Patch 20133080:R12.PO.D compatible with 12.1.3

Hi, we are encountering the Bug 20133080, that cancels the PR line if the PO line is cancelled.
Our EBS is 12.1.3, but this patch 20133080:R12.PO.D stated that it was for 12.2.3.
however upon checking the patch details README File (https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&aru=18420063):
For 12.0.X / 12.1.X / pre-upgrade patches (using adpatch), you must shut down all Application tier services before performing the tasks in this section.
so does this mean that it's also compatible with 12.1.3? it's kind of confusing.
if it isn't compatible, is there an existing patch for 12.1.3?
if there isn't a patch for 12.1.3, where can i request a patch?
i logged an SR at MOSC asking the same questions but they didn't really give me an outright answer.
thank you!

Hi to all!
Oracle was able to create a patch for 12.1.3. (patch number 20133080:R12.PO.B).
hope this helps!

Similar Messages

PI /XI compatiblity with content

Hi,
Does anyone know if the latest PI/XI patches are all ways downwardly compatible with previous SAP supplied XI content?
Is there a SAP document to confirm this?
Thanks
Andy

Hi Andrew,
XI patches are always downward compatible. If the XI content is changed with a specific patch for a particular SAP Application, then SAP will release a new version of the content. Also the SLD content( Product and Software Component Version) will be automatically updated with the patch release.
Thanjs

'not compatible with your current codelines' and 'Patch 7461070'

We are trying to upgrade EBS from 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.1 using Maintenance Wizard v2.15, and we are on "Apply Preinstall Patches" for "Perform the Upgrade". We got some strange errors:
(1). AutoPatch error for "Task: Apply Preinstall Patches":
This patch is not compatible with your current codelines.
This patch is compatible with: entity 'xla' - codeline 'R12.XLA.A'.
Your current on-site codeline for the entity 'xla' is: 'R12.XLA.B'.
for "1-Apply patch 6832389 (Required)", "2-Apply patch 6625757 (Required)", "3-Apply patch 6648785 (Required)", "4-Apply patch 6166150 (Required)", "5-Apply patch 6146757 (Required)", "6-Apply patch 6757123 (Required)", "7-Apply patch 6172183 (Required)", "8-Apply patch 6774040 (Required)", "9-Apply patches 6976563 and 7351384 (Conditionally Required)"
(2). Got patch version mismatch errors when applying patch#7461070 for "10-Apply AD 12.1.1 upgrade driver (Required)":
###############################################################################SUMMARY - patchit12.sh - of patch: 7461070, driver: driver=u7461070.drv###############################################################################patchit12.sh - is exiting with no actions. ie. Patch 7461070 not applied.There is a mismatch between the patch version specified and the releaseversion obtained from your Applications environment. In order to applyRelease 12 patches to previous Applications versions, the patch must be applied in preinstall mode.This can be done by passing the appropriate value to the preinstall parameter of eof_patch12.sh.INFO: Not starting patch alert monitor, to start: Login Engineer, User Admin, Update Profile
For first issue:
Verified first 2 patches:
Patch 6832389:R12.AP.A R12: Critical Pre-upgrade for R12
Patch 6625757 6625757:R12.XLA.A
These patches are for 12.0 upgrade, not for 12.1
Why MW is trying to apply these R12.0 patches?
For second issue I found Note 779466.1 Patch 6604842 fails during a R12 Upgrade via Maintenance
Wizard as DB still reports R11i
similar but at 12.0 level.
Shoul all customers follow the workaround and manually apply the patch?

I got similar error:
ACTION: execute on node: apps, patch=7461070, driver=u7461070.drv
patchit12.sh REMOTE SIZE: 53273 LOCAL SIZE: 53273
OK - no update needed for patchit12.sh, same size as on EOF: 53273 bytes.
Found release REL=11.5.10.2 from fnd_product_groups.
WARNING - patchit12.sh has been invoked on a non-R12 Applications system.
SUMMARY - patchit12.sh - of patch: 7461070, driver: driver=u7461070.drv
patchit12.sh - is exiting with no actions. ie. Patch 7461070 not applied.
There is a mismatch between the patch version specified and the release
version obtained from your Applications environment. In order to apply
Release 12 patches to previous Applications versions, the patch must be
applied in preinstall mode.This can be done by passing the appropriate
value to the preinstall parameter of eof_patch12.sh.
INFO: Not starting patch alert monitor, to start: Login Engineer, User Admin, Update Profile
Should patch 7461070 be applied manually?

