Patch 10.1.5 won't run on Acrobat X Standard

I'm trying to apply the latest Acrobat patch, 10.1.5. It installs fine for my Acrobat Pro PCs but will not run on my Acrobat Standard PCs.
When I launch the AcrobatUpd1015.msp, it runs for a few seconds then disappears.
This is what I get in the log:
MSI (s) (EC:B8) [14:11:31:390]: Product: Adobe Acrobat X Standard - Update '{AC76BA86-A440-0000-A440-7A8C400A1015}' could not be installed. Error code 1603. Additional information is available in the log file c:\logs\delme.log.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) [14:11:31:390]: Windows Installer installed an update. Product Name: Adobe Acrobat X Standard. Product Version: 10.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems. Update Name: {AC76BA86-A440-0000-A440-7A8C400A1015}. Installation success or error status: 1603.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) [14:11:31:390]: Product: Adobe Acrobat X Standard -- Installation failed.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) [14:11:31:390]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Adobe Acrobat X Standard. Product Version: 10.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems. Installation success or error status: 1603.
Fatal error during installation.
C:\Windows\Installer\c08dae4.msi
I've tried running the patch from a network share and locally. I've also tried using "IGNOREAAM=1". No luck
Anybody run into this?

Thanks,
My original post contained the full contents of the verbose (uses /l* switch) log file.
Here is everything the log file contained:
MSI (s) (EC:B8) : Product: Adobe Acrobat X Standard - Update '{AC76BA86-A440-0000-A440-7A8C400A1015}' could not be installed. Error code 1603. Additional information is available in the log file c:\logs\delme.log.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) : Windows Installer installed an update. Product Name: Adobe Acrobat X Standard. Product Version: 10.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems. Update Name: {AC76BA86-A440-0000-A440-7A8C400A1015}. Installation success or error status: 1603.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) : Product: Adobe Acrobat X Standard -- Installation failed.
MSI (s) (EC:B8) : Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Adobe Acrobat X Standard. Product Version: 10.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems. Installation success or error status: 1603.
Fatal error during installation.
C:\Windows\Installer\c08dae4.msi
Thanks for any help you can provide. This has been a VERY frustrating problem. I’ve tried manual installs on three different PCs now.
We started at 10.1.3. All Standard PCs ran the 10.1.4 patch but won’t run the 10.1.5 patch.
Acrobat Pro 10.1.4 PCs ran the 10.1.5 patch no problem.
Jim Cassidy | Technical Specialist II, Desktop and Mobile Computing | IT Division | 604.276.5184
WorkSafeBC | www.worksafebc.com<http://www.worksafebc.com

Similar Messages

  • PHP script won't run in the background

    Hi all
    Hope someone can help me with a weird issue I have...
    I am trying to run a php CLI script in the background and it just won't run - it has a status of Stopped SIGTOU (Trying to write output) - Here are the details
    OS
    Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2
    PHP
    PHP 5.3.6 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Sep  8 2011 19:34:00)
    Copyright (c) 1997-2011 The PHP Group
    Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2011 Zend Technologies
    I created a basic script  test.php
    <?php echo 'Hello world'.PHP_EOL; ?>
    Here are the results of various tests:-
    Test 1) php -f test.php  (Hello world gets displayed)
    Test 2) php -f test.php >test.log 2>&1 (Hello world gets put into test.log)
    Test 3) php -f test.php >test.log 2>&1 & --- I get [1]+  Stopped(SIGTTOU)        php -f test.php > test.log 2>&1 -- and the job just sits there doing nothing nothing gets logged however lsof shows the log file is open
    It has to be something to do with Apple's php build because a similar bash shell script gets executed no problems in the background...
    This has me stumped ... any ideas? What can I do to find out what is going on ...?
    TIA
    Rich

    Just realized your trying to load the php files by using the File->Open menu item in the Browser.  That won;t work.
    You have to load the php file by placing it in the Sites folder and entering http://localhost/file.php
    (or if you have user Sites enabled http://localhost/~user/file.php)
    The reason it is grayed out is that the browser doesn't run (or know of) php files. The web server runs those (via php) and the output of the file goes to the web browser.
    This page How to enable Web Sharing in OS X Mountain Lion does a pretty good job of explaining it. (as does the user tip I lonked to before)

