Partner Function not picked in Scheduling agreement.

Hi
I have maintained the Partner functions in Vendor master.
But when i create a Scheduling agreement, the partner functions are not picked from Vendor master.
Can any body help on this please?
Thanks & regards,
Sasi

Dear Sir,
I am also face same problem.
AIM : I want to display manufacture name in good receipt.
I done : I have create one charecteristic for manufacture and in this charecteristic i have assign field of manufacture name which is maintain in vendor partner role. Then i have maintain one batch class RM_class and it assign to material.But when i want to display manufacture name in good receipt it is not display.
Analysis : The field of manufacture name is not saved in any table it is use in structure. so field of manucture is not caintain any value so it can't display any valve in good receipt.
Solution: If you give name of manufactue in CT04(charecteristic of manufacture) and this charecteristic assign to class(RM_class) then this class is assign to material.Than when you create good receipt and select manufacture name it will display at the time of batch determination and also when you want to dispaly mateiral list by manufacture you can see it with help of BMBC.
If you have any other idea please explan me.
Ragards,
Mahesh Wagh.

Similar Messages

Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

Hi Gurus,
Can you please advise on the below issue..
Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1) Create Delivery order (Order Type : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
Advance thanks for your valid points.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Hi Ram,
Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Question regarding SAP note 765494 and Scheduling agreements

In a SAP ECC 6.0 environment has anybody dealt with note 765494? It appears that the changes allow the user to change shipping data on stock transfer scheduling purchase orders using the ME22N screen (Enjoy) but not the ME32L scheduling agreement change screen. Does anybody know of a work around to change shipping data on a stock transfer scheduling agreement?

Hi Mahesh,
A contract is a type of outline purchase agreement against which release orders (releases) can be issued for agreed materials or services as and when required during a certain overall time-frame.
Contracts are of two types:
1. Quantity contracts - Use this type of contract if the total quantity to be ordered during the validity period of the contract is
known in advance.
2. Value contracts - Use this type of contract if the total value of all release orders issued against the contract is not to exceed a certain predefined value.
But a scheduling agreement is a form of outline purchase agreement under which materials are procured on predetermined dates within a certain time period. A scheduling agreement consists of a number of items, for each of which a procurement type is defined. The
The following are the procurement types:
- Standard
- Subcontracting
- Consignment
- Stock transfer
Delivery of the total quantity of material specified in a scheduling agreement item is spread over a certain period in a delivery schedule, consisting of lines indicating the individual quantities with their corresponding planned delivery dates.
Contracts and Scheduling Agreement transaction codes:
Transaction codes:
Contracts: ME31K to ME35K
Scheduling agreements: ME31L to ME35L.
Please award if helps!
Thanks!
preethi.

PR not adopted in Scheduling Agreement

I have created a Scheduling Agreement but when i add the Item from Create with Ref. to Purchase Requisition of that Material its not picking up the PR.
actually that PR no. is made in PR type ZIMP (our customized PR type)
but when I made the PR in PR Type PR for MRP then it picks ups the PR.
is there any settings to be done in IMG settings that certain PR type is linked with Scheduling agreement
if so where and how i can achieve this.
abhishek suppal

Hi,
Yes you have link with PR in SPRO.
This is the IMG Path <b>Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Scheduling Agreement --> Define Document Types</b>.
Here you have <b>Link purchase requisition - document type</b>.
Hope this will solve your problem.
--Ragu

Partner Functions not appearing

Hi
When the PO is created manually, the Partner Function is being picked up from the Vendor Master. But when the PO is created for the same vendor with reference to the PR, the Partner Functions are not being populated in PO. The Vendor Master has Partner Functions defined and the Partner Schema is assigned to the concerned Puchasing Document type and Vendor Account Group. Any specific reason why the Partner Functions are not appearing in PO when created with ref. to PR?
Regards
Prashanth

Hi,
Check vendo subrange or plant level data is ativated for that vendor.
Are you using the same material & Plant for both manual PO & PR to PO ?
Also check in partner determination > partne settings in purchasing documents > defie partner schemas, here end & higher level check mark is there?
Regads,
Prabu

TAXES not display into scheduling agreement

Dear gurus,
I have maintened info record & tax conditions for raw material.also create scheduling agreement with price update.But during display/change of shceduling agreement,while click on taxes tab-following message occur--FUNCTION NOT POSSIBLE FOR MATERIAL
Pl. deliver details,
Regards,
Devendra

I have mainten the tax code in me12,but it wnt get dispaly in me38 while selecting tab taxes,
Pl. deliver details
Regards,
Devendra

Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

Partner function not working when creating PO with ref to PReq

Partner function is not working when creating a Purchase Order with ref to a Purchase Requistion, Partner functions maintained in the vendor master are VN, OA & PI.
But OA & PI are not appearing in the PO header partner tab when created with ref to PR.
however it works when i create the PO directly ( without the PR ref )
I am using the same material & Plant for both manual PO & PR to PO.
Any idea what could be wrong .
I have maintained the settings for schema groups for vendor master & purchasing doc in the partner determination.
Thanks
Dkmurthy

Hi,
I have also an issue that seems similar to one you are discussing.
When we use ME59N and create a PO with ref. from a PR (created from a sales order), the message determination works well, it reads the condition set in MN04 (condition records for messages), and creates a message (with output type for EDI , medium: 6, and partner function LS: Logical system). Message is created and idoc is sent.
When we try with ME21N, ME21 and we create the PO with ref. to the same PR, either by entering manually the PR in the document overview of ME21N or by selecting the PR (without entering the PR number), i.e with date, the message is not created in the PO.
Company code is assigned to purchase organization, and so is purchase organization to plant.
Any idea why there is no automatic message determination in the case of the transaction: ME21N
Note: If I try ME21N, and enter the output type and partner, manually, I receive a warning message
VN006 (Partner XXXX does not exist for partner function LS). If I accept this warning message, then message is saved- idoc is sent. However I can not overcome the warning message, if it plays any role, because I can not assign partner function LS to the vendor.Then I receive message CZ 327 (Can not use this partner role).
Any input is wellcome.

