PATCH 9.2.0.4 AVAILABLE

All,
Patch 9.2.0.4 is now available for download from metalink.
To download, go to http://metalink.oracle.com.
Login.
Click on Patches in the vertical button bar.
Use the simple search function and search for patch ID 3443542.
Download and follow the instructions in the ReadMe.html.
Notice that this version is only certified for Windows and Solaris. You will have to patch both client and server at the same time.
9.2.0.4 patches for Linux, HP-UX, AIX and Tru-64 are expected within the next month.
Thanks,
Mark.

Richard,
You can indeed wait until OWB10g comes about. The reason why it is not there yet, is because the database for Windows is not yet out, and the majority of the users use the Windows product. OWB10g will lag the database release for Windows for about 1 week. The iDS pack will as of then contain the OWB10g product.
Solaris 64 bit will be released at the same time as the Windows release. Other platforms (all platforms that the database supports, apart from Open VMS) will be provided in the weeks following the Windows and Solaris release.
Why you might bother upgrading now is if you have been running 9.2 for a while and ran into bugs that have been addressed by the 9.2.0.4 patch. Notice that the upcoming 10g release is based on the 9.2.0.4 patch, and has no other new feature than 10g source and target support.
An FAQ containing these and more questions will be posted to OTN soon.
Thanks,
Mark.

Similar Messages

Block Patch KB3002657 from installing/being available via Windows Update via Group Policy

Hi Everyone,
Been hearing a lot of issues around with KB3002657 causing Authentication issues. We've recently appeared to have similar issues. I'm currently getting out SCCM guru's to run
an inventory on our environment to review if we have had this deployed to our environment, either by Windows Update (manual), SCCM/Wsus etc. If we do we're looking to have this removed and not deployed via our normal mechanisms to stop any production outages.
I would like to see if it is possible to block/hide this update from being visible from Windows Update, possibly by Group Policy.
From memory Microsoft created specifc ADM templates for blocking updated for Internet Explorer version to assist with the same type of issues (i.e. to stop IE from being updated
via Automatic Updates). Would there by anything like this available for this update, or does anyone know of another way (specifc Registry settings or ADM files that could be edited) to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Simon

Please, see solution:
The V2 release of MS15-027 / KB 3002657 that resolves NTLM v2
authentication failures by Windows Server 2003 DCs is available:
The X86 version is at http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46147
The ia64 version is at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46204
The amd64 is at: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46054
Best Regards, Andrei ...
Microsoft Certified Professional

Not able to find out the OCT 2012 CPU patch for 11.2.0.3

Hi
I am trying to download the OCT 2012 CPU patch for the 11.2.0.3 to install on Linux x86-64 which is having OS of RHEL 5.7. I am able to get the OCT 2012 PSU patch which include the CPU patch too.
Database 11.2.0.3.4 PSU Patch 14275605, or
GI 11.2.0.3.4 PSU Patch 14275572, or
But I just require only the CPU patch. Can anyone provide me the patch number or some link where I can download the Oracle CPU patch OCT 2012

The given link take to the window where CPU patch for all the quarter available.
The Critical Patch Updates released to date are listed in the following table.
Critical Patch Update Latest Version/Date
Critical Patch Update - October 2012 Rev 1, 16 October 2012
Critical Patch Update - July 2012 Rev 1, 17 July 2012
Critical Patch Update - April 2012 Rev 2, 19 July 2012
If I click on Critical Patch Update - October 2012 its takes to the window for selectin the database version (11.2.0.3). From there it goes to the Patch Set Update and Critical Patch Update October 2012 Availability Document [ID 1477727.1] which I had already checked.
There for the database products it shows the below option.
Table 9 Patch Availability for Oracle Database 11.2.0.3
+*<moderator edit - deleted MOS Doc content - pl do NOT post such content - it is a violation of your Support agreement>*+
It doesnt have the sepreate CPU patch. The below CPU patch is for the OC4J. I had a check.
Thanks
SHIYAS M

Download of January CPU Patch, the filename is somewhat cryptic

I've tried to download the january cpu patch for three different o/s and when I click the download button, the file name looks right (i.e. p9952279_10105_SOLARIS64.zip), but when I click save the file name changes to a variation of letters and number (i.e. CAER8HUF.zip).
Why does this happen?