  • FrameMaker v7.2p144 won't run on Windows 7

    We have finally swapped out our older machines for new ones that run Windows 7. After reinstalling FrameMaker v7.2 (we have a client who has no interest in upgrading from v7.2), I attempted to install the patches, starting with p144, but it won't run. Might this be a compatibility issue with the newer OS? Regardless, is there a workaround?  Thanks, Monica

    GrammyEmmy wrote:
    We have finally swapped out our older machines for new ones that run Windows 7. After reinstalling FrameMaker v7.2 (we have a client who has no interest in upgrading from v7.2), I attempted to install the patches, starting with p144, but it won't run. Might this be a compatibility issue with the newer OS? Regardless, is there a workaround?  Thanks, Monica
    Windows 7 has a compatibility setting - I'm not sure where to find it, but a Google search should turn it up. You can set it for earlier Windows versions, like XP.
    HTH
    Regards,
    Peter
    Peter Gold
    KnowHow ProServices

  • Old Flash in new Firefox won't run, no warnings.

    Opened my laptop using a current version of FF but with Flash 11.9. Viewed one of my pages with Flash content and.... nothing, just an empty div. No warnings that Flash was out of date, etc. So if I have this right FF won't run out of date Flash for security reasons. Fine. I've always seen warnings in these cases. But apparently if Flash is old enough FF just doesn't bother. Visitors have no idea what is happening. It just looks bad.
    Is this correct? What is the recommended way of dealing with this from a developer's viewpoint?

    We strongly recommend that users always run the latest version of Flash Player.  Running an old version puts users at risk for malware infection.  The vast majority of users are opted in to background update and are kept updated automatically, but there are users that for whatever reason have chosen to stick with an old, vulnerable version of Flash Player.  While this is a bad idea, people are certainly free to do it.  The upside is that the affected population that you're describing is pretty small.
    The upgrade story will actually get better over time.  The latest versions of both Google Chrome and Internet Explorer include Flash Player as a built-in component, distributed with the browser.  Users are always updated with the latest version of Flash, and new updates are delivered inline via the Chrome updater or Windows Update respectively.  Mozilla has spent a few years talking about how Flash needs to go away, while the other browser vendors have been investing in modernized plug-in interfaces and improvements in plug-in security, and unfortunately the prioritization is showing in the user experience.  We're hopeful that Windows 10 will pick up the majority of the WinXP and Vista stragglers as well as many of the Win7 - Win8.1 users, which means that the whole Flash update problem for a very large population of people will be solved in IE once people upgrade.
    It's hard to say what's at the root of the specific issue you're describing.  With the major browsers on 4 or 6 week major update cycles (we publish monthly to ensure we can catch and address any new injections in the browsers that might come up in nightly/beta versions before they hit the general population, and to align with Microsoft patch tuesday), so you're talking something like 18 months worth of changes between the Firefox version you're running and the version of Flash that you're running.  Everything at Mozilla gets done with bugs, and we'd definitely encourage you to file a bug on the user experience that you're seeing.  They've been operating from a reactive place lately, and some of the changes that impact Flash definitely appear to be a little slapdash.  It's ultimately good for them to hear from the developer community and not just me all the time, but feel free to add me to the CC: list in the bug.
    We ultimately have no control over the longevity of a particular build of Flash -- there are way too many external variables -- and we're also investing a huge amount of effort in proactive security work (and it's been our top engineering priority for years).  So each build usually includes large numbers of changes designed to either harden the player or address responsibly disclosed issues from researchers, the larger security and computer science communities and whatever the latest auditing and testing tools we can get our hands on are.  The continuous stream of innovation and ingenuity in the offense space is impressive, but keeps us pretty busy.  Browser-side changes can easily break older versions of the plug-in, and running an old version is just a bad idea.
    So we've really streamlined the installation process to keep people on current versions, and Windows 10 will hopefully be a massive shift away from older, more vulnerable versions of Windows.  The landscape is so different than it was even 4-5 years ago.. the days of running anything for years (or months) in your browser are long gone.  The pace isn't going to slow down anytime soon, either.

