Pass through camera, looking to buy. Suggestions?

Hi,
I'm looking to streamline how I make videos. I've tried using iMovie with a Canon Vixia HF200. But couldn't get the video from the card. I maxed out my RAM to 8 GB, put in a 1TB drive and still didn't work. I did the trial of FCP and while that made importing video from the card, I'm not sold on the expense of that app just yet. (Editing in it was hard as I should have spent the $$ on a 7200 RPM drive instead of a 5400.)
The videos I'm trying to make are demos of my classical guitar performances for youtube, FB etc. The first one I did used the iSight camera with a decent mic: AKG 420. The Canon takes a nice picture but the hassle of using Handbrake and syncing audio from Garageband is just not my idea of how I can best accomplish the task for my needs. Further, the pass through allows me to have a video monitor when I'm setting the shots up by myself.
So, valued community, would you have any suggestions for a camera that might fit the

Similar Messages

New events in iCal are entered on my iMac. These events pass through correctly to my other computers and iPhone. However, each new event shows up twice on my iPads. The clutter is distracting. Anyone have suggestion as to correcting this annoyance?

New events in iCal are entered on my iMac. These events pass through correctly to my other computers and iPhone. However, each new event shows up twice on my iPads. The clutter is distracting. Anyone have suggestion as to correcting this annoyance?

New events in iCal are entered on my iMac. These events pass through correctly to my other computers and iPhone. However, each new event shows up twice on my iPads. The clutter is distracting. Anyone have suggestion as to correcting this annoyance?

I am a male, and am looking at buying an ipod touch 5, i do not know what color i should get, does anyone have any suggestions on what ipod touch colors are best for guys

I am a guy and i am looking at buying an ipod touch 5, i do not know what color i should get, does anyone have any suggestions on what ipod touch colors are best for guys?

The Product Red model

I'm looking at buying an IPad and was wondering if it has the capacity to replace a video camera.

I'm looking at buying an IPad and was wondering if it has the capacity to replace a video camera. I'm looking at the 128GB version and I know there are many variables. But I'm thinking that it should hold at least 60 mintues of video before needing it to be downloaded. Thoughts?

If you want to record good video, get a camera.
iPads can record video but they lack almost all other useful features of a dedicated camera - eg a decent lens, the ability to zoom, reasonable audio, removable media, small form factor .... and on and on.
x

I am looking to buy the least expensive high resolution digital video camera to convert/record 8mm video tapes.

Hi. Thanks for your help in advance.
I am looking to buy the least expensive digital video camera with the highest resolution I can find in order to use it to record 100s of old (1960s era ) reel to reel video tapes. I am told that in order to do that I must record the "old" video onto a new platform, which means I will set up an "old" projector and play the tapes and record the video on a digital camera. I only want to do this once so I want the highest resolution format I can find. Therefore, I am looking for a camera to purchase. Any help is appreciated.

Hello Lance,
Transferring film to digital video is a complex, challenging process. To cut to the chase, the best way to do this is to engage a firm that specializes in film-to-digital transfer services. There are quite a few around. Costs for 8mm transfer range anywhere from about $0.15 - $0.40 per foot and there are usually significant discounts for bulk projects. Plus, depending on the cost of the video camera you would otherwise consider buying, you may find it costs less overall to use a service than do it yourself.
You also mentioned that you "want the highest resolution format" ... Once you project 8mm/Super8 film onto a screen the effective resolution will not even be what we might consider "standard-def" in digital video. And the larger the projected image the lower & lower the effective resolution regardless of what kind of video camera you might use.
A transfer service, however, directly scans each frame to digitize them and depending on the math the resulting digital image may technically be as "good" as 720p ... but the overall image quality will still be limited by the quality of the original film ... and still probably not up the level of "standard-def" digital video ... but way better than anything you could obtain with a homebrew projector-screen-videocam setup.
Why DIY? Well, it sounds inexpensive and simple. But in reality it is a very time consuming way to get relatively low quality transfers no matter how high-end or expensive a video camera you use. I can share more details if necessary, but DIY film-to-video transfer is not the way to go if you are really interested in quality results.

Data has changed after passing through FIFO?

