Payment block key not editable in FB02

Hi,
I have problems relating to payment block key. In particular, documents with posting key = 09 seems to have this field (BSEG-ZLSPR) hidden in FB02. How can I have that field editable?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Gabriele

Hi,
It's already defined in OB32.
D           BSEG-ZLSCH          Payment Method
D           BSEG-ZLSPR          Payment Block
D           BSEG-ZTERM          Terms of Payment
Field name      BSEG-ZLSPR            Payment Block                                                                               
Account Type    D      Customer line items          
Transact.type          Payments, invoices, credit mem
Company Code           In all company codes                                                                               
Field Can Be Changed                                                                               
Posting period not closed                           
Line item not cleared                               
Customer Debit or Vendor Credit                     
No invoice-related credit memo                      
No credit memo from down payment         
Edited by: Raistlin82 on Feb 3, 2010 3:45 PM

Similar Messages

  • Payment block key TEXT  loading error

    Hi,
    When trying to load master data to the info object 0PMNT_BLOCK, I'm getting the error:
    <b>Value '# ' for characteristic 0PMNT_BLOCK contains invalid character RRSV     7     
    0PMNT_BLOCK : Data record 12 ('#E '): Version '# ' is not valid     RSDMD     194</b>     
    The Payment block key '#' is valid in R/3 for this characteristic
    Please help.
    Thanks

    try to replace "#" in your transformations for master data with space (ABAP code). or edit the PSA for that record.
    Message was edited by:
            Manga Paidikondala

  • Payment block R , not stopping while payment to Vendor

    While making MIRO, invoice has been blocked with 'R', but without releasing block system is accepting payment.
    What might be the reason.

    Hi,
    Check Payment Block Indicator settings T.Code: OB27
    In your case "Change in Payment Praposal", "Manual Payment Block" and "Not changable" not select check boxes.
    Regards,
    viswa

  • F-04: give error message when clearing AP items with payment block key(R)

    Hi all,
    Customer wants to prevent payment for AP items with payment block key(BSEG-ZLSPR) .
    I want system giving error message when doing payment clearning with t-code:F-04.
    How can I realize it ?
    Thanks Grus!
    Lynn

    Please configure the following nodes properly:
    Financial Accounting>>Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable>>Business Transactions>>Outgoing Payments Global Settings>>Payment Block Reasons>>Define Payment Block Reasons & Define Default Values for Payment Block
    For the error message: You may define a validation in OB28 with the help of ABAP consultant

  • Opportunity payment status is not editable

    Hi,
    In WEBUI opportunity payment status filed is not editable, Is that security issue or configuation issue?
    Please suggest which authorization object can allow for allow change or edit the filed.
    Please guide me to improve the security skills for CRM.
    (I am new to CRM security and doesn't have the crm guide or documents - Need you suggestion)
    Thanks,
    SK

    Hi,
          Please check with the functional person if it is supposed to be editable in standard.
      From technical point of view, there could be multiple things:
    1. press F2 on the field -> open component -> view -> check view config -> field properties (if field is disabled)
    2. go to context node -> field -> GET_I method of the field and check why is it disabled
    3. it may be coming as read only though genil
      It would require some technical expertise to check above things.
    I hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Rohit

  • Payment Block key update

    I need to block certian AP invoices from being processed for payment with B, this needs to be done through creating idoc with IBM transformation extender (third part tool which supports SAP interface), what idoc type I need to use?

    Hi,
    Payment idoc message types are PAYEXT.  You may have to put a control in segment E1IDKU3 and field PAIRZAWE.
    Check with the team from middleware (IBM transformation extender) team to have control on the field e.g. E1IDKU3-PAIRZAWE.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Payment block non editable on the basis of company code level

    Dear Gurus,
    we had made payment block "A" non editable in payment praposal through transaction code ob27.as per reqeust from
    our partent company in India but our subsidiary in France wants the payment block "a"  to be editable (to be insert
    payment block "a" in document to make document deselect). Is it possible to make payment block editable on the basis of
    company code level.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    In this scenario, you need to have a NEW Payment block key like Z. Create Z with reference to A in OB27.
    For Z, you need to select check box Change in Payment Proposal and SAVE.
    Now maintain this Z in vendor masters of company code, where you want the payment block can be edited.
    Note: Payment Block codes are not company code dependent.
    Regards,
    SRinu

  • Payment block is require for posting key 29

    Dear Guru,
    Payment block field is not apearing for posting ky 29 and 39.
    Can any one tell me how it will come for posting key 29 and 39.
    I have checked in OB41.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    Normally payment block is not set by posting key.
    You can set this field to be showed in account group of vendor or customer.  If you only want payment block to be required fiield for payment key 29, you have to use the suggest above to use a substitution in FI.
    Edited by: Tracy@DE on May 25, 2011 12:15 PM

  • FB02 - Payment Block

    Hello,
    We have a security requirement to control the payment block field in transaction FB02. Does anyone know if any authorization objects exist for this field?

