Patch 8.0.5.1.0 BAD

Oracle posted a patch
ftp://oracle-ftp.oracle.com/server/patch_sets/LINUX/80patchsets
/80510
I have a lot of problem with it. It doesn't find files and
the upgrade fails.
Anyone tried this ?
Eddy
P.S.: I want to see MTS and the agent working again !!!
null

I tried it but I am still getting error messages. Could not find
a bunch of files in ...helpdoc/help/*
It tries to copy from the destinaion to the soruce ?????
/oracle/8.0.5/ocommon/install/platform/platfrom_common.dei to
/home/oracle/oracle/orainst/platform_common.dei
Any idea ?
Eddy
L.Ferrando (guest) wrote:
: Eddy Hahn (guest) wrote:
: : Oracle posted a patch
: : ftp://oracle-
ftp.oracle.com/server/patch_sets/LINUX/80patchsets
: : /80510
: : I have a lot of problem with it. It doesn't find files and
: : the upgrade fails.
: : Anyone tried this ?
: : Eddy
: : P.S.: I want to see MTS and the agent working again !!!
: Yes, and is fine. 1 fst. stop the DB and you unzip and untar
the
: file lnxpatch.tgz in an tmp directory then execute
lnxpatch.sh,
: 2& you unzip and untar the linux_80510patchset.tgz and then
yoy
: may run orainst from the orainst directory. With the instaler
: you can chose FROM the directory in wich you untar the file
and
: chose install the products listed.
null

Similar Messages

Solaris 10 X86 kernel patch 118844-30 ... probably bad

I installed the patch on some Dells. Seemed to run fine.
Actually, I installed 121127-01, 113000-07, and 118344-06
first since they were required by 118844-30.
Some problems have now turned up.
1. When you power cycle one of the patched machines they
refuse to boot with
Warning - The following files in / differ from the boot archive:
/boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
to continue booting .. #svc clear system/boot-archive
and then demand the root password.
2. Randomly, when you do a reboot, a patched machine will claim
that the hardware has changed and demand that you run
kdmconfig. Simply going in and out of kdmconfig, without
changes, does the job. Weird.
3. I went to patch the next machine and after the patch
install and reboot, it was a total brick, with the error
File not executable
Panic : No entry point in kernel/unix
Press any key to reboot
And, naturally, this patch cannot be backed out. For yucks
I tried the equivalent patches on a sparc. No problems. So
I think Sun effed up the GRUB stuff in the kernel patch

Ok ... I noticed that deep down in the README for the patch
they say to do a "reboot -r". Cute. We'll try that.
That seemed to go ok, but when I tried a power cycle, it
wouldn't boot, claiming
SMF database integrity check of /etc/svc/repository.db
failed making me run
/lib/svc/bin/restore_repository
which turned out to be a struggle.
My advice - stay FAR AWAY from this patch. At minumum,
it makes the power up boot process VERY delicate. Wait
for the -32 rev, which I predict will not be long in coming.
Thank you sun.

Patch for HTMLB Handling of Internet Explorer 7

Hi,
My project is using Portal NW04s SP9. When I logon to Portal using Internet Explorer (IE 7), javascript error "_htmlMessageBar is undefined" came out and all the function links such as Help, Personalize, Logout are not function at all.
I read the SAP Note 990763 - HTMLB Handling of Internet Explorer 7, and glad to see that, this issue can be fixed by applying Patch 4 for NW04s SP9.
However, I am not able to get Patch 4 for NW04s SP9 in SAP Service Marketplace! I downloaded and deployed the Patch for PORTAL 7.00 SP09 (Patch Level 10 - which I think is the most relevent patch) to my Portal Server. Bad luck, same problem still exists.
Is there anyone has downloaded and applied the Patch 4 for NW04s SP9 before? Can you please tell me where can i get this patch?
Thanks a lot,
HauChee

Hi Nitin,
Thanks for your reply.
Finally, I found the correct patch file under SAP Support Portal -> Download -> SAP Support Packages -> Entry by Application Group -> Support Packages and Patches -> SAP NetWeaver -> SAP NETWEAVER -> SAP NETWEAVER 2004S -> Entry by Component -> Enterprise Portal -> PORTAL FRAMEWORK 7.00 -> #OS independent -> Patch for PORTAL FRAMEWORK 7.00 SP09. Click on the info link, you can check out the patch info, and you will find out that, it included the HTMLB Supports IE7 in patch level 4.
Anyway, thank for your suggestion and I appreciate that.
Thanks,
HauChee

[SOLVED]tint2-svn out-of-date

Not compiling and build is flagged as out-of-date. No contact info of the maintainer. What to do now?
Last edited by Paingiver (2015-03-07 23:11:52)

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ar … do_I_do.3F
It builds fine without all those patches. Having static patches to VCS code is a bad idea from the outset.

