Payment in CJIA and document in FB03, Value not matching

********Reposting from FI group***********
Dear Gurus,
In a scenario where user has made a payment to vendor, a clearing document has been posted. The values are not martching in payment transaction, CJIA and the document disaplay FB03. Please find the screen shot as below:
The amount paid in FB03 TC is 11,550,730.20- and  7,945,096.92.
Whereas in CJIA report it displays 61,363,254.58- and 55,591,175.59
Kindly Note, I have already deleted and regenerated Project cash management document via programs RFFMDL16 and RFFMRP15P, but the values displays same.
I am not able to understand the values which are shown in TC CJIA.
Kindly provide your input.
Thanks and regards,
Narender.

HI Gokul,
Thanks for your reply. There are no entries in table RPSCO.
But the entries are in table COFP with BTran as KAFM and value type 57.
Regarding your questions: Another thing that i wanted to know is whether you ran CJFN for the accounting document after doing the actual payment?
Initially these values were displaying once the payment was done (VType 57). I tried to execute the correction programs considering there will be inconsistencies in table. But the values did not changed. After this values were displaying in VType 54 and hence I execute CJFN to display Vtype as 57 such as to bring the system display as initial condition.
Let me know if this helps. Further inputs awaited.
Thanks and regards,
Narender.

Similar Messages

  • Posting date in AFRU and 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source is not matching

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing an issue with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL data source, posting date in AFRU table and in data source is not matching.
    For example: we booked an activity confirmation of value 100 on 01.01.2015 posting date, Counter 1, Operation 10
    For the same operation another counter is confirmed on 01.02.2015 posting date.
    So, in AFRU table:
    Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
    1001               10               8001                             1              01.01.2015       100
    1001               10               8001                             2              01.02.2015       0
    In 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source, counter field is missing due to which only 1 record is coming which is:
    Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
    1001               10               8001                             1              01.02.2015       100
    In data source, activity of value 100 is coming on 01.02.2015 date instead in AFRU table it is booked on 01.01.2015 posting date by which we are unable to match the value in query which is based on posting date.
    Please help on this.
    Thanks,
    Sameer

    Hi Sameer,
    Please check on which date the production order has status as "completed".
    It could be on 01.02.2015.
    Thanks,
    Vimal

  • Lightroom v. 3.6 and Sony A99 RAW does not match

    I recently bought the newest Sony A99 camera, but it seems L.v. 3.6 does not manage this (aparently new) type of RAW-pictures.
    Do I have to buy the L.v.4 or can I use v. 3.6 with changing some settings?
    Thank you

    Hello mJim,
    It works. Thank you for your help.
    Eugene
    2013/3/30 jim01403 <[email protected]>
       Re: Lightroom v. 3.6 and Sony A99 RAW does not match  created by
    jim01403 <http://forums.adobe.com/people/jim01403> in *Photoshop Lightroom
    - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5192043#5192043

  • The java and sql object type  was not matched

    My table(Oracle10.2) has a varying arrays column. For mapping to java classes, I use JDeveloper(10.1.3.1.0) to generate java classes. Then I try to insert a record into this varrying arrays column with java. While it always complaints java.sql.SQLException.the java and sql object type was not matched. I can not find the reason.
    My java code:
                   StructDescriptor structdesc = StructDescriptor.createDescriptor(
                             "VARRAY_SEQ", con);
                   int nid=20;
                   int pid=546;
                   BigDecimal mynid=new BigDecimal(nid);
                   mynid=mynid.setScale(0, BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_UP);
                   BigDecimal mypid=new BigDecimal(pid);
                   mypid=mypid.setScale(0, BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_UP);
                   Object[] attributes = { "ASDF", mynid, "Developer", mypid,
                             "rwretw" };
                   STRUCT Rel = new STRUCT(structdesc, con, attributes);
                   stmt.setObject(8, Rel);
                   stmt.execute();
                   stmt.close();
    And the STRUCT is
    public RelSeq(String nucl, java.math.BigDecimal neId, String nuor, java.math.BigDecimal pId, String phor) throws SQLException
    { _init_struct(true);
    setNucl(nucl);
    setNeId(neId);
    setNuor(nuor);
    setPId(pId);
    setPhor(phor);
    }

