Partner Determination Via Multiple Access Sequences

COM_PARTNER_BADI.
In a certain item level partner determination procedure for partner function ZPF, we use an access sequence of 1000.
As expected, we copy partners from the preceding document to our item. That is what we want.
We also want to invoke a COM_PARTNER_BADI Call to supplement the with additional partners.
I defined a two step access sequence.
10 10 COM_PARTNER_A Preceding Document
20 20 COM_PARTNER_X Badi 1
The BADI works but seems to wipe out the preceding document results.
Is there a way configure to get both the preceding document results and the new information.
( it would seem silly to make the badi determine the preceeding results as well)
In reality , there is only one preceding ZPF partner and one new ZPF partner, but we have the pdp set to allow 150 ).
Thanks.... ...Mike

Hi Sunil,
Thanks for your reply.I want to determine the service team automatically in the ibase based on the ibase postal code. I used the access seq 10000304 which uses the postal code to determine the service partner. but the determination is not triggered automatically in the ibase
Any hint will be of great help.
Ambarish

Similar Messages

Can one Condition type can have multiple access sequence?

hi,
Can one Condition type can have multiple access sequence?

Hello,
You can have one access sequence for condition type, but an access sequence can have more than one accesses.
Prase

Partner Determination via Ibase

Dear All,
Is there a possibility that service team can be determined based on the postal code of the ibase address? I could not find a rule or access sequence that can be used for this purpose.
Please help.
Regards,
Ambarish

Hi Sunil,
Thanks for your reply.I want to determine the service team automatically in the ibase based on the ibase postal code. I used the access seq 10000304 which uses the postal code to determine the service partner. but the determination is not triggered automatically in the ibase
Any hint will be of great help.
Ambarish

Bill-to-Party and Payer Partner Determination in CRM Sales Order

Hi,
In ECC, the sold-to-party has different bill-to-party and payer for each sales areas .For example:
Sold-to-party:2001826
For 8000 sales org/72 distribution channel:
Payer: 2004818
Bill-to-party: 2004818
For 2000 sales org/ 02 distribution channel:
Payer:2001826
Bill-to-party: 2001826
These business partners are in CRM system and the relationship data based on sales organization exists in CRMM_BUT_FRG0081 database table.
I customize access sequence for bill-to-party and payer in CRM system which uses CRM_PARTNER_A by using Sold-to-Party as source. However it does not determine via this access sequence. Do you have any idea why the system does not use this relationship info?
Best,
Damlanur

Hi there,
Please use note 493947 to ensure all the manual configuration is in place. Also the item category for the plant item must be ATP relevant, the following code check this:
FILL_BTM_PARTNER_PLANT SAPLCRM_DOWNLOAD_MAP
check if item type is relevant for ATP
 check not ls_item_type-atp_profile is initial.
map plant to business partner
 lv_loc_number = <ls_bapisdit>-plant.
 lv_loc_type = gc_atploctype-plant.
 call function 'CRM_CONFIRM_MAP_LOC_TO_BP'
 exporting
 iv_loc_number = lv_loc_number
 iv_loc_type = lv_loc_type
 importing
 ev_partner = lv_partner_no
 exceptions
 no_mapping_found = 1
 others = 2.
 check sy-subrc = 0.
If this still doesnt resolve the issue then you will have to debug the transfer queue stopping at function CRM_SALESDOC_MAP_BAPI2MBDOC to see why the data is not mapped.
I hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Vanessa.

