Passing Item Number as a Parameter takes long time,need to make it optional

Hi,
I am trying to pass Inventory Item as a parameter in the discoverer report and it is taking long time to query the results. I am not sure how to make a parameter optional (Not Required)
Please advice
Thanks,
user12048986
Edited by: user12048986 on Apr 19, 2010 2:54 PM

Hi
In order to use the value ALL in a list of values you have to do two things. These are:
1. Create the LOV like you did with a SELECT 'ALL' FROM DUAL unioned to the real LOV
2. Create a condition that looks for the word ALL
Here's the condition:
COLUMN_VALUE = :Parameter_Value OR :Parameter_Value = 'ALL'
You could also make sure the value is in uppercase using this:
COLUMN_VALUE = :Parameter_Value OR UPPER(:Parameter_Value) = 'ALL'
This way if a user keyed 'all' it would still work.
Best wishes
Michael

Similar Messages

It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report

Hi,
It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report. What could cause this? How to troubleshoot the behavior of the report? Could I use Profile and what events should i select?
Thanks

Hi jori5,
Based on my understanding, after changing the parameter, the report render very slow, right?
In Reporting Service, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, please
refer to this article:
More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
In your scenario, since you mention the query spends less time, the delay might happens during report processing and report rendering section. So you should check Executionlog3 to check which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article
to optimize your report:
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Qiuyun Yu

Full GC takes long time

Hello,
Since the last two weeks, we're experiencing Full GCs that take long time and block our application.
Our platform is:
Windows 2003 Server 64 bit
Tomcat 6.0.18
Java 1.6.0_u13.
Total memory: 8Gb.
-Xms4096m
-Xmx6144m
-Xss256k
Old generation: min 2,66Gb max 4,0G
Eden generation: min 1,5Gb max 2,0G
Perm generation: min 57Mb max 84Mb
Here a piece of our gc.log:
21601.266: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2009225K->6206K(1942528K)] 3913618K->1913365K(4738752K), 0.0992347 secs] [Times: user=0.16 sys=0.03, real=0.11 secs]
21611.268: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1942485K->5485K(1879040K)] 3849645K->1914490K(4675264K), 0.0986129 secs] [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.00, real=0.11 secs]
21618.350: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1879021K->12392K(2060928K)] 3788026K->1930794K(4857152K), 0.2036000 secs] [Times: user=0.14 sys=0.02, real=0.20 secs]
21624.869: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1935116K->8545K(2065600K)] 3853519K->1930702K(4861824K), 0.0924182 secs] [Times: user=0.05 sys=0.00, real=0.09 secs]
21624.961: [Full GC (System) [PSYoungGen: 8545K->0K(2065600K)] [PSOldGen: 1922156K->635750K(2796224K)] 1930702K->635750K(4861824K) [PSPermGen: 38643K->38643K(60992K)], 1.3719842 secs] [Times: user=1.09 sys=0.00, real=1.36 secs]
21634.887: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2048500K->10395K(2078912K)] 2684250K->646145K(4875136K), 0.0180670 secs] [Times: user=0.02 sys=0.05, real=0.01 secs]
21645.165: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2074007K->8120K(2003392K)] 2709758K->648930K(4799616K), 0.0176943 secs] [Times: user=0.08 sys=0.00, real=0.03 secs]
25209.938: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1760190K->7344K(1707072K)] 4127764K->2376892K(4503296K), 0.0760053 secs] [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.03, real=0.06 secs]
25218.120: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1707056K->10511K(1657728K)] 4076604K->2382964K(4453952K), 0.0704081 secs] [Times: user=0.13 sys=0.00, real=0.08 secs]
25221.680: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1657679K->5731K(1982400K)] 4030132K->2385544K(4778624K), 0.0985384 secs] [Times: user=0.20 sys=0.00, real=0.09 secs]
25226.968: [GC [PSYoungGen: 993426K->6083K(1982784K)] 3373239K->2389543K(4779008K), 0.5147901 secs] [Times: user=0.08 sys=0.00, real=0.52 secs]
25227.483: [Full GC (System) [PSYoungGen: 6083K->0K(1982784K)] [PSOldGen: 2383460K->536034K(2796224K)] 2389543K->536034K(4779008K) [PSPermGen: 39765K->38756K(58816K)], 155.4030025 secs] [Times: user=1.34 sys=0.64, real=155.39 secs]
25389.833: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1976624K->12915K(2023616K)] 2512658K->566671K(4819840K), 13.1263397 secs] [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.03, real=13.13 secs]
25405.871: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2023579K->13857K(2031552K)] 2577335K->583736K(4827776K), 3.5796784 secs] [Times: user=0.03 sys=0.00, real=3.58 secs]
25416.490: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2024544K->9059K(2074944K)] 2594423K->587581K(4871168K), 0.1184355 secs] [Times: user=0.06 sys=0.00, real=0.13 secs]
25425.393: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2064144K->7415K(2075456K)] 2642665K->590222K(4871680K), 0.0441002 secs] [Times: user=0.02 sys=0.00, real=0.05 secs]
25438.547: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2062519K->8857K(2075264K)] 2645326K->594735K(4871488K), 0.0301620 secs] [Times: user=0.01 sys=0.00, real=0.03 secs]
The minor collections go perfect.
The first full GC in this piece of log takes 1,36s, and the old generation passes from 1922156K->635750K
But the second full GC (1 hour later) blocks the server for 155.39s, and the old generation pases from 2383460K->536034K
The server load between execution of full GC was similar. Any differences I saw in this two moments:
first full gc: number of Tomcat http threads : 230. The full gc provokes that Tomcat start new threads until get 500 (maxThreads)
second full gc: number of Tomcat http threads : 500.
I'm not an expert in tunning jvm. If somebody could help me, these pauses are killing the app and it's unacceptable for my client (for 2 min. the app does not work).
If you need more information (threads stack, histograms, ... I have ...)
Maybe I need to reduce the size of the old generation? Or change the garbage collector for old generation? The server cpu is going well, I prefer to consume more cpu in gc and avoid this pauses.
Any help will be very very appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Joan.

