Parameters are not created for M0001 feature

Hi Friends,
During Hiring activity in IT0002 after entering all the fields, while saving i got a warning message - parameters are not created in M0001 feature. Please give me your views & answers why i got this message.
Edited by: sharada vemula on Apr 4, 2010 11:31 AM

Hi,
Go to PE03 enter M0001
create a structure till Personal Area and enter **** unless you want to maintain Administrator group in here.
Hope this helps
Ajay

Similar Messages

Odata error: Parameters are not allowed for entity "calculationView" as it is not a calculation or analytical view

I have created scripted calculation view
I can add parameter in aforesaid calculation view
It fetches me right result
But when I am to call aforesaid calculation view from odata service I am getting following error:
ERROR      zcustsearch/services/AutoComplete.xsodata
           Parameters are not allowed for entity "calculationView" as it is not a calculation or analytical view.
Any solutions

Don't reference it via the catalog object. Otherwise only the runtime Column View will be seen. Instead you should specific the view as the repository object. This means no schema and use package path::view name. Like this example from the SHINE content:
service namespace "sap.hana.democontent.epmNext" {
   "sap.hana.democontent.epmNext.models::CV_SALESORDER_YEAR_COMPARISON"
    as "salesYear"
keys generate local "ID"
    aggregates always
    parameters via entity "InputParams";

Call items are not created for Org BP's when created from Campaigns

Hello All,
We are creating Campaigns for Org BP's and pushing them to channel Phone, which is creating call list but call items are not created for Org BP's.
Org BP's are maintained with Contact Person's, callling hours and phone number are maintained against contact person BP, but still call items are not created with in call list.
Please let me know if I miss any further steps.
Thanks,
Raj.

Hi Debasis,
You can delete the PDS by using /SAPAPO/CULL_RTO_DEL - Delete Production Data Structure . And recif the it to APO. You can use CURTO_CREATE for it.
For the error message /SAPAPO/OM_ERROR2 119 there are couple of OSS notes please check the same.
1648558 - CIF error: 'Mode linkage problem with primary resource'
1325227 - PDS-EXP: Mode linkage problem with primary resource
Regards,
RBrahmankar

Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders

Hi All,
when i convert the planned order to production order i got this massage popup coming Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders . please let me know this .

Hi,
One of major customization steps for the order type is missing. Run OPU3 and maintain settings for the order type you are using. You may copy settings from an older type.
Regards.

Purchase requisitions are not created for Component by MRP

Hi,
I have created planned orders for assy. When I run the MRP the purchase requisitions are not created by MRP for the components. If I check the planned order the components tab is showing all the raw materials list as per the BOM. The master data tab shows the BOM,Routing,Production version etc. But when I run the MRP the components planned orders/purchase requisitions are not created. There is no stocks available for the components in the plant, still the purchase requisition are not created by MRP.
I have tried in both transactions MD01 and MD02.
I could notice one thing. Supoose if I enter 31.12.2009 is the order finish date, the system creates exception mesage 10- Rescheduling in with proposed date 01.12.2009. Why the system is propsoing rescheduling in with date 01.12.2009 which past date.
Please sugest.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
I am using MRP type PD for assy and components. There is no planned orders for assy.
If I run MD02 the planned orders created for assy and purchase requisition are created for raw materials. But if I run MRP in MD01 neither the planned orders nor the purchase requisitions created.
I tried the Control keys NETCH,NEUPL but still the planned order and purchase requisitions are not created if I run using MD01.
Please suggest.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Profitability Segments are not created for Invoices

Hi Guru's
Can any one help on this ?
"Invoice Documents Profitability Segments are not created" can you please suggest me?
Thanks,
Aakash

Hi Aakash,
I think you are trying to integrate FICA with CO-PA and then getting the error.
The posting of a contract accounts A/R & A/P document in CO-PA is dependent on-
(a) Activation of the operating concern in the SPRO node Controlling → Profitability Analysis →
Structures → Define Operating Concern → Maintain Characteristics
and
(b) CO short account assignment of the contract in the SPRO Node Financial Accounting → Contract
Accounts Receivable and Payable → Basic Functions → Posting and Documents → Documents
→ Define Account Assignments for Automatic Postings → Store CO Short Account Assignments
for IS-U Contracts.
In here, the system only carries out the posting if the Profitability Segment Assigned selected in CO
account assignment.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Reservations are not creating for a stock item PO

Hi All,
I have an issue with reservations for a stock material PO,
Our's is extended classic scenario(BBP 3.0 & R/3 4.7), I have created a cart and approved the cart for a stock materials.
As per business process, for a stock materials reservations are to be created but here after cart approval, under follow on documents tab, I am not getting any reservation details except shoopping cart number and its approval status.
Can any one have idea on it?
Through me some light,
Thanks in advance,
Govardhan,V.

