Partial Confirmations

Hi Guru's,
I am trying to post a partial confirmation for a prod. order using CO11.
I created the production order for 20,000 EA. I am trying to post a part. confirmation for 2000 ea. If I click on actual data button it for some reason the system gives me 6,000,000 EA in the " Yeild to Conf. " filed. So the system replaces my 2000 EA with this 6,000,000 EA.
Please can someone tell me why this happening? Are we missing some customizing some where for partial conformations?
Please advise.
Best Regards,
Yasmeen

Dear Yasmeen
please run t-code OPK4 for your plant/order type,
goto tab "Indiv.Entry of Operation w.Init.Screen" and have a look at Screen Control Time Ticket section :
you can make your selection between the Quantities and Actual data
good luck

Similar Messages

  • Report for mass interruption of partially confirmed orders in PPDS?

    Hi gurus,
    our client has a lot of partially confirmed orders in the past, and this is giving us problems with the optimizer.
    Is there a report for mass interruption of this orders?
    We can do it one by one in the DS planning board, but there are too many!
    would appreciate any help,
    Pablo

    Hi Pablo,
    I would suggest you can close the partially confirmed orders at R/3 itself
    so that it will update in APO via CIF.
    There is delivery complete indicator in R/3 production/process order which
    upon checking will close the order.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Partial confirm on customeru2019s order quantity for EDI sales order

    Hi All,
      Our company is using ECC 6.0. We seem to having issues with orders coming through EDI u2013 i.e. it will not partially confirm what we have in stocks and just reject the whole line. E.g. If the customer is ordering 300 units for an material and we have 200 units in stocks only, it will zero confirm instead of partially confirm 200 units. If I try to manually key in the same material in the same sales order then it will partially confirm it (I.e. 200 units) instead of zero confirm.
      I have checked the ATP check rules and it seems everything alright. Any idea why this would happen only for EDI orders? Are there any EDI setup that will cause this issue? Any ideas where I can looks for the potential issues might be?
      Thank you.

    Evidence,
    What happens when you enter the order manually (VA01)?
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Purchase to Order Scenario - Partial Confirmation Issue

    Hello Team,
    We are using Item Category with Purchase to Order Scenario. When the Sales Order is booked, Purchase Requisition is Created. Sales Order Line is linked to the Purchase Requision/Purchase Order.
    In this scenario, we are getting confirmation on Sales Order through PR/PO Initially.
    Order Quantity     Confirmed Quantity
    10                         10
    Once we receive partial confirmation on PO let us say 7 system only confirms partially Sales Order.
    Order Quantity     Confirmed Quantity
    10                         7
    Issue happens when our team does partial delivery to customer before receiving full confirmation from the Supplier. System blocks further update of confirmation on the line and it becomes impossible to make delivery to Customer for Partial Quantity.
    I can think of two options...
    1. Somehow when we receive Partial Cofnirmation, our Availibility Check should confirm 7 on Confirmation recieved from the Supplier and 3 from Delivery Date of Purchase Order. So this issue won't happen.
    2. System should somehow allow Partial Confirmation even after Partial Delivery is done to the Customer.
    Do let me know if you need any more details from my side.
    Kaushal

    Hi Kaushal,
    i assume that you have special stock indicator in your sales order.
    if you do not use confiramtion then all quantities are confirmed at schedule line level.
    if you use confirmation e.x. 7 of 10 pieces then you will have confirmer 7 quantities in your schedule line.
    if you create another confirmation in PO of 2 pieces and lets say different date you will see another schedule line in your sales order.
    do your system works like this?
    Is your third party scenario require a googds receipt for PO to move on to delivery?
    Regards.

  • Operation time calculation based on partial confirmation.

    Dear FRndz,
    Pls help me out with following scenario.
    1.Am defining a task list in which am mentioning the set up time as 30 min & operation time as 10 Min per peice of finished goods.
    2.Creating a production order for 10 Pieces.
    3.Am doing partial confirmation of 5 Nos.
    At this point of time I want the system to calculate the timings appropriately for 5 peices.how do I configure it?....
    REgards,
    Srini

    Dear,
    Go to TCODE :OPK0
    This is the single screen entry for confirmation.
    Select the profile you are using & in the tab Defaults
    go to section default values & select "IMMEDIATE PROPOSAL"
    in both "quantities & services"
    It will definitely work.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • CM01 not updating upon partial confirmation of an activity in order

    Hello PP Angels,
    I am looking for an explanation for this.
    When a production order is partially confirmed, (using CO11N),
    for an activity -- say labor time.
    (and do not confirm any quantity )
    subsequently, on checking the CM01 Standard Overview,
    I find the report unchanged, under the requirements column.
    (for the week concerned)
    But the same ( capacity requirements) gets reduced,
    for the relevant week,
    on doing a partial confirmation of production order,
    for a value in the "Yield" field in C011N.
    Is this the standard SAP behavior ?
    I am in ECC6.
    Thanks in advance !