Dear experts,
I am currently working on a digital triangular shaping using the 7966R FPGA + 5734 AI. I am using LabView 2012 SP1.
Some days ago I have encountered a problem with my FIFOs that I have not been able to solve since. I'd be glad if somebody could point out a solution/ my error.
Short description:
I am writing U16 variables between ~32700-32800 to a U16 configured FIFO. The FIFO output does not coincide with the data I have been writing to the FIFO but is rather bit-shifted or something is added. This problem does not occure if I execute the VI on the dev. PC with simulated input.
What I have done so far:
I am reading all 4 channels of the 5734 inside a SCTL. The data is stored in 4 feedback nodes I am applying a triangular shaping to channel 0 and 1 by using 4 FIFOs that have been prefilled with a predefined number of zeros to serve as buffers. So it's something like (FB = Feedback node):
A I/O 1 --> FB --> FIFO 1 --> FB --> FIFO 2 --> FB --> Do something
A I/O 2 --> FB --> FIFO 3 --> FB --> FIFO 4 --> FB --> Do something
This code shows NO weird behaviour and works as expected.
The Problem:
To reduce the amount of FIFOs needed I then decided to interleave the data and to use only 2 FIFOs instead of 4. You can see the code in the attachment. As you can see I have not really changed anything to the code structure in general.
The input to the FIFO is a U16. All FIFOs are configured to store U16 data.
The data that I am writing to the FIFO can be seen in channel 0 of the output attachment.
The output after passing through the two FIFOs can be seen in channel 2 of the same picture.
The output after passing through the first FIFO (times 2) can be seen in channel 3 of the picture.
It looks like the output is bit-shifted and truncated as it enters Buffer 1. Yet the difference between the input and output is not exactly a factor of 2. I also considered the possibility that the FIFO adds both write operations (CH0 + CH1) but that also does not account for the value of the output.
The FIFOs are all operating normally, i.e. none throws a timeout. I also tried several different orders of reading/writing to the FIFOs and different ways of ensuring this order (i.e. case strucutres, flat and stacked sequence). The FIFOs are also large enough to store the amount of data buffered no matter if I write or read first.
Thank you very much,
Bjorn
Attachments:
FPGA-code.png ‏61 KB
FPGA-output.png ‏45 KB

During the last couple of days I tried the following:
1. Running the FPGA code on the development PC with simulated I/O. The behavior was normal, i.e. like I've intended the code to perform.
2. I tested the code on the development PC with the square and sine wave generation VI as 'simulated' I/O. The code performed normal.
3. I replaced the FIFOs with queues and ran my logic on the dev. PC. The logic performed totally normal.
4. Right now the code is compiling with constants as inputs like you suggested...
I am currently trying to get LabView 2013 on the development machine. It seems like my last real hope is that the issue is a bug in the XILINX 13.4 compiler tools and that the 14.4 tools will just make it disappear...
Nevertheless I am still open for suggestions. Some additional info about my FIFOs of concerne:
Buffer 1 and 2:
- Type: Target Scoped
- Elements Requested: 1023
- Implementation: Block Memory
- Control Logic: Target Optimal
- Data Type: U16
- Arbitrate for Read: Never Arbitrate
- No. Elements Per Read: 1
- Arbitrate for Write: Never Arbitrate
- No. Elements Per Write: 1
The inputs from the NI 5734 are U16 so I am wirering the right data type to the FIFOs. I also don't have any coercion dots within my FPGA VI. And so far it has only occured after the VI has been compiled onto the FPGA. Could some of the FIFOs/block memory be corrupted because we have written stuff onto the FPGA too often?

I think I have mastered the "What camera should I buy" issue.