Hello,
Sorry for my continuous replies. Another full gc has occurred. This is the trace:
262631.531: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2071685K->10889K(2078464K)] 4711353K->2652961K(4874688K), 0.3392037 secs] [Times: user=0.08 sys=0.00, real=0.34 secs]
262640.608: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2071978K->11055K(2078784K)] 4714051K->2656136K(4875008K), 1.3267436 secs] [Times: user=0.06 sys=0.00, real=1.33 secs]
262649.880: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2072165K->17337K(2071872K)] 4717246K->2669454K(4868096K), 3.0493937 secs] [Times: user=0.16 sys=0.00, real=3.05 secs]
262658.069: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2071865K->14678K(2075840K)] 4723982K->2676078K(4872064K), 5.4598301 secs] [Times: user=0.08 sys=0.03, real=5.45 secs]
262666.592: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2069183K->15835K(2075776K)] 4730583K->2682691K(4872000K), 1.6894894 secs] [Times: user=0.11 sys=0.05, real=1.70 secs]
262673.352: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2070620K->14122K(2068992K)] 4737476K->2687230K(4865216K), 2.9711981 secs] [Times: user=0.06 sys=0.03, real=2.97 secs]
262682.891: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2068909K->10709K(2075712K)] 4742017K->2686673K(4871936K), 1.1160323 secs] [Times: user=0.19 sys=0.00, real=1.13 secs]
262691.733: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2065941K->10683K(2075584K)] 4741905K->2689212K(4871808K), 1.4898942 secs] [Times: user=0.05 sys=0.00, real=1.50 secs]
262701.512: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2065888K->9341K(2076480K)] 4744418K->2690073K(4872704K), 1.3835846 secs] [Times: user=0.13 sys=0.00, real=1.39 secs]
262709.896: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2065601K->10718K(2076480K)] 4746334K->2693212K(4872704K), 0.7815897 secs] [Times: user=0.05 sys=0.01, real=0.78 secs]
262718.681: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2067028K->10199K(2076672K)] 4749523K->2695508K(4872896K), 1.2951014 secs] [Times: user=0.06 sys=0.00, real=1.30 secs]
262727.940: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2067345K->10112K(2076608K)] 4752654K->2698129K(4872832K), 1.6785345 secs] [Times: user=0.08 sys=0.00, real=1.69 secs]
262736.092: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2067264K->10886K(2077184K)] 4755281K->2702237K(4873408K), 1.1985764 secs] [Times: user=0.06 sys=0.02, real=1.20 secs]
262744.626: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2069382K->11366K(2077248K)] 4760733K->2705795K(4873472K), 1.4323653 secs] [Times: user=0.13 sys=0.00, real=1.44 secs]
262754.913: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2069912K->11945K(2077824K)] 4764342K->2708689K(4874048K), 0.8340946 secs] [Times: user=0.03 sys=0.00, real=0.84 secs]
262765.038: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2072283K->11669K(2077888K)] 4769028K->2711204K(4874112K), 1.3040060 secs] [Times: user=0.09 sys=0.02, real=1.31 secs]
262776.885: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2072021K->9940K(2079360K)] 4771556K->2711919K(4875584K), 0.8646772 secs] [Times: user=0.09 sys=0.00, real=0.88 secs]
262783.713: [GC [PSYoungGen: 1173115K->8659K(2079168K)] 3875094K->2713127K(4875392K), 1.4434465 secs] [Times: user=0.09 sys=0.00, real=1.45 secs]
262785.157: [Full GC (System) [PSYoungGen: 8659K->0K(2079168K)] [PSOldGen: 2704467K->655075K(2796224K)] 2713127K->655075K(4875392K) [PSPermGen: 41376K->40988K(42048K)], 132.6088125 secs] [Times: user=1.47 sys=0.39, real=132.58 secs]