    Thanks for the reply !
    I have tried it
    It does work,
    there is a change in the cap reqmnt column in CM01
    But the value is not as expected, as explained below.
    CM01 shows initial cap req as 33.5H
    After confirming the production order
    for 10 minutes (0.1667 H) of set up time
    I would expect the Cap Req Column to have a value of 33.5 H - 0.1667 H  = 33.3 H
    but CM01 displays only 0.17 H
    ( I have created this scenario such that CM01 reflects only one production order.
    So there is no mix up of data. )
    Can we see how the Cap Req column in CM01 is being calculated, (the details)
    I did double click the cap Req  value in CM01
    and it shows the relevant production order,
    but no further details can be viewed pertaining to the calculations.
    Thanks in advance !!!

  • PO Partial confirmation Quantity not updated for non-catalog items in SRM

    Hi Experts,
    Partial Confirmation plus Partial Rejection from Ariba(Suppliers network) could not be processed.
    Steps to Reproduce:
    1) Create a purchase order.
    2) Confirm some part of the quauntity and reject the balance part in Ariba.
    3) Open the link in SRM and click Copy push button.
    4) Click on Process PO and check PO, the PO is not updated with the changes done in Ariba
    Expected Result:
    PO should update the changes done in Ariba.
    Here when part quantity is confirmed and part is rejected at Ariba, its sending a POR but SRM is not updating anything for non-catalog items when POR is copied onto PO.But where as  in the Catalog items partially confirmed POR is copied onto PO.
    kindly give your valuable inputs to poceed furthur.
    Regards,
    Chandu

    Hi,
    I'm not clear you issue. Is it SC -> PR(backend) -> PO(backend) classic scenario ? or You just created a PO in backend system?
    BBP_GET_STATUS_2 will update SC follow-on doc information from backend.
    Regards,
    Masa

  • Partials Confirmations - QTY's not getting picked automatically

    We are facing issues, where we are doing confirmations partially. Intial confirmations
    are done for a set of quantities followed by confirmations for remaining quantities for that
    production order. The problem is system is not picking the remaining quanities automatically
    We are plugging in remaining quantities manually before doing confirmations
    Is there a configuration setting, where we can popluate the remaining quantities automatically
    Transaction Used: CO11n
    Client: ECC 6.0
    AFS Implementation

    Thanks for your replies
    The given setting was already maintained, but still system was not populating the remaining qty's
    more appropriate way is to, change the quantities in the intial front screen of  CO11n, rather than
    changing the quantities inside CO11n (click through goods movement tab)
    By changing the Qty's in the intial screen of CO11n, helps in populating the remaining  quantities
    during next partial confirmations
    Due points have been assigned

  • Production Order Partial Confirmation Report

    My requirement is to write a report to get all the partial confirmation time, date and Qty of a Production Order. Which table stores the relevant information? Kindly help me.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check with  AFRD,AFRU, AFRV  RESB, AFKO,& AFPO tables.
    Regards,
    Maha

  • Can we restrict the partially confirmed production order from getting delet

    Dear all,
    Can we restrict the partially confirmed production order from getting deleted?
    I.e. if the production order is having status PCNF then the deletion flag indicator (status DLFL) should not be allowed to set
    SmanS
    Edited by: SAP PP Consultant on Feb 4, 2009 6:12 AM

    Hi,
    Then must be there is change in BS22.Check allowed transaction setting for Status PCNF/CNF .For reference purpose compare it with other client IDES or sand box.
    For your reference I have pasted Error log on the same.
    Balance of ORD 1000000702 is not zero
    Message no. KO115
    Diagnosis
    The balance on object ORD 1000000702 is not zero. That is, there are still costs on the object.
    System Response
    The object cannot be closed and the deletion flag must not be set.
    regards,
    Dhaval

  • BAPI for Partial Confirmation CO11N

    Dear Gurus,
    REG : BAPI
    How to get the actual activites for partial confirmation of qty
    we have tried some bapis like for getting activites we have used
    bapi_prodordconf_get_tt_prop
    but in this bapi it is calculating total qty i.e, order qty not for the yeild qty.
    I need to get the yeild qty planned activites
    Tks
    Murali

    Hi,
    Check the Bapis
    BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT 
    BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR
    Regards,
    Raj.

