Particular Perner not getting picked during simulation/ Live Run - Payroll

Hi Experts
Payroll program is not picking up a particular perner during execution when executed by payroll admin of that country . We have checked the SU53 dump and found no errors . All authorizations are in place.The payroll admin had executed the payroll for this perner last month without any issue.No org / master data changes made in last 2 month. The perner is not getting picked up in simulation and live mode. Please advice
Regards
Sriram

Dear Sriram,
Check infotype 0003 for the particular employee.
Find Weather the employee is locked.If locked do the deselection and run the payroll.
Regards,
Sairam.

Similar Messages

Asset GL accounts not getting picked up in ABST2 run

Hi,
There are few asset GL accounts i.e APC and AccDep accounts which are not getting picked up in ABST2 run. What could be the reason? Please advise as to how can we ensure that we get a spool of all the GL accounts post ABST2 run.
Thanks,
DP

Are the missing GL accounts set up as asset reconciliation accounts go to FS03, enter GL account number, and go to control data tab, field recon account for account type should be A for Assets.
Thanks,
Tammy

EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination

HI .. all,
We have transferred Sales order from ECC to GTS. But during prreferrence determination, EXW price of the Sales order is not getting picked up.
Please suggest if any configuration is missing .
Thnks in Advance .

Hi Sapcongts,
Of course you should not modify standard SAP code, and I will not help you to do that.
I don't agree with your idea of proposed and actual EXW values. The Sales Order is your way of recording the customer's Purchase Order, and the price should be fixed at that point. The billing process should not change the agreed price of the goods - only perhaps re-calculate taxes and any other charges that could not be confirmed at the time of order.
If your standard prices are offered as FOB, then I can understand your needing to subtract some components to reach the EXW price, but in that case you will have problems transferring the correct amount to GTS. As I mentioned earlier, you can manipulate the data in the BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0A_R3, but I had not looked closely enough at this specific requirement. Unfortunately the pricing table KONV is not provided in the BAdI and that data will not yet be available in the database. Provided the elements to be subtracted are to be read from Master Data, then you could make that same subtraction again in the BAdI. But if there are complex dependencies, it might not be easy.
Having looked in more detail at the code, I think you would be reasonably entitled to complain to SAP about missing functionality here. In the ERP system, the SD pricing provides a specific sub-total (KOMP-PREVA: subtotal 8) for Preference Value, and you can easily configure that to be filled after your subtractions. But that subtotal is not used in the GTS mapping, and I think that's a mistake. You might want to create an OSS message about it, requesting that the GTS Preference value be taken from the sub-total that was clearly designed exactly for that purpose.
In any case, good luck with the project.
Regards,
Dave

Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

Dear Experts,
I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
Thanks and Regards
Mansih

Hi,
Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
Regards,
Biju K

Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
Sanjay

Hi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay

Files not getting picked from the FTP site

Dear All,
We are having one File-XI-RFC scenario running in XI-PRD Server. Sometimes what happens is that files available in the FTP site are not getting picked by the File adapter. I have checked in the adapter monitoring and communication channel is active there. Also, there are no errors regarding this in SXMB_MONI. I have configured alerts also but for this case no alerts are getting trigerred. And also when I am reactivating that particular communication channel then that file is getting picked instantaneously.
Can anybody please guide me on what might be the real cause for this as this error is happening randomly.
regards,
N.Jain.

HI,
Have you used per File transfer parameter in FTP Communication channel.
It makes the FTP adapter inactive in ideal time.
So add the poll interval may be for every 30 mins or something like it. It will forcefully activate the FTP port after every 30 mins. You may have the poll interval for every 1 min. Only the files to be picked up are getting logged in in XI monitoring.
So there will be no garbage collection of unwanted messages in Monitoring.
Thanks
Swarup

Billing pricing not getting picked up

I created a sales invoice with reference a sales order. In the sales order the price was getting picked up and was displayed.
Delivery was also created. But when the invoice was created and saved the net value is shown as 0. Price is not getting picked up.
The option which many other consultants has given was to cancel the invoice and re create a new invoice. But we want the price to be picked in the same invoice.
This happened only for 5 invoices which was created on a particular day. These 5 inovices show a net value of 0.
Could you please help me out to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.

