Patch Applied Not Reflecting

Hi,
We applied patch 3218526 :Web Applications Desktop Integrator,
But when we give the below it showing as below:
But SQL> select t.application_name , i.patch_level,i.LAST_UPDATE_DATE,i.PRODUCT_VERSION from fnd_product_installations i, fnd_application_vl t where i.application_id = t.application_id and i.patch_level like '11i.BNE%';
APPLICATION_NAME
PATCH_LEVEL LAST_UPDATE_DAT PRODUCT_VERSION
Web Applications Desktop Integrator
11i.BNE.C 26-OCT-04 11.5.0
Its not getting updated to 11i.BNE.D
What could be wrong anyone pls help...?
Thanks,
Praveen

Forms 6.0 (Form Compiler) Version 6.0.8.27.0 (Production)
You have applied Patch 4948577 (Developer 6i Patch 18).
But in the ad_bugs and ad_applied_patches its not reflecting the patch number ?
This is an expected behavior. Patch 4948577 is Developer 6i Patch 18, and it will not be listed in ad_bugs and ad_applied_patches (Remember you did not use adpatch to apply this patch).

Similar Messages

Patch Level not reflecting in Support Package Levels after applying

Hello,
MDM_TECH 555_700 patch 01 are applied to A65. But the patch is not
getting reflected in the package level.
We are still unable to view the component in OCS queue, even after
uploading the component. Still the MDM_TECH 555_700 is showing
the patch level 0.
Please provide any solution to make the patch level reflect.
Thanks & Regards
Vijay

Hi Chaitanya,
I'm facing the same issue. We are upgrading Solution Manager 7.0 to EHP1. I cannot implement the Notes 791984 , 1015068 and 1022755 since the OCS is locked with the error in DDIC_Activation. Could you please let me know how did you implement the corrections?
Cheers,
Savitha

I tried to update to 3.6.14 but it was unable to install the update & tried a complete update with "patch apply failed" as a result. it is not listed in the 'unistall program" area of my Windows Vista. how do I uninstall and reinstall Firefox?

I have no other issues withmy computer as I have used PC's for years and am quite familar with their operation. teh questions pretty much says it. After attempting to updat firefox is totally unreliable shuttign down eityher after a few seconds or a few minutes never longer. I curently have version 3.6.13 and the update for 3.6.14 will not install due to a " patch apply failure" as mentioned. I have Windows vista currently and use firefox for the online assignments I do with school, least amount of compactablity issues.

Hi NWL1,
Thanks for the question. If I understand correctly, the iPhone won't update and is stuck. I would recommend that you read this article, it may be able to help you resolve or isolate the issue.
If you can't update or restore your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch - Apple Support
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Have a great day,
Mario

File in patch is not known Oracle Applications file while applying 3480000

Hi,
While applying 11.5.10.2 maintenance pack 3480000 on an 11.5.9 instance we got the following error:
AutoPatch error:
File in patch is not a known Oracle Applications file:
'bne conf example.txt'
Reply me ASAP

Check Note: 461836.1 - Applying 11.5.10.2 Patch 3480000 Errors With "File in patch is not a known Oracle Applications file: Bne Conf Example.Txt."
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=461836.1

E Recruitment -Candidate applied for job but not reflected candidate name

E Recruitment
Candidate applied for job but not reflected candidate name Recruiter Dashboard
Please any one suggests me what is problem?
Regards
Eshwar

Hello Sri,
the solution to your first question might be very easy. In EhP 4 the entries in the dashboard do not appear automatically. In most cases you have to refresh the dashboard (be aware this is only effecting the current dashboard work list, not all if you do not use the refresh all button). Soclick the "My new Applications" and then refress this workset.
If this does not help we will have to look closer into this issue (overall I assume you have EhP4 SP 6 applied).
For question 2. It is a quite common requirement that an external publication is nearly only based on the posting texts while the internal publication includes much more specific information (org. management, cost center, pay scale group). As you are free in designing you own company specific internal and external publications they can look however you want (in the general restriction what a smartform can do of course). For different publication texts companies create different postings one for internal and one for external publication. The additional information are in some cases entered directly into these texts, in some cases maintained in e-rec fields not needed for other requirements, in customer own fields or directly gathered from the HR core system. It depends a bit on the exact requirement which is the best solution. For the fields you mentioned I'd probably go for OM integration for e-rec (assigning positions to requisition) and get the Information via customer RFC function module directly in the smartform (if the security guys allow the access to the HR system from the e-rec system).
For question 3. The manager should be able to see the decision maker data overview. Here you can include whatever you want as you can replace it with a customer developed smartform.
Kind Regards
Roman