  • Process Order Partial confirmation (PNCF) and Final Confirmation

    Hi expert,
    I'm already running t-code COHVPI to mass processing process order so it status change from TECO to CLOSED. But there is an error message "process order partially confirmed". Is that true if process order must be final confirmed before it changed to CLOSED. Should we change the status of partial confirmed (PNCF) to Final confirmed (CNF) before process order CLOSED.
    Please give me a suggestion.
    Thank you.

    Correct. Final Confirmation is THE signal to the rest of the world that that this order is DONE (at least from the GR standpoint). This will also retire the order from the APO/SNP radar.

  • Partial confirmation of production order

    Hi,
    My requirement is that when i partially confirm production order system should calculate the activity time(machine time) propotionately based on actual confirmed qty.
    What is actually happening is that system is proposing the machine time based on full operation qty.
    I will explain the case with following example:
    Total Order qty - 20
    Now when i do CO11N the system proposes full operation qty of 20 & also the machine time 20 hrs(based on data given in routing)
    Now i when do partial confirmation of 5 units the machine time proposed is still 20hrs.
    This is impacting my costing report( as it should consider 5 hrs instead of 20 hrs)
    One more thing i want to clarify is that during confirmation we can change the machine time but requirement is that machine time should be in proportion to the confirmed qty(This is to reduce the confirmation effort)
    I hope things are clear to you.
    regards,
    Mohit Goyal

    Hi Goyal
    I suppose you are in SAP version 4.6c & above.
    you try in TCODE :OPK0
    This is the single screen entry for confirmation.
    Select the profile you are using & in the tab Defaults
    go to section default values & select "IMMEDIATE PROPOSAL"
    in both "quantities & services"
    It will definitely work.
    YMREDDY

  • Workforce Planning for Partially Confirmed Activities

    Hi All,
    I have recently configured Workforce planning for one of the clients, and it has been working as per the requirement. Here, I have configured Workforce Planning profile and Scheduling parameters of Network. So, once a Project and a Network is created, User plans Personnel for this Network's activity using CMP2. Also, CATS profile is maintained in such a way that Worklist shows the Planned hours and accordingly a person can book Time against it.
    Now, the problem arises after a Personnel assigned to an activity books the Timesheet. Once a Person books time against this particular Activity, it gets disappeared from CMP2 screen. Now, practical implications are that, suppose that person goes for a leave or leaves the organization and PM wants to assign another person for the same Activity (which is partially confirmed).
    How can we address this issue - to perform workforce planning for Partially Confirmed activities?
    Any pointers to User Exits, BADIs, BAPIs or SAP Notes are highly appreciated.

    Hi Sanjeev,
    Thanks for your feedback.
    In CMP2, we are already checking the activity work hours. According to that only we are adding resource, then checking that resource's availability and then assigning work.
    As an example, activity work duration is from 20.08.2014 to 30.09.2014. I assigned a resource A from 20.08.2014 to 30.09.2014 for 8 hours because he is available in that duration.
    Now, the real problem comes when this resource is suddenly unavailable (due to any reason) and PM comes to know about this on 07.09.2014. Resource A has already booked Timesheet for the duration he has worked (20.08 to 06.09). So activity is PCNF.
    So PM wants to reduce the Work assignment for Resource A from 30.09.2014 to 06.09.2014 and assign Resource B from 07.09.2014 to 30.09.2014, but he is unable to get this activity in CMP2 view because it is PCNF. Here PM can only see activities of same project which are in REL status.
    So how can I enable this PCNF activity in CMP2 view.
    If there is any IMG activity settings, then let me know.
    If this is standard behavior and can be done through User Exit/BADI/BAPI then also let me know.
    Message was edited by: Aditya Kotak

