Payment clearing on amount with mismatching business areas

Hi, gurus:
We recently activated AR module under 4.6c.
We use automatic clearing which calls FB1D, based on amount match between the cash receipt and the invoice.
The invoice comes with an business area, but the cash receipt record (RM doc type) has a blank business area.
The payment will clear, but SAP actually creates a new WO record to clear the invoice. The WO record contains the business area from the invoice.
The RM cash receipt record has no business area after the payment clearance. This creates a problem for us during reporting for the business area, and the new WO record also screws up the real WO amount in our Write-Off reports.
Is there a user exit in FB1D(SAPMF05A) that would allow us to add the business area to the RM record during payment clearance, and avoid the creation of the WO record ?
Thanks.

May be you can use Substitutions:
http://webmailmty.softtek.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/5b/d231a843c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards.

Similar Messages

Document Splitting with Different Business Area

HI
I have a situation, where i need to create a new document type and it needs to be configured in such a way that vendor invoices and credit notes can be booked with the correct doc splitting and using different Business Areas.
I like to know if this is possible, and if yes how.
Earlier the client used to post the transactions, with different business areas, as we get only a warning message to reset the business area of the vendor.
Now that we have activated New G/L accounting, with document splitting we get the warning message,
but then the profit center will not balance, so we have an error.
The client requires that they need to post to a different business area, and the document splitting should happen.
Any suggestions on this will be great.

Hi Srikanth,
In my config setting under Document Splitting i have the Zero Balance ticked for it.
My Scenario is as an Ex. I am debiting a G/L account for 1000, and giving Business Area X, with a cost Center which is assigned to Business Area X.
And Crediting a Vendor for 1000 with Business Area Y.
Will this scenario work with Document Splitting enabled, i am doubtful on this, but my client needs this.
Can you tell me if this is a possible scnerio.
If yes then how?

Automatic payments with no Business Area aggregation

Hello,
I am trying to run an automatic payment program for one vendor and the system splits the open items by Business area. But I donu2019t want that. I would like to aggregate line items in one, if my payment is just one.
I've check my customization and in transaction FBZP, on selection "All Company codes" I donu2019t have the field "Separate Payments for each Business Area" selected.
Do I need any other customization?
Does anyone know some?
Thank you very much for your attention.
Regards.
Rita

Dear Rita,
In order to check Business Area Payment go to FI12 and verify if you have some Business Place assigned for your Home Bank definitions. You can also check in F110 parameters tab if there is some B.P. assigned for.
regards

AR postings with multiple business areas is not allowed

Hi
A user is trying to post a customer invoice with two line items/two profit centres and two business areas (BA) and is receiving the above error message.
I feel that is is logical due to the question as to what BA the cusomer belongs to. However, I noted some threads on Document split. I am not aware of document split functionality.
Your comments on whether this is possible or how to check whether this funcionality is already configured is appreciated.
Thanks
NW

Hi,
Please check the following in IMG
FA-GL Accounting new-Business Transactions-Document Splitting-Define Document Splitting characters for general ledger accounting.
Here check whether the BA is checked for both the Zero Balance and Mandatory field.
Regards
Balaji

Not posted Treasury transactions- problem with new Business area (NewGL)

Hi all,
I have to change the Treasury account assignment objects due to a restructure. Currently, all TR transactions are assigned to one business area only.
In future, there will be 3 (different) business areas.
I have added new products, transaction tpyes etc and I have made further customising
settings. It looks ok and I can enter new transactions, settle and post them.
Problems I do have with already existing deals (fixed term and Forex transactions).
In here I get posting errors with message:
Balancing field "Business Area" in line item 001 not filled
Message no. GLT2201
I have added additional account assignment references for the new Business Areas
and assigned to product types and account assignment
What happens when I create a deal?
Is that information (product type/ transaction/ account assignment) alreaedy stored in a table and used, when processing the deal further?
Can I somehow change that original assignment per deal now?
I think my problem lies in that the system wants to use the old assignment but also the new and it comes to conflict in field business area.
Any hints much appreciated and will be reqarded as usual.
Thanks
Hein