Webcacheadmin permission issue

hi,
my config :
Linux x86 RHEL 2.4.9
Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.0.2
32-bit
my problem :
opmnctl startproc process-type=WebCacheAdmin fails with a permission error
described here after:
[root@rhas02 bin]# tail /products/oracle/as1012/midportalforms/webcache/logs/event_log
[02/Aug/2007:08:52:10 +0000] [alert 11817] [ecid: -] Unable to allocate or access a shared
memory segment of size 208 bytes. shmget(): Permission
denied
[02/Aug/2007:08:52:10 +0000] [alert 9609] [ecid: -] The server process could not initialize.
[02/Aug/2007:08:52:10 +0000] [alert 9000] [ecid: -] Process 7816 exit(1) at 890:main.c [Build 10.1.2.0.2 050802]
has anyone ever had such problem?
thanks for answers

Guessing here, but you may want to double check your kernal parameters and your OS patch levels. I've seen bad kernal parameters as the root cause of a lot of shared memory issues before.

ORA-01788: CONNECT BY clause required in this query block

My Oracle version is: 10.2.0.4.0 (for both DEV and PROD)
Below is the SQL which throws error ORA-01788 on PROD during the execution. I can guarantee that the syntax is right.
Also, the odd thing about this is that, it works fine on the DEV which is the same version as the PROD.
So, could anyone help explain why? Is it a oracle bug?
is there any easy workaround for this?
Thanks in advance
SELECT *
FROM
DI_CODE_LEVEL,
( SELECT D.TYPE_CODE,D.CODE,D.CODE_DESC FROM DI_CODE_LEVEL D WHERE D.TYPE_CODE='KHLX-V'
) KHLX,
DM_D_LO_CUST,
DM_D_ALL_ORG,
DM_D_DATE,
DM_F_LO_HTZXFX,
DM_D_AREA_CONFIG
WHERE
( DM_F_LO_HTZXFX.ORG_ID=DM_D_ALL_ORG.ORG_ID
AND DM_D_ALL_ORG.FROM_DT<=to_date(20100225,'YYYYMMDD')
and DM_D_ALL_ORG.TO_DT>to_date(20100225,'YYYYMMDD') )
AND ( DM_F_LO_HTZXFX.CUST_ID=DM_D_LO_CUST.CUST_ID )
AND ( to_date(DM_D_DATE.DAY_ID,'YYYYMMDD')=DM_F_LO_HTZXFX.CURRENT_DT )
AND ( DI_CODE_LEVEL.TYPE_CODE='QY' )
AND ( DM_D_LO_CUST.AREA_ID=DM_D_AREA_CONFIG.DQ_ID
and DM_D_AREA_CONFIG.FROM_DT<=to_date(20100225,'YYYYMMDD')
and DM_D_AREA_CONFIG.TO_DT>to_date(20100225,'YYYYMMDD') )
AND ( KHLX.CODE=DM_D_LO_CUST.CUST_TYPE )
AND ( DM_D_ALL_ORG.S_SYSTEM='EAS-LO' )
AND ( DI_CODE_LEVEL.CODE=DM_D_AREA_CONFIG.QY_ID )
---problematic part starts
AND ( DM_D_ALL_ORG.ORG_ID in
 ( select distinct org_id from DM_D_ALL_ORG
 where (S_SYSTEM='EAS-LO')start with org_id in
 (select org_id from T_USER_ORG_MAPPING where upper(user_id)= upper('Administrator') )
 CONNECT BY UP_ORG_ID=PRIOR ORG_ID ) )
---ends
AND DM_D_ALL_ORG.ORG_ID = '12110000'
 AND (DI_CODE_LEVEL.CODE = '100000' OR DI_CODE_LEVEL.UP_CODE = '100000' )
 AND ( DM_D_DATE.DAY_ID=20100225 );PS: the code is created by program, so please bear with the ugliness.
Thanks

