Part Appraisal column in appraisal document

Hi,
   In a template we have one appraise , one appraiser and one role as part appraiser...
In R/3 that part appraiser column is coming in the editable mode.. but in standard BSP itself that part appraisal column is coming in the display mode always//
is there any solution for this..?
i need that column in editable mode..

If in R/3 its coming in editable mode and only in BSP Page (HAP_DOCUMENT) its coming in Non-editabl emode, then I will ask you to check the Implementation for the BADI "HRHAP00_ACC_HEADER"....
Note -
1) The filter name (Filter created for the Implementation of the BADI) is assigned in the Appraisal Template as follow..
    Transaction PHAP_CATALOG -> Select the Template -> Processing Tab -> Further Template Behaviour -> Enhancement Area   
    name = "Header Access",
2) Inside this implemetation (hope you will find one in the step1, they case code with the UI_MODE, which differntiates BSP and R3

Similar Messages

  • Part appraisal document for self and subordinates

    Hi All
    I have created a part appraisal document , for self and sub ordinates. When I logged in to portal , the subordinates are able to view the document whereas document created for self are unable to. For self as well as for subordinates , we have configured the document in ESS only. It may be due to some powl query issue but am unable to identify if its powl issue or some authorization issue,In either case , how to identify the same. Please suggest.
    Thanks
    Smriti

    Hello Smriti,
    Can you clarify the issue for me - you have created one appraisal document and in the header data have defined the part appraisers as the employee and subordinates, and only the employee is unable to access the part appraisal document?
    When you created the appraisal template, on the 'Roles' tab, is the role for 'Self' ticked?
    Can the employee access any of his other appraisal documents from the portal?
    Is IT0105 data maintained for the employee's SY-UNAME?
    Regards,
    Kendall

  • Changing Header data in the part appraisal document

    I have implemented a BADI using the definition HRHAP00_ACC_HEADER. The next step is to ensure that at Category level the Changes to Part Appraisal enhancements is selected on the Enhancements tab page. However, the enhancement is not displayed in the tab selection - please tell me how to display it or do i need to add it to a specific table?

    Hello,
    the enhancement areas allowed under "further template behaviour" are:
    BA         Column Access
    BB         Pushbutton Access
    BC         Business Check
    D1         Default Appraiser
    D2         Default Appraisee
    DE         Default Execution Period
    DN         Default Appraisal Name
    DP         Default Part Appraiser
    DR         Default Review Date
    DV         Default Validity Period
    PM         Maximum Number of Part Appraisers
    So:
    1) choose one of these areas for your enhancement
    2)Locate this area in T77HAP_EX_AR, double click on it and add a new entry with the filter value for the BADI you want (note that the matchcode will not show it, but you can enter the name of the filter in field "enhancement". When you hit "enter" it will be recognized and the descriptive text will be automatically entered in field "text").
    3) Enable your enhancement at category level
    4) Select it from "further template behaviour" (you should add a row in the pop-up window, note that first the system asks for the enhancement area so be sure to choose the one you chose before in T77HAP_EX_AR).
    5) Enjoy!
    Hope it helps
    Regards,
    Rodrigo

  • PMS OSA - Part appraisal at any state

    Hi Experts,
    One of our requirement is to get feedback from part appraisers at any stage of the appraisal process i.e., 'In Planning', 'In Review' and 'In Process' states. However, as per help, i read that feedback from Part Appraisers can only be obtained when the appraisal form in state 'In Process'. This is one of our key requirement. How can we achieve this?
    Appreciate your inputs on this.
    Thanks
    Karthik

    HI Anupama,
    Please ensure that you are accessing the part appraiser document, only for the Part Appraiser document the Part Appraiser ID  adn roles are shown.
    Be dafault Phap_admin_pa only shows the main appraisal document. In order to view the part appraisal documnet, add the part appraisers in the selection screen besides the part appraisrs and then execute, the output will give u all part documents and appraisal document type should be "part document".
    Thanks & Regards,
    Swati