11i to R12 upgrade : Unable to merge patch 9179588:R12.AD.B with 9477107:R12.AD.B and patch 7461070:R12.AD.B.1

Hello Sir,
As per readme for Patch 9179588, I am trying to merge patch (9179588:R12.AD.B) with 9477107:R12.AD.B and R12.AD.B.1
(patch 7461070). When I run admrgpch without -admode option, admrgpch completes successfully.
However, when I just add -admode option in same command, getting error that "invalid option -s". Please see below details and suggest since there is Note: This merge should be a full merge using -admode.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>ls -lrt
total 13992
-rw-r--r-- 1 appltest dba 7035668 Aug 03 10:59 p7461070_R12_AIX64-5L.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 appltest dba 79016 Aug 04 03:48 p9179588_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 appltest dba 38579 Aug 04 05:22 p9477107_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 appltest dba 94 Aug 04 13:27 manifest.txt
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>cat manifest.txt
p7461070_R12_AIX64-5L.zip
p9179588_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip
p9477107_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>admrgpch -admode -s /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -d /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -merge_name merged_R12AD11 -manifest manifest.txt
Error: Invalid option: -s
usage: admrgpch -help
admrgpch <source_directory> <destination_directory>
admrgpch -s <source_directory> -d <destination_directory>
[-verbose <level>] [-merge_name <pattern>]
[-manifest <filename>] [-logfile <filename>]
where
* -help Print help message.
* -verbose <level> Can be one of: { 0(SILENT),
1(QUIET), 2(VERBOSE) or 3(LOUD) }
Default - 1(QUIET).
* -merge_name <pattern> The name of the merged patch (max 24 characters).
Default - "merged".
* -s <source_directory> Path of source directory where all patches to be
merged have been unzipped.
* -d <destination_directory> Path of destination directory where the merged
patch will be created.
* -manifest <filename> Full pathname of a file containing the list of
patch zip files to be merged.
* -logfile <filename> Admrgpch log file name.
Default:"<CWD>/admrgpch.log".
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Without option -admode :
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>admrgpch -s /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -d /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -merge_name merged_R12AD11 -manifest manifest.txt
unzipping p7461070_R12_AIX64-5L.zip..
unzipping p9179588_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip..
unzipping p9477107_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip..
Executing the merge of the patch drivers
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107
Copying files...
5% complete. Copied 44 files of 876...
10% complete. Copied 88 files of 876...
15% complete. Copied 132 files of 876...
20% complete. Copied 176 files of 876...
25% complete. Copied 219 files of 876...
30% complete. Copied 263 files of 876...
35% complete. Copied 307 files of 876...
40% complete. Copied 351 files of 876...
45% complete. Copied 395 files of 876...
50% complete. Copied 438 files of 876...
55% complete. Copied 482 files of 876...
60% complete. Copied 526 files of 876...
65% complete. Copied 570 files of 876...
70% complete. Copied 614 files of 876...
75% complete. Copied 657 files of 876...
80% complete. Copied 701 files of 876...
85% complete. Copied 745 files of 876...
90% complete. Copied 789 files of 876...
95% complete. Copied 833 files of 876...
100% complete. Copied 876 files of 876...
Character-set converting files...
3 unified drivers merged.
Patch merge completed successfully
Please check the log file at ./admrgpch.log.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I am executing admrgpch after sourcing 11i environment and version for admrgpch is :
drix10:/fmstop/fmstest/fmstestappl/ad/11.5.0/bin>adident Header admerge.pl
admerge.pl:
$Header admerge.pl 115.22 2008/09/18 12:12:08 nissubra noship $

