Patching 3.0 to 3.0.1 problem

I'm trying to install the 3.0.1 patch after a system rebuild.but it will not install.
i get to the installsheild welcome screen, click next, then accept the license agreement but then it loops back to the install screen....
I'm stuck and can't move on to the next screen. any ideas?
Version 3.0 is fully installed and activated.
I've uninstalled. then installed the trial version, tried it on that. same result.
installed the full version without activating - same result.
OS is Win 7 64bit.

I have the exact same problem. Two computers, both have Windows 7 64 bit. The patch installs fine on one, but on the other, I have the exact same problem you describe here. I only installed it on the second computer to see if I could replicate the problem, but everything worked out fine instead. The first computer still has the problem.

Similar Messages

TS1398 Hi I run the 6.0.2 patch and I stiil have the same problem, no wifi connection even if i change the wireless antenna and the security any ideas??

Hi I run the 6.0.2 patch and I stiil have the same problem, no wifi connection even if i change the wireless antenna and the security any ideas??

There are two steps to the update for an iPhone 5. First you run the patch then you update the iOS. Did you do both? And does iOS 6.0.2 show up in Settings > General > About > Version
The first thing apple will tell you to do if you bring them the phone is to reset the phone. Try that before going any further.
First thing to try is to reset your device. Press and hold the Home and Sleep buttons simultaneously ignoring the red slider should one appear until the Apple logo appears. Let go of the buttons and let the device restart. See if that fixes your problem.

Deskjet 720 Series, need patch for 32 bit Windows 7, same problem as 64 bit

I have been frustrated trying to get my Deskjet 720C printer to work with Windows 7. I saw that the 64 bit problem was solved but it says not for the 32 bit. Why can't it be used on the 32 bit? And what should I do? Thanking you in advance. Mo

The 64 bit version of the drivers for the Deskjet 710/720/810/820/1000 series printers do not work properly as delivered and a patch is required, available here. This patch works for Vista and Windows 7, there is no patch available for Windows 8 at this time.
The 32 bit version of Vista, Windows 7 and Windows 8/8.1 do not require a patch, the delivered driver works. The usual issue with the 32 bit version is the port connection. The Deskjet 720c only had a parallel port and most WIndows 7 machines only have USB ports. There are USB-Parallel converter cables available, but these can be problematic. If you are using a USB-parallel converter cable you will need to make sure you have one that is compatible with Windows 7. The models mentioned in the posts here have been tested to work by folks in the forum.
If you have not resolved the issue please provide some additional details of the problem you are seeing, including how the printer is connected (parallel cable or USB-parallel cable), how the driver wwas installed and any error messsages you see.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Problems running 8.1.5.0.2 patch...

Hi there...
I4m trying to install those 81501 and 81502 patches for 8i and I4ve found this problem :
$ORACLE_HOME/precomp/demo/proc/demo_proc.mk
$ORACLE_HOME/precomp/public/bits/mathcalls.h
didn4t work because ?????
$ORACLE_HOME/precomp/demo/
$ORACLE_HOME/precomp/public/
just don4t exist !!!
How can it be possible not having the directories created ? Can anybody help ?
Thanks in advance...

Make sure that you have installed all components and options of Oracle, as the patch script assumes that.
As an example, though not related to your problem, see 2.2:
http://homepages.tig.com.au/~jmsalvo/linux/oracle8i.html

Performace problem in oracle DB after Solaris 10 recommended patching

Dear All,
We are facing some performance problems in our oracle DB qerries and reports recently. We applied Solaris 10 recommended patchset on april 24th. Our monthly report generation acitivity is now running for last 3 days i.e may 11,12,13 and application team is complaining of degraded performance. I can see that the cpu usage on the server is about 100% during the report generation , but everything else is fine. Free memory is 15gb , all mountpoints are under 80% and there is no other hardware issue as well.
Now app team is suspecting that last month patching could be the cause of the problem, because till last month they were performing this activity without having a performance degradtion.
I just need to be sure that solaris 10 recommended patches are not causing this issue. Any of you ever faced such an issue after patch installation ?
The server is V490 with 8 cpu / 32gb RAM. Any hints will be appreciated ?
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 1005720 on May 13, 2013 9:58 PM