Hi. Reservations are not supported in extended classic.
Or at least they were not when I last asked SAP about 3 years ago.
Unless something has changed the only solution was to use the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI to deactivate extended classic if it is an item you want a reservation for.
You would then end up using the classic scenario for these reservation items only.
Regards,
Dave.

8dot3 filenames not created for Program Files and Program Files (x86)

Interesting issue we are realizing on Servers deployed from SCCM 2012. 8dot3names are not created for Program Files and Program Files (x86). they are created for other files/folders at the root of C and below Program Files and Program Files (x86). This is
causing issues when programs are installed and the path is then created with 8dot3 filenames for program files and program files (x86)

Arg. we just got bitten by this "feature", and it's affecting our security software stack (name starts with M and ends with ee), and some ancient crud too.
And found this, which suggests a logical reason for 8dot3name to not be present on servers, but, on clients, I think it's a rather gross assumption...
http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2012/11/13/windows-server-2012-file-server-tip-disable-8-3-naming-and-strip-those-short-names-too.aspx
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Help! Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"

I'm on a MacBook 13" mid 2010, OS X 10.7.5, I want to upgrade to OS X Mavericks. I have searched around for a few days, I find people with the same problem but can't really get the solution for it. I prefer not to reinstall OS X, I want to upgrade. I don't have boot camp or something just a 250 GB HD.
Well, while I'm trying to upgrade from the download from Apps Store, I open the installer, press continue then accepts the Terms.. then select Macintosh HD and click install, then an warning message shows up "Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"
As I've read the article that is included in the waring message i did try to install anyway because it say that I would be fine, but when i did try to install the installer starts and after like 3 minutes a window appears, Install Failed.
I've even try to make a installer on USB, both with the command in terminal and with Diskmaker, but it does not help.
It seems impossible to upgrade. Please Help me.

First, see the heading "What to do if the installer warns that no Recovery System can be created" in this support article. If you use Boot Camp, back up and delete the Windows partition using Boot Camp Assistant. Try the installation again.

Change number that are not created earlier accepted for change of BOM

Hi,
When i am going to change BOM it gives warning message "Enter change number, BOM has history requirement"
But my problem is when i put any number in field of change number it is allowing me to change the BOM.
It should not be accept any number that are not created earlier in the system. It must have to accept change number that is created for the history requirement for perticular material. kindly give your input on this issue.
Atul

Hi Atul,
Please refer the thread ECM-Problem with Change number in CS01 and CS02 Transactions
Thanks,
Rakesh J

Some features of Mac OS X Lion are not supported for the disk

At the beginning of the installation on my MacBook Pro (early 2008, non-unibody) this alert appeared. The disk is partitioned into three partitions: 1. = Photoshop-scratch, 2. = System, 3. = Bootcamp. It seems that this causes the system-message. What could be the reason for that: The Photoshop-partition or Bootcamp? Is it possible to erase just the PS-partition and then install Lion or do I have to reformat the disk?
Message was edited by: Stefan Gregor (... **** orthography ...)

OS X Lion: 'Some features of Mac OS X Lion are not supported for the disk (volume name)' appears during installation

CPS parameters are not getting updated in SAP

We have recently migrated our SAP and CPs servers, after that we are facing few CPS issues and it is affecting lot of key batch jobs. One typical example is given below.
CPS is supposed to trigger a job DD simulation, by copying the SOURCE_DATE_ID -1-Dec-2006 and modifies the parameters BUDAT and FAEDA_HIGH. The parameter FAEDA_HIGH is calculated as time.now()+ 5 working days as defined in the expression. When we try to run the job today with the date 24 Dec 2010, CPS has calculated the FAEDS_HIGH correctly as 2-Jan-2011. IN SAP the variant gets created but for the field FAEDA_HIGH the date value is not getting updated properly it is display some other date. (e.g) It is showing as 4-jan-2011, I removed the xpression and gave another date for the FAEDA_HIGH field as 10/01/2011, but in SAP it is not getting updated.
Has anyone faced similar kind of issue. share you experience
Regards,
Ramprasad.