    My table(Oracle10.2) has a varying arrays column. For mapping to java classes, I use JDeveloper(10.1.3.1.0) to generate java classes. Then I try to insert a record into this varrying arrays column with java. While it always complaints java.sql.SQLException.the java and sql object type was not matched. I can not find the reason.
    My java code:
                   StructDescriptor structdesc = StructDescriptor.createDescriptor(
                             "VARRAY_SEQ", con);
                   int nid=20;
                   int pid=546;
                   BigDecimal mynid=new BigDecimal(nid);
                   mynid=mynid.setScale(0, BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_UP);
                   BigDecimal mypid=new BigDecimal(pid);
                   mypid=mypid.setScale(0, BigDecimal.ROUND_HALF_UP);
                   Object[] attributes = { "ASDF", mynid, "Developer", mypid,
                             "rwretw" };
                   STRUCT Rel = new STRUCT(structdesc, con, attributes);
                   stmt.setObject(8, Rel);
                   stmt.execute();
                   stmt.close();
    And the STRUCT is
    public RelSeq(String nucl, java.math.BigDecimal neId, String nuor, java.math.BigDecimal pId, String phor) throws SQLException
    { _init_struct(true);
    setNucl(nucl);
    setNeId(neId);
    setNuor(nuor);
    setPId(pId);
    setPhor(phor);
    }

  • Entourage: "Event and computer time zones do not match."

    Since installing the latest update to the Mac OS (10.4.6) I have a glitch with Entourage (Office 2004 for Mac v. 11.2.3) and I believe it has something to do with the Mac OS. See below for explanation:
    When adding a new calendar event to the calendar, I get an error which reads:
    "Event and computer time zones do not match. In Calendar views, the event time is adjusted to display correctly." This is not true. I've checked the time zones in both my OS and Entourage and that is not the problem.
    It must have to do with how it interacts with the latest update of the Mac OS. I had not updated software on my laptop for a while, and it did not exhibit this error, so as a test, I downloaded and installed the latest version of Office and tested Entourage: no error message. To be sure, I restarted the computer and tried again: no error. Then I downloaded and installed all of the latest updates to the Mac OS using Software Update: I got the error. So, I think the problem is the interaction between the latest update of Office 2004 for Mac and the latest Mac OS or maybe even just something in the Mac OS.
    There are plenty of people complaining about this on the newsgroups at Mactopia. I'm not sure who needs to repair this problem - Apple or Microsoft, but does anyone know if there will be a patch issued by Microsoft to fix the problem? Or maybe my assessment is wrong and you have another solution?
    Thanks very much for your help with this problem.
    Dual G5 2.0 and Powerbook titanium   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    I am in Ohio (eastern time) and I am also having this problem. It is not annoying but my problem is I am not able to schedule any meeting on Entourage. (It will not show if the person I am inviting is busy or not). They use the Exchange server in my company, and I read on the microsoft site that public folders and hence the calendar items are not synced. But seems like this page is for Office X and not 2004. Any clues? Is the time error related to me not able to schedule meetings? I am using latest 10.4 and Entourage 2004.
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac/resources/resources.aspx?pid=resourcekits&rk=office x&article=/mac/officex/ork/KnownIssuesEntourage.xml
    MacBook Pro, iMac G4   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   2 GHz, 2G RAM

  • Ie 11 fails with 'IE Security detected that the URL and the configuration link to not match

    HI,
    I Have a user that is using IE 11 and is getting the following error:
    IE Security detected that the URL and the configuration link to not match. Please use the URL as configured.  Is and IP based URL. On IE 10 we get a similar message, but as soon as we add it to our trusted site and switch to compatibility
    mode the issue goes away.
    For example http://10.10.10.180/xxx/iafwebsite_810/
    What would be causing this issue?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Trish
    Trish Leppa

    Hi,
    It seems that this URL doesn't meet security level. Thus, as long as you add this URL to Trusted sites zone, this issue is fixed.
    Thanks!
    Andy Altmann
    TechNet Community Support

  • Entourage- Event And Computer time zones do not match. Please Help

    Event and computer time zones do not match. In calendar views,the event time is adjusted to display correctly.
    Whenever I set up a appointment I put it in at one time and it show up as another.
    PleaseHelp

    I am in Ohio (eastern time) and I am also having this problem. It is not annoying but my problem is I am not able to schedule any meeting on Entourage. (It will not show if the person I am inviting is busy or not). They use the Exchange server in my company, and I read on the microsoft site that public folders and hence the calendar items are not synced. But seems like this page is for Office X and not 2004. Any clues? Is the time error related to me not able to schedule meetings? I am using latest 10.4 and Entourage 2004.
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac/resources/resources.aspx?pid=resourcekits&rk=office x&article=/mac/officex/ork/KnownIssuesEntourage.xml
    MacBook Pro, iMac G4   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   2 GHz, 2G RAM

  • IDOC error 639 IDoc & and determined transport type & do not match

    Hello,
    can you help me with this issue?
    An idoc is stuck beacuase of this error:
    IDoc & and determined transport type & do not match
    Message no. IHC_IDOC639
    What does it mean? how can I fix thiss issue in order to re-process the idoc?
    Thank You

    Hi,
    is SAPNET note 784881 implemented? If no, implement it and try again.
    BR Christian

  • Aging report and Control account value not matching

    Hi All
    The value what i am getting from   Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching  for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
    Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
    If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
    How can i solve this issue