I did not archive the o/p of prstat but have o/p of top with me
195 processes: 175 sleeping, 13 running, 1 zombie, 6 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 78.4% user, 21.6% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 32G phys mem, 16G free mem, 70G total swap, 70G free swap
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
18964 oracle 39 41 0 6389M 5488M cpu/1 2:50 15.04% oracle
19638 oracle 26 59 0 6390M 5490M run 0:27 8.58% oracle
19648 oracle 36 31 0 6418M 5516M run 0:21 5.92% oracle
19023 oracle 34 30 0 6398M 5498M run 0:37 5.88% oracle
7229 oracle 38 30 0 6427M 5514M run 234:24 5.69% oracle
6912 oracle 45 31 0 6395M 5483M cpu/16 218:04 5.31% oracle
7216 oracle 28 31 0 6430M 5517M run 232:40 5.04% oracle
19644 oracle 35 40 0 6390M 5490M cpu/17 0:24 4.74% oracle
6897 oracle 112 30 0 6392M 5479M run 236:38 4.52% oracle
3813 oracle 106 31 0 6428M 5528M run 100:11 4.43% oracle
18970 oracle 234 31 0 6398M 5499M cpu/0 1:45 4.15% oracle
19749 oracle 1 32 0 6386M 5486M run 0:00 4.05% oracle
19646 oracle 23 31 0 6405M 5505M run 0:25 3.61% oracle
18972 oracle 11 32 0 6398M 5497M run 2:18 3.61% oracle
7220 oracle 258 32 0 6468M 5555M cpu/3 113:13 3.56% oracle
During the entire issue there was no %iowait.

Problem after upgrade from patch level 36 to 43

Hi,
Recently our system is upgraded from 36 to 43 patch level. After this there are problem in doing hiring action, IT0000 is saving but the next infotype IT0001 does not gets saved and also no error message. So, really not able to figure out what could be the problem.
I was debugging the standard code i.e once the 'save' button is clicked in IT0001 in PA40, but in vain. I am not able to find out where or in which program/include the data gets saved in PA0001. If any one aware of this please let me know.
Since IT0001 is not getting saved, there are probs with IT0007 and IT0008.
Please let me know your views.
Thanks,
Arunsri

Hi Raju,
Thanks for the reply. Ya, the problem was not due to upgrade,but some other issue. Not able to find till now. I checked IGMOD features and it is in 'Active' mode only. No luck.
Edited by: Arunsri on Jan 27, 2012 4:18 PM

Ise patch 1 and 2 for 1.1.4 problem with resetting-application

Hi guys,
For your info. ISE patch 1 and 2 got the same problem on 1.1.4. If you got patches installed and tries to reset the application of ISE the monitoring applets are all gone. It's loading an empty page. Solution: rollback any installed patches. Monitoring is back up again. Install the patches again and erverything is fine. Took me one afternoon to figure this out.

Hi Ravi,
Do you know, what is going wrong? I'm wondering if everything is working correctly and if patches are applied correctly.

CPU Patch Problem in One of DB instance

Hi Gurus's,
On AIX two Oracle DB(11gr2) instances are running(D1 and D2).
I successfully applied "CPUApr2013" to D1 and same information is reflecting in "registry$history" , but on second instance "D2" after excuting "*SQL> @catbundle.sql cpu apply*" it generates following output in log file as well i can not find and update about patch in DB registry .
Apply script: /oracle/app/oracle/product/11.2.0.2/dbhome_1/rdbms/admin/catbundle_CPU_D2_APPLY.sql
Rollback script: /oracle/app/oracle/product/11.2.0.2/dbhome_1/rdbms/admin/catbundle_CPU_D2_ROLLBACK.sql
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Executing script file...
Please guide me what could be the reason and how patch D2 DB with latest patch.
Thanks .
Vaishali.

Just update ,problem is "catbundle CPU_<ORACLE_SID>ROLLBACK.sql and catbundle CPU_<ORACLE_SID>APPLY.sql were not created." when i excuted "catbundle.sql cpu apply " for second (D2) instance.
Thanks.