  • Restriction of posting date in transaction CO11N for partial confirmations

    Hi all,
          I am trying to restrict(by checking thru an exit)  the posting date in co11n , for this i m using enhancement CONFPP04.
         Import parameter AFRUD_IMP IS USED.
         Now when i m putting  production order no , operation activity no.(for e.g 10 , 20 etc ) and posting date IN SEL SCREEN OF CO11N
        AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT( POSTING DATE )  CONTAINS VALUE  in debugging mode , hence i m getting the value of posting date
        and in that case check is written in code.  This is the case of full confirmation.
                                     But in case of partial confirmation  i have to give   production order no , operation activity no , *Partial confirmed qty * and posting date , in this case the posting date value changes to 0 in the debug mode ie.
      AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT is showing 0 and hence no calculation can be done base on the date.
          Our requirement is such that if there is a prd order no say X,
    then in CO11N if user enters prd no X  , operation activity no 10 , post date say D1
    then again for  prd no X  , operation activity no 20 , post date  of activity 20 should not be less than D1
    SIMAILARY for  X,  ACTIVITY 30 ,  post date should not less than that of  activity  20. and so on.
        But if partial quantity is mentioned value of  AFRUD_IMP-BUDAT is becoming null.
          If anyone knows about this scenario please share.
      Thanks and regards
    Pankaj Gupta

    Hi, In the T-code Mb31 
    The Posting Date which is used  is when entering the document in Financial Accounting or Controlling. The fiscal year and the period for which an update of the accounts specified in the document or cost elements is made, are derived from this posting date.
    When entering documents, the system checks whether the posting date entered is allowed by means of the posting period permitted.But this posting date can differ from both the entry date (day of entry into the system) and the document date (day of creation of the original document).This is for the practical purpose .
    So its for the Monthly permitted and not for a day or range .
    Secondly when you are saying :
    "We want this <b>default date to get freeze</b> the moment you enter
    the transaction (MB31). If you are opting for second option we want
    <u><i><b>some flexibility to change the date as required</b></i></u>."
    Both freezing and opting for changes is not possible , either one can occur .
    You can freeze/display mode only  the field for the T-code and the document type, but that will not solve your problem .
    What i understand from the description is you want to Do GR on A particular date or GR should be allowed after a particular date . <u><b>Please let me know</b></u> if this is the case then there's a way around to do this that is you can do GR and Post on the dates near to your desirable dates .
    cheers KP

  • Capacity Plan for Partially Confirmed Order

    Hi Guys
    Can any one please guide me on Capacity Planning (CM29) how to:
    1. Plan to plan a partial order. Or in other terms: how to plan a part order in wk1 and rest in wk2
    2. If the process order is partially confirmed, then how should supervisor re-schedule it again for later date!
    3. Ideally what should be followed:
      a. Schedule the Planned Order on CM29 and then Convert them to Process Order , OR
      b. Convert the Planned Order and then Schedule the Process Order on the CM29 screen
    Thanks in advance
    -Rahul

    Hi Mehdi,
    Once order status is PCNF you cannot create lot with inspection type as 03. You need to reverse all the confirmations/Goods issue and activate 03 inspection type in material master, maintain MIC related data in routing and do Read Master data. Then system will create inspection lot.
    For 03 inspection type manually inspection lot cannot be created. Once order is released inspection lot will be automatically created by system.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramagiri

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reporting Services as a generic service in a failover cluster group?

    There is some confusion on whether or not Microsoft will support a Reporting Services deployment on a failover cluster using scale-out, and adding the Reporting Services service as a generic service in a cluster group to achieve active-passive high a

  • How to Extend S-Video Cable to Watch DVDs on TV?

    My TV's built-in DVD player died, so I want to use my iMac as a DVD player but watch DVDs on the TV. The video cable (S-video?) as you know is about 6 inches long. The TV is approx. 15 feet from the iMac. Is there some sort of a cable extender to att

  • Handling SOAP DIME attachments with Flex

    Hi, Is possible to get SOAP DIME attachments with Flex? I'm trying to get thumbnails of pages returned in jpeg by a WebService request that has that thumbnail as DIME attachment on its response, but don't know how to handle it with Flex. Thanks Aleix

  • Creating Blue-ray disc - H.264 Codec?

    Hi, I know I can use MPEG-2 for Blue-Ray. Is it possible to use H.264 Codec for Blue-Ray in Compressor? (it should be much more efficient then the MPEG)... How can I make it work?

  • Problems opening ePub.zip files in iBooks?

    I write book reviews and recently the publisher I work for has stopped sending press copies and only sends eBook copies in the form of ePub.zip files. They claim the files will work on Nook e-readers and "most other available e-readers". The problem