  • Part Appraiser Column in R/3 - not visible

    Hello,
    I'm facing trouble in getting the Part Appraiser column in OSA document within R/3. I've configured Appr. template with FAPP column with access to change for the Part Appraiser. Also the elements - Objectives are given individual access to the Part Apprsr.
    I'm suspecting if there is an authorization issue here. I'm using SAP_ALL access for testing purposes and still cant view the details in the Appraisal Document.
    Can you give me some direction on this please.
    I thank you.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    Ok, this is the scenario.
    Part appraiser is the manager itself. It's basically been setup to achieve the mid year review. So its the same manager doing the Mid/Yearly review.
    Now, when Mgr logs in, he is able to maintain the weightages and Final Appraisal columns. Mgr login is not able to see Part appraiser columns in editable.
    We are on ECC6.
    Thanks Sameer for looking into this.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Appraisal Document - Column Access

    Hello
    I have configured an Appraisal Template. I have an appraisee/part appraiser/appraiser in the workflow.
    The appraisee is able to fill in the weightage/target at the Goal Setting Stage. However, at the mid term appraisee/appraisers are unable to enter the target achieved. I checked the column access BADI and have not done any implementation for the same.The column access at the template level has been set so that AFTER planning stage, appraisee and appraiser are able to change the values at review/part appraisal and final appraisal state.
    But when the employee opens the document at midterm, his is unable to enter his targets achieved. What can be missing.
    Regards,
    Shubham

    Hi,
    As far as i can understand,
    1. check whether the column owner for the column "Target Achieved" is Appraisee/Employee.
    2. Check whether the employee/Appraiser/part appraiser has authorization to edit at template level by checking at the Review owner/review others stage.
    If this does not work out, you can very well create a badi implemantation for the column access.You can write your rules here. Get the help from an ABAPer if required.
    Also create a new filetr value for your Badi in OOHAP_BASIC.
    And dont forget to add the Badi implementation to the template.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Subbu

  • OSA - Part Appraisal Column Contents not saved

    Hi All:
    We are implementing OSA in ERP 2005.  We have implemented the header access BADI, that lets the employee change the part appraiser during the appraisal process. But when the part appraiser is changed, all the comments entered in the notes by the previous part appraiser is deleted.
    We would like to retain the notes entered by the previous part appraisers ( just like how it works fine for "Appraisers").
    Can we add additional code in the header access BADI to save the notes column and not delete and add a new one.
    Or is there an OSS note.  I looked in the market place could not find one.
    Thanks
    Iliana

    Hello Iliana,
    This is not possible. The reason for it is following. An appraiser is assigned to a document, a part appraiser is assigned to a part appraisal column with an unique part appraisal ID.
    If you replace the part appraiser we perform 2 actions, delete the old part appraiser. Here his notes are deleted. And create a new part appraisal column with a new ID for the new part appraiser.
    We would not have a possibility to display the old notes on the document even if we did not delete them.
    Regards and Groetjes,
    Maurice

  • Appraisal document not trigerring to the part appraiser ID

    Hi All,
    In PMS,the appraisal document is not triggering to the part appraiser's ID.It is triggering to the direct manager (appraiser ID),but the document is not visible to the part appraiser.Can anybody throw some light on the issue.Help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Deepti R

    Resolved.

  • Performance Appraisal-Move the document from Part Appraiser to Appraiser

    Hello
    After the 2nd level manager (part appraiser) has rejected the document, it should be sent back to the 1st level manager review the notes and make changes before resending it back to the 2nd level manager.
    When the second level manager receives the document, it is in "IN PROCESS-PART APPRAISAL IN PROCESS" status. Is it possible to change the status of the document from this status to "IN REVIEW" or some other status for the first level manager to make changes based on the 2nd level manager's feedback.
    How else can we incorporate the functionality? Please advice.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hello
    We were able to achieve this by adding multiple substatus to the status "In Process" and then control the authorization at that level.
    Thanks

  • Performance management for appraisal document Targets defaulting...