Hi,
Please check if the document pricing procedure is same for Order type and billing type.
If its not same please check what is the pricing procedure system taking for Billing document procedure.
In that pricing procedure check what is the Base price condition type.
Check whether condition records maintained for that condition type.
Iff no records maintain then use VK11 to create new condition records.
Then go to Item data - Conditions in billing document press Update button and use B-Carry out new pricing.
Revert if you need more elaborate explanation.
Best Regards,

HT4623 my iphone 5 is not getting audio during calls, im not hearing anything unless i put it on speaker. Can you help me is this a software problem its very annoying for every call i dial or recieve i have to put on speaker. Please help me apple please.

my iphone 5 is not getting audio during calls, im not hearing anything unless i put it on speaker. Can you help me is this a software problem its very annoying for every call i dial or recieve i have to put on speaker. Please help me apple please.

There's a whole lot to read in your post, and frankly I have not read it all.
Having said that, this troubleshooting guide should help:
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1538
In particular, pay attention to the mobile device support sections near the bottom, assuming you have already done the items above it.

Batch Classification data not getting updated during the GR of the PO

Dear Gurus,
While doing the GR of the Purchase order the classification data for the batch should get updated .However we can see those data in MSC2N (Change batch) but not in MSC3N (Display Batch) .While consultuing with SAP we found that the data in MSC3N is directly picked in the AUSP table but the data in MSC2 N reads the information directly from the
reference table field (MCH1-LWEDT & MCH1-LIFNR .My Qusetion is why this the AUSP entries are not getting updated during the GR itself.
Sumit Mohan

Hi Sumit,
I am not sure about your question, but if you want to populate the classification data during goods receipt then you need to maintain characteristics values in material master for classification tab under class type batch i.e. 022. After then it will apper during goods receipt for characteristics value for batch.
Regards,
Bhagat

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run. I have maiantained source list for the material with proper validity date and also maintained scheduling agreement . MRP relevvant Indicator , I have marked - 2 which means -Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically.
Still I am not able to get schedule lines and instead of that *Purchase Requisitions* are getting generated.
Can any one help me and suggest me what to be done in this case .
Thanks & Regards ,
Nirmalya

Dear,
Welcome to SDN,
In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Excise Part-2 is not getting updated during the MIGO

Dear Experts,
When I am doing GR (MIGO), I am selecting the Excise posting transaction in "Excise" header tab as "Capture & Post Excise Invoice".
But, here after posting the GR, only Part-1 is getting updated. Part-2 is not updating. Moreover, if I try to post the same vendor excise invoice in J1IEX, it is giving the error as " Part-1 not yet posted even though Part-1 is updated. Can any body suggest what is the root cause for the same?
One more thing is, once I select "Only Capture Excise Invoice" during GR, in the normal process Part-1 is updating and I'll be able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. There is no issue. But, I can't be able to post the Part-2 during GR.
Note: I am receiving the goods against with the STO. And, we are paying the customs against with the STO. After paying the Customs Invoice, we are receiving the goods into our manufacturing Plant from logical plant.
Thanks in advance for your action!!!!
Regards,
Satya
Dear

Hi Ashok,
I went through the above note. It explains the causes that why the posting is not happening in J1IEX.
And, as per the solution that is in that note, if we change the status of that excise invoice from 'P' to Blank in the table J_1IEXCHDR, then Vendor excise invoice will be cancelling.
So, I guess this can't resolve my issue. Because, my issue is if I select "Only Capture Excise", the Part-1 is updating in MIGO and I am able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX. But, If I select "Capture & Post Ecxise Invoice" in MIGO, then only Part-1 is updating and even I am not able to post the Part-2 in J1IEX also as the status of the Excise Invoice is "Posted".
And, this is happening frequently during MIGO while selecting "Capture & Post Excise". So, I guess the Function Module / BADI which updates the J_1IPART2 is not getting triggered during MIGO. Once it triggers in MIGO, then Part-2 will be posting in GR itself.
Could you please let me know the standard FM / BADI which updates the Excise Invoice Part-2 (J_1IPART2). So that I'll check with my ABAPer whether it is triggering or not during the MIGO.
Thanks,
Satya

GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
Ashi

Hello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$

File not getting picked with Sender Adapter

Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev

Particular Perner not getting picked during simulation/ Live Run - Payroll

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for