Passenger support for OS X Maverick

It would appear that Passenger only officially supports up to OS X 10.7, although I used it with 10.8 last year. I'm now thinking of upgrading to Maverick. Does anyone know if Passenger will work on Maverick, and if not, is there a similar product that works effectively and easily for creating dozens (around 80-90) userids and passwords for Maverick?
Thanks for your help!

I've never heard of it before, so I can't answer on that. Have you talked to the support group for said software?
Note, in IT, always have a testing environment for trying out new products and software... This is a prime case for such.
On the test computer, install Mavericks, install server, and install passenger, test it out, see what happens.

Similar Messages

  • Disabled scan functionality of HP Officejet 4500 Wireless with 10.9.1. HP says this printer is not supported for 10.9. Is there a solution?

    HP Officejet 4500 Wireless with 10.9.1 - Problem is not the printer, just the scanner. The scanner seems to be working but the saved files are not good images, just a bunch of scanned lines. My printer shows up under Preferences>printers and Scanners.
    I have found a clumsy work around  - accessing the scanner under Preferences>printers and Scanners allows me to produce a savable file. Problem is I loose functionality provided in the standard HP mode. Specifically I cannot change the image size. Doing that under Preferences>printers and Scanners just makes the window around the picture larger, it doesn't scale the image itself.
    My HP connection is strictly with USB, I do not use the wireless feature.
    HP tells me this printer is no longer supported for 10.9 Maverick. Is there anything else I can do to regain the scalable image size functionality with this printer/operating system combo?
    Thanks,
    Rcintio_Gray

    I hear ya. My son and his young growing familiy live in Torrey Heights near SD and I have a daughter in FL. They are smart kids.
    Thanks again

  • Support for OSX 10.9 (Mavericks)?

    Hi,
    I gather that InCopy supports 10.6.8, 10.7 and 10.8. Is there any planned support for the new OSX 10.9 (Mavericks)?
    InDesign already supports 10.9, so hopefully InCopy will also support it!
    Regards,
    Srijith

    Thanks for the response. I am using CS6 (8.0.2). When I try to click on the icma files to open, I get a popup - Cannot open filename.icma   If I drag and drop the file into an open InCopy window I get the popup
    What could be going wrong? Would uninstall-install do any good?

  • Setup Error says "Contact Adobe Customer Support for Assistance" but that seems impossible. I'm trying to install CS3 on Maverick.  Shall I just give it up as hopeless, and kiss my Adobe software goodbye?

    I've gone around and around the Adobe Customer Support website, and it only allows me to post a query in the support group.
    I downloaded a dmg of CS3. I have my license number ready.
    I try to install it, and I get the error message:
    Setup Error
    Setup has encountered an error and cannot continue. Contact Adobe Customer Support for assistance.
    But I can't contact them. Adobe support just goes in circles. Now what?
    Maybe CS3 doesn't work on OSX Mavericks.  It would help if they would just say so.

    some people have had some success, http://roaringapps.com/apps:table
    you should run the cleaner and then try and install, Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6
    if that fails with the same nondescript message, check your install logs, Troubleshoot with install logs | CS5, CS5.5, CS6, CC

  • Help! Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"

    I'm on a MacBook 13" mid 2010, OS X 10.7.5, I want to upgrade to OS X Mavericks. I have searched around for a few days, I find people with the same problem but can't really get the solution for it. I prefer not to reinstall OS X, I want to upgrade. I don't have boot camp or something just a 250 GB HD.
    Well, while I'm trying to upgrade from the download from Apps Store, I open the installer, press continue then accepts the Terms.. then select Macintosh HD and click install, then an warning message shows up "Some features of Mac OS X Mavericks are not supported for the disk "Macintosh HD"
    As I've read the article that is included in the waring message i did try to install anyway because it say that I would be fine, but when i did try to install the installer starts and after like 3 minutes a window appears, Install Failed.
    I've even try to make a installer on USB, both with the command in terminal and with Diskmaker, but it does not help.
    It seems impossible to upgrade. Please Help me.

    First, see the heading "What to do if the installer warns that no Recovery System can be created" in this support article. If you use Boot Camp, back up and delete the Windows partition using Boot Camp Assistant. Try the installation again.

