Partial Payment (with invoice reference) for Invoice-based items

Hi Gurus,
I'd like to make partial payments to credit memos while "Include partial payment" is activated. However, if i activate "Include partial payment, partial payments for invoice-based items are no longer possible (partial payment amount is displayed only, and full amount is automatically applied).
My credit memos were posted via BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST. I've read that when using BAPI, invoice reference field is automatically populated with "V".
Can you please enlighten me what is SAP's logic behind this. How does SAP determine invoice-based items? And is there a workaround so I could still make partial payment while it is activated? Thank you.
Regards,

Hai Dianne,
Check it once OBA4 & OBA4 t.codes both are Tolerance Group
Regards
Madhu I

Similar Messages

MIRO-Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item-F5350

Hi gurus
please help
When I tried to cancel an MIRO invoice, it is giving me the error
Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item". "F5350 "
Please advise.
thanks
MSJ

Hello,
This seems to be a configuration issue or you might be entering the wrong details.
This is a standard transaction. IF you feel there is nothing wrong, then search for OSS notes on http://service.sap.com to see if there is a solution to this problem.
cheers,
sushil joshi

Invoice Reference Number in Line item of Credit Memo

Hi Experts
I tried getting a specific and relevant answer to why we enter "V" in invoice reference field of a Credit Memo?
On going through the SAP Help text - A special rule applies to credit memos which have a "V" in this field. The due date is determined in the same way as for an invoice. If the field is empty (containing neither a document number nor a "V") the due date is the baseline date for payment.
I understand this relates the credit memo to an invoice but how SAP determines the invoice from which it will pull the payment terms for this credit memo?
Is this V concept applicable only in case of MIRO Invoices or otherwise too?
Thanks in advance.
Arjun

Arjun,
We have 3 ways of credit memo use for REBZG field:
1 - REBZG = Invoice -> You credit document will fetch payment term, payment method and due date from invoice.
2 - REBZG = "V" -> The credit document works as individual invoice. The due date is calculated by Bseline date + Payment terms.
3 - REBZG = " " -> The credit memo is opened to be used in any other invoice as discount. Baseline date is the due date as default.
Your questions:
* There are no reference for invoices in cases number 2 and 3.
* This is apliccable for invoices from all transactions.
Best Regards

How to calculate with holding tax for the open item

Dera all,
Can you tel me how to simulate with holding tax for the open item? i will try do it using FI_WT_F110_CALCULATE FM but it dosnt work. plz help me
regard
nawa

Hi Sushil,
can you please elaborate on how you resolved it. we are facing the same issue with BAPI not calculating the withholding tax data.
Thanks,
Sanket

Invoice reference for residual payment

HI experts
I observed if I receive the payment from customer Rs 10000 for the invoice Rs15000 through residual payment then system creates new line item for Rs 5000 and this will be shown as open item and all others will be clered items.
Here my issue is for new line item system is not storing the original invoice details in invoice reference field. How to maintain source invoice details to residual new line item.
Pls advice me
Thanks in advance
Sneha

Hi,
Anil is correct. All the details you entered in your incoming payment document when you posting your residual payment, will be displayed in the new line item created after that. My practice last time is that I will maintain the original invoice number at Reference field as suggested by Anil and entered my PO or SO number at Document header text.
If you don't wish to lose all the original details, you can use partial payment tab instead of residual. Partial payment will post the incoming payment without clearing any item. Then you can clear it off all together when you are posting for the last incoming payment for that particular invoice.
Hope this help.

Final invoice indicator for Service based IV

Hello,
For invoice verification based on Service entry, the system proposes the final invoice indicator checked. I'm trying to uncheck this indicator as in our case, vendors usually sends partial invoices.
We have FM implemented and applied Link: [note 583400 MIRO: EREKZ always proposed with services|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lcyZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=583400] and it solved part of our issue, as leaving the commitment in the PO, but we need to find a way to unmark the indicator on MIRO so the GR - IV account is not cleared after a partial invoice.
I would appreciate if someone can tell me how to approach this scenario.
Thanks in advance,

Hello Bharat,
The indicator of the PO is set after this indicator on the invoice. It is actually a result of the IV unless you apply the note 583400.
What I need is that this indicator to be unchecked for Service items with service entry.
Regards,

Unlimited MIRO invoice allowed for GR based IV item

Hi,
I have a problem where the user keeps posting invoices against incorrect Service ENtry Sheets(SES). The user wants to know if there is a message which can be given at this point.
PO item is a service
The flag for GR based IV is set.
The following processing has been done.
PO qty: 45600
1) SES1 - Amount 11400
2) GR1 against SES1
Dr      expense            11,400
Cr      GR/IR Clearing     -11,400
3) IR1 - Amount 4,998.15 against SES1
Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
Dr     GR/IR Clearing     11,400
Cr     Expense          -6,401.85
At this point, the GR/IR clearing account has been cleared and the expense account entries have also been nullified.
So the effective posting in FI will be as follows:
Cr      Vendor          -4,998.15
Dr      expense            (11,400-6401.85) = 4998.15
At this point, if I try to create an invoice using MIRO wrt the same PO item, it still allows me to post an invoice of 6401.85 as the difference between the GR amount and the IR amount still exists.
The invoice is not even set for blocking.
However, FI wise, there is no pending invoice for this item.
The users do not want this scenario to be allowed. Can anyone suggest how this can be prevented.
If I do post this invoice at this stage, it creates the following FI entries.
Cr     Vendor          - 6401.85
Dr     Expense            6401.85
After this, any further invoices on this PO item are blocked for payment.
Please help as this scenario keeps on occuring for service items and becomes a mess for items having multiple SES.
Let me know if further inputs are required.
Thanks!
PM