Assign Business area in the following step (ECC 6.0)
SPRO - Financial Supply Chain Management - Treasury and Risk Management - Transaction Manager - General Settings - Accounting - Link to Other Accounting Components - Allocate Additional Account Assignments to Account Assignment References
Kalyan

Update GL accounts (historical data) with new Business Area values

Hi experts,
Situation:
One company code with multiple plants already productive w/o Business Area.
Business Area would be implemented soon to internally differenciate the company code.
What is needed:
To update with various values the GL account balances with a proper Business Area, as required, for instance starting on a new year. Something like executing a balance carry forward and be able to add the business area.
Purpose:
For internal analysis and reporting to be able to compare data without having to deal with historical data having the field Buisness Area 'blank' .
Question:
Does any body knows if a tool or program is available to do so?
Your responses are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
GG

Hi,
this message cannot be changed (OBA5) nor a new analysis period for the costcenter is helpful if any plan / actual data is posted already in this fiscal year.
If its not only test data (which can be deleted and than the change can be done) the only way is to add the business area in cost center master by maintaining CSKS-table directly if you are allowed to do so...
If there are balance sheet items (eg assets assigned to such a cost center, the balance sheet postings from asset accounting are posted with the busines area from cost center master) you have to repost them in GL accounting otherwise business area wise balance sheet is wrong.
Best regards, Christian
Edited by: Christian Ortner on Mar 23, 2010 12:15 PM

GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

Hello All,
we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
in F.13 automatic clearing:
for GR/IR account
Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

Thanks for your reply,
I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
but in F.13 :
- the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
the document can be clear
i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
Many Thanks

Business area in Cenvat clearing Accounts.

Dear Friends,
PO is already created. When Miro is done , Business area is entered which is a required field.
When Miro is simulated,all the GL Accounts have picked up the business area, but cenvat clearing accounts have not picked up the business area.
Because of this, We are unable to post Miro.
Please advise how the cenvat clearing accounts can pickup the business area?
Regards
Sridhar

done through validation.

Two business areas

Hi all
I have one G/R. In one G/R i have multiple line items. How to enter multiple business area. In Accouting document it is updating only one business area againist one Gr/Ir accounting. Remaining line items business area is empty
Please help. It is very urgent
Thanks
Krishna

Hi Prasad
Thanks for responding my query.
The query is . In one GR multiple line items are there with diffrent business areas.
while creating Accouting document in vendor line item it is not updating business area.. How we have to eliminate this problem.
i will give exp:
One item: The entry is like following
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   INR
001 31 2LSV 10143      ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PVT LTD     M3           108,099.00-
002 86 2LSV 30998      GR/IR CLEARING - MMN           M3             88,425.00
003 83 2LSV 64718      PRICE DIFF- RM (PRD)           M3                983.00
004 40 2LSV 60978      PUR A/c-Dom-Direct             M3                983.00
005 50 2LSV 60979      PUR A/C OFF SET- Dom           M3                983.00-
006 40          27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3             14,147.26
007 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                282.95
008 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                141.47
009 40       31019      VAT ITC - REVENUE             M3              4,119.69
010 50       31019      VAT ITC - REVENUE             M3                  0.01-
011 50 2LSV 64255      CASH DISC / PMT DIFF           M3                  0.36-
in above entry buseness area updated in vender
Multiple line items:
001 31       10143      ARUNA ALLOY STEELS PVT LTD     M3             57,060.00-
002 86 2SVG 30981      GR/IR IND ITEMS- MMN           M3              4,800.00
003 81 2SVG 60008      SUBCONT CHGS OTH-MMN           M3                 49.33
004 86 2LSV 30998      GR/IR CLEARING - MMN           M3             41,906.90
005 89 2LSV 22001      RAW MATL STK LO-MMN            M3                430.67
006 40 2LSV 60978      PUR A/c-Dom-Direct             M3                430.67
007 50 2LSV 60979      PUR A/C OFF SET- Dom           M3                430.67-
008 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                768.00
009 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                 15.36
010 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                  7.68
011 40       31019      VAT ITC - REVENUE             M3                223.65
012 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3              6,705.10
013 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                134.10
014 40       27009      MODVAT CLEARING                M3                 67.05
015 40       31019      VAT ITC - REVENUE             M3              1,952.52
016 50       31019      VAT ITC - REVENUE             M3                  0.01-
017 50       64255      CASH DISC / PMT DIFF           M3                  0.35-
In above entry no business area updated in vender line item
But i want business area updation in vender line item if there are multiple line items.
How can we do this?
Please guide me
Thanks
Krishna

