Patching : translating jsps failed

Hi Friends,
I am working on 11.5.10.2 Windows 2003 Server, Db 10.2.0.4.
When i am applying one minipack(11i.HZ.N 3618299 ) i got below error messages , please some one guide me whats that mean...can i ignore these messages.?
searching untranslated...12313
translating jsps... 32% complete: 4048/12313 ETA: 10m14s
translating jsps... 73% complete: 9009/12313 [failed: 1] ETA: 3m41s
translating jsps... 99% complete: 12204/12313 [failed: 118] ETA: 8s
translating jsps...12313/12313 [failed: 118] in 15m10s
compiling jsps... 20% complete: 2449/12195 ETA: 20m13s
compiling jsps... 39% complete: 4830/12195 [failed: 1] ETA: 15m24s
compiling jsps... 64% complete: 7908/12195 [failed: 2] ETA: 8m12s
compiling jsps... 83% complete: 10214/12195 [failed: 4] ETA: 3m55s
compiling jsps...12195/12195 [failed: 4] in 23m30s
Thanks In advance
Raghu

Hi,
When i am applying one minipack(11i.HZ.N 3618299 ) i got below error messages , please some one guide me whats that mean...can i ignore these messages.?Did the patch stop running or not? If the patch completed successfully and you can query AD_BUGS table and find the patch (search for 3618299), then you can safely ignore this error.
Regards,
Hussein

Similar Messages

Portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside dst inside

Hi!
I have a problem with allowing traffic to UC500 subnets on ASA 5505 inside interface.
My asa is a main router with addres 192.168.1.1
UC500 voip box is connected to ASA's inside interface through UC500 WAN port with UC500 with 192.168.1.2 address.
Firewall and NAT on UC500 is disable
UC500 sip traffic works fine. voipbox creates its subnets for data and voip - 192.168.10.0 and 10.1.1.0. another important address is 10.1.10.1 which is UC500 CUE.
My problem is that from within ASA local network (192.168.1.0) i cannot reach UC500 subnets, neither can I reach ASA's local network from the UC subnets.
the log says
3
Sep 07 2013
00:21:49
DC
53
PBXCUE
32901
portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside:DC/53 dst inside:PBXCUE/32901
I tried exempting uc500 subnets on ASA but that didn;t work.
Funny thing is that I CAN reach the UC500 subnets when connecting with VPN to ASA...
Please help! I am not familiar with CLI.
I configured static route to 10.1.10.0 and since then I was able to ping 10.1.10.1 thorugh ASA;s VPN.
I would be grateful for ideas.
Lukasz
global (inside) 1 interface
global (outside) 101 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
static (inside,outside) tcp interface https IIS https netmask 255.255.255.255 dns tcp 200 200 udp 200
static (inside,outside) tcp interface www IIS www netmask 255.255.255.255 dns tcp 200 200 udp 200
static (inside,outside) tcp interface smtp IIS smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
static (inside,outside) tcp interface pop3 IIS pop3 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
static (inside,outside) udp interface domain RenBetPBX domain netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
static (inside,outside) udp interface 5061 RenBetPBX 5061 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
static (inside,outside) udp interface sip RenBetPBX sip netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
static (inside,outside) tcp interface 13000 SQL 13000 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x
route inside PBXCUE-network 255.255.255.0 RenBetPBX 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy

Hello Julio!
Thank you for your advice.
I have managed to solve my main problem by reconfiguring my switches vlans - enabling trunk port configs for required ports and allowing them access to both vlans.
Now I can see everything from all of my inside networks.
I continue my ASA adventures - I have managed to configure L2TP client access for my windows users, RADIUS authentication for domain users and yesterday night I have managed to configure site to site VPN with my RV120W router.
I am only an enthusiast but my recent successes have given me apetite for more...
I keep reading forums and trying to solve most of my problems myself but I have faced another one now and thought that maybe you could give me another tip on where to look for the issue:
I still have one problem with my L2TP VPN config - I have configured split tunnel on the group policy to tunnel only 192.168.1.0 network requests.
access-list DefaultRAGroup_splitTunnelAcl standard permit 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
My network at home is 192.168.2.0 but it still tunnels everything (when I check my ip after connecting to VPN my home laptop still identifies with ASA gateway(!) address .
access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any interface outside object-group DM_INLINE_ICMP_1
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq smtp
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 8080
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 23456
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object-group DM_INLINE_SERVICE_1 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 any
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 13000
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside range 8001 8016
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 interface outside eq ssh
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any 192.168.1.240 255.255.255.240
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any PBXVOIP-network 255.255.255.0
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip any PBXCUE-network 255.255.255.0
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 igolomska-network 255.255.255.0
access-list inside_access_in extended permit udp object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2 any object-group DM_INLINE_UDP_1
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip host IIS any
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip host RBSTORE_NAS any
access-list inside_access_in extended deny udp any any object-group DM_INLINE_UDP_2
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp any any eq 5432
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp any host PBXCUE eq www
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp host PBXCUE any eq www
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp host RBCAMSTORE_NAS host EXCH-MBX eq smtp
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp host RBSTORE_NAS host EXCH-MBX eq smtp
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp host RENBETUPS host EXCH-MBX eq smtp
access-list inside_access_in extended permit tcp host RenBetPBX host EXCH-MBX eq smtp
access-list DefaultRAGroup_splitTunnelAcl standard permit 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 igolomska-network 255.255.255.0
route print shows:
and 192.168.1.240 is my VPN IP - its metric has higher priority than the local gateway.
How do I change it?
Active Routes:
Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface Metric
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      192.168.2.1    192.168.2.126   4250
          0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0         On-link     192.168.1.240     21
      80.51.24.22 255.255.255.255      192.168.2.1    192.168.2.126   4251
        127.0.0.0        255.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1   4531
        127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1   4531
127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1   4531
      169.254.0.0      255.255.0.0         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
169.254.104.126 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
169.254.255.255 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
    192.168.1.240 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.1.240    276
      192.168.2.0    255.255.255.0         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
    192.168.2.126 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
    192.168.2.255 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
        224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1   4531
        224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
        224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link     192.168.1.240     21
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1   4531
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.2.126   4506
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255         On-link     192.168.1.240    276
===========================================================================
I am starting to feel like I am using a bit too much of your friendliness ...
Best Regards and have a great day!
Lukasz

VPN problem behind ASA5505 -regular translation creation failed for protocol 50

Dear All,
I have to connect behind my ASA5505 with an VPN klient to an other site.
First time i got this failure.
"Deny protocol 50 src inside:192.168.50.X dst outside:x.x.x.x by access-group "acl_in" [0x0, 0x0]"
Than I opened our inside (src 192.168.50.0) network the UDP 500,4500 TCP 500,4500,10000 and ESP (dest x.x.x.x remote firewall ip).
access-list acl_in extended permit esp host 192.168.50.0 host x.x.x.x eq isakmp
access-list acl_in extended permit udp host 192.168.50.0 host x.x.x.x eq 500
access-list acl_in extended permit eudp host 192.168.50.0 host x.x.x.x eq 4500
etc.
After that i could connect for the remote firewall with vpn client but i couldn't reach any PC1s on there side and ping gives back no anwser.
Deny protocol 50 was solved but i got an other problem:
"regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src inside:192.168.50.X dst outside:x.x.x.x"
I found somewhere thet lines can help:
crypto isakmp nat-traversal
inspect ipsec-pass-thru
But this wasn't usefull.
I tried a many thing but i'm stuck.
Could somebody help me what can i do to solve this problem?
Thanks for all anwsers!

The solution was the following for one IP!
object network x.x.x.x                      (inside IP)
   host x.x.x.x                                  (inside IP)
   nat (inside,outside) static y.y.y.y     (remote IP)

Patch 120185-09 failed to install (SO update 5)

hi,
on a SunOS 5.9 Generic_117171-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
i have this error:
Checking installed patches...
Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
Patch 120185-09 failed to install due to a failure produced by pkgadd.
See /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log for details
Patchadd is terminating.
14:29 filesrv1:/home/mets1/wcohrs>more /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-onlineupdate
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-res
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-help
Original package not installed.
Package not patched:
PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-res
Original package not installed.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
/mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/120185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: /mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/1
20185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: cannot open
pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
please help
regards
Wolfgang
Message was edited by:
kasimong
solved
see
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5066286&tstart=0