262925.100: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2062280K->16892K(2068992K)] 2717355K->683188K(4865216K), 8.9491611 secs] [Times: user=0.13 sys=0.00, real=8.94 secs]
262971.183: [GC [PSYoungGen: 2068978K->8052K(2074624K)] 2735273K->692990K(4870848K), 7.7833800 secs]
When a "bad" full GC occurs, I can see that just before it the minor collections start to perform bad. Normal values for minor collections are 0,0x seconds, and before a "bad" full GC these minor collections take seconds (1, 2, ... up to 5 seconds).
I can show an histogram of the first 25 entries before and after the full GC:
BEFORE
num #instances #bytes class name
1: 226135 718455272 [I
2: 1905686 637239584 [C
3: 122775 621626112 [B
4: 8218 538714736 [Lcom.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.objects.XObject;
5: 160974 445403288 [Ljava.lang.Object;
6: 1759928 70397120 java.lang.String
7: 334672 42838016 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredElementNSImpl
8: 103592 42699248 [[I
9: 227966 41945744 java.net.SocksSocketImpl
10: 629974 35278544 com.vpfw.proxy.cache.data.B
11: 636515 30552720 java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$HashEntry
12: 555354 26656992 java.util.HashMap$Entry
13: 89059 18034280 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry;
14: 230432 16591104 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredTextImpl
15: 225401 14425664 java.lang.ref.Finalizer
16: 222588 14245632 java.net.SocketInputStream
17: 334644 13385760 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.AttributeMap
18: 386837 12378784 java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue$Node
19: 40226 11263504 [[Ljava.lang.Object;
20: 21646 11246112 [Ljava.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$HashEntry;
21: 684613 10953808 java.lang.Object
22: 227958 9118320 java.net.Socket
23: 218591 8743640 java.net.Inet4Address
24: 57810 8730528 <constMethodKlass>
25: 230658 7381056 java.io.FileDescriptor
AFTER
num #instances #bytes class name
1: 91917 650028776 [B
2: 1767088 612264368 [C
3: 176313 581838552 [I
4: 141278 322132688 [Ljava.lang.Object;
5: 1762956 70518240 java.lang.String
6: 367122 46991616 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredElementNSImpl
7: 239506 44069104 java.net.SocksSocketImpl
8: 633882 35497392 com.vpfw.proxy.cache.data.B
9: 639797 30710256 java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$HashEntry
10: 606366 29105568 java.util.HashMap$Entry
11: 72730 20521256 [[I
12: 89136 18497696 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry;
13: 252946 18212112 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.DeferredTextImpl
14: 236339 15125696 java.lang.ref.Finalizer
15: 233891 14969024 java.net.SocketInputStream
16: 366906 14676240 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.AttributeMap
17: 429913 13757216 java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue$Node
18: 43319 12129544 [[Ljava.lang.Object;
19: 719233 11507728 java.lang.Object
20: 21649 11246408 [Ljava.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$HashEntry;
21: 239498 9579920 java.net.Socket
22: 143 9317736 [Lcom.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.objects.XObject;
23: 229531 9181240 java.net.Inet4Address
24: 57817 8735944 <constMethodKlass>
25: 242443 7758176 java.io.FileDescriptor
The big differencies is the "com.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.objects.XObject;".
Before and after, the values are:
4: 8218 538714736 [Lcom.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.objects.XObject;
22: 143 9317736 [Lcom.sun.org.apache.xpath.internal.objects.XObject;
Could this the cause of the full GC that takes long time?
Thanks,
Joan.