  • Mavericks support for ARD - when will this occur?

    WHen being launched, ARD says it is incompatible with Mavericks - will this be fixed, and when?

    None of us here know or can say when ARD will be updated for support for Mavericks. I would expect that Apple will have an update available at or shortly after the time Mavericks is released if not before, but we'll have to wait for Apple to make further announcements.
    Regards.

  • Does Mavericks add support for 10 bit per channel capable monitors

    Just bought a HP Dreamcolor z27X monitor and have a new Mac Pro 6,1 and would like to know if my workstation supports the full capabilities of the monitor I just purchased.

    JonB8305 wrote:
    10.9.3 still doesn't add the 10 bit support.
    That 'is a strong inhalation of breath' (forum will not allow s..ks). I have to say Apple are falling way behind in terms of supporting current media standards.
    Not ony has 10bit video been around for quite some time now and is something used and supported in Adobe products in the Windows world, but Apple have also failed to support HD audio standards as used in Blu-Ray as an example and also look like failing to support H.265 as will be used for 4K video. (H.265 is twice as efficient as H.264 making it far more practical for the much bigger bandwidth requirements of 4K video.)
    Now in the case of HD audio and H.265 it might be that there is no justification from a playback point of view from Apple's perspective, but what Apple appear to have forgotten is that Mac used to be the first choice for creating media files and if Apple don't support these standards then Macs can no longer be viewed as being suitable for media creation. Therefore this is a huge own goal on Apple's part as content creators would be precisely those people looking to buy new Mac Pro systems and Apple have at least designed the hardware to support 4K editing even if their software is increasingly too feeble to support the required standards.
    Note: I have previously submitted an enhancement request to Apple regarding 10bit video support, and also H.265 support, both prior to Mavericks being released.
    I have no problem with Apple not supporting Blu-Ray playback in the form of providing themselves a Blu-Ray player. However as above I feel they should make the Mac or more accurately OS X able to utilise the same formats as this will allow both content creation tools, and also the possibility for a third-party Blu-Ray player that supports HD audio formats. It is apparently possible for a Mac running Windows in Boot Camp to play these HD audio formats which makes sense since Macs use pretty much the same hardware as 'real' PCs so it is just OS X that is the problem. In fact the way things are going even Linux is moving ahead of OS X in terms of media format support.

  • Mavericks support for express 34 cards?

    What is  Mavericks support for express 34 cards?

    yes, you can install the usb 3.0 driver using Multibeast 6.3.1
    when you are in the application,
    go to the Drivers tab, click Misc
    tick the USB 3.0 Universal
    then go to the Build tab, click install!

  • MST Support for MacBook Pro Retina Late 2013 - DisplayPort 1.2 - Will it ever happen? (with sources)