  • Latest sapehpi - startehpi won't run - misses parameters???

    Just started with EHP4 on ECC 6.0 and could only download patch-38 of sapehpi which is quite new.
    Problem turns up during first time STARTEHPI and this won't run while complaining about parameters not matching.
    Log for command doesn't really show a lot more but does also complain about an End-Of-File on INSTANCES in QTEMP.
    Couldn't find anything helpful in notes or guides so now hoping on you guys ...
    Statement used is:  STARTEHPI SID(DE1) TYPE(*ABAP) EPIPATH('/usr/sap/DE1/EHPI')
    Not sure if we still need to also use the OPTIONS('-srvarg=/RoleService/off')  but that doesn't make a difference for the problem.
    Any help appreciated, Louis.

    Hi Louis,
    I found the reason for the issue. It is based on the strange system library list the customer is running. There is a name conflict with program STARTUP called by command STARTEHPI. There exists also a foreign one in library SYSIB on the customer system. Please have a look at following analysis details:
    DSPCMD CMD(STARTEHPI):
    ======================
                               Opdrachtgegevens afbeelden                                                                               
    Opdracht . . . . . . . :   STARTEHPI     Bibliotheek  . . . . . :   DE1EHP                                                                               
    Programma dat opdracht verwerkt  . . . :   STARTUP                            
       Bibliotheek  . . . . . . . . . . . . :     *LIBL       <-- !!!                     
       Gebruikte status voor oproepen van                                          
         programma  . . . . . . . . . . . . :     *USER                            
    Bronbestand  . . . . . . . . . . . . . :   QCMDSRC                            
       Bibliotheek  . . . . . . . . . . . . :     GEN720UOPT                       
    Sectie van bronbestand . . . . . . . . :   STARTEHPI                          
    Programma voor geldigheidscontrole . . :   *NONE                              
    Geldige werkstand(en)  . . . . . . . . :   *PROD                              
                                                *DEBUG                             
                                                *SERVICE                           
    Waar verwerking is toegestaan  . . . . :   *IMOD      *BMOD      *IREXX       
                                                *BREXX     *BPGM      *IPGM        
                                                *EXEC      *INTERACT  *BATCH                                                                               
    MEER...     
    Druk op Enter om door te gaan.                                                                               
    F3=Afsluiten   F12=Annuleren                                                  
    (C) COPYRIGHT IBM CORP. 1980, 2007.                                           
    WRKOBJ OBJ(STARTUP) OBJTYPE(*PGM):
    ==================================
                                  Werken met objecten                                                                               
    Typ opties en druk op Enter.                                                  
       2=Machtiging bewerken   3=Kopiëren   4=Wissen      5=Machtiging afbeelden   
       7=Naam wijzigen         8=Beschrijving afbeelden   13=Beschrijving wijzigen                                                                               
    OPT  OBJECT      TYPE      BIBLIOTH.   KENMERK     BESCHRIJVING               
          STARTUP     *PGM      SYSIB       CLP    <-- !!!                         
          STARTUP     *PGM      DE1EHP      CLLE        10/31/10 19:10:00, ILE vers                                                                               
    EINDE       
    Parameters voor opties 5, 7 en 13 of opdracht                                 
    ===>                                                                          
    F3=Afsluiten   F4=Lijst   F5=Vernieuwen   F11=Namen en typen   F12=Annuleren  
    F16=Zoekopdracht herhalen   F17=Zoeken in lijst   F24=Meer toetsen            
    I explained in the customer ticket in details how do you have to setup the library list in front of the STARTEHPI command, basically there are some needed CHGSYSLIBL calls with OPTION(*REMOVE).
    BTW, your EHPI is currently running and waits for connects from SDT GUI.
    Regards, René

