Patches esso LM and PG versions 10.1.4.1

Hi
I have currently implemented Esso version 10.1.4.1 for about 6 months now. I have not applied any patches to the software as yet.
1. Is the applying of the patches safe ???
2. Have their been any problems after applying the patches ???
And could someone provide me with the patch number for the first patch for the Esso Provisioning Gateway 10.1.4.1 please as I couldn't find this on the knowledge base?
Thanks
Minesh

user8972830 wrote:
Hi
I have currently implemented Esso version 10.1.4.1 for about 6 months now. I have not applied any patches to the software as yet.
1. Is the applying of the patches safe ???
2. Have their been any problems after applying the patches ???
And could someone provide me with the patch number for the first patch for the Esso Provisioning Gateway 10.1.4.1 please as I couldn't find this on the knowledge base?
Thanks
Minesh1. Patches are cumulative updates to the package. Usually, this does not require a re-install of the ESSO components, just application of a Patch file to update the files. Is it safe? Yes, the patches are tested pretty thoroughly prior to being released.
2. As with all patches, the changes have the potential to cause issues, but in my experience, patching has not caused any serious errors moving forward.
For PG 10.1.4.1, try the following patch to get up to the latest version: Patch 9526209
Please note when upgrading your 10.1.4.1 ESSO-LM client, that you must first replace it with FP01 before upgrading to newer FP's, such as FP04. Here is the note from Patch 9309031
"If starting with LM version 10.1.4.1 then first apply the LM version 10.1.4.1 FP01 (patch 8641770)."
As always, its a good idea to read the readme for specific instructions on installing patches.

Similar Messages

Patch Set Updates and the version number

Oracle document 854428.1, Patch Set Updates (PSUs) for Oracle Products, has this to say about the version number:
2.3 Baseline Version for Easier Tracking
Oracle associates a version number to the patch. The fifth number of the database version is incremented for each PSU. For example, the initial PSU is version 11.1.0.7.1, the second PSU for Release 11.1.0.7 is 11.1.0.7.2, and so on.
My DBAs just told me that they applied PSU3 to our database, which had version number 11.2.0.2.0. I checked the version number after the PSU was applied, but it is still the same:
SQL> select version from v$instance;
VERSION
11.2.0.2.0
Do the PSUs change the fifth number in the version or not?

SQL> select comments from sys.registry$history where action_time > sysdate - 1
COMMENTS
PSU 11.2.0.2.3
Thankyou, that answers my question. The fifth number in the version column of the v$instance view does not seem to change when a PSU is applied. However, the sys.registry$history view has a record of the PSU with the correct fifth number in the version.

Need latest SLD and NWDI version for PI 7.1 EHP1

Can any one update me the latest SLD and NWDI version for PI 7.1 EHP1?
Kindly provide me the path of implementation guides for SLD, NWDI which can be used with PI 7.1 EHP1. For PI 7.1 EHP1, can we use the same version of SLD and NWDI which used IN PI 7.1?
Please help me for the above questions.
Regards,
Yuvaraj.

Hi Yuvaraj,
Please check the NWDI Development Infrastructure 7.11 and SLD 7.11 for the PI 7.1 EHP1.
Go to Service Market Place - Software Download > Support Packages and Patches > Support Packages and Patches - Entry by Application Group > SAP NetWeaver and complementary products > SAP NETWEAVER PI > SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW PI 7.1 >Entry by Component > Development Infrastructure.
Hope it will helps
Regards
Arun Jaiswal

Is it possible to patch Global Zone and only specific Non-Global Zones?

Hi Champs,
Is it possible to patch Global Zone and only specific Non-Global Zones? Idea is to patch DEV-zones only on the system & test applications and then patch only the STG-zones on same server!
Not sure if it is possible but just throwing a question...
Cheers,
Nitin

M10vir wrote:
Yes, if you have branded (non-sparse) zone!Branded zones and sparse zones don't have the relation that you imply. In Solaris 10, native zones can be sparse or whole-root (non-sparse, as you say). Zones that are not native zones are branded zones. Branded zones on Solaris 10 include Solaris Legacy Containers, previously known as Solaris 8 Containers and Solaris 9 Containers. That add-on product allows you to run Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 application environments under a thin layer of virtualization provided by the brands framework. solaris8 and solaris9 branded zones can be patched independently of each other and of the global zone.
Solaris 11 has no "native zones" - all zones use the brands framework. The "solaris" brand does no emulation and in that respect is very similar to native zones on Solaris 10. Solaris 11 also provides Solaris 10 Zones via the solaris10 brand. This allows zones or the global zone from a Solaris 10 system to be transferred to a Solaris 11 system and run as solaris10 zones. When running on Solaris 11, solaris10 zones can each be patched independently from each other and the Solaris 11 global zone. Technically, Solaris 11 doesn't have patches - it just has newer versions of packages to which the system is updated.