The given link take to the window where CPU patch for all the quarter available.
The Critical Patch Updates released to date are listed in the following table.
Critical Patch Update Latest Version/Date
Critical Patch Update - October 2012 Rev 1, 16 October 2012
Critical Patch Update - July 2012 Rev 1, 17 July 2012
Critical Patch Update - April 2012 Rev 2, 19 July 2012
If I click on Critical Patch Update - October 2012 its takes to the window for selectin the database version (11.2.0.3). From there it goes to the Patch Set Update and Critical Patch Update October 2012 Availability Document [ID 1477727.1] which I had already checked.
There for the database products it shows the below option.
Table 9 Patch Availability for Oracle Database 11.2.0.3
+*<moderator edit - deleted MOS Doc content - pl do NOT post such content - it is a violation of your Support agreement>*+
It doesnt have the sepreate CPU patch. The below CPU patch is for the OC4J. I had a check.
Thanks
SHIYAS M

[Solved] Patch for idle3-tools

Package aur/idle3-tools (0.9.1-1) installs a binary under /sbin and is thus affected by the recent /usr/bin consolidation; indeed, it was one of a handful of packages on my system that I uninstalled so I could do the upgrade.
I have flagged the package and no doubt the maintainer will attend to it in due course, but to try and help out a bit I include below the changes necessary to make the package install in a post-consolidation Arch environment. Cursory searches of the source do not suggest the presence of any (other) hard-coded paths, and the binary appears to be operable from the new location, so it's only a build issue.
(1) arch-usrbin-makefile-fix.diff (as file)
--- src/idle3-tools-0.9.1/Makefile 2011-05-31 18:48:52.000000000 +1000
+++ src/idle3-tools-0.9.1/Makefile 2013-06-08 11:41:02.000000000 +1000
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
# DESTDIR is for non root installs (eg packages, NFS) only!
DESTDIR =
-binprefix =
+binprefix = /usr
manprefix = /usr
exec_prefix = $(binprefix)/
-sbindir = $(exec_prefix)sbin
+sbindir = $(exec_prefix)bin
mandir = $(manprefix)/share/man
oldmandir = $(manprefix)/man
(2) PKGBUILD.diff (to make a new PKGBUILD) -- In addition to including the above patch, it also corrects issues identified by namcap (full package name appearing in description, and an apparent dependency on glibc)
--- PKGBUILD 2011-07-18 20:08:00.000000000 +1000
+++ PKGBUILD 2013-06-08 12:23:41.000000000 +1000
@@ -3,14 +3,18 @@
pkgname=idle3-tools
pkgver=0.9.1
pkgrel=1
-pkgdesc="Idle3-tools provides a linux/unix utility that can disable, get and set the value of the infamous idle3 timer found on recent Western Digital Hard Disk Drives."
+pkgdesc="A linux/unix utility that can disable, get and set the value of the idle3 timer found on recent Western Digital Hard Disk Drives."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://idle3-tools.sourceforge.net/"
license=('GPL')
-source=("http://download.sourceforge.net/${pkgname}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tgz")
-md5sums=('797d8775b80b7b7b67a1f8b0a5b41f30')
+depends=('glibc')
+source=("http://download.sourceforge.net/${pkgname}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tgz" arch-usrbin-makefile-fix.diff)
+md5sums=('797d8775b80b7b7b67a1f8b0a5b41f30' '10468e498dcd772180a73934435a001e')
build() {
+ #Patch Makefile per ArchLinux /usr/bin consolidation of June 2013
+ patch -Np1 -i ${srcdir}/arch-usrbin-makefile-fix.diff
+
cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}
make
As this is the first time I have actually constructed a patch myself and made it available, any (constructive) feedback is welcome; I tried to make as few changes as possible to the original files, so apologies if I missed correcting/adjusting things that should have been changed as well.
I will of course add a comment to the package page in AUR noting this topic.
Last edited by aexoxea (2013-07-19 15:32:20)

WonderWoofy wrote:
There are those free single public file hosting sites that y[o]u can use.
[#1284856]
Good point. I admit I've never looked into such services, but if I'm going to help out with things like this I probably should . I'll do some research, unless there are some particular services you (and/or the ArchLinux community in general) recommend...?
WonderWoofy wrote:
Otherwise, I would say that since the package has not been updated since it was first uploaded, you should email the maintainer and see if you get a response. I doubt that you will since it was uploaded and last updated in 2011. If you don't get a response for two weeks you can then email aur-general and have the package orphaned so that you can adopt it.
[#1284856]
Fair enough. The maintainer updated another package in AUR seven weeks ago, so there's reason to believe that they'll respond. I'll give them a bit of time to do so (as there's a workaround, per this thread), and will then follow through as you suggest; I'll also post updates here for anyone interested.
The lack of updates is likely due to upstream not having issued a new version since the package was uploaded (and the last commit to upstream is dated 24 January 2012); it's possible the tool is unmaintained upstream, though it does seem to get several hundred downloads each month (per SourceForge's stats) and there aren't lots of complaints plastered all over the discussions/bugs, so who knows?

