Patch installation EP 6.0 SP9 issues

Hi ,
During the installation of EP which has been installed as follows
-Oracle 9.2.0.6
-SAP Web AS 6.4 SR1 . (Only central instance and the database instance
with no seperate dialog instances)
-EP 6.0 SP9 SR1
-KMC
The SAP note 766765 mentioned in the guide "EP60SP9Install_SR1_v5.pdf"
asks me to install the patch for KMC which later on directs me to
"NW_SP_STACK09_109.pdf" the support package guide for SP09 .
In the section "2 Support Package Stack 09" under the heading "2.1 List
of Required Support Packages" of this guide it gives me a list of support
packages . I have downloaded the required packages for the technical
scenario "SAP enterprise portal" . They are for Web AS , Portal
paltformand KMC and I assume that I have to install all of them . Now I
go to the
section "4.4 SAP Web AS Java" which is on page 62 of the guide .Here
under the section "4.4.2 Preparation" it says the following
" If Portal Platform and Knowledge Management and Collaboration (KMC) are
running on your Web AS Java, apply KMC Patch 2 for SAP NetWeaver '04
Support Package Stack 05 before patching this Web AS Java. For more
information, see SAP Note 772515.
While typically patches are included in the next support package, in this
case you must install Patch 2 for KMC prior to applying the Support
Package Stack to Web AS Java. "
ISSUE 1 : When I check for the SAP note 772515, the service marketplace
says "Note 772515 is not released." Now I am stuck with the
installationas I don't know where to find the KMC Patch 2 and secondly
what relevantinformation I will be missing about this patch( let's say Ifind the
patch myself ) , if I intend to ignore the inexistance of SAP note 772515 .
In the section "4.4.2 Preparation" of the support package stack guide
SP09 under the heading "Windows only" it says in the "Action"
"Make sure that SAP MMC and the Microsoft Service Management Console
are not running."
ISSUE 2 : If this is what I do then I cannot install the patch because
during the intial information capture with SAPINST it validates the
userpwd for the user DDIC . For this it needs to establish the RFC
conectionwhich it cannot , as the MMC is down . Similarily it does for
the J2EE
engine parameters and this will not happen again as the MMC is down .
Now I am not sure if I keep the MMC running and start with the patch
installation , what damage will I cause to the already installed system
I need your help in the above mentioned issues asap as the delay in the
installation will effect the delivery schedule of the project .

Hi Deepak,
> I need your help in the above mentioned issues
> asap as the delay in the installation will effect
> the delivery schedule of the project .
If that is so, please open an OSS message to SAP. There is no guaranteed answering time in SDN.
Regards,
Karsten

Similar Messages

  • Every PATCH installation fails after installing Windows Updates

    Hello,
    I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
    Here is the test case:
    1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
    2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
    3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
    4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
    msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
    5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
    6. install the v1.0.1 patch
    RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
    NOTES:
    1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
    2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
    Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
    Thx,
    Daniel

    Hello,
    I want to report an issue which I think is a Windows bug introduced by one of the Windows updates (unfortunately I wasn't able to find out which one of them).
    Here is the test case:
    1. install a fresh copy of Windows on a test machine
    2. install all available Windows Updates (so the system is up to date)
    3. create a sample MSI installer which only installs some dummy files (let's say Product Version 1.0.0) and host it on a web server
    4. install the MSI from the online location using a command line like this:
    msiexec /i http://server/share/package.msi
    5. create a .MSP patch (e.g. v1.0.1) which only adds a new file to v1.0.0
    6. install the v1.0.1 patch
    RESULT: the patch installation fails with the following error message: "The filename , directory name , or volume label syntax is incorrect"
    NOTES:
    1. the issue was replicated on Windows 7 and 8 machines UP TO DATE
    2. the issue is not replicated on a fresh installation of Windows without Updates applied
    Is there anyone aware of what could cause this error? Once again the patch installation fails only on Windows machines with the latest Updates installed.
    Thx,
    Daniel