ACS Fixup Patch not found and Installation Process

Hi Experts,
In my association there is some issue going on with CSACS Device, they have suggested us to upgrade the patch as below..
1) ACS 4.2.0.124.9-Fix (Patch:4.2.0.124.9)
2) ACS-4.2.0.124-9-CSUpdate Fix (Patch:4.2.0.124.9)
3) ACS 4.2.0.124.10-Fix ( Patch : 4.2.0.124.10)
4) ACS-4.2.0.124.10-CSUpdate Fix ( Patch:4.2.0.124.10)
i tried to download it from cisco.com but i am not able to found anywhere in cisco.com
also please let me know the procedure for applying the patch in ACS..
the expert was saying that you also need to upgrade some remote agent in system where you configured..
please let me know patch installation procedure and from where i can download it. do i need to open a TAC with cisco for this ?
i have attachted my current version sc
Regards,
Vivek

Hello Vivek,
You can download the requested files from Cisco.com > Support > All Downloads > Products > Security > Identity Management > Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine > Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine 4.2 > Secure Access Control Server (ACS) Solution Engine-4.2.0.124
ACS 4.2.0.124 latest patch right now is Patch 17. Also, there is version 4.2.1.15 available for both the ACS SE and Remote Agent (For Windows Authentication). If you are going to patch your ACS SE it would be recommended to either upgrade to the latest patch (17) or to 4.2.1.15.
Patches are cummulative as well so applying patch 10 will include Patch 9 fixes as well. You would be looking for:
1) applAcs_4.2.0.124.10.zip
2) applAcs_4.2.0.124.10-CSUpdate.zip
3) Acs-4.2.0.124.10-RA.zip
You need to apply applAcs_4.2.0.124.10-CSUpdate.zip first and then applAcs_4.2.0.124.10.zip on the ACS SE. On the Remote Agent you will install Acs-4.2.0.124.10-RA.zip.
Both the applAcs_4.2.0.124.10.zip and Acs-4.2.0.124.10-RA.zip have a link to the file release notes which include the patch installation instructions.
You can also review the following:
Appliance Upgrade and Patches Procedure
NOTE: A Cisco CCOiD is required to access software downloads.

Getting PAR version and Kernel version with support level stack in Java

We want collect support information with a portal htmlb Java application (JspDynPage).
We need the versions of deployed PAR files and the version of the installed kernel with the installed support level stack.
Please help to get this information.

Rich,
Go to http://service.sap.com/swdc
Choose:
1. SAP Support Packages
2. Entry by Application Group
3. SAP NetWeaver
4. SAP NETWEAVER
5. Select your release (for example SAP NETWEAVER 04)
6. Entry by Component
7. Developer Studio
8. SAP NW Developer Studio 2.0
9. Win32
10. Select the version of NWDS you'd like to download: JIDE<SP><>.SAR (for example JIDE09_1-10002804.SAR, which is SP09 patch 1)
You'll need to download SAPCAR.EXE to extract the SAR file. You can find this by choosing Additional Components in step 3. After extraction you can install the software.
Kind regards,
Pascal

SOA Suite version and jDevelopr version

Hi,
Do we have to match jDeveloper version and the SOA suite version on which we are working?
I mean If my server is SOA suite 10.1.3.3, then do I have a restriction that I have to use jDeveloper 10.1.3.3 or I can use jDeveloper 10.1.3.4 also it doesn't matter?
Please advice.
Regards,
Sreejit

Hi Sreejit,
Yes, it is a good practice to match the SOA and Jdev versions but not to the extent of trying to match even the patches versions.
For example SOA Suite 10.1.3.1 - 10.1.3.3 is SOA 10 g Realease 3 and so is Jdev 10.1.3.0 - 10.1.3.4 10g Release 3 so any one is fine.
Patches become significant while developing processes in production otherwise it fine.
thanks

Patch 122035-01 and 122857-02

Sendmailpatch cannot be installed because patch 122035-01 fails.
/var/adm/messages:
root: [ID 702911 user.crit] => com.sun.patchpro.util.PatchBundleInstaller@6b62d1 <=Policy does not allow installation of patches. 122035-01
Apr 24 10:00:31 root: [ID 702911 user.error] => Thread[Thread-21,5,main] <=Problem installing patches: CRITICAL: Das Patch 122035-01 macht den Kernel instabil, ist veraltet oder gem�� der Richtlinie unzul�ssig.
is the patch not correct?