Class IfsMessage not available in iFS 1.1.9

Hi,
I am using iFS 1.1.9 under NT.
The javadoc api documentation describes a class (oracle.ifs.adk.mail.IfsMessage) not present in the jars deployed with 1.1.9.
I understood that this class will be deprecated in the version 1.2 for NT.
Is there any patch which fixes this bug, available for my current version ? Where can I locate it ?
Under ftp://oracle-ftp.oracle.com/server/patchsets/internet/NT/ifs I could find only a patch for iFS 1.1.6.
Thank you

The Class Designer is no longer part of JDeveloper. Please check out the Deprecated and Desupported doc here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/10.1.3.0.3/desupport1013g.html
Let me know if you have use cases for the Class Designer that are not covered by new features as described in the above document.
-- Brian

JSPM in high availability

Dear Friends,
I have installed PI 7.1 in High availability using Microsoft windows MNS based cluster. It was with initial patch level 04 of Netweaver 710.
I have installed SCS, ASCS, Enque Replication Services etc in cluster mode. I have installed primary application server on Node 2 and Additional Application server on Node 1.
Now I installed SP07 using JSPM from my Primary Application server i.e. Node 1. It went successfully and my support Pack level was upgraded to Sp07. But now when I open Java stack in Node 1, It shows only home page using url - http://10.6.4.178:50000
After that if I open any link e.g. UME or NWA, it does not open and throughs following error :
Service cannot be reached
What has happened?
URL http://10.6.4.178:50000/wsnavigator call was terminated because the corresponding service is not available.
Note
The termination occurred in system PIP with error code 404 and for the reason Not found.
The selected virtual host was 0 .
What can I do?
Please select a valid URL.
If it is a valid URL, check whether service /wsnavigator is active in transaction SICF.
If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator.
ErrorCode:ICF-NF-http-c:000-u:SAPSYS-l:E-i:sappicl1_PIP_00-v:0-s:404-r:Notfound
HTTP 404 - Not found
Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team
Java is started properly on both the nodes without any error. While it is working fine on Node 2 i.e. 10.6.4.179.
Please suggest ! Do we need to do so special step for installing patch through JSM in High availability setup?
Jitendra Tayal

Hi Jitendra,
While doing a patch upgrade with JSPM in HA scenario, you need to switch off the automatic switchover option because, once the components are deployed, the J2ee gets restarted. If the automatic failover is active, the service gets switched over to the other node.
In this case, shutdown all the instances and stop the cluster.
Restart the systems. Start the cluster in the original servers.
Restart JSPM.
It should work fine then.
Let me know if it is helpful.
Best Regards
Raghu

Oracle patch 9.2.0.5 for Solaris 8 64 bit

Hi guys,
would anyone know if there is a patch 9.2.0.5 available for oracle database 9.2.0.1 on Solaris 8 64 bit.? I know there is 9.2.0.6 but wanted to check for 9.2.0.5. If so could you let me know where I can download it from as I don't seem to find it on the archives in Oracle.com.
Thanks in advance

find it on metalink.oracle.com.u need username/password.
this service is not free and You have to pay extra for using this service.

Managing patches with Sun Update Connection

I have just started using updatemanager to download and install my patches and found some issues I would like to discuss.
First, the patch that updates the software to version 1.0.3 (121119-03) was not available on updatemanager itself. I found it on the sunsolve site by accident.
Second, from the 20 patches available for me to install, 19 failed. The ones that needed reboot "succeeded" but upon shutdown they failed one by one. Even though the failure reasons were ok, like there is a newer patch revision already installed, I think updatemanager could handle all this dependency and versioning thing automatically, and suppress these patches from the list of available patches or at least show them with different status.
Third, I am not sure how to use Sun Update Connection on a systematic basis for keeping my system up to date. Should I install all patches available or not? I don't want to lose time reading all patch descriptions to find out which patches are necessary or not. Is there a straightforward way?
Am I missing something or is updatemanager really just falling short of my expectations?
-- Douglas

To repeat a comment I made in another thread, I agree with datique on this. UM should have a way to say "ignore this patch, I don't want it and never want to see it again". Of course, it needs to keep track of any dependencies there may be later on down the road. The example I gave in the other thread involved the GigaSwift update being needed on my Blade 100 at home.
This isn't meant as a gripe, but a suggestion. I realize that UM is a new tool, and many things like this need to be (are?) hammered out with community feedback.
Rainer

Patch updates and preventive maintenance in SAP b1

Dear Experts
Can i get a list of the total patches we have updated so far with the date updated for SAP business one either from SBO or SQL.
Are there any routine checks that we can carry out in SAP B1, like system tests that we can document and keep
Please help
Thanks & Regards
Kanishka Wickrama