    Hi,
    Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
    Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
    Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
    If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
    PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • All Inventories Value Report&Inventory Ageing Report& Current And as on Date Stock not matching

    Hello All,
    I am new to inventory. I need some help.
    After opening the periods of purchasing and inventory for the month of April'15. The below reports should match in costing.
    But they are not matching. Kindly help on this as its PROD.
    Inventory Ageing Report
    Current And as on Date Stock Statement With Value Report
    All Inventories Value Report - Average Costing
    Thanks
    RR

    MBEWH is the valuation history, this is only updated with the first movement after a period closure. And the period is a month.
    There is no table in SAP that holds the stock information on daily basis.
    You have to develope this yourself. Easiest method by copying a table like MBEW and MARD  daily to a Z-Table.
    A stock situation  at a certain date can be calculated with MB5B.
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 5, 2008 4:06 PM

  • FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
    How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

    Hello,
    I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
    First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
    Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
    How can you catch this document?
    Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
    Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
    Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
    Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
    I hope it helps to you,
    Regards,
    Burak

  • Value not match in KEAT report  with FI

    Hi All,
    I am going through KEAT report, here is saw that the value of one GL Account in FI  value Column does not match with the value  of the same GL in FBL3N.
    Is there is any particular reason as other GL account value matches with the value in FBL3N.
    Regards,
    Shayam

    KEAT shows values posted from the SD module only. If the value is not the same as the account total, then possibly someone has posted to that account directly from FI (TC FB50 or similar). You should be able to find such manually posted documents in FBL3N by looking at fields like "reference" "document type" and such.

  • Billing doc number and the accounting FI doc not matching

    Dear All,
    We have created the same Number range for the Billing Document and for the Accounting Document.
    But when my Billling document get stuck for any Account determination error. ( Billing Document number is cretaed)
    But the Accounting Document is not created due to accounting determination error.
    Here the problem is accounting number is not getting reserved for the billing document. Therefore number sequence is not comming properly.(Same billing documnet number and the Same Accounting document number is not matched.)
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance
    Uwanthi

    >
    Uwanthi Perera wrote:
    > Dear All,
    >
    > We have created the same Number range for the Billing Document and for the Accounting Document.
    >
    > But when my Billling document get stuck for any Account determination error. ( Billing Document number is cretaed)
    >
    > But the Accounting Document is not created due to accounting determination error.
    >
    > Here the problem is accounting number is not getting reserved for the billing document. Therefore number sequence is not comming properly.(Same billing documnet number and the Same Accounting document number is not matched.)
    >
    > Please help me.
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    >
    > Uwanthi
    Hello
    Best practice is to have different number ranges for invoices and a/c documents. pl create and assign accordingly you wont have this issues..
    Thanks

  • Drill down value not matching with Displayed Report Painter Issue-GR55

    Hi,
    Need your help for an issue in drill down value of report painter from actual cost coloumn.
    I have created a new report group based on OSS Note-157720 in GR55 Traction. This new report group will provide data of Planed / Actual cost, Planned / Actual Quantity of the project in range of fiscal year/periods. The issue in this report is displayed data of actual cost is not matching with drill down data. The actual cost coloumn is formula coloumn which framed by subtracting All periods cost coloumn, Before Periods Cost Coloumn and After periods cost coloumn.
    Could you suggest on this issue.
    Thank you for your cooperation.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    The report you are running first might have been created with some hidden columns that contain more than one variables relating to period and fiscal year. These may not be matching those that are required to run the drilldown. Look into the definition of the drilldown report. If you would want to match the first report, It may be better to identify which report runs on drilldown and the run that report with the required parameters.

  • Service Level Report values not matching to Service Level Dashboard v 2.0 values

    Hi Experts,
    We have installed SLD v2 on a development SQL server along with WSS 3.0. The SLD is pointed to the SCOM datawarehouseDB to collect the information to have it up in the dials.
    We have SCOM 2007 R2 who's OpsMgrDB and OpsMgrDWDB are hosted on a SQL 2008 R2 instance.
    I have created the Distributed application and added 3 Service level Tracking to it. 
    Availibility
    Processor Utilization
    Memory Utilization
    The problem here i am facing is that the values in the dials on the SLD Home sites do not match with the values i get when i run the report for  Service Level Tracking Summary under reporting tab in Ops
    Console.
    What could be probable reason for this ?
    Regards,
    Prajul

    Hello,
    Here are some articles related to this issue. Hope they are helpful.
    Running a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212726.aspx
    Generating a Service Level Tracking Report
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441422.aspx
    The Service Level Tracking Summary Report in System Center Operations Manager 2007 may be empty if TODAY is not selected for the TO date
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2567404/en-us
    Best regards,
    Sophia Sun
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Maybe you are looking for