i find some issue in SunSolve:
Asset Id:     1-26-101688-1
Title:     Multiple Patching and Packaging Issues for Solaris 10
Synopsis:     Multiple Patching and Packaging Issues for Solaris 10
Update Date:     Fri Apr 07 00:00:00 MDT 2006
Solaris 10 x86 Platform Solaris 10 Note: Solaris 7, 8 and 9 are not affected by this issue. Always install the the latest patch and packaging utility patches before performing installation or removal of other patches or packages. At the time of publication of this document, the following patches address this issue. However, subsequent patches may be developed to address this issue. SPARC Platform Solaris 10 Patch 119254 (Install and Patch Utilities)Patch 119317 (SVr4 Packaging Commands (usr))Patch 119683 (lib/svc/bin/svc.configd)Patch 121297 (fgrep)Patch 122034 (nawk patch) x86 Platform Solaris 10 Patch 119255 (Install and Patch Utilities)Patch 119318 (SVr4 Packaging Commands (usr))Patch 119684 (lib/svc/bin/svc.configd)Patch 121296 (fgrep)Patch 122035 (nawk patch) NOTE: The issue is not fully resolved and additional patches will be addressing the issue. Please install the most current versions of any patch and packaging patches before performing installation or removal of other patches or packages. Customers must always be current with their patch and packaging patches for all releases but this is a special issue for Sol 10 at this time. There are a number of bugs fixed, others are in the works, and others are yet to be worked on. What we have so far: 1. 119254-02 SunOS 5.10: Install and Patch Utilities Patch 119255-02 SunOS 5.10_x86: Install and Patch Utilities Patch /usr/lib/patch/patchadd /usr/lib/patch/patchrm Problem Description: BugID 6233738: patchadd of certain patches in x86 s10 GA fails BugID 5045607: patchadd failed to create backout file without any error BugID 6224767:
Kernel 118855-02
wbr
hans

After I installed the patches, the server and Jdeveloper do not start, Why?

I installed the patch 1,2,3 and mandatory patch 4369818 this afternoon. It showed installing is successful. But after the installing, I do not start the server and Jdeveloper.
05/11/27 22:21:28 java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) This is the server error.
When I start the Jdeveloper, the picture of starting flashed and disappeared. I don't know why. PLS people who know causes reply to me. I will feel grateful to you.

some questions to help us understanding this ssue a little bit better ..
1) what plattform and what versions of jdeveloper and bpel
2) pls run jdev.exe and not jdevw.exe to get a debug window ,, what exception does it show there..
3) is the message you posted the only one you've ssen on the server?
thx clemens

Installing latest Java patches (125136-18 and 125137-18) fails

Hello!
During the installation of the patches 125136-18 and 125137-18 I get this errors on two machines:
Looking for 125136-18 (2/3)
Found patch file
Installing 125136-18 (2/3)
Unzipping patch
Running patchadd
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWj6jmp from directory SUNWj6jmp in patch 125136-18 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWj6jmp will not be applied to the system.
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
125136-18
Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
Checking non-global zones...
This patch passes the non-global zone check.
125136-18
Summary for zones:
Zone ls5ocs
Rejected patches:
None.
Patches that passed the dependency check:
125136-18
Patching global zone
Adding patches...
Checking installed patches...
Installing patch packages...
Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/125136-18.log.11565 for details
Patchadd is terminating.
Failed (exit code 5)
125137 17 < 18 -S- 3 JavaSE 6: update 17 patch (equivalent to JDK 6u17), 64bit
Looking for 125137-18 (3/3)
Found patch file
Installing 125137-18 (3/3)
Unzipping patch
Running patchadd
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
125137-18
Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
Checking non-global zones...
This patch passes the non-global zone check.
125137-18
Summary for zones:
Zone ls5ocs
Rejected patches:
None.
Patches that passed the dependency check:
125137-18
Patching global zone
Adding patches...
Checking installed patches...
Installing patch packages...
Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/125137-18.log.17302 for details
Removing partially installed patch
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Patch patchaddInterrupt does not exist.
Checking patches that you specified for removal.
Done!
Approved patches will be removed in this order:
125137-18
Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
Checking non-global zones...
Cannot lock all zones
Failed to remove partially installed patch.
Verify the integrity of 125137-18 and install it again.
Patchadd is terminating.
Failed (exit code 5)What makes me nervous is the "Failed to remove partially installed patch" message. The logfile of the last patch contains:
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
Installation of <SUNWj6dmx> was successful.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
Installation of <SUNWj6dvx> was successful.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWj6rtx/install/postinstall: /var/tmp/125137-18.SUNWj6rtx: does not exist
pkgadd: ERROR: postinstall script did not complete successfully
Installation of <SUNWj6rtx> failed.Does anyone know what is going on?
TIA
Stephan