    If I remember correctly, you control this via field status variants in customizing and "block reasons".
    What applies there, applies to the transaction processing as well generally (the inability to remove a payment block, for example). But FB02 is a G/L journal transaction... so such "logistically dependent" events are sometimes missing such checks because they are not intended if the user gets that far...
    The fastest way to check is to debug it and jump to the source code location to see your options.
    Whether there is a customizable exception or an object which can be used I don't know off-hand. Perhaps your choice of transaction for this requirement is not correct....
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Payment block "R" in accouting document of AP.

    Dear all,
    I found the vendor item in an accouting document has been set as block for payment "R" - Invoice verification. This accouting document was generated via MIRO.
    But now this block has been removed in accouting document, and now I can't find the block reason for the related invoice via MRBR.
    I want to know if there is a method, that I can find the block reason, because I am not sure if this block is set due to tolerance limit.
    Or is there any other reason to set payment block "R" to a vendor, except tolerance limit.
    Thank you  for your help.
    BR,
    Christina

    Hi,
    If you have maintained the QM Control key in the material master which has invoice block tick in the setting. the standard behavior of the SAP system is as the following:
    If to the material the QM in procurement is active and in the QM control key invoice block is active the invoice will be blocked for quality reasons if there is still no usage decision for the inspection lot or if
    the inspection lot is rejected.
    The invoice itself will be blocked automatically, the Payment Block Key will be set to R. The Blocking reason I is not visible in the invoice and has nothing to do with the settings in OMR9.
    As per the online documentation:
    Quality Inspection (I)
    If a material is defined as being relevant for quality management, goods receipts for this material are posted to stock in quality inspection. Invoices for the material are blocked until the inspection has been
    successfully completed.
    If more than one goods receipt is posted for an order item, an inspection is carried out for every goods receipt. In Invoice Verification, the system reacts differently depending on whether goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is active:
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if the inspection has not been completed for the goods receipt.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is not defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if any goods receipts are still in quality inspection. If an invoice is posted before the goods are received, it cannot be blocked for quality inspection.
    Hope the informations are useful to you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing
    Edited by: Gladys Xing on Sep 15, 2009 4:30 PM

  • Payment Block A in ERS document

    Experts,
    When we put an A blcok in the vendor master and post invoices using LIV, the invoice is posted. When you display the invoice document, you will not see the A block on document level. We know that when the invoice is due, the payment proposal will report that the invoices can not be paid due to the A block in the vendor master. The A block need to be removed from the VM to be able to pay the invoices.
    However, if we post ERS invoices for the same vendor, the ERS document posted contain the A blcok on document level and we need to remove the A block on document level.
    Why is there a difference between ERS and "normal" invoices with these A blocks ?
    Appreciate your feed back
    Thanks
    Fred

    Hi,
    If you have maintained the QM Control key in the material master which has invoice block tick in the setting. the standard behavior of the SAP system is as the following:
    If to the material the QM in procurement is active and in the QM control key invoice block is active the invoice will be blocked for quality reasons if there is still no usage decision for the inspection lot or if
    the inspection lot is rejected.
    The invoice itself will be blocked automatically, the Payment Block Key will be set to R. The Blocking reason I is not visible in the invoice and has nothing to do with the settings in OMR9.
    As per the online documentation:
    Quality Inspection (I)
    If a material is defined as being relevant for quality management, goods receipts for this material are posted to stock in quality inspection. Invoices for the material are blocked until the inspection has been
    successfully completed.
    If more than one goods receipt is posted for an order item, an inspection is carried out for every goods receipt. In Invoice Verification, the system reacts differently depending on whether goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is active:
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if the inspection has not been completed for the goods receipt.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification is not defined in the purchase order.
    The invoice is blocked if any goods receipts are still in quality inspection. If an invoice is posted before the goods are received, it cannot be blocked for quality inspection.
    Hope the informations are useful to you!
    Best Regards,
    Gladys xing
    Edited by: Gladys Xing on Sep 15, 2009 4:30 PM

  • F-28 online payment block

    Hi,
    I am getting an Error while processing Customer Payments on T Code : F-28, The Error is as follows :
    1 item(s) was/were not activated due to online payment block : Message no. F5528
    Please help me resolve the issue
    Regards,
    Sagar

    Hi,
    Review your settings on V_T008 for the payment block key associated to this vendor's open line item. Take special care about column "Manual Payments Block" as this flag it is the one that causes this behaviour in the system.
    Aso check whether any substitution is active in your company code in OB28 which put the automatic payment block.
    Also check whether the payment term assigned to the customer has the payment block key assigned in OBB8 transaction.
    Also check whether this customer is captured in a incomplete/ forward dated Payment run, alternatively run an open item list FBL5N for the customer, using a display variant showing "payment block" to confirm what type of payment block exists. You may need to run this showing "all items", as the payment run may have a forward dated "Posting Date" hence why it is currently open as at "todays" "clearing date" but marked as being blocked.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • How to populate the payment block through the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE

    Hi,
    I am trying to create the incoming invoice through the BAPI (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE) .
    In MIRO transaction when i create the Invoice without any tax , the <b>payment block shows free for payement</b> . How to give create the invoice with the following condition through the BAPI (BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE) .  when there is Tax : The payment block = 'R' (Invoice verification) .
    No Tax                : The payment block = ' ' (Free for Payment).