I have been doing research for months now on which camera is best.
I have looked at every model, every brand, read their specs and checked their features.
Things could change, but for now:
ONLY CAMERAS WITH A FIRE WIRE PORT AND A MINIDV TAPE WILL WORK WITH iMOVIE directly with EASE OF USE, BEST QUALITY and LEAST AMOUNT OF COMPRESSION ISSUES.
Two choices:
1. High Definition cameras:
Conclusion: They all suck. It is a question of which one ***** the least. In my opinion it is the Canon HV20 ($1099.99). It has the best features (I love the 24p mode) for the money. I think Apple agrees with me, they sell it in the Apple Store. If only it had a decent 3CCD lens that worked well in low light, it would be perfect. If you are only going to shoot in good light, no problem.
Why I think they suck? NONE of the HD consumer level cameras have inputs for analogue and high definition video for recording from older equipment like VCRs and new equipment like cable boxes that output HD TV. This means you cannot record your favorite HD TV program OR MOVIE and make a HD DVD (Blue-ray or HD-DVD) with no loss of quality.
NOTE: The upper end cameras like the Sony HDR-FX1 ($3699,99) and the Canon XL-H1 (7,999.99) are the only cameras that don't suck, but the prices do.
WARNING ABOUT HD
YOU WILL NEED A POWERFUL COMPUTER LIKE THE NEW MAC PROS WITH 2 GIG OF RAM AND HUGE HUGE AMOUT OF HARD DRIVE STORAGE and Final Cut Pro TO BE HAPPY WORKING WITH HIGH DEFINITION VIDEO.
2. SD Cameras.
I like the Sony DCR-HC96. ($649.99) It has Analog-to-Digital Converter (with Pass Through) and Analog Audio/Video Input(s) (Multi A/V)
This camera is perfect for any Mac user with older machines like the dual G4's and older G5's.

I guess we can agree to disagree.
From your post:
<ONLY CAMERAS WITH A FIRE WIRE PORT AND A MINIDV TAPE WILL WORK WITH iMOVIE directly with EASE OF USE, BEST QUALITY and LEAST AMOUNT OF COMPRESSION ISSUES.
<div class="jive-quote">That is not really correct. HDV camcorders do employ MiniDV tapes and connect via firewire, but do have compression issues due to the MPEG-2 recording format.
I said "The LEAST amount of compression issues" I did not say they do not have compression. SO YOU DID NOT UNDERSTAND.
The you said:
<YOU WILL NEED A POWERFUL COMPUTER LIKE THE NEW MAC PROS WITH 2 GIG OF RAM AND HUGE HUGE AMOUT OF HARD DRIVE STORAGE and Final Cut Pro TO BE HAPPY WORKING WITH HIGH DEFINITION VIDEO.
<div class="jive-quote">Incorrect again. My iBook G4, 1.25 Ghz, 512 RAM handles HDV just fine (apart from the slow capture speed) and if your final output is an SD DVD, there's always the possibility to let the camera do the downconversion and edit in SD.
I said "To be happy working with high definition video". It should have been clear to you that I am saying NO SLOW CAPTURE, and CREATING AN HD MOVIE FROM START TO FINISH. FINISH meaning Blu-ray or HD-DVD (with software from the future) in less than 6 hours. Your little G4 with 512 RAM will NOT be able to handle that when it becomes available. I hate how slow my MDD dual G4 which I upgraded to 1.5 Gig of RAM performs when working with SD video. I would cry if I had to go your speed. (Ergo NOT HAPPY) You said "If your output is SD" I did not say SD, I was referring to HD so,,,YOUR WRONG AGAIN.
My point is that HD cameras are just not fully compatible with the Mac, and most (as normal) support Windowz with USB2 more than OSX.
We cannot make full use of HD on our Macs until we can make HD DVDs.
Do you get it now?

Trying to find a camcorder that records in 60 frames per second and will upload onto ipad2 through camera connector

Trying to find a camcorder that records in 60 frames per second and will upload onto ipad2 through camera connector

Old forum discussion, message now gone, but here's the summary
Matt with Grass Valley Canopus in their tech support department stated that the model 110 will suffice for most hobbyist. If a person has a lot of tapes that were played often the tape stretches and the magnetic coding diminishes. If your goal is to encode tapes in good shape buy the 110, if you will be encoding old tapes of poor quality buy the model 300
Both the 110 and 300 are two way devices so you may output back to tape... if you don't need that, look at the model 55
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc55 One Way Only to Computer
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc110 for good tapes, or
http://www.grassvalley.com/products/advc300 better with OLD tapes
Or
ADS Pyro http://www.adstechnologies.com

MIAW WindowType - preventing pass-through clicks, but non-modal?