    So back in October, I purchased a brand new Macbook Pro Retina (MBPr), fully loaded with top of the line specs.  I was soooo excited to have Thunderbolt 2 tech which Intel AND Apple describes as having DisplayPort 1.2a compatibility - which up to this point is unfortunately NOT the case.  The point of the information/questions and requests in this article is to engage a conversation about the issues of not having MST support after Apple falsely mislead their consumers to think otherwise - especially when it is clear the MBPr is capable.  Please read on...
    Apple advertises that the Thunderbolt 2 ports on BOTH the MBPr and the new Mac Pro (NMP) will have 4K Display support with the famed 20gb/sec Ports (DisplayPort 1.2 only requires a little above 17gb/sec).  Now that the 10.9.1 update has been released, we have failed to see MST or Multi-Stream Transport enabled on the MBPr Late 2013.  Now, as for the New Mac Pro- it DOES have MST enabled in 10.9.1 with the AMD GPUs.  For all of you out there that's questioning what this means, short answer is basically the Mac Pro will be able to power a 4K Monitor at 60Hz through the Thunderbolt 2 Port but the New MBPr is stuck with only HDMI 1.4 support which tops out at 4K 30Hz. 30Hz is unacceptable for anything but movies or a photo slideshow.  At 30Hz the cursor will jump across the screen, eliminating any of the benefits of 4K.
    BUT it gets worse...
    Apple can be seen advertising that the new MBPr 15" model can power a 4K monitor THROUGH the Thunderbolt 2 Port here: http://www.apple.com/thunderbolt - This article quotes the following:
    "Now with Thunderbolt 2 built into the new Mac Pro and MacBook Pro with Retina display, you can connect the latest 4K desktop displays and get double the bandwidth for your peripherals. And the two generations of Thunderbolt technology are compatible with each other."
    Does this not let the consumer assume that the newest MBPr will be able to drive a 4K display through the Thunderbolt 2 Port?  I would say yes it does, but at the time I wrote this, the TB2 Ports can't power a 4K display because, as previously stated, MST is disabled in Mavericks for the 15" MBPr Late 2013.
    NOW, later on Apple posted the following article on 4K support here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6008
    4K support on the MacBook Pro (Retina, Late 2013)
    MacBook Pro supports 4K displays and Ultra HD TVs at the following resolutions and refresh rates with the built-in HDMI port:
    3840 x 2160 at 30 Hz refresh rate
    4096 x 2160 at 24 Hz refresh rate (mirroring is not supported at this resolution)
    In the article above the New Mac Pro is listed as having support for a 4K Display with the Thunderbolt 2 Port (or MST DisplayPort 1.2a Technology) at 60Hz with no problem.  This leads myself and many others to believe that MST will NEVER be enabled on the newest MacBook Pro Retina with Nvidia GPUs. Yes, 4K IS supported but ONLY through the HDMI 1.4 port, which has the limitation of only 30hz.  This two-faced advertising is extremely upsetting to a LOT of people, including myself.
    Interestingly enough, THIS IS NOT a hardware issue.  If one ventures into Windows 8.1 via Bootcamp and connects a 4K Display via the Thunderbolt 2 (or through DP1.2) Port, the Display registers at 60Hz, thus proving that the Thundberbolt 2 Hub Controller is completely capable of MST DisplayPort functionality.  Clearly this a driver issue with Apple, Nvidia or Intel or any combination.  What Apple has done here is forcing any professional that desires stable and clear 4K technology through their MacBook Pro Retina to do so only using Windows 8.1 on their own machines!  Definitely an oxymoron if you ask me...
    Later on when the Mac Pro was ready for ordering, Apple placed the Sharp PN-K321 as a compatible option for a 4K Display.  On the Store page featuring the (over three thousand dollar) Sharp 4K display, located here http://store.apple.com/us/product/HD971LL/A/sharp-32-pn-k321-4k-ultra-hd-led-mon itor?fnode=53 Apple states the following:
    "Note that 4K DisplayPort operation is only compatible with the new Mac Pro (Late 2013)."
    All of that being said, and I'm terribly sorry for my wordy ranting...
    This brings me to a final two requests to ANYONE reading this post:
    a) Has anyone working with the new 10.9.2 Beta Update seen evidence that DisplayPort 1.2 capabilities will be enabled for the new MacBook Pro Retina (Nvidia 750M) with the promised "Graphics Driver Updates" within the next Mavericks update?
    and
    b) To others that purchased or were/are thinking of purchasing a new MacBook Pro Retina with TB2 Ports: If you are just as upset as me about this crushing blow to consumers that just purchased a $3,000 laptop that were promised something that wasn't delivered - I urge you please, write to Apple and let them know they are making a mistake.  You can do this though the support page or through http://www.apple.com/feedback
    Thank you for your precious time, and if anyone has anything to contribute to this issue, please jump in....

    GOOD NEWS!
    The Mavericks 10.9.3 update adds official support for Thunderbolt 2, 4K!
    I'm not sure if you will be able to daisy chain anything to the 4K display.  I've read that the design of Thunderbolt 2 includes support for DisplayPort 1.2 multi-stream (MST), which allows this type of daisy chaining with 4K, but we don't know if Apple has this supported on it's machines.  Apparently it's been buggy in development because the graphics driver needs to work correctly with the Thunderbolt 2 host controller.  I'm sure they will work it out if they haven't already.
    The above is all via found information on this topic, but you can follow some more discussion here:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1713876
    One more note on Thunderbolt worth sharing: always keep your fastest peripherals closer to the computer in the chain. If you have a TB1 device directly connected to the computer, anything further down the chain will be limited to TB1 speed/capability regardless of it's native speed.  Always connect TB2 devices first, and save anything TB1 for the end of the chain.