The StarOffice patches are most likely being recommended as there are one or more SUNWstaroffice packages installed on the system, but the patch installation cannot complete due to an incomplete installation of StarOffice. Check for any installed StarOffice packages and remove them if present:
# pkginfo | grep SUNWstaroffice

Patch 9239090 Worker Fails On Applying MSDODPCODE.sql

EBS Version - 12.1.2 - Suse Enterprise - 10 - SP2
DB - 11.2.0.3 - s390 - zLinux
I am applying the 12.1.3 upgrade patch to our 12.1.2 instance and one worker fails with the following....
I've run this upgrade for testing purposes 4 time prior to this and never encountered this error.
I would appreciate any/all suggestions.
Thanks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
begin dbms_aw.execute('upd'); end;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-37605: error during OLAP AW UPDATE
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [wbackstream: size], [8128], [3964],
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AW", line 93
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AW", line 122
ORA-06512: at line 1
Time when worker failed: Fri Feb 15 2013 16:12:05
Time when worker started job: Fri Feb 15 2013 16:12:06
Start time for file is: Fri Feb 15 2013 16:12:06
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not sure if this is relevant or not - but the user account OLAPSYS was in a 'EXPIRED/LOCKED status. I unlocked the account - but not sure what password to use to set it to.
I also have an SR open for this - but not expecting any replies until Monday. :(
Edited by: 864641 on Feb 15, 2013 3:34 PM

I also have an SR open for this - but not expecting any replies until Monday. :(
Edited by: 864641 on Feb 15, 2013 3:34 PMYou can escalate it to Sev 1 -- How To Escalate a Service Request (SR) with Oracle Support Services [ID 199389.1]
Please also see:
Patch 6678700 Worker Fails On Applying MSDODPCODE.sql With ORA-33292 Insufficient Permissions To Access Analytic Workspace APPS.ODPCODE; ORA-33262: Analytic workspace ODPCODE does not exist. [ID 1054417.1]
MSDODPCODE.SQL Fails Applying U6678700.Drv [ID 1151274.1]
When running script MSDODPCODE.sql error ORA-37002 occurs [ID 467879.1]
Upgrading 11.5 to 12 MSDODPCODE.sql or FPAMAIN.sql Fail OLAP Express APPS.ODPCODE Analytical Workspace [ID 1319007.1]
ORA-33292 Insufficient permissions to access analytic workspace APPS.ODPCODE Error When Applying Patch 9058835 [ID 977196.
Thanks,
Hussein

Parsing of JSP failed in WLS 8.1; useBean

          I'm receiving a message that says,
          Parsing of JSP file '/share/html4login.jsp' failed: /share/html4login.jsp (3)
          class 'String' could not be loaded.......
          Here is the line it identifies as being in error:
          <jsp:useBean id="returnUrl" scope="request" call="String"/>
          If I change it to the following it works,
          <jsp:useBean id="returnUrl" scope="request" call="java.lang.String"/>
          I'm not all that savvy with JSPs, but is this expected behavior??
          Thanks


one option is to create a symbolic link called "applications" under your domain directory pointing to the directory under which the wars are kept.
cheers !
Dips

During R12 upgrade adworker for patch u6678700.drv fails for afopp002.sql

Hi Experts,
During R12.1.1 upgrade from 11.5.10.2 adworker for patch u6678700.drv fails for afopp002.sql
The exact error being faced is
sqlplus -s APPS/***** @/u03/oracle/CRP1PROD/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/patch/115/sql/afopp002.sql &un_fnd &pw_fnd
Connected.
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: Oracle Error Mkr1= -24018 - ORA-24018: STOP_QUEUE on
APPLSYS.FND_CP_GSM_OPP_AQ failed, outstanding transactions found
ORA-06512: at line 15
I even tried restarting the worker,bounced the database and even tried running u03/oracle/CRP1PROD/apps/apps_st/appl/fnd/12.0.0/patch/115/sql/afopp002.sql manually which hangs for indefinitely.
Any suggestion.