Miro execution takes long time

Hi Experts,
While posting Credit memo for Purchase returns in MIRO, processing takes long time, it takes hours to complete entire posting.
For each inputs say while entering PO number, selecting tax code, selecting 'calculate tax' checkbox it takes minimum 10-15 mins for each to process.
I processed with following parameters.
PO contains 10 line items.
Tax code : C2(ED(1021)+VAT 5%)
Indicator: Goods Items/Delivery Costs/Both.
Version: EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01
Please advice to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Sathish

Hello Sathish,
this looks very strange. I guess you have some bad performing user exit inside. Otherwise MIRO should not perform that bad for the document with 10 items.
If you don't want to create an SAP message for that, you can try tracing an execution with ST12 transaction (more details here: http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/SingleTransactionAnalysis
Regards,
Yuri

What could be the reason for Crawl process to take long time or get in to a hung state.

Hi All,
What could be the reason for Crawl process to take long time or get in to a hung state? Is it something also related to the DB Server resources crunch? Does this lead to Index file corruption?
What should be the process to be followed when index file is corrupted? How do we come to know about that?
Thanks in Advance.

"The crawl time depends on what you are crawling -- the number of items, the size of the items, the location of the items. If you have a lot of content that needs to be crawled, it will take much time".
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f4cad578-f3bc-4822-b660-47ad27ce094a/sharepoint-2007-crawl-taking-long-time-to-complete?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
"The only clean and recommended way to recover from an index corruption is to completely rebuild the index on all the servers in the farm."
http://blogs.technet.com/b/victorbutuza/archive/2008/11/11/event-id-4138-an-index-corruption-was-detected-in-component-shadowmerge-in-catalog-portal-content.aspx
Whenever search index file got corrupted it will got the details to Event logs
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff468695%28v=office.14%29.aspx
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

BPM Process chain takes long time to process

We have BI7, Netweaver 2004s on Oracle and SUN Solaris
There is a process chain (BPM) which pulls data from the CRM system into BW. The scheduled time to run this chain is 0034 hrs. This chain should ideally complete before / around 0830 Hrs. <b>Now the problem is that every alternate day this chain behaves normally and gets completed well before 0830 hrs but every alternate day this chain fails</b> there are almost 40 chains running daily. Some are event triggered (dependent with each other) or some run in parallel. In this, (BPM) process chain, usually there are 5 requests with 3 Delta and 2 full uploads (Master Data). The delta uploads finishes in 30 minutes without any issues with very few record transfers. The first full upload is from 0034 hrs to approximately 0130 hrs and the 2nd upload is from 0130 hrs to 0230 hrs. Now if the 1st upload gets delayed then the people who are initiating these chains, stop the 2nd full upload and continue it after all the process chains are completed. Now this entire BPM process chain sometimes takes 17 -18 hrs to complete!!!!!
No other loads in CRM or BW when these process chains are running
CRM has background jobs to push IDOCS to BW which run every 2 minutes which runs successfully
Yesterday this chain got completed successfully (well within stipulated time) with over 33,00,000 records transferred but sometimes it has failed to transfer even 12,00,000 records!!
Attaching a zip file, please refer the 21 to 26 Analysis screen shot.doc from the zip file
Within the zip file, attaching Normal timings of daily process chains.xls the name explains it.
Also within the zip file refer BPM Infoprovider and data source screen shot.doc please refer this file as the infopackage (page 2) which was used in the process chain is not displayed later on in page number 6 BUT CHAIN GOT SUCESSFULLY COMPLETED
We have analyzed:--
1)     The PSA data for BPM process chain for past few days
2)     The info providers for BPM process chain for past few days
3)     The ODS entries for BPM process chain for past few days
4)     The point of failure of BPM process chain for past few days
5)     The overall performance of all the process chains for past few days
6)     The number of requests in BW for this process chain
7)     The load on CRM system for past few days when this process chain ran on BW system
As per our analysis, there are couple of things which can be fixed in the BW system:--
1)     The partner agreement (transaction WE20) defined for the partner LS/BP3CLNT475 mentions both message types RSSEND and RSINFO: -- collect IDOCs and pack size = 1 Since the pack size = 1 will generate 1 TRFC call per IDOC, it should be changed to 10 so that less number of TRFCs will be generated thus less overhead for the BW server resulting in the increase in performance
2)     In the definition of destination for the concerned RFC in BW (SM59), the Technical Setting tab says the Load balancing option = No. We are planning to make it Yes
But we believe that though these changes will bring some increase in performance, this is not the root cause of the abnormal behavior of this chain as this chain runs successfully on every alternate day with approximately the same amount of load in it.
I was not able to attach the many screen shots or the info which I had gathered during my analysis. Please advice how do I attach these files
Best Regards,