Z1-015 Error "Enter Business Area" in BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE

Hi All, 
Here is a scenario that has totally confused me and I don't know what to do. Any guidance in this area will be highly appreciated. 
I am using BAPI BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE for MIRO. Our client gets invoices that contains both PO lines and some Non PO lines. For the PO lines I am populating the BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEMDATA table and for the non po lines I am populating the BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNTDATA table. In the structure BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNT I am also populating the Bus_Area field with the Business Area value along with other values. The header Bus_Area is also populated with business area code. 
However, when I try to post the invoice the bapi return me a message: Z1 015 "Enter Business Area" and the invoice does not get booked in SAP, 
I have tried searching this forum and also googled about it, but I got no help in this regard. Please help me out in understanding this problem. I am attaching the code below for ease of understanding my problem. I am using SAP .Net Connector for the purpose. However, any guide related to this error (may not be .Net specific) will be appreciated. 
//objects used for creating the invoice **** 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ADDRESSDATA Addressdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ADDRESSDATA(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER Headerdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_HEADER(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ACCOUNTTable Accountingdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ACCOUNTTable(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ACCOUNT Account = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ACCOUNT(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEMTable Itemdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEMTable(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNTTable Glaccountdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNTTable(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNT Glaccount = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNT(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_MATERIALTable Materialdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_MATERIALTable(); 
BAPIRET2Table InvReturn = new BAPIRET2Table(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_TAXTable Taxdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_TAXTable(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_VENDORSPLITTable Vendoritemsplitdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_VENDORSPLITTable(); 
BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_WITHTAXTable Withtaxdata = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_WITHTAXTable(); 
// **** 
// populating the header 
Headerdata.Bus_Area = invoice.BusinessArea; 
Headerdata.Comp_Code = invoice.CompanyCode; 
Headerdata.Doc_Date = invoice.InvoiceDate; 
Headerdata.Doc_Type = "RE"; 
Headerdata.Diff_Inv = invoice.VendorID; 
Headerdata.Currency = invoice.Currency; 
Headerdata.Exch_Rate = 1.00M; // to be replaced 
Headerdata.Gross_Amount = invoice.InvoiceAmount; 
Headerdata.Header_Txt = ""; 
Headerdata.Invoice_Ind = "X"; // X = Invoice , '' = Credit Memo 