Other than the 10 types listed in the Help files, does anyone
know about any
other window types? What I'm specifically looking for is like
a tool
palette - which floats over the stage, but if you click on
it, the clicks do
not pass through the MIAW to the stage below it. So far, the
only way I
know to do that is to make it a modal dialog box, which is
NOT what I want,
because I want to still be able to click on things on the
stage, just not if
they're directly behind the tool palette.
Alternatively, is there a way to make sure all mouse-clicks
within a MIAW do
NOT pass through to the stage behind it? I'm using type 4,
"Movable window
without size box or zoom box", which seems to be the closest
one to what I
want, but I need to stop those pass-through clicks from
messing up the
stage...

"Darrel Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The point of checking for MouseDown inside a MouseWithin
handler is
> that you can click and "paint" tiles over any number of
sprites,
> without having to release the mouse button and click
each sprite
> individually. If I put everything into MouseUp/MouseDown
handlers,
> then you'd have to click each sprite one by one in order
to change
> the tiles, which is incredibly tedious compared the
smooth
> click-and-drag method I'm using.
>
> As I've said, checking to see if the mouse is within the
rect of the
> MIAW *does* prevent clickthroughs. In other words, I do
have a
> working solution to my problem. I just still think it's
far more
> code than should be necessary to do what should by all
rights happen
> by default, especially since I have to incorporate this
same code
> into several different mouse events in a bunch of
different
> behaviors. (It will be even worse if I at some point
decide to have
> more than one tool palette MIAW up at the same time for
some reason,
> since I'd have to check for each of them, and then check
*within*
> each of them as well in case they overlap eachother...)
>
> We kind of got sidetracked with the whole idea of a
moving sprite
> underneath the MIAW to catch stray mouse events - a
technique which
> doesn't work 100% because moving the MIAW causes a stray
mouse-click
> when you release it.
>
> I just wish there were some default setting for MIAW's
which
> prevented clickthroughs automatically. It's pretty much
an
> aesthetic thing now, since I have a working solution,
but I don't
> like ugly code (even if nobody but me will ever see it),
and I wish
> there was a better way to do it. Just seems like it
should be the
> default behavior. Think of any other program you've
seen. Indeed,
> since we all know Director, think of that. Say you've
got the Score
> window and the Cast window and the Script window and
> who-knows-what-else all open at once, and they're all
overlapping on
> your screen. When you click on one, only the one on top
responds.
> This is what you expect when you click on something in
any program.
> You'd run into all kinds of problems if the ones
underneath also
> responded to your clicks (or any other mouse events for
that
> matter). This is basically the same thing I'm trying to
do with my
> little tool palette, but it seems you have to write a
whole bunch of
> scripts just to make that happen? That just doesn't seem
right to
> me.
>
> Anyhow, thanks for your suggestions everyone. And if
anyone knows a
> way to make MIAW's do this automatically, please let me
know.
Darrel,
out of all the possible ways to do what you want, you have
probably
picked the worse.
Now you run into trouble, of course.
First:
Read up on the way events are processed in Director, and
passed or not
passed from object to object.
Second:
Did you actually READ what I wrote? You just keep repeating
the same
things that dont make sense...
The mouseDown event is not the problem, the problem is that
you check
for a mouseDown STATE, not handle a mouseDown EVENT.
You can change your code easily to provide for this and have
the same
result.
Third:
When mouseClicks are somehow not intercepted in the MIAW,
then handle
them yourself in the MIAW.
I agree with Mike that it is your approach to the problem
that creates
this complexity.
If you stick to handling events in the way Director gives
them to you,
you will not have those strange things.
good luck,
Richad.

YN 622C pass-through TTL with 430 EX II?

Have Canon T5i, Canon 430 EX II flash.
I bought a set of Yongnuo YN622C radio TTL triggers, and they work great for OFF-camera TTL. I can set my 430EXII anywhere around a room and it shoots with perfect full TTL.
But when I have the YN622C on the Camera hotshoe, then put the 430EXII on top of that, right on the camera, the flash fires only as a manual flash.
The YN622C is supposed to have "pass through" ability - passing TTL settings through to the 430EXII mounted on top, but mine is not working. I want to have one TTL flash on top of the trigger, on the camera, for a fill flash, and then another flash on the remote trigger for an off-camera flash.
Has anyone else used these triggers with success? Do I just have a set of faulty triggers that should be returned? or is there some special trick that I'm missing to get TTL pass through?. It seems awfully strange that they work for OFF-camera TTL, but do not work when everything is mounted directly to the camera.