Hi,
You may check the list of all released patches can be seen in this following link:
http://channel.sap.com/sbo/patches
You can see all available patch and next patches for still under maintenance SAP B1 version.
For the routine check case, you could install remote support platform in your B1 insallation server. You mau check this following link to know more about RSP:
https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000464462008E
Rgds,
JimM

Bash not available in Software Updates

When checking in software updates for Bash patch, it shows no updates available for either a Mavericks machine or a Mountain Lion machine. Who knows why going through software update doesn't show anything available.
I did get the download at Apple - Support - Downloads (http://support.apple.com/downloads)

I installed update for BASH 1.0 as instructed during support phone calls Saturday - my computer States Successful - BUT I can't find it listed in my updates - should I install BASH update as told by senior advisor yesterday , a second time?

I cannot get an IEEE 1394b camera to work (I've tried the Prosilica patch).

System info: LabVIEW version 8.0, NI-IMAQ for 1394 2.0, Camera = Sony XCD-V50 (IEEE 1394b), Windows XP pro (service pack 2)
Working in Measurement and Automation Explorer, I encountered this:
"Sony 1394 XCD-V50" appears under Devices and Interfaces, but I get this error.
IMAQ error 0xBFF68001
"Cannot load the driver"
I've tried to configure the device by right clicking and selecting the driver "NI-IMAQ IEEE 1394 IIDC Digital Camera". I get this error.
IMAQ error 0xBFF68016
"Insufficient resources available for the required video mode"
I installed the Prosilica "Firewire Fix" utility to re-install service pack 1 firewire drivers to run 1394b at full speed. But the error remains.

Hello,
It sounds like you may have a third party driver associated with your Sony camera. If you installed a Sony driver, please uninstall it. After uninstalling any third party drivers that you may have, please try updating the driver for your camera in the Windows Device Manager. You can do this by selecting Update Driver... from the right-click menu. After updating the driver in the Windows Device Manager, try configuring your device in MAX with both NI IMAQ for IEEE 1394 2.0 and NI IMAQdx if you have both drivers available.
The Prosilica patch should only affect the available transfer speeds. Without the patch, you may select a maximum of 100 Mb/sec. With the patch, you may select up to 800 Mb/sec for 1394b cameras. The patch will not affect the problem loading the driver. You must address the driver problem before the insufficient resources problem.
If you continue to have difficulty using the IMAQ for IEEE 1394 2.0 driver, you may need to uninstall and reinstall the driver. Remember to unplug your Sony camera before starting this process. For more information on Acquiring from Firewire Cameras with National Instruments NI-IMAQdx and Legacy NI-IMAQ for IEEE 1394, please click here. Please let us know if you continue to have difficulties with this issue.
Best Regards,
T. McCarty

Patch for chrome 36 - video

I just installed the patch for chrome 36 ,, but videos on my project still do not work....

mterry wrote:
I've been looking into why Chrome seems to choke on initally loading main.html after login, and I've developed a patch that seems to correct the issue. What's the best method of submitting this patch to the Convergence developers for possible review and inclusion into the product?The developers produced a fix for this issue some time ago. As Chrome is not an officially supported browser the fix has not been included in Convergence 1 patches however the fix is available with the upcoming Convergence 2 release.
Please note however that Chrome is (and will remain) an officially unsupported browser. If official Chrome browser support is important to you I suggest you raise the following enhancement request with your Sun/Oracle account manager:
RFE#6940556 - "Support for Google Chrome browser"
Regards,
Shane.

Patch for 7.10

Hi,
is there an patch for GUI 7.10.
Where can i find it. I haved looked und SAP Download, but i can't
find anything.
Regards, Dieter

Hi
Check note - 578944 Expected release dates for SAP GUI for Windows & ITS patches
Patch level 1 for 7.10 GUI is expected to ship in week 13. usually the patches are released in the end of the week, so around March 30, patch level 1 should be available from service.sap.com/swdc.

KB3046049 does not patch Freak on Windows 7 machine

I have a stand alone laptop running Windows 7. It has downloaded and installed all patches released this week, including KB3046049, but IE is still vulnerable
according to the freakattack site. I have rebooted and checked to ensure the patch is installed--to no avail. Suggestions welcome.

Hi,
This Windows Updates is applied to Windows 7 SP1. Please try to download and install manually for test.
You could get it from below address:
Security Update for Windows 7 (KB3046049)
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=46258
If it still cannot be installed, please refer to this guide to troubleshoot:
Troubleshoot problems with installing updates
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows/troubleshoot-problems-installing-updates#1TC=windows-7
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

PATCH 9.2.0.4 AVAILABLE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for