Hi,
Normally index creation or deletion can take long time in case your database statistics are not updated properly, so can check stat after your data loading is completed and index generation is done, Do creation of database statistics.
Then try to recheck ...
Regards,
Satya

The Application Takes long time to Start

Hello All,
We ar eon Unix->64 Bit-> Essbase 11.1.1.3.
Problem Description : The application is taking long to start up. around 5 to 6 minutes. This is very first time it is happening.
There were no specific changes done to the application in the recent releases.
I have tried all options 1. Compacating outline, 2. Purging the application log etc. all other applications respond good on this host except this. Usually any application should not take more than 1 to 2 minutes to start up.
There are no specific errors or XCP files recorded in the logs and folders.
Appreciate your suggestions
MS

Thanks Jitendra and Prabhas,
I know i have posted this thread sometime back and later I had to jump on a New release, so did not get time to check your inputs.
Well I am back on this issue again. I have been working on various option to get this issues solved " start of App takes long time"
Here are some Details. We are on SunOs 64 Bit, has 12CU with dual core, with Essbase 11.1.1.3 running on it. This is an ASO application and has just 7 dimensions, Out of which the ORGANIZATION Dimension is pretty huge with Multiple Hierarchies enabled ( Both Stored and Dynamic ) and has more than 20,00,000 members including the alternate hierarchies ( Shared members)
I did a smoke test by building dimension by dimension the app was startiung up in just *40* seconds. and when i reached the ORG dimension and added more than 70,000 memebrs . there i fall sick. the app now gets back to its old issue ( Takes more than 10 mainutes to start).
CPU Usage ranges between 3.1 % to 4 %
PID USER NLWP PRI NI VSZ RSS S STIME ELAPSED %CPU COMMAND
4424 user1 1 59 20 1608 1032 S 18:13:33 00:00 0.0 grep COMMAND
4428 user1 1 59 20 1608 1032 S 18:13:33 00:00 0.0 grep ESS
4766 user1 88 55 20 6814168 5684200 O 17:37:48 35:45 3.1 /path/xyz/masked/ASO_APP hgfedc NOCREAT.
But My question here is, in the last moth cube i still similar number of members in the cube and nothing really had changed.
Essbase GURU's Please give me some Hint to think out of box now.
Thanks
MS

Takes Long time for Data Loading.

Hi All,
Good Morning.. I am new to SDN.
Currently i am using the datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H and it contains 225 fields. Currently i am using around 40 fields in my report.
Can i hide the remaining fields in the datasource level itself (TCODE : RSA6)
Currently data loading takes more time to load the data from PSA to ODS (ODS 1).
And also right now i am pulling some data from another ODS(ODS 2)(LookUP). It takes long time to update the data in Active data table of the ODS.
Can you please suggest how to improve the performance of dataloading on this Case.
Thanks & Regards,
Siva.

Hi....
Yes...u can hide..........just Check the hide box for those fields.......R u in BI 7.0 or BW...........whatever ........is the no of records is huge?
If so u can split the records and execute............I mean use the same IP...........just execute it with different selections.........
Check in ST04............is there are any locks or lockwaits..........if so...........Go to SM37 >> Check whether any Long running job is there or not.........then check whether that job is progressing or not............double click on the Job >> From the Job details copy the PID..............go to ST04 .....expand the node............and check whether u r able to find that PID there or not.........
Also check System log in SM21............and shortdumps in ST04........
Now to improve performance...........u can try to increase the virtual memory or servers.........if possiblr........it will increase the number of work process..........since if many jobs run at a time .then there will be no free Work prrocesses to proceed........
Regards,
Debjani......