  • CS3 installs but won't run

    Ok - not sure if this goes in this section or not.. but it's a technical question.
    My b/f bought me a Dell Laptop last week. It has the recommended minimum of everything adobe says it needs for photoshop CS3 (see below for 1721 specs)
    When I installed it on the laptop - it was slow, but said it installed. But when I go to open up Photoshop, it opens the screen - and then just hangs. After about 5 minutes it says not responding and I close it. Any of the other programs that came with won't even get that far. I click on them and it gives the little "thinking" circle (as I call it.. lol) and then nothing.
    I have read that CS3 has issues with Vista - but their site says the home premium should work. I've also read about 64 bit issues.. but the OS is 32 bit - so it's capable of running 32bit systems... I guess.
    I called adobe yesterday after installing and reinstalling CS3 15+ times... with the same issue. I was on the phone for about 2 hours with them. Basically - they have NO CLUE what it would be since it installs fine and opens with no error messages. I checked the log files and there is nothing in there I see that says any kind of error.
    I have disable windows defender, uninstalled McAfee and google desktop (all are known to cause issues with CS3), I have ALL non MS startup services turned off.. I have turned off the MS users control.. all suggested by the adobe tech.
    I have installed using the run as administrator. Nothing. Created a new admin account and installed on that user and opened on reg admin account. Nothing. (again typical things that correct cs3 install issues)
    The last thing the guy said was that it might be a video issue. I checked and there aren't any issues mentioned and no driver updates listed.
    We tryed installing this on my b/f's laptop. He bought the exact one I have (except his is red.. mine blue.. lol) and it does the EXACT same thing...
    So today we called dell. they say it's a software issue and won't answer any questions for free. Apparently only hardware support is free... But they won't accept this is a hardware conflict with the software..
    errrrr
    Anybody have any clues on this?
    =======================================
    LAPTOP SPECS:
    Inspiron 1721 Notebook: AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-56 (1MB/1.8GHz) Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium
    Operating System
    Genuine Windows Vista Home Premium
    Memory
    2 GB DDR2 SDRAM 677MHz (2 DIMMs)
    Hard Disk Drive
    120 GB SATA Hard Drive (5400 RPM)
    Video
    ATI RADEON Xpress1270 HyperMemory
    Media Bay
    8X DVD +/- RW w/dbl layer write capability
    Base
    Inspiron 1721 Notebook: AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-56 (1MB/1.8GHz)
    Bluetooth Wireless
    Bluetooth Wireless Card 355
    Software Upgrade
    Microsoft Works 8.5
    Premium Pack - Advanced Photo+Music: Deluxe Pack + Paint Shop Pro XI
    NoteBook Screen
    17 inch WXGA+ TrueLife Glossy Notebook Screen
    Hardware Upgrade
    No Camera
    6 Cell Primary Battery
    90W AC Adapter
    Network Interface Card
    Dell 1505 Wireless-N

    Rob - thanks for taking a stab at this.
    I have tried installing from the DVD and also from the zip file. the zip file was extracted to the hard drive brfore I ran it - and I ran it as administrator.
    And when it stalls - it gives the (NOT RESPONDING) tag on the window - which usually means that even if I leave it (and I have for up to 20 minutes) - still nothing.
    Here's the update from my dealings with DEll today...
    Dell tech support guy told me that it was a know issue that CS3 WON'T run on Vista and that Adobe is working the issue
    Told them that I knew others that were running it on Vista and it worked fine. They had no answer.
    Then I waited for the Technical support manger to call. This is after expressing my displeasure to the technical supervisor about them trying to pawn this issue off on anyone else but themselves. Why can't they go grab a 1721 off the shelf and replicate the issue and try to figure it out from there?!?!?!
    I used to work on a network helpdesk.. if I tried to pull that crap answer without trying to replicate the issue and AT LEAST try to find an answer.. I wouldn't have lasted very long at all!!!!
    The Tech manager told me to call customer support and ask for an OS swap (from vista to XP) because they don't know what the problem is and so it muct be a Vista compatibility issue
    I call customer support. They say that they no longer will give out XP since it is a step backwards. And to install XP on the machine ourselves (even a liscensed copy) would void the warranty. They suggest I talk to sales about swapping the laptop out with a "more compatible" one. Which isn't a totally bad idea since I really do think it is an AMD/ATI conflict.
    They transfer me to Sales.. ohh - you used the Employee Purchase program.. you need to talk to them.. and they transfer me.
    The EPP people tell me.. ohhhh you didn't actually go through us since you bought it off the Dell Outlet store. So they transfer me.
    The dell outlet store says they will be more than happy to swap me out to an Intel based machine.
    Only catch is the Intels are more expensive. They don't have any for the price we paid for the amd's. Fot about $40 more I can get one with a slower processer, a gig less ram, no dvd writer, but with a 160gb hd. To get compatible to mine - would be about $150 more.
    And they only have silver in the low end, and black or brown in the higher. Not that I really give a s@!t what the color is.. but it brings up the main reason I am sooo pissed abput all of this....
    Why should I have to pay more money, settle on doing without option/features want/need.. just because THEY don't want to take the time to figure out what the real issue is?!?!?! Why isn't it them doing these calls and doing all this troubleshooting.. Why am I being peanilzed for THEM not wanting to do their jobs....
    Told the B/F that I am done with Dell. That I don't want the laptop anymore and I don't want any other one from them. He says he'll pay the extra and get me the other one.. but that isn't the point....
    Not sure what my next move is.

