with key combination (material/plant/price/val.type)
    Assign into condition type PB00
    Maintain condition records in MEK1 (for this material)
    Maintained one header material with valuation category then same material has extended to different valuation types and prices.
    Is it necessary to maintain Info record for the split valuated material? 
    Why system does not valuate the price automatically based in the valuation type changes made in PO?
    Regards,
    Thiru

    Hi Consultant,
    I have one issue with Split valuation -configuration. I have maintained all the configuration setting related to split valuation but whenever I will create PO system does not pick-up the price (different price based on the valuation type in material ) .
    The following configuration have done in IMG:
    Hi, Thiru,
    Please check the settings for configuration of split valuation;
    If you want to use split valuation, activate the settings found in customizing for material management under
    Valuation and Account Assignment--> Split Valuation-->Activate Split Valuation
    Define valuation category and a valaution type.
    Valuation category determines the criteria for distinguishing between stocks.The valuation type decribes the possible features of the partial stocks.
    You define valuation category, valuation types and assignment of types to categories in customizing for material management
    Valuation and Account Assignment--> Split Valuation-->Configure  Split Valuation
    Also first check you material master record with MM03 by selecting the desired organization levels and see whether the valuation prices are showing as per desired valuation type.
    Also would like to add that info records are not required in split valuation.
    Regards,
    Tushar Patankar

Maybe you are looking for