Hi Srini,
Let me walk you through briefly regarding the upgrade process:
Initially the existing instance was 11.5.10.2 with 9.2.0.6 database.Last year the database was upgraded to 11.2.0.1 and configured with 11.5.10.2
However the 11g database upgrade steps specifically for EBS 11i(interoperatibility notes for 11i with 11g database) was not followed properly.
And one of the major key issue identified was the 11g Example CD was not installed on top of 11g software during database upgrade.Which is the pre-req for 11g upgrade in EBS
And as per my experience it creates issues during R12 upgrade (patch u6678700) and giving errors pertaining to oracle text error.
SR was raised for the same and was suggested, since there is no other option kindly install the Oracle 11g software and on top of that 11g Example CD and map the 11g database and go ahead with the R12 upgrade.
Now coming back to the core issue being faced, Pre-req followed properly.No errors in alert logs.
Can missing the Example CD installtion be the issue?
Regards,
Aman Vats

Recommended patch 125541-02 fails to install

Patch 125541-02 fails to install. When it is running patchadd perhaps, it complains that the dependency package SUNWthunderbird is not present. I am not inclined to search and add support for it unless it is necessary. I tried it five different hosts running Solaris 10. The results are the same.

I had exactly the same results on a Sun Blade running Sol 10 11/06. The patch will not install using update manager, or with smpatch add -i, or from the manually downloaded patch using patchadd.
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWthunderbird from directory SUNWthunderbird in patch 125541-02 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWthunderbird will not be applied to the system.

Patch 17036545: workers fails IBY (ibytmppp, ibyupgpp)

Hello friends
While applying patch 17036545 workers failed. I checked logs and found errors:
US_ibytmppp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_EDI_ANSI_X12_820, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
US_ibytmppp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_EDI_PAYMUL, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
US_ibytmppp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_EDI_SWIFT_MT100, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
US_ibyupgpp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_BANK_TRANSFER_REQ, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
US_ibyupgpp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_CHK_1_CO, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
US_ibyupgpp_ldt.log: Error loading seed data for IBY_UPG_PPP: SYSTEM_PROFILE_CODE = IBY_PAY_CHK_2_CO, ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
I skipped failed jobs and checked documents 1216933.1 & 763557.1 which are suggested on this forum. I tried to follow steps given in both documents but neither there is any file like ibyfdut.odf nor there is any table like iby_upg_ppp_b in database.
Please help.
Oracle Apps 12.1.1 with VISION instance on OEL 5.5.
Regards
Aneel Ahmed

qazianeel wrote:
I'm sorry I was replying from communications page and by mistake replied on other discussion and later was finding it here
Bro. the patch has been applied with no other errors. Do I apply it again?
Regards
Aneel Ahmed
If the patch was applied and you can find it in AD_BUGS table, then no further action is required after implementing the solution in the docs referenced by AsifMuhammad
If the patch doesn't exist in AD_BUGS table then you need to apply it again.
Thanks,
Hussein

Patch 124171-01 fails to install

Patch 124171-01 fails to install on an Ultra-80 and a V210 models. I installed it manually to get the message that the "SUNWscnbase-r" package is not installed so the patch is aborted.
The Ultra-80 runs Solaris 10 release 03/2005. The V210 runs Solaris 10 01/2006. I typically load everything in the installs so this patch should not have been recommended to them.

root hypert /var/sadm/spool # smpatch analyze
124187-01 SunOS 5.10_x86: flash issue with SUNWscn-base due to broken package
Maybe the patchinfo wasn't specific enough?
root hypert /var/sadm/spool/124187-01.jar.dir/124187-01 # more patchinfo
PATCHINFOVERSION="1.0"
PATCHID=124187-01
PATCH_CORRECTS='BaseOS.SolarisCore-5.10'
PATCH_ARCH='i386'
PATCH_OS='SunOS'
PATCH_OSRELEASE='5.10'
PATCH_PROPERTIES='clientroot'
This seems to indicate all Solaris 10 systems would need this patch - but I don't know if UM uses this info when deciding which patches to recommend.