Hi Srini,
Thanks a lot !
Actually, I tried that one as well by running admrgpch from newly installed R12 code tree and I got below error.
drix10:/fmstop/r12apps/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/bin>ls -rlt admrgpch
-rwxr-xr-x    1 appltest dba        14293576 Mar 30 2009 admrgpch
drix10:/fmstop/r12apps/apps/apps_st/appl/ad/12.0.0/bin>admrgpch -s /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -d /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -merge_name merged_R12AD11 -manifest manifest.txt -admode
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program ./admrgpch because of the following errors:
        0509-150   Dependent module libnnz10.so could not be loaded.
        0509-022 Cannot load module libnnz10.so.
        0509-026 System error: A file or directory in the path name does not exist.
Then I sourced R12 environment file and ran same command. Its completed successfully.
drix10:/fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge>admrgpch -s /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -d /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge -merge_name merged_R12AD11 -manifest manifest.txt -admode
unzipping p7461070_R12_AIX64-5L.zip..
unzipping p9179588_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip..
unzipping p9477107_R12.AD.B_R12_GENERIC.zip..
Executing the merge of the patch drivers
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070
-- Processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070/u7461070.drv
-- Done processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070/u7461070.drv
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/7461070
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588
-- Processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588/u9179588.drv
-- Done processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588/u9179588.drv
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9179588
-- Processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107
-- Processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107/u9477107.drv
-- Done processing file: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107/u9477107.drv
-- Done processing patch: /fmstop/patches/R1211AD/merge/9477107
Copying files...
5% complete. Copied 45 files of 883...
10% complete. Copied 89 files of 883...
15% complete. Copied 133 files of 883...
20% complete. Copied 177 files of 883...
25% complete. Copied 221 files of 883...
30% complete. Copied 265 files of 883...
35% complete. Copied 310 files of 883...
40% complete. Copied 354 files of 883...
45% complete. Copied 398 files of 883...
50% complete. Copied 442 files of 883...
55% complete. Copied 486 files of 883...
60% complete. Copied 530 files of 883...
65% complete. Copied 574 files of 883...
70% complete. Copied 619 files of 883...
75% complete. Copied 663 files of 883...
80% complete. Copied 707 files of 883...
85% complete. Copied 751 files of 883...
90% complete. Copied 795 files of 883...
95% complete. Copied 839 files of 883...
100% complete. Copied 883 files of 883...
Character-set converting files...
3 unified drivers merged.
Patch merge completed successfully
Please check the log file at ./admrgpch.log.

What is Oracle's recommendation of enabling a 3rd Party application for Online Patching? Is this a requirement with EBS R12.2 or is this something that can be done in phases for e.g.:

Hello -
My Oracle Partner account uses Oracle EBS, Fusion Apps and is in the process of migrating from 10g to 11g; forwarding their question here -
What is Oracle’s recommendation of enabling a 3rd
Party application for Online Patching? Is this a requirement with EBS R12.2 or
is this something that can be done in phases for e.g.
Phase 1: Oracle EBS utilizes Online patching while
the 3rd Party application does not leverage edition based
redefinition for Online patching
Phase 2: 3rd Party application is modified
to leverage edition based redefinition Online patching mechanism.
I would appreciate any insight/recommendations you may have
regarding Online patching for EBS 12.2.

This seems to be related to EBS an may be better answered in the EBS forums as this forum is dedicated to Fusion.
Jani Rautiainen
Fusion Applications Developer Relations
https://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel/

After installation of R12.1.1, upgraded with 12.1.3 patches

Hi All,
After installation of R12.1.1, upgraded with 12.1.3 patches then accessing the login page after entering the userid and password I am getting FRM-92101 error "There was a failure in the form server, please check your configuration".
I am unable to open a form in the application. My environment is:
OS = Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.5 (64-bit)
Application = R12.1.3 (VIS)
Client = Laptop having Windows 7 and IE 8, and have already disabled XSS filter.
But still not success, Kindly help so that I can start my training on this server.
Your early reply would be appreciate.
Regards
Muhammad

Hi;
FRM-92101:
Recommended Browsers for Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 [ID 389422.1]
FRM-92101: There Was a Failure in the Forms Server During Startup After Fresh R12 Installation [ID 429627.1]
R12 fresh install FORMS DO NOT LAUNCH - FRM-92101/500 [ID 427714.1]
FRM-92101: Forms Server oracle.forms.net.ConnectionException: Forms session <1> failed during startup: no response from runtime process [ID 880088.1]
Forms: 9.x and 10.x: Troubleshooting FRM-92050, FRM-921xx [ID 189867.1]
Known Causes of FRM-92101 Error In Forms [ID 604633.1]
Also check:
http://onlineappsdba.com/index.php/2009/06/15/frm-92101-with-internet-explorer-8-how-to-uninstall-ie8/
Re: R12 database and JRE Issue
FRM-92101 There was a failure in the forms server during startup
Regard
Helios

Error while Apply Patch 8764069:R12.FND.B (Patch 8764069)

Hii...
im upgrading my oracle apps from 12.0.4 to 12.1.1 and following the metalink document
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Maintenance Pack Installation Instructions [ID 752619.1]
Now while applying the Patch 8764069:R12.FND.B (Required),
it returns a error like
AutoPatch error:
This patch is not compatible with your current codelines.
This patch is compatible with: entity 'fnd' - codeline 'R12.FND.B'.
Your current on-site codeline for the entity 'fnd' is: 'R12.FND.A'.
You should not apply this patch.
Apply an equivalent patch that is compatible with your
current codelines instead.
AutoPatch error:
A fatal error related to codelines or codelevels has occurred.
how can i resolve my issue..??..plz suggestt
Thankss..