Hi ,
PLease find attached out XBP version
XBP connection pool for SAP system ISU
XMI interface version           : 2.0
Since we have taken backup and restored the SAP Database, the CPs transport file already exists in the System.
Basically what happens is
So actually what is happening is, the CPS parameter FAEDS_HIGH expressions are not used for due date calculation.. CPS just copies the source date-id to target id and similarly for the due date based on the difference
source_id variant date 01-12-2006   due date 02-12-2006 ( Next day)
Target_id Variant date 25-12-2010 due date 26-12-21010 ( Next Day)
I tried changing the Source date id from 01-12-2006 to 24-12-2010.
Source Variant date 24-12-2010   due date 04-01-2011 ( 10 Days)
Target Variant date 25-12-2010 due date 05-01-2011 ( 10 Days)
Regards,
Ram

SSRS,MDX- Passed parameters are not hitting the main query in Dataset

I have created a SSRS report which has to accept two parameters i.e., store name, Date(to show sales on particular date) in report. which are working fine for me. but, those passed parameters are not hitting the main query in main Dataset. what ever i
pass in parameters, it is displaying all the rows(every city values). i think i am not correct in creating the statement in Main dataset query, to receive those 2 parameters into the main query. can anybody please help me how to create the statement
in main date set to display the results for the exact parameter i am passing(which has to be in MDX).
ram

Hi ramprasad74,
According to your description, you want to use parameter in the report, then after parameter values are selected, corresponding data will be displayed in the report. But the parameters do not work and all the rows are displayed.
To pass parameter to main report dataset, we need to define parameter for MDX query and assign parameter name same as SSRS report parameter. For detail information, please refer to the following steps:
Create a Dataset to retrieve data for Store name parameter.
Create Store name parameter, type name and prompt, set Date type to Text, check Allow multiple values check box, then select get values from the dataset.
Create a Dataset for Date parameter.
Create Date parameter, type name and prompt, set Date type to Date/Time, then select get values from the dataset.
Create a new dataset used to retrieve data for the report, add statement like below to the mdx query: {STRTOMEMBER(@Date)} * {STRTOSET (@Store_name)}.
In Query Designer pane, click Query Parameters and assign parameter name same as SSRS report parameter.
For more information about SSRS Report with Single and Multi Selection Parameter using MDX Query, please refer to the following blog:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/799265/SSRS-Report-with-Single-and-Multi-Selection-Parame
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.

Payable Invoice has not created for internal requisition. ( R12.1.3)

HI,
This is an issue where i am facing for which the invoice has not created for the internal requisition, whereas the Receivables Transaction has created automatically for the same internal SO.
Is there any way to find out the invoice, because i have again ran the Report "Create Inetrcompany AP invoice" and when i mchecked in the log it says 0 fetched invoice....
Kindly help me out to solve this issue,
Thanks in advance.
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
Did you check in AP_INVOICES_INTERFACE table if there are some records with INVOICE_NUM like '%AR invoice number%'?
If no records in the interface table - can you please, check by submitting the program without giving any input parameters?
Regards,
G V Ranjith

Exits with parameters are not displaying in CO Substitution

Hi there...
I am having this problem...I´ve created a CO substitution following all the steps involved, works fine when I define the parameter:
exits-param = c_exit_param_none in form GET_EXIT_TITLES
The transaction code OKC9 displays the exit with the field:
parameters = "No change"
but when I changed the parameters in my exit for use parameters:
exits-param = c_exit_param_field
After the activating and generating with RGUGBR00, the exit doesn´t display in exits availables in OKC9 in fact all the exits with using parameters are not displaying in OKC9.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks in advance!!!
Alfredo
Amber

Calibrate your monitor.

Parameters are not created for M0001 feature

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for