PhoenixBai wrote:
Futher findings about this case is that it works perfectly fine when I don`t create any bitmap indexes for the fact tables.
Once I create bitmap indexes for the fact table, it throws this annoying ORA-01788 errors.This has got to be frustrating! Indexes (bitmap or btree) should not influence query parsing errors :(
You say the same code workes in dev. Something is different:
* are you certain the code is the same in both places?
* initialization/session parameters?
* database patches level?
Query transformation gone bad? Try using the NO_QUERY_TRANSFORMATION hint to see if the error recurs (warning: this may affect performance)

Device history report incredible slow

Hi,
Our device history report is incredible slow. We have had the same problem from the start using the SAP ME product.
Device history report is very useful, but has no value when it takes 2 minutes to run.
We are running 5.2.5.4 release. Performance in application is good and all other reports are running fast. Debugging shows me that the code could be improved for this report. At one time report was improved to run in "only" 20 seconds.
Last time I think the issue was fixed in SP03 Patch 1. It's really bad for the product that this useful report is this slow.

Hello Knut Ole,
I would suggest opening a support ticket in order to investigate the performance issue. SQL trace with timing information must be analyzed.
Regards,
Alex.

Lots of missed calls on my iPhone 3G

Has anyone experienced missed calls on iPhone 3G? I have experienced a great number of missed calls on my brand new iPhone 3G. Lots of calls got directed to my voicemail. My phone never rang... Sometimes when the signal bars indicate the reception is strong, this problem still occurs. I went to the AT&T retail store where I got the phone and was told that I should go to Apple Store. I went to the Apple store in Valley Fair in Santa Clara, CA, but got no help at all... The guys at the Genius Bar in the store were impatient and ignorant...
Any suggestions? Should I reset the phone? Would Apple's latest patch fix the problem?

Too bad noone was willing to help you at either store.
Try this, turn off the 3G radio and see if it improves. If not go back to where you bought it and ask to return or check your provisioning.
3G reception is poor on the iPhone.

Kernel Patch 108528-26 bad?

On machine: SunOS boedev 5.8 Generic_108528-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-MP
As part of the J2SE recommended patches, I attempted install of the downloaded 108528-26 kernel patch and received:
<snip>
Installation of <SUNWcar> was successful.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
pkgadd: ERROR: source path </export/home/src/J2SE_Solaris_8_Recommended/108528-2
6/SUNWcarx.u/reloc/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod> is c
orrupt
file cksum <38281> expected <38278> actual
pkgadd: ERROR: source path </export/home/src/J2SE_Solaris_8_Recommended/108528-2
6/SUNWcarx.u/reloc/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod> is
corrupt
file size <4832> expected <4830> actual
file cksum <34048> expected <33987> actual
Installation of <SUNWcarx> partially failed.
------------------------------>
Then, without rebooting, I downloaded the separate patch 108528-26 and attempted to load with patchadd...basically the same result:
Installation of <SUNWcar> was successful.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
WARNING: /kernel/sys/sparcv9/rpcmod <no longer a regular file>
pkgadd: ERROR: source path </export/home/src/patches/108528-26/SUNWcarx.u/reloc/
platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod> is corrupt
file cksum <38281> expected <38278> actual
pkgadd: ERROR: source path </export/home/src/patches/108528-26/SUNWcarx.u/reloc/
platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000/kernel/misc/sparcv9/platmod> is corrupt
file size <4832> expected <4830> actual
file cksum <34048> expected <33987> actual
Installation of <SUNWcarx> partially failed.
I think this patch is "bad" as it has been released... but I have as yet seen no acknowledgement of that. Anyone else tried this patch?!
The machine reboots and runs, but in what state is it left with the new patches running on the old kernel?
I have posted this to other related groups. Thanks. jj.

JJ,
I downloaded and tried to install this patch this weekend. I am having the same problems. Anyone know where I can get patch 108528-21? I need this for a piece of software I am installing.
Thanks,
Sherryl

[svn] 3189: Accepted patch supplied in SDK-16641 and SDK-16643 to fix bad text measurement when the textIndent style is non-zero (as reported in SDK-16454 and SDK-15558).