  • Also I need ndiswrapper support for solaris 10

    I have a linksys -G type router and my computer uses a Linksys Wireless-G PCI Adapter with SpeedBooster
    which works in Linux like mandrake , debian systems like knoppix and kanotix but their are some buggy like debian also that don't let me change the essid in debian but most linux works with the drivers for my card which are
    04/13/2004 10:01 AM 7,870 BCM43XX.CAT
    03/31/2004 08:44 AM 11,960 BCMWL5.INF
    02/19/2004 11:51 AM 300,928 BCMWL5.SYS
    normally you install the drivers with ndiswrapper -i BCMWL5.INF then use -m to add it too the model loader program in linux which adds wlan0 to ifconfig and iwconfig programs
    which also ndiswrapper requires the source code of the kernel to install the ndiswrapper right , it req. it too compile the drivers, and using the linux gui programs to setup essid and key wep info
    also I use a script in kanotix to use /etc/network/interfaces to load the info on bootup etc.. to get my wireless network card up in linux.
    also how the support for soundblaster sound cards in solaris 10, I have not fingured out if theirs sound yet. freebsd 5.4 seemed to be missing the sound support
    one more thing in bootup of the install program for Solaris 10 my geforce 6800 card detected right but my tv output was all wrong in since the picture , was only on the monitor and tv had stange graphics on it which did not look right I hope nvidia drivers fix this problem , Is their any different command needed for clone mode in Solaris 10 then free86 nd xorg scripts use?

    I got the solutiion from Canon Customer Serivce, temporary until the 10.10 download is released.  It works:
    "You can download the latest software updates at this address:
    http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/support/professional/professional_cameras/eos_digital_slr_cameras/eos_...
    Please select "OS X Mavericks v10.9" using the drop-down menu on the page.  You have to pick the previous version of Mac OS, because the options for OS X 10.10 Yosemite have not yet been populated.  I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may cause.  After selecting OS X 10.9, please click on the red triangle next to the word "Software" to see the software updates available for your computer.  I would recommend updating all of your software including EOS Utility and Digital Photo Professional."
    I never did find the drop-down menu, but I went into the site map and found what I needed.
    Barry

  • Does the eBooks created by iBooks Author support for iphone now?

    I have been read some blogs discussing that the iPhone could gain new support for ebooks made by iBooks Author. And now, I wanna know whether the prediction is true or not. I can' t find any annoucement from Apple to confirm this point. Does anyone answer my confusion.

    With the current software ..books created using iBooks Author cannot be viewed on iPhones.
    iBooks Author creates books that can only...be used with iPads and on Macs with Mavericks installed, by using iBooks.
    Thats it...no rumours. Blogs or to be more accurate...some of those who  contribute to them seem to either be totally stupid, or like to make themselves look as if they have inside knowledge.
    Apple created iBooks Author to allow self publishers create and publish books to the store. But not just novels or text only type books. iBA made these books allow audio / video ..and much much more than any novel. That being so....most interactive multi media books will not really display well on a screen the size if the iPhone.
    Apple are more concerned in getting iPads in use more by business and education at all levels.
    The only rumour that may well become fact is a larger sized screen for a bigger iPad  mid to late 2014.

  • Last Compatible Version Of iMovie For OS X Mavericks

    Hey everyone,
    I still using Mavericks as many do, I done a clean install and would like to download latest version of iMovie instead recover from my time machine one(imvid version 10.0.5), I want to know what is the latest version for mavericks so I didn't mis any features.
    I tried to download in my purchase page, but it said do you want to download last compatible version, then I choose yes, I not sure what version it download but look like the new one for os x yosemite because from the new "jelly" like icon of iMovie. But does Mavericks support that? or maybe the first version?
    and does mavericks iMovie support sony xavc s code?
    Many thanks!!!

    "what is the latest version for mavericks"     iMovie 10.0.5 is the latest version supported by Mavericks.
    does mavericks iMovie support sony xavc s code?   No.  support for sony xavc s was introduced into the latest version, 10.0.7, which requires Yosemite - see this article:
    http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/03/09/imovie-for-os-x-gets-support-for-photo s-beta-in-latest-update
    Geoff.