EDI Message not Transmitted for Scheduling Agreement

Hi guys!
Does anybody know what should I check to see why the EDI message for a delivery line in the scheduling agreement has not been transmitted? Would really save me
Regards,
Ileana

Hi
First check the message whether it has been processed properly or not . goto ME39 , Check the message(Shift +F1)
if the message is in red, check the processing log,
If the message is in yellow , process the same using ME9E
If the message is in grren means the Idoc's are generated.
Now got Transaction WE05 & Check the IDoc's giving the Basic type - DELFOR02
Give from & to dates based on the rpocessing date of the message.
Here check the Idoc's are in Red or green . If in red check the Message in the Status.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Header text not printed for scheduling agreement

Hi All,
I have issue with header text print out for scheduling agreement (SA).
In SA when I am manually writing some note and then taking print out, system is giving me correct output with maual note.
I have one standard text (ST) which I need to be printed in evry SA, so in SPRO I created new head text for vendor and in copying rule for text for SA, I created linkage of SA header text with Vendor head text.
In vendor master, I inserted ST in newly created vendor header text.
So now when ever I create new SA for vendor system will determin header text from vendor master.
Now after creating SA when I check the SA, I am able to my ST in SA, but at the time of print out this ST in not printing.
Please let me know what could be the reson.
Regards,
Sameer

I dont understand about what you mean by expand.
When you a print PO, PO text (header or item) it will check to the configuration setting.
The system didnt care if its adopted from vendor master or info record, or whatever you make in the copying rule.
In your case : you create a standard text then it get copied into PO , then you set the standard text to the PO for print out, example the standard text : word is
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Then in the PO the text appear will be like below(the same, because it get copied)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
If you configure it in define text for SA, then it the print out it will also (the same)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
So what text need to expand?

Quantity not modifiable in scheduling agreement for specific valuation clas

Hi Gurus,
My client wants once the scheduling agreement is created then the quantity should not be changed later. This they want only for a specifically for imported materials. So is it possible to make the quantity greyed in the change screen for a materials with specific valuation class.
Regards,
Yuvaraj

Can you please let me know where I can check the authorizations? If you are mentioning about roles and authorizations (those Security team provides) those are all provided correctly.
Thank you.

Idoc - Partner Function not getting captured.

Dear all,
I am using IDOC (type - /NFM/ORDERS05) to send a Purchase Order. The Idoc is getting created but the only a few partner function is getting captured from the Partners tab in the ME22n transaction. The remaining partner functions that are not captured are SP (Forwarding Agent) and ER (Employee responsible).
Any bright ideas how to solve this problem.
Points will be awarded.

Hi Vivek,
Thanks for your reply.
1. Where do i have set the receiver port and the message type for each "partner fuction". We do this generally for a Partner Type. (Please clarify)
2. If I remove the syntax check box then my PO is not getting created in ME21n transaction.
3. I have checked the Partner types there is not problem with that.
Regards,
Gajanan.

Partner functions not adopting in RFQ and Purchase order

I have maintained all partner function coustamizations to vendor account group , in vendor master i am getting to all partner function , but in RFQ and PO i am getting only VN ,iam not getting GS,IP,etc.............
Regards
G.vijay kumar

HI,
Check the configuration for partner determination:
SPRO->Materials ManagementPurchasingPartner Determination-Partner Settings in Purchasing Documents > Define Partner Schemas> 0002Normal Purchase Ordr--set the partner function as mandatory, so it will adopt during PO.
Regards
KK

Partner function not copied from notification to order

hi
i am using same partner determination procedure for notification and service order. i have defined some new partner functions in the procedure. the problem i'm facing is that only the partner functions which are made mandatory are getting copied from notifictaion to order. however i cannot make all the partner functions mandatory because they may not be relevant for all cases.
is this common behaviour of system and if so is there any solution (without making partner functions mandatory)
thanks in advance
koustav

Hi,
This is a Standard Functionality . You can try using the below USER-EXIT for your requirement.
EXIT_SAPLV09A_002:
Use this is customer has to be maintained to a specific sales area.
EXIT_SAPLV09A_003:
This suits more of your requirement.
INCLUDE ZXV09U03 - Add your code to copy the specific partner alone to the Doucment if it is an NOTIFICATION TO ORDER alone.
This is used to control the orgin of partners in the Partner determination procedure..
Hope this helps.

Partner Function Check while changing partner Functions not assigned to SP

Dear All,
I have created a Partner profile and its working fine.
But recently there was a problem reported, where in the User changed the Bill to Party at the Sales order header which was not defiend in the Customer Master, this Bill to Customer was defined in the same sales Area as the Order was.
The Problem is it was a typo error by teh user while modifying the default Bill To. They realsied it only after the Invocie was sent to a different payer.
Could we have a check built in where the system pops up error when we choose a partner function which is not assigned in the Customer master??
And to my surpise now I noticed that its allowing me to enter any Bill to and payer Partned which is defined in the Sales Area as the Sales Order is.
I expect to have someting in teh customisation to give up a error.
Thansk for all your help.

System will accept any SH/PY/BP in same sale area to put in sale order, this is the std functionality.
In order to change this u need to use Userexit.
In MV45AFzz and Include in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE you can have the same logic to put error while PY/SH/BP not in CMR.
Sam

Partner Function not picked in Scheduling agreement.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for