    Hi,
       My question is about custom badi implementation in Performance management for appraisal document Targets defaulting...
    Brief:
    ====
    At the creation of the personal appraisal, the column containing the performance targets of the employee is pre filled with the targets defined in the previous appraisal cycle and contained in the previous year employee appraisal form or in the target settings document.
    Solution:
          1   Please give me the soultion which badi i can use?
             and How to achieve to do this thru coding step by step?
          2. And Can you please share any other synario defaulting   developed previously.If u share these documents or coding .. It should be fine...
    Help me to do fastly ..
    waiting for asap response..
    Thanks and Regards
    Mohan.P

    Hi Chris,
    This component must be deployed in Portal because have a lot of services which need ESS in order to work properly. According with note 1408243 you must add those business components in your iView and only are available in that component. Once you deploy this component you do not need to assign any special role to users. The business object component is in Content Administration --> Portal Content --> Business Object --> ERP Common Parts --> Human Resources --> Employee.
    Follow this link:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/HOWTOGETRIDOFSPSTACKMISMATCHISSUES
    And get rid of mismatch issues!!!!
    Regards.
    David Cortés
    Edited by: David Cortes on Apr 22, 2010 11:53 PM

  • Max number of part appraiser allowed for a 360d appraisal

    Hi, experts,
    i am trying to implement a 360 degree appraisal using OSA framework(part appraisal).
    according to F1 help:
    If you have selected only the Part Appraiser (PAPP) and/or Importance
    Part Appraisal (PWGT) columns in an appraisal template, this is a 360°
    appraisal, and the SAP system does not restrict the number of part
    appraisers allowed.
    in my template, only have PAPP column , but the maximun number of part appraisers allowed is still set to 18. what's wrong? it should be no limit.
    i tried to create a document(using phap_create_pa) , the 18 limitation stop me to add more part appraiser.
    i am so confused, does that mean we can not have a REAL 360 appraisal without limitation for part appraiser?
    thanks and best regards.
    Jun

    hi,
    i traced into the program,  in funciton module
    HRHAP_0DOC_MAX_NO_PART_APPER
    it's quite clear, there is no special logic for 360 appraisal , the formula is always set to :
        no_of_part_appraisers = ( c_column_max_number - l_total_columns )
                                DIV l_part_columns.
    so i think it's not possible to use OSA to depict an REAL 360 appraisal without maximum appraiser limitation.
    the maxi number is (18 -1) / 1 = 17
    which is really a pitty...
    br.
    zj

  • Issues with part appraiser

    Hi,
    I am using part appraisers during " In Planning " and "in Process" status.  The process is working absolutely fine when the document is in "in process". However, when the document is in planning status it does not come into part appraiser's queue. I am unable to see the appraisal document under both ESS or MSS.
    I have maintained the owner of the substatus as Part appraiser and using PAPP column for part appraisal. When the status is in process and substatus Part appraiser in process the document is available under ESS.
    I have the following questions :
    1. Why is the document not avaiable for part appraiser when it is in planning?
    2. When document is in Process the part appraiser can view the document in ESS. Why not in MSS?
    3. there is a button called setstatus in process status. But this button is not available during In planning or any other sub status. Whats the significance of this ?
    Looking forward for your answers.
    Regards,
    Priya

    Hi F S,
    I am facing the same issue, Could you please let me know how you resolved it. Thanks!!!
    Raj

  • Appraisee should get access after Part Appraisal in "HAP_DOCUMENT"  BSP Application