  • Is my MacBook Pro (Early 2011) ready for OS X Mavericks?

        Hello,
         I was wondering if someone could help me out with this problem. When I first read about this new system software and I was eager to download it, but I have been reading a lot of reviews of it and I became quite indecisive about if I should download it or not.
         My MacBook Pro is from early 2011 and it´s software is the Mac OS X 10.6.8. I read about many people having different problems with Mavericks, and as my laptop isn´t the latest model I´m not sure if it can function properly with such advanced technology. I really want to have this new software, but I was hoping someone here would tell me if I will risk my MacBook Pro at any rate. 
         Thanks for your help and time.

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    OS X Mavericks is an improvement of OS X Mountain Lion and works properly for most people. People who have problems with Mavericks often use unsupported apps or had a "failed" upgrade (sometimes it is better to format the hard drive and install OS X again than upgrading).
    I have got a Late 2009 iMac which is running OS X Mavericks, and it works correctly. However, as you are not sure, I do not recommend you to upgrade. If you want, you can stay with Mac OS X Snow Leopard and upgrade to the next OS X version released by Apple instead of taking risks.
    In case you want to upgrade, make a backup of your files with Time Machine on an external drive and check that your apps are compatible > http://www.roaringapps.com With this, you can upgrade without worrying about any problem, because you will not lose anything if you have to reinstall OS X.

  • Is keynote just for os x mavericks?

    Is keynote just for os x mavericks? I want to uninstall os x mavericks, but I don't know can I have it again or not?

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    If you got Keynote from the Mac App Store and you have got the most recent version, you should know that it only works with OS X Mavericks, so you will not be able to download Keynote after downgrading. Also, before downgrading, convert your Keynote documents to Keynote '09 documents (open the files with Keynote and go to File menu -in the menu bar- > Export to > Keynote '09).
    However, note that older Keynote versions work with older OS X versions. After downgrading, you will need a iWork '09 DVD to reinstall Keynote (you can get it at Amazon). Then, open  > Software Update, and install the latest Keynote '09 version.

  • HT6055 Request to Apple: restore support for older codecs

    I used Quicktime extensively for my research before upgrading to Mavericks, and now that these older codecs have been removed, none of my experimental videos taken over the past 5 years will play in Quicktime. This is extremely disappointing.
    I'd like to gather as much user support as possible to request that Apple restore support for these older codecs.
    PLEASE RESPOND ON THIS THREAD BY ADDING YOUR REQUEST FOR APPLE TO RESTORE SUPPORT FOR OLDER CODECS.
    FYI, my video files were .avi format, recorded by a Nikon D300s and a Zeiss EVO 55 scanning electron microscope.

    Some things can be converted without transforming the data.  I have data in Excel spreadsheets that is identical to the data in the Lotus Symphony spreadsheets in which I entered the data in 1986.  Converting video does involve data transformation which is undesirable unless it comes to a point where it is unavoidable. Speaking as a research scientist, one is obligated to try to preserve original data to a reasonable extent.  In this case the video is not "dead".  It can still be played.  It's just Apple's behavior that anything older than about 4 years is old-fashioned and to be forgotten that's mandating stepping outside Apple software to do so.  Yes, it would be a good idea to convert so when future upgrades mean no old codecs will play at least the data are available to some degree.  I still would not get rid of the old files since they are the original data, and if the person spends 30 seconds installing VLC player they can still view the original data for another 10 years at least (if they keep the computer that long -- my computer is 12 years old and I can still run applications on it dating from the early 1990s).
    By the way, you can still buy VHS players.  I agree they will not be around forever, and if it's a family video you want to play 20 years from now then you may as well convert it now, but then that's not research evidence.
    Optical media are dead at Apple, but still extensively used outside Apple.  I agree in 20 years it will be hard to find a DVD player but visit right now any store selling movies or music, or a public library, and optical media are still around.  Apple can force the issue where their hardware is involved, especially as regards to installing Apple software, and of course by pushing online media sales (if you buy from the iTunes Store, which I don't).

Maybe you are looking for