Revision: 3189 Author: [email protected] Date: 2008-09-11 17:33:50 -0700 (Thu, 11 Sep 2008) Log Message: ----------- Accepted patch supplied in SDK-16641 and SDK-16643 to fix bad text measurement when the textIndent style is non-zero (as reported in SDK-16454 and SDK-15558). The reported width should include the indent. Although this fixes the problems reported with Accordion and Button labels (and some other components like Panel that appeared in the bug examples), it doesn't fix the Text component (even though it appeared in the bug eaxmple for SDK-15558). For example, the following still is truncated for some reason: <mx:Text text="This mx:text gets truncated" textIndent="50"/> This is presumably a separate bug, so I'm accepting the patch as being a step forward even if not a complete solution to textIndent-related measurement problems. Reviewer: N/A Bugs: Patch SDK-16641 for SDK-16454; Patch SDK-16643 for SDK-15558 QA: Please file a new bug for the <mx:Text> problem. Doc: No Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16641 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16643 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16454 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15558 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15558 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16641 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16454 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16643 http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15558 Modified Paths: -------------- flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UITextFormat.as

Bad pixel patch correction in 2D image

In one CCD image (600X800), I have few patches of bad pixels (few are in irregular shapes, few are in regular one like rectangle of 8X8 pixels). For correcting these bad pixel patches, I am looking for some surface fitting function, which should have provision for excluding the defined pixel location.
These bad pixel patches needs to be computed by fitted surface only.

ashok_kumar wrote:
HI Thoric,
Thanks for reply,
When I convert the image in 2D array, bad patches also comes into 2D array.
of course...
and when I tried interpolation2D.vi, it considers these bad pixels for interpolation also.
I need to exclude these pixels for fitting (interpolation). How to exclude these points ?
Kindly help.
exactly, and this is where it gets complicated. So long as you know where the good and bad pixels are you can work on subsets of the 2D array that contain only one bad pixel, replacing that bad pixel with an interpolation of the surrounding good pixels. So, try working on 3x3 or 4x4 subsets that each contain only 1 bad pixel and perform the interpolation on each one at a time, putting the new interpolated result back into the original 2D array. With a knowledge of where each bad pixel is you can attack each one singularly.
Thoric (CLA, CLED, CTD and LabVIEW Champion)

Bad Patch 122460

Has anyone else had problems with patch 122460 ? I have downloaded it but when I tried to unzip it to install I get:
-bash-3.00$ unzip 122460-01.zip
Archive: 122460-01.zip
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
the last disk(s) of this archive.
unzip: cannot find zipfile directory in one of 122460-01.zip or
122460-01.zip.zip, and cannot find 122460-01.zip.ZIP, period.
-bash-3.00$
I also tried the signed patch but get a similar message.

THe download was bad.

What exactly became of the "bad patches"

Some months ago the http://www.sun.com/forte/developer/hotnews.html page advertising that some BAD patches existed without going into too much detail about them. I experienced an application breaking in DBTools.h++ after applying some recommended patches for Sun Workshop 5 and therefore rolled them back. I even stepped through the debugger and saw erroneous assignements to a template class' constructor arguments.
My revisions before patching were: 107295-01, 107311-09, 107354-01, 107355-04, 107357-07
The changed revisions after patching were 02, 11, 02, 06, 09 respectively. These are still the recommended patches and I have tried patching a completely unpatched machine at a different site also using DBTools.h++ and seeing it break again.
Questions are:
Can I obtain the older revision levels of the patches ?
Can someone shed some light on what approach to take to this ?
Thanks

Hi Chris,
Have a look at: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_koLdJqpUFo] The quality is not very good, but perhaps this will give you an idea of what's going to be available in Apex 4
Andy