    Dear All,
    Your valuable Inputs are strongly needed ....
    Requirement: After Part Appraisal completion,  Appraisee should access the document by his own ID to give the comments.
    Client is using "HAP_DOCUMENT"   BSP application on ESS.
    Document movement is successful till Part Appraisal, but after this Appraisee is Not getting the BSP document to give his comments.
    We are using following settings in PHAP_CATALOG_PA:
    For Part Appraisal:  Status 'In Process'  and  Sub-Status 'Part Appraisal'  -  Standard
    After Part Appraisal for  Appraisee:  Status 'In Process'  and  Sub-Status 'Overall Appraisal'  -  Standard
    Button Used for Appraisee:  "Send to Final Approval".
    We also have applied BADI  HRHAP00_BUT_ACCESS, HRHAP00_COL_access  for corresponding Status and Sub-Statuses.
    In PHAP_CATALOG_PA also we have done all the settings for Appraisee and Relevant columns, but still the same problem.
    If it is Not possible, then Suggest any other way  so that Appraisee can access the BSP document and give his comments after "Part Appraisal".
    It is really very Urgent, Kindly suggest how to achieve this ???
    Very Thanks,
    Edwin

    Dear All,
    Pls. help, its really urgent.
    Thanks

  • Part Appraisal - can not show 'note' box

    Good evening experts,
    That may be a very simple question but i didn't manage to figure out why i couldn't find the solution.
    I'm developing an appraisal template with part-appraisal and final-appraisal. Some criteria group and/or criteria need a 'note' box (eventually with draft) for both part appraisers and final appraisers. The note text box appears fine for the final appraiser but it doesn't for the part appraisers, whatever the config i do on the column access, element access, etc....seems pretty simple though :o(
    Anyone who has done this ? We're running ECC 6.00 with Enhancement Package 2005.1.
    Thanks in advance !
    Sylvain.

    Hi Sylvain ,
    This is not to answer your query but another question.
    I am too trying to implement Part Appraisers in Appraisal Process but not getting it done.
    When Part Appraiser try to change document from his user id the Document doesn't open up in change mode and also the relevant push Button is mising .
    Can you tell me when are the Part Appraisers added and if I am missing some basic thing for this.
    It will be of great help .
    Thanks
    Sudarshan

  • The note field is in non-editable mode in appraisal document

    Hi all,
    In appraisal document,
    the reviewer can give his comment in the status u201CIn Processu201D and in the Sub Status u201CAnnual Review by Addl Managers/Reviewersu201D in an appraisal document. It is editable when I am trying via web but when I try to upload the comment from backend GUI  ( using phap_admin) the note field is in non-editable mode. My client requires it in editable mode at the back end.
    Can any one help me on thisu2026

    Hello Girish,
    Can you please check the appraisal  template, Proper access has been given to use the note column. If still faces problem can look for the BADI  HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS.
    You can look for the following notes also :
    1554467   column access does not work
    Best Regards,
    Deepak..

Maybe you are looking for

  • Opening desktop app from internet application

    Hello, I have build an desktop application using swing package. It should be called by an internet application(jsp page). I am placing the desktop appliation(jar file) in a client machine. If the application is not in client machine then it should te

  • Laptop freezing when screen saver

    Hi and thanks in advance for your time. My laptop is freezing soon after the screen saver starts. In short, the sxreen saver continues but the mouse doesn't respond. I have no option but to force it to turn off using the turn on/off bottom. I ran tec

  • Cisco ACE key.pem import error

    Hi after extracting the Cert.pem and Key.pem from the PXF file. i am get the following error trying to import the Key.pem file to the ACE ENG-CTN-ACE01/Admin# crypto import tftp 10.3.31.249 key5.pem key5 Trying to connect to tftp server...... TFTP ge

  • I have an ipod touch 4th gen. Can anybody help with ghost files?

    Here is my problem:  I added an equalizer program called "Louder Logic", It worked great until I needed to delete most of my Loaded CD's, to create space.  I made the mistake of deleting the Louder Logic CD file first,  which created these Ghost  Fil

  • Background Image Support?

    i recently purchased a Creative Vision M (i also have a 30gb ipod video) and it allows you to select an image as your background while music is playing. i actually thought it would effect the battery life, but it really didnt. any chance apple can sh