Now while applying the Patch 8764069:R12.FND.B (Required),
Patch 8764069 is "POST USERMIGRATE TO HASH PASSWORDS, AFTER 12.1 UPG, FNDCPASS FAILS DECRYPT" and it required R12.FND.B to be installed.
it returns a error like
AutoPatch error:
This patch is not compatible with your current codelines.
This patch is compatible with: entity 'fnd' - codeline 'R12.FND.B'.
Your current on-site codeline for the entity 'fnd' is: 'R12.FND.A'.
You should not apply this patch.
Apply an equivalent patch that is compatible with your
current codelines instead.
AutoPatch error:
A fatal error related to codelines or codelevels has occurred.
how can i resolve my issue..??..plz suggesttYou are on R12.FND.A patchset and you should have R12.FND.B patchset installed in order to apply this patch. This is clearly explained in the patch README file -- https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&aru=11652182
So, apply R12.AD.B.1 (7461070) as mentioned in the README file then patch 8764069:R12.FND.B using "adpatch preinstall=y".
Thanks,
Hussein

Patching in R12

Hi,
I need to apply a patch. The patch says it is compatible with (R12.PER.B, R12.HR_PF.B, 12.1.0, 12.1.1).
I am on 12.1.1. and my current patch_level is R12.PER.B.1
How can i find on which (PF) i am on. In 11i we is to use decode function with corresponding patch number.
Regards
Taher

Hi,
These are the patches you need to query:
Patch 7446767 - R12.HR_PF.B.delta.1
Patch 8337373 - R12.HR_PF.B.delta.2
Or, run patchsets.sh as suggested before.
Regards,
Hussein

Old Bookmarks are not compatible with Firefox version 20+

Background Information:
I use the old client version 3.6 as there's an old utility addon that the author stopped updating and will not work with the newer revisions. Despite disabling the update feature both in about:config and in preferences, the browser still eventually updates (Originally I was using 3.4, and would prefer to use that, but no matter how much I try I can no longer roll it back from 3.6 to 3.4 even if I reinstall using a 3.4 installer). As a result I've had a habit of keeping a copy of my firefox directory in case it updates itself again without asking, which it has. This might help you guys out in answering the countless people who have lost their bookmarks due to the upgrades released this year, and will hopefully someone to investigate and release a patch/utility to fix the issue.
Issue:
I have verified that the newest clients from at least version 20 and onwards, are not compatible with the older bookmark JSON files. People who have been upgraded to the latest revision not only lose their bookmarks, but CANNOT restore them either, as Firefox will only return the error message: "Unable to Process the Backup File".
I have confirmed that the files themselves are perfectly intact with no sign of corruption, and are as intended. They restore ok to older browser revisions (In my case specifically 3.6), but will not restore to the newer client revisions. This is not a fault with the bookmark backups, but with the newer clients (I'm guessing they changed the way they store the information in the JSONs at some point. I note in the code for the JSONs that GUID was never used in the older revisions, but it is in the newer revisions. Perhaps this is causing an incompatibility issue? You just need to adjust the client so that it looks for the GUID and if none can be found to ignore it rather than decide the file is corrupt.
Old JSON Code snippet: {"title":"","id":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1306670152435000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","id":2,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1306666129870000,"lastModified":1381254048121000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","id":6,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&sort=12&excludeQueries=1&excludeItemIfParentHasAnnotation=livemark%2FfeedURI&maxResults=10&queryType=1"},{"index":1,"title":"Recent Tags","id":7,"parent":2,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"mimeType":null,"type":3,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:sort=14&type=6&maxResults=10&queryType=1"},{"index":2,"title":"","id":8,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1294868015246000,"lastModified":1294868015246000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-separator"}
New JSON Code Snippet: {"title":"","guid":"5rkFafJ6AnRZ","id":1,"index":0,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387525168000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"placesRoot","children":[{"title":"Bookmarks Menu","guid":"m7vLM41-lzQi","id":2,"index":0,"parent":1,"dateAdded":1396387525168000,"lastModified":1396387526173000,"type":"text/x-moz-place-container","root":"bookmarksMenuFolder","children":[{"title":"Recently Bookmarked","guid":"BEffyw6xva93","id":13,"index":0,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentlyBookmarked"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:folder=BOOKMARKS_MENU&folder=UNFILED_BOOKMARKS&folder=TOOLBAR&queryType=1&sort=12&maxResults=10&excludeQueries=1"},{"title":"Recent Tags","guid":"WmnlbVv38Bjv","id":14,"index":1,"parent":2,"dateAdded":1396387526172000,"lastModified":1396387526172000,"annos":[{"name":"Places/SmartBookmark","flags":0,"expires":4,"value":"RecentTags"}],"type":"text/x-moz-place","uri":"place:type=6&sort=14&maxResults=10"}
Solution?
Well in my case I had a backup copy of the old revision directory. To restore I opened the copy, and exported the bookmarks as an HTML, which I restored in the newer client. If you do not have a copy of the old client, the best thing would be to try and reinstall an older revision of the client and either make a copy of the program folder and use another copy of that so you can use both the new and old clients and not worry about the loss of an older revision since you'll always have 2 copies of the old client (One you're using, one you use to restore if it upgrades). Or you export the bookmarks as an HTML, then upgrade the client to the newest and import the HTML instead of the JSON files.
Please investigate and create an easier solution to a silly incompatibility issue. ^_^