  • Ciscowork 3.2.1 daemon manager is not working after patch installation

    Hi Team
    Ciscowork 3.2.1 daemon manager is not working after patch installation.
    C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>net start crmdmgtd
    The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service is starting.
    The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service could not be started.
    The service did not report an error.
    More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 3534.
    Also I checked syslog.log and it is showing below error
    an 17 14:39:34 127.0.0.1 100: <28>   dmgt[1316]: 2507(W):Daemon manager anonymous user has not been set up: 00000569
    Please suggest.
    With Regards,
    neena

    During installation, an user casuser is created with certian security settings and if those are modified\removed, DM will not start.
    Following message will be seen in /log/syslog.log
    Daemon manager anonymous user has not been set up: 00000775
    To solve the issue, run resetcasuser.exe located under /setup.support  to  recreate the settings.
    Make sure casuser account is not locked out. Make sure casuser is a member of casusers group and is set to "password never expires".
    Additionally you can try to make casuser a member of adiministrators group.
    -Thanks

  • Windows 7 X86 Update patch installation failed ("Updateshandler.log - Update execution failed")

    Hi,
    I am using SCCM 2007 R3 at client site, Since from Jan 2015 and for Feb 2015 also i am facing a problem in Windows 7 32bit OS Patch installation failure on Client PC. I am creating a bundle for Windows 7 OS Patch's and targeting these monthly patches to
    windows 7 Collection having X86 and X64 bit OS.
    From All the Deployed Patches only X64 bit Win 7 PC's are getting successfully Update.
    BUT on all X86(32Bit) win 7 OS there was Installation Failed Error. The UPDATES are getting successfully downloaded in CACHE folder on client PC's but while installation they are getting failed. I have tried reinstalling SCCM Client on PC but problem persists.
    Checked number of forum's and done WUA re-installtion  as well, Tried downloading new patches for win7 32 bit and deployed again, but no +ve result. WSUS reconfigured and reinstalled and approved all patches again, again no solution.
    Updates for all other OS's Like Win 8, 8.1 Server 2003,2008 and 2012 for X86 and C64 all working fine.
    Updateshandler.log Giving :---- Update execution failed.
    MP DP and all other roles are working fine with SUP role reinsalled.
    Tried:-
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/bb932189.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sudheesn/archive/2010/11/10/troubleshooting-sccm-part-iii-software-updates.aspx
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/c8c8715e-a1f7-4de1-b17f-d3a72c24db6c/updates-not-show-up?forum=configmgrsum
    Please anyone help..
    Regards
    Rajiv.

    1. We have tried downloading patch again & again . Try to push them trough SCCM targeting win7 collection having x-86 & x-64 bit OS.
    2. Tried manual installation of . Cab files also on 10 win 7 x-86 PC's but all failing with error code.0x800706f7. This code shows The stub received bad data. In both cases (manual & SCCM )
    3. Even tried downloading .MSU files for same KB article that also not getting installed
    4. Monitored Windowsupdate.log & DISM.log & CBS.log
    Handler Fatal: CBS called error with 0x800706f7
    warning exit code=0x00000000; call error code=0x80240022
    5. Tried renaming windir/Softwaredeployment folder to windir/Softwaredeployment.log & run SFC /Scannow
    0x800706F7 -2147023113 RPC_X_Bad_Stub_Data This can occur after a control selfupdate that has not fully completed and requires a reboot. The controls may need to be reregistered.
    This seems related to a problem within Windows, and ConfigMgr is not at fault - Windows has a severe issue which is affecting the servicing stack.
    Try CheckSUR.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/roplatforms/archive/2011/04/28/installation-failures-cbs-store-corruptions-uncommon-issues-and-troubleshooting.aspx
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • Toshiba Video Player v5.3.49.124_A-patch installation

    Hi
    I'm trying to install an update to Toshiba Video Player released on February 15th 2015 - version 5.3.49.124_A patch. The problem is, as soon as I try to install it its says that its extracting the file and then an error message appears, "Unable to create file, error 120." Please help in trying to resolve the above error.
    Thank You,
    Inayat

    Hmmmm.... as I can see you don't have original factory settings anymore. In the past I have always installed updates on original OS version and cannot say if Win update is the reason for described issue.
    But original player version is still installed on your machine and works properly, right?
    I mean if everything is OK I think patch installation is not so necessary.