Help please - Bad crashing, freezing, lines and pale patches and more

I wonder if anyone can help me. I am not very technobod and there are progressively awful problems on my Mac until it is now so slow.
I need to fix it before it dies altogether, or I throw it out of the window.....
Problems:-
Thin black lines randomly appearing across the windows.
Ghosting of windows, they leave another version when moved.
Sometimes windows just white out in areas with scribbly lines like pretend text.
Sometimes windows have large bare patches all of a sudden or go see through
Programs keep just quitting for no reason.
The whole computer just freezes every now and then. Sometimes it waits and returns, occasionally it crashes completely.
It is really painfully slow and can take me considerable minutes to open a new window or get something else up on screen.
The tool bar sometimes goes all skeletal with no background.
Loads more silly things like this... all random.
It is driving me absolutely potty. It's only used by me doing emails, filing pics, designing jam labels, letters, going on forums and things. I don't give it loads to manage unless I'm doing something spectacularly stupid. This computer ought to be big enough to run a design studio....
I have tried mackeeper, found it gave more problems than it solved, and uninstalled that, I've tried Clean my mac and only cleaned some, I left the universal binaries and the Caches alone. I then tried Onyx and fixed some listings (I kept the report) and cleaned up the caches in that, then restarted.
It is now even slower than before I started fixing it, and all of the problems are still here. I've got time machine for back up.
What can be going wrong? Is anyone able to help over the next couple of days?

It has taken me this long to reply to you because it is so slow.
Here is a pic
[IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/2rr6kqd.jpg[/IMG]
OSX 10.6.8 Snow lepoard
Hardware Overview:
Model Name:          iMac
Model Identifier:          iMac6,1
Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:          2.16 GHz
Number Of Processors:          1
Total Number Of Cores:          2
L2 Cache:          4 MB
Memory:          1 GB
Bus Speed:          667 MHz
Boot ROM Version:          IM61.0093.B07
SMC Version (system):          1.10f3
I will try the safe mode and see what happens. Thank you for helping me. It is really appreciated. I will be some time.... but will be back.

Bad patch 118844-30

Just wondering if no one else is having issues with the Sun kernel patches?
A month ago we tried to install 118844-28, which failed to install see http://forum.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=28707&tstart=0
Now they release a new kernel patch, which seem to have the exact same problem.
The patch refuses to install saying that patch 117435-02 must be installed first and machine must be rebooted. The 117435-02 patch came with the installation of the OS.
From the prepatch script     #
     # biosdev failed. We can still apply the patch if the rootdisk
     # is the same as the bootdisk
     bootdev=`prtconf -v /devices | sed -n '/boot-device/{n;p;}' | grep pci | cut -f 2 -d \'`
     rootdev=`df -k ${BASEDIR:-/} | nawk 'NR > 1 { print $1 }'`
     if [ -n "$bootdev" ] ; then
          ls -l $rootdev | grep $bootdev > /dev/null
          if [ $? = 0 ]; then
               return 0
          fi
     fiRunning prtconf -v /devices will result in the following (among other things)name='bootpath' type=string items=1
            value='/pci@0,0/pci-ide@7/ide@0/cmdk@0,0:a'
name='bios-boot-device' type=string items=1
            value='80'Since they are still using sed -n '/boot-device/{n;p;}' which will return value='80' this patch will fail to install.

I've been trying to upgrade past 118844-26 for a while. This machine started out as a Solaris 10 x86 1/06 DVD install. I experience errors like you guys have listed here. My favorite so far was this, though:
118844-27
Executing prePatch script...
Once this KU patch is installed and you have rebooted your system,
you will not be able to patchrm this patch safely. Once the NEWBOOT
support is installed, removing it may cause your system to not
be bootable.
Do you wish to continue this installation {yes or no} [yes]?
(by default, installation will continue in 60 seconds)
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
ERROR: One of the following may need to be corrected prior to installing this patch.
ERROR:
ERROR: The boot device may be different from the root device on biteme4.
ERROR: If you have booted from a floppy disk, eject the disk and reboot biteme4 prior
ERROR: to installing this patch.
ERROR: You may have forgotten to reboot biteme4 AFTER installing 117435-02.
ERROR: This configuration requires that 117435-02 be installed first and the
ERROR: system must then be rebooted prior to installing this patch.
The prepatch script exited with return code 1.
Patchadd is terminating.note the usage error on 'grep' ... apparently this patch had its grep arguments not quite sorted :)
I'll try the techniques posted here to see if I can move forward. Thanks for the input on this subject, folks!

Patch 8.0.5.1.0 BAD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for