Permission problem when trying to patch the kernel

Hello, my name is Rodrigo and I have a VAIO laptop. The problem with it is that it has soo many privative components that are very hard to get to work under Linux. Fortunately, I found a project http://code.google.com/p/vaio-f11-linux/, which aims to provide full suport to VAIOs in Linux.
In order to do this I had to patch the Kernel http://code.google.com/p/vaio-f11-linux … nelSupport
So I started to follow the instructions.
1) I downloaded from kernel.org the lastest stable release (2.6.39)
2) I made cd /usr/src/linux and unpacked the tar contnents from the kernel file into this directory
3) I made "sudo curl http://www.absence.it/vaio-acpi/source/ … 6.39.patch | patch p1" and I got this:
patching file include/linux/sonypi.h
patch: **** Can't rename file /tmp/poSN3DW6 to include/linux/sonypi.h : Permission denied
I don't know if I'm the problem or if the patch is "bad".I already submitted the problem to the Issues page from the project, but maybe I made something wrong, any help would be apreciated
Rodrigo

I don't think sudo was meant for strange things like downloading a patch and then piping it into the patch command. If you want that to work, you should either run "su" to make sure you are root beforehand, or split up the commands like so:
sudo curl http://www.absence.it/vaio-acpi/source/patches/vaio-2.6.39.patch >vaio-2.6.39.patch
sudo patch p1 <vaio-2.6.39.patch
The generic instructions for using this patch will probably work but it will be cleaner if you look at the wiki page for Arch's take on custom kernels.
Last edited by ConnorBehan (2011-05-25 03:15:06)

Problems after patch 120230-08

I have installed that patch and i encountred a lot of problems. I'll start with the most important SSL imap, pop3 doesn't work. After upgrade i noticed that my ssl certification is out of date so i tried to recreate it
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -N -d /opt/sun/messaging/config -f /opt/sun/messaging/config/sslpassword.conf
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -S -n SampleRootCA -x -t "CTu,CTu,CTu" -s "CN=Sample Root CA, O=Sample.pl" -m 25000 -o /opt/sun/messaging/config/SampleRootCa.crt -d /opt/sun/messaging/config -f /opt/sun/messaging/config/sslpassword.conf -z /etc/passwd
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -S -n Server-Cert -c SampleRootCA -t "u,u,u" -s "CN=sun.workgroup.Sample.pl, o=Sample.pl" -m 25001 -o /opt/sun/messaging/config/SampleSSLServer.crt -d /opt/sun/messaging/config -f /opt/sun/messaging/config/sslpassword.conf -z /etc/passwd
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -V -u V -n SampleRootCA -d /opt/sun/messaging/config
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -V -u V -n Server-Cert -d /opt/sun/messaging/config
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -L -d /opt/sun/messaging/config/
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/certutil -L -n Server-Cert -d /opt/sun/messaging/config/
/opt/sun/messaging/sbin/modutil -list -dbdir /opt/sun/messaging/config/
chown mailsrv:mail /opt/sun/messaging/config/key3.db
chown mailsrv:mail /opt/sun/messaging/config/cert8.db
Did all that steps (where Sample = my company name) and every result from that command was as before. Checked configutil:
service.imap.allowanonymouslogin = no
service.imap.banner = "%h %p service (%P %V)"
service.imap.enable = 1
service.imap.enablesslport = yes
service.imap.idletimeout = 30
service.imap.maxsessions = 4000
service.imap.maxthreads = 250
service.imap.numprocesses = 1
service.imap.plaintextmincipher = 0
service.imap.port = 143
service.imap.sslcachesize = 0
service.imap.sslport = 993
service.imap.sslusessl = yes
Everything seems fine. I checked my old old configutil entries and turned out almost all 'encryption' entries aren't there. So i added those
encryption.nscertfile = config/cert8.db
encryption.nskeyfile = config/key3.db
encryption.nsssl3 = on
encryption.nsssl3ciphers = "rsa_rc4_40_md5,rsa_rc2_40_md5,rsa_des_sha,rsa_rc4_128_md5,rsa_3des_sha"
encryption.rsa.nssslpersonalityssl = Server-Cert
But everytime i added them i had:
/opt/sun/messaging/lib/configutil -o encryption.nsssl3ciphers -v rsa_rc4_40_md5,rsa_rc2_40_md5,rsa_des_sha,rsa_rc4_128_md5,rsa_3des_sha
OK SET
WARNING: unrecognized option encryption.nsssl3ciphers has been set
So i wonder what's up, what changed between versions. It was supposed to be quick fix but it wasnt :/
My version:
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-0.08 (built Jun 8 2006)
libimta.so 6.3-0.08 (built 08:28:13, Jun 8 2006)
Linux workgroup.sample.pl 2.6.12-1.1381_FC3smp #1 SMP Fri Oct 21 04:03:26 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Any help will be appreciated :/