The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed) this keeps happening after it has told me to update Why ?

while running Firefox it comes on the screen saying security update so after it ties to update this comes on the screen "The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)" I am running Firefox 6.0 and don't seem to have any other issues with it but it asks me several times to do this update but still says it cant do it
I am running windows vista

If files already have been downloaded then remove the files in the updates and updates\0 folder.
You can also delete the active-update.xml file.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
Software Update not working properly:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update
* C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates

Endpoint policy is applied but client not reflecting settings

Hi
We have setup SCCM 2012 SP1 (post the 2012 SP1 republish) and i'm having issues with the SCEP policy applying.
Basically the policies are setup within the config manager console and are distributing out to the clients, the config manager console displays the correctly assigned policy and discovering the various policies applid via checking registry or powershell
commands also reflects this from the client end.
the endpointprotectionagent.log is telling me that the EPAMPolicy.xml policy has been successfully applied and the contents of EPAMPolicy.xml correctly reflects the settings i have defined via config manager.
yet when i open the actual client it does not reflect any of these settings and appears to just have the default settings.
any suggestions?

Hi,
I don't know if you managed to resolve this. But I had similar issues and after some detective work this was being caused by another group Group policy setting preventing the processing of local group policies. Specifically, the offending setting and explanation
is listed below:
Setting Path:
Computer Configuration/Administrative Templates/System/Group Policy
Setting: Turn off Local Group Policy objects processing: Enabled
Explanation
This policy setting prevents Local Group Policy objects (Local GPOs) from being applied.
By default, the policy settings in Local GPOs are applied before any domain-based GPO policy settings. These policy settings can apply to both users and the local computer. You can disable the processing and application of all Local GPOs to ensure that only
domain-based GPOs are applied.
If you enable this policy setting, the system will not process and apply any Local GPOs.
If you disable or do not configure this policy setting, Local GPOs will continue to be applied.
Note: For computers joined to a domain, it is strongly recommended that you only configure this policy setting in domain-based GPOs. This setting will be ignored on computers that are joined to a workgroup.
Make sure the setting is either set to disable or not configured.
The image below shows a RSoP on a computer where policies are applying successfully. As you can see, antimalware settings are being applied as local group policy settings
Hope this helps