This happens if you create a backup and forget to add the file extension manually when Firefox didn't add it automatically or you may have removed it when modifying the suggested name.

API5036: Client version 10.2.0.1.31 is not compatible with repository ver..

API5036: Client version 10.2.0.1.31 is not compatible with repository version 10.2.0.2.0
I got this error after upgraded with patch p5696353_10202_AIX64-5L
I tried to log in but there was a pop up dialog told me about this error. Do I have to install new client version?? I cannot find owb client 10.2.0.2.0 on the download site. Would you guys help me to get though this please?? Any solotion if I still used owb client version 10.2.0.1??
Rgds,
Godtee

Hi Godtee,
you have to use the same version on the client as on the server.
There is only one software package containing owb client and server components. Use it for server and client side installations.
It seems that you have patched your server installation to 10.2.0.2.0. Apply this patch to your client installation and you will be able to connect to the repository with version 10.2.0.2.0
Regards,
Carsten.

OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0

Im trying to start the database enterprise manager and I get this error on the log file:
OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0 Repository needs to be patched.
Database version is 11.2
O.S. version is: Linux 2.6.9-78.0.0.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jul 25 14:41:56 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I use this to upload database and console:
export ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
export ORACLE_BASE=/opt/oracle/
export ORACLE_SID=orcl
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/lsnrctl start
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/dbstart /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/emctl start dbconsole
when I excecute that, I see this on the console:
Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control Release 11.2.0.1.0
Copyright (c) 1996, 2009 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
https://192.168.2.210:1158/em/console/aboutApplication
Starting Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g Database Control ........... started.
Logs are generated in directory /opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/machine_one_lega/sysman/log
So I try to go there, and the web browser shows this:
503 Service Unavailable
Service is not initialized correctly. OMS version 10.2.0.4.2 is not compatible with repository version 10.1.0.4.0.
Can you help me find this solution?
thanks

Hi Ingenio,
This problem sometimes occur when the listener is not running, hence connection cannot be done without listener.

TARGET database is not compatible with RMAN version

Hi all,
we have an issue related to RMAN version.
A few weeks ago we update our 10.2.0.1 Oracle Database to 10.2.0.4 using 6810189 pacth set.
Now when we try to execute RMAN this is the output:
Recovery Manager : Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production on Jue Nov 20 12:20:57 2008
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Recovery Manager incompatible with TARGET database: RMAN 8.0.4.0 to 10.2.0.4 needed
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00554: initialization of internal recovery manager package failed
RMAN-06429: TARGET database is not compatible with this version of RMAN
(I translate the spanish message, maybe the words is not exactly the same in the english version)
As is shown in the output the RMAN version installed by the pacthset is higher than database version, is there a way to downgrade RMAN or to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Alex

I'm pretty sure patchset 6810189 does not install RMAN executable 11g. I did several patchings to 10.2.0.4 and that never happened. Patching may sometimes leave components at a lower level than the patchset,but never the opposite is true. That would be definitely a bug. So you (or someone else) installed 11g software.
Werner

How can I download FF 6? FF 7.0.1.4288 (the version I am using) is not compatible with Norton 360. I need to return to FF 6.