Simple doubt in partner determination procedure

Hi gurus,
I have a problem with a partner determination procedure. I need that a marketing campaing has a partner determination procedure in which Responsible Person will be mandatory with two assignments.
In my partner determination procedure I select 2 as minumun value but the marketing campaing allows only one Responsible Person assigment.
It's possible to make a partner function mandatory with a minimun number of partners?
Thanks in advance.
Javier Merino

hi guys
i have a query regarding access sequence in partner determination in SAP CRM.problem is that when i am trying to create a partner determination procedure using access sequence
Business Partner Relationship->Activity Partner->User
having three partner functions :
Sales Prospect
Contact Person
Person Responsible
there is deadloack arising in contact person and person responsible i.e. partner function is not being determined using the above access sequence
i have maintained same relationship categories.please tell me whether deadlock is a problem or not because my main concern is when i am trying to run Lead using above mentioned partner determination procedure i am not able to run the LEAD.for instance ideally what should be happening is :
there are three blank boxes
one of contact person ,another of person responsible and finally of sales prospect.now since i have defined the BP relationship,so using above determination procedure what shoulod be happening is that if
m writing any BP no. in sales prospect then conatct person should be dispalyed automatically because of the relationship i have maintained in BP.
but its not happening ,i have to fill each entriers manually
please guide me to some solution
hoping of an immediate help to a silly problem which i guess m able to define appropriately
thanks & regards
ashish

Partner Determination/Organization Structure

Hi,
I wanted to understand how through partner determination procedure relevant Service Team can be assigned. You can use example of Standard Service Order Transaction SRVO, Standard Partner Determination Procedure 00006, Standard Access Sequence 011 Executing Service Organization, Standard Organization determination rule 1000278 and organization structure 50004983 to explain the connection.
Thanks
Deepak

Hi Deepak,
The description of rule 10000278 says,"
This rule should be used for partner determination via the orgdata model.
It delivers on the basis of orgattribute <H>executing
service organizations</>
It is intended
- for partner determination at item level
- for service items
- when using products in the service item
Executing service organizations are all
in the orgdata model with the following characteristics:
- Service Scenario
- Indicator for executing service organization is set.
These partners are filed as partners of the partner function
category executing service organization in the
transaction.
For example, org data determination is set up in the container after
the postal code and product.
regards,
Prashant
"please REWARD the points " if it helps..!!

JCST access sequence

Hi all.
We are currently using JCST condition to determine taxes in India.
JCST access sequence included in JCST condition has got three accesses (Fisrt seems to be for domestic, next for export business). Normally when the first is not determined, goes to the next sequence and so on.
The thing is that we have got an export sale order and as the system determines the first access sequence it stops here but this access is not for export, is domestic (Origin country/plant region/destination region/customer tax clasf/ material tax clasif). this is an standard.
I notice that if I fill the requirement field with a value "7" (domestic) in teh first sequence the next would be determined.
My question is: can I do that, modifying the standard? Is there any update missing iun my system? Why isn´t filled as standard?
Many thank in advance and best regards.

hi,
Tick that exclusion indicator and recheck the process
Regards,
Sudhir

SolMan 4.0: Support Team determination via Access Sequence not working

Hi,
from all the documentation I've read I got the following understanding for automatically determination of Support Team via Access Sequence (well, for one possibillity at least):
- Maintain Sold-to-Party in IBase IB52, especially country attribute. DONE
- Maintain Organizational Structure in PPOMA_CRM and create Org. Units, Business Partner No. get assigned automatically. DONE
- The Organizational Unit "Support Team" has the same country attribute as the Sold-to-Party and was marked "Obj. Permitted in Determination". DONE
- In IMG under SolMan -> Sc.-Specific Settings -> Partner Det. Proc. -> Def. Partner Det. Procedure select Procedure "SLFN0001" -> Partner Functions in Procedure -> Select "Support Team" -> Details, in block "Partner Determination" under "Access Sequence" select "Organizational data: Support Team by org. model". DONE
If I now create a support message in a satellite system the Support-Team will NOT be assigned. Instead if I have a look into transaction data of the message under tab "Actions" there is an entry "When message is created, find support team responsible" with processing parameters RULE AC13200137, PARTNER_FCT SLFN0003.
This makes absolutely no sense to me, why is the determination rule 13200137 used (which contains no entries at the moment) instead of the assigned Access Sequence?
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Marco Kipka

Hi,
no hint for solving the problem?
This is getting quite urgent, since I'm working at a customers site and try to implement the describted scenario.
Regards,
Marco

Which access sequence of Partner determination should be used?