  • I have installed the agent 10 or 15 times and one installation hasfailed, no error appeared during the installation but I am havinginconsistent issues with my ethernet card not working here and there. Werebooted and can log into Novell client but th

    I have installed the agent 10 or 15 times and one installation has failed, no error appeared during the installation but I am having inconsistent issues with my ethernet card not working here and there. We rebooted and can log into Novell client but the login prompt did not appear for ESM client or the icon was not in the systray. Everything seems to work, besides at times (a couple times today) it terminates his ethernet card/connection. I would re-image his computer but he has several applications and it would take several hours, so I am hoping someone has an idea to fix this issue. So I was trying to figure out why he did not get the prompt to login and why it's not in the systray and it appears to not have completed the install? I checked the add/remove programs, its not listed within their, I also checked the registry and found nothing for endpoint within their, but the files are within c:\program files\novell\zenworks endpoint security.
    I have also tried uninstalling it but that fails due to it "not being installed", and it will not reinstall over itself either.
    I did notice that stuninstdrv.exe is running in task manager. Any help would be great...
    Windows xp sp3
    ESM 3.5.154
    Thanks,
    Andy

    If you are searching the registry, check for the "Senforce" string. It should be at HKLM\Software\Senforce
    Try running the install program for the ZSC with the following command line:
    setup.exe /V"STUNINSTALL=1"
    If you've specified an uninstall password, try this one instead:
    setup.exe /V"STUNINSTALL=1 STUIP=password"" (please note the double quote at the end)
    Let me know if that helped you.
    Daniel
    >>>
    From: Andy_DeWees<[email protected] du>
    To:novell.support.zenworks.endpoint-security-management
    Date: 2/5/2009 12:52 PM
    Subject: I have installed the agent 10 or 15 times and one installation hasfailed, no error appeared during the installation but I am havinginconsistent issues with my ethernet card not working here and there. Werebooted and can log into Novell client but the login prompt did not appearfor ESM client or the icon was not in the systray. Everything seems towork, besides at times (a couple times today) it terminates his ethernetcard/connection. I would re-image his computer but he has severalapplications and
    I have installed the agent 10 or 15 times and one installation has failed, no error appeared during the installation but I am having inconsistent issues with my ethernet card not working here and there. We rebooted and can log into Novell client but the login prompt did not appear for ESM client or the icon was not in the systray. Everything seems to work, besides at times (a couple times today) it terminates his ethernet card/connection. I would re-image his computer but he has several applications and it would take several hours, so I am hoping someone has an idea to fix this issue. So I was trying to figure out why he did not get the prompt to login and why it's not in the systray and it appears to not have completed the install? I checked the add/remove programs, its not listed within their, I also checked the registry and found nothing for endpoint within their, but the files are within c:\program files\novell\zenworks endpoint security.
    I have also tried uninstalling it but that fails due to it "not being installed", and it will not reinstall over itself either.
    I did notice that stuninstdrv.exe is running in task manager. Any help would be great...
    Windows xp sp3
    ESM 3.5.154
    Thanks,
    Andy

  • Patch installation failing

    I tried installing 4329444 patch .but it failed giving the following errors
    bash-3.00$ opatch apply
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.1.0
    Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.1.0
    Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
    Oracle Home : /oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g
    Central Inventory : /oracle/app/oracle/oraInventory
    from : /oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g//oui
    Log file location : /oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch-2008_May_20_17-49-49-IST_Tue.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '4329444' to OH '/oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g'
    Interim Patch '4329444' is not applicable to OH '/oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g'... Platforms not compatible
    Apply Session failed: ApplySession failed to prepare the system. OUI-67020:Interim Patch '4329444' is not applicable to OH '/oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g'... Platforms not compatible
    OPatch detects Platform ID 453 while this patch supports the following platforms: [ 23: Sun SPARC Solaris (64-BIT),  ]
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 73
    but I checked up this with the follwing commands
    bash-3.00$ isainfo -vk
    64-bit sparcv9 kernel modules
    bash-3.00$ isainfo -vb
    64-bit sparcv9 applications
    asi_blk_init
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS ardeedb 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
    Sreejesh