You should be able to have "pass through". It seemed to work Okay when I tried it.
I would suggest doing a Reset/Clear to default.
Here is a link to a very good resource for using the YN-622C. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B77OmmGIg0gMVFpqNkpBYXBHajA/edit
Mike Sowsun
S110, SL1, 5D Mk III

Pass Through Theme Still Not "Passing Through"

So I'm working on this project and it looks completely AWESOME on my computer with the "pass through" theme, but when I burn it to DVD I just get a blurry picture behind a "white" scrolling title. I know this has been addressed before and I've checked out all the "fixes" so far on this issue from past topics but I'm still pulling my hair out.
I've tried "deleting my preferences" and "repairing my permissions" but still end up with the same thing... a white scrolling text over a blurry picture. My Mac is only 2 months old!
Perhaps the solution is to just fly my family out to watch the dvd on my computer???
Help! Anyone? Bueller?

Nevermind!
I went back to an awesome answer by Rich839 who suggested the following:
+Sometimes permissions and preferences can get corrupted. Whenever iDVD starts acting funny, a common maintenance procedure is to do the following: Delete preferences by closing iDVD and trashing the file com.apple.iDVD.plist found in User (the House icon)/Library/Preferences. Then do a permissions repair using the Utilities/Disk Utility App on your Mac. Open the Disk Utilities window and select the Mac hard drive icon at the top of the side pane at the left. Then click on the Repair Permissions button. When you have repaired permissions and deleted preferences, restart your computer and launch iDVD. iDVD will replace the .plist file that you deleted. Be sure also that you have sufficient free disk space on your hard drive for iDVD to function correctly. 25GB often is recommended by users of this forum. After doing all of the above, relaunch iDVD and see whether you still have the problem.+
I failed to restart my computer after deleting and repairing, but after I did the above seemed to work! *crosses fingers* At least the "Pass Through" feature seems to be working in the little preview window while it's burning. Before, the scrolling text in the preview window was just white!
Hope this somehow helps others who've had the same issue!

No title scrolling on menus w/ Pass-Through theme

I did not see this addressed when I searched the discussions.
I created a iDVD project using the Pass-Through theme. Everything looks good. But when saved to disk image, the cut-out titles that scroll across the menu screens are missing, so of course the burned disk is missing it.
This is actually what makes the theme so nice, so not having it is a real problem.
I can't find anything to do differently when creating this project since it looks fine before the burn/save as disc image process.
I would appreciate any suggestions/solutions.

Managed to fix it by shutting down the computer, then restarting again. Made a text correction in the movie title and did a 'Save As' and then made a new disk image. Perfect this time! Not sure what the issue was, but this resolved it.

Allow PPTP pass through

Hi all,
I have a Pix 515e version 6.1(5) I need to let PPTP pass through, is there any special configuration I have to do?
I have already enabled the pptp on the ACLs.
Thanks.

Hi,
If you have a device in the LAN to which you connect then I think you will need to configure Static NAT for that device to give it a public IP address. There is also a "inspect pptp" configuration.
The software on your firewall is so old that I am not sure what the configuration format is though. I think in the older softwares the above "inspect" command was actually "fixup pptp"
I would suggest looking at replacing your current firewall. The current software level is very very old.
- Jouni

Vidcam pass through to iMovie without firewire?

Hi folks,
I'm looking to upgrade to a Retina Macbook Pro, but one of the things I need to do on a daily basis is record straight to iMovie via Firewire 800 with my cam acting as pass through. Is anyone currently doing this on the new Retina MBPs without firewire? What ports, cables etc are you using to accomplish this?
Thanks

So, am I the only person in the world who does this?