I've solved the problem myself. Turns out there were few sslpassword files.
sslpassword file had just: mypassword
while
sslpassword.conf had Internal (Software) Token:mypassword
seems the LEGIT one is just plain password in sslpassword file. Then it all works fine. Hopefully this will save some time to some ppl.
Cheers

SO7 installation problem patch 5

Hello,
I try to apply the patch so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin on a serverinstallation, but the installation fail. (OS : suse 9.2 glibc 2.3.3)
I do:
./so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin -patch [path to network installation] --> I see a message in a window for a very short time, to short for reading. No other error message. If I start SO7 I can��t see any patch information.
Next I do:
./so-7-pp5-bin-linux.bin -patch [path to network installation] -v -debug --> A window pop up with "INSTALL_INFO flag is missing ExitCode 9".
What does it mean?
BeforeI have patch no. 4 installed with no problem. On my second computer with Debian OS I have no problem to install patch no. 5
Next I do: Remove SO7 competely and install again. The same problem, but now I can��t install an earlier patch again too.
I removed an unused earlier installation of OpenOffie also and install SO7 completly again. Nothing. I can��t install any patch
What can I do?
Regards
Udo

This will probably not be much help; SO7 was unstable when installed on a system with glibc 2.3.1 (Libranet 2.8 Debian). The applications would start but would shut down after a few keystrokes. When patch #5 arrived, I installed it and noted that the instability problem was gone.
I am now wondering if the compiler used for the patch 5, which now apparently has backward compatibility with an older glibc version may be incompatible with the version used in SuSE.
NB I have reported separately another strange incompatibility with SO8 and KDE 3.2.x. SO8 segfaults under KDE but runs perfectly under other windows managers on the same system. I have reported this to Sun/SO and am awaiting a response.

Problem installing patch 118208-51

I am trying to install patch 118208-51 but i am getting following errors.
pkgadd: ERROR: The package <SUNWmsgco> is currently installed on the system in t
he
global zone. To install the new instance of this package in the global
zone only, you must specify the -G option. To install the new instance
of this package in all zones you must first remove the existing instance
of this package from the global zone first (via pkgrm) and then install
the new instance of this package in all zones.
pkgadd: ERROR: package <SUNWmsgco> cannot be installed on this system/zone
What should I do now.

Thanks Jay after installing the messaging server and ims patches my messaging server http service failure problem gone but after doing the calendar sso configuaion my calendar server httpd still unable to start.
Whats wrong there, do I need to install any other patch specialy for calendar server ?

HT4623 Why isn't Apple talking about the security problem and the iOS software patch?

Why isn't Apple telling us about the iOS security problem and the software patch?

There's an iOS security problem already?
They just issued an iOS update...

8.1.7 Installation Problem on Pentium IV Sony VAIO PCV-RX651 with XP Operating System

Have problem installing Oracle 8i Enterprise Edition on a SONY VAIO with XP Personal Edition. The "Explore CD" and "Browse Documents" buttons of the Oracle Universal Installer/Autorun responded but the "Install/DeInstall Products" button did not. Oracle 8i DB from the same CD was installed and ran just fine on a Pentium III Toshiba laptop with Win2000 ?! Please help.
Thanks.
CNguyen
[email protected]