Now my company is upgraded from CRM 2.0c to CRM 5.0 HR1. I found the different result about partner determination on business activity (via transaction code: CIC0) between two version.
On CRM 2.0C
Tcode: CIC0
Enter sold-to party code: 5300001 as activity partner, Contact person:244 on 'BP searching' workspace. Then on 'Maintain Business Transaction' workspace will display 5300001 as activity partner and 244 as Contact person.
Configuration:
Partner Function: 00000015 Contact person (CRM) using Access sequence 0002
Access sequence 0002 from activity partner
Dialog seq:10 has partner origin COM_PARTNER_A Preceding document and mark 'Determine in incorrect source partner'.
Dialog seq:20 has partner origin CRM_PARTNER_D General business partner model and have origin details; Partner Function category '0006 Activity partner' and Usage 'CRM'.
CIC0 of CRM 5.0 HR1
Tcode: CIC0
Enter sold-to party code: 5300001 as activity partner, Contact person:244 on 'BP searching' workspace. Then on 'Maintain Business Transaction' workspace will display 5300001 as activity partner and 66 as Contact person (66 is the first contact person of sold-to party master record:5300001).
Configation:
Partner Function: 00000015 Contact person (CRM) using Access sequence 0002
Access sequence 0002 from activity partner
Dialog seq:10 has partner origin COM_PARTNER_A Preceding document and mark 'Allow Incorrect Source'.
Dialog seq:20 has partner origin CRM_PARTNER_D DO NOT USE - General business partner model and have details on the source; Partner Function category '0006 Activity partner' and Usage 'CRM'.
Dialog seq:30 has partner origin CRM_PARTNER_C Business Partner Relationship and have details on the source; Partner Function category '0006 Activity partner' and Usage 'CRM'.
Please suggest me which access sequence should be used for getting the correct contact person (result same as CRM 2.0C).
Thanks you so much for support.

Hi,
to you receive the same result also in CRMD_ORDER, or only in CIC0. Please keep in mind that there is a difference! In CIC0 no pop-ups for selecting partners is executed, so the first contact person is taken (note 487734 gives a modification. Also the partner function of ICAGENT is necessary within CIC0.
From the view of CRMD_ORDER the following access sequence should be used:
10 COM_PARTNER_A Preceding Document
20 CRM_PARTNER_A BP Relationships By Sales Organization + Wait Flag + Partner Function category '0006 Activity partner' and Usage 'CRM'.
30 CRM_PARTNER_C Business Partner Relationships + Partner Function category '0006 Activity partner' and Usage 'CRM'.
Hope that this information is helpful!
Regards, Gerhard

Access sequence for Partner determination -Sales and Interaction Center CRM

Dear experts,
We use som transaction types both in our sales (t/c crmd_order) and in Interaction center (t/c CIC0).
We though want the partner determination to act differently when creating this transaction in sales compared
to when creating it in the interaction center. For example in the sales process we want the contact persons to be searched from the relationsship of the sold-to party but in customer service we do not want an automatic determination.
There are some BADIs available that can be used in the access sequences as a source but can they be used to
switch off some automatic determination when creating the transaction in t/c CIC0 whereas the automatic determination should work when creating the transaction in the sales process ie. t/c crmd_order?
Looking forward to have any input on this, thanks!
best regards,
Christina

Hi,
What we did is to remove the automatic determination on the transaction type that is used both in the sales process and Interaction center/customer service. The partner in question is only determined from the previous document in case you
create a follow-up document.
rgds,
Christina

Access sequence for partner determination

Hi,
I have created a new partnerfunction in CRM Online and assigned it to an existing partner-determination. Addtionially I use the standard access sequence '0004 User' for partner determination.
The partner must not be changeable in the sales transaction.
In the Online transaction everything works fine, but not on mobile sales.
The partnerfunction, the -determination-procecdure and the standard access sequence are already in the IDES-DB.
Is there any additional work I have to do in MSY or AMT?
Kind regards
Thomas