    Sorry, but which bit of the error message did you not read:
    "Platforms not compatible
    Apply Session failed: ApplySession failed to prepare the system. OUI-67020:Interim Patch '4329444' is not applicable to OH '/oracle/app/oracle/OracleHomes/oms10g'... Platforms not compatible"

  • Patch installer not overwriting the existing one

    Patch installer not overwriting the existing one
    Hi, for one my LabVIEW application, I have created two installers
    Including all the required additional installers (Installer)
    With no additional installer (patch installer)
    So that, for further versions they can use only patch installer.
    When I try to installer both the installer of same version which created two icons in “Control Panel\Programs\Programs and Features” as shown below.
    When I am installing the second installer (patch), I expected that it will either overwrite the existing or it will not allow me to install. But both didn’t happen.
    Please share your thoughts on the above.
    Thanks in advance
    Phani
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thank you..
    I got another doubt on the same.
    "Upgrade Code" should be same
    1.)For both installers (normal and patch)?
    2.)For all the versions?
    which one is correct in the above two?

  • Ciscowork3.2.1 daemon manager is not working after patch installation

    Ciscowork 3.2.1 daemon manager is not working after patch installation
    Hi Team
    Ciscowork 3.2.1 daemon manager is not working after patch installation.
    C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>net start crmdmgtd
    The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service is starting.
    The CiscoWorks Daemon Manager service could not be started.
    The service did not report an error.
    More help is available by typing NET HELPMSG 3534.
    Also I checked syslog.log and it is showing below error
    an 17 14:39:34 127.0.0.1 100: <28>   dmgt[1316]: 2507(W):Daemon manager anonymous user has not been set up: 00000569
    I reset the casuser password and restarted the service but still no luck....
    Please suggest.
    With Regards,
    neena

    Neena,
    Check the properties of casuser under Start > Settings > Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Computer Management > Local Users and Groups > Users and make sure it is not disabled or locked out.  The only thing checked should be "Password never expires".  Change anything required and reset casuser.

  • 10.1.3.5.0 patch installation

    Hi All,
    I have installed SOA Suite 10.1.3.10 as stand alone installation using oracle lite database. Now I want to install 10.1.3.5.0 pacth set to the existing soa suite.
    Could any one please share me the documentation steps for this. Its bit urgent.
    Any help would be appreciated !
    Regards,
    JK

    Hi JK,
    Could any one please share me the documentation steps for this. Its bit urgent.There would be a ReadMe file with patch installer. It has all the patch installtion steps mentioned in it. You should also refer release notes of 10.1.3.5 -
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14101_01/doc.1013/e15342/toc.htm
    Regards,
    Anuj

  • SCCM Client Installation Error and compmgr service issues

    Hi dudes,
    Hope you all are good. I am getting stuck in SCCM client installation. I have SCCM 2007 R3 setup. It's working perfect but recently getting errors in
    sccm client installation after facing some viruses issues in my environment.
    I search on that error but nothing found any relevant information related
    to the below error. I tried to manually installing the client but getting the error ccmsetup.exe is not a valid 32 bit application :(. Also while trying to start the configmgr service manager in tool box it gives the below snapshot error. Any help relevant
    to the below error very meaningful for me.
    Regards,
    Mohsin

    Hi Jason,
    Thank You for your response. Yes i tried it to manually start the service on client machine but it give the below error, 
    For component service manager, yes we are going forward to the restoration process using VM restore(as sccm is deployed on a VM and we take the full vm backup).
    Regards,
    Mohsin