  • How do I install the FM10 licensing fix when Adobe Update Installer won't run?

    Adobe Update Installer won't run so can't install FM10 licensing fix
    This question is Not Answered.(Mark as assumed answered)
    Aug 9, 2013 12:09 PM
           Tags (edit): none (add)  
    Because FM10 began crashing with "fatal" errors whenever I tried to generate a TOC for a small (65 page) book, I researched workarounds and none of them worked. Now that I have delivered a crippled deliverable via Acrobat manipulations, I would like to fix FM. I uninstalled it and reinstalled it, got some updates, and then received the "licensing fix" error that popped up in January. I'm wondering why this fix was included not in the updates. That said, the licensing fix package, first, would not unzip so I downloaded it again. I unzipped it but I got a message that Adobe Updater Installer could not run and after several clicks I found that file. I reinstalled Adoble Update Installer but it still does not run.
    I am running Windows XP and have TCS 3.5.I uninstalled FM and RH but not Acrobat, Captivate, or Photoshop.
    So, now what? Listen to my supervisor who says never use FM again?
    P.S. Why do I have to enter a title for my question and then do it again when this page opens??

    Give Adobe Support a call or contact the TCS team at [email protected] - something in your environment is causing the installer to fail (I'd guess).

  • Action steps that won't run correctly in PSE 7/8/9 (but did in 4 and 6)

    I have a wonderful action that was written to work in PSE 3/4/6.  It won't run in PSE 7/8/9.  After fooling around for a while, I think I understand why.  Adobe changed the way Adjustment Layers are handled.  In earlier versions of Photoshop and Elements, Adjustment Layers threw up a modal dialog box.  That changed so that Adjustment Layers now appear in the Palette Bin as a palette.
    Here a sample of some of the action steps that won't work correctly:
    Make adjustment layer
    Using: adjustment layer
    Type: levels
    Set Selection
    To: none
    Set current layer
    To: layer
    Name:  “Adjustment 1”
    Set current layer
    To: layer
    Mode: luminosity
    Stop
    Message:  “Move gray slider left”
    With Continue
    Set current adjustment layer
    To: levels
    In earlier versions of PS and PSE, the way these steps would work is that a new adjustment layer would be created, the dialog box giving the instruction would open, it would be dismissed by clicking "Continue," and then the "Set current adjustment layer to: Levels" would generate a model adjustment layer dialog box would open up which would let one make the adjustment.
    In newer versions, since Adjustment Layers are handled in the Palette Bin, after dismissing the instructions, the action doesn't stop to allow the user to make change the sliders on the adjustment layer.
    The action runs perfectly in CS4 and CS5 and throws up the levels adjustment modal box as it did in PSE 4 and PSE 6, but the action doesn't throw the modal box in PSE 7/8/9
    Does anyone know of a way to alter the action steps to allow the action to stop to allow the adjustment and then to resume again?