I see a similar problem. And, an attempt to install simply via the old patchadd yields:
patchadd 125136-18
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
125136-18
Verifying signed patch <125136-18>...
Verifying digital signature for signer <PATCHSIG>
Digital signature for signer <PATCHSIG> verified.
Verifying contents of signed patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar>
ERROR: File <125136-18/SUNWj6dmo/reloc/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/demo/jni/Poller/PollingServer$Consumer.class> in patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar> has different digest and may have been altered (<NQZKWyaaMi87KLvBwA9YvcXLYqU=> != <LWC5s1PCosd8uLG0WwXn5g+CLdI=>).
ERROR: Signer <PATCHSIG> recorded bad signature for file <125136-18/SUNWj6dmo/reloc/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/demo/jni/Poller/PollingServer$Consumer.class> in patch </var/sadm/spool/125136-18.jar>
ERROR: Unable to verify signature for signer <PATCHSIG>
Signature invalid on signed patch <125136-18>.
Patchadd is terminating.

The upgrade patch cannot be installed by the windows installer service because the program to be upgraded may be missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program

trying to install an update patch for Citrix xendesktop 7.5 and the error when I click on the msi patch is "the upgrade patch cannot be installed by the windows installer service because the program to be upgraded may be missing, or the upgrade patch
may update a different version of the program"
The application was installed 2 days prior and works fine but the patch will not install.
Any ideas?
Wendy2014

Yes let's see if there is any error occurs in installation log.
Meanwhile from the error message, the possible cause is that a part of the application is missing such as a registry key with app version. In this situation you can first test to reinstall/repair the application though it is still working fine - see if issue
persists after reinstall the app.
Meanwhile you could also contact Citrix about this issue. It may be a common issue and Citrix may provide a quick fix for it.
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

So I updated the itunes and now it won't open it, it states a message "the itunes library.itl" cannot be open because it was created by a newer version of itunes, I have unistalled and re-installed newer and older version and still i get this message.

I updated and now i can't use the itunes. I have unistalled several times, installing newer and older versions but still i get this message. Is there anything i can do to fix this problem??

Try the following user tip with that one:
Empty/corrupt iTunes library after upgrade/crash

After installation of latest Bridge and Photoshop version (2014.2.2) *.CR2 files will not be displayed correctly, neither in preview nor in Camera Raw dialog.

After installation of latest Bridge and Photoshop version (2014.2.2) *.CR2 files will not be displayed correctly anymore, neither in preview nor in Camera Raw dialogue.
Some pictures have white squares with blue and red diagonal stripes that cover almost the complete picture.
When opening those files I have the same problem in Camera Raw dailogue and even in Photoshop eventually.
I tried to open the same same pictures on another computer with the same version of Bridge and Photoshop but the problem remains the same.
It seems like the files itselves are still ok, because if you open an explorer window the previews of the pictures are all ok. And the pictures' sizes remain the same.
I tried to clear the cache in both programs but it didn't help.
Has anyone an idea????

First see if a reboot of your PC helps. If not,
Resets may be in order:
Photoshop: Press and hold Control - Shift - Alt immediately upon cold-starting Photoshop. If you get the keys down quickly enough - and you have to be VERY quick - it will prompt you to confirm deletion of your established preferences, which will lead to them all being set to defaults.
Bridge: Start Adobe Bridge and immediately press Ctrl+Alt+Shift (Windows) or Command+Option+Shift (Mac OS) until the Reset Settings dialog box appears. Select all three options--Reset Preferences, Reset Standard Workspaces, and Purge Entire Thumbnail Cache--and then click OK.
Outdated graphics drivers can also cause display problems. Go to your GPU maker's website and be sure you have the latest drivers for your card model.

When I try to load a pdf in iframe and I disable PDF toolbar, Its working fine in Internet Explorer and lower versions of Firefox, but in Firefox 19 its not

When I try to load a PDF inside Iframe and I disable toolar=0 (as guided by adobe). I am able to see the iframe with PDF with no toolbar in IE and lower versions of Firefox (till version 14).
But in my current version 29, The PDF is visible with toolbar on top.
Can you please let me know the way to display pdf with no toolbar in Firefox 29?

I replied on your similar question here: https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1005225

Active and delivery version of ODS

hi
can we check or compare ther delivery version and active version of the infosource.
is there any transaction or table other than RSA1-business content where we can compare objects in infosource.

Hi,
RSIS info source for transaction data
RSOS info source for master data, texts, hierarchies
Regards
Siddhu

Patches esso LM and PG versions 10.1.4.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for