Cpu Patch was not successfully applied

i am applying cpu patch for 10105 versoin on AIX and getting this error while running opatch apply , any suggestion?
32/libnnz10.a/x931rand.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libnnz10.a/nzdac.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libnnz10.a/nzdac.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libnnz10.a/nzpkcs11.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libnnz10.a/nzpkcs11.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libclient10.a/kpuex.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libclient10.a/kpuex.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libclient10.a/kpuf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libclient10.a/kpuf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libclient10.a/kpusp.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libclient10.a/kpusp.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libclient10.a/kpuex.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libclient10.a/kpuex.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libclient10.a/kpuf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libclient10.a/kpuf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libclient10.a/kpusp.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libclient10.a/kpusp.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcs.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcs.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcpi4.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcpi4.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libgeneric10.a/kgl.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libgeneric10.a/kgl.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcdl.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libgeneric10.a/qcdl.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libgeneric10.a/kgl2.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libgeneric10.a/kgl2.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcs.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcs.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcpi4.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcpi4.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libgeneric10.a/kgl.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libgeneric10.a/kgl.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcdl.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libgeneric10.a/qcdl.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libgeneric10.a/kgl2.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libgeneric10.a/kgl2.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcbur.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcbur.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcdrv.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcdrv.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcpip.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttcpip.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttccdf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/ttccdf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libcommon10.a/kpccap.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libcommon10.a/kpccap.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcbur.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcbur.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcdrv.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcdrv.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcpip.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/ttcpip.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/ttccdf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/ttccdf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libcommon10.a/kpccap.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libcommon10.a/kpccap.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/rdbms/lib/libdbtools10.a/impdrv.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/rdbms/lib/libdbtools10.a/impdrv.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/rdbms/lib/libdbtools10.a/impdta.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/rdbms/lib/libdbtools10.a/impdta.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxs10.a/drz.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxs10.a/drz.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexqc.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexqc.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexu.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexu.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexp.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexp.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drext.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drext.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drft.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drft.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexo.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexo.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexr.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexr.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctxc10.a/drexrr.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctxc10.a/drexrr.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctx10.a/drsug.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctx10.a/drsug.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctx10.a/drdm.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctx10.a/drdm.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctx10.a/drpa.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctx10.a/drpa.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libctx10.a/drpn.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libctx10.a/drpn.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdidx.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdidx.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdiorby.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdiorby.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrcr.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrcr.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrjn.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrjn.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdpridx.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdpridx.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdsam.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdsam.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdgr.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdgr.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdg.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdg.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhf.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhf.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhand.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhand.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhor.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhor.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhxor.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdhhxor.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrcnc.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdrcnc.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdsph.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libordsdo10.a/mdsph.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libnls10.a/slms.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libnls10.a/slms.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libnls10.a/slms.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libnls10.a/slms.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libxml10.a/lpxenc.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libxml10.a/lpxenc.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib32/libxml10.a/lpxenc.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib32/libxml10.a/lpxenc.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libaurora.a/joevm.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libaurora.a/joevm.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libaurora.a/joethread.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libaurora.a/joethread.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/libaurora.a/eoactx.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/libaurora.a/eoactx.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/xstabfun.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/xstabfun.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/xstfrc.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/xstfrc.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpdsm.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpdsm.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpecm.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpecm.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpmod.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/olpmod.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/xsoqhelp.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/xsoqhelp.o"
Comparing "/oracle/4dba/8836540/files/lib/liboraolap10.a/xsoqftbl.o" and "/oracle/product/oid10g/.patch_storage/verify/lib/liboraolap10.a/xsoqftbl.o"
There are 1 issues copying files to Oracle Home.
FILE PROBLEM: some files are not patched.
OPATCH_JAVA_ERROR: Patch was not successfully applied.
Verification of the patch failed.
ERROR: OPatch failed as verification of the patch failed.

Make sure you run /usr/sbin/slibclean as root after shutting down everything in the Oracle Home and before running opatch.

Cannot update Mozilla. It says "The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)"

When updating Mozilla, I get this message:
"The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)".
What should be done?

With that one, I'd try updating using a .dmg installer downloaded from the Apple Website:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/

Patch Level 8 Not Reflected in CSADMIN

Hi Experts,
I've just patched my content server 6.4 running on x86-64bit with patch level 8.
However, CSADMIN trx code as well as url are still showing patch level 7 !
Why patch level 8 is not reflected there?
appreciate any hints ..
Rgds,
Sheikh

> With other words: should always ABAP stack SPS be equal to SPS of Java stack within SAP Solution Manager?
yes - in doublestack installation the patchlevels must be in sync. The Java part may rely on the ABAP or vice versa.
Markus

The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)

The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)
Stuck on FF4.0. Update to 5.0 fails to install.

Ok I'll try that when I have time. TYVM I think your right, it should work.
Just haven't been to worried about it as 4.0 is doing ok with me. But I may as well get the newer version huh?

Update failed...could not be installed (patch apply failed) - I use 7.0.1

Update failed. The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed). It appears to want to upgrade from 7.0.1 to 8. But when I click the link, it does not offer updates, just an entire strip/reinstall! Where is the updates page? Help?

Thank you. I don't want to reload the entire thing - yes, it can be entirely reloaded, but I don't want to lose settings. How do I upload the PATCH as offered?