  • SWSE patch installation from 8.1.1 to 8.1.1.3

    Hi All,
    As part of patch installation I tried to install SWSE. After restarting webserver, siebel application is still showing 8.1.1 current version.
    when I check in SWEapp\public\enu folder I didn't find 21219 folder.
    Actually our environment setup is enterprise server and one server(we have two servers) in one machine and SWSE and another server is in another machine.
    I have followed all combinations, stoping webservers, siebel server and enterprise server and tried to install SWSE patch to show our application to 8.1.1.3. but never 21219 folder is been created?
    Please share your solution.
    Thanks
    Sean

    Hi Sean,
    What are the contents of files below?
    SWEapp\upgrade.txt
    SWEapp\upgrade_enu.txt
    SWEapp\base.txt
    SWEapp\enu.txt
    SIEBEL_ROOT\upgrade.txt
    SIEBEL_ROOT\upgrade_enu.txt
    siebsrvr\enu.txt
    siebsrvr\base.txt
    Also provide the OS platform and version you are using for Siebel Server and SWEapp.
    Thanks,
    Wilson

  • Oracle 10g patche installation

    Dear Friends,
    Very very happy new year.
    We have oracle 10g release 10.2.0.2.0
    DB client lib.     OCI_102 (10.2.0.1.
    DB releases        ORACLE 9.2.0..,
    DBSL version       700.08
    DBSL Patch Level   201
    OS is as below
    Operating system     HP-UX
    Machine type         ia64
    Platform ID          274
    Now we have to apply oracle patches.
    IF any one has done this or having any document , please provide me  and any idea is most welcome