    Adding a new levels adjustment layer on top of the Midtone contrast layer
    should work, just use a clipping mask to restrict the adjustments to the
    areas of the levels adjustment layer below. The histogram will be different, but
    actually testing the action is really the only way to know if that makes any difference.
    Replacing the levels adjustment layer is another option, though it requires a few more steps.
    The following assumes when the action gets to this point,
    the Midtone contrast adjustment layer is the active (selected) layer.
    To record this part of the action:
    1. Duplicate current channel (in the channels panel. drag the Midtone contrast mask
        down to the Create new channel icon at the bottom of the channels panel)
    2. Ctrl+click on the newly created channel (Midtone contrast mask copy)
        This loads the selection of that channel.
    3. Drag the new channel (midtone contrast mask copy) to the trash icon at the bottom
       of the channels panel.
    4. Back in the layers panel, delete the Midtone Contrast adjustment layer.
    5. Go to Layer>New Adjustment Layer>Levels
        This creates a new levels adjustment layer using the selection loaded from
        the duplicated channel and opens the levels dialog.
    To load the RGB (composite) as a selection, Ctrl+click on the rgb in the channels panel
    and the same is true for the red, green and blue channels.
    With layer masks, elements doesn't seem to want to load them as selections in actions,
    so that's the reason for the action steps above.
    MTSTUNER

  • CS2 won't run

    CS2 won't run, says activation code no longer usable. Been running win7 on this system 3 years. Adobe says it won't activate in win7. Well, it did, and ran just fine. what's up?

    I assume when you say "Adobe says it won't activate in win7" that you talked to customer support....
    A drive change could trigger the need for reactivation.  Did you tell them that you're running from a mirrored drive?
    It sounds to me that they're being aggressive about trying to get you to upgrade when they should still be supporting you with active maintenance of their activation database.
    But unfortunately if you can't get them to adjust their database you're out of luck.
    -Noel

  • I have a Windows 2003 Server 64-Bit, and when I upgraded to Firefox 4.0.1 now it won't run, it keeps saying to restart to complete the installation, but I've restarted theserver 4 times, and I still can't use it.

    I have a Windows 2003 Server 64-Bit, and when I upgraded to Firefox 4.0.1 now it won't run, it keeps saying to restart the computer to complete the installation, but I've restarted theserver 4 times, and I still can't use it.

    I ended up putting it in DFU mode.  It's kinda hard to tell it was in DFU mode because nothing showed on the screen, it was just black, but the sounds from the computer helped to tell me it was connected.
    Itunes still didn't recognize the device for whatever reason.
    So I used redsn0w.  I don't know if I can say that on these forums, but considering itunes was worthless at this point I am going to give credit where credit is due.
    Now I am giving itunes a second chance to upgrade to 5.1, if it doesn't work, well, back to redsnow and maybe I will even jailbreak it this time rather than just using the fecovery fix found under extras.

  • How do I roll-back to the previous version of Firefox? An auto update occurred and now one of the programs used at the office (ACT! v6.0 SwiftMail) won't run with the browser.

    The office I work in uses a very old version of ACT!, an accounting package. This package has a component called SwiftPage, an antiquated email system that enables us to email from the ACT DB. SwiftPage runs via the web browser.
    Firefox just did an auto update (that I will have to find out how to turn off) and now SwiftPage won't run as it is not compatible.
    Can I "roll-back" my version of Firefox or do I have to uninstall and try to re-install an older version?
    HELP!

    Try loading and using the add-on from this link: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compatibility-reporter/
    Many add-ons do in fact work if you force them to run. The procedure to roll-back is given in this article: [[installing previous versions of firefox]]
    Unfortunately the official Firefox policy is that you downgrade to 3.6 which is supported for a while longer, and not the now unsupported Firefox 4. If after installing and running the ''add-on compatibility reporter'' you still have problems there are ways around the official policy.
    I think it is absurd that Firefox 4 may be used by tens of millions of users one day and a few days later those that upgrade to Firefox 5 should be not only told not to use a now unsupported browser, if they need to revert due to problems, but are actually obstructed in attempts to do so. See also [/questions/840397#answer-205154]

  • FMS won't run on RHEL 6.2 EC2 instance - _defaultRoot__edge1 experienced 1 failure