9.2.0.3 patch set installation fails on Solaris 8

i've installed Oracle9iR2 (64-bit) client on a Solaris 8 system and i'm now having problems installing the 9.2.0.3 patch set. during the installation process i get the following error message from OUI:
Error in invoking target install of makefile
$ORACLE_HOME/network/lib/ins_net_client.mk
i checked the installation log and then $ORACLE_HOME/install/make.log. make.log reports that the failing command is:
/usr/ccs/bin/make -f ins_net_client.mk install ORACLE_HOME=/opt/oracle9i/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0
this command fails when trying to link trcroute. the link command seems to have incorrect paths as it seems to expect to find crt?.o files from $ORACLE_HOME/lib/WS6U1 while they are located in $ORACLE_HOME/lib/WS6U2/lib/v9. i modified $ORACLE_HOME/network/lib/env_network.mk (CCVER, COMPOBJ) so that crt?.o can be found.
after this change the same link command fails with this message:
ld: fatal: file $ORACLE_HOME/network/lib/s0nur.o:
wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to trcroute
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `trcroute'
i checked the object files in network/lib and they all seem to be ELF 32-bit.
does someone know what's causing these problems with the installation and how to fix it?
best regards,
aspa

that's what i started to suspect as well. it's quite likely that the patch is for 32-bit installations. i'll try it with the 64-bit patch. thanks.

Installing OBIA 11.1.1.7.1 on Windows 7 (64-bit). While applying platform patches it's failing.

The final_patching_report.log is showing as follows:
----------START OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
* BIAPPSSHIPHOME Patching Report ..........
Patch Succeded: fsclite_rel7mlr2_16424872.zip
Patch Succeded: BISHIPHOME_11_1_1_7_0_GENERIC_130409_1210_16492220.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5A_database_16239380.zip
Patch Succeded: atglite_rel7mlr5_16480022.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlitedb_rel7mlr2_16424869.zip
Patch Succeded: fsmlite_rel7mlr2_16424870.zip
Patch Failed: BISERVER_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130326_2045_4_16583998.zip
Patch Failed: BIFNDN_11_1_1_7_0_WINDOWS_X64_130322_1000_5_16462147.zip
* Oracle Common Patching Report ..........
Patch Failed: p16433147_111170_Generic.zip
Patch Failed: p16080773_111170_Generic.zip
Patch Failed: Webservices_Patch-3-PS6RC3_bug-16487786.zip
Patch Failed: p16433036_111170_Generic.zip
Patch Failed: JDEVADF_REL7MLR10-RT_16525527.zip
Patch Failed: WebCenter_BP1REL7RC3_16311963.zip
Patch Failed: fmw_diagnostics_14757820_2.zip
Patch Failed: SOACOMMON_REL7B8_16438735.zip
* SOA Patching Report ..........
Patch Failed: SOA_REL7B8_16438735.zip
* ODI Patching Report ..........
Patch Succeded: p16629917_111170_Generic.zip
* Weblogic Patching Report ..........
----------END OF PATCHING REPORT------------------
The biappshiphome_win64_patches.log output:
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.1.0.9.9
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files\Oracle\Inventory
   from           : n/a
OPatch version    : 11.1.0.9.9
OUI version       : 11.1.0.9.0
Log file location : C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-07-09_15-31-18PM_1.log
OPatch detects the Middleware Home as "C:\MiddlewareHome"
Verifying environment and performing prerequisite checks...
Prerequisite check "CheckActiveFilesAndExecutables" failed.
The details are:
Following files are active :
C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1\\bifoundation\jlib\securityservice-api.jar
C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1\\bifoundation\jlib\common.jar
C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1\\bifoundation\jlib\securityservice.jar
Log file location: C:\MiddlewareHome\Oracle_BI1\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2013-07-09_15-31-18PM_1.log
OPatch failed with error code = 73
Similar output in oracle_common_generic_patches.log.
There is no output for Weblogic Patching Report.
Thanks,
Neeraj

Hi Niraj,
               in which method your going to install the OBIEE i.e in the Enterprise installation mode or software installation mode. have u edit the apply platform patch file. will you let me know content in the files.
Thanks,
Yogi.