================================================================
Doc ID:
Note:131299.1
Subject:
Oracle Installer 8.1.X Hangs on Machines with Pentium 4
Processors
Type:
ALERT
Status:
PUBLISHED
Content
Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Creation
Date:
02-JAN-2001
Last
Revision Date:
18-APR-2001
This alert was modified 16-January-2001 by specifying specific
Oracle Universal
Installer Versions in the the Versions Affected section.
Oracle Universal Installer (OUI) for 8.1.x Hangs on Machines
with Pentium 4
Processors
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Versions Affected
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oracle 8.1.5
============
Oracle Universal Installer 1.6.0.9.0
Oracle 8.1.6
=============
Oracle Universal Installer 1.7.0.19.0
Oracle 8.1.7
==============
Oracle Universal Installer 1.7.1.9.0
Platforms Affected
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any platform that uses the Intel Pentium 4 processor, with the
Sun JRE
and Symmantec JIT will encounter this problem. Windows NT,
Windows 2000
and NetWare platforms are confirmed to be affected.
Description
~~~~~~~~~~~
When installing Oracle Products with the Oracle Universal
Installer (8.1.x)
on machines that use the Sun JRE and Symmantec JIT, the
installer hangs.
Specifically for the Windows platform, the following version
of the Symmantec
JIT or earlier will encounter the failure:
Symantec Java! JustInTime Compiler Version 3.10.107 for JDK
1.2.
Details regarding this issue can be found at:
http://developer.intel.com/design/processor/future/manuals/knowni ssue.htm
How to determine if you have Symmantec Java for JDK 1.2:
1. Select the file "symcjit.dll" and right click on it.
2. Select Properties, then the Version tab.
3. Under Microsoft Windows*, the properties of the DLL are:
"Symantec Java! JustInTime Compiler Version 3.10.107 for
JDK 1.2 Copyright (C)
1996-99 Symantec Corporation Dynamic Link Library file".
DLLs older than this will also not work. "
Likelihood of Occurrence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Any platform that uses the Intel Pentium 4 processor, with the
Sun JRE
and Symmantec JIT will encounter this problem. Windows NT,
Windows 2000 and NetWare platforms are confirmed to be
affected.
Possible Symptoms
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The failure typically is that the affected application simply
terminates.
Workaround
~~~~~~~~~~
Not only will OUI be affected by this bug, most of the
post-install
configuration tools will also be affected. Running these
tools with "-nojit"
specified will avoid the hang, but it is not simple to specify
"-nojit" for
some of the products.
The following workaround works for the Windows operating
system:
a. Copy only the install directory from the CD to the hard
disk ,say, e:\temp.
b. Open oraparam.ini and make the following modifications
(Assuming CD
drive is f:)
* Change the "SOURCE=" line to use the full path to the CD
instead of a
relative path. (i.e., SOURCE=f:\stage\products.jar)
* Change the "JRE_LOCATION" line to use the full path to the
CD instead of a
relative path. (i.e.,
JRE_LOCATION=f:\stage\Components\oracle\swd\jre\1.1.7\1\DataFiles
\Expanded)
* Change the "OUI_LOCATION" line to use the full path to the
CD instead of a
relative path. (i.e.,
OUI_LOCATION=f:\stage\Components\oracle\swd\oui\1.6.0.9.0\1\DataF
iles\Expanded
* Change the "JRE_MEMORY_OPTIONS" line to add "-nojit" as the
first argument.
(i.e., JRE_MEMORY_OPTIONS=-nojit -ms16m -mx32m)
^^^^^^
* Other entries should remain the same
c. Launch setup.exe from the temporary location on your hard
drive (i.e.
e:\temp\install\win32\setup.exe). This will use the
modified
oraparam.ini and pick up the information from the CD since
the absolute
locations are specified.
Choose a Custom install and choose not to create a database
during the
install. This way, the Database Configuration Assistant will
not be launched
during installation.
The Net8 Configuration Assistant will still be launched, and
there is no way
to suppress it. You will need to kill the Net8 Configuration
Assistant if it
hangs due to the bug. The installation still will have been
successful, and
you can run the DBCA and NetCA after installation.
To kill NetCA if it hangs during installation:
In the "Configuration Tools" window, highlight the "Net8
Configuration
Assistant" and click "Stop". If that does not work, look for
the most recent
JRE process using the Task Manager, and kill it manually.
NOTE: the OUI
itself will also have a jre process. Be sure to kill the one
with the most
recent date, which should be the jre process being used for
Net8CA, not the
one for OUI itself.
After killing the configuration tools and continuing through
the installation
to the "End of Installation" screen, you should modify the
configuration tools
to use "-nojit", then call the appropriate tools from the
Start Menu.
Once installation is complete, each of the following files in