Hello Sudhir,
Thanks for your response. However, in this case, the quantity has not been exceeded.
If you notice, the IRd amount(4998.15) is still less than the GRd amount(11400) in the PO history.
However, the postings have been cleraed at the FI document level.
The checks that you have mentioned get hit only after the IR amount crosses the GR amount of 11400 and then th einvoice goes into payment block. Which is correct.
Please let me know if you have further suggestions or if I have understood your response incorrectly.
Thanks!
PM

Credit Memo Invoice Reference for EDI (Inbound)

Hello,
When posting Credit Memos with EDI, SAP is not checking the invoice reference in IDOC segment E1EDK02 QUALF 009 to match the credit memo for vendor invoice that is already posted in the system.
Is there a note or config that needs to be done to invoke the reference number checking for Credit Memos?
We are on ECC 5.0 using INVOIC02.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You.

Hi PP,
thankyou. My Credit memo request has the previous date. Date of Confirmation and service rendered.
When billing, i am not able to change settings.. as the fields were greyed out.
I am not too familiar with CRM billing .. but in ECC .. we use the Date Service Rendered. this date would take the correct VAT effective date.
When i go to the item overview, all the fields have been greyed out. and i am not able to change any fields. is there somewhere in the settings that i could make the Pricing date and Date Serv. Rendered editable in the credit memo
thank you
F Bushfield

Problem in invoice printout for second line item of the contract.

Hi,
There are two line items in the contract. Both with different material and different plants. 1st line item with plant japan, and 2nd line item with plant singapore. But, when i try to take printout for 2nd line item after invoicing it, the address appearing in printout is of Japan instead of singapore.
Any idea why this happening?
Please revert back asap.

Hi Chetan,
If that is a header output, then there are issues at the design level itself. You have an output as header output and you expect the item level details to be printed in two different printouts.How is this handled in the program. Mostly header outputs are used to print the details abotu all the items in the doucment , not for a specific item. If you want to print a specific item only , then it is always advisable to configure the output as item output.
Leaving that aside, the problem lies in the code. You may be selecting the item number when you are printing the details of the second item, but for printing address, you are not coding using the item number.
To prove this test this scenario.
Create an order with first item belonging to Singapore plant and second item Japan plant.
Now create the otuput for item1----it will work fine
Do the same for item2-----Now, the plant address will be of Singapore, while the material belongs to Japan.
If this happens, it can be safely assumed that problem lies in the code. Do this test and then if the problem is in the program, discuss with your developer, he will rectify the bug for you.
You can reward me if this solves your problem.

How to Maintain Payment with one check for Multiple Vendors?

Dear Gurus,
i have a scenario for outgoing payment, here it is
i have some open items for multiple vendors. say it for open item
1. with amount 5000 USD for vendor A
2. wiht amount 10000 USD for vendor B
my company pay both open item 1 & 2 with one check, say the check no is 27382830 and the amount is 15000 USD. The check is given to the Bank as an order to Pay the vendor. so the check does not have receiver name. i attach a formal letter to the bank to ask them for making payment with that check. the letter contains a detail the amount, vendor bank account number, account holder, and the vendor name.
so how i can threat this business scenario into SAP? i want to trace check number used to pay the vendors.
hope you can give some clues. is it possible to maintain scenario above with automatic payment?
best regards,
land lord

Hi,
Yes you can map this scenario in SAP and use F110 for this. But you will also have to use some Z programs..
1. For F110 FBZP configuration, maintain outgoing bank clearing Account (this will be a dummy account and not the actual Outgoing Bank Account) as the Bank Sub Account.
By doing this when you run payment in F110, entry will be
Vendor A A/c...Dr.
outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(1)
Vendor B A/C... Dr.
outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(2)
2.Then you will have to use Post with clearing transaction codes and make one entry
outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(1)..Dr.
outgoing bank clearing Account Cr.(2)..Dr.
To Bank Outgoing Account(Actual Bank outgoing Account) Cr.
3. Now, when you get the single cheque no. from Bank against both the vendors, then thru FB02, change the assignment field/Reference field for Che No. updates.
But do check BRS also for its reconciliation.. If you do it on a daily basis.. then it would not be difficult.
Hope this helps you..
Regards,
SAPFICO