The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

Hi experts,
The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
I have checked the note 382329,
-> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
-> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
   PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
Please suggest.

The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
Thanks Hope this helps ..

Message Mapping takes long time to save and activate

I have one problem in my present interface...
the message structure is large and when mappping is over and I click save button it will take long time for activation..
should I change any parameter in admin? or is it bcos of java web start version?
need help
- Teja

Hi
Can you share the Version History of the Component?
Regards
Pothana

Payables Account Analysis report takes long time to produce xml output

Hi,
I am trying to get xml data for the Payables Account Analysis report. I have changed the output format of the concurrent program to XML.
The report takes long time to produce the xml data irrespective of the number of rows fetched. But the same report with Text output runs very fast.
Any reason why the xml output takes long time?
thanks in advance
Malathi.

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
As mentioned above, i deleted the Q_FLEXDATA and ran the report. it takes less time.
But Will the report data not affected when we delete Q_FLEXDATA Group? and Why this flexdata group affects the running time?
Thanks,
Malathi.

Concurrent report takes long time to complete

Dear all,
Concurrent report "Inactive items report" takes long time to complete.
How to solve this performance issue ?
Kindly offer me solution to this.
Regards,
Arun

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
Was the performance acceptable before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please enable trace and generate the TKPROF to determine why the request takes that long to complete.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Slow+AND+Concurrent&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Slow+AND+Concurrent+AND+TKPROF&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

MDX report rendering takes long time and showing Conflict Message

Hi All,
This is my MDX Query
with member
[Measures].[Rent] as
IIF(IsEmpty([Measures].[Budget]),
NULL, [Measures].[Rent])
select {[Measures].[Rent]}
on columns,
[Property].[Address].[All].children *
DESCENDANTS([Account].[Account Hierarchy].[Account Group].[Expenditures],
[Account].[Account Tree].[Account]) *
[Property].[Property].[All].children
on rows
from
[Master]
When i comment [Property] Dimension member , i am able to get the result, but i need Property Dimension in MDX.
Can anyone give some idea ?
Thanks in advance

Hi Jarugulalaks,
According to your description, it take long time to render the report when using [Property] dimension, right?
In this case, the issue can be caused by that there are too many members under this dimension. In your query, you used CrossJoin function to join multiple dimensions which might cause the performance issue. If you cross-join medium-sized or large-sized sets
(e.g., sets that contain more than 100 items each), you can end up with a result set that contains many thousands of items—enough to seriously impair performance. You can use the NonEmptyCrossjoin function instead of Corssjoin function. For the detail
information, please see:
http://sqlmag.com/data-access/cross-join-performance
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144797.aspx
Besides, the total time to generate a reporting server report can be divided into 3 elements: Time to retrieve the data (TimeDataRetrieval); Time to process the report (TimeProcessing); Time to render the report (TimeRendering). For the detail information,
please refer to the link below to see Charlie's reply.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05/how-to-improve-performance-of-report?forum=sqlanalysisservices#a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

MIRO take long time when enter invoice for PO with GR-based invoice

Hi,
In my client system, system take long time for extracting PO data while booking invoice via. MIRO for the purchase order which have GR-based IV is marked. However system take few second for extracting PO data when enter invoice via. MIRO for the PO which don't have GR-based IV. Please note following point while providing the solution:
- this problem is exist only for the purchase order related to one company code. However system working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence we assuming that some company code level cofiguration is missing.
- the problem is exist for po with account assignment K.
- we have one to one mapping for purchase organization to company code to plant.
Appreciate for you quick respond. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
sp sahu

Hi,
Please check with FI guy for GL A/c and Cost centers which you are using to create the PO with item category K.
Still problem permits check with your ABAP person.
Regards,
Mohd Ali.

One Form 10g takes long time to open

We have created one form using Object Library and all objects are inherited.
It takes long time to open as compared to other forms which are inherited from Object Library.
Anybody having any idea. It would be great if somebody can provide some help

This form contains 3 tabs and one tab is completely inherited from Object Library (the whole block, items etc). I have tried to remove this inherited tab then it works better. So i think its definitely something to do with object library.
Thanks alot.

Passing Item Number as a Parameter takes long time,need to make it optional

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for