Headerdata.Inv_Rec_Date = invoice.DateReceived; 
Headerdata.Pmnttrms = invoice.PaymentTerm; 
if (invoice.IsMatched == "0") 
 Headerdata.Pmnt_Block = "A"; // in case the IsMatch Status = 0 
Headerdata.Pstng_Date = invoice.PostingDate; 
Headerdata.Calc_Tax_Ind = "X"; 
Headerdata.Del_Costs = 0.00M; 
Headerdata.Ref_Doc_No = invoice.InvoiceNumber; 
Headerdata.Inv_Year = "0000"; 
// populating the line 
List<Invoice.LineItem> lines = invoice.LineItems.Where(item => item.PONumber.Trim() != String.Empty).ToList(); 
int itemCount = 0, accSlNo = 0; 
foreach (Invoice.LineItem line in lines) 
{ 
 itemCount++; 
 string strItemNo = FillCharacter(itemCount.ToString(), "0", 6); 
 BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEM Item = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_ITEM(); 
 Item.Invoice_Doc_Item = strItemNo; 
 Item.Po_Number = line.PONumber; 
 Item.Item_Amount = line.Amount; 
 Item.Quantity = line.Quantity; 
 Item.Po_Item = FillCharacter(line.PO_LineNo, "0", 5); 
 Item.Po_Unit = line.PO_Unit; 
 Item.Po_Unit_Iso = line.PO_Unit_Iso; 
 Item.Tax_Code = line.TaxCode; 
 Item.Cond_St_No = "000"; 
 Item.Cond_Count = "00"; 
 Item.Ref_Doc_It = "0000"; 
 Item.Ref_Doc_Year = "0000"; 
 Item.Po_Pr_Qnt = Convert.ToDecimal(Po_item["Quantity"]); 
 Item.Po_Pr_Uom = Po_item["Orderpr_Un"].ToString(); 
 Item.Po_Pr_Uom_Iso = Po_item["Orderpr_Un_Iso"].ToString(); 
 Itemdata.Add(Item); 
} 
// populating the GL Accounts for the non PO and PM lines where the PO number will be blank 
List<Invoice.LineItem> nonPOlines = invoice.LineItems.Where(item => item.PONumber.Trim() == String.Empty && item.LineItemType == "L").ToList(); 
itemCount = 0; 
foreach (Invoice.LineItem line in nonPOlines) 
{ 
 int multiplier = 1; 
 itemCount++; 
 Glaccount = new BAPI_INCINV_CREATE_GL_ACCOUNT(); 
 Glaccount.Invoice_Doc_Item = FillCharacter(itemCount.ToString(), "0", 6); 
 Glaccount.Db_Cr_Ind = "S"; // debit 
 Glaccount.Neg_Postng = ""; 
 if (line.Amount < 0.00M) 
 { 
 Glaccount.Neg_Postng = "X"; 
 Glaccount.Db_Cr_Ind = "H"; // credit 
 multiplier = multiplier * -1; 
 } 
 Glaccount.Comp_Code = invoice.CompanyCode; 
 Glaccount.Item_Text = line.Description; 
 Glaccount.Item_Amount = line.Amount * multiplier; 
 Glaccount.Gl_Account = line.GLCode; 
 Glaccount.Costcenter = line.CC; 
 Glaccount.Profit_Ctr = line.PC; 
 Glaccount.Orderid = line.OrderNo; 
 Glaccount.Tax_Code = line.TaxCode; 
 Glaccount.Bus_Area = line.BA; 
 Glaccount.Person_No = "00000000"; 
 Glaccount.Sdoc_Item = "000000"; 
 Glaccount.Ref_Date = "00000000"; 
 Glaccount.Wbs_Elem = "00000000"; 
 Glaccount.Profit_Segm_No = "0000000000"; 
 Glaccount.Alloc_Nmbr = line.Assignment; 
 Glaccount.Tr_Part_Ba = line.BA; 
 Glaccount.Activity = ""; 
 Glaccount.Acttype = ""; 
 Glaccount.Cmmt_Item = ""; 
 Glaccount.Cmmt_Item_Long = ""; 
 Glaccount.Co_Busproc = ""; 
 Glaccount.Costobject = ""; 
 Glaccount.Func_Area = ""; 
 Glaccount.Func_Area_Long = ""; 
 Glaccount.Fund = ""; 
 Glaccount.Funds_Ctr = ""; 
 Glaccount.Network = ""; 
 Glaccount.Rl_Est_Key = ""; 
 Glaccount.Sd_Doc = ""; 
 Glaccount.Grant_Nbr = ""; 
 Glaccountdata.Add(Glaccount); 
} 
proxyPOInvoice.Bapi_Incominginvoice_Create(Addressdata, Headerdata, out FiscalYear, out InvoiceNumber, 
 ref Accountingdata, ref Glaccountdata, ref Itemdata, ref Materialdata, ref InvReturn, ref Taxdata, ref Vendoritemsplitdata, ref Withtaxdata); 