Partial payment tab problem when clearing two open items in vendor account

Dear All,
I have the problem with partial payment procedure.
As SAP is presenting the process, partial payment should work as follows (i.e. with vendor):
1. Incoming invoice is posted -> Credit -100
2. Credit note is posted -> Debit +20
3. Payment (without clearing) is posted to vendor account -> Debit +50
I'll run transaction F-44 and go to tab "Partial payment".
I see 3 items (as above).
I mark Item -100 and +20
I double click in filed next to -100 and it changes to -20
An now it should make no posting but only assignemet of one item to another.
But in my case, if I click "save" icon, it makes postings Debit 20 and Credit -20 on vendor account.
Is there any possibility that such clearing will not generate any posting but just make assignement of one item to another. Or maybe there is something wrongly configured in the system. At the moment the partial payment makes some kind of residual items.
Thanks in advance for replay.
Best regards
Greg

Hello,
Yes, it's right, whenever we clear vendor or custmoer account, the system creates document, but as I remeber from other instalations, the document had header but there was no postings.
It case described, the system creates posting:
40 Vendor 20 EUR
50 Vendor 20 EUR
This is strange for me. As ther should be clearing document but with no postings.
Have you got any idea how to configure the system, so partial payment tab in clearing transactions creates clearing document but with no phisical postings.
Best regards
Greg

How to create a .msg with a reference to a mail item with in the same mailbox.

Hi,
I want to achieve the following: I want to create a .msg message in a mailbox with some custom text and a reference to a mail item within the same mailbox but resides in a different folder.
Is there a way to create a reference to a individual mail item with the same mailbox?
In other words, I want to create a sort of symbolic link to a specific mail item.
Can this be done with C# and EWS?
Thanks, Darrell

You can create hyperlinks using the Outlook: URL format eg Outlook :< ENTRYID> in the body of a message that refers to another Item in a Mailbox see
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/pallavs/archive/2012/03/14/outlook-hyperlinks-for-public-folder-items-in-outlook-2010-does-not-work.aspx
Cheers
Glen

PO Partial confirmation Quantity not updated for non-catalog items in SRM

Hi Experts,
Partial Confirmation plus Partial Rejection from Ariba(Suppliers network) could not be processed.
Steps to Reproduce:
1) Create a purchase order.
2) Confirm some part of the quauntity and reject the balance part in Ariba.
3) Open the link in SRM and click Copy push button.
4) Click on Process PO and check PO, the PO is not updated with the changes done in Ariba
Expected Result:
PO should update the changes done in Ariba.
Here when part quantity is confirmed and part is rejected at Ariba, its sending a POR but SRM is not updating anything for non-catalog items when POR is copied onto PO.But where as in the Catalog items partially confirmed POR is copied onto PO.
kindly give your valuable inputs to poceed furthur.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi,
I'm not clear you issue. Is it SC -> PR(backend) -> PO(backend) classic scenario ? or You just created a PO in backend system?
BBP_GET_STATUS_2 will update SC follow-on doc information from backend.
Regards,
Masa

Problem with parameters and non table based items

Hi,
I have a situation where I have some not table based items on a page (shuttles and select lists). It is parameters that the end user inputs. I have another page with the same items just here they are Display Only and also not table based. When the user press a button I branch from page 1 to page 2 and set the items on page 2. My problem is that the input the user keys in are not copied to the items on page 2. I can see the data in the session state.
I assume that this is a silly question and I have just set Source Used or Source Type wrong one one of the items but I can not get it working. Can anybody help?
It works fine if I use a Application Item and creates a process on page 1 where I copy the item value from the session state but that should be needed right?
Regards Pete

Thanks Scott,
I think I got it working. If I remove all the colons from the data it works. I select several entries in a Shuttle and the result is a colon delimited string of values. If I remove these in a process it works fine. Is there a way of escaping the output from a Shuttle?
Regards Pete

F110 and Payment in Foriegn currency for Invoice Book in different currency

Hi,
I am facing problem in Automatic payment Program [F110] scenario as follows:
I have booked invoice in INR and now wants to make Payment in USD.
All related setting for FBZP i have done as follows:
Define Payment method and inserted USD as currency. In payment method i have allowed Foreign currency payments.
Alll related Band Determination setting i have done.
Still it is not allowing to make payment in USD. Payment line item process with Error giving message
NO VALID PAYMENT METHOD FOUND.
If i remove USD currency from Payment Method it Process without error.
Please suggest any way of processing INR BOOKED INVOICE PAYMENT IN USD with Automatic Payment Program F110.

Hi,
"have entered Run Date and Identification.
Given Company code, +Payment method with Currency as USD+ & Next run date vendor with Open Item in INR.
Than in Additional log i have selected three option.
Printout i have given variant for payment method and house bank."
My observation is, program is asking for payment method by which you wanna make payment to vendor in USD, but ur giving payment method it self as USD which is not correct, payment method can be like Check method, EFT method, ACH method, Direct Debit method, Wire transfer method extu2026..
Edited by: Giridhar Reddy on Jul 9, 2008 11:53 AM

Partial Payment (with invoice reference) for Invoice-based items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for