    Hi Dear,
    Thanks fro your reply.
    We are applying the patches but getting the errors as below.
    Please help me.
    MOPatch - Install Multiple Oracle Patches in One Run - 2.1.6.
    Copyright (c) Oracle Corporation 2007-2010. All Rights Reserved.
    Version:       2.1.6
    Revision:      5.1.2.10
    Command-line:  /oracle/DVR/102_64/MOPatch/mopatch.sh
    Oracle Home:   /oracle/DVR/102_64RDBMS version: 10.2.0.2.0
    OPatch version:10.2.0.2.5
    Clean-up:      supportedPSUs:          not supportedLog file:      $ORACLE_HOME/cfgtoollogs/mopatch/mopatch-2011_01_17-17-33-13.logPatch base:    .Patch source:  .Link script:   ./link.shReadmes:       <none>
    Strpd. Readmes:<none>make utility:  /usr/ccs/bin/makeunzip utility: /oracle/DVR/102_64/bin/unzip
    Getting pre-run patch inventory...executing: "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" lsinventory -retry 0 -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc -xml "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir/preinv.xml"
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.2.5Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.Oracle Home       : /oracle/DVR/102_64Central Inventory : /oracle/oraInventory   from           : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.locOPatch version    : 10.2.0.2.5OUI version       : 10.2.0.2.0OUI location      : /oracle/DVR/102_64/ouiLog file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-01-17_17-33-14PM.logLsinventory Output file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/lsinv/lsinventory2011-01-17_17-33-14PM.txt
    Installed Top-level Products (2): Oracle Database 10g            racle Database 10g Release 2 Patch Set 1                            10.2.0.2.0There are 2 products installed in this Oracle Home.Interim patches (45) :
    OPatch failed with error code 74Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9980062"...failed.
    Reason: Cannot apply patch.Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9952230"...(2 of 44)
    executing: "/oracle/DVR/102_64/bin/unzip" -qq -d "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir" "./SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip" "SAP_102051_201012/9952230/*"
    executing: ( cd "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir/stage/SAP_102051_201012/9952230" && "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" apply -silent -no_relink -local -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc )Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.2.5Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home       : /oracle/DVR/102_64Central Inventory : /oracle/oraInventory   from           : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 10.2.0.2.5OUI version       : 10.2.0.2.0OUI location      : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oui
    Log file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-01-17_17-33-30PM.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '9952230' to OH '/oracle/DVR/102_64'
    Interim Patch 9952230 has Conflict with patch(es) [  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 ] in OH /oracle/DVR/102_64
    Conflict patches:   7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355
    Patch(es)  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 conflict with the patch currently being installed (9952230).
    If you continue, patch(es)  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 will be rolled back and the new patch (9952230) will be installed.If a merge of the new patch (9952230) and the conflicting patch(es) ( 7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355) is required, contact Oracle Support Services and request a Merged patch.Do you want to proceed? [y|n]
    N (auto-answered by -silent)User Responded with: NApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: ApplySession exits on requestSystem intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the systemThe following warnings have occurred during OPatch execution:1) OUI-67012:Interim Patch 9952230 has Conflict with patch(es) [  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 ] in OH /oracle/DVR/102_64OPatch failed with error code 74executing: ( cd "./mopatch-22436-8022-_102051_201012/9952230" && "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" apply -force -silent -no_relink -local -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc )
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.2.5Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.Oracle Home       : /oracle/DVR/102_64Central entory : /oracle/oraInventoryfrom           : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 10.2.0.2.5OUI version       : 10.2.0.2.0OUI location      : /oracle/DVR/102_64/ouiLog file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-01-17_17-33-40PM.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '9952230' to OH '/oracle/DVR/102_64'
    Interim Patch 9952230 has Conflict with patch(es) [  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 ] in OH /oracle/DVR/102_64
    Conflict patches:   7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355
    Patch(es)  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 conflict with the patch currently being installed (9952230).
    If you continue, patch(es)  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 will be rolled back and the new patch (9952230) will be installed.If a merge of the new patch (9952230) and the conflicting patch(es) ( 7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355) is required, contact Oracle Support Services and request a Merged patch.
    Do you want to proceed? [y|n]Y (auto-answered by -silent)User Responded with: YRunning prerequisite checks...
    Patch 9952230: Optional component(s) missing : [ oracle.rdbms, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.dbscripts, 10.2.0.5.0 ] Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:Patch is no-op patch.ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    The following warnings have occurred during OPatch execution:
    1) OUI-67012:Interim Patch 9952230 has Conflict with patch(es) [  7237154 6455161 5618049 5531355 ] in OH /oracle/DVR/102_64Patch failed with error code 74Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9952230"...skipped.Reason: Patch conflicts.Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9770451"...(3 of 44)
    executing: "/oracle/DVR/102_64/bin/unzip" -qq -d "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir" "./SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip" "SAP_102051_201012/9770451/*"
    executing: ( cd "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir/stage/SAP_102051_201012/9770451" && "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" apply -silent -no_relink -local -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc )
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.2.5
    Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home       : /oracle/DVR/102_64Central Inventory : /oracle/oraInventory
       from           : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 10.2.0.2.5
    OUI version       : 10.2.0.2.0
    OUI location      : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oui
    Log file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-01-17_17-33-51PM.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '9770451' to OH '/oracle/DVR/102_64'
    Running prerequisite checks...
    Patch 9770451: Optional component(s) missing : [ oracle.rdbms, 10.2.0.5.0 ]
    Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:
    Patch is no-op patch.
    ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 74
    Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9770451"...failed.
    Reason: Cannot apply patch.
    Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9584028"...(4 of 44)
    executing: "/oracle/DVR/102_64/bin/unzip" -qq -d "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir" "./SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip" "SAP_102051_201012/9584028/*"
    executing: ( cd "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir/stage/SAP_102051_201012/9584028" && "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" apply -silent -no_relink -local -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc )
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.2.5
    Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home       : /oracle/DVR/102_64
    Central Inventory : /oracle/oraInventory
       from           : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version    : 10.2.0.2.5
    OUI version       : 10.2.0.2.0
    OUI location      : /oracle/DVR/102_64/oui
    Log file location : /oracle/DVR/102_64/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2011-01-17_17-33-58PM.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '9584028' to OH '/oracle/DVR/102_64'
    Running prerequisite checks...
    Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:
    Patch 9584028: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.rdbms, 10.2.0.5.0 ]
    ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 74
    Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9584028"...failed.
    Reason: Cannot apply patch.
    Processing patch "SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip!9548269"...(5 of 44)
    executing: "/oracle/DVR/102_64/bin/unzip" -qq -d "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir" "./SAP_102051_201012_HPUXIA64.zip" "SAP_102051_201012/9548269/*"
    executing: ( cd "./mopatch-22436-8022-tmpdir/stage/SAP_102051_201012/9548269" && "/oracle/DVR/102_64/OPatch/opatch" apply -silent -no_relink -local -invPtrLoc /oracle/DVR/102_64/oraInst.loc )
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.2.5
    Regards
    Ganesh Datt Tiwari