Hi,
you mean you already synchronized CRM_DNL_PAR_FCT, CRM_DNL_PAR_PDD and CRM_DNL_PAR_PDP?
Regards,
Wolfhard

Partner Determination Procedure-access sequence

Dear Gurus,
My requirement is support team determination when message is created.I maintained the Rule 13200137 in PFAC_RESPO.
In this below path in procedure SLFN0001 against partner function procedure of funcions SLFN0003 SUPPORT TEAM (CRM).IN THE PARNER DETERMINATION TAB acces sequence and Determination Time in Partner Determination are empty.
what values should i maintain here so that support team determination will happen as per the rule 13200137
SAP Solution Manager Implementation Guide -> SAP Solution Manager -> Configuration -> Scenario Specific Settings ->Service Desk -> Partner Determination Procedure -> Define Partner Determination Procedure.
plz guide me

Hey SAPuser,
You can use access sequence Organization data: Service Team using product or rule....
If this does not work out, then you need to work out some other access sequnce which starts with something like: Organization data: ........
Reward for usefull post...
Regards,
Anand

Continuous "Access Sequence" for partner determination procedure

Hi, I use access sequence for detemining BP in T-cd: CRMD_ORDER.
It seems that partner is determined only once.
If I enter BP and later on set different BP, access sequence only works for the first BP only.
Access sequence for the second BP never works.
Can I change custozming so that access sequence works every time I change BP?
Thanks and regards
Koji

Thank you, but my setting in Determination time is already set "Recurring".
But still acess sequence works only for the first BP. From the second BP, I have to manually push redetemination button. Not automaic.
Is this my version's problem?

Multiple records in 1 access sequence

Hi,
Is it possible to have the system find multiple condition records in the same access sequence step? For example, I have defined table 602 and added it in an access sequence. I create 2 condition records with unique keys. I want both to appear as output records in the billing document.
Table 602
Condition type | Billing Type | ZZPartner | Partner | Partner number | Medium
ZD00 | F2 | ZJ | ZJ | 1000111 | 2 (fax)
ZD00 | F2 | ZK | ZK | 1000777 | 5 (email)
I want both of these condition records to appear in the billing output. The way I have it configured now, only 1 record is determined. The bold fields are the keys.
Thanks in advance.
Maggie

Hi Maggie,
As per system Understanding it searches for condition records by Access sequence,where in table has assigned.
If you maitain two records for two types of scenario System stops at one record as record has been found and will not go and search further.
So with your settings system should change as medium also KEYFIELD.
Then system Differentiates 2 records and as per records the data will be determined.
CHANGE TABLE 602 WITH MEDIUM ALSO AS KEY FIELD.
Regards,
Reddyy

'Business Partner Assigned to the User' Access Sequence don't work

Hello.
I use access sequence 0008 (Business Partner Assigned to the User) in my Partner determination procedure. But it doesn't work. Corresponding Partner field in service document is empty. But I need that BP linked with logon user filled it.
I've made the same settings on another incstanse of SM and it's work. And what the difference between I don't understand.
Edited by: Dmitry Udot on Feb 13, 2011 2:31 AM

Sorry, but I don't quite get it. My purpose is to have 9 policies all working all the time (they did at in one version of firmware). I don't care about time entries for these. All 9 policies are full of keywords and websites to block webpages related to porn to one degree or another. The 10th policy is time-based to prevent internet access altogether for one or two computers through the wee hours of the morning. This, all in leu of having no parental controls.
Again, it would help if there was more detailed documentation on how this all works. This is the first I am aware that time settings in one policy could affect or impede the operation of other policies. How am I supposed to know this?
In any case, I appreciate your assistance and looking into this for me. But can you now tell me how to make it work so the policies will work as I want - the first 9 around the clock all the time, and the 10th one only from 1:30 am to 8:00 am (every day). Please instruct me on how I am supposed to configure this to work, and what specific settings I am supposed to enter... if it is even possible. Or is there another way of accomplishing this on my WRT54G (Rev. 2) product? Thanks.
Perry

Partner Determination Via Multiple Access Sequences

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for