Find out patch applied or not

Hi All,
Please some one help me how to find below the patches applied or not.
Patch 11i.CAC.B
Patch 11i.ALR.G
11i.JTA.F
AME PATCH :DELIVERY OF GA AND RULE PRIORITY FUNCTIONALITY.
I need urgent Please help me.
Thanks...

Hi,
You can run below query to find out specific patch number:
select bug_id, bug_number from ad_bugs where bug_number='&no.';Also you can find out using OAM > Sitemap > Maintenance > Applied Patches - here search for specific patch
You can see all applied patches in you env using patchset.sh utility
Refer:
*Oracle Applications Current Patchset Comparison Utility - patchsets.sh [ID 139684.1]*
thanks,
X A H E E R

Changes made in BOM are not reflected in Configurator.

Hi all,
When i update minimum and maximum quantities in BOM, the new values are not reflected in the configurator.
I have found a patch (patch# 4410573) for this issue in metalink and applying that patch did not resolve the issue.
I have logged an SR with Oracle for this and Oracle support have asked me to run "Refresh Single Configuration Model" concurrent program and see if the changes are reflected.
This program has 2 parameters one for folder and the other for Configuration Model Id.
When i try to run the program, for any of the folders, the value set for the parameter Configuration Model Id does not show any values and hence i am unable to run the program.
We don't have a separate instance for COnfigurator.
Do i need to do any set up so that my Configuration model is reflected in the LOV?
Can anyone please help me on this?
Oracle Apps version: 11.5.10.2
Configuration software build: 11.5.10.25.43A
Regards,
Sreekanth

Hi Jason,
Please see my comments below
Jason said*
Support is correct. If you haven't run the Refresh a Single Configuration Model concurrent program for your model, then the new BOM attributes will not be visible in your model. Changes to items/BOMs are not directly reflected in the configuration model. You must "refresh" the model to see the changes.*
Even without running the "Refresh a Single Configuration Model" concurrent program, in some scenarios, changes are being reflected in Configurator.
Ex:
When i change only minimum and maximum quantities, the changes i.e. new minimum and maximum values are not reflected in Configurator.
But, when i also change any of the following fields along with minimum and maximum quantities, new values are being updated in Configurator with out running the refresh program.
effectivity_date, disable_date, component_quantity, planning_factor, component_yield_factor and optional class
Can you please explain this?
Also, i have already tried executing the query by commenting the enclosing_folder check. But still, the query is not retrieving any records.
Basically, the sub-query that fetches devl_project_id itself is not retrieving any records.
Jason said:+
Based on the SQL above, the only criteria for importing a model is that the item under the folder must be:+
a. A Model (PRJ = Project)+
b. The Model cannot be deleted (Deleted_flag must be '0')+
c. And the model must have been imported from Oracle apps, e.g. it cannot be a non-BOM model (orig_sys_ref is not null)+
Can you please tell how can i check whether model is imported into configurator or not and if it is imported from where is it imported?
Regards,
Sreekanth
Edited by: Sreekanth Munagala on May 12, 2011 8:52 AM

MS11-061 still vulnerable after patch applied

I have a Windows 2008 R2 Server serving as an RDS gateway. We also use Qualys to do vulnerability scanning. Qualys is still reporting: Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Web Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (MS11-061).
This server is fully patched. I have looked through all patches applied and I see where KB2546250 has been applied. If I try to apply it again I just get a pop up that says it is already there. I need to get rid of this entry on my Qualys
report for audit purposes. What could be the problem? Thanks
Tony G

What could be the problem?
The problem... most likely... is that Qualsys is WRONG. If the machine is fully patched, then there's not much else you can do to the machine, eh? You wanna get rid of the entry.. call Qualsys and have 'em prove why they're right.
Why do people automatically assume that a third-party scanner is more accurate than the native tools that come from the OS vendor who supplies the OS patches?
Yes, by all means, use a third-party scanner! The purpose of a third-party scanner is to find stuff you've MISSED. But if you know for a fact that you've not missed anything, then don't let the third-party scanner waste hours of your time trying to
prove a negative.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Patch Applied Not Reflecting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for