    But everytime the invoice is created the Payment block is set to 'R' even if the Tax is not given.
    Following i am populating
    <b>Header Structure:</b>
    <b>Test                   Value Description                      PI Header Data Fields</b>
    ‘X’                Invoice Indicator     HEADERDATA-INVOICE_IND
    SPACE                Document Type     HEADERDATA-DOC_TYPE
    05-11-2006           Document Date     HEADERDATA-DOC_DATE
    17-11-2006           Posting Date                     HEADERDATA-PSTNG_DATE
    123456-B1                Ref Document Number     HEADERDATA-REF_DOC_NO
    9001               Company Code     HEADERDATA-COMP_CODE
    7006924               Vendor Number     HEADERDATA-DIFF_INV
    BRL               Currency                     HEADERDATA-CURRENCY
    BRL               Currency                     HEADERDATA-CURRENCY_ISO
    10000               Gross Amount      HEADERDATA-GROSS_AMOUNT
    05-11-2006          Baseline ate                     HEADERDATA-BLINE_DATE
    DD               Header Text                     HEADERDATA-HEADER_TXT
    0001               Payment Terms     HEADERDATA-PMNTTRS
    123456-B1               Ref Document Number     HEADERDATA-REF_DOC_NO
    Z1               NF Type                       HEADERDATA-J_1BNFTYPE
    space               Payment Block Key      HEADERDATA-PMNT_BLOCK
    <b>For Item Structure:</b>
    <b>Test Data     Description            BAPI Item Data Fields</b>
    000001                     Invoice Item           ITEMDATA-INVOICE_DOC_ITEM
    4500021387     Purchase Order Number   ITEMDATA-PO_NUMBER
    0010                     Purchase Order Item           ITEMDATA-PO_ITEM
    Z1                     Tax Code                           ITEMDATA-TAX_CODE
    SP 50308                     Tax Jurisdiction Code           ITEMDATA-TAXJURCODE
    10000                      Item Amount           ITEMDATA-ITEM_AMOUNT
    200                      Item Quantity           ITEMDATA-QUANTITY
    EA                      Purchase Order Unit           ITEMDATA-PO_UNIT
    Can u please tell me what is the mistake or any other ways of populating the Payment block.
    Always the payment block is 'R' in MIR4 transaction even if i give space in the BAPI

  • F-44 clear open item of payment block

    Hi dear.as we know we can do F-44 to clear open AP.my client has requirement is as:
    if open AP item has payment block,,can not clear it before removing payment block.
    can anybody tell me how to achieve it

    Did you (or anyone else) manage to apply the payment block in f-44?
    I did it, by activating BTE 00000950 and testing field ZLSPR as it reads and validates itens of the document screen.
    Edited by: Alec Souza on Apr 29, 2011 8:21 PM

  • Payment Block at the time of FB60

    Hi
    I want to have payment block flowing directly in FB60. I shud not enter manually
    So what i did:
    I went to OBA3. There i defined tolerance group and i gave payment terms as 0002
    In that payment terms, i have given payment block key A
    But when i did FB60, i saw no payment term and payment block is populated at vendor line item. Let me know the reason why it didn't flow to vendor

    Please check, that you are giving that tolerange group in the vendor master in FK02 > Company Code Data > Accounting Information. Also the payment term assigned in OBA3 is used only for residual item creation in F-44.
    To fetch the payment block in FB60, you should assign the payment term (having payment block in OBB8) in the vendor master in FK02 > Company Code Data > Payment Transactions.
    Regards,
    SDNer

Maybe you are looking for

  • Submitting values from a form to a workflow

    Hey, I am using IDM 5 SP5. Is a link (using the arguments property) the only way to pass information from a form to a workflow? (using op_variable name) I was hoping to do it with a button. Has anyone achieved this?

  • Unable to get Fault in reply from Synchronous BPEL Process

    Hi All, I am using a synchronous BPEL process which always throws a fault. The structure of this fault message is added to <bpel_process_name>.xsd. For WSDL faults I have added the following in .wsdl file: </wsdl:message> <wsdl:message name="Business

  • Grant number in customer line item report

    Is it possible to bring in the grant number in the customer line item report, fbl5n? I tried expanding the fields in the report, but grant does not seem to be one of them. Please help!!! Thanks, MJ

  • Font Size limited user

    How can a limited user change eg.g. font size (System Initialisation / General Settings) ? Only Professional Users are allowed to use this menu item..... Thanks in advance Andreas

  • Cannot find Site Inventory table in Logging database in SharePoint 2013

    I'm trying to build an Analysis Services cube based on the wss_logging SharePoint 2013 database, like I did some times ago in SharePoint 2010. I'm extracting Site Sizes for example from the sitesize table. My problem is that all sites are referenced