  • Ongoing issue: Error 1321 during the patch installation

    I have seen this issue with 10x and 11x, however currently I'm working on 11. You can look at my previous posts to see additional details because I have posted about this issue in the past with no luck on obtaining a good answer. Luckily I now have more details and pinpointed the issue down to only patches. When installing a patch, the msp and Mcafee On Access scanner conflict because On Access scanner is scanning the file the same time the msp is attempting to modify the file, this results in the msp reporting Error 1321 (security permissions error). This has only been seen on Windows XP. I have never seen this occur when installing the main Adobe Reader installation, only on patches (msp's) and in this specific case it's the 11.0.03 patch. The obvious solution here is disabling Mcafee On Access scanner (which I have confirmed resolves the issue) however that is not an option in my environment. We refuse to leave the machines vulnerable during an installation. A case was opened with Mcafee and their engineers could find nothing that Mcafee was doing out of the ordinary and could find nothing proving Mcafee was doing anything incorrect on their side, they have requested Adobe look into this issue to find root cause. The bad news is that Adobe Reader is a free product therefore there is no premier support that I am aware of, which leaves me with this forum. This does not happen for other installations as often as it does for the Adobe Reader patches. It does not happen every time the patch is installed but it happens very often and the file reported with issues is different every time. My question is, does Adobe have any thoughts on why this could be happening so often for their patches (msp's)? Is there something being done out of the ordinary? Please feel free to let me know if any additional details are needed.

    Hi,
    The installer launches the MSI engine. From that point on, interactions between the MSI engine, the system, and other processes (all of which are not under Adobe's control) control the installation workflow--these processes include antivirus and backup programs. Adobe has worked with certain software companies to mitigate such issues, but in this case it may be true that both Mcafee and Adobe are doing the right thing and that it's up to the admin to make them play together nicely. 
    Obviously, the reason this is not always an issue is because Mcafee is not always scanning in-play files. The coincidence of time and files is seldom, and so the problem appears sporadic.
    You must temporarily suspend scanning or keep retrying until success.
    hth,
    b

  • Patch installation issue on ACS 5.1

    Hi,
    I have one ACS server (5.1) in the Dev environment. I am trying to install the patch 5-1-0-44-6 before upgrading to 5.3. When I try to install the patch, the server doesn't do anything, after few hours, I dodn't see any changes on the server. Here is my version info:
    Cisco ACS VERSION INFORMATION
    Version : 5.1.0.44
    Internal Build ID : B.2347.EVAL
    If anybody experinced the same problem or know how to solve this issue, please share.
    Thanks!

    I have managed to bind the certificate now. I went to check the link given to me by the CA and found two certificates, one in PKCS#7 and X509 format. I tried the X509 format and the ACS successfully binded it.
    It works but I want to know how it all works.PKCS#7 includes the Intermediate CA while X509 doesn't. The X509 certificate comes with a message stating that Intermediate CA needs to be installed seperately. I have found it and can install it, but what is it used for? I also found the CA certificate. So there is three certificate, CA, Intermediate CA and X509. How does it all come together, or does anyone have a link on a good guide on how it works?
    I am trying to configure wireless authentication using PEAP-MSCHAPv2 using Cisco WLC, ACS as RADIUS server and Windows AD as the database. Is there anything I need to know about certificates in this deployment?

Maybe you are looking for