SRM-MDM 3.0 SP10 Patch 1 - logon failed

Hello there,
we have a urgend problem after upgrading the SRM-MDM Components and the MDM Server.
Problem is, that we are not able to logon to the app ui or the search ui. It's not a Problem with the user. When logon to the app ui we receive the message "logon failed".
Connection to the Repository via MDM Clients works very well. Only the Web UI is not accessable.
To be sure we are having the right SPs for the Components we downloaded the latest Support Stack that includes all components versions that fits to each other (thats what i think).
At least we have now
MDM Server SP06
MDM Catalog SP10 Patch 1
Java API SP10 Patch 0
MDM Connector SP10 Patch 7 (?)
Here's the information from the connection test via mdm utilities
!======================================!
Host-Adresse = 10.199.29.243
Host Name = mpgmdms
Repository-Port = 2000
!======================================!
MDM-Server-Ports werden geprüft...
Verbindung ok (Port 59950, Zeit = 0 ms)
Repository-Ports werden geprüft...
Verbindung ok (Port 2000, Zeit = 0 ms)
Verbindung ok (Port 2001, Zeit = 0 ms)
Verbindung ok (Port 2002, Zeit = 0 ms)
JAVA-API-Version von MDM ermitteln
Admin Version = 7.1.07.101
Build Version = 7.1.07.166
Content Version = 7.1.07.101
Meta Version = 7.1.07.101
!======================================!
Verbindung zu MDM-Server 10.199.29.243 wird hergestellt
MDM-Server-Version wird ermittelt...
Version = Version 7.1 (7.1.06.234 Win64)
!======================================!
Installierte Repositories werden ermittelt...
-> MPG_DEV_MASTER (S36/ORCL)
-> MPG_DEV_SLAVE2 (S36/ORCL)
-> MPG_DEV_SLAVE (S36/ORCL)
-> MPG_TEST_REPOSITORY (S36/ORCL)
From the visua administrator we get the following releaseinformation:
MDM_Connector 1000.710.700.7.1.201105150802
MDM_JAVA_API 1000.710.0.7.166.20110410110411
SRM_MDM_CAT 1000.3.0.10.1.20110429065011
Within the MDM Console we get a some log entries when trying to log in.
Hope you can help me.
Thank your
Rico
Edited by: Rico Stoll on May 25, 2011 6:31 PM

ur API / connector and MDS are on diff SP levels :
JAVA-API-Version von MDM ermitteln
Admin Version = 7.1.07.101 Interface CRC=0x7d50b0cf
Build Version = 7.1.07.166
Content Version = 7.1.07.101 Interface CRC=???
Meta Version \t= 7.1.07.101 Interface CRC=0x3a0a3732
!======================================!
Verbindung zu MDM-Server 10.199.29.243 wird hergestellt
MDM-Server-Version wird ermittelt...
Version = Version 7.1 (7.1.06.234 Win64)
upgrade the MDS to SP 07 and things should start working !
thanks
-Adrivit

JSP fails silently: Logs reveal "exception occurred in JNI_OnLoad"

I'm running Apache Tomcat/4.1.10 with JVM 1.4.0_02. This is all running on Solaris 2.6 under a chrooted environment and seems to work quite well when I run test apps and such.
Here's my problem:
I installed Jive 2.6.1 Enterprise and attempted to run the initial setup tool by pointing my browser to /admin/setup/index.jsp. The JSP output starts loading into my browser, but then stops abruptly. The setup tool never finishes.
Logs record a stack trace after this first failed attempt. Subsequent attempts to run the JSP record a different stack trace. They're listed below in order.
I'm banging my head against a wall trying to debug this. Installing a previous version of Tomcat didn't change anything. Google searches have not been forthcoming, except that most JNI_OnLoad errors seem to happen on Solaris. I've copied countless megs worth of *.so files into my chrooted environment. Any insight into this would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Greg
2002-09-20 10:19:26 StandardWrapperValve[jsp]: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: exception occurred in JNI_OnLoad
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:246)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:289)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:247)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:260)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2397)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:170)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:171)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:405)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.ja va:380)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:508)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:533)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
----- Root Cause -----
javax.servlet.ServletException: exception occurred in JNI_OnLoad
at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:497)
at org.apache.jsp.index_jsp._jspService(index_jsp.java:1064)
at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:136)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:202)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:289)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:247)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:260)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2397)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:170)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:171)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:405)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.ja va:380)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:508)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:533)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
2002-09-20 10:19:51 StandardWrapperValve[jsp]: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:246)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:289)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:247)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:260)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2397)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:170)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:171)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:405)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.ja va:380)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:508)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:533)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
----- Root Cause -----
javax.servlet.ServletException
at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:497)
at org.apache.jsp.index_jsp._jspService(index_jsp.java:1064)
at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:136)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:202)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:289)
at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:247)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:193)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:260)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2397)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:180)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:170)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:171)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:641)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline. java:643)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:480)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:995)
at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:223)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:405)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.ja va:380)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:508)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:533)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)