FF 7.0.1.4288 intermittently uses 97-100% of CPU capacity for a few seconds, alternating with a few seconds of normal idle usage; this can continue for long periods. During these periods the computer responds very slowly. I can terminate it (temporarily) by rebooting.
FF 7 occasionally uses 97-100% of capacity continuously for several minutes; my impression is that it would continue indefinitely if I did not reboot. When I try to reboot in this condition, FF does not respond, I have to click End Now, in which case previous sessions are not saved.
Norton believes this is due to an interaction between FF 7 and Norton 360. They say that 7.0.1.4288 is a beta version. Norton tells me that 360 should become compatible with FF 7 in a month or two. In the mean time I need to reinstall FF 6.
I cannot see how to do this on your website.
Please help.

Firefox 7.0.1 is an update to Firefox 7.0 and there was no beta of Firefox 7.0.1.
You may need to update Norton. A patch for their toolbar to make it compatible with Firefox 7 was released on the same day that Firefox 7 was released. You may need to run Norton's "Live Update" several times to get all that is needed.
*See --> http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Internet-Security-Norton/Firefox-7-0-Compatibility-Patch-is-now-available/td-p/547384
'''If this reply solves your problem, please click "Solved It" next to this reply when <u>signed-in</u> to the forum.'''
Does not relate to your question, but...
You have multiple old Java Console extensions that Java did not clean-up during updates. You need Java Console only if you do Java programming/development or debug Java applets on web pages. You can see them in Add-ons > Extensions, '''''but you can not remove them from there'''''. Removing them will not affect the functioning of Java on websites. You can '''''manually''''' remove them, '''''if you do not do Java development work''''' to avoid future, possible problems/conflicts:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Java#Multiple_Java_Console_extensions
Your old Java Console extensions:
*Java Console 6.0.22 {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0022-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
*Java Console 6.0.23 {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0023-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
*Java Console 6.0.24 {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0024-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
*Java Console 6.0.26 {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0026-ABCDEFFEDCBA}

How can I set up a database program for inputing baseball team statistics that is compatible with numbers?

I have been asked to be a statistician bar and athletic team. We are playing Dartball, a game of darts that is based on baseball. The previous status station used Apple works which included a database manager that was compatible with numbers. I have checked with the Apple geniuses online for my MacBook Pro and they did not have an answer to my problem. Is there a program that can be used on my MacBook Pro that will keep up with statistics for eight baseball team?

Im all for the dumb questions, because its probably a dumb mistake I did.
I have checked that both sus ped and exp. ped are fully plugged in.
Neither pedals show up in the Midi meter in the transport.
I dont know how to set a patch for the keyboard, but if both pedals work in other programs (i.e. Reason), wouldn't it not be an issue with a Logic configuration and not in the keyboard's setting? (Unless I have a separate Logic setting that loads automatically when it detects Logic is booted. I dont know how that would work though.)
Thank you for your prompt help, though. Any other ideas?

Unable to refresh the schema of FIM MA.Getting an error in Event viewer ""the current version of database is not compatible with the one expected by Forefront Identity Manager service. The current version of database is : 1116. The expected version is :1"

Hi,
We have installed FIM MA with an account that have all the sufficient rights.It got created successfully and worked for Full Import and Full Sync. But, due to some version incompatabilities, we have installed a patch.PFB link for the patch.
http://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2969673/en-us
Now, we are trying to refresh the schema of FIM MA. While doing that we are facing an error "Failed to connect to database". The user account with which we are connecting has read and write permissions on DB.In the event viewer some errors are
logged like "the current version of database is not compatible with the one expected by Forefront Identity Manager service. The current version of database is : 1116. The expected version is :1122" with event ID 3. PFB images for more detailed
view.
Please advice how to fix the issue.
Thanks
Prasanthi.

Hello,
seems to me that you maybe only updated the syncengine but not portal/webservice.
I had that error once after an recovery from scratch and forgot one of the hotfixes to apply to all services.
-Peter
Peter Stapf - ExpertCircle GmbH - My blog:
JustIDM.wordpress.com

Patch 20133080:R12.PO.D compatible with 12.1.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for