Hi,
This error was mis leading. If CalculateTax flag is set to 'X' and there is balance in the transaction currency then, instead of giving "Balance in transaction currency" error "Enter Business Area" error comes.
There must be some logic for SAP to give this error, but it was somewhat misleading. When i removed the flag for CalculateTax="", this error vanished and "Balance in transaction currency" error came. When I retrified that my invoice got booked properly.
Thanks to all anyway for the responses provided.
Best Regards
Sutirtha

Business Area postings in Tax line items

Hi Experts,
As we know that Business Area is not updated in the tax line items, In one our company code we have done BA adjustment through F.5D and F.5E in 2007, after that there are thousands of line items in the system without business areas, now my client wants a tallied business area trial balance from 2007 onwards or aleast to ensure that the tax line items should get business area assignments from hereafter, and also recently we have created one more company code, Please help how do I ensure that all the tax line items and items with blank business areas get the business area postings. Is there any user exit or any work around available for this... At present we have only one GL for Inter business area clearing for all types of accounts (reconciliation, tax accounts) in OBXM.
Please help...
Regards,
Khan

Hello,
Are NewGL and document splitting active in your system? If yes, you should solve this problem with using splitting function.
Otherwise, you can use business transaction event 00001120.
I explained step by step how can you activate BTE 00001120. I give you message below.
Re: FBCJ - Cash Journal Transaction
In this exit, you must update t_bsegsub-gsber field which t_bseg-buzid = 'T' for tax item.
But you can not split tax line items in this exit. For example in invoice you have 2 or more business area, but tax line item doesn't create for each buiness area (If you don't use document splitting functon). So in this exit you can only assign a business area to tax line item which is automatically generate while posting FI document.
Regards,
Burak

Business Area not coming in FS10N layout.

Dear SAP Friends,
I am working in a client where "Document Splitting" was activated on the basis of "Business Area" from the 1st August,2008. In this client their is four business areas. When I am getting the balance sheet as per Business Area in F.01 every GL shown the amount as per business area & also a some of amount is shown under the not assigned head. Amount under the not assigned is total of document of having no business area.
Now my client wants that all not assigned amount should be distributed as per the business area & not assigned amount will come to zero.The field of business area is "GSBER".
Now for that I am testing it on development. I have selected on document having no business area and updated the table "BSEG" for filed "GSBER" for that business area manually through ABAP. When I am seeing the same document under FB03 the system shows the Business Area correctly which I have given in the table. But when I see the General Ledger balance in FS10N (In layout selected business area column) the same document does not give business area in that business area column. But when I select it for details it shown the business area in that document.
Now my issue is why this is happening ? or is their any another way to do this ?
Because i have to update all of documents of before 1st, August 2008 with no business area .
Please give any solution ASAP & for helpful answer points will be surely awarded.
Thanks & Regards in advance
Sandeep
Edited by: Sandeep on Dec 6, 2008 11:34 AM

Hi,
Touching a cluster table like BSEG thru ABAP is a tricky thing. You would need to work out all linkages to other tables for the data you are touching, would suggest a where used for field business area and update all other tables relevant to the data, like BSI* and BSA*.
For FS10N, the data is not read from BSEG but rather from the totals tables like GLT0.
Cheers