    I've got a fresh RHEL 6.2 64-bit instance on EC2. I've turned off the firewall and have  installed an FMS 4.5 dev server. In the logs directory I have admin and master logs (only). The admin logs look ok:
    #Fields: date
    time
    x-pid
    x-status
    x-ctx
    x-comment
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2581173
    FMS detected IPv6 protocol stack!
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2581173
    FMS config <NetworkingIPv6 enable=false>
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2581173
    FMS running in IPv4 protocol stack mode!
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2581173
    Host: ip-10-204-143-55 IPv4: 10.204.143.55
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2571011
    Server starting...
    2012-02-29
    09:24:26
    1144
    (i)2631174
    Listener started ( FCSAdminIpcProtocol ) : localhost:11110/v4
    2012-02-29
    09:24:27
    1144
    (i)2631174
    Listener started ( FCSAdminAdaptor ) : 1111/v4
    2012-02-29
    09:24:28
    1144
    (i)2571111
    Server started (./conf/Server.xml).
    The master logs contain these lines, repeating every 5 seconds:
    2012-02-29
    10:43:17
    1076
    (i)2581226
    Edge (2790) is no longer active.
    2012-02-29
    10:43:17
    1076
    (w)2581255
    Edge (2790) _defaultRoot__edge1 experienced 1 failure[s]!
    2012-02-29
    10:43:17
    1076
    (i)2581224
    Edge (2793) started, arguments : -edgeports ":1935,80" -coreports "localhost:19350" -conf "/opt/adobe/fms/conf/Server.xml" -adaptor "_defaultRoot_" -name "_defaultRoot__edge1" -edgename "edge1".
    The FMS install failed, complaining about a missing libcap.so until I installed the libcap.i686 package. The following libcap packages are now installed:
    libcap.i686               
    2.16-5.5.el6    
    @rhui-us-east-1-rhel-server-releases
    libcap.x86_64             
    2.16-5.5.el6    
    @koji-override-0/$releasever
    libcap-ng.x86_64          
    0.6.4-3.el6_0.1 
    @koji-override-0/$releasever
    libpcap.x86_64            
    14:1.0.0-6.20091201git117cb5.el6
    Any help would be most appreciated.
    /Ed.

    I had the same problem on CentOS 6.2 x86_64, albeit not on EC2. It seems that the installer creates a symlink to the i686 libpcap (libcap.so.1 -> /lib/libcap.so.2) and fmsedge won't run with it. Manually removing that symlink and instead linking to the libcap.so.2 in /lib64 solved the problem for me.
    cd /opt/adobe/fms
    rm libcap.so.1
    ln -s /lib64/libcap.so.2 libcap.so.1
    HTH, Jeremy

  • Itunes update would not install due to an error, now itunes won't run and I get this message when I try to launch itunes: "This application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem"

    itunes update would not install due to an error, now itunes won't run and I get this error message when I try to launch itunes: iTunes.exe - Unable to Locate Component "This application has failed to start because MSVCR80.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem."
    I'm on a Dell PC running Vista Home Premium.
    HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    try removing all itunes and all other apple program
    follow this link for more info. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1923
    reboot ur window after uninstalling
    after that download the latest itunes setup and install.

  • ITunes won't run at all after updating 10.5

    I have recently updated iTunes to 10.5, and now it won't run/open at all. Gives me an error and doesn't even open it at all. I have tried everything apple says to do but nothing has worked so far. Please help me, I really want my iTunes running again! If you need more information/details, please ask. I'd be happy to help you if you're going to help me. :-)

    Anyone? Please?

  • Firefox won't run, but says it is when I try to unistall it - Win 7 task manager says it isn't..how can I get around this to uninstall it?

    I have been trying to open a browser window with Mozilla Firefox 6.0.2 (x86 en-US). It won't run, however, when I try to uninstall the program, it says I have to close firefox first. Win 7 task manager does not show the program as running.
    I tried again, and still get the same message from Firefox. I checked the task manager again, not running. Tried running it - won't run. Tried uninstall, got the same message, close firefox before trying to uninstall - firefox isn't running!
    I would appreciate any help that you could give me. I want to use firefox, especially since it is the browser that opens Webkinz correctly for my grandkids.

    In the task manager, are you looking at Processes? That is where you find Firefox listed when you see no interface, not in Applications.
    This page might have some useful information about that problem.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use

Maybe you are looking for