Update:
Running Tomcat from a non-chrooted environment gives correct behavior. Evidentally my Jive installation is fine, my Tomcat is fine, and my JVM is fine.
The problem must be related to the chroot, where the JVM is trying to load some native library that doesn't exist in chroot world.
My question is simply, how do I figure out which one? Can anybody point me in the right direction?
Thanks a bunch,
Greg

While installing oracle apps 11.5.10 the post installion check JSP fails

Hi Guys,
While installing oracle apps 11.5.10 on oracle linux OEL4.7 i am facing one post installation check failure i.e JSP CHECK. even i tried aoljtest its getting fail.
I am output of error log file and access log files.
Environment:
Oracle apps version:11.5.10
Os :oracle linux 4.7
bit :32 bit
database : vision type
Error_log file contains
[Thu Aug 23 03:38:27 2012] [error] OPM:Can not find one alive process
[Thu Aug 23 03:38:27 2012] [error] [client 49.248.45.6] File does not exist: /oa_servlets/AppsLogin
[Thu Aug 23 03:38:37 2012] [error] OPM:Can not find one alive process
[Thu Aug 23 03:38:37 2012] [error] [client 49.248.45.6] File does not exist: /servlets/weboam/oam/oamLogin/oam/oamLogin
Access_log file contains
173.49.29.80 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:08:08 -0400] "GET /OA_HTML/jsp/fnd/fndhelp.jsp?dbc=/11i/applmgr/visappl/fnd/11.5.0/secure/VIS_ora11i/vis.dbc HTTP/1.1" 404 239
173.49.29.80 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:08:08 -0400] "GET /OA_HTML/US/ICXINDEX.htm HTTP/1.1" 200 3483
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:12:38 -0400] "GET /aplogon.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:12:40 -0400] "GET /oa_servlets/AppsLogin HTTP/1.1" 404 227
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:12:49 -0400] "GET /servlets/weboam/oam/oamLogin HTTP/1.1" 404 234
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:01:16:36 -0400] "GET /FND_WEB.PING HTTP/1.1" 404 218
smtp.ttml.co.in - - [23/Aug/2012:01:19:06 -0400] "GET /servlets/IsItWorking HTTP/1.1" 403 230
smtp.ttml.co.in - - [23/Aug/2012:01:19:11 -0400] "GET /servlets/IsItWorking HTTP/1.1" 403 230
smtp.ttml.co.in - - [23/Aug/2012:01:20:43 -0400] "GET /servlets/IsItWorking HTTP/1.1" 403 230
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:23 -0400] "GET /oa_servlets/AppsLogin HTTP/1.1" 404 227
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:27 -0400] "GET /oa_servlets/AppsLogin HTTP/1.1" 404 227
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:32 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:32 -0400] "GET /apptitle.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:32 -0400] "GET /applist.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:32 -0400] "GET /aplogon.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:32 -0400] "GET /appsmed3.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:37 -0400] "GET /servlets/weboam/oam/oamLogin HTTP/1.1" 404 234
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:44 -0400] "GET /appdet.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
49.248.45.6 - - [23/Aug/2012:03:38:47 -0400] "GET /appdet.html HTTP/1.1" 304 -
Please provide some solution.

Please see these docs.
Servlet and JSP Pages return a "Page Not Found" Error After Install of Applications [ID 372096.1]
"Unrecognized Option: -Client,Could Not Create The Java Virtual Machine." With Applications 11i [ID 358061.1]
Receiving ''Internal Server Error'' When Checking Out From Supplier Punchout After Upgrade to Java Development Kit (JDK) 6 [ID 781750.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Patching : translating jsps failed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for