Cisco ASA 5505 L2TP Pass through

I am having trouble with L2TP pass through on an ASA 5505 device.
L2TP server: OSX 10.6
I can connect with any OSX system and it works fine straight away.
When connecting with a windows computer I get a 789 error. "Error 789: The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountere a processing error during the initial negotiations with the remote computer."
I did not setup or configure the device to start with and apart from this issue its working fine so I am hessitant at trying to just mess around too much to try and find the problem.
I am using the ASDM 6.4 to manage the device.
Ports look to be forwarded correctly; 1701, 4500 & 500 UDP.
Im just looking for other common issues?
Rob

Below is the commands you wanted.
Where you see: IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING
This is an IP I dont know. possible and old IP address.
and
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
This is an old domain from years ago.
Result of the command: "show run crypto"
crypto ipsec transform-set aes-sha esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set aes-192-sha esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set aes-256-sha esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set 3des-sha esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set transform-amzn esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 1 set pfs group5
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 1 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 2 set pfs
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 2 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 3 set pfs
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 3 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 4 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
crypto map outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
crypto map outside_map 1 set peer IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3
crypto map outside_map 1 set transform-set ESP-DES-SHA
crypto map outside_map 2 match address acl-amzn
crypto map outside_map 2 set pfs
crypto map outside_map 2 set peer IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING
crypto map outside_map 2 set transform-set transform-amzn
crypto map outside_map 255 ipsec-isakmp dynamic map-dynamic
crypto map outside_map interface outside
crypto isakmp identity address
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 1
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 2
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 3
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 1
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 11
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 12
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 13
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-192
hash sha
group 1
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 21
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 22
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 23
authentication pre-share
encryption aes
hash sha
group 1
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 31
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 32
authentication rsa-sig
encryption des
hash sha
group 1
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 33
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 1
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 34
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
Result of the command: "show run group-policy"
group-policy evertest internal
group-policy evertest attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy petero internal
group-policy petero attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy awsfilter internal
group-policy awsfilter attributes
vpn-filter value amzn-filter
group-policy vpnpptp internal
group-policy vpnpptp attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-tunnel-protocol l2tp-ipsec
group-policy vanheelm internal
group-policy vanheelm attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy ciscoVPNuser internal
group-policy ciscoVPNuser attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.10
vpn-idle-timeout 720
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy chauhanv2 internal
group-policy chauhanv2 attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy oterop internal
group-policy oterop attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
group-policy Oterop internal
group-policy Oterop attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 30
group-policy chauhanv internal
group-policy chauhanv attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 30
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
group-policy bnixon2 internal
group-policy bnixon2 attributes
dns-server value 10.100.25.252
vpn-idle-timeout 720
vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
pfs enable
split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
Result of the command: "show run tunnel-group"
tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser type remote-access
tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy ciscoVPNuser
tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group petero type remote-access
tunnel-group petero general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy petero
tunnel-group petero ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group oterop type remote-access
tunnel-group oterop general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy oterop
tunnel-group oterop ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group vanheelm type remote-access
tunnel-group vanheelm general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy vanheelm
tunnel-group vanheelm ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group chauhanv type remote-access
tunnel-group chauhanv general-attributes
default-group-policy chauhanv
tunnel-group Oterop type remote-access
tunnel-group Oterop general-attributes
default-group-policy Oterop
tunnel-group chauhanv2 type remote-access
tunnel-group chauhanv2 general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy chauhanv2
tunnel-group chauhanv2 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group bnixon2 type remote-access
tunnel-group bnixon2 general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy bnixon2
tunnel-group bnixon2 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group vpnpptp type remote-access
tunnel-group vpnpptp general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy vpnpptp
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING4 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING4 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group evertest type remote-access
tunnel-group evertest general-attributes
address-pool vpnippool
default-group-policy evertest
tunnel-group evertest ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group evertest ppp-attributes
authentication ms-chap-v2
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 general-attributes
default-group-policy awsfilter
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
isakmp keepalive threshold 10 retry 3
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING general-attributes
default-group-policy awsfilter
tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key *****
isakmp keepalive threshold 10 retry 3
Result of the command: "show vpn-sessiondb detail remote filter protocol L2TPOverIPsec"
INFO: There are presently no active sessions of the type specified
Result of the command: "show vpn-sessiondb detail remote filter protocol L2TPOverIPsecOverNAT"
INFO: There are presently no active sessions of the type specified

Pass through camera, looking to buy. Suggestions?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for