the ORACLE_HOME
needs to be modified:
assistants\dbca\dbassist.cl
assistants\dbma\dbmig.cl
assistants\ifa\ifa.cl
bin\elogin.cl
bin\owm.cl
ldap\oidamdin\oidadmin.cl
network\tools\netasst.cl
network\tools\netca.cl
owm\install\instelogin.cl
owm\install\instowm.cl
Edit the contents of the above files to add "-nojit" as shown
below:
Command=("C:\Program Files\Oracle\jre\1.1.7\BIN\JREW" -nojit
-classpath ....
this is the only thing you need to add --> ^^^^^^
Then, launch the necessary tools, like Net8CA and DBCA from
the Start Menu.
Patches
~~~~~~~
Currently there is not a patched installer available to deal
with this
problem, the workaround listed above must be used.
References
~~~~~~~~~~
[BUG:1507768] INSTALLER FAILS WHEN RUNNING ON NEW PENTIUM 4
(IV) PROCESSORS
[BUG:1507946] INSTALLER FAILS WHEN RUNNING ON NEW INTEL
PENTIUM 4 (IV) PROCESSORS
@[BUG:1518935] SYMCJIT.DLL DOESN'T WORK WITH THE NEW P4
PROCESSORS
Oracle
Support Services.
Copyright (c) 1995,2000 Oracle Corporation. All Rights
Reserved. Legal Notices and Terms of Use.
================================================================
The solution of making a local copy of the installation CD on
the hard disk and renameing symcjit.dll to symcjit.old does
work to allow installation of Oracle Client 8.1.7 on a Pentium 4
This function is useful and you can find two file to rename
===============================================================
Windows ME
Solution to the installation of Oraclei8.1.7 PE in Windows Millennium
Oracle does not support installing version 8.1.7 PE into
Windows Millennium.
As an unsupported workaround, you may add the following line
to the [compatibility95] section of win.ini prior to
installation:
Jrew=0x00080000
After setup is complete, Oracle will recommend a reboot.
There is one additional step necessary prior to reboot;
Oracle may add a non-standard path statement to the
autoexec.bat file. Please modify this SET PATH
statement to use short-filenames if you find a quoted
LFN string represented as part of the path. You can
confirm that the path was merged successfully into the
registry after reboot by examining the PATH variable
in the registry at
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\SessionManager\Environment
Symptoms of a missing Oracle path statement in the registry are that Net8 Easy Config will not launch.
Please note that Oracle does not support the use of this
product in Windows ME, but have authorized these workarounds
for testing purposes only.
===============================================================
Windows XP Home Edition
Oracle 8i is not certified on windows XP. Even if yes, it must be Windows XP Professional.
You can install Oracle8i on windows XP Home Edition, try like this:
1 - Copy your Oracle CD into hard disk in your
machine. For example Copy from oracle8i CD into C:\Oracle\ ...
2 - Search the two files named Symcjit.dll on the D drive (where you have copied Oracle8i. You can found them in (example):
C:\Oracle\stage\Components\oracle.swd.jre\1.1.7.30\1
\DataFiles\Expanded\jre\win32\bin\symcjit.dll
3 - Rename this file (Example): symcjit_back.dll (make sure to find two files and rename them)
4 - Execute the Oracle setup.exe from C:\Oracle\setup.exe
===============================================================
When Oracle 8i dies on the install or the installer hangs, here is the fix for this, make sure that you have Service Pack 2 installed.
1. \JRE\1.3.1\ From Sun. (You can download java program at http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.1/jre/download-jre-windows.html)
2. Install the java file.
There is also a problem in the installation disk.
3. Make a copy of the Oracle 8i disk on the local hard disk.
4. Do a search for the two files called symcjit.dll and rename them for example: symcjit.old.
5. Install Oracle from the win32 directory.
================================================================
PLEASE NOTE THAT ORACLE DOESN'T SUPPORT THE USE OF THOSE PRODUCTS IN WINDOWS ME, BUT HAVE AUTHORIZED THESE WORKAROUNDS FOR TESTING PURPOSES ONLY

Problem about Installation J2SDK1.3.1 on Solaris 2.6

hi,happy new year everyone,
I have installed J2SDK1_3_1_02-solsparc.sh on Solaris 2.6, and it prompted to me installation sucessfully. but when I run javac or other commands, it prompts to me the following error:
**************************************************************Error: failed /usr/local/apps/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/lib/sparc/client/libjvm.so,because ld.so.1: /usr/local/apps/j2sdk1_3_1_02/bin/./../bin/sparc/native_threads/jav
ac: fatal: libCrun.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
I have checked the setup file size. and there is no ld.so.1 in any directory.
Who can tell me why and how to resolve it? thanks a lot.

I had exactly the same problem. You need to apply patch 105591-12. This solved the problem.

Patching 3.0 to 3.0.1 problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for