Business area correction in FSV

Hi experts,
we have some problem in Business area updation in Financial statement version. the problem arise because of the following reasons
1. After the Go Live we have created the 3KEH table & updated it in Productions server because of this cost center will update based on the business area settings.
2. After the Go Live for few weeks Business area is not mandatory while posting the documents. at the time of 3KEH table updation we made Business area also mandatory,
3. we have document spiting option also. in that we have business area as mandatory field.
so because of all this reason in the Financial statement the document which is posted earlier then this day (after go live & updation of 3KEH table) business area wise Balance sheet is not tally. & many of the document which is posted before to this day doesnt have business area in any one of the line items. say e.g. a document is have 4 line items, out this 4 line 1 or 2 line items doesnt have business area.
Document which doesn't have business area or part of business area (1 or 2 line items missing the busines area) for which vendors / customer we are not able to clear the document.
For the Financial statement we want to correct the business area details.
what could be the solutions except the reversing the entry & posting new document - which is very risky in this situation.
Thanks
Ravi

Dear,
You can not update the business area in Posted document...
The only solution is the reverse those entries and post with the business area...
Br,Vivek

IU Elimination Difference Subassignments (Business Area and Profit Center)

Hi experts, it's my second tread in the forum and is in one day, I'm expired.
 
 
Let's clarify the situation.
 
 
At the past I'm using the parameters settings of IU Eliminination Difference Subassigments with fixed values, now, with our necessity, we question SAP how to do a interunit elimination receiving the business area and Cons. Profit. Center from the trigger at the differences, and it apparently was simple solve, we just need to mark the "default value" flag and voila, system will do what we need, but is not so simple how we think.
 
 
In productive environment, we have data since June/2009, and we want to change this from Jan/2010, but elimination is cumulated, and I suspect SEM-BCS is trying to correct the past.
 
 
Does anybody pass this situation ?
 
 
What we need is on every elimination on selection items and the difference items receive the business area and cons. profit center from the trigger (this have to remain with the origins), and the total value of elimination on period don't have to change, do you understand ?
 
 
When change the configuration of the task and execute that, the eliminaton value change too ? We suspect it is
because we have data before this period.
 
 
If you need more explanation, please advice me, I will give more details.
 
 
Here we are in SEM-BCS 600 EHP 2
 
 
Best Regards
 
Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo

The breakdown category and the corresponding data is the same in the source system. I think I did`t express very well.
I will put my understand about the default flag of the difference screen: This is used to try to get the subassignments from the items which we select on the preview screen not the fixed parameters. i.e.: Business Area.
On January, we decided to get the subassignments on difference from the items on selection screen, for this we flag the default value, and re-execute the elimination on the monitor, but, when we execute this, the value is entirely wrong/different from the other, we suppose when we flag that and re-execute the elimination we get more line of elimination on total records with the business area, but that's not what happened, we have strange value with a total of elimination very different.
Is it clear the operation ?
I contact SAP and they are analyzing the case, but if anyone had a similar problem please advice me.
Best Regards
Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo

ME2DP & Down Payment Clearing LIV

Dear All,
I am facing three issues while creating and clearing down payment through ME2DP and MIRO.
1- While clearing down payment in MIRO, system is not clearing FI down payment document automatically. At the time of posting,, system generate two documents, one is Invoice and other is Down Payment.
2- After posting Invoice in MIRO with Down Payment clearing button, Status Red is activated in ME2DP which was green after creating down payment.
3- After executing all the entries from Procure to Payment, there is still Down Payment request outstanding in Purchase Order History.
Waiting for reply!
Regards
AJ

Hi Abdul,
The purpose of using ME2DP is you can enter down payment data in purchase orders at header and item level.
You can use the down payment clearing function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to a purchase order directly in logistics invoice verification (without going to the relevant financial accounting transactions).
If you perform down payment clearing in logistics invoice verification, when you enter an incoming invoice for a purchase order, the system proposes all down payments that have been posted with reference to the purchase order and that are not yet completely cleared, for down payment clearing. The system posts the down payment clearing document together with the invoice document.
By using ME2DP you can avoid making the down payment clearing in financial accounting as it will get cleared while posting MIRO.
Also, refer this note 1637282
Hope you will get some idea.
Regards
Shashi

Payment clearing on amount with mismatching business areas

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for